Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 7 cited by

When a light particle scatters off a Schwarzschild black hole, the black hole absorbs a calculable amount of angular momentum — a new leading-order post-Minkowskian result that fixes the final spin of the black hole.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 04:06 UTC pith:RYOVBSCO

load-bearing objection Solid Teukolsky calculation that reproduces known absorbed energy and adds a new leading-PM absorbed angular momentum, but the new result leans on an unproved all-order velocity resummation that deserves a close look in review. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.05766 v2 pith:RYOVBSCO submitted 2026-02-05 gr-qc hep-th

"Waveforms" at the Horizon

Andrea Cipriani , Francesco Fucito , Carlo Heissenberg , Jose Francisco Morales , Rodolfo Russo This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords post-Minkowskianblack hole perturbation theorySchwarzschild black holehorizon absorptionTeukolsky equationconfluent Heun equationabsorbed angular momentumgravitational waveform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish a new leading-order post-Minkowskian (weak-field, arbitrary-velocity) result: how much angular momentum a Schwarzschild black hole absorbs when a light particle scatters past it. Using black-hole perturbation theory, the authors compute the field the probe induces on the horizon, then integrate the Noether fluxes of energy and angular momentum. For gravity, electromagnetism and a scalar field, the absorbed energy reproduces previous results, while the absorbed angular momentum is new: for gravity, J_abs = π G^7 μ^2 M_BH^6 σ(7σ^2−3)/(2b^6). A sympathetic reader should care because, if correct, the formula fixes the spin a non-rotating black hole acquires from a single scattering event, turning it into a Kerr black hole in the final state, and gives a target that independent methods can be checked against.

Core claim

The central claim: the leading post-Minkowskian (large-impact-parameter) flux of energy and angular momentum into a Schwarzschild horizon is governed by the lowest multipoles, since each horizon waveform harmonic is suppressed by G^{ℓ+1}. The authors build the horizon waveforms from Teukolsky solutions resummed in the small-frequency parameter, then integrate the Noether fluxes. They reproduce the known absorbed energy for gravity, electromagnetism and scalars, and give new absorbed angular momentum: for gravity, J_abs = π G^7 μ^2 M_BH^6 σ(7σ^2−3)/(2b^6); for electromagnetism, 4G^4 M_BH^4 π^2 q_e^2 σ/b^4; for a scalar, 2G^4 M_BH^4 π^2 q^2 σ/b^4. In the nonrelativistic limit the gravitational

What carries the argument

The Teukolsky master equation for spin s = ±2, ±1, 0 perturbations, solved through the confluent Heun equation. Its solutions are expressed as hypergeometric functions in an expansion in the small parameter x = 4iMω, with the upgoing radial solution R_up scaling as G^{ℓ+1+s} for s≤0. Because of that scaling, only the lowest spherical-harmonic multipole (ℓ=2 for gravity, ℓ=1 for electromagnetism, ℓ=0/1 for scalars) contributes at leading PM order. From these radial functions the horizon waveform coefficients W^H_{ℓm,s} are assembled, and the absorbed energy and angular momentum follow from Noether-flux integrals that reduce to summing |W^H|^2 with Bessel-function master integrals.

Load-bearing premise

The closed-form velocity-resummed waveforms are obtained by extrapolating a small-velocity expansion that the authors checked only up to relative O(p_infty^20); if the pattern stops there, the new angular-momentum formulas would not be the true leading-order PM results.

What would settle it

Compute the next term in the p_infty expansion of the horizon coefficient Z^H_{22,-2} (relative order p_infty^22) and check it against the resummed expression; alternatively, solve the Teukolsky equation numerically at small but nonzero Mω for a relativistic probe and compare the integrated absorbed angular momentum with (3.24b).

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, the gravitational formula fixes the final spin of a Schwarzschild black hole after a single scattering: the absorbed angular momentum J_abs converts it into a Kerr black hole.
  • The absorbed energy formulas reproduce previous results, confirming that the gravitational energy entering the horizon equals the change in black-hole mass; the same balance is expected to hold for angular momentum.
  • Because the leading PM results are monomials in the masses, the same formulas apply, after exchanging the roles of the objects, to the absorption by the lighter body in a two-body scattering at leading order.
  • The horizon waveforms are exponentially suppressed at high frequency and lack the 1/ω soft pole that the waveforms at infinity have, so the absorbed angular momentum is insensitive to static zero-frequency contributions that complicate radiated angular momentum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the horizon waveform coefficients lack the 1/ω soft pole, the absorbed angular momentum may be free of the zero-frequency ambiguities that complicate the radiated angular momentum, making it a cleaner target for comparing independent calculational methods.
  • The G^{ℓ+1} suppression of horizon multipoles suggests a general organizational rule: at each PM order only finitely many low harmonics enter near the horizon, which could let future higher-PM computations work from a handful of multipoles.
  • If the resummed velocity expressions are exact, taking the ultrarelativistic limit σ→∞ forces a partial resummation of the PM series; the paper identifies a parametric bound beyond which the naive result breaks down, and a natural next step would be to test this by computing the next PM correction.
  • Because the confluent-Heun dictionary extends to Kerr, the same method should yield spin-dependent absorbed fluxes; this is a stated possible extension of the authors and would give a direct check of the Schwarzschild limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the energy and angular momentum absorbed by a Schwarzschild black hole when a light probe (scalar, electromagnetic, or gravitational) scatters off it, working to leading order in the post-Minkowskian expansion and to leading order in the probe mass ratio. Using the confluent-Heun/Seiberg–Witten technology of [67], the authors derive horizon waveforms in terms of velocity-resummed expressions, from which they obtain spectral and total absorbed fluxes. The gravitational energy result (3.24a) matches the independent EFT computations of [68,69]; the electromagnetic and scalar energy results similarly match [69]. The new claims are the absorbed angular momentum formulas (3.24b), (3.29), and (3.36), which are stated as exact in the velocity at leading PM order. The gravitational angular momentum is checked in the nonrelativistic limit against the dissipative force of [68].

Significance. If the angular-momentum formulas are correct, this is a substantive new set of PM results: they give the leading-order spin acquired by a Schwarzschild black hole in a scattering event and provide a target for future amplitude/EFT calculations. The energy-sector agreement with independent EFT computations is a strong validation of the overall framework, including the connection formulae and source treatment. Deriving the aborbed fluxes from horizon waveforms rather than from worldline EFT is a conceptually useful cross-check. The appendices supply detailed derivations of the source terms and flux formulas, which increases confidence in the setup. However, the angular-momentum results rest entirely on an unproved all-order resummation of the velocity expansion, and the only non-velocity check (the PN limit) tests just the leading term in that expansion. The paper's central novelty therefore sits on an extrapolation that is not demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Eqs. (3.20a)–(3.20c) and (3.24b)] The closed-form velocity-resummed horizon amplitudes (3.20a)–(3.20c) are obtained by extrapolating an expansion in p_infty that, as stated in Sec. 3.3, was verified only up to relative O(p_infty^20). The new angular-momentum result (3.24b) is derived entirely from these expressions, and the electromagnetic and scalar analogues (3.29), (3.36) similarly depend on the same kind of extrapolation. No proof is given that the pattern persists to all orders, e.g. that no K2(u) terms or different u-dependence appear at higher order. This is the load-bearing step for the 'new PM result' claim. The PN check in Sec. 3.6 only fixes the leading small-p_infty coefficient and cannot validate the all-orders resummation. I ask the authors to either supply a proof of the resummation (for instance from an integral representation of the geodesic integral) or explicitly downgrade the claim to a conjecture ver
  2. [Sec. 3.3, after Eq. (3.19)] The statement that 'only the first line of (3.3) gives nonzero contributions' and that 'the same pattern continues also for the other Z^H_{ℓm,s≤0}' is not demonstrated. Since the second line of (3.3) carries different hypergeometric terms, its vanishing after κ-integration at every order is a nontrivial input. This is part of the same extrapolation issue as the previous comment and should be proved rather than asserted, or else the resulting formulas should be presented as conditional.
  3. [Sec. 3.6, Eqs. (3.41)–(3.43)] The cross-check of the angular momentum result (3.24b) in the nonrelativistic limit is a check of only the first term in a p_infty expansion of the resummed expression. It does not test the finite-velocity structure that distinguishes (3.20a)–(3.20c) from any other resummation with the same leading PN term. The energy agreement with [68,69] exercises the same framework but not the m-weighted combination that defines J_abs. Thus the new angular-momentum sector lacks an independent finite-velocity confirmation; I would treat this as an open point rather than a closed validation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, notation in (3.20a)–(3.20c)] The notation Z^H_{2(±2),-2}, etc., is compact but potentially confusing; please state explicitly that the parenthesized index refers to the magnetic quantum number m=±2, ±1, 0.
  2. [Sec. 2.6, peeling discussion] The discussion of peeling violations and static δ(ω) terms is interesting but somewhat orthogonal to the main derivation; consider moving part of it to a footnote or an appendix to improve readability.
  3. [Sec. 3.3, sentence introducing (3.19)] The sentence 'We checked the resummed expressions explicitly up to relative O(p^20_infty)' should specify which expressions were checked and whether the check was performed for all m and for each helicity sign, since later formulas rely on this statement.
  4. [Sec. 2.8, Eqs. (2.93)–(2.95)] The relative normalization factor of 2 between vector and scalar cases is stated correctly, but it would help to spell out the two polarizations explicitly at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction: J_abs is not fitted and is PN-checked against an independent force; the [67] self-citation is load-bearing but externally benchmarked, and the O(p_infty^20) resummation is an unproved extrapolation, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: Teukolsky source integrals (Sec. 2.7) -> leading-PM R_up (Sec. 3.1) -> horizon waveforms W^H (3.21a, 3.26) -> spectral fluxes (3.22-3.23) -> integrated E_abs, J_abs (3.24a,b), etc. No parameter is fitted to the final J_abs; J_abs is not defined in terms of E_abs or any other output. The energy results (3.24a), (3.29), (3.33) agree with independent EFT computations [68,69], and the gravitational angular momentum is checked in the nonrelativistic limit against the independent horizon radiation-reaction force (3.38)-(3.43). The main caveat is that the velocity-resummed forms (3.19)-(3.20c) are justified only by an explicit check to O(p_infty^20), as the paper states at Sec. 3.3: 'We checked the resummed expressions explicitly up to relative O(p_infty^20).' This is an extrapolation/omitted proof and a genuine correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction: the resummed expressions are not constructed from the J_abs they predict. The technical input from [67] (connection formulae for the confluent Heun equation) is a self-citation with substantial author overlap and is load-bearing for R_up; however, the present paper re-derives the leading-order R_up directly in the M omega << 1 limit and the framework is externally benchmarked through the energy agreement, so the citation does not reduce the central claim to itself. No fitted-input-called-prediction, self-definitional, or uniqueness-importation pattern is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No numerical free parameters are fitted; the calculation is analytic. The main unproved inputs are leading-PM Heun solutions from [67], the all-order velocity resummation, and the standard large-impact-parameter geodesic approximation.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Leading-PM solutions R_in, R_up of the confluent Heun equation are given by (3.2)-(3.3) as imported from [67].
    The paper does not re-derive these; it cites [67], whose authors overlap with the present authors.
  • ad hoc to paper The velocity series in p_infty can be resummed to the closed forms (3.20a)-(3.20c) beyond the O(p_infty^20) verification.
    The text checks only up to O(p_infty^20) and then treats the resummed expressions as the leading-PM result.
  • domain assumption At leading PM order the probe follows a straight-line geodesic (3.12)-(3.14).
    M/b corrections are suppressed; this is standard in leading-PM calculations.
  • domain assumption The Noether flux formulas (2.92)-(2.95) give the true absorbed energy and angular momentum of the horizon.
    Derived in Appendix C under standard gauge/falloff conditions; used without independent numerical verification.
  • domain assumption For r below the closest approach, only the homogeneous solution (2.55) contributes because the source is far from the horizon.
    Valid for large impact parameter; used in the horizon waveform extraction.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 34860 in / 12877 out tokens · 125447 ms · 2026-08-03T04:06:54.652610+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study perturbations induced by a light particle scattering off a Schwarzschild black hole. Exploiting recent results for the wave propagation in this geometry, we derive the fields that this process induces on the horizon to leading order in the post-Minkowskian (PM) regime, when the light probe is far from the black hole. We then use these results to calculate the fluxes of energy and angular momentum that enter the black hole. We consider the effects due to gravitational, electromagnetic and scalar radiation, finding agreement with recent computations of the absorbed energy, while the absorbed angular momentum provides a new PM result.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Horizon absorption in eccentric precessing binary black hole inspirals and its importance for gravitational wave data analysis

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First leading-PN derivation of horizon absorption in eccentric precessing BBH inspirals, incorporated into pyEFPEHM, with estimates showing parameter biases in eccentric systems at moderate SNR.

  2. Gravitational waveforms from binaries in higher-derivative gravity: a Love story

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Higher-derivative gravity corrections to binary gravitational waveforms and energy fluxes appear at 5PN order and scale universally with the black hole's ℓ=2 Love number.

  3. Gravitational waveforms from binaries in higher-derivative gravity: a Love story

    gr-qc 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    In higher-derivative gravity, the leading correction to extreme-mass-ratio inspiral waveforms and fluxes enters at 5PN order and is controlled by the ℓ=2 tidal Love number.

  4. Gravitational Sommerfeld Effects: Formalism, Renormalization, and Perturbation to $O(G^{10})$

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Closed-form Sommerfeld factor via EFT connection matrix with analytic O(G^10) magnitude and phase for l=0,1,2 waves, plus a new RG equation for radiative multipole moments that improves waveform resummation beyond tai...

  5. Resummed energy loss in extreme-mass-ratio scattering using critical orbits

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Near-separatrix logarithmic divergence, anchored by fitted unstable-circular-orbit fluxes, yields resummed formulas for energy loss in extreme-mass-ratio scattering that track exact numerical calculations to about 10-25%.

  6. Scattering amplitudes in Quadratic Graivty in a general formalism

    hep-th 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0

    For Stelle Quadratic Gravity, the paper proposes LSZ formulas built on Salvio's ghost-continuation prescription, yielding two quantization schemes whose amplitudes differ and a mode algebra with one undetermined sign.

  7. Scattering amplitudes in Quadratic Graivty in a general formalism

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Derives LSZ rules for graviton scattering in quadratic gravity using a covariant quantization that continues ghost variables to imaginary values after mean values are taken.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 94 linked inside Pith · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [3]

    General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Plant´ e, and P. Vanhove, “General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) no. 17, 171601,arXiv:1806.04920 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [4]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, “From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) no. 25, 251101,arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [5]

    Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,”Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) no. 20, 201603, arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [6]

    Revisiting the second post-Minkowskian eikonal and the dynamics of binary black holes,

    A. Koemans Collado, P. Di Vecchia, and R. Russo, “Revisiting the second post-Minkowskian eikonal and the dynamics of binary black holes,”Phys. Rev. D 100(2019) no. 6, 066028,arXiv:1904.02667 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [7]

    Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,”JHEP10 (2019) 206,arXiv:1908.01493 [hep-th]. 38

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [8]

    Post-Minkowskian Scattering Angle in Einstein Gravity,

    N. Bjerrum-Bohr, A. Cristofoli, and P. H. Damgaard, “Post-Minkowskian Scattering Angle in Einstein Gravity,”JHEP08(2020) 038,arXiv:1910.09366 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [9]

    Universality in the classical limit of massless gravitational scattering,

    Z. Bern, H. Ita, J. Parra-Martinez, and M. S. Ruf, “Universality in the classical limit of massless gravitational scattering,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) no. 3, 031601,arXiv:2002.02459 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [10]

    Second-order Post-Minkowskian scattering in arbitrary dimensions,

    A. Cristofoli, P. H. Damgaard, P. Di Vecchia, and C. Heissenberg, “Second-order Post-Minkowskian scattering in arbitrary dimensions,”JHEP07(2020) 122, arXiv:2003.10274 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [11]

    Extremal black hole scattering at O(G3): graviton dominance, eikonal exponentiation, and differential equations,

    J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, “Extremal black hole scattering at O(G3): graviton dominance, eikonal exponentiation, and differential equations,” JHEP11(2020) 023,arXiv:2005.04236 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  10. [12]

    Radiation Reaction from Soft Theorems,

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, “Radiation Reaction from Soft Theorems,”Phys. Lett. B818(2021) 136379,arXiv:2101.05772 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [13]

    Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 4),

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 4),” Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no. 17, 171601,arXiv:2101.07254 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [14]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from Reverse Unitarity,

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from Reverse Unitarity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no. 20, 201602,arXiv:2101.07255 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [15]

    The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation atO(G 3),

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, “The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation atO(G 3),”JHEP07(2021) 169,arXiv:2104.03256 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [16]

    Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes,

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, “Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes,”JHEP10(2021) 148,arXiv:2104.03957 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [17]

    The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third Post-Minkowskian order,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plant´ e, and P. Vanhove, “The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third Post-Minkowskian order,” JHEP08(2021) 172,arXiv:2105.05218 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [18]

    Waveforms from amplitudes,

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower, and D. O’Connell, “Waveforms from amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no. 5, 056007,arXiv:2107.10193 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  17. [19]

    Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,

    A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini, and C. Wen, “Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,”JHEP10(2021) 118, arXiv:2108.04216 [hep-th]. 39

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [20]

    Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),”Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) no. 16, 161103, arXiv:2112.10750 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [21]

    The gravitational eikonal: From particle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters,

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, “The gravitational eikonal: From particle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters,” Phys. Rept.1083(2024) 1–169,arXiv:2306.16488 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [22]

    One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, “One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,”JHEP06(2023) 048,arXiv:2303.06111 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [23]

    The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, “The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,”JHEP06(2023) 004,arXiv:2303.06112 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [24]

    Radiation and reaction at one loop,

    A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, M. Sergola, and I. A. Vazquez-Holm, “Radiation and reaction at one loop,”JHEP07(2024) 272,arXiv:2303.06211 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [25]

    Inelastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scattering at one loop,

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and I. Vazquez-Holm, “Inelastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scattering at one loop,”JHEP06(2023) 126, arXiv:2303.07006 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [26]

    Spinning waveforms from the Kosower-Maybee-O’Connell formalism at leading order,

    S. De Angelis, P. P. Novichkov, and R. Gonzo, “Spinning waveforms from the Kosower-Maybee-O’Connell formalism at leading order,”Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) no. 4, L041502,arXiv:2309.17429 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [27]

    Resummed spinning waveforms from five-point amplitudes,

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, “Resummed spinning waveforms from five-point amplitudes,”JHEP02(2024) 026, arXiv:2310.04405 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [28]

    An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravitational scattering waveform,

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and R. Russo, “An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravitational scattering waveform,”JHEP03(2024) 089,arXiv:2312.07452 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [29]

    Addendum to: Inelastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scattering at one loop,

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and I. Vazquez-Holm, “Addendum to: Inelastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scattering at one loop,”JHEP2024 (2024) no. 02, 161,arXiv:2312.14710 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [30]

    Post-Newtonian multipoles from the next-to-leading post-Minkowskian gravitational waveform,

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and R. Russo, “Post-Newtonian multipoles from the next-to-leading post-Minkowskian gravitational waveform,”Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) no. 10, 106020,arXiv:2402.06361 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [31]

    An improved framework for computing waveforms,

    G. Brunello and S. De Angelis, “An improved framework for computing waveforms,”JHEP07(2024) 062,arXiv:2403.08009 [hep-th]. 40

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [32]

    Logarithmic soft theorems and soft spectra,

    F. Alessio, P. Di Vecchia, and C. Heissenberg, “Logarithmic soft theorems and soft spectra,”JHEP11(2024) 124,arXiv:2407.04128 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [33]

    Analytic One-loop Scattering Waveform in General Relativity,

    G. Brunello, S. De Angelis, and D. A. Kosower, “Analytic One-loop Scattering Waveform in General Relativity,”arXiv:2511.05412 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [34]

    Asymptotic Simplicity and Scattering in General Relativity from Quantum Field Theory,

    S. De Angelis, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, “Asymptotic Simplicity and Scattering in General Relativity from Quantum Field Theory,” arXiv:2511.10637 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  33. [35]

    Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Waveforms,

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, “Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Waveforms,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) no. 14, 141401,arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [36]

    Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,”JHEP02(2021) 048,arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [37]

    Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, “Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,”Phys. Lett. B831(2022) 137203,arXiv:2106.08276 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [38]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hidden Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hidden Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) no. 1, 011101,arXiv:2106.10256 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [39]

    Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Large-Eccentricity Expansion,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, “Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Large-Eccentricity Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) no. 16, 161104,arXiv:2112.11296 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  38. [40]

    All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and B. Sauer, “All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory,”JHEP10(2022) 128, arXiv:2207.00569 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [41]

    Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, “Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) no. 10, 101401,arXiv:2210.05541 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [42]

    Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, “Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,”arXiv:2403.07781 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [43]

    Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO(G 5), and loop integration,

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, “Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO(G 5), and loop integration,”JHEP10(2024) 023,arXiv:2406.01554 [hep-th]. 41

    arXiv 2024

  42. [44]

    Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 5) without Self-Force Truncation,

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, S. Smith, and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 5) without Self-Force Truncation,”arXiv:2512.23654 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  43. [45]

    Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and Second Self-Force Order,

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, “Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and Second Self-Force Order,”arXiv:2601.16256 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [46]

    Black hole perturbation: Chapter 1,

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, M. Shibata, H. Tagoshi, and T. Tanaka, “Black hole perturbation: Chapter 1,”Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.128(1997) 1–121, arXiv:gr-qc/9712057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  45. [47]

    Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,

    L. Blanchet, “Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,”Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 2,arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [48]

    Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi, and Y. Hatsuda, “Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,”Annales Henri Poincare23(2022) no. 6, 1951–1977, arXiv:2006.06111 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [49]

    QNMs of branes, BHs and fuzzballs from quantum SW geometries,

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, and J. F. Morales, “QNMs of branes, BHs and fuzzballs from quantum SW geometries,”Phys. Lett. B824(2022) 136837, arXiv:2105.04245 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  48. [50]

    More on the SW-QNM correspondence,

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, and J. F. Morales, “More on the SW-QNM correspondence,”JHEP01(2022) 024,arXiv:2109.09804 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [51]

    Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers,

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, “Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers,”Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no. 4, 044047, arXiv:2105.04483 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [52]

    Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection Formulae for Heun Functions,

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, “Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection Formulae for Heun Functions,”Commun. Math. Phys.397(2023) no. 2, 635–727,arXiv:2201.04491 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [53]

    CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, superradiance, echoes and tidal responses,

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, and R. Poghossian, “CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, superradiance, echoes and tidal responses,”JHEP12 (2022) 115,arXiv:2206.09437 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [54]

    Black hole perturbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton amplitudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions,

    Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini, and Z. Zhou, “Black hole perturbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton amplitudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions,”Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no. 8, 084071, arXiv:2312.05965 [hep-th]. 42

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [55]

    Black hole perturbation theory and multiple polylogarithms,

    G. Aminov, P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, A. Grassi, and A. Tanzini, “Black hole perturbation theory and multiple polylogarithms,”JHEP11(2023) 059, arXiv:2307.10141 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [56]

    Regular and Floquet bases for gauge and gravity theories: a non perturbative approach,

    D. Fioravanti and M. Rossi, “Regular and Floquet bases for gauge and gravity theories: a non perturbative approach,”arXiv:2508.19960 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [57]

    Post Newtonian emission of gravitational waves from binary systems: a gauge theory perspective,

    F. Fucito and J. F. Morales, “Post Newtonian emission of gravitational waves from binary systems: a gauge theory perspective,”JHEP03(2024) 106, arXiv:2311.14637 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [58]

    Gravitational wave forms for extreme mass ratio collisions from supersymmetric gauge theories,

    F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, and R. Russo, “Gravitational wave forms for extreme mass ratio collisions from supersymmetric gauge theories,”Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) no. 4, 044054,arXiv:2408.07329 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [59]

    Gravitational self-force corrections to gyroscope precession along circular orbits in the Kerr spacetime,

    D. Bini, T. Damour, A. Geralico, C. Kavanagh, and M. van de Meent, “Gravitational self-force corrections to gyroscope precession along circular orbits in the Kerr spacetime,”Phys. Rev. D98(2018) no. 10, 104062, arXiv:1809.02516 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [60]

    Detweiler’s redshift invariant for extended bodies orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole,

    D. Bini, A. Geralico, and J. Steinhoff, “Detweiler’s redshift invariant for extended bodies orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole,”Phys. Rev. D102(2020) no. 2, 024091,arXiv:2003.12887 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [61]

    Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG,

    T. Damour, “Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG,”Phys. Rev. D102(2020) no. 12, 124008,arXiv:2010.01641 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  60. [62]

    The Generation of Gravitational Waves. 3. Derivation of Bremsstrahlung Formulas,

    S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne, “The Generation of Gravitational Waves. 3. Derivation of Bremsstrahlung Formulas,”Astrophys. J.217(1977) 252–280

    1977

  61. [63]

    The Generation of Gravitational Waves. 4. Bremsstrahlung,

    S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne, “The Generation of Gravitational Waves. 4. Bremsstrahlung,”Astrophys. J.224(1978) 62–85

    1978

  62. [64]

    Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) no. 20, 201103,arXiv:2101.12688 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  63. [65]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory,

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva, and F. Vernizzi, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory,”Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no. 2, 024041,arXiv:2102.08339 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [66]

    What can be measured asymptotically?,

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir, and S. Mizera, “What can be measured asymptotically?,”JHEP01(2024) 139,arXiv:2308.02125 [hep-th]. 43

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  65. [67]

    Resumming post-Minkowskian and post-Newtonian gravitational waveform expansions,

    A. Cipriani, G. Di Russo, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, H. Poghosyan, and R. Poghossian, “Resumming post-Minkowskian and post-Newtonian gravitational waveform expansions,”SciPost Phys.19(2025) no. 2, 057,arXiv:2501.19257 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  66. [68]

    Horizon radiation reaction forces,

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, “Horizon radiation reaction forces,”JHEP 10(2020) 026,arXiv:2007.00731 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  67. [69]

    Absorptive effects and classical black hole scattering,

    C. R. T. Jones and M. S. Ruf, “Absorptive effects and classical black hole scattering,”JHEP03(2024) 015,arXiv:2310.00069 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [70]

    Absorptive effects in black hole scattering,

    Y. F. Bautista, Y.-T. Huang, and J.-W. Kim, “Absorptive effects in black hole scattering,”Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no. 4, 044043,arXiv:2411.03382 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [71]

    Classical Spin Transitions and Absorptive Scattering,

    J. P. Gatica and C. R. T. Jones, “Classical Spin Transitions and Absorptive Scattering,”arXiv:2511.19601 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  70. [72]

    Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,

    S. A. Teukolsky, “Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972) 1114–1118

    1972

  71. [73]

    Instantons and recursion relations in N=2 SUSY gauge theory,

    M. Matone, “Instantons and recursion relations in N=2 SUSY gauge theory,” Phys. Lett. B357(1995) 342–348,arXiv:hep-th/9506102

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  72. [74]

    Matone’s relation in the presence of gravitational couplings,

    R. Flume, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, and R. Poghossian, “Matone’s relation in the presence of gravitational couplings,”JHEP04(2004) 008, arXiv:hep-th/0403057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  73. [75]

    Recursion relation for instanton counting for SU(2)N= 2 SYM in NS limit of Ω background,

    H. Poghosyan, “Recursion relation for instanton counting for SU(2)N= 2 SYM in NS limit of Ω background,”JHEP05(2021) 088,arXiv:2010.08498 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  74. [76]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269(1962) 21–52

    1962

  75. [77]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,

    R. K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270(1962) 103–126

    1962

  76. [78]

    Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,

    R. Sachs, “Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,”Phys. Rev.128 (1962) 2851–2864

    1962

  77. [79]

    On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,

    A. Strominger, “On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,”JHEP07 (2014) 152,arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  78. [80]

    ADM, BMS, and some puzzling interconnections,

    G. Veneziano, “ADM, BMS, and some puzzling interconnections,”J. Phys. A58 (2025) no. 20, 205402,arXiv:2505.11937 [gr-qc]. 44

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [81]

    Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem,”JHEP07(2015) 115,arXiv:1505.05346 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [82]

    Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

    A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory. Princeton University Press, 2018.arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.