pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.06027 · v2 · pith:CTA6HNWSnew · submitted 2026-02-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

ACT DR6+Planck impact on inflation with non-zero vacuum expectation value and the post-inflationary behavior

F. B. M. dos Santos , J. G. Rodrigues , G. Rodrigues , C. Siqueira , J. S. Alcaniz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 13:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords inflationvacuum expectation valueoscillonspreheatingreheatinggravitational wavescosmic microwave background
0
0 comments X

The pith

New CMB data favors a small non-zero vacuum expectation value for the inflaton, around 0.003 times the Planck mass, opening post-inflationary oscillon production.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how recent cosmic microwave background observations tighten or relax bounds on an inflationary model that features a non-zero vacuum expectation value M during the large-field phase. Because the data prefer a higher spectral index, smaller values of M become allowed, and these values turn out to be relevant for the non-linear evolution of the inflaton after inflation ends. The authors perform lattice simulations that show the field fragments into localized, quasi-spherical oscillon-like objects, which could source gravitational waves or primordial black holes. They also examine a simple coupling to another scalar and find that the resulting reheating temperature stays inside observationally permitted ranges for the lower M values now preferred.

Core claim

Combining the latest CMB power-spectrum measurements with the model potential that includes a non-zero VEV yields log10(M/M_Pl) = -2.5^{+1.1}_{-1.3} at 68 percent , consistent with M/M_Pl approximately 0.003. Lattice evolution of the inflaton for the first few e-folds confirms the formation of localized oscillon structures, while the addition of a y phi chi squared coupling brings the perturbative reheating predictions into agreement with the full temperature window allowed by polarization data.

What carries the argument

The inflationary potential with non-zero vacuum expectation value M in the large-field regime, which simultaneously sets the primordial scalar spectrum and governs the subsequent non-linear field dynamics that produce oscillons.

If this is right

  • Lower values of M now fit the joint CMB dataset and remain compatible with BICEP/Keck polarization constraints.
  • The post-inflationary lattice evolution produces quasi-spherical localized objects identified as oscillons.
  • Oscillons in this regime can source gravitational waves whose amplitude lies inside future detector reach but whose frequency sits near the GHz band.
  • A coupling of the form y phi chi squared allows the entire reheating temperature range to be realized for the smaller M values.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If oscillons form with appreciable abundance they could leave imprints on the gravitational-wave background or on the small-scale matter power spectrum that future surveys might detect.
  • Models with comparably small VEVs should routinely include short lattice runs to check for oscillon or other non-linear relics before claiming full viability.
  • The GHz frequency mismatch suggests that any gravitational-wave signal from this channel would require detectors operating well above current planned bands.

Load-bearing premise

The specific shape of the potential with non-zero VEV is assumed to describe both the generation of CMB fluctuations and the later non-linear evolution of the inflaton on the lattice.

What would settle it

A future CMB measurement returning a spectral index low enough to push the allowed M above 0.01 Planck units, or a lattice run at the reported best-fit M that shows no formation of localized oscillon structures, would remove the claimed compatibility.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.06027 by C. Siqueira, F. B. M. dos Santos, G. Rodrigues, J. G. Rodrigues, J. S. Alcaniz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scalar spectral index ns as a function of the mass scale M (blue curve). The upper axis shows the cor￾responding values for the tensor-to-scalar ratio r, for which the Planck+BK18 limit is shown as the black vertical line, while the green and gray horizontal bands correspond to the 95% confidence level (C.L.) limits on ns given by Planck and Planck+ACT, respectively. ACT were made available. While being a … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 68% and 95% confidence level constraints on the WR model, for a Planck+ACT+BK18+DESI analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two-dimensional confidence contours for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The evolution of the background field χ for the WR model, as a function of the redefined time τ , for three distinct values of the normalized mass scale m = 0.1 (blue), m = 0.05 (red), and m = 0.01 (purple). the momenta to be captured in our simulations; on the other hand, for m = 0.05, since the field only goes back into the tachyonic region once, we find only a slight am￾plification of modes at K ∼ 10, b… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Power spectrum of fluctuations for the WR model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Snapshots of the lattice simulation for the WR model for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The GW physical density spectrum with frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The scalar spectral index ns as a function of the coupling to bosons y, for the WR model with selected values of M, as shown by the colored curves, for which the solid and dotted curves represent a corresponding value of the tensor-to-scalar ratio r above and below the BK18 limit, r < 0.038. The dashed black curves represent the lower limit on the reheating temperature imposed by the BBN and the limit for … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The impact of the most recent cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) is studied for a model of cosmic inflation which predicts a non-zero vacuum expectation value (VEV) $M$ for a large-field regime. Since lower values of $M$ are compatible with the higher spectral index $n_s$ provided by the ACT+Planck joint analysis, we establish new limits on this parameter while also considering further CMB data from the latest BICEP/Keck Array release for CMB polarization modes. We find $\log_{10}M/M_{Pl}=-2.5^{+1.1}_{-1.3}$ at 68\% confidence level, compatible with $M/M_{Pl}\simeq 0.003$, which is interesting for post-inflationary processes, such as preheating. We conduct a lattice simulation for the inflaton field for the first few e-folds, as the model is compatible with the production of relics such as oscillons, which are possible candidates as sources of gravitational waves and primordial black holes. We find that the model indeed produces localized, quasi-spherical structures compatible with oscillons, which might lead to signatures detectable by future experiments. However, in agreement with recent works, we find that although the abundance of gravitational waves that could be generated in this regime has an amplitude well within the sensitivities of these detectors, the frequency range is on the GHz limit, away from the expected frequencies. Finally, we estimate the impact of a coupling of the type $y\phi\chi^2$ to the inflaton, in the realization of perturbative reheating, directly impacting the predictions of the model, as lower values of $M$ are consistent with both the entire allowed temperature range, and the limits imposed by BICEP/Keck Array+Planck+ACT.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines the impact of recent ACT DR6 + Planck CMB data (with BICEP/Keck polarization) on an inflationary model with non-zero VEV M in the large-field regime. It reports new constraints log_{10}(M/M_Pl) = -2.5^{+1.1}_{-1.3} (68% CL), notes compatibility with M/M_Pl ≃ 0.003 for post-inflationary processes, performs lattice simulations showing localized quasi-spherical structures interpreted as oscillons, discusses GHz-frequency gravitational waves, and considers a y ϕ χ² coupling for perturbative reheating.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies updated observational limits on M using the latest CMB data and explores links to post-inflationary relics (oscillons, GWs, PBHs). Explicit credit is given for incorporating ACT DR6 data and attempting to connect the CMB posterior to lattice evolution and reheating, which are strengths when the parameter propagation is demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [lattice simulation and post-inflationary discussion] Lattice simulation description: the text does not demonstrate that the value of M (or the initial field amplitude/velocity at the end of inflation) is taken from the reported CMB posterior log_{10} M/M_Pl = -2.5^{+1.1}_{-1.3}; without this propagation the claim that the observationally allowed regime produces oscillons rests on an unverified assumption that the same potential governs both epochs.
  2. [perturbative reheating section] Reheating analysis: the statement that lower M values are consistent with the full allowed temperature range and BICEP/Keck+Planck+ACT limits is presented without a quantitative mapping from the CMB likelihood through the y ϕ χ² coupling to the reheating temperature; this link is load-bearing for the final claim on model predictions.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions for the lattice results should explicitly state the M value adopted in the run.
  2. Notation for the inflationary potential in the large-field regime could be introduced with a single equation reference in the introduction for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [lattice simulation and post-inflationary discussion] Lattice simulation description: the text does not demonstrate that the value of M (or the initial field amplitude/velocity at the end of inflation) is taken from the reported CMB posterior log_{10} M/M_Pl = -2.5^{+1.1}_{-1.3}; without this propagation the claim that the observationally allowed regime produces oscillons rests on an unverified assumption that the same potential governs both epochs.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. While the lattice simulations were carried out using a value of M consistent with the CMB constraints (specifically M/M_Pl ≈ 0.003, which is within the reported 68% CL range), we acknowledge that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit demonstration of how the initial conditions are derived from the posterior. In the revised manuscript, we will add text and possibly a table or figure illustrating the mapping from the CMB posterior to the field value and velocity at the onset of the lattice simulation. This will solidify the link between the inflationary constraints and the post-inflationary dynamics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [perturbative reheating section] Reheating analysis: the statement that lower M values are consistent with the full allowed temperature range and BICEP/Keck+Planck+ACT limits is presented without a quantitative mapping from the CMB likelihood through the y ϕ χ² coupling to the reheating temperature; this link is load-bearing for the final claim on model predictions.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that a quantitative mapping is important for the robustness of the reheating claims. We will revise the manuscript to include a quantitative analysis showing the reheating temperature as a function of M for different values of the coupling y, and how this relates to the CMB posterior on M. This will provide the explicit connection from the likelihood to the reheating temperature and confirm the consistency with the allowed temperature range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; CMB fit and lattice simulation are independent analyses

full rationale

The paper first constrains the inflaton VEV parameter M by fitting the large-field potential to the scalar spectral index ns from the ACT DR6 + Planck joint likelihood (plus BICEP/Keck polarization), obtaining the reported posterior log10(M/M_Pl) = -2.5^{+1.1}_{-1.3}. It then performs a separate lattice simulation of the inflaton field evolution for the first few e-folds after inflation to check for localized quasi-spherical structures. These steps rely on distinct inputs: the CMB power-spectrum data for the parameter posterior, and the classical field equations plus chosen initial conditions for the numerical evolution. No result is obtained by renaming a fitted quantity as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and the oscillon finding is a direct numerical outcome rather than a re-derivation of the CMB constraint. The statement that small M is 'interesting for post-inflationary processes' follows from the data-allowed range but does not reduce the simulation output to the fit by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard slow-roll inflation assumptions, the chosen potential form, and numerical lattice methods; M is fitted directly to data and oscillons are generated within the simulation.

free parameters (2)
  • M = 10^{-2.5} M_Pl
    Vacuum expectation value fitted to match the observed spectral index from ACT+Planck data.
  • y
    Coupling strength in the reheating term y phi chi^2 explored for consistency with temperature bounds.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Slow-roll inflation and standard CMB power-spectrum calculation hold for the chosen potential.
    Invoked to translate the VEV into a spectral-index prediction.
  • domain assumption Lattice discretization accurately captures non-linear inflaton dynamics leading to oscillon formation.
    Required for the post-inflationary simulation results.
invented entities (1)
  • Oscillons no independent evidence
    purpose: Localized quasi-spherical oscillating structures formed after inflation.
    Generated in the lattice simulation as possible sources of GW and PBH.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5903 in / 1646 out tokens · 58983 ms · 2026-05-21T13:35:31.621574+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    307683/2022-2 and FAPERJ grant 299312 (2023)

    JSA is supported by CNPq No. 307683/2022-2 and FAPERJ grant 299312 (2023)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B91, 99 (1980)

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D23, 347 (1981)

    work page 1981

  4. [4]

    A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B108, 389 (1982)

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    Albrecht, P

    A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1437 (1982)

    work page 1982

  6. [6]

    L. F. Abbott, E. Farhi, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 117, 29 (1982)

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    Reheating after Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3195 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9405187

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  8. [8]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D56, 3258 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9704452

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    Gleiser, Phys

    M. Gleiser, Phys. Rev. D49, 2978 (1994), arXiv:hep- ph/9308279

    work page arXiv 1994

  10. [10]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Gleiser, and H. R. Muller, Phys. Rev. D52, 1920 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9503217

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1920

  11. [11]

    M. A. Amin and D. Shirokoff, Phys. Rev. D81, 085045 (2010), arXiv:1002.3380 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    M. A. Amin, R. Easther, H. Finkel, R. Flauger, and M. P. Hertzberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 241302 (2012), arXiv:1106.3335 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser, and J. Karouby, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530003 (2014), arXiv:1410.3808 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Gravitational waves from oscillons after inflation

    S. Antusch, F. Cefala, and S. Orani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 011303 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 120, 219901 (2018)], arXiv:1607.01314 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    K. D. Lozanov and M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. D97, 023533 (2018), arXiv:1710.06851 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Primordial Black Holes from Inflaton Fragmentation into Oscillons

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, and V. Takhistov, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083513 (2018), arXiv:1801.03321 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Antusch, F

    S. Antusch, F. Cefal` a, and F. Torrent´ ı, JCAP10, 002, arXiv:1907.00611 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1907

  18. [18]

    Piani and J

    M. Piani and J. Rubio, JCAP12, 002, arXiv:2304.13056 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Mahbub and S

    R. Mahbub and S. S. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D108, 063524 (2023), arXiv:2303.07503 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Kasai and N

    K. Kasai and N. Kitajima, (2025), arXiv:2510.25300 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    S.-Y. Zhou, E. J. Copeland, R. Easther, H. Finkel, Z.-G. Mou, and P. M. Saffin, JHEP10, 026, arXiv:1304.6094 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Gravitational Waves from Oscillons with Cuspy Potentials

    J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and G. Shiu, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 031301 (2018), arXiv:1707.09841 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    What can we learn from the stochastic gravitational wave background produced by oscillons?

    S. Antusch, F. Cefala, and S. Orani, JCAP03, 032, arXiv:1712.03231 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    K. D. Lozanov and M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. D99, 123504 (2019), arXiv:1902.06736 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Hiramatsu, E

    T. Hiramatsu, E. I. Sfakianakis, and M. Yamaguchi, JHEP03, 021, arXiv:2011.12201 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    K. D. Lozanov and V. Takhistov, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 181002 (2023), arXiv:2204.07152 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Drees and C

    M. Drees and C. Wang, JCAP04, 078, arXiv:2501.13811 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Louis and others (The Atacama Cosmology Tele- scope collaboration), Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics2025(11), 062

    T. Louis and others (The Atacama Cosmology Tele- scope collaboration), Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics2025(11), 062

    work page

  29. [29]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), JCAP02, 021, arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, Phys. Rev. D112, 023544 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    E. G. M. Ferreira, E. McDonough, L. Balkenhol, R. Kallosh, L. Knox, and A. Linde, Phys. Rev. D , (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    M. R. Haque, S. Pal, and D. Paul, (2025), arXiv:2505.01517 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    The polynomial potential inflation in light of ACT observa- tions,

    Z.-Z. Peng, Z.-C. Chen, and L. Liu, (2025), arXiv:2505.12816 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Curvature corrections to Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT results,

    A. Addazi, Y. Aldabergenov, and S. V. Ketov, Phys. Lett. B869, 139883 (2025), arXiv:2505.10305 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    The early universe isACT-ingwarm,

    A. Berera, S. Brahma, Z. Qiu, R. O. Ramos, and G. S. Rodrigues, JCAP11, 059, arXiv:2504.02655 [hep-th]. 12

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Q. Gao, Y. Gong, Z. Yi, and F. Zhang, Phys. Dark Univ. 50, 102106 (2025), arXiv:2504.15218 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Starobinsky like inflation and EGB Gravity in the light of ACT,

    Yogesh, A. Mohammadi, Q. Wu, and T. Zhu, JCAP10, 010, arXiv:2505.05363 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    L. Liu, Z. Yi, and Y. Gong, (2025), arXiv:2505.02407 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Refined predictions for Starobinsky inflation and post-inflationary constraints in light of ACT,

    M. Drees and Y. Xu, Phys. Lett. B867, 139612 (2025), arXiv:2504.20757 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    ACT, SPT, and chaotic inflation,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 161001 (2025), arXiv:2503.21030 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    O’Raifeartaigh, Nucl

    L. O’Raifeartaigh, Nucl. Phys. B96, 331 (1975)

    work page 1975

  44. [44]

    Witten, Phys

    E. Witten, Phys. Lett. B105, 267 (1981)

    work page 1981

  45. [45]

    Albrecht, S

    A. Albrecht, S. Dimopoulos, W. Fischler, E. W. Kolb, S. Raby, and P. J. Steinhardt, Nucl. Phys. B229, 528 (1983)

    work page 1983

  46. [46]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Phys. Dark Univ. 5-6, 75 (2014), arXiv:1303.3787 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    Artymowski and I

    M. Artymowski and I. Ben-Dayan, Symmetry12, 806 (2020), arXiv:1908.07052 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    F. B. M. d. Santos and R. Silva, JCAP08(08), 002, arXiv:2204.13694 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    F. B. M. d. Santos, R. Silva, and J. S. Alcaniz, JCAP07, 027, arXiv:2306.07260 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Drewes and L

    M. Drewes and L. Ming, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 031001 (2024), arXiv:2208.07609 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, Astrophys. J. 538, 473 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  52. [52]

    CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology

    C. Howlett, A. Lewis, A. Hall, and A. Challinor, JCAP 04, 027, arXiv:1201.3654 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Torrado and A

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.019 (2019), ascl:1910.019

    work page 1910

  54. [54]

    Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, JCAP05, 057, arXiv:2005.05290 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  55. [55]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A1 (2020), arXiv:1807.06205 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP, Keck), Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts

    P. Adeet al.(Simons Observatory), JCAP02, 056, arXiv:1808.07445 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Mission design of LiteBIRD

    T. Matsumuraet al., J. Low Temp. Phys.176, 733 (2014), arXiv:1311.2847 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Probing Cosmic Infla- tion with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey,

    E. Allyset al.(LiteBIRD), PTEP2023, 042F01 (2023), arXiv:2202.02773 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    M. A. Amin, R. Easther, and H. Finkel, JCAP12, 001, arXiv:1009.2505 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    G. N. Felder, J. Garcia-Bellido, P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 011601 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0012142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  63. [63]

    Lattice study of classical inflaton decay

    T. Prokopec and T. G. Roos, Phys. Rev. D55, 3768 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9610400

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  64. [64]

    E. J. Copeland, S. Pascoli, and A. Rajantie, Phys. Rev. D65, 103517 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0202031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  65. [65]

    D. I. Podolsky, G. N. Felder, L. Kofman, and M. Peloso, Phys. Rev. D73, 023501 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0507096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  66. [66]

    A Gravitational Wave Background from Reheating after Hybrid Inflation

    J. Garcia-Bellido, D. G. Figueroa, and A. Sastre, Phys. Rev. D77, 043517 (2008), arXiv:0707.0839 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  67. [67]

    J. R. C. Cuissa and D. G. Figueroa, JCAP06, 002, arXiv:1812.03132 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    J. Kim, Z. Yang, and Y.-l. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D112, 043534 (2025), arXiv:2503.16907 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    T. Jia, Y. Sang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D111, 083531 (2025), arXiv:2409.04046 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti, and W. Valken- burg, JCAP04, 035, arXiv:2006.15122 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2006

  71. [71]

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti, and W. Valken- burg, Comput. Phys. Commun.283, 108586 (2023), arXiv:2102.01031 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, and F. Torrenti, Rept. Prog. Phys.87, 094901 (2024), arXiv:2312.15056 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    F. Dux, A. Florio, J. Klari´ c, A. Shkerin, and I. Timiryasov, JCAP09, 015, arXiv:2203.13286 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Iguaz Juan, P. D. Serpico, and M. Taoso, Phys. Rev. D111, 083521 (2025), arXiv:2406.09122 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Schmitz, JHEP01, 097, arXiv:2002.04615 [hep-ph]

    K. Schmitz, JHEP01, 097, arXiv:2002.04615 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2002

  76. [76]

    Equation of state during (p)reheating with trilinear interactions

    S. Antusch, K. Marschall, and F. Torrenti, JCAP11, 002, arXiv:2507.13465 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    Constraints on \alpha-attractor inflation and reheating

    Y. Ueno and K. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D93, 083524 (2016), arXiv:1602.07427 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    CMB constraints on the inflaton couplings and reheating temperature in $\alpha$-attractor inflation

    M. Drewes, J. U. Kang, and U. R. Mun, JHEP11, 072, arXiv:1708.01197 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    Drewes, L

    M. Drewes, L. Ming, and I. Oldengott, JCAP05, 081, arXiv:2303.13503 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    S. Das, U. Kumar, S. S. Mishra, and V. Sahni, (2025), arXiv:2511.23219 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025