Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 88 references

Tensor-network contractions identify the Z_N deconfinement transition with the predicted clock-model universality classes, including an emergent U(1) phase for N=5, and locate the zero-temperature critical point.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 23:33 UTC pith:APU7UVHF

load-bearing objection Solid tensor-network study, worth refereeing; the N=3 zero-T extrapolation needs a convergence check before the quoted error bars are taken seriously. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.13124 v3 pith:APU7UVHF submitted 2026-02-13 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lat

Deconfinement from Thermal Tensor Networks: Universal CFT signature in (2+1)-dimensional mathbb{Z}_N lattice gauge theory

Adwait Naravane , Yuto Sugimoto , Shinichiro Akiyama , Jutho Haegeman , Atsushi Ueda This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lat
keywords Z_N lattice gauge theorydeconfinement transitionthermal tensor networkstensor network renormalizationcenter-symmetry universality conjectureconformal field theory datacentral chargeBKT transition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that a sign-problem-free tensor-network contraction of a (2+1)-dimensional Z_N lattice gauge theory can go beyond thermodynamic averages and directly read off the universal conformal field theory data of the deconfinement transition. For N=2 and 3 it extracts central charges and scaling dimensions matching the two-dimensional critical clock-model universality classes (central charge 1/2 and 4/5, respectively), supporting the center-symmetry universality conjecture at the level of CFT data. For N=5 it finds a plateau of central charge 1 and crossings of the parameter K at 1/K=8/25 and 1/2, which is the signature of an intermediate phase with emergent U(1) symmetry. It also determines finite-temperature critical couplings from a partition-function ratio that counts ground-state degeneracy, and by extrapolating those couplings to infinite temporal extent obtains zero-temperature deconfinement coupling estimates for N=2 and 3 that agree with earlier Monte Carlo results. If the calculation is sound, universal critical data and zero-temperature deconfinement points become accessible with tensor networks in regimes where Monte Carlo is difficult.

Core claim

Contracted in the temporal direction with full-update optimal projectors and then coarse-grained spatially, the thermal tensor network yields a renormalized transfer matrix whose low-energy spectrum is interpreted as the spectrum of a two-dimensional conformal field theory. Reading off the central charge and scaling dimensions from that spectrum, the authors obtain c=0.5 and c=0.8 for N=2 and N=3 respectively, with scaling dimensions at the known critical values, and therefore identify the thermal deconfinement transitions as belonging to those universality classes. For N=5 they find a central-charge plateau c=1 and a parameter K that crosses 1/K=8/25 and 1/2 at two couplings, the signature

What carries the argument

The central object is the thermal tensor-network representation of the Z_N Wilson partition function: character-expanded plaquette weights are assembled into local tensors with spatial bond dimension N, making the finite-temperature partition function a three-dimensional tensor network. The temporal direction is contracted with a full-update scheme in which projectors are optimized against the entire temporal column with periodic boundary conditions, rather than a local environment; this is the key algorithmic addition. Spatial coarse-graining with tensor-network renormalization then produces a single renormalized tensor, from which a transfer matrix on a cylinder is formed by tracing one sp

Load-bearing premise

The quoted universal data and critical couplings assume that the truncated tensor contractions—temporal full-update at bond dimensions up to 120 and spatial coarse-graining up to 120—represent the exact renormalized transfer matrix within the stated error bars; the paper itself reports deviations it attributes to finite bond dimension.

What would settle it

The cleanest single test is to recompute the Z_5 theory at L_z=3 around beta=1.838 and beta=1.907 with doubled bond dimension and measure the scaling dimension Delta_1: if 1/K no longer passes through 8/25 and 1/2 at two distinct couplings, the emergent-U(1) intermediate phase claim is refuted.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For N=2 and N=3, the thermal deconfinement transition is established at the level of CFT data: central charge and scaling dimensions match the critical two-dimensional clock models, not just the symmetry-based expectation.
  • For N=5, the predicted intermediate phase with emergent U(1) symmetry is realized, with two BKT transitions whose locations can be read off from the parameter K.
  • Finite-temperature critical couplings from the partition-function ratio are consistent between the gauge and dual-spin representations, numerically supporting the gauge/clock-model duality.
  • Extrapolating these couplings to infinite temporal extent yields zero-temperature deconfinement points for N=2 and N=3, a benchmark previously available only through Monte Carlo or by mapping to three-dimensional spin-model critical temperatures.
  • The full-update temporal contraction is the enabling ingredient for the low-temperature extrapolation: a local-update variant gives a zero-temperature coupling inconsistent with Monte Carlo results.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to apply the same two-stage contraction to finite-density or non-abelian gauge theories, where Monte Carlo faces sign problems; the main obstacle is the growth of the local state space.
  • The N=3 discrepancy between the gauge-representation exponent (nu=0.491(13)) and the expected 1/3 could serve as a controlled diagnostic for truncation error; tracking how this difference shrinks with bond dimension would sharpen the extrapolation method.
  • The Z_5 identification through specific rational values of 1/K could be tested independently by computing the phase stiffness or higher scaling dimensions at the proposed transition couplings.
  • The success of reading CFT data from a renormalized transfer matrix suggests that further universal information, such as operator content beyond the lowest dimensions, may be extractable for gauge theories without a Lagrangian formulation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a thermal tensor-network approach to (2+1)-dimensional Z_N lattice gauge theories: after writing the partition function as a three-dimensional tensor network, the temporal direction is contracted with a full-update TTNR scheme and the remaining spatial network is coarse-grained with Loop-TNR or BW-TRG. From the spectrum of the renormalized transfer matrix the authors extract central charges and scaling dimensions, and use them to identify the finite-temperature deconfinement transitions. They report that N=2 and N=3 transitions match the 2D Ising and 3-state Potts CFTs, respectively, while N=5 displays an intermediate phase with emergent U(1) symmetry and BKT endpoints. Critical couplings are independently estimated with Gu–Wen ratios, and finite-temperature results are extrapolated to zero temperature using Eq. (4.2), yielding β*_c=0.76139(13) (N=2) and 1.08538(16) (N=3, gauge representation) or 1.08455(8) (N=3, dual representation).

Significance. If the numerical convergence is controlled, this is a valuable demonstration that tensor networks can extract universal CFT data from lattice gauge theories without a sign problem and can test the Svetitsky–Yaffe conjecture quantitatively. The N=5 intermediate-phase evidence (c=1 plateau, volume-insensitive continuous Gu–Wen ratio) is an important positive result, and the explicit comparison of gauge and dual representations is a useful internal cross-check. The paper is also careful to report fit errors and to identify where bond-dimension effects are suspected. However, the zero-temperature extrapolation for N=3 — one of the headline claims — currently rests on fits whose systematic errors are not quantified, and the quoted sub-percent uncertainties are therefore not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.3, Table 3, Eq. (4.2), Fig. 9] The zero-temperature extrapolation is the least controlled part of the paper. For N=3, the gauge-representation fit gives β*_c=1.08538(16) with ν=0.491(13), while the dual-spin fit gives β*_c=1.08455(8) with ν=0.334(7); high-precision MC gives β*_c=1.084314(8), with ν=1/3 expected for the 3D three-state Potts model. The gauge result is ~7σ above MC and its ν is incompatible with 1/3. The discrepancy between representations is already visible in Table 3 for L_z≥5 (e.g., L_z=6: 1.07685 vs 1.07875), far exceeding the quoted 5×10^{-5} errors. Attributing this to bond dimension is plausible, but no χ_TTNR/χ_BW-TRG extrapolation is shown that demonstrates convergence; the robustness test in Fig. 14 is for N=2 only. The abstract's statement that zero-T transition points are determined and agree with MC is therefore not supported at the stated precision for N=3.
  2. [§4.1, Table 1] For N=5, the transition points β_c1 and β_c2 are defined by the conditions 1/K=8/25 and 1/2, i.e., by inserting the BKT predictions. The agreement with MC in Table 1 is therefore partly by construction and should be presented as a consistency check rather than as an independent determination of the transition location. The c=1 plateau and the volume-insensitive continuous Gu–Wen ratio (Fig. 8(c)) are genuinely independent evidence for the intermediate phase and should be emphasized. A separate BKT finite-size scaling analysis (e.g., exponential correlation-length growth) would make the identification of the two transition points non-circular.
  3. [§3, Appendix B] All quoted errors on β_c are fit errors; no systematic bond-dimension extrapolation is provided for the full-update TTNR temporal contraction or the subsequent Loop-TNR/BW-TRG spatial coarse-graining. The full-update/local-update comparison in Fig. 14 is reassuring only for the N=2 dual-spin model at smaller bond dimensions; it does not control the N=3 gauge representation or the N=5 estimates. Since Section 5 itself notes that entanglement filtering is important in 3D and is not implemented here, the convergence assumption underlying the quantitative claims should be tested explicitly (e.g., β_c versus 1/χ at increasing χ) before sub-percent uncertainties are quoted.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical glitches: a stray '1' before Eq. (2.6), 'th numerical results' in Section 3, and inconsistent spelling of Loop-TNR in some figure captions.
  2. [§4.3, Eq. (4.2)] The extrapolation assumes a pure power law in L_z with fixed ν. For the 3D 3-state Potts transition, which is first-order, the functional form and possible corrections to scaling should be justified.
  3. [§5] The phrase 'first successful determination' should be softened or substantiated, given the N=3 gauge-representation discrepancy; at present this claim is stronger than the internal consistency of the data demonstrates.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Z5 transition points are located by the predicted BKT Luttinger values, so that specific agreement is partly by construction; N=2,3 analyses and the c=1 plateau / MC comparisons remain independent.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. 4.1, Fig. 7 and Table 1]
    "In Table 1, we show our estimates of βc,1 and βc,2, which are determined as the points at which 1/K takes the values 8/25 and 1/2, respectively."

    β_c,1 and β_c,2 are not first located by an independent criterion and then compared with the Svetitsky–Yaffe/clock-model prediction; they are defined as the couplings where 1/K equals the predicted BKT values 8/25 and 1/2. Hence the statement that the crossings agree with the prediction is true by construction for these two numbers. The circularity is partial: the c=1 plateau and continuously varying Gu–Wen ratio provide independent evidence for the intermediate U(1) phase, and the Table 1 comparison with Monte Carlo [66] gives an external check of the numerical locations. The N=2,3 finite- and zero-temperature analyses do not use predicted CFT values to fix their transition points.

full rationale

Most of the paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The tensor-network representations are derived exactly from the Wilson action, and the critical couplings for N=2,3 are located from central-charge peaks or Gu–Wen ratios without using the predicted Ising/Potts data to define the transition points; they are then benchmarked against independent Monte Carlo results. The zero-temperature extrapolation uses Gu–Wen critical couplings with a standard finite-size scaling form, Eq. (4.2), and is again compared with Monte Carlo, so it is not circular, although the N=3 representation-dependent discrepancy is a numerical convergence issue rather than a circularity. The self-citations to [42] and [61] are methodological and not load-bearing, since the algorithm is specified in Appendix B and its output is externally validated. The only real circular stitch is the N=5 identification: the BKT endpoints are defined by the predicted Luttinger-parameter values, making the reported agreement with 8/25 and 1/2 a definitional consistency. Because the central c=1 signature and the MC comparisons are independent, this is a localized partial circularity, not a collapse of the paper's main reasoning.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its central claims rely on standard CFT benchmark values, the transfer-matrix/CFT dictionary, and the numerical convergence of the tensor-network contractions. The free parameters are fit parameters of the finite-size scaling extrapolation, not model parameters.

free parameters (3)
  • β*_c (zero-temperature critical inverse gauge coupling) = 0.76139(13) for N=2, 1.08538(16) for N=3 (gauge rep)
    Fit intercept in Eq. (4.2) to finite-L_z β_c(L_z) data; this is the central output of the zero-temperature extrapolation.
  • ν (critical exponent of 3D transition) = 0.611(8)/0.614(8) for N=2; 0.491(13)/0.334(7) for N=3
    Slope exponent in Eq. (4.2); fitted, not fixed, and one value deviates from the expected 1/3 for N=3.
  • c (amplitude in the L_z scaling fit) = not tabulated
    Together with β*_c and ν, these three parameters determine the extrapolated transition point.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The spectrum of the renormalized transfer matrix obtained from the fixed-point tensor yields the central charge and scaling dimensions of the underlying CFT
    Used throughout Sec. 4.1; based on Ref. [43] and the cylinder geometry. If this map is not exact for approximate contractions, the extracted c and Δ are biased.
  • domain assumption The known 2D CFT data (Ising c=1/2, Δ_σ=1/8; Potts c=4/5; clock-model Luttinger parameter K=N^2/8) are correct
    Used as benchmark values in Figs. 6–7 to identify the universality class and to locate the Z_5 BKT transitions.
  • domain assumption The Gu–Wen ratio at criticality approaches the universal value from the modular-invariant torus partition function
    Used in Sec. 4.2/Fig. 8 to identify the critical point and confirm duality; taken from Refs. [68].
  • standard math The duality transformation in Sec. 2.2 exactly maps the Z_N gauge theory partition function to the N-state clock model
    Derived explicitly in Eqs. (2.14)–(2.18); relies on standard lattice duality for Z_N theories [9,11–13].

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19832 in / 13206 out tokens · 108422 ms · 2026-08-02T23:33:26.993922+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Tensor networks offer a sign-problem-free approach to study lattice gauge theories, but extracting precise universal information associated with the deconfinement transition remains challenging. In this work, we study the deconfinement transition of (2+1)-dimensional $\mathbb{Z}_N$ lattice gauge theories at finite temperature using a thermal tensor network approach, where the partition functions at finite temperature are formulated as three-dimensional tensor networks. These tensor networks are first contracted in the temporal direction, and the subsequent coarse-graining in the spatial directions yields a renormalized transfer matrix, the spectrum of which directly encodes the universal conformal field theory data. In particular, by numerically extracting the central charge and scaling dimensions, we verify that the universality class of the thermal deconfinement transition matches the prediction of the Svetitsky-Yaffe conjecture for $N=2,3,5$. Moreover, we show that the $\mathbb{Z}_5$ theory at finite temperature exhibits an intermediate phase with an emergent U(1) symmetry. Critical couplings are determined via Gu-Wen ratios and agree with existing Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, extrapolating these critical couplings at finite temperature enables us to determine the deconfinement transition points for $N=2,3$ at zero temperature.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wilson,Confinement of Quarks,Phys

    K.G. Wilson,Confinement of Quarks,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2445

    1974

  2. [2]

    Elitzur,Impossibility of Spontaneously Breaking Local Symmetries,Phys

    S. Elitzur,Impossibility of Spontaneously Breaking Local Symmetries,Phys. Rev. D12 (1975) 3978

    1975

  3. [3]

    ’t Hooft,On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement,Nucl. Phys. B138(1978) 1

    1978

  4. [4]

    Polyakov,Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,Phys

    A.M. Polyakov,Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,Phys. Lett. B72 (1978) 477

    1978

  5. [5]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP 02(2015) 172 [1412.5148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Creutz,Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU(2) Gauge Theory,Phys

    M. Creutz,Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU(2) Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 2308

    1980

  7. [7]

    Creutz, L

    M. Creutz, L. Jacobs and C. Rebbi,Monte Carlo Study of Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D20(1979) 1915

    1979

  8. [8]

    Creutz,Phase Diagrams for Coupled Spin Gauge Systems,Phys

    M. Creutz,Phase Diagrams for Coupled Spin Gauge Systems,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 1006

    1980

  9. [9]

    Bhanot and M

    G. Bhanot and M. Creutz,The Phase Diagram ofZ(n) andu(1) Gauge Theories in Three-dimensions,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 2892

    1980

  10. [10]

    Bhanot and M

    G. Bhanot and M. Creutz,Ising gauge theory at negative temperatures and spin-glasses, Phys. Rev. B22(1980) 3370

    1980

  11. [11]

    Balian, J.M

    R. Balian, J.M. Drouffe and C. Itzykson,Gauge Fields on a Lattice. 2. Gauge Invariant Ising Model,Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 2098

    1975

  12. [12]

    Ukawa, P

    A. Ukawa, P. Windey and A.H. Guth,Dual Variables for Lattice Gauge Theories and the Phase Structure of Z(N) Systems,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 1013

    1980

  13. [13]

    Savit,Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems,Rev

    R. Savit,Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems,Rev. Mod. Phys.52(1980) 453

    1980

  14. [14]

    Svetitsky and L.G

    B. Svetitsky and L.G. Yaffe,Critical Behavior at Finite Temperature Confinement Transitions,Nucl. Phys. B210(1982) 423

    1982

  15. [15]

    Byrnes, P

    T. Byrnes, P. Sriganesh, R.J. Bursill and C.J. Hamer,Density matrix renormalization group approach to the massive Schwinger model,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 013002 [hep-lat/0202014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  16. [16]

    Ba˜ nuls, K

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J.I. Cirac, K. Jansen and H. Saito,Thermal evolution of the Schwinger model with Matrix Product Operators,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 034519 [1505.00279]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Buyens, J

    B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, H. Verschelde, F. Verstraete and K. Van Acoleyen,Confinement and string breaking for QED 2 in the Hamiltonian picture,Phys. Rev. X6(2016) 041040 [1509.00246]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Buyens, S

    B. Buyens, S. Montangero, J. Haegeman, F. Verstraete and K. Van Acoleyen, Finite-representation approximation of lattice gauge theories at the continuum limit with tensor networks,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 094509 [1702.08838]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Dempsey, I.R

    R. Dempsey, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu, B.T. Søgaard and B. Zan,Phase Diagram of the Two-Flavor Schwinger Model at Zero Temperature,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 031603 [2305.04437]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    E. Itou, A. Matsumoto and Y. Tanizaki,DMRG study of the theta-dependent mass spectrum in the 2-flavor Schwinger model,JHEP09(2024) 155 [2407.11391]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Arguello Cruz, G

    E. Arguello Cruz, G. Tarnopolsky and Y. Xin,Precision study of the massive Schwinger model near quantum criticality,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 034023 [2412.01902]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Fujii, K

    H. Fujii, K. Fujikura, Y. Kikukawa, T. Okuda and J.W. Pedersen,Critical behavior of the Schwinger model via gauge-invariant variational uniform matrix product states,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 094505 [2412.03569]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Shimizu and Y

    Y. Shimizu and Y. Kuramashi,Grassmann tensor renormalization group approach to one-flavor lattice Schwinger model,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 014508 [1403.0642]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Shimizu and Y

    Y. Shimizu and Y. Kuramashi,Critical behavior of the lattice Schwinger model with a topological term atθ=πusing the Grassmann tensor renormalization group,Phys. Rev. D 90(2014) 074503 [1408.0897]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Shimizu and Y

    Y. Shimizu and Y. Kuramashi,Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in lattice Schwinger model with one flavor of Wilson fermion,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 034502 [1712.07808]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    N. Butt, S. Catterall, Y. Meurice, R. Sakai and J. Unmuth-Yockey,Tensor network formulation of the massless Schwinger model with staggered fermions,Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 094509 [1911.01285]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Kanno, S

    H. Kanno, S. Akiyama, K. Murakami and S. Takeda,Grassmann tensor renormalization group for the massive Schwinger model with aθterm using staggered fermions,JHEP11 (2025) 036 [2412.08959]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Ohata,Monte Carlo study of Schwinger model without the sign problem,JHEP12(2023) 007 [2303.05481]

    H. Ohata,Monte Carlo study of Schwinger model without the sign problem,JHEP12(2023) 007 [2303.05481]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Ohata,Phase diagram near the quantum critical point in Schwinger model atθ=π: analogy with quantum Ising chain,PTEP2024(2024) 013B02 [2311.04738]

    H. Ohata,Phase diagram near the quantum critical point in Schwinger model atθ=π: analogy with quantum Ising chain,PTEP2024(2024) 013B02 [2311.04738]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Unmuth-Yockey,Gauge-invariant rotor Hamiltonian from dual variables of 3DU(1) gauge theory,Phys

    J.F. Unmuth-Yockey,Gauge-invariant rotor Hamiltonian from dual variables of 3DU(1) gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 074502 [1811.05884]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Felser, P

    T. Felser, P. Silvi, M. Collura and S. Montangero,Two-dimensional quantum-link lattice Quantum Electrodynamics at finite density,Phys. Rev. X10(2020) 041040 [1911.09693]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Bender, P

    J. Bender, P. Emonts and J.I. Cirac,Variational Monte Carlo algorithm for lattice gauge theories with continuous gauge groups: A study of (2+1)-dimensional compact QED with dynamical fermions at finite density,Phys. Rev. Res.5(2023) 043128 [2304.05916]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Wu and W.-Y

    Y. Wu and W.-Y. Liu,Accurate Gauge-Invariant Tensor-Network Simulations for Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory in (2+1)D: Ground-State and Real-Time Dynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett. 135(2025) 130401 [2503.20566]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Magnifico, T

    G. Magnifico, T. Felser, P. Silvi and S. Montangero,Lattice quantum electrodynamics in (3+1)-dimensions at finite density with tensor networks,Nature Commun.12(2021) 3600 [2011.10658]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Akiyama and Y

    S. Akiyama and Y. Kuramashi,Tensor renormalization group study of (3+1)-dimensional Z 2 gauge-Higgs model at finite density,JHEP05(2022) 102 [2202.10051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Akiyama and Y

    S. Akiyama and Y. Kuramashi,Critical endpoint of (3+1)-dimensional finite density Z 3 gauge-Higgs model with tensor renormalization group,JHEP10(2023) 077 [2304.07934]. – 26 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Sugimoto, S

    Y. Sugimoto, S. Akiyama and Y. Kuramashi,Phase structure of (3+1)-dimensional dense two-color QCD atT= 0in the strong coupling limit with tensor renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 034503 [2509.23637]

    arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Sugimoto, S

    Y. Sugimoto, S. Akiyama and Y. Kuramashi,Tensor renormalization group study of cold and dense QCD in the strong coupling limit,2601.20690

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Kuramashi and Y

    Y. Kuramashi and Y. Yoshimura,Three-dimensional finite temperature Z 2 gauge theory with tensor network scheme,JHEP08(2019) 023 [1808.08025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Robaina, M.C

    D. Robaina, M.C. Ba˜ nuls and J.I. Cirac,Simulating2 + 1D Z3 Lattice Gauge Theory with an Infinite Projected Entangled-Pair State,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 050401 [2007.11630]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Emonts, M.C

    P. Emonts, M.C. Ba˜ nuls, I. Cirac and E. Zohar,Variational Monte Carlo simulation with tensor networks of a pureZ 3 gauge theory in (2+1)d,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 074501 [2008.00882]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    A. Ueda, S. De Meyer, A. Naravane, V. Vanthilt and F. Verstraete,Global Tensor Network Renormalization for 2D Quantum systems: A new window to probe universal data from thermal transitions,2508.05406

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Tensor-Entanglement-Filtering Renormalization Approach and Symmetry Protected Topological Order,Phys. Rev. B80(2009) 155131 [0903.1069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Y. Liu, Y. Meurice, M.P. Qin, J. Unmuth-Yockey, T. Xiang, Z.Y. Xie et al.,Exact Blocking Formulas for Spin and Gauge Models,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 056005 [1307.6543]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  45. [45]

    Bazavov, Y

    A. Bazavov, Y. Meurice, S.-W. Tsai, J. Unmuth-Yockey and J. Zhang,Gauge-invariant implementation of the Abelian Higgs model on optical lattices,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 076003 [1503.08354]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Kuwahara and A

    T. Kuwahara and A. Tsuchiya,Toward tensor renormalization group study of three-dimensional non-Abelian gauge theory,PTEP2022(2022) 093B02 [2205.08883]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Meurice,Discrete aspects of continuous symmetries in the tensorial formulation of Abelian gauge theories,Phys

    Y. Meurice,Discrete aspects of continuous symmetries in the tensorial formulation of Abelian gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 014506 [2003.10986]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Levin and C.P

    M. Levin and C.P. Nave,Tensor renormalization group approach to two-dimensional classical lattice models,Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 120601 [cond-mat/0611687]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  49. [49]

    Evenbly and G

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal,Tensor Network Renormalization,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 180405 [1412.0732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    Evenbly,Algorithms for tensor network renormalization,Phys

    G. Evenbly,Algorithms for tensor network renormalization,Phys. Rev. B95(2017) 045117 [1509.07484]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Hauru, C

    M. Hauru, C. Delcamp and S. Mizera,Renormalization of tensor networks using graph independent local truncations,Phys. Rev. B97(2018) 045111 [1709.07460]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Yang, Z.-C

    S. Yang, Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Loop Optimization for Tensor Network Renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 110504 [1512.04938]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    M. Bal, M. Mari¨ en, J. Haegeman and F. Verstraete,Renormalization group flows of Hamiltonians using tensor networks,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 250602 [1703.00365]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Homma, T

    K. Homma, T. Okubo and N. Kawashima,Nuclear norm regularized loop optimization for tensor network,Phys. Rev. Res.6(2024) 043102 [2306.17479]. – 27 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Z.Y. Xie, J. Chen, M.P. Qin, J.W. Zhu, L.P. Yang and T. Xiang,Coarse-graining renormalization by higher-order singular value decomposition,Phys. Rev. B86(2012) 045139 [1201.1144]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Fishman, L

    M.T. Fishman, L. Vanderstraeten, V. Zauner-Stauber, J. Haegeman and F. Verstraete, Faster methods for contracting infinite two-dimensional tensor networks,Phys. Rev. B98 (2018) 235148 [1711.05881]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    S. Iino, S. Morita and N. Kawashima,Boundary Tensor Renormalization Group,Phys. Rev. B100(2019) 035449 [1905.02351]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Akiyama and Y

    S. Akiyama and Y. Kuramashi,Tensor renormalization group approach to (1+1)-dimensional Hubbard model,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 014504 [2105.00372]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Akiyama, Y

    S. Akiyama, Y. Kuramashi and T. Yamashita,Metal-insulator transition in (2+1)-dimensional Hubbard model with tensor renormalization group,PTEP2022(2021) 023 [2109.14149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Adachi, T

    D. Adachi, T. Okubo and S. Todo,Bond-weighted tensor renormalization group,Phys. Rev. B105(2022) L060402 [2011.01679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Ueda and M

    A. Ueda and M. Oshikawa,Finite-size and finite bond dimension effects of tensor network renormalization,Phys. Rev. B108(2023) 024413 [2302.06632]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Borisenko, V

    O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, G. Cortese, M. Gravina, A. Papa and I. Surzhikov,Critical behavior of 3D Z(N) lattice gauge theories at zero temperature,Nucl. Phys. B879(2014) 80 [1310.5997]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    Lyu and N

    X. Lyu and N. Kawashima,Lattice-reflection symmetry in tensor-network renormalization group with entanglement filtering in two and three dimensions,2510.19428

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Luttinger,An Exactly Soluble Model of a Many-Fermion System,J

    J.M. Luttinger,An Exactly Soluble Model of a Many-Fermion System,J. Math. Phys.4 (1963) 1154

    1963

  65. [65]

    Tomonaga,Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems,Prog

    S. Tomonaga,Remarks on Bloch’s Method of Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems,Prog. Theor. Phys.5(1950) 544

    1950

  66. [66]

    Borisenko, V

    O. Borisenko, V. Chelnokov, M. Gravina and A. Papa,Phase structure of 3D Z(N) lattice gauge theories at finite temperature: large-N and continuum limits,Nucl. Phys. B888(2014) 52 [1408.2780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Morita and N

    S. Morita and N. Kawashima,Multi-impurity method for the bond-weighted tensor renormalization group,Phys. Rev. B111(2025) 054433 [2411.13998]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Morita and N

    S. Morita and N. Kawashima,Tensor renormalization group calculations of partition-function ratios,2512.03395

    arXiv

  69. [69]

    Shimizu and A

    H. Shimizu and A. Ueda,Tensor network simulations for non-orientable surfaces, 2402.15507

    arXiv

  70. [70]

    Maeda and Y

    J. Maeda and Y. Tanizaki,Twisted partition functions as order parameters,JHEP08(2025) 128 [2505.16546]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Akiyama, R.G

    S. Akiyama, R.G. Jha, J. Maeda, Y. Tanizaki and J. Unmuth-Yockey,Tensor renormalization group approach to critical phenomena via symmetry-twisted partition functions,2601.02681

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    G. Li, K.H. Pai and Z.-C. Gu,Tensor-network renormalization approach to the q-state clock model,Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) 023159 [2009.10695]. – 28 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Caselle and M

    M. Caselle and M. Hasenbusch,Deconfinement transition and dimensional crossover in the 3-D gauge Ising model,Nucl. Phys. B470(1996) 435 [hep-lat/9511015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  74. [74]

    Brower and S

    R.C. Brower and S. Huang,Dynamical universality for Z(2) and Z(3) lattice gauge theories at finite temperature,Phys. Rev. D44(1991) 3911

    1991

  75. [75]

    Ferrenberg, J

    A.M. Ferrenberg, J. Xu and D.P. Landau,Pushing the limits of Monte Carlo simulations for the three-dimensional Ising model,Phys. Rev. E97(2018) 043301 [1806.03558]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Bazavov and B.A

    A. Bazavov and B.A. Berg,Normalized entropy density of the 3D 3-state Potts model,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 094506 [hep-lat/0702018]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  77. [77]

    Korthals Altes,Duality forZ(N) Gauge Theories,Nucl

    C.P. Korthals Altes,Duality forZ(N) Gauge Theories,Nucl. Phys. B142(1978) 315

    1978

  78. [78]

    T. Wada, M. Kitazawa and K. Kanaya,Lee-Yang-zero ratio method in three-dimensional Ising model,J. Phys. Soc. Jap.95(2026) 024002 [2508.20422]

    arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi,Precision Islands in the Ising andO(N) Models,JHEP08(2016) 036 [1603.04436]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    Bl¨ ote and R.H

    H.W.J. Bl¨ ote and R.H. Swendsen,First-order phase transitions and the three-state potts model,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 799

    1979

Showing first 80 references.