Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

A two-parameter family of top-down holographic confining theories with magnetic fluxes hosts a light approximate dilaton at one-tenth the confinement scale, far from any phase transition.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 22:59 UTC pith:E3EQSGZJ

load-bearing objection A careful top-down supergravity calculation with a genuinely new light-dilaton result, held back mainly by an unproven assumption about the fluctuation completeness of the truncation. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2602.14924 v2 pith:E3EQSGZJ submitted 2026-02-16 hep-th

Light dilaton from top-down holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes

Maurizio Piai , James Rucinski This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords holographic confinementlight dilatonmaximal supergravity in seven dimensionsmagnetic fluxessoliton solutionsfirst-order phase transitionfluctuation spectragauge-gravity duality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper aims to establish that a strongly coupled, confining gauge theory with a top-down holographic dual can contain a light dilaton—a spin-0 bound state whose mass is about one-tenth the confinement scale—without tuning the parameters and without sitting near a second-order transition. The theory is a circle compactification of a six-dimensional superconformal theory, deformed by two magnetic fluxes; its gravity dual is a two-parameter family of smooth soliton solutions of maximal supergravity in seven dimensions. The authors compute the free energy and identify a first-order phase transition along a square in the flux-source plane, with the confining solutions energetically preferred inside the square. They find no tachyonic instabilities in the spin-0 and spin-2 fluctuation spectra, and a probe-approximation diagnostic shows that the lightest scalar is dominated by coupling to the trace of the stress-energy tensor, identifying it as the dilaton. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a calculable string-theory-derived example in which a light dilaton emerges away from criticality—the regime most relevant for composite-Higgs and dilaton phenomenology.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that within the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation of seven-dimensional maximal supergravity, the regular soliton solutions dual to five-dimensional confining theories with two magnetic fluxes are locally stable and contain a light approximate dilaton. Over a large part of the allowed two-dimensional parameter space—not only near the first-order transition that bounds a square region in the flux plane—the lightest spin-0 gauge-invariant fluctuation has mass M_d of order M_2/10, where M_2 is the mass of the lightest spin-2 state. The dilaton identification is supported by the probe approximation: when the metric-trace part of the gauge-invariant scalar is neglected, the light

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-parameter analytic family of soliton backgrounds of the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation of seven-dimensional maximal supergravity, with functions H_i = 1 - Q_i^2/rho^4, f = -mu/rho^4 + (1/4)rho^2 H1 H2, and scalars phi_1, phi_2 determined through log(H1/H2) and log(H1 H2); conserved charges reduce the smooth, conical-singularity-free solutions to two free parameters, the two magnetic-flux sources. The spectra are extracted using the gauge-invariant fluctuation formalism for sigma-model scalars coupled to gravity, giving coupled equations for five spin-0 modes and one equation for spin-2 modes. The probe approximation—deliberately dropping the metric-trace component h fro

Load-bearing premise

The stability and dilaton conclusions assume that the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation, keeping only spin-0 and spin-2 zero-momentum fluctuations, captures the full supergravity spectrum; the paper itself notes the truncation is not generally consistent, so omitted modes could in principle harbor tachyons or mix with the light scalar.

What would settle it

Compute the full fluctuation spectrum without the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation, including vector fields and the first Kaluza-Klein mode on the compact eta circle, for a background at theta = 0 and large rho_0; a negative mass-squared anywhere in the confining region, or a lightest scalar whose mass becomes comparable to M_2 once those modes are included, would falsify the paper's stability and light-dilaton claims.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A composite scalar as light as M_d ~ 0.1 M_2 is attainable in a string-derived confining theory without tuning bare parameters, so light-dilaton model building has a concrete top-down existence proof away from criticality.
  • The first-order transition is the boundary of the stable confining region; inside the square the confining vacuum is both globally preferred and locally stable, a property not guaranteed in earlier top-down examples where tachyons accompanied the transition.
  • Because the ratio M_2/Lambda is nearly constant, mass ratios quoted in units of M_2 are equivalent to ratios in units of the physical energy scale, making the quoted hierarchy a stable, scheme-independent statement.
  • The probe-approximation test gives an operational meaning to 'dilaton': a state whose mass is missed when the coupling to the trace of the stress-energy tensor is removed; future computations can use the same test to identify dilatons in other models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the truncation's spectral completeness is eventually verified, this would be the first top-down example in which magnetic-flux parameters, rather than criticality, control the dilaton mass; a dense scan of the two-flux square could reveal where the suppression is strongest and whether it vanishes at the corners.
  • The same backgrounds could be used to compute the dilaton decay constant and couplings through two- and three-point functions; those numbers are what composite-Higgs phenomenology would need, and a 1/10 mass ratio would put such a dilaton in an experimentally interesting window.
  • The paper restricts fluctuations to zero momentum along the compact eta circle; turning on that momentum generates a Kaluza-Klein tower that might mix with the dilaton and shift its mass, so checking the first such mode is a natural extension before applying these results to phenomenology.
  • The symmetry exchanging the two fluxes maps theta to pi/2 - theta; the four sample lines suggest the suppression persists for all ratios, but the interpolation is not proven, so testing intermediate angles would determine whether M_d/M_2 is minimized at the symmetric point or along the axes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-parameter family of seven-dimensional maximal-supergravity backgrounds obtained by an SO(2)×SO(2) truncation, dimensionally reduced on a circle to six dimensions. The solutions are regular solitons with a shrinking η circle and are interpreted holographically as strongly coupled confining field theories with two magnetic fluxes. The authors compute the holographically renormalized free energy, identify a square-shaped first-order transition line in the two-source parameter plane, and compute the spin-0 and spin-2 fluctuation spectra of the soliton backgrounds. They report two main claims: (i) no tachyonic modes are found in the computed sectors over the confining parameter space; and (ii) over a large portion of that space the lightest spin-0 bound state is an approximate dilaton, with mass ratio M_d/M_2 ≃ 1/10, without fine tuning. The background solutions and fluctuation equations are presented explicitly, with analytic UV expansions, and the numerical spectra are documented with cutoff checks and a data-release reference.

Significance. If the central results hold, this is a significant top-down addition to the holographic dilaton programme: it provides an explicit, calculable example in which a light dilaton emerges away from a first-order transition and without proximity to a second-order one, in contrast with the previous catalogue of models. The paper has real strengths: the background family is given in closed form (Eqs. (40)–(44)), the gauge-invariant fluctuation formalism is set out in detail in Appendix E, the free-energy computation is explicit (Eq. (76)), and the numerical spectra are accompanied by stated UV/IR cutoffs, convergence tests in Appendix F, and a data release. I also find the reader's circularity score warranted: the dilaton ratio is a computed output rather than an input, and the probe approximation is used only as a diagnostic. The central limitation is not internal inconsistency but the restricted fluctuation sector: the no-tachyon and dilaton-identification statements are established only inside the SO(2)×SO(2)-truncated system at zero momentum on the η circle, and the paper does not demonstrate that the omitted 7D/11D modes decouple in the linearized problem.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II.A, Sec. IV, Appendix E] The stability claim is load-bearing and is not yet supported outside the truncated sector. The analysis keeps only the five scalar fluctuations of the SO(2)×SO(2)-invariant sigma model (Eq. (E15)–(E24)) and the spin-2 metric fluctuation (Eq. (88)), at zero KK momentum along η. The full 7D maximal supergravity contains additional charged scalars, the eight coset gauge bosons, and vector/KK modes that are truncated away. Footnote 7 says the truncation is consistent only for backgrounds with F^(1)∧F^(2)=0, which addresses the background equations; it does not by itself prove that linearized fluctuations of the omitted fields decouple or have positive spectrum in this background. Since the abstract and outlook state 'no evidence of local instabilities' and 'no further instabilities', the authors should either prove positivity/decoupling of the omitted sectors (e.g., by computing their kineti
  2. [Sec. II.A and Sec. IV (spectra)] The fluctuation computation also ignores KK modes along the compact η circle: the dimensional reduction explicitly sets to zero all η-dependent fluctuations and all momentum along η. In a confining soliton geometry with a shrinking circle, KK excitations along η are not automatically heavier than the spin-2 glueball scale, and they could in principle contain tachyonic or light charged states. The 'lightest spin-2 state as confinement scale' comparison is therefore made within a restricted set of modes. The paper should state this restriction explicitly in the abstract or conclusion and, ideally, estimate the η-KK spectrum or argue why these modes cannot be lighter than the computed states.
  3. [Sec. IV.A, Fig. 3(e)] The identification of the lightest spin-0 state as an approximate dilaton rests on the probe approximation, in which the contribution of the metric trace h to the gauge-invariant scalar combinations is dropped. The logic is clear and follows Ref. [52], but the paper presents only a binary diagnostic: the lightest state is missed by the probe, so it is called a dilaton, while the next-to-lightest state is captured. Since the central novelty is that this state is a dilaton with M_d/M_2 ≃ 1/10, it would strengthen the claim to quantify the mixing, for example by projecting the normalized mode onto h versus the scalar fluctuations, or by showing that the state has an approximate Killing-vector/scale-invariance interpretation. Without such a quantitative check, 'contains a substantial dilaton contribution' is reasonable but heuristic.
  4. [Sec. IV, Fig. 3 and Appendix F] The quoted ratio M_d/M_2 ≃ 1/10 is extracted from numerical spectra with stated cutoffs, but the paper does not provide error bars or a precise definition of how the ratio is read off the plots. Appendix F shows some IR-cutoff dependence, especially for the second-lightest scalar state. The main lightest-state result appears robust, but for a quantitative claim of 'one order of magnitude' the paper should state the numerical uncertainty on the ratio, or provide a table of representative eigenvalues for the four branches.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.A] Typo: 'first-oder' should be 'first-order'.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] Typo: 'could has well' should be 'could have well'.
  3. [Appendix E] The UV expansions (E25)–(E29) are extremely long; a short paragraph stating the normalization convention for the ten free parameters and how the numerical matching is performed would help reproducibility. The paper mentions this in the text, but the conventions are not fully spelled out.
  4. [Eq. (44)] The two branches denoted by '±' in A^(i)_7 are not explained in the surrounding text; a sentence connecting the sign choice to the parameter domains or to the symmetries of the system would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the light-dilaton and no-tachyon claims are computed from the explicit supergravity action and background solutions, with no fitted parameters and no self-citation chain forcing the result.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: it starts from the SO(2)xSO(2)-truncated 7D maximal supergravity action, Eq. (8)/(14), constructs closed-form soliton backgrounds, Eqs. (40)-(44), computes the holographically renormalized free energy, Eq. (78), and solves the gauge-invariant scalar and tensor fluctuation equations numerically to obtain the spectra in Fig. 3. The central ratio M_d/M_2 ~ 1/10 is an output of that eigenvalue problem; no parameter is fitted to this value, and no 'prediction' reduces to an input by the paper's own equations. The probe approximation in Sec. IV A is explicitly presented as a diagnostic tool: because the gauge-invariant combination, Eq. (E4), contains the metric trace h, dropping h and observing that the lightest state is missed is a physical inference about h contamination, not a circular definition of the dilaton mass, which is obtained from the full calculation. Footnote 7 honestly states that the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation is not in general consistent, but that statement delimits the domain of validity (backgrounds with F^(1)∧F^(2)=0) and flags a possible completeness limitation for the 'no tachyons' claim; it is a scope caveat, not a circular step. Self-citations to Refs. [43,52,53-58] supply programmatic context and the fluctuation formalism, but the spectra and phase structure are computed here from the displayed action, and no uniqueness theorem or prior result is invoked to force the light-dilaton conclusion. Hence no load-bearing step reduces by construction, and the correct finding is no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a computed consequence of an existing top-down supergravity action; no new entities are introduced and no constants are fitted to data. The main unproven inputs are the standard holographic dictionary, the restricted truncation, and the diagnostic probe approximation.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence and the holographic dictionary
    Used to interpret gravity backgrounds, free energy, and fluctuation spectra as dual strong-coupling field-theory data; standard in the field but not proven within the paper.
  • standard math The 7D maximal SO(5) gauged supergravity action and its SO(2)xSO(2) truncation
    Taken from Refs. [152-154,199]; the central action is Eq. (8) and the scalar/gauge content is fixed by this truncation.
  • domain assumption Consistency of the SO(2)xSO(2) truncation for backgrounds with F^(1)∧F^(2)=0
    Footnote 7 states the truncation is not generally consistent and is valid for solutions with F^(1)∧F^(2)=0; the paper does not prove this extends to the linearized fluctuation spectrum.
  • standard math Gauge-invariant fluctuation formalism of Refs. [44-52]
    The equations are reproduced in Appendix E, but the validity of the formalism for these soliton backgrounds is assumed from the literature.
  • domain assumption Probe approximation diagnoses dilaton coupling by omitting the metric-trace contribution
    Section IV.A: the probe spectrum failing to reproduce a state is interpreted as evidence the state is mostly dilaton; this is a diagnostic, not a rigorous proof.
  • domain assumption Numerical shooting/matching with IR cutoff converges sufficiently
    Appendix F shows convergence for selected points, but no full error estimate is provided across all the reported spectra.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 62918 in / 11159 out tokens · 117777 ms · 2026-08-02T22:59:47.980947+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A two-parameter class of higher-dimensional, strongly coupled, confining field theories in the presence of magnetic fluxes for two Abelian gauge groups admits a top-down, holographic dual description. The corresponding two-parameter family of regular background solutions of the classical equations of maximal supergravity in seven dimensions descends from maximal supergravity in eleven dimensions. We study the global and local stability properties of these solutions. We identify lines of zero-temperature first-order phase transitions, describing a polygon (a square) in the space of parameters, identified with the two fluxes. The transition separates the family of gravity solutions dual to confining theories, inside the polygon, from those outside, in which the field theory is realised in a conformal phase. In the spectrum of fluctuations of the supergravity equations, interpreted as bound states of the dual, confining field theories, we find no evidence of local instabilities (tachyons). Over a significant portion of parameter space, that extends far away from the proximity to the transition, we identify an approximate dilaton, the mass of which is one order of magnitude smaller than the scale set by confinement. Our findings complement those emerging in other holographic models discussed in the literature, in which either the dilaton mass is only mildly lower than the confinement scale (when approaching a first-order transitions), or parametrically suppressed (when reaching the proximity to a second-order one).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.14924 by James Rucinski, Maurizio Piai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Parameters and functions appearing in the soliton (confining) solutions, as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Left panel: phase diagram of the model, in the plane defined by the sources [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Top four panels: mass spectra, normalised to the mass of the lightest spin-2 fluctuation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Gravitational invariants for a selection of soliton (confining) solutions, as a function of the holographic direction, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Examples of mass spectra, normalised to the mass of the lightest spin-2 fluctuation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bound states and deconfinement from Romans supergravity with magnetic flux

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Holographic duals from Romans supergravity with Abelian magnetic flux yield confining 4D theories with a flux-driven zero-temperature deconfinement transition and a spectrum dominated by two nearly degenerate light sc...

  2. Bound states and deconfinement from Romans supergravity with magnetic flux

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Holographic analysis of Romans supergravity solutions with Abelian magnetic flux yields a family of confining 4D duals featuring a flux-driven first-order deconfinement transition and two parametrically light, nearly ...

  3. Dilatonic states, phase transitions, and criticality in holography

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 3.0

    A review of holographic examples indicating that a light dilaton appears near critical endpoints of first-order zero-temperature phase transitions, with explicit but lower-dimensional demonstrations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

229 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Upon imposing the constraint to avoid a conical singularity, the Ricci Scalar calculated for solutions along the line of phase transition, whereµ= 0 (andQ 2 1 =Q 2 2 =ϱ 4

    (ϱ4 −Q 2 2))6/5 h 15Q4 1Q4 2 + 48µϱ6 Q2 1 +Q 2 2 −32µQ 2 1Q2 2ϱ2 + 126ϱ12 Q2 1 +Q 2 2 + 23 + 6Q2 1Q2 2ϱ4 Q2 1 +Q 2 2 −3ϱ 8 3Q4 1 + 52Q2 1Q2 2 + 3Q4 2 −105ϱ 16 i .(D3) Here, the first expression is valid as long as the vector fields all vanish in the background, the second has been obtained by making use of the equations of motion, and the third by making ...

  2. [2]

    When computing the free energy of a general solution, the superpotential plays the role of a counterterm in our prescription

    +· · ·, one finds that the first-order equations are ∂ρA= 1 2 +· · ·,(B7) ∂ρϕ1,2 =−ϕ 1,2 +· · ·.(B8) By settingz=e −ρ/2, one finds thate A ∝ 1 z andϕ 1,2 ∝z 2, indicating that gravity solutions obtained as small perturbations of the AdS7 ones have a dual description in terms of deformations of a six-dimensional CFT, in the presence of two operators of dim...

  3. [3]

    Conversely, in the case of the AdS 7, domain-wall solutions, the Ricci Scalar takes on the constant value− 21 2

    is given by R(µ=0) =− 3(35ϱ8 −14ϱ 4ϱ4 0 −5ϱ 8 0) 10ϱ8 (ϱ4−ϱ4 0)2 ϱ8 1 5 .(D4) This expression diverges at the end of space, whenϱ=ϱ 0. Conversely, in the case of the AdS 7, domain-wall solutions, the Ricci Scalar takes on the constant value− 21 2 . We calculate three gravitational invariants,R,R M NRM N, andR M N P QRM N P Q, for the confining solutions. ...

  4. [4]

    Primed variables stand for derivatives in respect toρ, so that g′ =∂ ρg(ρ)

    Fluctuation equations for the scalars We report here the explicit form of the fluctuation equations used for the numerical study the results of which are reported in the body of the paper, written in terms of the variableρ. Primed variables stand for derivatives in respect toρ, so that g′ =∂ ρg(ρ). The five gauge-invariant scalar fluctuations, n aϕ1 ,a ϕ2...

  5. [5]

    + 5 √ 2A(1) 7 ′′ ) + 40e ϕ1√ 2 ϕ′ 1A(1) 7 ′ −5e ϕ1√ 2 + √ 10ϕ2 ϕ′ 1A(1) 7 ′ !# aA(1) 7 " 160 √ 2e2A+2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 (A′)2A(2) 7 ′ ∂ρ + e2A+ √ 2 5 ϕ2 40e √ 5 2 ϕ2 A(2) 7 ′ 2 √ 2A′ sinh ϕ1√ 2 +ϕ ′ 1 cosh ϕ1√ 2 + 16e √ 2 5 ϕ2 (A′)2A(2) 7 ′ (25 √ 2A′ + √ 5(2ϕ′ 2 −9χ ′)−10ϕ ′

  6. [6]

    + 5 √ 2A(2) 7 ′′ −5e √ 10ϕ2 ϕ′ 1A(2) 7 ′ + 40ϕ′ 1A(2) 7 ′ !# aA(2) 7 + " −16 √ 5e2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 A′ 2 −2e2 √ 2ϕ1 A(1) 7 ′ 2 + 2 A(2) 7 ′ 2 + e √ 2ϕ1 −1 e 8χ+ϕ2√ 10 + ϕ1√ 2 + √ 2A′e 4 √ 2 5 χ+ ϕ1√ 2 40e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 −1 χ′ − √ 5 4e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 + 8e ϕ1√ 2 −e ϕ1√ 2 + √ 10ϕ2 ϕ′ 1 + 5 4e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 + 8e ϕ1√ 2 −e ϕ1√ 2 + √ 10ϕ2 χ′e 4 √ 2 5 χ+ ϕ...

  7. [7]

    −5 −4e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 −8e ϕ1√ 2 +e ϕ1√ 2 + √ 10ϕ2 e2A+ √ 2 5 ϕ2 A(1) 7 ′ A(2) 7 ′ # aA(2) 7 +

    + √ 10A(2) 7 ′′ # e2A+2 √ 2 5 aA(2) 7 + " 160 A′ 2 e2A+ √ 2 5 (4χ+ϕ2)+ √ 2ϕ1 ∂2 ρ + 16 A′ 2 50A′ − √ 10χ′ e2A+ √ 2 5 (4χ+ϕ2)+ √ 2ϕ1 ∂ρ + 8 A′ 2 −16e2A+2 √ 2ϕ1+2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 A(1) 7 ′ 2 −16e 2A+2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 A(2) 7 ′ 2 +e 4 √ 2 5 χ+ √ 2ϕ1 20M 2e √ 2 5 (χ+ϕ2) −e 2A e √ 10ϕ2 −8 + 4 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 e 2A+ 8χ+5ϕ2√ 10 + ϕ1√ 2 −8 √ 10 4e √ 5 2 ϕ2 e √ 2ϕ1 + 1 + 8e ϕ1√ 2 −e ϕ...

  8. [8]

    In the numerical calculations of the spectra reported in the main body, we retained terms up to tenth order in these expansions

    UV Expansions We provide the leading terms in the UV expansions of the fluctuations used to improve the numerical calculation of the spectrum, in terms of variablez= 1 ϱ . In the numerical calculations of the spectra reported in the main body, we retained terms up to tenth order in these expansions. The expansions depend on ten free parameters: the domina...

  9. [9]

    + 120aϕ2 4 M 4 + 1120aϕ2 2 M 6 − 12M 2 √ 5aϕ1 2 (Q2 2 −Q 2

  10. [10]

    + 8 √ 10(a A(1) 7 0 Q1 +a A(2) 7 0 Q2)√µ + 60aϕ2 2 µ − 4 15 M 2 log[z](3 √ 5aϕ1 2 (Q1 −Q 2)(Q1 +Q 2) + 3aϕ2 2 (Q2 1 +Q 2

  11. [11]

    + 40aϕ2 2 M 4) + z10 1350 180 √ 5aϕ1 4 (Q2 2 −Q 2 1)M 2 + 3 √ 5aϕ1 2 (Q1 −Q 2)(Q1 +Q 2)(57(Q2 1 +Q 2 2)−430M 4) + −120aϕ2 4 M 2(9(Q2 1 +Q 2

  12. [12]

    + 5M4) + 24(75aϕ2 4 µ−96a χ 0 (Q2 1 +Q 2 2)µ)− 33 24 √ 10√µ 15a A(1) 7 4 Q1 + 15a A(2) 7 4 Q2 + 2(a A(1) 7 0 Q1 +a A(2) 7 0 Q2)(3(Q2 1 +Q 2 2)−5M 4) − aϕ2 2 (279Q4 1 + 279Q4 2 + 3690Q2 2M 4 + 700M8 + 18Q2 1(46Q2 2 + 205M4) + 3300M2µ) + 480M 2 log[z] 10aϕ2 2 M 6 + 3M2( √ 5aϕ1 2 (Q1 −Q 2)(Q1 +Q 2) + 6aϕ2 2 (Q2 1 +Q 2 2)+ 4 √ 10(a A(1) 7 0 Q1 +a A(2) 7 0 Q2)...

  13. [13]

    For the tensor fluctuations, the expressions are simpler, and depend on two free parameters that we denote asT 0 andT 6

    + 8( √ 10a A(1) 7 4 Q1 √µ+ √ 10a A(2) 7 4 Q2 √µ+ 4a χ 0 (Q2 1 +Q 2 2)µ))− 150aχ 0 Q2 1Q2 2M 2 + 40aχ 0 M 10(39−40 log[z])−20a χ 0 (Q2 1 +Q 2 2)M 6(23 + 120 log[z]) + 6M 4(25aχ 6 + 350aχ 0 µ−8 √ 10(a A(1) 7 0 Q1 +a A(2) 7 0 Q2)√µ) +O(z 12). For the tensor fluctuations, the expressions are simpler, and depend on two free parameters that we denote asT 0 andT...

  14. [14]

    2 √ 5e2A+2 √ 2 5 ϕ2 −e2 √ 2ϕ1 A(1) 7 ′ 2 + A(2) 7 ′ 2 + 3 e √ 2ϕ1 −1 e 8χ+ϕ2√ 10 + ϕ1√ 2 # pϕ2 +

    Probe Approximation We report here the equations obeyed by the scalar fluctuations treated in the probe approximation defined in the main body of the text. In this Appendix, we denote the fluctuations as n pϕ1 ,p ϕ2 ,p χ,p A(1) 7 ,p A(2) 7 o , to distinguish them from the gauge invariant variables. These fluctuations all obey Dirichlet boundary conditions...

  15. [15]

    Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  16. [16]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B 428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  17. [17]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  18. [18]

    Aharony, S.S

    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    Maldacena,Wilson loops in large N field theories,Phys

    J.M. Maldacena,Wilson loops in large N field theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 4859 [hep-th/9803002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  20. [20]

    Rey and J.-T

    S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee,Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C22(2001) 379 [hep-th/9803001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  21. [21]

    Brandhuber, N

    A. Brandhuber, N. Itzhaki, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Wilson loops in the large N limit at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B434(1998) 36 [hep-th/9803137]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  22. [22]

    Brandhuber, N

    A. Brandhuber, N. Itzhaki, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Wilson loops, confinement, and phase transitions in large N gauge theories from supergravity,JHEP06(1998) 001 [hep-th/9803263]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  23. [23]

    Brandhuber and K

    A. Brandhuber and K. Sfetsos,Wilson loops from multicenter and rotating branes, mass gaps and phase structure in gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 851 [hep-th/9906201]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  24. [24]

    Nunez, M

    C. Nunez, M. Piai and A. Rago,Wilson Loops in string duals of Walking and Flavored Systems,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 086001 [0909.0748]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 505 [hep-th/9803131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    Wen and H.-X

    C.-K. Wen and H.-X. Yang,QCD(4) glueball masses from AdS(6) black hole description,Mod. Phys. Lett. A20(2005) 997 [hep-th/0404152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    Kuperstein and J

    S. Kuperstein and J. Sonnenschein,Non-critical, near extremal AdS(6) background as a holographic laboratory of four dimensional YM theory,JHEP11(2004) 026 [hep-th/0411009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  28. [28]

    Brower, S.D

    R.C. Brower, S.D. Mathur and C.-I. Tan,Glueball spectrum for QCD from AdS supergravity duality,Nucl. Phys. B587 (2000) 249 [hep-th/0003115]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    Elander, A.F

    D. Elander, A.F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, D. Mateos and M. Piai,Multiscale confining dynamics from holographic RG flows, JHEP05(2014) 003 [1312.7160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Candelas and X.C

    P. Candelas and X.C. de la Ossa,Comments on Conifolds,Nucl. Phys. B342(1990) 246

    1990

  31. [31]

    Chamseddine and M.S

    A.H. Chamseddine and M.S. Volkov,NonAbelian BPS monopoles in N=4 gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.79 (1997) 3343 [hep-th/9707176]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  32. [32]

    Klebanov and M.J

    I.R. Klebanov and M.J. Strassler,Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities,JHEP08(2000) 052 [hep-th/0007191]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  33. [33]

    Maldacena and C

    J.M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,Towards the large N limit of pure N=1 superYang-Mills,Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 588 [hep-th/0008001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  34. [34]

    Butti, M

    A. Butti, M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini and A. Zaffaroni,The Baryonic branch of Klebanov-Strassler solution: A supersymmetric family of SU(3) structure backgrounds,JHEP03(2005) 069 [hep-th/0412187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  35. [35]

    Klebanov and E

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten,Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity,Nucl. Phys. B 536(1998) 199 [hep-th/9807080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    Klebanov and A.A

    I.R. Klebanov and A.A. Tseytlin,Gravity duals of supersymmetric SU(N) x SU(N+M) gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B 578(2000) 123 [hep-th/0002159]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  37. [37]

    Papadopoulos and A.A

    G. Papadopoulos and A.A. Tseytlin,Complex geometry of conifolds and five-brane wrapped on two sphere,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 1333 [hep-th/0012034]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  38. [38]

    Dymarsky, I.R

    A. Dymarsky, I.R. Klebanov and N. Seiberg,On the moduli space of the cascading SU(M+p) x SU(p) gauge theory, JHEP01(2006) 155 [hep-th/0511254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    Andrews and N

    R.P. Andrews and N. Dorey,Deconstruction of the Maldacena-Nunez compactification,Nucl. Phys. B751(2006) 304 [hep-th/0601098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  40. [40]

    Hoyos-Badajoz, C

    C. Hoyos-Badajoz, C. Nunez and I. Papadimitriou,Comments on the String dual to N=1 SQCD,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 086005 [0807.3039]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Nunez, I

    C. Nunez, I. Papadimitriou and M. Piai,Walking Dynamics from String Duals,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 2837 [0812.3655]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    Elander, C

    D. Elander, C. Nunez and M. Piai,A Light scalar from walking solutions in gauge-string duality,Phys. Lett. B686 (2010) 64 [0908.2808]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  43. [43]

    Cassani and A.F

    D. Cassani and A.F. Faedo,A Supersymmetric consistent truncation for conifold solutions,Nucl. Phys. B843(2011) 455 [1008.0883]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    I. Bena, G. Giecold, M. Grana, N. Halmagyi and F. Orsi,Supersymmetric Consistent Truncations of IIB onT 1,1,JHEP 04(2011) 021 [1008.0983]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    Bennett, E

    S. Bennett, E. Caceres, C. Nunez, D. Schofield and S. Young,The Non-SUSY Baryonic Branch: Soft Supersymmetry Breaking of N=1 Gauge Theories,JHEP05(2012) 031 [1111.1727]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Dymarsky and S

    A. Dymarsky and S. Kuperstein,Non-supersymmetric Conifold,JHEP08(2012) 033 [1111.1731]. 37

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Martelli,The Unwarped, resolved, deformed conifold: Fivebranes and the baryonic branch of the Klebanov-Strassler theory,JHEP01(2010) 104 [0906.0591]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  48. [48]

    Gaillard, D

    J. Gaillard, D. Martelli, C. Nunez and I. Papadimitriou,The warped, resolved, deformed conifold gets flavoured,Nucl. Phys. B843(2011) 1 [1004.4638]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    Caceres, C

    E. Caceres, C. Nunez and L.A. Pando-Zayas,Heating up the Baryonic Branch with U-duality: A Unified picture of conifold black holes,JHEP03(2011) 054 [1101.4123]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    Elander, J

    D. Elander, J. Gaillard, C. Nunez and M. Piai,Towards multi-scale dynamics on the baryonic branch of Klebanov-Strassler,JHEP07(2011) 056 [1104.3963]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,On the glueball spectrum of walking backgrounds from wrapped-D5 gravity duals,Nucl. Phys. B 871(2013) 164 [1212.2600]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Glueballs on the Baryonic Branch of Klebanov-Strassler: dimensional deconstruction and a light scalar particle,JHEP06(2017) 003 [1703.10158]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Calculable mass hierarchies and a light dilaton from gravity duals,Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 110 [1703.09205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Bianchi, D.Z

    M. Bianchi, D.Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis,Holographic renormalization,Nucl. Phys. B631(2002) 159 [hep-th/0112119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  55. [55]

    Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class

    K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  56. [56]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis,AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry,IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys.8(2005) 73 [hep-th/0404176]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Dilatonic states near holographic phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 106018 [2010.04100]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Bianchi, M

    M. Bianchi, M. Prisco and W. Mueck,New results on holographic three point functions,JHEP11(2003) 052 [hep-th/0310129]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  59. [59]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and W. Mueck,Bulk dynamics in confining gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B736(2006) 82 [hep-th/0507285]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  60. [60]

    M. Berg, M. Haack and W. Mueck,Glueballs vs. Gluinoballs: Fluctuation Spectra in Non-AdS/Non-CFT,Nucl. Phys. B 789(2008) 1 [hep-th/0612224]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  61. [61]

    Elander,Glueball Spectra of SQCD-like Theories,JHEP03(2010) 114 [0912.1600]

    D. Elander,Glueball Spectra of SQCD-like Theories,JHEP03(2010) 114 [0912.1600]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  62. [62]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Light scalars from a compact fifth dimension,JHEP01(2011) 026 [1010.1964]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Elander,Aspects of gauge-gravity duality., Ph.D

    P.A.D. Elander,Aspects of gauge-gravity duality., Ph.D. thesis, Swansea U., 2010.1010.1988

    arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    Elander,Light scalar from deformations of the Klebanov-Strassler background,Phys

    D. Elander,Light scalar from deformations of the Klebanov-Strassler background,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 126012 [1401.3412]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Holographic glueballs from the circle reduction of Romans supergravity,JHEP02 (2019) 101 [1811.01010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Probing the holographic dilaton,JHEP06(2020) 177 [2004.05656]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Light dilaton in a metastable vacuum,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 046009 [2011.07049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    Elander, M

    D. Elander, M. Piai and J. Roughley,Coulomb branch of N=4 SYM and dilatonic scions in supergravity,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 046003 [2103.06721]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Elander, A

    D. Elander, A. Fatemiabhari and M. Piai,Phase transitions and light scalars in bottom-up holography,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 015021 [2212.07954]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Faedo, C

    A.F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, M. Piai, R. Rodgers and J.G. Subils,Light holographic dilatons near critical points,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 126017 [2406.04974]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Fatemiabhari, C

    A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez, M. Piai and J. Rucinski,Stability of holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 066009 [2411.16854]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Elander, A.F

    D. Elander, A.F. Faedo, M. Piai, R. Rodgers and J.G. Subils,Light dilaton near critical points in top-down holography, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 126020 [2502.19226]

    arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Lucini, A

    B. Lucini, A. Patella, A. Rago and E. Rinaldi,Infrared conformality and bulk critical points: SU(2) with heavy adjoint quarks,JHEP11(2013) 106 [1309.1614]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    Bennett, D.K

    E. Bennett, D.K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C.J.D. Lin, B. Lucini et al.,Lattice studies of the Sp(4) gauge theory with two fundamental and three antisymmetric Dirac fermions,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 014501 [2202.05516]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Cresswell-Hogg, D.F

    C. Cresswell-Hogg, D.F. Litim and R. Zwicky,Dilaton Physics from Asymptotic Freedom,2502.00107

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K

    S. Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1985), 10.1017/CBO9780511565045

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511565045 1985

  77. [77]

    Migdal and M.A

    A.A. Migdal and M.A. Shifman,Dilaton Effective Lagrangian in Gluodynamics,Phys. Lett. B114(1982) 445

    1982

  78. [78]

    Leung, S.T

    C.N. Leung, S.T. Love and W.A. Bardeen,Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Scale Invariant Quantum Electrodynamics,Nucl. Phys. B273(1986) 649

    1986

  79. [79]

    Bardeen, C.N

    W.A. Bardeen, C.N. Leung and S.T. Love,The Dilaton and Chiral Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 1230

    1986

  80. [80]

    Yamawaki, M

    K. Yamawaki, M. Bando and K.-i. Matumoto,Scale Invariant Technicolor Model and a Technidilaton,Phys. Rev. Lett. 56(1986) 1335

    1986

Showing first 80 references.