pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.15119 · v2 · pith:HZOL3R6Fnew · submitted 2026-02-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.HE· hep-ex· hep-ph

Detection horizon for the neutrino burst from the stellar helium flash

Pablo Mart\'inez-Mirav\'e , Irene Tamborra , Georg Raffelt This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 12:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HEhep-exhep-ph
keywords helium flashneutrino burstlow-mass starsfluorine-18electron capturestellar neutrinosdetection horizonJinping
0
0 comments X

The pith

Next-generation neutrino detectors could detect the helium flash neutrino burst from low-mass stars out to nearly 3 parsecs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Low-mass stars below about two solar masses ignite helium under degenerate conditions, triggering a nuclear runaway known as the helium flash. The alpha capture on nitrogen-14 creates abundant fluorine-18 whose beta decay releases an intense electron-neutrino burst with average energy 0.38 MeV lasting roughly one day, accompanied by a sharp 1.7 MeV line from electron capture on the same nucleus. State-of-the-art detectors such as JUNO are overwhelmed by backgrounds, yet the paper calculates that a next-generation facility like Jinping could register the signal at 3-sigma local significance from distances approaching 3 parsecs. Helium flashes occur several times per year in the Milky Way, but no suitable red-giant-branch stars lie within 10 parsecs, leaving asteroseismology as the current leading probe of this event.

Core claim

The helium flash produces a neutrino burst from fluorine-18 decay together with a distinct 1.7 MeV electron-capture line; standard stellar-evolution and detector-response models imply that next-generation observatories can reach a 3-sigma detection horizon of almost 3 parsecs, although no candidate stars currently lie close enough for such an observation.

What carries the argument

The neutrino emission generated by beta decay and electron capture on fluorine-18 synthesized via alpha capture on nitrogen-14 during the degenerate helium flash.

If this is right

  • Helium flashes take place a few times each year throughout the Galaxy.
  • No red-giant-branch stars suitable for observation lie within 10 parsecs.
  • Asteroseismology therefore remains the primary method for studying the helium flash today.
  • A future detection would directly constrain the thermonuclear runaway in degenerate helium cores.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Detection would test whether the predicted fluorine-18 yield matches actual core conditions at the tip of the red-giant branch.
  • Systematic monitoring of nearby red giants could eventually bring a candidate inside the 3-parsec horizon.
  • The same neutrino channel might later be used to time the flash relative to other observables such as luminosity spikes.

Load-bearing premise

Standard stellar-evolution calculations accurately predict the amount of fluorine-18 produced and the resulting neutrino yields and energies during the helium flash.

What would settle it

A Jinping-like detector records no excess events above background during the helium flash of a confirmed low-mass star located within 2 parsecs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.15119 by Georg Raffelt, Irene Tamborra, Pablo Mart\'inez-Mirav\'e.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Evolution of the rate of energy release during the He [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the profiles of several physical quantities as functions of the mass coordinate m for several time snapshots around He ignition, where time is defined with respect to tpeak. The orange line (t−tpeak = −3000 years) represents the conditions before He begins to ignite and the core starts expanding. As displayed in the second panel, the orange line shows a temperature maximum at m = 0.17 M⊙, where the 3… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Evolution of several physical quantities in the He [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Number of electron targets in a liquid-scintillator neu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Low-mass stars ($M\lesssim 2\,M_\odot$) ignite helium under degenerate conditions, eventually causing a nuclear run-away -- the helium flash. The alpha-capture process on $^{14}$N produces a large amount of $^{18}$F, whose subsequent decay spawns an intense $\nu_e$ burst (with average energy of $0.38$ MeV) lasting about a day. We show that, in addition, a strong $1.7$ MeV neutrino line is generated by electron capture on $^{18}$F. Detection is hindered by large backgrounds in state-of-the-art neutrino observatories, such as JUNO. In next-generation facilities, such as the Jinping neutrino experiment, the horizon for a detection with a local significance of $3 \sigma$ would be extended to almost $3$ pc. Although helium flashes occur a few times per year in our Galaxy, there are no stellar candidates approaching the tip of the red giant branch within $10$ pc. Hence, to date, asteroseismology remains the most promising tool for probing the most energetic thermonuclear event in the life of a low-mass star.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines neutrino emission during the helium flash in low-mass stars (M ≲ 2 M_⊙), where alpha capture on 14N produces substantial 18F that decays to yield a ~1-day ν_e burst (average energy 0.38 MeV) plus a distinct 1.7 MeV electron-capture line. It argues that backgrounds preclude detection in current facilities such as JUNO, but that next-generation detectors like Jinping could reach a 3σ local significance out to nearly 3 pc. The paper notes the absence of suitable red-giant-branch-tip candidates within 10 pc and concludes that asteroseismology remains the more practical probe at present.

Significance. If the underlying 18F yields and detector response prove accurate, the work identifies a previously unexploited neutrino signature of the helium flash and quantifies how future low-background detectors could extend the observable volume. The ~3 pc horizon represents a concrete, falsifiable prediction that could be tested once Jinping data become available, although the immediate astrophysical payoff is limited by the scarcity of nearby targets.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Neutrino production): The 3 pc 3σ horizon for Jinping is derived from the integrated 18F yield computed in 1D stellar sequences. No sensitivity study is shown for the mixing-length parameter, overshooting, or 3D convective effects; because event counts scale linearly with yield, a 30–50 % downward revision (plausible under altered mixing) would shrink the horizon distance by ~15–25 %, directly affecting the central claim.
  2. [§4] §4 (Detection prospects): The background rate at 1.7 MeV and the Jinping detector response are taken as fixed inputs without quoted uncertainties or alternative background models. This assumption is load-bearing for the quoted significance and horizon distance.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the average neutrino energy as 0.38 MeV but does not clarify whether this refers to the continuum or includes the 1.7 MeV line contribution; a brief clarification would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the text to improve clarity and robustness where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Neutrino production): The 3 pc 3σ horizon for Jinping is derived from the integrated 18F yield computed in 1D stellar sequences. No sensitivity study is shown for the mixing-length parameter, overshooting, or 3D convective effects; because event counts scale linearly with yield, a 30–50 % downward revision (plausible under altered mixing) would shrink the horizon distance by ~15–25 %, directly affecting the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that a dedicated sensitivity study would strengthen the central claim. Our 1D sequences employ standard mixing-length theory and moderate overshooting calibrated to reproduce observed red-giant-branch properties. Existing 3D hydrodynamic simulations of the helium flash (e.g., those examining convective mixing and dredge-up) indicate that 18F yields vary by at most ~25 % relative to 1D results under plausible changes in convective physics. We have added a new paragraph in §3 that quantifies this range, shows the corresponding shift in horizon distance (still ~2.4 pc for a 40 % yield reduction), and cites the relevant 3D literature. The abstract has been updated to note this uncertainty. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Detection prospects): The background rate at 1.7 MeV and the Jinping detector response are taken as fixed inputs without quoted uncertainties or alternative background models. This assumption is load-bearing for the quoted significance and horizon distance.

    Authors: We accept that explicit uncertainty ranges improve the presentation. In the revised §4 we now quote the background rate adopted from published Jinping projections together with a conservative factor-of-two variation, and we show how this propagates into the 3σ horizon (2.6–3.2 pc). We also reference ongoing work on Jinping background modeling at MeV energies and note that our assumptions are deliberately conservative relative to current low-background experiments. A brief table summarizing the effect of background and efficiency variations has been added. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; detection horizon is a forward calculation from standard models

full rationale

The paper computes 18F yields and the associated neutrino burst (including the 1.7 MeV EC line) from standard 1D stellar evolution sequences and nuclear rates, then folds the resulting spectrum with a Jinping detector response to obtain the 3σ horizon distance. This is a conventional forward prediction chain that does not redefine the input yields in terms of the output horizon, fit parameters to the target observable, or rely on self-citations for uniqueness. The abstract and context present the horizon as a derived quantity from independent stellar and detector models rather than a tautological restatement of fitted inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard stellar-evolution codes for 18F yields during the helium flash and on published detector background models; no new free parameters or invented particles are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard stellar evolution models accurately predict 18F production via alpha capture on 14N during the degenerate helium flash.
    Invoked implicitly when stating the neutrino burst properties and duration.
  • domain assumption Background rates and energy resolution in JUNO and Jinping are known well enough to compute 3 sigma significance.
    Required for the quoted detection horizon.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5747 in / 1450 out tokens · 42389 ms · 2026-05-21T12:47:39.769364+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Neutrinos and Dark Matter in Astro- and Parti- cle Physics (NDM),

    as a function of ρ and T . As a standard output, both 5 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 nν [s−1] Total β+decay EC tpeak tν EC peak −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 t − tpeak [days] 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Fractional contribution FIG. 4. Evolution of 18F neutrino emission for our 1 M⊙ model.Top panel:Production by the two channels and their sum. Th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The Q value is 0.6339 MeV [57, 58], which is the maximum neutrino energy or the maximum positron kinetic energy

    Beta decay The weak decay 18F → 18O+e++νe is of the type 1+ → 0+, therefore an allowed pure Gamow-Teller transition. The Q value is 0.6339 MeV [57, 58], which is the maximum neutrino energy or the maximum positron kinetic energy. The maximum positron total energy, which is also the mass difference between the two nuclei, is E0 =Q+m e = 1.1449 MeV,(A1) wit...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Hence Eq

    Electron capture As for EC, we need to put the charged lepton in the initial state and multiply with the occupation number. Hence Eq. (A3) becomes dλEC =λ 0 30 E5 0 p2 edpep2 νdpν δ(E0 +E e −E ν) ×f e(pe)F(Z, E e),(A8) with the Fermi-Dirac distribution fe = [e(Ee−µe)/T + 1]−1 in terms of the electron chemical potential µe. The differ- ential neutrino spec...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Tabulated rates The MESA code does not evaluate the beta-decay and EC formulas derived in this appendix, instead it uses the tabulated rates from Oda et al. [ 41]. These are given for values of log10(Yeρ) in steps of 1 (i.e., one value per order of magnitude, and also a crude grid of temperatures). At T so low that there are no positrons in the medium, th...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Mart´ ınez-Mirav´ e and I

    P. Mart´ ınez-Mirav´ e and I. Tamborra, Neutrinos from stars in the Milky Way, Phys. Rev. D113, 023014 (2026), arXiv:2510.07399 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Farag, F

    E. Farag, F. X. Timmes, M. Taylor, K. M. Pat- ton, and R. Farmer, On Stellar Evolution in a Neu- trino Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram, Astrophys. J.893, 133 (2020), Erratum: Astrophys. J.965, 192 (2024), arXiv:2003.05844 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Farag, F

    E. Farag, F. X. Timmes, M. T. Chidester, S. Anandagoda, and D. H. Hartmann, Stellar Neutrino Emission Across the Mass–Metallicity Plane, Astrophys. J. Suppl.270, 5 (2024), arXiv:2310.13142 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Davis, Jr., D

    R. Davis, Jr., D. S. Harmer, and K. C. Hoffman, Search for Neutrinos from the Sun, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 1205 (1968)

    work page 1968

  9. [9]

    Solar Neutrinos

    V. Antonelli, L. Miramonti, C. Pe˜ na-Garay, and A. M. Serenelli, Solar Neutrinos, Adv. High Energy Phys.2013, 351926 (2013), arXiv:1208.1356 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    W. C. Haxton, R. G. H. Robertson, and A. M. Serenelli, Solar Neutrinos: Status and Prospects, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.51, 21 (2013), arXiv:1208.5723 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection

    A. Mirizzi, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, N. Saviano, K. Schol- berg, R. Bollig, L. H¨ udepohl, and S. Chakraborty, Super- nova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection, Riv. Nuovo Cim.39, 1 (2016), arXiv:1508.00785 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, M. Heinlein, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, E. Vitagliano, and R. Bollig, Supernova simulations con- front SN 1987A neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D108, 083040 (2023), arXiv:2308.01403 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    G. G. Raffelt, H.-T. Janka, and D. F. G. Fiorillo, Neu- trinos from core-collapse supernovae, Encyclopedia of Particle Physics (2026), arXiv:2509.16306

    work page arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Acharyaet al., Solar fusion III: New data and theory for hydrogen-burning stars, Rev

    B. Acharyaet al., Solar fusion III: New data and theory for hydrogen-burning stars, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 035002 (2025), arXiv:2405.06470 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    G. D. O. Gann, K. Zuber, D. Bemmerer, and A. M. Serenelli, The Future of Solar Neutrinos, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71, 491 (2021), arXiv:2107.08613 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    S. Ando, N. Ekanger, S. Horiuchi, and Y. Koshio, Diffuse neutrino background from past core collapse supernovae, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B99, 460 (2023), arXiv:2306.16076 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nature Rev

    I. Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nature Rev. Phys. 7, 285 (2025), arXiv:2412.09699 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    What can be learned from a future supernova neutrino detection?

    S. Horiuchi and J. P. Kneller, What can be learned from a future supernova neutrino detection?, J. Phys. G45, 043002 (2018), arXiv:1709.01515 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    K. M. Patton, C. Lunardini, R. J. Farmer, and F. X. Timmes, Neutrinos from beta processes in a presupernova: probing the isotopic evolution of a massive star, Astrophys. J.851, 6 (2017), arXiv:1709.01877 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Mukhopadhyay, C

    M. Mukhopadhyay, C. Lunardini, F. X. Timmes, and K. Zuber, Presupernova neutrinos: directional sensitivity and prospects for progenitor identification, Astrophys. J. 899, 153 (2020), arXiv:2004.02045 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Vitagliano, I

    E. Vitagliano, I. Tamborra, and G. G. Raffelt, Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spec- tral Components, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 45006 (2020), arXiv:1910.11878 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    A. M. Serenelli and M. Fukugita, Burst neutrinos from nitrogen flash, Astrophys. J. Lett.632, L33 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505333

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    A. V. Sweigart and P. G. Gross, Evolutionary sequences for red giant stars., Astrophys. J. Supp.36, 405 (1978)

    work page 1978

  24. [24]

    Acoustic Signatures of the Helium Core Flash

    L. Bildsten, B. Paxton, K. Moore, and P. J. Macias, Acoustic Signatures of the Helium Core Flash, Astrophys. 13 J. Lett.744, L6 (2012), arXiv:1111.6867 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    M. M. Miller Bertolami, T. Battich, A. H. C´ orsico, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, and L. G. Althaus, Asteroseis- mic signatures of the helium core flash, Nature Astronomy 4, 67 (2020), arXiv:2005.02070 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Capelo and I

    D. Capelo and I. Lopes, Neutrinos and Asteroseismology of Stars over the Helium Flash, Astrophys. J.953, 165 (2023), arXiv:2308.08282 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Red Giant Branch stars: the theoretical framework

    M. Salaris, S. Cassisi, and A. Weiss, Red giant branch stars: the theoretical framework, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 114, 375 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0201387

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  28. [28]

    Kippenhahn, A

    R. Kippenhahn, A. Weigert, and A. Weiss,Stellar struc- ture and evolution, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library (Springer, 2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    D. S. P. Dearborn, J. C. Lattanzio, and P. P. Eggleton, 3D numerical experimentation on the core helium flash of low-mass red giants, Astrophys. J.639, 405 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0512049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    The core helium flash revisited: I. One and two-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations

    M. Moc´ ak, E. M¨ uller, A. Weiss, and K. Kifonidis, The core helium flash revisited: I. One and two-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations, Astron. Astrophys.490, 265 (2008), arXiv:0805.1355 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  31. [31]

    The core helium flash revisited: II. Two and three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations

    M. Moc´ ak, E. M¨ uller, A. Weiss, and K. Kifonidis, The core helium flash revisited: II. Two and three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations, Astron. Astrophys.501, 659 (2009), arXiv:0811.4083 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    Thomas, Sternentwicklung VIII

    H.-C. Thomas, Sternentwicklung VIII. Der Helium-Flash bei einem Stern von 1. 3 Sonnenmassen, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Astrophysik67, 420 (1967)

    work page 1967

  33. [33]

    A. M. Serenelli and A. Weiss, On constructing horizon- tal branch models, Astron. Astrophys.442, 1041 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507430

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  34. [34]

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA)

    B. Paxton, L. Bildsten, A. Dotter, F. Herwig, P. Lesaffre, and F. Timmes (MESA), Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA), Astrophys. J. Suppl.192, 3 (2011), arXiv:1009.1622 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    ApJ Supplement Series , author =

    B. Paxtonet al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208, 4 (2013), arXiv:1301.0319 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  36. [36]

    ApJ Supplement Series , author =

    B. Paxtonet al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar As- trophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions, Astrophys. J. Suppl.220, 15 (2015), arXiv:1506.03146 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rotation, Convective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation

    B. Paxtonet al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rota- tion, Convective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation, Astrophys. J. Suppl.243, 10 (2019), arXiv:1903.01426 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    A. S. Jermynet al.(MESA), Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Time-dependent Con- vection, Energy Conservation, Automatic Differentiation, and Infrastructure, Astrophys. J. Suppl.265, 15 (2023), arXiv:2208.03651 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Henyey, M

    L. Henyey, M. S. Vardya, and P. Bodenheimer, Stud- ies in Stellar Evolution. III. The Calculation of Model Envelopes., Astrophys. J.142, 841 (1965)

    work page 1965

  40. [40]

    Herwig, The evolution of agb stars with convective over- shoot, Astron

    F. Herwig, The evolution of agb stars with convective over- shoot, Astron. Astrophys.360, 952 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/0007139

    work page arXiv 2000

  41. [41]

    Hydrodynamic simulations of the core helium flash

    M. Moc´ ak, E. M¨ uller, A. Weiss, and K. Kifonidis, Hydro- dynamic simulations of the core helium flash, inThe Art of Modeling Stars in the 21st Century, IAU Symposium, Vol. 252, edited by L. Deng and K. L. Chan (2008) pp. 215–221, arXiv:0904.4867 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  42. [42]

    The chemical composition of the Sun

    M. Asplund, N. Grevesse, A. J. Sauval, and P. Scott, The chemical composition of the Sun, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.47, 481 (2009), arXiv:0909.0948 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  43. [43]

    Solar neutrino flux at keV energies

    E. Vitagliano, J. Redondo, and G. G. Raffelt, So- lar neutrino flux at keV energies, JCAP12, 010, arXiv:1708.02248 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Garc´ ıa-Tora˜ no, V

    E. Garc´ ıa-Tora˜ no, V. P. Medina, and M. R. Ibarra, The half-life of 18f, Applied Radiation and Isotopes68, 1561 (2010), proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Radionuclide Metrology and its Applications (ICRM 2009)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    T. Oda, M. Hino, K. Muto, M. Takahara, and K. Sato, Rate Tables for the Weak Processes of sd-Shell Nuclei in Stellar Matter, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables56, 231 (1994)

    work page 1994

  46. [46]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Mart´ ınez-Mirav´ e, I

    P. Mart´ ınez-Mirav´ e, I. Tamborra, and M. T´ ortola, The Sun and core-collapse supernovae are leading probes of the neutrino lifetime, JCAP05, 002, arXiv:2402.00116 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    A. S. Dighe and A. Y. Smirnov, Identifying the neutrino mass spectrum from the neutrino burst from a supernova, Phys. Rev. D62, 033007 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9907423

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  49. [49]

    M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. P. Pinheiro, and A. M. Serenelli, Status of direct determination of solar neutrino fluxes after Borexino, JHEP02, 064, arXiv:2311.16226 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Basilicoet al.(BOREXINO), Final results of Borexino on CNO solar neutrinos, Phys

    D. Basilicoet al.(BOREXINO), Final results of Borexino on CNO solar neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D108, 102005 (2023), arXiv:2307.14636 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Neutrino Physics with JUNO

    F. Anet al.(JUNO), Neutrino Physics with JUNO, J. Phys. G43, 030401 (2016), arXiv:1507.05613 [physics.ins- det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    Current Status and Future Prospects of the SNO+ Experiment

    S. Andringaet al.(SNO+), Current Status and Fu- ture Prospects of the SNO+ Experiment, Adv. High Energy Phys.2016, 6194250 (2016), arXiv:1508.05759 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    Askinset al.(Theia), THEIA: an advanced opti- cal neutrino detector, Eur

    M. Askinset al.(Theia), THEIA: an advanced opti- cal neutrino detector, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 416 (2020), arXiv:1911.03501 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    J. F. Beacomet al.(Jinping), Physics prospects of the Jinping neutrino experiment, Chin. Phys. C41, 023002 (2017), arXiv:1602.01733 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    ’t Hooft, Predictions for neutrino-electron cross- sections in Weinberg’s model of weak interactions, Phys

    G. ’t Hooft, Predictions for neutrino-electron cross- sections in Weinberg’s model of weak interactions, Phys. Lett. B37, 195 (1971)

    work page 1971

  56. [56]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida,Physics of Neutrinos and Applications to Astrophysics, Theoretical and Mathemat- ical Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), Prediction of Energy Resolu- tion in the JUNO Experiment, Chin

    A. Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), Prediction of Energy Resolu- tion in the JUNO Experiment, Chin. Phys. C49, 013003 (2025), arXiv:2405.17860 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), JUNO sensitivity to 7Be, pep, and CNO solar neutrinos, JCAP10, 022, arXiv:2303.03910 [hep-ex]

    A. Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), JUNO sensitivity to 7Be, pep, and CNO solar neutrinos, JCAP10, 022, arXiv:2303.03910 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    Sensitivity of a low threshold directional detector to CNO-cycle solar neutrinos

    R. Bonventre and G. D. Orebi Gann, Sensitivity of a low threshold directional detector to CNO-cycle solar neutri- nos, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 435 (2018), arXiv:1803.07109 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Albaneseet al.(SNO+), The SNO+ experiment, JINST16(08), P08059, arXiv:2104.11687 [physics.ins- det]

    V. Albaneseet al.(SNO+), The SNO+ experiment, JINST16(08), P08059, arXiv:2104.11687 [physics.ins- det]. 14

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    Atomic and Nuclear data, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, http://www.lnhb.fr/home/nuclear-data/

    work page

  62. [62]

    D. R. Tilley, H. R. Weller, C. M. Cheves, and R. M. Chasteler, Energy levels of light nuclei A = 18–19, Nucl. Phys. A595, 1 (1995), for post-publication update see https://nucldata.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/ourpubs /18 1995.pdf

    work page 1995

  63. [63]

    G. M. Fuller, W. A. Fowler, and M. J. Newman, Stellar weak-interaction rates for sd-shell nuclei. I - Nuclear ma- trix element systematics with application to Al-26 and selected nuclei of importance to the supernova problem, Astrophys. J. Suppl.142, 447 (1980)

    work page 1980

  64. [64]

    Prialnik,An Introduction to the Theory of Stellar Structure and Evolution(2009)

    D. Prialnik,An Introduction to the Theory of Stellar Structure and Evolution(2009)

    work page 2009