pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.23044 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-26 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ph· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Form factors of the rho meson from effective field theory and the lattice

Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner , Akaki Rusetsky , Ajay S. Sakthivasan , Gerrit Schierholz , Jia-Jun Wu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 19:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-phnucl-th
keywords rho mesonelectromagnetic form factorseffective field theorychiral perturbation theoryFeynman-Hellmann theorembackground fieldlattice QCDresonance properties
0
0 comments X

The pith

A background electromagnetic field plus the Feynman-Hellmann theorem yields first estimates of the three form factors of the rho meson in effective field theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method that introduces an external electromagnetic field and applies the Feynman-Hellmann theorem to extract form factors of resonances, which are otherwise difficult to compute directly. After validating the approach on a toy model, the authors apply it to the rho meson and match the resulting energy shifts to chiral perturbation theory. This matching supplies a crude numerical estimate for all three electromagnetic form factors and reveals that local contact operators contribute substantially. The work also sketches the steps needed to carry the same procedure over to lattice QCD simulations. A reader cares because resonance electromagnetic properties enter many low-energy observables yet lack reliable first-principles values.

Core claim

The authors apply the background-field plus Feynman-Hellmann procedure to the electromagnetic form factors of the rho meson in effective field theory. After matching the computed energy shifts to chiral perturbation theory they obtain a first crude estimate of all three form factors and find that contact contributions are substantial. The same procedure is outlined for future lattice calculations, thereby opening an ab-initio route to resonance form factors.

What carries the argument

The background-field method combined with the Feynman-Hellmann theorem, which extracts form-factor information from the shift in energy levels induced by a weak external electromagnetic field.

If this is right

  • All three electromagnetic form factors of the rho meson receive sizable local contact contributions that must be retained in any chiral effective theory description.
  • The method supplies a concrete route for lattice QCD to compute resonance form factors that are inaccessible by standard current-insertion techniques.
  • Once implemented on the lattice the same framework can be used to obtain ab-initio values for the rho-meson electromagnetic radii and moments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique may be adapted to other narrow resonances such as the Delta baryon or the omega meson with only modest changes to the external-field setup.
  • Reliable form-factor values obtained this way would provide improved inputs for calculations of hadronic light-by-light scattering and muon g-2.
  • Higher-order terms in the chiral expansion can be included systematically once the leading contact terms are fixed by the lattice data.

Load-bearing premise

The background-field plus Feynman-Hellmann procedure that worked on a toy model extends without major modification to the interacting rho-meson system, and the subsequent matching to chiral perturbation theory faithfully recovers the physical form factors.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation performed with the outlined background-field procedure that, after chiral matching, produces form-factor values differing by more than the expected systematic errors from the crude effective-theory estimates would show the method does not extract the physical quantities.

read the original abstract

The calculation of resonance form factors in effective field theory as well as on the lattice is a highly challenging task. In a recent paper, we proposed a novel method based on the introduction of a background field and the Feynman-Hellmann theorem to address the problem, and applied it to a toy model. In the present work we use this method for the electromagnetic form factors of the $\rho$-meson. By matching the results to Chiral Perturbation Theory, we provide a first, crude estimate of all three form factors of the $\rho$-meson within the effective field theory. Contact contributions to these form factors turn out to be substantial. A procedure for lattice calculations is outlined, paving the way for an ab initio approach to the problem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends a background-field plus Feynman-Hellmann theorem approach, previously validated only on a toy model, to the electromagnetic form factors of the ρ-meson in effective field theory. Matching the resulting expressions to chiral perturbation theory yields a first crude estimate of all three form factors, with the conclusion that contact contributions are substantial; a procedure for future lattice calculations is outlined.

Significance. If the extension of the method to the unstable ρ system proves robust and the ChPT matching isolates the physical form factors without significant scheme or higher-order contamination, the work would supply a useful EFT framework for resonance form factors, underscore the role of contact terms, and provide concrete guidance for ab initio lattice studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [ρ-meson implementation] The central claim that the background-field plus Feynman-Hellmann procedure extends to the ρ-meson without major modification rests on the unshown details of its application to the interacting, unstable system. No explicit checks are presented that the background field avoids state mixing or introduces artifacts peculiar to the ρ resonance (see the section describing the ρ-meson implementation).
  2. [Matching to ChPT] The crude estimates of the three form factors and the assertion that contact contributions are substantial depend entirely on the matching to ChPT. No explicit functional forms, numerical values, error budgets, or discussion of residual scheme dependence or higher-order contamination are provided, leaving the load-bearing step of the analysis unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that contact contributions 'turn out to be substantial' but supplies no quantitative measure or comparison to the non-contact pieces.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We agree that additional explicit details are required to fully substantiate the extension of the method to the ρ meson and the ChPT matching procedure. We will revise the manuscript to address both major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the background-field plus Feynman-Hellmann procedure extends to the ρ-meson without major modification rests on the unshown details of its application to the interacting, unstable system. No explicit checks are presented that the background field avoids state mixing or introduces artifacts peculiar to the ρ resonance (see the section describing the ρ-meson implementation).

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not provide sufficient explicit derivations or numerical checks for the application to the unstable ρ system. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection with the full implementation details, including the form of the background-field coupling to the ρ, the resulting energy shifts, and explicit verification that state mixing remains under control within the EFT power counting. This will directly address the concern about artifacts specific to the resonance. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The crude estimates of the three form factors and the assertion that contact contributions are substantial depend entirely on the matching to ChPT. No explicit functional forms, numerical values, error budgets, or discussion of residual scheme dependence or higher-order contamination are provided, leaving the load-bearing step of the analysis unverified.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the matching step was presented only at a schematic level. We will expand the relevant section to include the explicit ChPT expressions used for matching, the numerical values extracted for the three form factors together with their uncertainties, a breakdown of the error budget, and a discussion of residual scheme dependence and truncation effects at the order considered. These additions will allow independent verification of the estimates and of the conclusion that contact terms are substantial. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Method extension from toy model relies on self-citation without rho-specific validation

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "In a recent paper, we proposed a novel method based on the introduction of a background field and the Feynman-Hellmann theorem to address the problem, and applied it to a toy model. In the present work we use this method for the electromagnetic form factors of the ρ-meson."

    The load-bearing technique (background field + Feynman-Hellmann) is justified solely by citation to the same authors' earlier toy-model paper; no independent derivation or rho-specific validation appears in the present text, so the extension inherits its justification from that self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central procedure is introduced by explicit reference to the authors' own prior work on a toy model, then applied directly to the rho-meson without additional cross-checks in this manuscript. Matching to external ChPT supplies independent content for the final estimates, keeping overall circularity modest rather than forcing the result by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of chiral effective field theory and on the validity of the Feynman-Hellmann relation in the presence of a background field; the only free parameters are those already present in chiral perturbation theory that are used for the matching.

free parameters (1)
  • ChPT low-energy constants
    Matching the effective-field-theory results to chiral perturbation theory requires values or fits of the low-energy constants that enter the chiral Lagrangian for the rho sector.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry governs the low-energy dynamics of light quarks and gluons
    Invoked when the results are matched to chiral perturbation theory.
  • domain assumption Feynman-Hellmann theorem relates energy shifts to matrix elements in the presence of a background field
    Central to extracting the form factors from the background-field calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5450 in / 1477 out tokens · 30789 ms · 2026-05-15T19:19:19.979474+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The calculation of resonance form factors in effective field theory as well as on the lattice is a highly challenging task. In a recent paper, we proposed a novel method based on the introduction of a background field and the Feynman-Hellmann theorem... By matching the results to Chiral Perturbation Theory, we provide a first, crude estimate of all three form factors of the ρ-meson within the effective field theory. Contact contributions to these form factors turn out to be substantial.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The modified Lüscher equation, which determines the finite-volume energy levels in the presence of the background field, is derived in Sect. 4... the couplings g1,g2,g3 that appear in the diagram (b). These are extracted on the lattice from the finite-volume energy levels in the background field

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Meißner, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, Akaki Rusetsky, and Gerrit Schierholz

    Jonathan Lozano, Ulf-G. Meißner, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, Akaki Rusetsky, and Gerrit Schierholz. Resonance form factors from finite-volume correlation functions with the external field method.JHEP, 10:106, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Gurtler et al

    M. Gurtler et al. Vector meson electromagnetic form factors.PoS, LATTICE2008:051, 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Alexandrou, T

    C. Alexandrou, T. Korzec, G. Koutsou, Th. Leontiou, C. Lorce, J. W. Negele, V. Pascalutsa, A. Tsapalis, and M. Vanderhaeghen. ∆-baryon electromagnetic form factors in lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 79:014507, 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Stokes, Waseem Kamleh, and Derek B

    Finn M. Stokes, Waseem Kamleh, and Derek B. Leinweber. Elastic Form Factors of Nucleon Excitations in Lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 102(1):014507, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Jonathan M. M. Hall, Waseem Kamleh, Derek B. Leinweber, Benjamin J. Menadue, Benjamin J. Owen, and Anthony W. Thomas. Light-quark contributions to the magnetic form factor of the Λ (1405).Phys. Rev. D, 95(5):054510, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Meißner, and Carsten Urbach

    Maxim Mai, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Carsten Urbach. Towards a theory of hadron resonances. Phys. Rept., 1001:1–66, 2023. – 37 –

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix

    Martin L¨ uscher. Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix. Nucl. Phys. B, 354:531–578, 1991

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    Pion magnetic polarisability using the background field method.Phys

    Ryan Bignell, Waseem Kamleh, and Derek Leinweber. Pion magnetic polarisability using the background field method.Phys. Lett. B, 811:135853, 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Magnetic properties of the nucleon in a uniform background field.Phys

    Thomas Primer, Waseem Kamleh, Derek Leinweber, and Matthias Burkardt. Magnetic properties of the nucleon in a uniform background field.Phys. Rev. D, 89(3):034508, 2014

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Lee, Scott Moerschbacher, and Walter Wilcox

    Frank X. Lee, Scott Moerschbacher, and Walter Wilcox. Magnetic moments of vector, axial, and tensor mesons in lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 78:094502, 2008

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Savage, Brian C

    Emmanuel Chang, William Detmold, Kostas Orginos, Assumpta Parreno, Martin J. Savage, Brian C. Tiburzi, and Silas R. Beane. Magnetic structure of light nuclei from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 92(11):114502, 2015

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    A. J. Chambers et al. Electromagnetic form factors at large momenta from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 96(11):114509, 2017

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Batelaan, K

    M. Batelaan, K. U. Can, R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, H. St¨ uben, R. D. Young, and J. M. Zanotti. Feynman-Hellmann approach to transition matrix elements and quasidegenerate energy states.Phys. Rev. D, 108(3):034507, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Utku Can, Joshua A

    K. Utku Can, Joshua A. Crawford, Roger Horsley, Paul E. L. Rakow, Thomas G. Schar, Gerrit Schierholz, Hinnerk St¨ uben, Ross D. Young, and James M. Zanotti. Gross-Llewellyn Smith sum rule from lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 111(11):114505, 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    K. U. Can, A. Hannaford-Gunn, R. Horsley, P. E. L. Rakow, T. Schar, G. Schierholz, H. St¨ uben, R. D. Young, and J. M. Zanotti. Lattice QCD calculation of the Compton amplitude subtraction function.Phys. Rev. D, 111(9):094513, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Alec Hannaford-Gunn, Kadir Utku Can, Roger Horsley, Yoshifumi Nakamura, Holger Perlt, Paul E. L. Rakow, Hinnerk St¨ uben, Gerrit Schierholz, Ross D. Young, and James M. Zanotti. Generalized parton distributions from the off-forward Compton amplitude in lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 105(1):014502, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Weak transition matrix elements from finite volume correlation functions.Commun

    Laurent Lellouch and Martin Luscher. Weak transition matrix elements from finite volume correlation functions.Commun. Math. Phys., 219:31–44, 2001

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Agadjanov, V

    A. Agadjanov, V. Bernard, U.-G. Meißner, and A. Rusetsky. A framework for the calculation of the ∆Nγ∗ transition form factors on the lattice.Nucl. Phys. B, 886:1199–1222, 2014

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Meißner, and Akaki Rusetsky

    Andria Agadjanov, V´ eronique Bernard, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Akaki Rusetsky. TheB→K∗ form factors on the lattice.Nucl. Phys. B, 910:387–409, 2016

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Brice˜ no, Jozef J

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Jozef J. Dudek, Robert G. Edwards, Christian J. Shultz, Christopher E. Thomas, and David J. Wilson. Theππ→πγ⋆ amplitude and the resonantρ→πγ⋆ transition from lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 93(11):114508, 2016. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 079902 (2022)]

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Brice˜ no and Maxwell T

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no and Maxwell T. Hansen. Multichannel 0→2 and 1→2 transition amplitudes for arbitrary spin particles in a finite volume.Phys. Rev. D, 92(7):074509, 2015

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Brice˜ no, Maxwell T

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Maxwell T. Hansen, and Andr´ e Walker-Loud. Multichannel 1→2 transition amplitudes in a finite volume.Phys. Rev. D, 91(3):034501, 2015

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    D. Hoja, U. G. Meißner, and A. Rusetsky. Resonances in an external field: The 1+1 dimensional case.JHEP, 04:050, 2010. – 38 –

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    Bernard, D

    V. Bernard, D. Hoja, U.-G. Meißner, and A. Rusetsky. Matrix elements of unstable states. JHEP, 09:023, 2012

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Brice˜ no, Maxwell T

    Alessandro Baroni, Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Maxwell T. Hansen, and Felipe G. Ortega-Gama. Form factors of two-hadron states from a covariant finite-volume formalism.Phys. Rev. D, 100(3):034511, 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Brice˜ no, Maxwell T

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Maxwell T. Hansen, and Andrew W. Jackura. Consistency checks for two-body finite-volume matrix elements: I. Conserved currents and bound states.Phys. Rev. D, 100(11):114505, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Brice˜ no, Maxwell T

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Maxwell T. Hansen, and Andrew W. Jackura. Consistency checks for two-body finite-volume matrix elements: II. Perturbative systems.Phys. Rev. D, 101(9):094508, 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Brice˜ no, Andrew W

    Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Andrew W. Jackura, Felipe G. Ortega-Gama, and Keegan H. Sherman. On-shell representations of two-body transition amplitudes: Single external current.Phys. Rev. D, 103(11):114512, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Ortega-Gama, Ra´ ul A

    Joseph Moscoso, Felipe G. Ortega-Gama, Ra´ ul A. Brice˜ no, Andrew W. Jackura, Charles Kacir, and Amy N. Nicholson. Resolving the structure of bound states using lattice quantum field theories. 2 2026

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Mandelstam

    S. Mandelstam. Dynamical variables in the Bethe-Salpeter formalism.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 233:248, 1955

    work page 1955

  31. [31]

    Albaladejo and J

    M. Albaladejo and J. A. Oller. On the size of the sigma meson and its nature.Phys. Rev. D, 86:034003, 2012

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Djukanovic, E

    D. Djukanovic, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, and U. G. Meißner. The magnetic moment of the ρ-meson.Phys. Lett. B, 730:115–121, 2014

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    J. N. Hedditch, W. Kamleh, B. G. Lasscock, D. B. Leinweber, A. G. Williams, and J. M. Zanotti. Pseudoscalar and vector meson form-factors from lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 75:094504, 2007

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Three-particle Lellouch-L¨ uscher formalism in moving frames.JHEP, 02:214, 2023

    Fabian M¨ uller, Jin-Yi Pang, Akaki Rusetsky, and Jia-Jun Wu. Three-particle Lellouch-L¨ uscher formalism in moving frames.JHEP, 02:214, 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Relativistic-invariant formulation of the NREFT three-particle quantization condition.JHEP, 02:158, 2022

    Fabian M¨ uller, Jin-Yi Pang, Akaki Rusetsky, and Jia-Jun Wu. Relativistic-invariant formulation of the NREFT three-particle quantization condition.JHEP, 02:158, 2022

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Composite Vector Particles in External Electromagnetic Fields.Phys

    Zohreh Davoudi and William Detmold. Composite Vector Particles in External Electromagnetic Fields.Phys. Rev. D, 93(1):014509, 2016

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Kaplan, Martin J

    David B. Kaplan, Martin J. Savage, and Mark B. Wise. Two nucleon systems from effective field theory.Nucl. Phys. B, 534:329–355, 1998

    work page 1998

  38. [38]

    Gockeler, R

    M. Gockeler, R. Horsley, M. Lage, U.-G. Meißner, P. E. L. Rakow, A. Rusetsky, G. Schierholz, and J. M. Zanotti. Scattering phases for meson and baryon resonances on general moving-frame lattices.Phys. Rev. D, 86:094513, 2012

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Gockeler, R

    M. Gockeler, R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, and J. Zanotti. Extracting the rho resonance from lattice QCD simulations at small quark masses.PoS, LATTICE2008:136, 2008

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    Ruiz de Elvira, U

    J. Ruiz de Elvira, U. G. Meißner, A. Rusetsky, and G. Schierholz. Feynman–Hellmann theorem for resonances and the quest for QCD exotica.Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(10):659, 2017. – 39 –

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    L. A. Heuser, G. Chanturia, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, M. Hoferichter, and B. Kubis. From pole parameters to line shapes and branching ratios.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(6):599, 2024

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    J. A. Oller, E. Oset, and J. R. Pelaez. Meson meson interaction in a nonperturbative chiral approach.Phys. Rev. D, 59:074001, 1999. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 60, 099906 (1999), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 099903 (2007)]

    work page 1999

  43. [43]

    A. Schenk. Absorption and dispersion of pions at finite temperature.Nucl. Phys. B, 363:97–113, 1991

    work page 1991

  44. [44]

    Garc´ ıa Gudi˜ no and G

    D. Garc´ ıa Gudi˜ no and G. Toledo S´ anchez. Determination of the magnetic dipole moment of theρmeson using 4-pion electroproduction data.Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser., 35:1460463, 2014

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Garc´ ıa Gudi˜ no and G

    D. Garc´ ıa Gudi˜ no and G. Toledo S´ anchez. Determination of the magnetic dipole moment of theρmeson using four-pion electroproduction data.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 30(18n19):1550114, 2015

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Antonio Rojas and Genaro Toledo.ρ-meson magnetic dipole moment from BaBar e+e−→π+π−π0π0 cross section measurement.Phys. Rev. D, 110(5):056037, 2024

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    T. M. Aliev and M. Savci. Electromagnetic form factors of the rho meson in light cone QCD sum rules.Phys. Rev. D, 70:094007, 2004

    work page 2004

  48. [48]

    V. V. Braguta and A. I. Onishchenko.ρmeson form-factors and QCD sum rules.Phys. Rev. D, 70:033001, 2004

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    Electromagnetic structure of theρmeson in the light front quark model.Phys

    Ho-Meoyng Choi and Chueng-Ryong Ji. Electromagnetic structure of theρmeson in the light front quark model.Phys. Rev. D, 70:053015, 2004

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    M. S. Bhagwat and P. Maris. Vector meson form factors and their quark-mass dependence. Phys. Rev. C, 77:025203, 2008

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Carrillo-Serrano, Wolfgang Bentz, Ian C

    Manuel E. Carrillo-Serrano, Wolfgang Bentz, Ian C. Clo¨ et, and Anthony W. Thomas.ρ meson form factors in a confining Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model.Phys. Rev. C, 92(1):015212, 2015

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    T.D. Lee. Minimal Electromagnetic Interaction andC,TNoninvariance.Phys. Rev., 140:B967, 1965

    work page 1965

  53. [53]

    Kakha Shamanauriet al.(in progress)

    work page

  54. [54]

    Virtual photons in low-energy pi pi scattering.Nucl

    Marc Knecht and Res Urech. Virtual photons in low-energy pi pi scattering.Nucl. Phys. B, 519:329–360, 1998

    work page 1998

  55. [55]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler. Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop.Annals Phys., 158:142, 1984

    work page 1984

  56. [56]

    Bijnens, G

    J. Bijnens, G. Colangelo, G. Ecker, J. Gasser, and M. E. Sainio. Pion-pion scattering at low energy.Nucl. Phys. B, 508:263–310, 1997. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 517, 639–639 (1998)]

    work page 1997

  57. [57]

    S. D. Protopopescu, M. Alston-Garnjost, A. Barbaro-Galtieri, Stanley M. Flatte, J. H. Friedman, T. A. Lasinski, G. R. Lynch, M. S. Rabin, and F. T. Solmitz.ππPartial Wave Analysis from Reactionsπ+p→π+π− ∆ ++ andπ+p→K+K − ∆ ++ at 7.1 GeV/c.Phys. Rev. D, 7:1279, 1973

    work page 1973

  58. [58]

    Estabrooks and Alan D

    P. Estabrooks and Alan D. Martin.ππPhase Shift Analysis Below the ¯KThreshold.Nucl. Phys. B, 79:301–316, 1974. – 40 –

    work page 1974