arxiv: 2602.24175 · v5 · submitted 2026-02-27 · ⚛️ nucl-th · nucl-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Theoretical Studies of alpha Clustering in Nuclei and Beyond

Takaharu Otsuka , Alexander Volya , Naoyuki Itagaki

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 18:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th nucl-ex

keywords alpha clusteringnuclear rotationno-core shell modelHoyle state12C8Becluster degrees of freedom

0 comments

The pith

Alpha clustering in light nuclei produces dual rotational modes of compact and distant objects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews Monte Carlo shell model calculations showing alpha clustering in the ground states of 8Be, 10Be, 12Be and 12C, with the Hoyle state of 12C dominated by triangular alpha configurations. It extends a fully quantum formulation of deformation and rotation to these cluster states and identifies two distinct modes: compact-object rotation typical of heavy nuclei and distant-object rotation characteristic of well-separated clusters. The work also outlines an extended no-core shell model that adds explicit cluster-nucleon configurations and demonstrates that spin-orbit forces allow mixing between cluster and jj-coupling shell components in 12C. These findings matter because they unify rotational spectra across clustered light nuclei, suggest parallels to molecular and hadronic systems, and point toward a microscopic description of fission pathways.

Core claim

By extending the fully quantum formulation for deformation and rotation to alpha-cluster states, the paper establishes dual rotational modes: compact-object rotations observed in many heavy nuclei and distant-object rotations appearing in clustering configurations. 8Be exemplifies the distant-object mode while 12C is a rare case displaying both modes simultaneously. The same perspective applies to atomic molecules and hadrons, with possible relevance to fission.

What carries the argument

Dual rotational modes of compact-object and distant-object rotations, obtained by applying the fully quantum formulation of deformation and rotation directly to alpha-cluster states.

If this is right

Rotational bands in the Hoyle state of 12C should reflect triangular alpha clustering with characteristic energy spacings.
The ground state of 12C mixes cluster and shell-model components, with spin-orbit strength controlling the balance.
Similar dual modes are expected in other light nuclei exhibiting robust alpha substructure.
The framework supplies a microscopic route to modeling fission as a transition between compact and distant rotational regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The distinction between modes may offer a practical classifier for nuclear states according to the degree of cluster separation.
Calculations in heavier systems could test whether distant-object rotation appears only when clustering persists to high excitation energy.
Links to molecular and hadronic rotation suggest cross-domain experiments that compare moment-of-inertia scaling across these regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The fully quantum formulation for deformation and rotation developed for other systems extends to cluster states without extra terms to handle spatial separation or antisymmetrization.

What would settle it

Measured rotational energy levels in 12C or 8Be that lack the predicted sequence or moment-of-inertia ratios for either compact-object or distant-object bands.

read the original abstract

This article comprises three sections. Section 2 starts with a review of ab initio no-core shell model calculations by Monte Carlo Shell Model. Alpha clustering arises for 8,10,12Be and 12C with Daejeon16 and JISP16 interactions, even in the ground state of 12C. Hoyle state is shown to be dominated by alpha clustering in triangular configurations. As the ground and Hoyle states show strong deformations, they are good cases to investigate rotational excitations. As an original work, the recently proposed fully quantum (mechanical) formulation for deformation and rotation is extended to cluster states. Dual rotational modes are proposed: compact-object and distant-object rotations. The former is found in many heavy nuclei, whereas the latter can be found for clustering states. While 8Be is an example for the latter, 12C is a rare example that both modes appear. Atomic molecules and hadrons can be viewed similarly. Possible relevance to fission is mentioned. Section 3 presents a general framework for an extended no-core shell model with cluster-nucleon configuration interaction, combining traditional shell-model-like configurations with explicit microscopic configurations representing cluster degrees of freedom. The section reviews the microscopic origins of cluster substructures in light nuclei, emphasizing how nucleonic degrees of freedom, nucleon-nucleon interactions, and continuum coupling naturally extend the traditional shell model into configuration-interaction frameworks that incorporate clustering and reaction dynamics. Section 4 presents that although the cluster structure is robust in Be-C nuclei, some jj-coupling shell model components are mixed in the ground state of 12C. Using the antisymmetrized quasi cluster model, we can clearly model this competition between the cluster and shell components. The spin-orbit interaction is key.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper extends a quantum rotation formulation to alpha clusters to propose dual modes, with a useful sketch of cluster-nucleon mixing, but the extension skips key adjustments for separation and antisymmetrization.

read the letter

The main takeaway is the claim that a recent fully quantum treatment of deformation and rotation can be carried over to cluster states, producing two modes: compact-object rotations common in heavy nuclei and distant-object rotations in light clustered systems like 8Be, with 12C showing both. The paper also outlines an extended no-core shell model that adds explicit cluster-nucleon configurations to standard shell-model ones and notes how spin-orbit forces mix in some shell character even when clustering dominates in 12C ground state. The ab initio Monte Carlo results for clustering in Be and C isotopes, including the Hoyle state, are reviewed clearly and line up with earlier work on those nuclei. That part is straightforward and gives a decent starting point for thinking about configuration mixing. The soft spot is the direct extension itself. Cluster states have large inter-alpha distances and require explicit antisymmetrization of the wave function, features that could alter moments of inertia or the rules separating the two modes. The text applies the prior formulation without reported changes for those effects, so the dual-mode distinction in 12C rests on an assumption that may not hold. The fission and molecule analogies are mentioned but not developed. This is for nuclear structure theorists who already work on light nuclei and cluster models. A reader following ab initio or cluster approaches might pick up the mixing framework, but the rotational modes part needs more explicit checks before it can be used. Send it to peer review so the derivations and any adjustments can be examined properly.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews ab initio Monte Carlo Shell Model calculations with Daejeon16 and JISP16 interactions showing alpha clustering in the ground states of 8Be, 10Be, 12Be and 12C, as well as triangular configurations dominating the Hoyle state of 12C. It extends a recently proposed fully quantum formulation for deformation and rotation to these cluster states, proposing dual rotational modes (compact-object rotations common in heavy nuclei and distant-object rotations for clustering states), with 8Be exemplifying the latter and 12C exhibiting both. Section 3 outlines an extended no-core shell model framework incorporating cluster-nucleon configuration interaction, while Section 4 analyzes the competition between cluster and jj-coupling shell-model components in 12C via the antisymmetrized quasi-cluster model, stressing the role of the spin-orbit force. Possible analogies to atomic molecules, hadrons and fission are noted.

Significance. If the direct extension of the quantum formulation to cluster states is validated, the dual-mode proposal supplies a unified description of rotational excitations that distinguishes compact and spatially extended configurations, with concrete implications for the spectroscopy of light nuclei such as 12C. The integration of ab initio results with explicit antisymmetrized cluster configurations and the extended NCSM framework strengthens the microscopic foundation for treating the interplay of shell and cluster degrees of freedom, while the suggested links to molecular and hadronic systems open avenues for cross-disciplinary insight.

major comments (1)

[Section 2] Section 2: the extension of the fully quantum formulation for deformation and rotation to alpha-cluster states is applied without reported modifications to account for large inter-alpha separations or explicit antisymmetrization of the many-body wave function (features emphasized in Sections 3 and 4). This assumption is load-bearing for the distinction between compact-object and distant-object modes and for the claim that 12C exhibits both, because the effective moments of inertia and selection rules may change under these cluster-specific conditions.

minor comments (1)

[Section 2] Section 2: the key equations of the original fully quantum formulation are not restated, so the precise steps of the extension to cluster states cannot be followed in detail.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. The single major comment raises a valid point about the presentation of the extension of the quantum formulation in Section 2. We address it directly below and are prepared to revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section 2] Section 2: the extension of the fully quantum formulation for deformation and rotation to alpha-cluster states is applied without reported modifications to account for large inter-alpha separations or explicit antisymmetrization of the many-body wave function (features emphasized in Sections 3 and 4). This assumption is load-bearing for the distinction between compact-object and distant-object modes and for the claim that 12C exhibits both, because the effective moments of inertia and selection rules may change under these cluster-specific conditions.

Authors: We agree that the presentation in Section 2 would benefit from greater explicitness on this point. The fully quantum formulation is applied to the intrinsic states obtained directly from the ab initio Monte Carlo Shell Model calculations (with Daejeon16 and JISP16), which already incorporate full antisymmetrization of the many-body wave function and the large inter-alpha separations characteristic of the cluster configurations. These features are encoded in the computed energy levels, quadrupole moments, and transition strengths that determine the effective moments of inertia. Consequently, the distinction between compact-object and distant-object rotational modes emerges naturally without requiring additional ad hoc modifications to the formulation itself. The ground state of 12C follows the compact mode while the Hoyle state follows the distant mode, consistent with the triangular alpha configurations identified in the same calculations. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that this reliance on the ab initio inputs was not spelled out sufficiently in Section 2. We will revise the manuscript to add a dedicated paragraph clarifying how the ab initio wave functions supply the necessary accounting for antisymmetrization and separation effects, thereby justifying the direct extension and the resulting mode distinction. This revision will also cross-reference the explicit cluster treatments developed in Sections 3 and 4. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of prior formulation; extension to clusters remains independent

full rationale

The paper reviews external ab initio Monte Carlo Shell Model results for clustering in 8,10,12Be and 12C, then presents the extension of a recently proposed fully quantum formulation to cluster states as original work in Section 2. Dual rotational modes are derived from this application to deformed cluster configurations, without any quoted equation or claim reducing by construction to fitted inputs or self-definitional loops. The self-citation of the prior formulation is present but not load-bearing, as the novel step is the direct application to antisymmetrized cluster states in 8Be and 12C, supported by the reviewed ab initio data rather than circular redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard nuclear many-body methods and interactions from prior literature; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Daejeon16 and JISP16 interactions produce realistic alpha clustering in ab initio calculations for light nuclei.
Invoked in section 2 for Monte Carlo shell model results on Be and C isotopes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5620 in / 1242 out tokens · 25373 ms · 2026-05-15T18:47:16.262473+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Dual rotational modes are proposed: compact-object and distant-object rotations... the recently proposed fully quantum formulation for deformation and rotation is extended to cluster states
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

EJ ≈ E0 + J(J+1) ... origin of the rotational excitation energy is kinetic

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 149 canonical work pages

[1]

Wefelmeier, W.V.: Ein geometrisches modell des atomkerns. Z. Phys. Hadrons Nucl. 107, 332 (1937)

work page 1937
[2]

A., W.J.: Molecular viewpoints in nuclear structure. Phys. Rev. 52, 1083 (1937)

work page 1937
[3]

Morinaga, H.: Interpretation of some of the excited states of 4n self-conjugate nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 101, 254 (1956)

work page 1956
[4]

In: The Proc

Brink, D.: Alpha-particle model of light nuclei. In: The Proc. Intl. School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Course 36, p. 020030 (247)

work page
[5]

Ikeda, K., Takigawa, N., Horiuchi, H.: The Systematic Structure-Change into the Molecule-like Structures in the Self-Conjugate 4n Nuclei. Prog. Thoer. Phys. Suppl. E68, 464–475 (1968) https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.E68.464

work page doi:10.1143/ptps.e68.464 1968
[6]

Advances in Nuclear Physics, vol

Arima, A., Horiuchi, H., Kubodera, K., Takigawa, N.: Clustering in light nucle. Advances in Nuclear Physics, vol. 5, p. 345. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1973)

work page 1973
[7]

Freer, M., Horiuchi, H., Kanada-En’yo, Y., Lee, D., Meißner, U.-G.: Micro- scopic clustering in light nuclei. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90(3), 35004 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.035004 50

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035004 2018
[8]

: Clustering as a window on the hierarchical structure of quantum systems

Nakamura, T., Shigaki, K., Ohnishi, H., et al. : Clustering as a window on the hierarchical structure of quantum systems. Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 273 (2025)

work page 2025
[9]

Otsuka, T., Tsunoda, Y., Shimizu, N., Utsuno, Y., Abe, T., Ueno, H.: Prevailing triaxial shapes in atomic nuclei and a quantum theory of rotation of composite objects. Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 126 (2025)

work page 2025
[10]

Otsuka, T., Abe, T., Yoshida, T., Tsunoda, Y., Shimizu, N., Itagaki, N., Utsuno, Y., Vary, J., Maris, P., Ueno, H.: α-clustering in atomic nuclei from first princi- ples with statistical learning and the hoyle state character. Nat. Commun. 13, 2234 (2022)

work page 2022
[11]

Uegaki, E., Okabe, S., Abe, Y., Tanaka, H.: Structure of the excited states in 12c. i. Prog. Thoer. Phys. 57, 1262 (1977)

work page 1977
[12]

Kamimura, M.: Transition densities between the 0 + 1 , 2 + 1 , 4 + 1 , 0 + 2 , 2 + 2 , 1 − 1 and 3− 1 states in 12c derived from the three-alpha resonating-group wave functions. Nucl. Phys. A 351, 456 (1981)

work page 1981
[13]

Tohsaki, A., Horiuchi, H., Schuck, P., R¨ opke, G.: Alpha cluster con- densation in 12C and 16O. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(19), 192501 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.192501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.192501 2001
[14]

Bijker, R., Iachello, F.: The algebraic cluster model: Three-body clusters. Ann. Phys. 298(2), 334–360 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1006/aphy.2002.6255

work page doi:10.1006/aphy.2002.6255 2002
[15]

Itagaki, N., Aoyama, S., Okabe, S., Ikeda, K.: Cluster-shell competition in light nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 70, 054307 (2004)

work page 2004
[16]

Chernykh, M., Feldmeier, H., Neff, T., Von Neumann-Cosel, P., Richter, A.: Structure of the hoyle state in c12. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 032501 (2007)

work page 2007
[17]

Kanada-En’yo, Y.: The structure of ground and excited states of 12c. Prog. Thoer. Phys. 117, 655 (2007)

work page 2007
[18]

Maris, P., Caprio, M.A., Vary, J.P.: Emergence of rotational bands in ab initio no-core configuration interaction calculations of the be isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 91, 014310 (2015)

work page 2015
[19]

Zhao, P.W., Itagaki, N., Meng, J.: Rod-shaped nuclei at extreme spin and isospin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 022501 (2015)

work page 2015
[20]

Dreyfuss, A.C., Launey, K.D., Dytrych, T., Draayer, J.P., Baker, R.B., Deibel, C.M., Bahri, C.: Understanding emergent collectivity and clustering in nuclei from a symmetry-based no-core shell-model perspective. Phys. Rev. C 95(4), 044312 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.044312

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.044312 2017
[21]

Wiringa, R.B., Pieper, S.C., Carlson, J., Pandharipande, V.R.: Quantum monte carlo calculations of a=8 nuclei. Phys. Rev. C: Nucl. Phys. 62(1), 14001 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.014001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.62.014001 2000
[22]

Carlson, J., Gandolfi, S., Pederiva, F., Pieper, S.C., Schiavilla, R., Schmidt, K.E., Wiringa, R.B.: Quantum monte carlo method for nuclear physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1067 (2015)

work page 2015
[23]

Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H., L¨ ahde, T.A., Lee, D., Meißner, U.-G.: Structure and rotations of the hoyle state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 252501 (2012)

work page 2012
[24]

Ponomarev, V., Ries, P.C., Roth, R., 51 Singer, M., Steinhilber, G., Vobig, K., V., W.: Precision measurement of the e2 transition strength to the 2 + 1 state of 12c

D’Alessio, A., Mongelli, T., Arnold, M., Bassauer, S., Birkhan, J., Brandherm, I., Hilcker, M., H¨ uther, T., Isaak, J., J¨ urgensen, L., Klaus, T., Mathy, M., Neumann-Cosel, P., Pietralla, N., Yu. Ponomarev, V., Ries, P.C., Roth, R., 51 Singer, M., Steinhilber, G., Vobig, K., V., W.: Precision measurement of the e2 transition strength to the 2 + 1 state ...

work page 2020
[25]

: Emergent geometry and duality in the carbon nucleus

Shen, S., Elhatisari, S., L¨ ahde, T.A., et al. : Emergent geometry and duality in the carbon nucleus. Nat. Commun. 14, 2777 (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

Hoyle, F.: On nuclear reactions occuring in very hot stars. 1. The synthesis of elements from carbon to nickel. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 1, 121 (1954)

work page 1954
[27]

Dunbar, D.N.F., Pixley, R.E., Wenzel, W.A., Whaling, W.: The 7.68-mev state in C12. Phys. Rev.92(3), 649–650 (1953) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.92.649

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.92.649 1953
[28]

Freer, M., Fynbo, H.O.U.: The hoyle state in 12c. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 78, 1 (2014)

work page 2014
[29]

: Revised rates for the stellar triple- α process from measurement of 12c nuclear resonances

Fynbo, H.O.U., et al. : Revised rates for the stellar triple- α process from measurement of 12c nuclear resonances. Nature 433, 136–139 (2005)

work page 2005
[30]

Nature 588, 57–60 (2020)

Jin, S., Roberts, L.F., Austin, S.M., Schatz, H.: Enhanced triple- α reaction reduces proton-rich nucleosynthesis in supernovae. Nature 588, 57–60 (2020)

work page 2020
[31]

Shirokov, A.M., Shin, I.J., Kim, Y., Sosonkina, M., P., M., Vary, J.P.: N3lo nn interaction adjusted to light nuclei in ab exitu approach. Phys. Lett. B 761, 87 (2016)

work page 2016
[32]

Shirokov, A.M., Vary, J.P., Mazur, A.I., Weber, T.A.: Realistic nuclear hamil- tonian: Ab exitu approach. Phys. Lett. B 644, 33 (2007)

work page 2007
[33]

Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File

National Nuclear Data Center’s “Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File”. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/

work page
[34]

Honma, M., Mizusaki, T., Otsuka, T.: Diagonalization of hamiltonians for many- body systems by auxiliary field quantum monte carlo technique. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1284 (1995)

work page 1995
[35]

Otsuka, T., Mizusaki, T., Honma, M.: Structure of the n=z=28 closed shell studied by monte carlo shell model calculation. Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1588 (1998)

work page 1998
[36]

Otsuka, T., Honma, M., Mizusaki, T., Shimizu, N., Utsuno, Y.: Monte carlo shell model for atomic nuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47, 319–400 (2001)

work page 2001
[37]

: New-generation monte carlo shell model for the k computer era

Shimizu, N., et al. : New-generation monte carlo shell model for the k computer era. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 01–205 (2012)

work page 2012
[38]

Abe, T. at al. .: Benchmarks of the full configuration interaction, monte carlo shell model, and no-core full configuration methods. Phys. Rev. C 86, 054301 (2012)

work page 2012
[39]

Abe, T., et al.: Ground-state properties of light 4 n self-conjugate nuclei in ab initio no-core monte carlo shell model with nonlocal nn interactions. Phys. Rev. C 104, 054315

work page
[40]

Springer, Berlin (2009)

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Second Edition. Springer, Berlin (2009)

work page 2009
[41]

Strinati, G.C., Pieri, P., R¨ opke, G., Schuck, P., Urban, M.: The bcs–bec crossover: From ultra-cold fermi gases to nuclear systems. Phys. Rept. 738, 1 (2018)

work page 2018
[42]

Bohr, A.: The coupling of nuclear surface oscillations to the motion of individual nucleons. Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 26, 14 (1952)

work page 1952
[43]

Bohr, A., Mottelson, B.R.: Collective and individual-particle aspects of nuclear structure. Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 27, 16 (1953) 52

work page 1953
[44]

In: Lundqvist, S

Bohr, A.N.: Rotational motion in nuclei. In: Lundqvist, S. (ed.) Nobel Lectures, Physics 1971–1980, p. 213. World Scientific, Singapore,1992

work page 1971
[45]

Bohr, A., Mottelson, B.R.: Nuclear Structure, Vol. II. Benjamin, New York (1975)

work page 1975
[46]

Springer, Berlin (1980)

Ring, P., Schuck, P.: The Nuclear Many-Body Problem. Springer, Berlin (1980)

work page 1980
[47]

In: Lundqvist, S

Johansson, S.: Award ceremony speech, 1975. In: Lundqvist, S. (ed.) Nobel Lectures, Physics 1971–1980. World Scientific, Singapore, 1992

work page 1975
[48]

EPJ Web of Conferences 342, 01021 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534201021

Otsuka, T.: A comprehensive view of nuclear shapes, rotations and vibrations from fully quantum mechanical perspectives. EPJ Web of Conferences 342, 01021 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534201021

work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202534201021 2025
[50]

Zimmerman, W.R., Destefano, N.E., Freer, M., Gai, M., Smit, F.D.: Further evidence for the broad 2 + 2 state at 9.6 mev in 12c. Phys. Rev. C 84, 027304 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.027304

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.027304 2011
[51]

Zimmerman, W.R., Ahmed, M.W., Bromberger, B., Stave, S.C., Breskin, A., Dangendorf, V., Delbar, T., Gai, M., Henshaw, S.S., Mueller, J.M., Sun, C., Tittelmeier, K., Weller, H.R., Wu, Y.K.: Unambiguous identification of the sec- ond 2+ state in 12C and the structure of the hoyle state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 152502 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.152502 2013
[52]

EPJ Web of Conferences 66, 02074 (2014)

Ogloblin, A.A., et al.: Rotational band in 12c based on the hoyle state. EPJ Web of Conferences 66, 02074 (2014)

work page 2014
[53]

: Evidence for triangular d 3h symmetry in 12c

Mar’in-L’ambarri, D.J., et al. : Evidence for triangular d 3h symmetry in 12c. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 012502 (2014)

work page 2014
[54]

Funaki, Y.: Hoyle band and α condensation in 12C. Phys. Rev. C 92, 021302 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.021302

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.021302 2015
[55]

Marevi´ c, P., Ebran, J.-P., Khan, E., Nikˇ sic, T., Vretenar, D.: Cluster structures in 12C from global energy density functionals. Phys. Rev. C 99, 034317 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.034317

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.034317 2019
[56]

Danilov, A.N., Belyaeva, T.L., Demyanova, A.S., Goncharov, S.A., Ogloblin, A.A.: Determination of nuclear radii for unstable states in 12c with diffraction inelastic scattering. Phys. Rev. C 80, 054603 (2009)

work page 2009
[57]

Otsuka, T., Utsuno, Y.: Quantum appearance of tennis racket effect in atomic nuclei and conservation of K quantum number (tentative) (2026)

work page 2026
[58]

Bijker, R., Iachello, F.: Evidence for tetrahedral symmetry in 16o. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 152501 (2014)

work page 2014
[59]

Springer, Berlin (2012)

Atkins, P., Paula, J., Keeler, J.: Physical Chemistry. Springer, Berlin (2012)

work page 2012
[60]

Springer, Berlin (2012)

Krappe, J.K., Pomorski, K.: Theory of Nuclear Fission. Springer, Berlin (2012)

work page 2012
[61]

: Angular momentum generation in nuclear fission

Wilson, J.N., et al. : Angular momentum generation in nuclear fission. Nature 590, 566 (2021)

work page 2021
[62]

Gamow, G.: Mass defect curve and nuclear constitution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 126(803), 632–644 (1930) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1930.0032

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1930.0032 1930
[63]

Hafstad, L.R., Teller, E.: The alpha-particle model of the nucleus. Phys. Rev. 53 54(9), 681–692 (1938) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.54.681

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.54.681 1938
[64]

Dover Books on Physics

Blatt, J.M., Weisskopf, V.F.: Theoretical Nuclear Physics. Dover Books on Physics. Dover Publications, New York (2012)

work page 2012
[65]

Commun Phys 5(1), 1–6 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-01105-9

Volya, A., Barbui, M., Goldberg, V.Z., Rogachev, G.V.: Superradi- ance in alpha clustered mirror nuclei. Commun Phys 5(1), 1–6 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-01105-9

work page doi:10.1038/s42005-022-01105-9 2022
[66]

EPJ Web Conf

Sandulescu, N., Sambataro, M., Volya, A.: Proton-neutron pairing, quartet con- densation and A− transfer in N=Z nuclei. EPJ Web Conf. 292, 1003 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429201003

work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429201003 2024
[67]

White, C., Volya, A., Mulhall, D., Zelevinsky, V.: Structured ground states of randomly interacting bosons. Phys. Rev. Res. 5(1), 013109 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013109

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013109 2023
[68]

Kanada-En’yo, Y., Kimura, M., Ono, A.: Antisymmetrized molecular dynamics and its applications to cluster phenomena. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012(1), 1–202 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/pts001

work page doi:10.1093/ptep/pts001 2012
[69]

Wheeler, J.A.: On the mathematical description of light nuclei by the method of resonating group structure. Phys. Rev. 52(11), 1107–1122 (1937) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.52.1107

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.52.1107 1937
[70]

Wildermuth, K., Kanellopoulos, E.J.: Clustering aspects in nuclei and their microscopic description. Rep. Prog. Phys. 42(10), 1719 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/42/10/003

work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/42/10/003 1979
[71]

Draayer, J.P.: Alpha-particle spectroscopic amplitudes for sd shell nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 237(1), 157–181 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(75)90470-4

work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(75)90470-4 1975
[72]

Smirnov, Y.F., Tchuvilsky, Y.M.: Cluster Spectroscopic Fac- tors for P-Shell Nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 15(1), 84–93 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.15.84

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.15.84 1977
[73]

Chung, W., van Hienen, J., Wildenthal, B.H., Bennett, C.L.: Shell-model predictions of alpha-spectroscopic factors between ground states of 16 ≤a≤40 nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 79(4), 381–384 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370- 2693(78)90387-8

work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1978
[74]

Anantaraman, N., Bennett, C.L., Draayer, J.P., Fulbright, H.W., Gove, H.E., To ¯ oke, J.: Systematics of ground-state α-particle spectroscopic strengths for sd- and fp-shell nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35(17), 1131–1134 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1131

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.35.1131 1975
[75]

Dreyfuss, A.C., Launey, K.D., Escher, J.E., Sargsyan, G.H., Baker, R.B., Dytrych, T., Draayer, J.P.: Clustering and $\ensuremath{\alpha}$- capture reaction rate from ab initio symmetry-adapted descriptions of $ˆ{20}\mathrm{Ne}$. Phys. Rev. C 102(4), 044608 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044608

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.044608 2020
[76]

Dytrych, T., Launey, K.D., Draayer, J.P., Rowe, D.J., Wood, J.L., Rosen- steel, G., Bahri, C., Langr, D., Baker, R.B.: Physics of Nuclei: Key Role of an Emergent Symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(4), 042501 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.042501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.042501 2020
[77]

Nature 487(7407), 341 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11246 54

Ebran, J.-P., Khan, E., Nikˇ si´ c, T., Vretenar, D.: How atomic nuclei cluster. Nature 487(7407), 341 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11246 54

work page doi:10.1038/nature11246 2012
[78]

Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H., Lee, D., Meißner, U.-G.: Ab initio calcu- lation of the hoyle state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(19), 192501 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.192501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.192501 2011
[79]

Nature528(7580), 111–114 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16067

Elhatisari, S., Lee, D., Rupak, G., Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H., L¨ ahde, T.A., Luu, T., Meißner, U.-G.: Ab initio alpha–alpha scattering. Nature528(7580), 111–114 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16067

work page doi:10.1038/nature16067 2015
[80]

Schuck, P., Funaki, Y., Horiuchi, H., R¨ opke, G., Tohsaki, A., Yamada, T.: Alpha particle clusters and their condensation in nuclear systems. Phys. Scr. 91(12), 123001 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/91/12/123001

work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/91/12/123001 2016
[81]

Tohsaki, A., Horiuchi, H., Schuck, P., R¨ opke, G.: Colloquium: Status of α- particle condensate structure of the hoyle state. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89(1), 11002 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.011002

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.011002 2017

Showing first 80 references.