Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 10 cited by

A non-perturbative definition of the IIA/IIB domain wall is obtained by gauging left-moving fermion parity at zero string coupling in matrix string theory.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 19:23 UTC pith:4RM6E2QY

load-bearing objection A clean proposal for an explicit IIA/IIB wall at g_s=0; the finite-coupling dictionary is the load-bearing conjecture. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2603.02199 v3 pith:4RM6E2QY submitted 2026-03-02 hep-th

A Matrix Theory Construction of the IIA/IIB Wall

Ethan Torres This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords IIA/IIB wallmatrix string theorydiscrete light-cone quantizationD0-branesnon-BPS branesfermion parity gaugingcondensation defectsymmetric orbifold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that the long-conjectured domain wall separating Type IIA and Type IIB superstrings can be defined exactly in a non-perturbative matrix description of string theory, rather than merely postulated from consistency arguments. The construction works by letting the string coupling vanish along a lightlike hypersurface and gauging the left-moving fermion parity symmetry of the IIA string on one side, which turns the IIA matrix string theory into the IIB matrix string theory. The paper argues that BPS D0-branes of IIA cross the wall and become non-BPS D0-branes of IIB, that the left-moving Ramond states of IIB become massive string-scale states on the IIA side, and that the wall has finite string-frame tension. If correct, this gives the first non-perturbative definition of a wall whose existence is required by the cobordism conjecture, and opens a concrete framework for studying how branes transform between the two ten-dimensional superstring theories.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the IIB matrix string theory at zero coupling is a Z2 orbifold of the IIA matrix string theory by the left-moving spacetime fermion parity (−1)^{F_L}, and that this relation can be promoted from a global orbifold to a position-dependent, half-space gauging. When the string coupling is tuned to vanish on a neighborhood of a lightlike slice, gauging (−1)^{F_L} only on one side of that slice defines a codimension-one topological condensation defect that interpolates between the two string theories. Along this defect, the paper shows that D0-brane charge is not conserved across the wall: a BPS IIA D0-brane, represented in the symmetric-orbifold CFT by a flux sector

What carries the argument

The key identity is that the IIB lightcone worldsheet is obtained from the IIA one by gauging the left-moving fermion parity (−1)^{F_L}, so at zero string coupling the IIB matrix string theory is the Z2 orbifold of the IIA symmetric-orbifold CFT. The construction's load-bearing mechanism is a codimension-one half-space gauging of this Z2 symmetry along the wall slice, combined with a position-dependent string coupling that vanishes at the wall. The defect Hilbert space of this gauging contains the states that become non-BPS IIB D0-branes and the massive (−1)^{F_L}=-1 states on the IIA side.

Load-bearing premise

The construction collapses if the matrix string theories do not exactly reproduce IIA and IIB string theory in the large-N limit, or if the half-space gauging of left-moving fermion parity at the zero-coupling slice is not a well-defined, anomaly-free operation.

What would settle it

Compute the ground-state energy of the defect sector (the chirally twisted sector) at small nonzero string coupling: if it is zero or negative rather than a positive string-scale mass, the paper's claim that left-moving Ramond states become massive on the other side of the wall is wrong.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The IIA/IIB wall exists as a genuine object in the non-perturbative matrix definition of ten-dimensional string theory, not just as a formal solution to a consistency conjecture.
  • BPS D0-branes in IIA transmute into non-BPS D0-branes in IIB upon crossing the wall, and D0 charge is not conserved across it.
  • States with (−1)^{F_L}=-1, including IIB left-moving Ramond states, become string-scale massive on the other side of the wall because their ground-state energy is not protected by supersymmetry once the coupling is nonzero.
  • The wall's string-frame tension is finite and actually vanishes in the strictly zero-coupling core, consistent with the cobordism conjecture's requirement of a finite-tension domain wall.
  • The construction provides a concrete dictionary involving flux sectors and conformal interfaces for engineering D0-branes localized along a lightlike direction in matrix string theory, which can be used to track brane transmutation across the wall.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to compute the exact mass of the would-be non-BPS D0-brane at small nonzero string coupling; the paper argues it is string-scale, but the precise value should be calculable and may depend on the wall profile.
  • The same half-space gauging mechanism could be applied to construct lightlike walls between other string theories related by discrete orbifolds, or to give matrix definitions of other predicted non-BPS branes by attaching the fermion-parity line to a local operator.
  • If the finite-N version of the construction has a holographic dual, it predicts a concrete interface or cobordism-defect solution in the dual gravitational theory that could be searched for in supergravity.
  • The expected non-locality of the wall worldvolume theory suggests an explicit example where chiral fields acquire mass through a non-perturbative symmetric mass generation, which would sharpen bottom-up constraints on domain-wall tensions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a non-perturbative, DLCQ-based construction of a lightlike domain wall separating type IIA and IIB string theories. After reviewing the matrix string theory (MST) descriptions of IIA (large-N 2D N=(8,8) SYM) and IIB (large-N k=1 ABJM on T^2), the paper defines the wall by setting the string coupling g_s(τ) to zero in a neighborhood of τ0 and gauging (−1)^{F_L}_{IIA} on half of the MST spacetime. At g_s=0 this is a codimension-1 condensation defect in the symmetric orbifold CFT, and Appendix A shows the IIB worldsheet is the corresponding Z2 orbifold of the IIA worldsheet. The paper claims that fundamental strings and BPS D0-branes cross from IIA to IIB, with D0-branes becoming non-BPS, and that the wall has finite string-frame tension consistent with the cobordism conjecture.

Significance. Conditional on the BFSS/MST and ABJM large-N equivalences, the construction is a new and concrete proposal for an object previously only conjectured. Its strengths are that the g_s=0 core is defined precisely in a solvable symmetric orbifold CFT, the orbifold relation in Appendix A is explicit and checkable, and the construction has no fitted parameters; it also yields sharp qualitative predictions (e.g., vanishing tension at g_s=0, mass generation for (−1)^{F_L}=−1 states). However, the proposal's reach beyond the free CFT point is limited by the unproven position-dependent coupling dictionary and the missing finite-coupling interface calculation. If these gaps are filled, the paper would provide a valuable non-perturbative definition; in its present form it is best read as a well-formulated conjecture.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, first paragraph] The construction's foundation is the assertion that the MST dictionaries (2.4) and (2.6), derived for constant asymptotic couplings, can be promoted to any smooth function φ(X^+) by making R(τ) or R2/R1(τ) position-dependent. No derivation is given, and the finite-N holographic remark does not address the strict N→∞ flat-space limit. Because the wall profile g_s(τ) is the only external input, this is load-bearing; without a proof or at least a precise conjecture for the τ-dependent dictionary, the wall is not yet defined as a 10D interface.
  2. [Section 3, IIA/IIB Wall Definition and Figure 1] The wall is defined by half-space gauging at g_s=0, where the IIB MST is a Z2 orbifold of the IIA MST. For finite g_s, the IIB side is a 3D k=1 ABJM theory (Section 2.2), and the paper does not show that the 2D half-line gauging plus the '2D→3D decompactification' deformation reproduces ABJM on T^2 with the desired R2/R1(τ). The definition is therefore a defect in a free 2D CFT; its identification with an interface to finite-coupling IIB string theory is an unverified assumption. The missing calculation is acknowledged in Section 3.2 ('we leave a precise calculation of this tension ... for future work'). This gap is central to the paper's claim.
  3. [Section 3.1, D0-brane crossing] The headline consequence that BPS IIA D0-branes become non-BPS IIB D0-branes is not derived. The D0 charge and Wilson-line construction are described, but the boundary conditions (3.4) are chosen ('we choose Dirichlet') rather than shown to follow from the D0-vacuum, and the conclusion relies on the statement in [1] that (−1)^{F_L} gauging turns BPS into non-BPS boundary conditions. No computation tracks the flux sector through the wall or verifies that the resulting object is the IIB non-BPS D0 with the correct mass/charge. For a claim highlighted in the abstract, a more explicit dictionary is needed.
  4. [Section 3.2, Finite string frame tension] The argument that the wall has finite string-frame tension rests on the claim that g_s=0 is 'adiabatically connected' to small position-dependent g_s(τ). Since g_s=0 lies at infinite distance in dilaton moduli space, this is not self-evident; and the precise tension is left for future work. The finite-tension conclusion is used to connect to the Cobordism Conjecture, so it is not a side remark. The authors should either provide a calculation or explicitly label this as a conjecture.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, wall definition] The interval notation is inconsistent: the definition says gauging in τ∈[0,τ0+ϵ), while the next sentence refers to half-interval (τ0−ϵ,τ0+ϵ), and Figure 1 says 'to the right of the red line.' Please clarify the intended region and coordinate ranges.
  2. [Eq. (3.8)] The profile has a typo ('is can be described') and the parameters c and g_{s,0} should be defined explicitly; also note that the profile is not differentiable at |τ|=c, which conflicts with the earlier requirement of a smooth φ(X^+).
  3. [Introduction/Note added] The relation to the contemporaneous construction [15] is not discussed. A brief comparison of the two proposals would help the reader place the present work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the wall construction is an explicit definition built on the independently re-derived IIB=IIA/(-1)^{F_L} orbifold relation, and the D0-crossing consequence follows from that definition.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. Its background equivalences (BFSS/MST and k=1 ABJM) are external conjectures cited to Banks-Fischler-Shenker-Susskind, Dijkgraaf-Verlinde-Verlinde, and Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena, not outputs of this paper. The load-bearing fact that the IIB worldsheet at g_s=0 is the Z2 orbifold of the IIA worldsheet by (-1)^{F_L} is a classic result and is re-derived in Appendix A, so it does not depend on a self-citation. The 'IIA/IIB Wall Definition' in Section 3 is explicitly a definition: set g_s(τ)=0 on a neighborhood and gauge (-1)^{F_L} on a half-interval. Consequences such as fundamental strings converting between IIA and IIB and BPS D0-boundary conditions becoming non-BPS under the gauging follow directly from that definition, with [3] as an independent reference for the non-BPS boundary-condition statement; they are not fitted parameters or renamed inputs. The paper's self-citations to [1] (which shares an author) are motivational/consistency checks, e.g. 'It was argued in [1] that BPS D-branes should become non-BPS D-branes when crossing the IIA/IIB wall,' and a peripheral footnote about Z2-valued charge; they are not load-bearing because the construction's validity rests on the independent orbifold derivation and the external MST conjectures. The paper itself flags unproven steps, notably 'While we leave a precise calculation of this tension ... for future work' and 'A more refined estimate of such masses ... would be interesting to pursue in future work.' These are correctness risks concerning the position-dependent coupling dictionary and the mass estimates, not circularity. Score 2 reflects the presence of minor, non-load-bearing self-citations; the central construction and its immediate consequences have independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The construction is an overlay on the BFSS/MST and ABJM conjectures; the only hand-chosen input is the coupling profile g_s(τ). No numerically fitted parameters appear, and no genuinely new fundamental entity is introduced beyond the wall itself.

free parameters (1)
  • g_s(τ) profile (and example parameters g_{s,0}, c) = arbitrary smooth function with g_s(τ0)=0; example (3.8) uses g_{s,0} and c
    The wall is defined for any coupling profile vanishing at τ0; neither the profile nor its parameters are derived, and the wall properties (e.g. tension) depend on this choice.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption BFSS/MST conjecture: IIA string theory in 10D flat space equals large-N 2D N=(8,8) U(N) SYM (Matrix String Theory).
    Invoked throughout Section 2.1 and used as the IIA side of the wall; unproven, though supported by evidence.
  • domain assumption IIB MST conjecture: IIB string theory in 10D flat space equals large-N k=1 ABJM on T^2 (U(N)_1 × U(N)_−1).
    Section 2.2; central to identifying the IIB side of the wall.
  • domain assumption Position-dependent string coupling g_s(τ) in MST corresponds to a spacetime dilaton profile g_s(X^+).
    Section 3: the wall is built by letting g_s vanish at τ0; this identification is assumed without derivation.
  • standard math The half-space gauging of (−1)^{F_L} is a well-defined, anomaly-free codimension-1 condensation defect.
    Invoked in Section 3 using results [41–43]; needed for the wall to be a consistent interface.
  • domain assumption D0 charge in IIA MST is Q_D0 = ∫ Tr(F) and the D0 flux vacuum is gapped.
    Section 3.1, following [18,45]; used to identify the D0-brane configuration crossing the wall.
  • standard math Wilson lines in U(N) can act as conformal interfaces with Dirichlet boundary conditions (3.4) in the g_s→0 limit.
    Section 3.1, from [46,47]; used to engineer the localized D0-brane and its open-string spectrum.
invented entities (1)
  • Lightlike IIA/IIB domain wall no independent evidence
    purpose: A codimension-1 defect interpolating between Type IIA and IIB string theories, required by Swampland cobordism and charge completeness.
    The wall is the constructed object itself, not an external observable; its properties (D0 transition, finite tension) are consistency checks within the framework rather than independently falsifiable predictions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13128 in / 14974 out tokens · 119307 ms · 2026-08-02T19:23:00.521652+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this note, we give a non-perturbative construction of a lightlike domain wall separating IIA and IIB string theories in 10D in the framework of discrete light-cone quantization (DLCQ). In this setting, generalizations of the BFSS conjecture relate the 10D flat space limit to matrix string theories (MSTs) for IIA and IIB. The former is equivalent to the large-$N$ limit of 2D Super Yang-Mills theory, while the latter is the large-$N$ limit of 3D ABJM theory with $\pm 1$ Chern-Simons levels. Our construction requires the string coupling to vanish at the location of the wall, and we show that BPS IIA $D0$-branes become non-BPS IIB $D0$-branes as they cross it, as anticipated in \cite{Heckman:2025wqd}.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.02199 by Ethan Torres.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Matrix string theory construction of IIA/IIB wall. The ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 10D Minkowski spacetime illustration of IIA/IIB wall located at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Symmetric orbifold configuration on Rτ × S 1 σ dual to a BPS IIA D0-brane localized along X−. We have conformal interfaces (blue lines) separating the symmetric orbifold from the gapped D0-brane vacuum. The black lines are identified. The orange lines represent a single GS string with Dirichlet boundary conditions on the interfaces. These conformal interfaces are the IR limit of U(N) Wilson lines in conjug… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 2D State-operator correspondence between a non-genuine local operator with a symmetry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Art of Networking: Networks of Trivalent 10d Heterotic Junctions

    hep-th 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper constructs arbitrary networks of 10d non-tachyonic heterotic string theories via cobordism-implied junctions and gives worldsheet realizations for graphs, higher-dimensional networks, and compact configurati...

  2. The Art of Branching: Cobordism Junctions of 10d String Theories

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Explicit worldsheet constructions of 9d junctions joining several 10d string theories via generalized RG flow interpolations and closed tachyon condensation, providing dynamical realizations of multi-theory cobordisms.

  3. AdS$_9$ solutions in type II supergravities

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New analytic AdS9 solutions in type IIB with finite action and central charge, numerical massive IIA solutions with diverging action, and perturbative dS9 solutions are constructed in type II supergravities.

  4. A missing link: Brane networks and the Cobordism Conjecture

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Defects tied to discrete symmetries via bordism groups Ω^ξ_2(BG) and homology H_2(BG;Z) are codimension-two branes that participate in networks with junctions, expanding the Cobordism Conjecture's predictions in strin...

  5. A missing link: Brane networks and the Cobordism Conjecture

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Defects for discrete symmetries encoded in bordism groups Ω^ξ_2(BG) and H_2(BG;Z) are described as brane networks rather than isolated objects, extending the Cobordism Conjecture and demonstrated in 4d supergravity fr...

  6. Bordisms between 9d type IIB supergravities and commutator widths of duality groups

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes a refinement of the Swampland Cobordism Conjecture for Ω1(BG) with duality bundle G, where diverging commutator width of G requires infinitely many duality defects to realize monodromies via gravitational solitons.

  7. Bordisms between 9d type IIB supergravities and commutator widths of duality groups

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes a refinement of the Swampland Cobordism Conjecture for duality groups, arguing that diverging commutator widths necessitate infinitely many duality defects to realize monodromies in 9d supergravity bordisms.

  8. Heterotic Ouroboros

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    The seven non-supersymmetric heterotic strings are re-derived from M-theory on S^1∨S^1 via an 'ouroboros' type I' configuration whose rules are fitted to reproduce the known spectra; new junctions among the theories a...

  9. Heterotic Ouroboros

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    M-theory on S1 vee S1 with quotients and type I' mechanisms reproduces the light spectra and gauge groups of 10D heterotic theories, with evidence for junctions among them.

  10. Heterotic Ouroboros

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A consistent set of rules from M-theory on S¹ ∨ S¹ combined with type I' enhancements reproduces the light spectra, gauge groups, and global structure of ten-dimensional heterotic string theories, with indications of ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 52 linked inside Pith · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    GSO Defects: IIA/IIB Walls and the Surprisingly Stable R7-Brane,

    J. J. Heckman, J. McNamara, J. Parra-Martinez, and E. Torres, “GSO Defects: IIA/IIB Walls and the Surprisingly Stable R7-Brane,”arXiv:2507.21210 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    D-branes and K-theory,

    E. Witten, “D-branes and K-theory,”JHEP12(1998) 019,arXiv:hep-th/9810188. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    NonBPS states and Branes in string theory,

    A. Sen, “NonBPS states and Branes in string theory,” inAdvanced School on Supersymmetry in the Theories of Fields, Strings and Branes, pp. 187–234. 1, 1999. arXiv:hep-th/9904207

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    IIB string theory explored: Reflection 7-branes,

    M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, M. Montero, and E. Torres, “IIB string theory explored: Reflection 7-branes,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 8, (2023) 086015,arXiv:2212.05077 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    R7-branes as charge conjugation operators,

    M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, M. Montero, and E. Torres, “R7-branes as charge conjugation operators,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 4, (2024) 046004,arXiv:2305.05689 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic Branes,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, “Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic Branes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131no. 12, (2023) 121601,arXiv:2303.17623 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    On non-supersymmetric heterotic branes,

    J. Kaidi, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, “On non-supersymmetric heterotic branes,” JHEP03(2025) 211,arXiv:2411.04344 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa, “Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,” arXiv:1909.10355 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1909

  9. [9]

    Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg, “Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 084019,arXiv:1011.5120 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  10. [10]

    Topological Operators and Completeness of Spectrum in Discrete Gauge Theories,

    T. Rudelius and S.-H. Shao, “Topological Operators and Completeness of Spectrum in Discrete Gauge Theories,”JHEP12(2020) 172,arXiv:2006.10052 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum,

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, “Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum,”JHEP09 (2021) 203,arXiv:2104.07036 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Elementary Constituents Conjecture,

    V. Nevoa, S. Raman, and C. Vafa, “Elementary Constituents Conjecture,” arXiv:2511.13813 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  13. [13]

    Dimension-changing exact solutions of string theory,

    S. Hellerman and I. Swanson, “Dimension-changing exact solutions of string theory,” JHEP09(2007) 096,arXiv:hep-th/0612051

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  14. [14]

    Charting the landscape of supercritical string theory,

    S. Hellerman and I. Swanson, “Charting the landscape of supercritical string theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 171601,arXiv:0705.0980 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  15. [15]

    What IIB looks IIA string: String Cobordisms via Non-Compact CFTs,

    E. Anastasi, M. Montero, A. M. Uranga, and C. Wang, “What IIB looks IIA string: String Cobordisms via Non-Compact CFTs,”arXiv:2603.00225 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, “M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,”Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5112–5128,arXiv:hep-th/9610043. 14

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  17. [17]

    The BFSS conjecture, a review,

    J. Maldacena, “The BFSS conjecture, a review,”Strings 2024 https://indico.cern.ch/event/1284995/contributions/5975486/attachments/ 2869735/5024000/Maldacena.pdf

    arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Matrix string theory,

    R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “Matrix string theory,”Nucl. Phys. B500(1997) 43–61,arXiv:hep-th/9703030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  19. [19]

    TASI lectures on matrix theory,

    T. Banks, “TASI lectures on matrix theory,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 99): Strings, Branes, and Gravity, pp. 495–542. 5, 1999.arXiv:hep-th/9911068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  20. [20]

    M(atrix) Theory: Matrix Quantum Mechanics as a Fundamental Theory,

    W. Taylor, “M(atrix) Theory: Matrix Quantum Mechanics as a Fundamental Theory,”Rev. Mod. Phys.73(2001) 419–462,arXiv:hep-th/0101126

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  21. [21]

    TASI lectures on Matrix Theory from a modern viewpoint,

    H. W. Lin, “TASI lectures on Matrix Theory from a modern viewpoint,” arXiv:2508.20970 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    On the Flux Sectors of Matrix String Theory,

    M. Cho, B. Gabai, J. Scheinpflug, and X. Yin, “On the Flux Sectors of Matrix String Theory,”arXiv:2601.03336 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  23. [23]

    Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,

    N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,”Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 046004,arXiv:hep-th/9802042

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  24. [24]

    M theory and the light cone,

    J. Polchinski, “M theory and the light cone,”Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.134(1999) 158–170,arXiv:hep-th/9903165

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  25. [25]

    An SL(2,Z) multiplet of type IIB superstrings,

    J. H. Schwarz, “An SL(2,Z) multiplet of type IIB superstrings,”Phys. Lett. B360 (1995) 13–18,arXiv:hep-th/9508143. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 364, 252 (1995)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  26. [26]

    Some relationships between dualities in string theory,

    P. S. Aspinwall, “Some relationships between dualities in string theory,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.46(1996) 30–38,arXiv:hep-th/9508154

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  27. [27]

    The power of M theory,

    J. H. Schwarz and M. Dine, “The power of M theory,”Phys. Lett. B367(1996) 97–103,arXiv:hep-th/9510086

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  28. [28]

    Evidence for F theory,

    C. Vafa, “Evidence for F theory,”Nucl. Phys. B469(1996) 403–418, arXiv:hep-th/9602022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  29. [29]

    Proposals on nonperturbative superstring interactions,

    L. Motl, “Proposals on nonperturbative superstring interactions,” arXiv:hep-th/9701025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Strings from matrices,

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg, “Strings from matrices,”Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 41–55, arXiv:hep-th/9702187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  31. [31]

    Rotational invariance in the M(atrix) formulation of type IIB theory,

    S. Sethi and L. Susskind, “Rotational invariance in the M(atrix) formulation of type IIB theory,”Phys. Lett. B400(1997) 265–268,arXiv:hep-th/9702101. 15

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  32. [32]

    Matrix Theory of Type IIB Plane Wave from Membranes,

    J. Gomis, A. J. Salim, and F. Passerini, “Matrix Theory of Type IIB Plane Wave from Membranes,”JHEP08(2008) 002,arXiv:0804.2186 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    Gauge symmetry and supersymmetry of multiple M2-branes,

    J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Gauge symmetry and supersymmetry of multiple M2-branes,”Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 065008,arXiv:0711.0955 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Algebraic structures on parallel M2-branes,

    A. Gustavsson, “Algebraic structures on parallel M2-branes,”Nucl. Phys. B811 (2009) 66–76,arXiv:0709.1260 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [35]

    Constraining Maximally Supersymmetric Membrane Actions,

    J. P. Gauntlett and J. B. Gutowski, “Constraining Maximally Supersymmetric Membrane Actions,”JHEP06(2008) 053,arXiv:0804.3078 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  36. [36]

    Prolongations of lie algebras and applications,

    P.-A. Nagy, “Prolongations of lie algebras and applications,” 2008. https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1398

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    M2-branes, 3-Lie Algebras and Plucker relations,

    G. Papadopoulos, “M2-branes, 3-Lie Algebras and Plucker relations,”JHEP05(2008) 054,arXiv:0804.2662 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, “N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,”JHEP10(2008) 091,arXiv:0806.1218 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  39. [39]

    Enhanced N=8 Supersymmetry of ABJM Theory on R**8 and R**8/Z(2),

    A. Gustavsson and S.-J. Rey, “Enhanced N=8 Supersymmetry of ABJM Theory on R**8 and R**8/Z(2),”arXiv:0906.3568 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    A Large N reduced model as superstring,

    N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, “A Large N reduced model as superstring,”Nucl. Phys. B498(1997) 467–491,arXiv:hep-th/9612115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  41. [41]

    Higher central charges and topological boundaries in 2+1-dimensional TQFTs,

    J. Kaidi, Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, “Higher central charges and topological boundaries in 2+1-dimensional TQFTs,”SciPost Phys.13 no. 3, (2022) 067,arXiv:2107.13091 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 12, (2022) 125016, arXiv:2111.01139 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, “Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,”Commun. Math. Phys.401no. 3, (2023) 3043–3107, arXiv:2204.02407 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 2: LOOP AMPLITUDES, ANOMALIES AND PHENOMENOLOGY. 7, 1988

    1988

  45. [45]

    Quantum Vacua of 2d Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,

    M. Kolo˘ glu, “Quantum Vacua of 2d Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” JHEP11(2017) 140,arXiv:1609.08232 [hep-th]. 16

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    Permeable conformal walls and holography,

    C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf, and H. Ooguri, “Permeable conformal walls and holography,”JHEP06(2002) 027,arXiv:hep-th/0111210

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  47. [47]

    D-branes in the Green-Schwarz formalism,

    N. D. Lambert and P. C. West, “D-branes in the Green-Schwarz formalism,”Phys. Lett. B459(1999) 515–521,arXiv:hep-th/9905031

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  48. [48]

    Cobordism Conjecture in AdS,

    H. Ooguri and T. Takayanagi, “Cobordism Conjecture in AdS,”arXiv:2006.13953 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    Gravitational Background of Alice-Vortices and R7-Branes,

    A. C ¸ avu¸ so˘ glu, M. Cvetiˇ c, J. J. Heckman, J. Kuntz, and C. Murdia, “Gravitational Background of Alice-Vortices and R7-Branes,”arXiv:2602.13196 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    The Heterotic life of the D particle,

    U. H. Danielsson and G. Ferretti, “The Heterotic life of the D particle,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12(1997) 4581–4596,arXiv:hep-th/9610082

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  51. [51]

    Quaternions and M(atrix) theory in spaces with boundaries,

    L. Motl, “Quaternions and M(atrix) theory in spaces with boundaries,” arXiv:hep-th/9612198

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    On gauge bosons in the matrix model approach to M theory,

    S. Kachru and E. Silverstein, “On gauge bosons in the matrix model approach to M theory,”Phys. Lett. B396(1997) 70–76,arXiv:hep-th/9612162

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  53. [53]

    Bound states of type I-prime D particles and enhanced gauge symmetry,

    D. A. Lowe, “Bound states of type I-prime D particles and enhanced gauge symmetry,”Nucl. Phys. B501(1997) 134–142,arXiv:hep-th/9702006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  54. [54]

    M(atrix) theory on an orbifold and twisted membrane,

    N. Kim and S.-J. Rey, “M(atrix) theory on an orbifold and twisted membrane,”Nucl. Phys. B504(1997) 189–213,arXiv:hep-th/9701139

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  55. [55]

    Heterotic strings from matrices,

    T. Banks and L. Motl, “Heterotic strings from matrices,”JHEP12(1997) 004, arXiv:hep-th/9703218

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  56. [56]

    Zero and one-dimensional probes with N=8 supersymmetry,

    T. Banks, N. Seiberg, and E. Silverstein, “Zero and one-dimensional probes with N=8 supersymmetry,”Phys. Lett. B401(1997) 30–37,arXiv:hep-th/9703052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  57. [57]

    Heterotic matrix string theory,

    D. A. Lowe, “Heterotic matrix string theory,”Phys. Lett. B403(1997) 243–249, arXiv:hep-th/9704041

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  58. [58]

    Matrix theory and heterotic strings on tori,

    P. Horava, “Matrix theory and heterotic strings on tori,”Nucl. Phys. B505(1997) 84–108,arXiv:hep-th/9705055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  59. [59]

    The Moduli space and M(atrix) theory of 9d N=1 backgrounds of M/string theory,

    O. Aharony, Z. Komargodski, and A. Patir, “The Moduli space and M(atrix) theory of 9d N=1 backgrounds of M/string theory,”JHEP05(2007) 073, arXiv:hep-th/0702195

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    Exotic Branes and Symmetries of String Theory,

    A. Sen, “Exotic Branes and Symmetries of String Theory,”arXiv:2512.19068 [hep-th]. 17

    arXiv