Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

This paper claims that, at large intermediate Liouville momenta, the five-point and general n-point Virasoro conformal block in the comb channel is asymptotically equal to an explicit product of powers of (16q)^P^2, an exponential in P time

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 05:50 UTC pith:VTUW4SYL

load-bearing objection Genuinely new WKB/elliptic asymptotics for multipoint Virasoro blocks, with one explicitly admitted unproven step (b^{-2}->Q^2) that the checks do not pin down; worth refereeing, but the conditional verdict is right. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.08194 v2 pith:VTUW4SYL submitted 2026-03-09 hep-th math-phmath.MP

WKB-asymptotics for multipoint Virasoro conformal blocks and applications

Aleksandr Artemev , Dmitry Khromov This is my paper
classification hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords conformal blocksVirasoro symmetryWKB asymptoticselliptic recursionmultipoint blocksmoduli-space integralsminimal string theorytheta functions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to describe multipoint Virasoro conformal blocks on the sphere when the intermediate (internal) operator dimensions become very large. In the comb channel (a fixed sequential OPE pairing), it claims an explicit asymptotic form: apart from corrections of order 1/P, the five-point block equals a product of powers of (16q)^P^2, an exponential e^{4iPδP(u−ilog2)}, theta functions, and coordinate prefactors, with a generalization to n points. The derivation runs through a semiclassical WKB expansion of the auxiliary second-order differential equation that follows from a degenerate-field null vector; the monodromy conditions reduce, when δP/P is small, to elliptic integrals, and the final expression is obtained by a b↔1/b symmetric replacement in the exponents. A sympathetic reader would care because the asymptotic turns a complicated power series into elliptic functions, and because dividing by it yields a recurrence ('elliptic recursion') that computes arbitrary multipoint blocks quickly enough for numerical moduli-space integrals in string theory.

Core claim

For the five-point comb-channel block with intermediate Liouville momenta P and P+δP, the claim is the asymptotic equivalence F = f^{(b)}(1+O(1/P)), where f^{(b)} is the explicit expression (2.19): (16q)^{P²} e^{4iPδP(u−ilog2)} times coordinate powers x, 1−x, y(1−y)(y−x), times theta functions Θ3(u|q)^{-4δP²} θ3(q)^{...}, with all exponents built from Q²=(b+1/b)² and external dimensions. When δP is of order 1/P (fixed dimension difference), the δP² terms are dropped, yielding an 'elliptic block' H that tends to 1 at large internal dimensions. The n-point version (3.14) replaces the single u by a sum over k of PδP_k(u_k−ilog2) and adds a theta product over k. The paper then derives a recursio

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the WKB (semiclassical) solution of the second-order ODE satisfied by a correlator with one degenerate-field insertion. At large internal momenta the accessory parameters are large, so the two independent WKB wavefunctions have phase integrals on a hyperelliptic curve w² = z(1−z)(x−z)(y−z)(v−z); the monodromy conditions set these period integrals to the internal momenta. In the regime δP≪P the curve degenerates to a torus, and all period integrals become elliptic integrals expressed through K(x), E(x), Π(y,x), leading to the elliptic modulus q and the coordinate u. The final step is the rule b^{-2} → Q² in the exponents, promoted from the classical to the quantum blo

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on promoting the classical expression to the quantum one by replacing 1/b² with (b+1/b)² in the exponents; the authors state that they cannot rigorously justify this replacement and rely on symmetry, coordinate limits, and agreement with special exact cases.

What would settle it

Evaluate the ratio F/f^{(b)} for a five-point block with generic external momenta at large P and small but nonzero δP/P, using an independent high-order expansion in the cross-ratios; the claim predicts the ratio tends to 1 with no term of order 1/P. A nonzero order-1/P coefficient, or a limit different from 1 at generic parameters, would falsify the exact asymptotic and hence the input to the elliptic recursion.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any five-point block, in the limit of large internal dimensions with fixed dimension difference, is captured up to order 1/P by the explicit elliptic function (2.19)/(5.3), giving a rapidly convergent description instead of a long power series.
  • The elliptic recursion (5.11) computes the five-point block to high precision in a few orders, as demonstrated by analytic checks against exact degenerate cases and by numerical checks for random parameters and crossing-symmetry relations.
  • The n-point generalization (5.18) provides the same recursive description for spherical comb-channel blocks with arbitrarily many external fields.
  • These tools make practical the numerical evaluation of higher-dimensional moduli-space integrals that arise in minimal string theory; the paper demonstrates this on a five-point amplitude involving a ground-ring operator.
  • The geometric identity connecting the asymptotic exponent to the period matrix of the degenerate WKB hyperelliptic curve explains why elliptic functions, not power series in x and y, are the natural variables at large internal dimensions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the b^{-2} → Q² replacement is valid, the same asymptotic structure should appear in any channel where the WKB curve degenerates to a torus, including non-comb channels starting at six points; the paper leaves this as a conjecture.
  • A direct independent test would be to compute the next correction in 1/P for generic external momenta from high-order series and verify that the ratio F/f is consistent with 1; the checks in the paper use special cases and low orders, so this remains open.
  • The period-matrix interpretation suggests that the large-P limit of the crossing matrix relating different OPE channels should act as a Fourier transform, linking these elliptic blocks to modular transformations; the authors mention this as a future direction.
  • If the recursion is as convergent as the numerical examples suggest, it could be used to prove analytic properties (absence of certain discontinuities) of higher-point string amplitudes, analogous to the four-point argument, but this is not established in the paper.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies multipoint Virasoro conformal blocks on the sphere in the comb channel and proposes an asymptotic formula for them when the intermediate Liouville momenta are large. The authors use the classical BPZ equation and WKB methods to compute the leading and some subleading orders of the accessory parameters; after exponentiating, they replace the classical factor b^-2 by Q^2=(b+b^-1)^2, obtaining the closed-form expression f^(b) in Eq. (2.19) (and its n-point generalization (3.14)). They then use this f^(b) to define an elliptic recursion for multipoint blocks (5.11), (5.18), and apply it to compute parts of a minimal-string ground-ring amplitude. The central claim is that F = f^(b)(1+O(1/P)), with the O(1/P) error uniform enough to control the limit used in the recursion.

Significance. If the main asymptotic is correct, this is a substantial and useful contribution: it provides a practical elliptic-variable representation for multipoint Virasoro blocks at large internal dimensions, generalizing Zamolodchikov's 4-point asymptotics and enabling fast numerical evaluation of higher-point string amplitudes. The paper is technically rich and includes several nontrivial checks: exact degenerate-field cases (2.29), AGT series comparisons (2.35)-(2.36), stable numerical convergence of the recursion (Section 5.1.3), crossing-symmetry tests (Table 1), and a geometric interpretation via the period matrix of a degenerate hyperelliptic curve (Section 4). However, the central asymptotic rests on an explicitly admitted, unproved ansatz for the quantum completion, and the provided checks do not generically probe the order at which that ansatz operates. The significance would be high if the gap were closed, but in its current form the main theorem is not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2, bullet 2; Eqs. (2.19), (5.4)] The central claim (2.18)-(2.19) is that the conformal block is, at large P, exactly equal to f^(b) up to corrections O(1/P). This requires all O(1) terms in the exponent of f^(b) to be exact. However, in constructing f^(b) the authors replace the classical factor b^-2 by Q^2=(b+b^-1)^2, and they explicitly state that they cannot argue rigorously why quantum corrections of order 1 and b^2 should take this form. This replacement changes the exponent at O(1) and O(b^2), precisely the order needed for the limit (5.4) to give H to 1. If the correct completion is any other b-to-1/b symmetric function with the same b^-2 leading behavior, then F/f^(b) would tend to a non-universal function of x,y,b, invalidating the elliptic recursion and all applications built on it. Since this is an admitted belief rather than a derivation, the main theorem is not proven. This issue is load-bearing and affects
  2. [Sections 2.3.2, 2.3.3, 5.1.3] The checks presented in Section 2.3 do not fix the O(1) exponent of f^(b) for generic external momenta and generic b. The coordinate asymptotics (2.23)-(2.24) fix only the small-x,y power behavior; the exact degenerate case (2.29) is a codimension-one slice P1=P2=P4=P5=ib/4; the AGT comparison (2.35)-(2.36) is limited to order y^3,(x/y)^3 and to the P to infinity limit of the coefficients. None of these tests distinguishes the Q^2 completion from, say, Q^2 + c b^2(1-b^2) for a nonzero constant c. Consequently the numerical agreement in Section 5.1.3, while encouraging, does not provide independent evidence for the O(1) exponent. The authors should either derive the O(1) terms from a systematic expansion or present a precise conjecture with explicit generic numerical tests at finite b and generic external momenta.
  3. [Section 5.1.1; Eq. (5.3)] The limit used to define the elliptic recursion (5.4) is the limit of H being 1 for fixed P_i1^2 - P_i2^2. However, the derivation of the asymptotic (2.18)-(2.19) is performed for fixed momentum difference delta-P, with delta-P/P small. The transition to fixed dimension difference requires delta-P ~ 1/P, and the authors simply drop the delta-P^2 terms in f_delta (5.3). While those terms are subleading in the exponent, the passage from the delta-P-fixed asymptotic to the delta-Delta-fixed limit is not rigorously justified. This is a secondary but nontrivial gap: the O(1) terms in the exponent of f_delta are exactly the ones that must survive in the limit, and their derivation is not independent of the unproved Q^2 ansatz.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (5.3)] The exponent of theta_3(q) in (5.3) appears to contain 2 Delta_3 twice: '3Q^2 - 2(2Delta_1+2Delta_2+2Delta_3+2Delta_4+Delta_3)' likely should involve Delta_5 (as in (2.19)) rather than a repeated Delta_3. Please check the formula.
  2. [Eqs. (3.5), (3.7), (4.1), (5.16), Figure 2] Several equations and figure captions contain garbled characters (e.g., 'proportional to' symbols followed by strings of boxed characters) that appear to be corrupted symbols for '...' or 'much less than'. These should be repaired for the final version.
  3. [Throughout] The notation is sometimes inconsistent: the same symbol q is used for the elliptic variable and for the AGT expansion order; eq. (2.36) uses 'y * x/y' and 'y^2 * y/x' without clear grouping; and the text mixes 'e^' and 'exp'. A careful copyedit would improve readability.
  4. [Section 2.2, bullet 2] The unproved b^-2 to Q^2 replacement is a central assumption. I recommend stating it as a numbered Conjecture (or Assumption Q^2 completion) with a precise statement of the claimed asymptotic error term, rather than embedding it in a bullet of Comments. This would make the logical status of the paper clearer for readers.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The b^{-2}→Q^2 completion in f^(b) is chosen to match the same exact special cases that are later reported as checks, making that agreement by construction.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [§2.2 (second bullet) and §2.3.2 (eq. (2.29))]
    "“Using our procedure we can not argue rigorously why “quantum” corrections of order 1 and b^2 should take this form. However, we believe that such replacement gives an exact asymptotic for quantum block for a few reasons: … makes this formula agree with known exact answers in special cases. This will be discussed in the next subsection.” … “in this case our asymptotic formula for the conformal block is exact: F^(b)(ib/4,ib/4,P_{1,2},ib/4,ib/4;P±i/2b,P|x,y)=f^(b)(ib/4,ib/4,P_{1,2},ib/4,ib/4;P±i/2b,P|x,y).”"

    The Q^2 replacement, which fixes the O(1) part of the exponent in f^(b), is explicitly chosen to make the formula agree with “known exact answers in special cases.” Those same special cases are then presented in §2.3.2 as checks that f is exact. Thus the special-case agreement is by construction, not an independent verification. Since the Q^2 completion changes the exponent at O(1), inside the claimed O(1/P) remainder, this circularity affects the central asymptotic, even though the WKB leading terms, coordinate limits, and low-order AGT comparisons provide independent partial support.

full rationale

Most of the paper is self-contained: the accessory parameters c_x, c_y are solved from monodromy conditions (2.5), (2.10) rather than fitted to block data; the elliptic-recursion residues come from external references [17,24]; the AGT comparison and crossing-symmetry checks are independent. However, one element is genuinely circular: the b^{-2}→Q^2 completion in the exponent of f^(b) is admitted to be an unjustified belief and is chosen for reasons that include agreement with known exact answers in special cases. The same special cases are then reported in §2.3.2 as checks (eq. (2.29)), so that agreement is by construction, not a test. Because the replacement affects the exponent at O(1), this touches the central O(1/P) asymptotic, although not the whole derivation. The score is therefore moderate rather than zero.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper states all of its standard inputs (BPZ equation, semiclassical exponentiation, WKB monodromy correspondence, known residue coefficients from [17,24], meromorphic structure in Δ). The genuinely ad hoc element is the b^(-2)→Q^2 replacement, which is not derived; the order-δP^2 terms in (3.16) are added by hand to fix the coordinate limit; and the absence of Stokes phenomena for complex parameters is assumed without proof. No new entities are postulated — the degenerate field V_{2,1}, the classical BPZ equation, the WKB curve (2.11), and the ground-ring operator O_{2,1} are all taken from prior literature ([1], [23], [25], [26]).

free parameters (2)
  • order-δP_k² terms in f^b_Δ (3.16) = chosen to reproduce the coordinate limit (3.17)
    Added by hand, stated by the authors at §3: 'Here we added the necessary terms of order δP_k² to obtain the correct limit x,y_1,...→0'. Not an output of the WKB computation.
  • overall x,y-independent normalization of f^(b) = standard conformal-block normalization (leading coefficient 1)
    Cannot be obtained from integrating accessory parameters (§2.2, bullet 1); fixed by matching the coordinate asymptotics (2.24).
axioms (7)
  • standard math BPZ equation and singular-vector decoupling for V_{2,1}
    Eq. (2.1); standard result from [1], used to set up the classical monodromy problem.
  • domain assumption Semiclassical factorization F ~ exp(b^(-2) F_cl) with finite bP in the b→0 limit
    §2.1; standard Liouville-CFT saddle-point assumption that conformal blocks exponentiate in 1/c.
  • domain assumption WKB solutions correctly reproduce the monodromy of the exact solutions (no relevant Stokes phenomena)
    Footnote 1 (p. 6): the authors state that Stokes phenomena are ignored and 'we expect that they should not affect the asymptotic in the general case as well'. Not proven; load-bearing for the monodromy equations (2.10).
  • ad hoc to paper The b^(-2) → Q^2 replacement in the exponents is the exact quantum completion
    §2.2 bullet 2: 'we can not argue rigorously why quantum corrections of order 1 and b^2 should take this form. However, we believe...' — justified only by b↔b^(-1) symmetry, coordinate limits, and agreement with known exact cases.
  • domain assumption Residue coefficients R_{m,n} of the 4-point recursion carry over to multipoint blocks
    §5.1.1: 'these coefficients for an n-point block are the same as for the 4-point block, except for the inserted momenta. We use the results of [17, 24].' Not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption H as a function of Δ is meromorphic with only the degenerate pole series and no essential singularity at infinity
    §5.1.1: standard analytic structure of Virasoro blocks in Δ, following [24]; the Liouville-theorem argument for the recursion depends on it.
  • domain assumption The fixed-δΔ limit (dropping δP^2 terms) is the correct large-P regime for the recursion
    §5.1.1: the authors drop δP^2 terms because they are not unique/analytic functions of internal dimensions; the recursion is built in this modified limit. Checked numerically but not proven.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29209 in / 20485 out tokens · 201174 ms · 2026-08-04T05:50:34.575810+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study multipoint Virasoro conformal blocks on the sphere in the comb channel. We arrive at the asymptotic expression for these blocks at large intermediate dimensions, applying WKB method for "classical BPZ equation", which is used to study (classical) Virasoro blocks via monodromy method. Several applications of this asymptotic are discussed, such as the possibility to generalize Zamolodchikov's elliptic recursion and numerical evaluation of amplitudes in minimal string theory. Our expressions pass nontrivial checks, such as agreement with known exact expressions for 5-point blocks in special cases and the usual series expansion of Virasoro blocks computed using AGT correspondence.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exponentiation of higher-point and higher-genus Virasoro conformal blocks in the semiclassical limit

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Extends the exponentiation of Virasoro conformal blocks in the semiclassical limit to higher-point and higher-genus cases at the level of formal power series using an extended oscillator method.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 17 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B241(1984) 333–380

    1984

  2. [2]

    Rosenhaus,Multipoint Conformal Blocks in the Comb Channel,JHEP02(2019) 142, [1810.03244]

    V. Rosenhaus,Multipoint Conformal Blocks in the Comb Channel,JHEP02(2019) 142, [1810.03244]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    K. B. Alkalaev and V. A. Belavin,From global to heavy-light: 5-point conformal blocks,JHEP03 (2016) 184, [1512.07627]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Khromov and A

    D. Khromov and A. Litvinov,On correlation numbersV 0,4 andV 1,1 in Virasoro Minimal String Theory,2509.25960

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Belavin,Torus Amplitudes in Minimal Liouville Gravity and Matrix Models,Phys

    V. Belavin,Torus Amplitudes in Minimal Liouville Gravity and Matrix Models,Phys. Lett. B698 (2011) 86–90, [1010.5508]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Aleshkin and V

    K. Aleshkin and V. Belavin,On the construction of the correlation numbers in Minimal Liouville Gravity,JHEP11(2016) 142, [1610.01558]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    V. A. Rodriguez, M. Usatyuk and Z.-Y. Wang,ADE Minimal Strings and Multi-Matrix Duals, 2511.21851

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,The Virasoro Minimal String, SciPost Phys.16(2024) 057, [2309.10846]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,The complex Liouville string: the worldsheet,2409.18759

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Balthazar, V

    B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodriguez and X. Yin,Thec= 1 string theory S-matrix revisited,JHEP04 (2019) 145, [1705.07151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa,Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010) 167–197, [0906.3219]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    V. A. Alba, V. A. Fateev, A. V. Litvinov and G. M. Tarnopolskiy,On combinatorial expansion of the conformal blocks arising from AGT conjecture,Lett. Math. Phys.98(2011) 33–64, [1012.1312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  13. [13]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion representation of conformal block,Theoretical and Mathematical Physics73(1987) 1088–1093

    1987

  14. [14]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov,Looking for a bulk point,JHEP01(2017) 013, [1509.03612]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Hadasz, Z

    L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski and P. Suchanek,Elliptic recurrence representation of the N = 1 Neveu-Schwarz blocks,Nucl. Phys. B798(2008) 363–378, [0711.1619]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    Hadasz, Z

    L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski and P. Suchanek,Recursive representation of the torus 1-point conformal block,JHEP01(2010) 063, [0911.2353]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    M. Cho, S. Collier and X. Yin,Recursive representations of arbitrary virasoro conformal blocks, Journal of High Energy Physics2019(Apr, 2019) 18

    2019

  18. [18]

    Iwaki,Les Houches Lectures on Exact WKB Analysis and Painlev´ e Equations,2512.17599

    K. Iwaki,Les Houches Lectures on Exact WKB Analysis and Painlev´ e Equations,2512.17599

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    T. Koike,On the exact wkb analysis of second order linear ordinary differential equations with simple poles,Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences36(04, 2000)

    2000

  20. [20]

    V. A. Fateev, A. V. Litvinov, A. Neveu and E. Onofri,A differential equation for a four-point correlation function in liouville field theory and elliptic four-point conformal blocks,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42(jul, 2009) 304011

    2009

  21. [21]

    Enolski and P

    V. Enolski and P. Richter,Periods of hyperelliptic integrals expressed in terms ofθ-constants by means of thomae formulae,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences366(06, 2007) 1005–1024, [https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsta/article-pdf/366/1867/1005/341480/rsta.2007.2059.pdf]. – 31 –

    arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Thomae,Beitrag zur bestimmung von

    J. Thomae,Beitrag zur bestimmung von ... (0, 0, ...0) durch die klassenmoduln algebraischer functionen.,Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik71(1869) 201–222

  23. [23]

    Zamolodchikov,Conformal scalar field on the hyperelliptic curve and critical ashkin-teller multipoint correlation functions,Nuclear Physics B285(1987) 481–503

    A. Zamolodchikov,Conformal scalar field on the hyperelliptic curve and critical ashkin-teller multipoint correlation functions,Nuclear Physics B285(1987) 481–503

    1987

  24. [24]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Conformal symmetry in two dimensions: an explicit recurrence formula for the conformal partial wave amplitude,Commun. Math. Phys.96(1984) 419–422

    1984

  25. [25]

    A. A. Belavin and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Integrals over moduli spaces, ground ring, and four-point function in minimal Liouville gravity,Theor. Math. Phys.147(2006) 729–754

    2006

  26. [26]

    Imbimbo, S

    C. Imbimbo, S. Mahapatra and S. Mukhi,Construction of physical states of non-trivial ghost number inc<1string theory,Nuclear Physics B375(1992) 399–420

    1992

  27. [27]

    Polchinski,String Theory, vol

    J. Polchinski,String Theory, vol. 1 ofCambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 1998, 10.1017/CBO9780511816079

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816079 1998

  28. [28]

    Sen and B

    A. Sen and B. Zwiebach,String Field Theory: A Review,2405.19421

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Artemev,x-y swap for a (2, 2p+1) minimal string,Phys

    A. Artemev,x-y swap for a (2, 2p+1) minimal string,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 046019, [2506.09222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Ribault and R

    S. Ribault and R. Santachiara,Liouville theory with a central charge less than one,JHEP08 (2015) 109, [1503.02067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Nemkov,S-duality as Fourier transform for arbitraryϵ 1,ϵ 2,J

    N. Nemkov,S-duality as Fourier transform for arbitraryϵ 1,ϵ 2,J. Phys. A47(2014) 105401, [1307.0773]. – 32 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014