pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.09645 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-10 · 🪐 quant-ph · cs.LG

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Noise Models Impacts and Mitigation Strategies in Photonic Quantum Machine Learning

A.M.A.S.D. Alagiyawanna , Asoka Karunananda
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cs.LG
keywords photonic quantum machine learningnoise modelsmitigation strategiesvariational quantum circuitsquantum neural networksquantum support vector machinesphotonic quantum computingtraining stability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Noise remains the primary barrier to reliable and scalable photonic quantum machine learning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review establishes that noise in photonic hardware continues to degrade PQML systems by reducing learning accuracy, destabilizing training, and slowing convergence. It maps the main noise sources in photonic architectures and shows that their effects vary by algorithm, hitting variational circuits, quantum neural networks, and support vector machines differently. The analysis covers how traditional and newer characterization methods reveal these impacts, then surveys mitigation techniques that have allowed limited real-world operation. If the review's synthesis holds, noise handling must become a core design element rather than an afterthought for PQML to move beyond small demonstrations.

Core claim

Noise sources inherent to photonic quantum systems degrade the performance of implemented quantum machine learning algorithms in algorithm-specific ways, lowering accuracy, increasing training instability, and delaying convergence, while existing mitigation strategies offer partial relief but do not yet enable broad scalability.

What carries the argument

Algorithm-specific noise models in photonic quantum systems that quantify degradation in learning accuracy, training stability, and convergence rates.

If this is right

  • Different PQML algorithms require tailored noise mitigation rather than one-size-fits-all corrections.
  • Training stability in quantum neural networks drops faster under photon-loss noise than under phase noise.
  • Mitigation overhead must be budgeted into circuit depth to preserve any speed advantage of photonic implementations.
  • Real-world PQML deployments remain limited to small problem sizes until noise levels fall further.
  • Characterization techniques that separate noise types become essential for selecting the right mitigation for each algorithm.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Photonic PQML platforms may need co-designed classical feedback loops that adapt to measured noise in real time.
  • Hybrid systems that offload noise-sensitive subroutines to classical processors could extend usable problem sizes sooner than pure quantum versions.
  • Standardized noise benchmarks for PQML algorithms would let future hardware improvements be compared directly against the reviewed baselines.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes the collected literature accurately and completely describes all relevant noise sources and mitigation methods in the current state of PQML research.

What would settle it

A controlled photonic experiment that runs a PQML algorithm at scale with realistic hardware noise yet shows no measurable drop in accuracy or convergence speed compared with ideal simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.09645 by A.M.A.S.D. Alagiyawanna, Asoka Karunananda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Timeline of major advancements in quantum machine learning. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic overview of a photonic quantum computing system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic illustration of a single photon interacting with a beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic illustration of key components in hybrid quantum sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic representation of a variational quantum circuit show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic illustration of machine learning-based quantum error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: System-level schematic of an integrated programmable photonic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Photonic Quantum Machine Learning (PQML) is an emerging method to implement scalable, energy-efficient quantum information processing by combining photonic quantum computing technologies with machine learning techniques. The features of photonic technologies offer several benefits: room-temperature operation; fast (low delay) processing of signals; and the possibility of representing computations in high-dimensional (Hilbert) spaces. This makes photonic technologies a good candidate for the near-term development of quantum devices. However, noise is still a major limiting factor for the performance, reliability, and scalability of PQML implementations. This review provides a detailed and systematic analysis of the sources of noise that will affect PQML implementations. We will present an overview of the principal photonic quantum computer designs and summarize the many different types of quantum machine learning algorithms that have been successfully implemented using photonic quantum computer architectures such as variational quantum circuits, quantum neural networks, and quantum support vector machines. We identify and categorize the primary sources of noise within photonic quantum systems and how these sources of noise behave algorithm-specifically with respect to degrading the accuracy of learning, unstable training, and slower convergence than expected. Additionally, we review traditional and advanced techniques for characterizing noise and provide an extensive survey of strategies for mitigating the effects of noise on learning performance. Finally, we discuss recent advances that demonstrate PQML's capability to operate in real-world settings with realistic noise conditions and future obstacles that will challenge the use of PQML as an effective quantum processing platform.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review paper that surveys photonic quantum machine learning (PQML) implementations, focusing on noise sources in photonic quantum systems, their algorithm-specific impacts on learning accuracy, training stability, and convergence for methods such as variational quantum circuits, quantum neural networks, and quantum support vector machines, along with noise characterization techniques, mitigation strategies, real-world demonstrations, and future challenges.

Significance. If the literature synthesis is comprehensive and balanced, the review would serve as a useful reference for the PQML community by consolidating knowledge on noise as a limiting factor and cataloging mitigation approaches. The emphasis on algorithm-specific noise effects and inclusion of real-world photonic demonstrations adds practical value, though the paper's contribution is primarily organizational rather than introducing new theoretical or experimental results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and noise impacts section] The central claim that noise produces algorithm-specific degradation (accuracy, stability, convergence) is asserted in the abstract and introduction but lacks a dedicated comparative table or quantitative summary across the surveyed algorithms in the main body; without this, the specificity of the claim rests entirely on the cited works and is difficult to assess for completeness.
  2. [Noise sources categorization] The categorization of noise sources is described as systematic, yet the manuscript does not state explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria for the reviewed literature or address potential publication bias in the photonic QML noise studies cited; this weakens the claim of a 'detailed and systematic analysis' for a rapidly evolving field.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Overview of photonic designs] Notation for photonic components (e.g., beam splitters, phase shifters) should be standardized in a single table or glossary to aid readability across sections on architectures and noise models.
  2. [Mitigation strategies survey] Several citations in the mitigation strategies section appear to be from 2022 or earlier; a brief note on the cutoff date of the literature search would clarify the review's currency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our review manuscript. We have addressed both major comments by adding new content to strengthen the presentation of our claims and the systematic nature of the analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction and noise impacts section] The central claim that noise produces algorithm-specific degradation (accuracy, stability, convergence) is asserted in the abstract and introduction but lacks a dedicated comparative table or quantitative summary across the surveyed algorithms in the main body; without this, the specificity of the claim rests entirely on the cited works and is difficult to assess for completeness.

    Authors: We agree that a dedicated comparative table would improve readability and allow readers to more readily evaluate the algorithm-specific effects. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a new Table 3 in Section 4 (Noise Impacts on PQML Algorithms) that compiles quantitative and qualitative findings from the surveyed literature. The table lists, for each algorithm class (variational quantum circuits, quantum neural networks, quantum support vector machines), the reported degradation in accuracy, training stability, and convergence speed under typical photonic noise models, together with the corresponding references. Where numerical values are available they are included; otherwise the dominant qualitative trend is noted. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Noise sources categorization] The categorization of noise sources is described as systematic, yet the manuscript does not state explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria for the reviewed literature or address potential publication bias in the photonic QML noise studies cited; this weakens the claim of a 'detailed and systematic analysis' for a rapidly evolving field.

    Authors: We accept this observation. The revised manuscript now contains a new subsection (Section 2.1, Literature Selection and Scope) that explicitly states the inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed works published 2018–2024 that report photonic hardware implementations or simulations of QML algorithms with noise characterization) and exclusion criteria (purely theoretical proposals without photonic mapping, non-peer-reviewed preprints, and studies focused exclusively on superconducting or trapped-ion platforms). We also add a short paragraph acknowledging publication bias in an emerging field and noting that our synthesis draws from both positive and negative experimental outcomes reported in the literature to the extent they are available. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in review synthesis

full rationale

This is a review paper aggregating and categorizing existing literature on noise sources, impacts, and mitigation in photonic quantum machine learning. No original derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or self-referential definitions appear in the provided text or abstract. Central claims rest on synthesis of external cited works rather than any load-bearing step that reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes. The structure (overview of designs, algorithms, noise categorization, mitigation survey) introduces no self-definitional loops or renamed known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters, axioms beyond standard domain assumptions, or invented entities are introduced; the paper reviews existing photonic quantum concepts and noise models from the literature.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Photonic technologies enable room-temperature operation, fast signal processing, and high-dimensional Hilbert space representations.
    Stated directly in the abstract as core benefits motivating PQML.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5564 in / 1155 out tokens · 55930 ms · 2026-05-15T13:09:39.290931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions.SN computer science, 2(3):160, 2021

    Iqbal H Sarker. Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions.SN computer science, 2(3):160, 2021. 21

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Enhancing small dataset classification using projected quantum kernels with convolutional neural networks

    AMASD Alagiyawanna, Asoka Karunananda, A Mahasinghe, and Thushari Silva. Enhancing small dataset classification using projected quantum kernels with convolutional neural networks. In2024 8th SLAAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SLAAI- ICAI), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Quantum theory, the church–turing principle and the universal quantum computer.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don

    David Deutsch. Quantum theory, the church–turing principle and the universal quantum computer.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 400(1818):97–117, 1985

    work page 1985

  4. [4]

    Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete loga- rithms and factoring

    Peter W Shor. Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete loga- rithms and factoring. InProceedings 35th annual symposium on foun- dations of computer science, pages 124–134. Ieee, 1994

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    Quantum entanglement.Reviews of modern physics, 81(2):865–942, 2009

    Ryszard Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, Micha l Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki. Quantum entanglement.Reviews of modern physics, 81(2):865–942, 2009

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Quantum neural computing.Advances in imaging and electron physics, 94:259–313, 1995

    Subhash C Kak. Quantum neural computing.Advances in imaging and electron physics, 94:259–313, 1995

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    Opportunities and lim- itations of explaining quantum machine learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14753, 2024

    Elies Gil-Fuster, Jonas R Naujoks, Gr´ egoire Montavon, Thomas Wie- gand, Wojciech Samek, and Jens Eisert. Opportunities and lim- itations of explaining quantum machine learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14753, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Quan- tum computational advantage using photons.Science, 370(6523):1460– 1463, 2020

    Han-Sen Zhong, Hui Wang, Yu-Hao Deng, Ming-Cheng Chen, Li-Chao Peng, Yi-Han Luo, Jian Qin, Dian Wu, Xing Ding, Yi Hu, et al. Quan- tum computational advantage using photons.Science, 370(6523):1460– 1463, 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Photonic quantum computers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08229, 2024

    Muhammad AbuGhanem. Photonic quantum computers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08229, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum elec- trodynamics.Nature Physics, 16(3):247–256, 2020

    Alexandre Blais, Steven M Girvin, and William D Oliver. Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum elec- trodynamics.Nature Physics, 16(3):247–256, 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Photonic hybrid quan- tum computing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.00534, 2025

    Jaehak Lee, Srikrishna Omkar, Yong Siah Teo, Seok-Hyung Lee, Hyukjoon Kwon, MS Kim, and Hyunseok Jeong. Photonic hybrid quan- tum computing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.00534, 2025. 22

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Sergei Slussarenko and Geoff J. Pryde. Photonic quantum information processing: A concise review.Applied Physics Reviews, 6(4):041303, 10 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Accuracy, noise, and scalability in quantum computa- tion: Strategies for the nisq era and beyond, 2025

    Mehmet Ke¸ ceci. Accuracy, noise, and scalability in quantum computa- tion: Strategies for the nisq era and beyond, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Cryogenic feedforward of a photonic quantum state.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08908, 2024

    Frederik Thiele, Niklas Lamberty, Thomas Hummel, Nina A Lange, Lorenzo M Procopio, Aishi Barua, Sebastian Lengeling, Viktor Quiring, Christof Eigner, Christine Silberhorn, et al. Cryogenic feedforward of a photonic quantum state.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08908, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Blueprint for a scalable photonic fault-tolerant quantum computer.Quantum, 5:392, 2021

    J Eli Bourassa, Rafael N Alexander, Michael Vasmer, Ashlesha Patil, Ilan Tzitrin, Takaya Matsuura, Daiqin Su, Ben Q Baragiola, Saikat Guha, Guillaume Dauphinais, et al. Blueprint for a scalable photonic fault-tolerant quantum computer.Quantum, 5:392, 2021

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Inherent thermal-noise problem in ad- dressing qubits.PRX Quantum, 5(3):030302, 2024

    Slawomir Simbierowicz, Massimo Borrelli, Volodymyr Monarkha, Ville Nuutinen, and Russell E Lake. Inherent thermal-noise problem in ad- dressing qubits.PRX Quantum, 5(3):030302, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Consequences of quantum noise control for the relaxation resonance fre- quency and phase noise in heterogeneous silicon/iii–v lasers.Scientific Reports, 12(1):312, 2022

    Dongwan Kim, Mark Harfouche, Huolei Wang, Christos T Santis, Yaakov Vilenchik, Naresh Satyan, George Rakuljic, and Amnon Yariv. Consequences of quantum noise control for the relaxation resonance fre- quency and phase noise in heterogeneous silicon/iii–v lasers.Scientific Reports, 12(1):312, 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Photonic probabilistic ma- chine learning using quantum vacuum noise.Nature Communications, 15(1):7760, 2024

    Seou Choi, Yannick Salamin, Charles Roques-Carmes, Rumen Dan- govski, Di Luo, Zhuo Chen, Michael Horodynski, Jamison Sloan, Shiekh Zia Uddin, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Photonic probabilistic ma- chine learning using quantum vacuum noise.Nature Communications, 15(1):7760, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    A systematic review on quantum machine learning applications in classification.IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2025

    Ehsan Mohammadisavadkoohi, Niusha Shafiabady, and James Vakil- ian. A systematic review on quantum machine learning applications in classification.IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Us- ing models to improve optimizers for variational quantum algorithms

    Kevin J Sung, Jiahao Yao, Matthew P Harrigan, Nicholas C Rubin, Zhang Jiang, Lin Lin, Ryan Babbush, and Jarrod R McClean. Us- ing models to improve optimizers for variational quantum algorithms. Quantum Science and Technology, 5(4):044008, 2020. 23

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Quan- tum neural networks: Concepts, applications, and challenges

    Yunseok Kwak, Won Joon Yun, Soyi Jung, and Joongheon Kim. Quan- tum neural networks: Concepts, applications, and challenges. In2021 Twelfth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), pages 413–416. IEEE, 2021

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Quantum support vector machine for classification task: A review.Journal of Multiscale Materials Informatics, 1(2):1–8, 2024

    Muhamad Akrom. Quantum support vector machine for classification task: A review.Journal of Multiscale Materials Informatics, 1(2):1–8, 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Quantum information.arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.07712, 2021

    Ryszard Horodecki. Quantum information.arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.07712, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Routing entanglement in the quantum internet.npj Quantum Information, 5(1):25, 2019

    Mihir Pant, Hari Krovi, Don Towsley, Leandros Tassiulas, Liang Jiang, Prithwish Basu, Dirk Englund, and Saikat Guha. Routing entanglement in the quantum internet.npj Quantum Information, 5(1):25, 2019

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing.Nature Reviews Physics, 5(6):326–338, 2023

    Christophe Couteau, Stefanie Barz, Thomas Durt, Thomas Gerrits, Jan Huwer, Robert Prevedel, John Rarity, Andrew Shields, and Gregor Weihs. Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing.Nature Reviews Physics, 5(6):326–338, 2023

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Advance- ments and challenges in underwater wireless optical communication in the marine environment

    Darko Palai´ c, Nikola Lopac, Irena Jurdana, and Damir Brdar. Advance- ments and challenges in underwater wireless optical communication in the marine environment. In2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO), pages 1760–1765. IEEE, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Long-distance entanglement purification for quantum communi- cation.Physical review letters, 126(1):010503, 2021

    Xiao-Min Hu, Cen-Xiao Huang, Yu-Bo Sheng, Lan Zhou, Bi-Heng Liu, Yu Guo, Chao Zhang, Wen-Bo Xing, Yun-Feng Huang, Chuan-Feng Li, et al. Long-distance entanglement purification for quantum communi- cation.Physical review letters, 126(1):010503, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    The power of quantum neural networks

    Amira Abbas, David Sutter, Christa Zoufal, Aur´ elien Lucchi, Alessio Figalli, and Stefan Woerner. The power of quantum neural networks. Nature Computational Science, 1(6):403–409, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Varsaw: Application-tailored measurement error mitigation for variational quan- tum algorithms

    Siddharth Dangwal, Gokul Subramanian Ravi, Poulami Das, Kaitlin N Smith, Jonathan Mark Baker, and Frederic T Chong. Varsaw: Application-tailored measurement error mitigation for variational quan- tum algorithms. InProceedings of the 28th ACM International Confer- ence on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operat- ing Systems, Volume 4, pa...

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes.Nature communications, 9(1):4812, 2018

    Jarrod R McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N Smelyanskiy, Ryan Bab- bush, and Hartmut Neven. Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes.Nature communications, 9(1):4812, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware

    Maria Schuld, Ville Bergholm, Christian Gogolin, Josh Izaac, and Nathan Killoran. Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware. Physical Review A, 99(3):032331, 2019

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits

    Kristan Temme, Sergey Bravyi, and Jay M Gambetta. Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits.arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.02058, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box.Journal of Modern Optics, 44(11-12):2455–2467, 1997

    Isaac L Chuang and Michael A Nielsen. Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box.Journal of Modern Optics, 44(11-12):2455–2467, 1997

    work page 1997

  34. [34]

    Scalable and robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes.Physical review letters, 106(18):180504, 2011

    Easwar Magesan, Jay M Gambetta, and Joseph Emerson. Scalable and robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes.Physical review letters, 106(18):180504, 2011

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Noise spectroscopy through dynamical de- coupling with a superconducting flux qubit.Nature Physics, 7(7):565– 570, 2011

    Jonas Bylander, Simon Gustavsson, Fei Yan, Fumiki Yoshihara, Khalil Harrabi, George Fitch, David G Cory, Yasunobu Nakamura, Jaw-Shen Tsai, and William D Oliver. Noise spectroscopy through dynamical de- coupling with a superconducting flux qubit.Nature Physics, 7(7):565– 570, 2011

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    Neural-network quantum state tomography.Nature physics, 14(5):447–450, 2018

    Giacomo Torlai, Guglielmo Mazzola, Juan Carrasquilla, Matthias Troyer, Roger Melko, and Giuseppe Carleo. Neural-network quantum state tomography.Nature physics, 14(5):447–450, 2018

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Adap- tive povm implementations and measurement error mitigation strate- gies for near-term quantum devices.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07817, 2022

    Adam Glos, Anton Nyk¨ anen, Elsi-Mari Borrelli, Sabrina Maniscalco, Matteo AC Rossi, Zolt´ an Zimbor´ as, and Guillermo Garc´ ıa-P´ erez. Adap- tive povm implementations and measurement error mitigation strate- gies for near-term quantum devices.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07817, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Adaptive quantum state to- mography with active learning.Quantum, 7:1129, 2023

    Hannah Lange, Matjaˇ z Kebriˇ c, Maximilian Buser, Ulrich Schollw¨ ock, Fabian Grusdt, and Annabelle Bohrdt. Adaptive quantum state to- mography with active learning.Quantum, 7:1129, 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation.Physical Review Letters, 95(1):010501, 2005

    Daniel E Browne and Terry Rudolph. Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation.Physical Review Letters, 95(1):010501, 2005. 25

    work page 2005

  40. [40]

    Decoher- ence free subspaces for quantum computation.arXiv preprint quant- ph/9807004, 1998

    Daniel A Lidar, Isaac L Chuang, and K Birgitta Whaley. Decoher- ence free subspaces for quantum computation.arXiv preprint quant- ph/9807004, 1998

    work page arXiv 1998

  41. [41]

    In- vited article: Generation of one-million-mode continuous-variable clus- ter state by unlimited time-domain multiplexing.APL photonics, 1(6), 2016

    Jun-ichi Yoshikawa, Shota Yokoyama, Toshiyuki Kaji, Chanond Sorn- phiphatphong, Yu Shiozawa, Kenzo Makino, and Akira Furusawa. In- vited article: Generation of one-million-mode continuous-variable clus- ter state by unlimited time-domain multiplexing.APL photonics, 1(6), 2016

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip.Nature, 591(7848):54–60, 2021

    Juan M Arrazola, Ville Bergholm, Kamil Br´ adler, Thomas R Bromley, Matt J Collins, Ish Dhand, Alberto Fumagalli, Thomas Gerrits, Andrey Goussev, Lukas G Helt, et al. Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip.Nature, 591(7848):54–60, 2021

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Power monitoring in a feedforward photonic net- work using two output detectors.Nanophotonics, 12(5):985–991, 2023

    Sunil Pai, Carson Valdez, Taewon Park, Maziyar Milanizadeh, Francesco Morichetti, Andrea Melloni, Shanhui Fan, Olav Solgaard, and David AB Miller. Power monitoring in a feedforward photonic net- work using two output detectors.Nanophotonics, 12(5):985–991, 2023

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by hybrid qubits with bosonic cat code and single photons.PRX Quantum, 5(3):030322, 2024

    Jaehak Lee, Nuri Kang, Seok-Hyung Lee, Hyunseok Jeong, Liang Jiang, and Seung-Woo Lee. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by hybrid qubits with bosonic cat code and single photons.PRX Quantum, 5(3):030322, 2024

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Hybrid discrete-and continuous-variable quantum in- formation.Nature Physics, 11(9):713–719, 2015

    Ulrik L Andersen, Jonas S Neergaard-Nielsen, Peter Van Loock, and Akira Furusawa. Hybrid discrete-and continuous-variable quantum in- formation.Nature Physics, 11(9):713–719, 2015. 26

    work page 2015