pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.09867 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: no theorem link

The emerging timescale of young star clusters regulated by cluster stellar mass

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords star clustersdispersal timescalesstellar feedbackembedded clustersstar formationgalaxiesHSTJWST
0
0 comments X

The pith

Massive star clusters disperse their natal gas faster than lower-mass ones.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Observations with the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes of thousands of young clusters across four galaxies show that the time needed to clear surrounding gas depends on cluster mass. More massive clusters clear their birth material on shorter timescales than less massive ones. The result supplies a direct observational test for simulations of star formation and feedback, identifies massive clusters as the main sources of ionizing radiation that escapes into the wider galaxy, and sets an upper limit on the time available for planet formation inside the most massive clusters.

Core claim

We find a strong correlation between dispersal timescale and cluster stellar mass, with massive clusters emerging faster than their lower-mass counterparts. This correlation is derived from the observed fraction of embedded versus exposed clusters at different masses in M51, M83, NGC 628, and NGC 4449.

What carries the argument

The fraction of clusters still embedded in natal gas versus those that have dispersed it, measured as a function of cluster stellar mass, used to infer the mass-dependent dispersal timescale.

If this is right

  • Star-formation simulations must produce faster gas dispersal in higher-mass clusters to match the observed trend.
  • Massive clusters dominate the leakage of ionizing photons from galaxies into the intergalactic medium.
  • Planet-forming disks around stars in massive clusters are exposed to strong ultraviolet radiation and lose further gas accretion earlier than disks in lower-mass clusters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mass dependence suggests that stellar feedback becomes more efficient per unit mass as cluster mass increases.
  • The result implies that galaxies with steeper cluster mass functions will have slower average cluster emergence and lower overall feedback efficiency.
  • Future observations of clusters in more distant galaxies can test whether the same mass-dependent timescale holds at higher redshifts.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed fraction of embedded versus exposed clusters at a given mass directly traces the dispersal timescale without large mass-dependent selection biases in detection or age assignment.

What would settle it

A large, complete sample of clusters with independently measured ages and embedding status showing no systematic trend of dispersal time with mass, or clear evidence that detection completeness or age errors vary strongly with mass.

read the original abstract

Quantifying the timescales of star cluster emergence from their natal clouds remains one of the main challenges in understanding the star formation process. These timescales are fundamental measurements of the star formation cycle within galaxies, yet are difficult to constrain due to the complex interplay between stellar feedback and star formation across multiple physical scales. Here we present Hubble Space Telescope and James Webb Space Telescope observations of thousands of young star clusters in four nearby galaxies (M51, M83, NGC 628 and NGC 4449). A substantial fraction of these clusters are still embedded within their natal gas and remain invisible at optical wavelengths. We constrain their emergence process by measuring the timescales required to disperse the surrounding material. We find a strong correlation between dispersal timescale and cluster stellar mass, with massive clusters emerging faster than their lower-mass counterparts. This is a critical constraint on star formation and stellar feedback simulations, which struggle to fully reproduce star clusters formation and emergence. Our results emphasize the central role of massive clusters in driving the escape of ionizing radiation into the galactic medium. Finally, they impose time limitations for planet formation in massive cluster environments where disks get exposed to ultraviolet irradiation and further gas infall is halted.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses HST and JWST observations of thousands of young star clusters across four nearby galaxies (M51, M83, NGC 628, NGC 4449) to identify a large embedded population invisible at optical wavelengths. It derives dispersal timescales from the embedded-to-exposed fraction at fixed mass and reports a strong correlation: more massive clusters disperse their natal material faster. The result is framed as a direct constraint on stellar feedback models and as imposing time limits on planet formation in massive clusters.

Significance. If the correlation survives detailed bias controls, it supplies a key observational benchmark for the mass dependence of cluster emergence, directly informing simulations of feedback-driven gas expulsion and the escape of ionizing photons. The emphasis on massive clusters as drivers of galactic feedback and the planet-formation implication are both timely.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3–4] The mapping from observed embedded fraction to physical dispersal timescale (implicit in the abstract and §3–4) assumes mass-independent completeness and age assignment once JWST data are included. No quantitative test of this assumption—e.g., recovery fractions versus mass in mock catalogs or comparison of optical versus mid-IR selection functions—is presented, leaving the central correlation vulnerable to selection artifacts.
  2. [§3] Error bars, sample completeness limits, and the precise definition of “embedded” versus “exposed” (including any mass-dependent age systematics) are not reported. Without these, the statistical significance of the reported mass–timescale trend cannot be evaluated.
  3. [Results section] Table or figure showing the binned embedded fractions versus mass (presumably the basis for the correlation) is not accompanied by a control for galaxy-to-galaxy variations or for the different spatial resolutions of HST and JWST, both of which could introduce mass-dependent biases.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states “thousands of young star clusters” without giving the final analyzed sample size after quality cuts.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for cluster mass (M_*) and dispersal time (t_disp) should be defined at first use and used consistently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and valuable comments on our manuscript. The suggestions have prompted us to strengthen the analysis by adding quantitative tests for biases and improved statistical reporting. We believe these revisions address the concerns and enhance the robustness of our conclusions regarding the mass-dependent dispersal timescales.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3–4] The mapping from observed embedded fraction to physical dispersal timescale (implicit in the abstract and §3–4) assumes mass-independent completeness and age assignment once JWST data are included. No quantitative test of this assumption—e.g., recovery fractions versus mass in mock catalogs or comparison of optical versus mid-IR selection functions—is presented, leaving the central correlation vulnerable to selection artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative tests of completeness and selection functions are important to validate the mass dependence. In the original manuscript, we relied on the high sensitivity of JWST to minimize mass-dependent biases in detecting embedded clusters, but we acknowledge the need for explicit verification. We have now generated mock catalogs to test recovery fractions as a function of mass and will include these results in a new subsection of §3. Additionally, we compare the optical and mid-IR selection functions using the available data. These additions confirm that the correlation is not driven by selection artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] Error bars, sample completeness limits, and the precise definition of “embedded” versus “exposed” (including any mass-dependent age systematics) are not reported. Without these, the statistical significance of the reported mass–timescale trend cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We apologize for the omission. The precise definitions of embedded and exposed clusters are based on the presence or absence of mid-IR emission from dust and gas, as detailed in §2. We will add a dedicated paragraph in §3 clarifying these definitions, including discussion of potential mass-dependent age systematics. Error bars on the embedded fractions will be included in the revised figures, calculated using binomial statistics. Sample completeness limits as a function of mass and wavelength will also be reported, derived from the detection thresholds in each galaxy. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results section] Table or figure showing the binned embedded fractions versus mass (presumably the basis for the correlation) is not accompanied by a control for galaxy-to-galaxy variations or for the different spatial resolutions of HST and JWST, both of which could introduce mass-dependent biases.

    Authors: We have addressed this by adding a new figure in the Results section that shows the binned embedded fractions versus mass separately for each galaxy, demonstrating that the trend persists across all four galaxies. To control for spatial resolution differences, we have performed a resolution-matched analysis by convolving the JWST images to match the HST resolution where necessary and re-deriving the fractions; the mass dependence remains robust. These controls will be presented in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational correlation measured directly from data

full rationale

The paper reports an observational measurement of the embedded-to-exposed cluster fraction versus stellar mass in four galaxies using HST and JWST imaging. The claimed dispersal timescale is obtained by converting the observed fractions into timescales via standard assumptions about cluster ages and visibility, without any fitted model, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation that reduces the result to its inputs by construction. No equations or derivations are presented that equate the output correlation to a parameter fitted from the same data; the result is an empirical trend extracted from the catalog. External benchmarks (completeness corrections, age assignments) are invoked but do not create a closed loop within the paper itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about cluster age proxies from multi-wavelength visibility and on the interpretation that embedded clusters represent an earlier evolutionary stage of the same population.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Embedded clusters at a given mass are systematically younger than exposed clusters at the same mass and will eventually emerge on a measurable timescale.
    This assumption underpins the conversion of observed embedded fractions into dispersal timescales.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5622 in / 1150 out tokens · 35424 ms · 2026-05-15T13:00:14.513291+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Disentangling the independently controllable factors of variation by interacting with the world

    Lada, C.J., Lada, E.A.: Embedded Clusters in Molecular Clouds. ARA&A41, 57– 115 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844 arXiv:astro- ph/0301540 [astro-ph]

  2. [2]

    ARA&A57, 227–303 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-091918-104430 arXiv:1812.01615 [astro-ph.GA]

    Krumholz, M.R., McKee, C.F., Bland-Hawthorn, J.: Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time. ARA&A57, 227–303 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-091918-104430 arXiv:1812.01615 [astro-ph.GA]

  3. [3]

    MNRAS512(1), 216–232 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac526 arXiv:2201.00882 [astro-ph.GA]

    Grudi´ c, M.Y., Guszejnov, D., Offner, S.S.R., Rosen, A.L., Raju, A.N., Faucher- Gigu` ere, C.-A., Hopkins, P.F.: The dynamics and outcome of star formation with 24 jets, radiation, winds, and supernovae in concert. MNRAS512(1), 216–232 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac526 arXiv:2201.00882 [astro-ph.GA]

  4. [7]

    ApJ987(1), 12 (2025) https://doi

    Menon, S.H., Burkhart, B., Somerville, R.S., Thompson, T.A., Sternberg, A.: Bursts of Star Formation and Radiation-driven Outflows Produce Efficient LyC Leakage from Dense Compact Star Clusters. ApJ987(1), 12 (2025) https://doi. org/10.3847/1538-4357/add2f9 arXiv:2408.14591 [astro-ph.GA]

  5. [8]

    MNRAS538(3), 2129–2148 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf350 arXiv:2410.01891 [astro-ph.GA] 25

    Lah´ en, N., Rantala, A., Naab, T., Partmann, C., Johansson, P.H., Hislop, J.M.: The formation, evolution, and disruption of star clusters with improved gravita- tional dynamics in simulated dwarf galaxies. MNRAS538(3), 2129–2148 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf350 arXiv:2410.01891 [astro-ph.GA] 25

  6. [9]

    Connecting Young Star Clusters to CO Molecular Gas in NGC 7793 with ALMA-LEGUS

    Grasha, K., Calzetti, D., Bittle, L., Johnson, K.E., Donovan Meyer, J., Ken- nicutt, R.C., Elmegreen, B.G., Adamo, A., Krumholz, M.R., Fumagalli, M., Grebel, E.K., Gouliermis, D.A., Cook, D.O., Gallagher, J.S., Aloisi, A., Dale, D.A., Linden, S., Sacchi, E., Thilker, D.A., Walterbos, R.A.M., Messa, M., Wofford, A., Smith, L.J.: Connecting young star clust...

  7. [10]

    MNRAS509(1), 272–288 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2938 arXiv:2010.13788 [astro-ph.GA]

    Chevance, M., Kruijssen, J.M.D., Krumholz, M.R., Groves, B., Keller, B.W., Hughes, A., Glover, S.C.O., Henshaw, J.D., Herrera, C.N., Kim, J., Leroy, A.K., Pety, J., Razza, A., Rosolowsky, E., Schinnerer, E., Schruba, A., Barnes, A.T., Bigiel, F., Blanc, G.A., Dale, D.A., Emsellem, E., Faesi, C.M., Grasha, K., Klessen, R.S., Kreckel, K., Liu, D., Longmore,...

  8. [11]

    ApJ988(2), 215 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade443

    Kim, J., Chevance, M., Ramambason, L., Kreckel, K., Klessen, R.S., Dale, D.A., Leroy, A.K., Sandstrom, K., Chown, R., Williams, T.G., Sarbadhicary, S.K., Belfiore, F., Bigiel, F., Congiu, E., Egorov, O.V., Emsellem, E., Glover, S.C.O., Grasha, K., Hughes, A., Kruijssen, J.M.D., Lee, J.C., Pathak, D., Pessa, I., Rosolowsky, E., Sun, J., Sutter, J., Thilker...

  9. [12]

    arXiv e-prints, 2507–01508 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.01508 arXiv:2507.01508 [astro-ph.GA]

    Ramambason, L., Chevance, M., Kim, J., Belfiore, F., Kruijssen, J.M.D., Romanelli, A., Amiri, A., Boquien, M., Chown, R., Dale, D.A., Dlamini, S., 26 Egorov, O.V., Gerasimov, I., Glover, S.C.O., Grasha, K., Hassani, H., Kim, H., Kreckel, K., Koziol, H., Leroy, A.K., M´ endez-Delgado, J.E., Neumann, J., Neu- mann, L., Pan, H.-A., Pathak, D., Sandstrom, K.,...

  10. [13]

    ApJ967(2), 133 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad3de6 arXiv:2401.14453 [astro-ph.GA]

    Sun, J., He, H., Batschkun, K., Levy, R.C., Emig, K., Rodr´ ıguez, M.J., Has- sani, H., Leroy, A.K., Schinnerer, E., Ostriker, E.C., Wilson, C.D., Bolatto, A.D., Mills, E.A.C., Rosolowsky, E., Lee, J.C., Dale, D.A., Larson, K.L., Thilker, D.A., Ubeda, L., Whitmore, B.C., Williams, T.G., Barnes, A.T., Bigiel, F., Chevance, M., Glover, S.C.O., Grasha, K., G...

  11. [14]

    ApJL974(2), 27 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eae arXiv:2409.16503 [astro-ph.GA]

    Linden, S.T., Lai, T., Evans, A.S., Armus, L., Larson, K.L., Rich, J.A., U, V., Privon, G.C., Inami, H., Song, Y., Bianchin, M., Bohn, T., Buiten, V.A., Sanchez-Garc´ ıa, M., Kader, J., Lenki´ c, L., Medling, A.M., B¨ oker, T., D´ ıaz- Santos, T., Charmandaris, V., Barcos-Mu˜ noz, L., van der Werf, P., Stierwalt, S., Aalto, S., Appleton, P., Hayward, C.C....

  12. [15]

    ApJ 983(2), 137 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adbb69 arXiv:2412.07862 [astro-ph.GA]

    Rodr´ ıguez, M.J., Lee, J.C., Indebetouw, R., Whitmore, B.C., Maschmann, D., 27 Williams, T.G., Chandar, R., Barnes, A.T., Gnedin, O.Y., Sandstrom, K.M., Rosolowsky, E., Leroy, A.K., Thilker, D.A., Kim, H., Sun, J., Klessen, R.S., Groves, B., Wofford, A., Boquien, M., Dale, D.A., ´Ubeda, L., Larson, K.L., Grasha, K., Johnson, K.E., Levy, R.C., Bigiel, F.,...

  13. [16]

    arXiv e-prints, 2505–08874 (2025) https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08874 arXiv:2505.08874 [astro-ph.GA]

    Knutas, A., Adamo, A., Pedrini, A., Linden, S.T., Bajaj, V., Ryon, J.E., Gregg, B., Ali, A.A., Andersson, E.P., Bik, A., Bortolini, G., Buckner, A.S.M., Calzetti, D., Duarte-Cabral, A., Elmegreen, B.G., Faustino Vieira, H., Gallagher, J.S., Grasha, K., Johnson, K., Lai, T.S.-Y., Lapeer, D., Messa, M., ¨Ostlin, G., Sabbi, E., Smith, L.J., Tosi, M.: FEAST: ...

  14. [17]

    ApJ982(1), 50 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb3a2 arXiv:2503.17921 [astro-ph.GA]

    Whitmore, B.C., Chandar, R., Lee, J.C., Henny, K.F., Rodr´ ıguez, M.J., Baron, D., Bigiel, F., Boquien, M., Chevance, M., Chown, R., Dale, D.A., Floyd, M., Grasha, K., Glover, S.C.O., Gnedin, O., Hassani, H., Indebetouw, R., Kapoor, A.U., Larson, K.L., Leroy, A.K., Maschmann, D., Scheuermann, F., Sutter, J., Schinnerer, E., Sarbadhicary, S.K., Thilker, D....

  15. [18]

    ApJ991(1), 76 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade440

    Henny, K.F., Dale, D.A., Chandar, R., Boquien, M., Thilker, D.A., Whitmore, B.C., Lee, J.C., Rodriguez, M.J., Maschmann, D., Wofford, A., Indebetouw, R., 28 ´Ubeda, L., Groves, B., Hassani, H., Larson, K.L., Williams, T.G., Grasha, K., Pinna, F., Hannon, S.: Star Clusters in the Near-ultraviolet-optical-near-infrared: Spectral Energy Distribution Modeling...

  16. [19]

    ApJ971(1), 32 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad534d arXiv:2406.01666 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pedrini, A., Adamo, A., Calzetti, D., Bik, A., Gregg, B., Linden, S.T., Bajaj, V., Ryon, J.E., Ali, A.A., Bortolini, G., Correnti, M., Elmegreen, B.G., Elmegreen, D.M., Gallagher, J.S., Grasha, K., Gutermuth, R.A., Johnson, K.E., Melinder, J., Messa, M., ¨Ostlin, G., Sabbi, E., Smith, L.J., Tosi, M., Vieira, H.F.: FEAST: Feedback in Emerging extragAlactic...

  17. [20]

    ApJS71, 733 (1989) https: //doi.org/10.1086/191396

    Allamandola, L.J., Tielens, A.G.G.M., Barker, J.R.: Interstellar Polycyclic Aro- matic Hydrocarbons: The Infrared Emission Bands, the Excitation/Emission Mechanism, and the Astrophysical Implications. ApJS71, 733 (1989) https: //doi.org/10.1086/191396

  18. [21]

    ARA&A46, 289–337 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407

    Tielens, A.G.G.M.: Interstellar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon molecules. ARA&A46, 289–337 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407. 145211

  19. [22]

    CIGALE: a python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., Buat, V., Ciesla, L., Corre, D., Inoue, A.K., Salas, H.: CIGALE: a python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission. A&A 622, 103 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 arXiv:1811.03094 [astro-ph.GA]

  20. [23]

    arXiv e-prints, 2509–01670 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.01670 arXiv:2509.01670 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pedrini, A., Adamo, A., Bik, A., Calzetti, D., Linden, S.T., Gregg, B., Bajaj, V., 29 Ryon, J.E., Buckner, A.S.M., Bortolini, G., Cignoni, M., Correnti, M., Duarte- Cabral, A., Elmegreen, B.G., Faustino Vieira, H., Gallagher, J.S., Grasha, K., Johnson, K.E., Krumholz, M.R., Lapeer, D., Lai, T.S.-Y., Messa, M., ¨Ostlin, G., Roos, L., Smith, L.J., Tosi, M.:...

  21. [25]

    Zackrisson, E., Rydberg, C.-E., Schaerer, D., ¨Ostlin, G., Tuli, M.: The Spectral Evolution of the First Galaxies. I. James Webb Space Telescope Detection Limits and Color Criteria for Population III Galaxies. ApJ740(1), 13 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/13 arXiv:1105.0921 [astro-ph.CO]

  22. [26]

    Optimization of Starburst99 for Intermediate-Age and Old Stellar Populations

    V´ azquez, G.A., Leitherer, C.: Optimization of Starburst99 for Intermediate-Age and Old Stellar Populations. ApJ621(2), 695–717 (2005) https://doi.org/10. 1086/427866 arXiv:astro-ph/0412491 [astro-ph]

  23. [27]

    S., Shaviv, N

    Bruzual, G., Charlot, S.: Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003. MNRAS344(4), 1000–1028 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003. 06897.x arXiv:astro-ph/0309134 [astro-ph]

  24. [28]

    The 2013 Release of Cloudy

    Ferland, G.J., Porter, R.L., van Hoof, P.A.M., Williams, R.J.R., Abel, N.P., Lykins, M.L., Shaw, G., Henney, W.J., Stancil, P.C.: The 2013 Release of Cloudy. RMxAA49, 137–163 (2013) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1302.4485 arXiv:1302.4485 [astro-ph.GA] 30

  25. [29]

    AJ126(1), 101–112 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1086/375459

    Johnson, K.E., Indebetouw, R., Pisano, D.J.: Searching for Embedded Super- Star Clusters in IC 4662, NGC 1705, and NGC 5398. AJ126(1), 101–112 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1086/375459

  26. [30]

    From molecules to Young Stellar Clusters: the star formation cycle across the M33 disk

    Corbelli, E., Braine, J., Bandiera, R., Brouillet, N., Combes, F., Druard, C., Gratier, P., Mata, J., Schuster, K., Xilouris, M., Palla, F.: From molecules to young stellar clusters: the star formation cycle across the disk of M 33. A&A 601, 146 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201630034 arXiv:1703.09183 [astro-ph.GA]

  27. [31]

    2009, MNRAS, 398, 515, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14895.x

    Dobbs, C.L., Theis, C., Pringle, J.E., Bate, M.R.: Simulations of the grand design galaxy M51: a case study for analysing tidally induced spiral struc- ture. MNRAS403(2), 625–645 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009. 16161.x arXiv:0912.1201 [astro-ph.GA]

  28. [32]

    MNRAS450(3), 3254–3263 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mnras/stv932

    Pilyugin, L.S., Grebel, E.K., Zinchenko, I.A.: On the radial abundance gradients in discs of irregular galaxies. MNRAS450(3), 3254–3263 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mnras/stv932

  29. [33]

    ApJ997(1), 20 (2026) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae1ca8 arXiv:2511.06481 [astro-ph.GA]

    Gregg, B., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., Pedrini, A., Linden, S.T., Bajaj, V., Ryon, J.E., Bik, A., Bortolini, G., Correnti, M., Draine, B.T., Elmegreen, B.G., Faustino Vieira, H., Gallagher, J.S., Grasha, K., Johnson, K.E., Lai, T.S.-Y., Messa, M., ¨Ostlin, G., Smith, L.J., Tosi, M.: The Calibration of Short-wavelength Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emission...

  30. [34]

    arXiv e-prints, 2509–04662 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2509.04662 arXiv:2509.04662 [astro-ph.GA]

    Lai, T.S.-Y., Duval, S., Smith, J.D.T., Armus, L., Witt, A.N., Sandstrom, K., Tarantino, E., Baba, S., Bolatto, A., Donnelly, G.P., Hensley, B.S., Imanishi, M., Lenkic, L., Linden, S., Nakagawa, T., Spoon, H.W.W., Togi, A., Whitcomb, 31 C.M.: Resolving Emission from Small Dust Grains in the Blue Compact Dwarf II Zw 40 with JWST. arXiv e-prints, 2509–04662...

  31. [35]

    Instantaneous starburst of the massive clusters Westerlund 1 and NGC 3603 YC

    Kudryavtseva, N., Brandner, W., Gennaro, M., Rochau, B., Stolte, A., Ander- sen, M., Da Rio, N., Henning, T., Tognelli, E., Hogg, D., Clark, S., Waters, R.: Instantaneous Starburst of the Massive Clusters Westerlund 1 and NGC 3603 YC. ApJL750(2), 44 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/750/2/L44 arXiv:1204.5481 [astro-ph.GA]

  32. [36]

    Reaction of Massive Clusters to Gas Expulsion - The cluster density dependence

    Pfalzner, S., Kaczmarek, T.: Reaction of massive clusters to gas expulsion - The cluster density dependence. A&A555, 135 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/201321362 arXiv:1305.6699 [astro-ph.GA]

  33. [37]

    MNRAS515(1), 167–184 (2022) https://doi

    Guszejnov, D., Markey, C., Offner, S.S.R., Grudi´ c, M.Y., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Rosen, A.L., Hopkins, P.F.: Cluster assembly and the origin of mass segregation in the STARFORGE simulations. MNRAS515(1), 167–184 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1093/mnras/stac1737 arXiv:2201.01781 [astro-ph.GA]

  34. [38]

    Kawamura, A., Mizuno, Y., Minamidani, T., Filipovi´ c, M.D., Staveley-Smith, L., Kim, S., Mizuno, N., Onishi, T., Mizuno, A., Fukui, Y.: The Second Survey of the Molecular Clouds in the Large Magellanic Cloud by NANTEN. II. Star Formation. ApJS184(1), 1–17 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/184/ 1/1 arXiv:0908.1168 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [39]

    ApJL944(2), 20 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aca90a arXiv:2211.15698 [astro-ph.GA]

    Kim, J., Chevance, M., Kruijssen, J.M.D., Barnes, A.T., Bigiel, F., Blanc, G.A., Boquien, M., Cao, Y., Congiu, E., Dale, D.A., Egorov, O.V., Faesi, C.M., Glover, S.C.O., Grasha, K., Groves, B., Hassani, H., Hughes, A., Klessen, R.S., Kreckel, K., Larson, K.L., Lee, J.C., Leroy, A.K., Liu, D., Longmore, S.N., Meidt, S.E., Pan, H.-A., Pety, J., Querejeta, M...

  36. [40]

    ARA&A62(1), 369–436 (2024) https://doi

    Schinnerer, E., Leroy, A.K.: Molecular Gas and the Star-Formation Process on Cloud Scales in Nearby Galaxies. ARA&A62(1), 369–436 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052651 arXiv:2403.19843 [astro-ph.GA]

  37. [42]

    MNRAS508(4), 5362–5389 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2958 arXiv:2110.05492 [astro-ph.GA]

    Barnes, A.T., Glover, S.C.O., Kreckel, K., Ostriker, E.C., Bigiel, F., Belfiore, F., Beˇ sli´ c, I., Blanc, G.A., Chevance, M., Dale, D.A., Egorov, O., Eiben- steiner, C., Emsellem, E., Grasha, K., Groves, B.A., Klessen, R.S., Kruijssen, J.M.D., Leroy, A.K., Longmore, S.N., Lopez, L., McElroy, R., Meidt, S.E., Mur- phy, E.J., Rosolowsky, E., Saito, T., Sa...

  38. [43]

    Della Bruna, L., Adamo, A., McLeod, A.F., Smith, L.J., Savard, G., Robert, C., Sun, J., Amram, P., Bik, A., Blair, W.P., Long, K.S., Renaud, F., Walterbos, R., Usher, C.: Stellar feedback in M 83 as observed with MUSE. II. Analysis of the H II region population: Ionisation budget and pre-SN feedback. A&A666, 29 (2022) 33 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/...

  39. [44]

    Physical limits to the validity of synthesis models: The Lowest Luminosity Limit

    Cervi˜ no, M., Luridiana, V.: Physical limits to the validity of synthesis models. The Lowest Luminosity Limit. A&A413, 145–157 (2004) https://doi.org/10. 1051/0004-6361:20031454 arXiv:astro-ph/0304061 [astro-ph]

  40. [45]

    ARA&A62(1), 63–111 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-052622-031748 arXiv:2404.07301 [astro-ph.GA]

    Hennebelle, P., Grudi´ c, M.Y.: The Physical Origin of the Stellar Ini- tial Mass Function. ARA&A62(1), 63–111 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-052622-031748 arXiv:2404.07301 [astro-ph.GA]

  41. [46]

    MNRAS506(2), 2199–2231 (2021) https://doi.org/10

    Grudi´ c, M.Y., Guszejnov, D., Hopkins, P.F., Offner, S.S.R., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A.: STARFORGE: Towards a comprehensive numerical model of star cluster formation and feedback. MNRAS506(2), 2199–2231 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/stab1347 arXiv:2010.11254 [astro-ph.IM]

  42. [47]

    arXiv e-prints, 2509–18322 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.18322 arXiv:2509.18322 [astro-ph.SR]

    Wainer, T.M., Dalcanton, J.J., Grudi´ c, M.Y., Offner, S.S.R., Smercina, A., Williams, B.F., Johnson, L.C., Peltonen, J., Koch, E.W., Neralwar, K.R.: The Timescales of Embedded Star Formation as Observed in STARFORGE. arXiv e-prints, 2509–18322 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.18322 arXiv:2509.18322 [astro-ph.SR]

  43. [48]

    Kim, J.-G., Kim, W.-T., Ostriker, E.C.: Modeling UV Radiation Feedback from Massive Stars. II. Dispersal of Star-forming Giant Molecular Clouds by Photoion- ization and Radiation Pressure. ApJ859(1), 68 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aabe27 arXiv:1804.04664 [astro-ph.GA]

  44. [49]

    2009, MNRAS, 398, 515, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14895.x

    Weidner, C., Kroupa, P., Bonnell, I.A.D.: The relation between the most-massive star and its parental star cluster mass. MNRAS401(1), 275–293 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15633.x arXiv:0909.1555 [astro-ph.SR]

  45. [50]

    MNRAS522(3), 4430–4443 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1185 arXiv:2304.09549 [astro-ph.GA]

    Stanway, E.R., Eldridge, J.J.: Exploring the impact of IMF and binary parameter 34 stochasticity with a binary population synthesis code. MNRAS522(3), 4430–4443 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1185 arXiv:2304.09549 [astro-ph.GA]

  46. [51]

    2024, in Comets III, ed

    Longmore, S.N., Kruijssen, J.M.D., Bastian, N., Bally, J., Rathborne, J., Testi, L., Stolte, A., Dale, J., Bressert, E., Alves, J.: The Formation and Early Evo- lution of Young Massive Clusters. In: Beuther, H., Klessen, R.S., Dullemond, C.P., Henning, T. (eds.) Protostars and Planets VI, pp. 291–314 (2014). https: //doi.org/10.2458/azu uapress 9780816531...

  47. [52]

    European Physical Journal Plus137(10), 1132 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Winter, A.J., Haworth, T.J.: The external photoevaporation of planet-forming discs. European Physical Journal Plus137(10), 1132 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjp/s13360-022-03314-1 arXiv:2206.11910 [astro-ph.EP]

  48. [53]

    A&A578, 4 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424132

    Stolte, A., Hussmann, B., Olczak, C., Brandner, W., Habibi, M., Ghez, A.M., Morris, M.R., Lu, J.R., Clarkson, W.I., Anderson, J.: Circumstellar discs in galac- tic centre clusters: Disc-bearing b-type stars in the quintuplet and arches clusters. A&A578, 4 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424132

  49. [54]

    ApJL939(1), 10 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac9839

    Pfalzner, S., Dehghani, S., Michel, A.: Most planets might have more than 5 myr of time to form. ApJL939(1), 10 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac9839

  50. [55]

    Nature Astronomy4, 1158–1163 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-020-1150-z arXiv:2007.13430 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pineda, J.E., Segura-Cox, D., Caselli, P., Cunningham, N., Zhao, B., Schmiedeke, A., Maureira, M.J., Neri, R.: A protostellar system fed by a streamer of 10,500 au length. Nature Astronomy4, 1158–1163 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-020-1150-z arXiv:2007.13430 [astro-ph.GA]

  51. [56]

    European Physical Jour- nal Plus138(3), 272 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03880-y arXiv:2303.05261 [astro-ph.SR] 35

    Kuffmeier, M., Jensen, S.S., Haugbølle, T.: Rejuvenating infall: a crucial yet overlooked source of mass and angular momentum. European Physical Jour- nal Plus138(3), 272 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03880-y arXiv:2303.05261 [astro-ph.SR] 35

  52. [57]

    Dynamical analysis of the streamers around S CrA and HL Tau

    Gupta, A., Miotello, A., Williams, J.P., Birnstiel, T., Kuffmeier, M., Yen, H.-W.: TIPSY: Trajectory of Infalling Particles in Streamers around Young stars. Dynamical analysis of the streamers around S CrA and HL Tau. A&A 683, 133 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348007 arXiv:2401.10403 [astro-ph.SR]

  53. [58]

    Nature Astronomy9, 862–871 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-025-02529-3 arXiv:2405.07334 [astro-ph.GA]

    Padoan, P., Pan, L., Pelkonen, V.-M., Haugbølle, T., Nordlund, ˚A.: The formation of protoplanetary disks through pre-main-sequence Bondi-Hoyle accretion. Nature Astronomy9, 862–871 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-025-02529-3 arXiv:2405.07334 [astro-ph.GA]

  54. [59]

    MNRAS537(4), 3313–3330 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ staf243 arXiv:2502.04447 [astro-ph.SR]

    Haworth, T.J., McCaughrean, M.J., Pearson, S.G., Booth, R.A.: A possible trail of dust from a young, highly extincted brown dwarf in the outskirts of the Trapez- ium Cluster. MNRAS537(4), 3313–3330 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ staf243 arXiv:2502.04447 [astro-ph.SR]

  55. [60]

    MNRAS522(2), 1939–1950 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad944 arXiv:2303.15177 [astro-ph.EP]

    Qiao, L., Coleman, G.A.L., Haworth, T.J.: Planet formation via pebble accretion in externally photoevaporating discs. MNRAS522(2), 1939–1950 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad944 arXiv:2303.15177 [astro-ph.EP]

  56. [61]

    Summary of the content and survey properties

    Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A.G.A., Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J.H.J., Arenou, F., Babusiaux, C., Biermann, M., Creevey, O.L., Ducourant, C., Evans, D.W., Eyer, L., Guerra, R., Hutton, A., Jordi, C., Klioner, S.A., Lammers, U.L., Lindegren, L., Luri, X., Mignard, F., Panem, C., Pourbaix, D., Randich, S., Sartoretti, P., Soubiran, C., Tanga, P.,...

  57. [62]

    ApJ971(1), 115 (2024) 39 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad54b4 arXiv:2405.09667 [astro-ph.GA]

    Gregg, B., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., Bajaj, V., Ryon, J.E., Linden, S.T., Cor- renti, M., Cignoni, M., Messa, M., Sabbi, E., Gallagher, J.S., Grasha, K., Pedrini, A., Gutermuth, R.A., Melinder, J., Kotulla, R., P´ erez, G., Krumholz, M.R., Bik, A., ¨Ostlin, G., Johnson, K.E., Bortolini, G., Smith, L.J., Tosi, M., Maji, S., Faustino Vieira, H.: Feedback in ...

  58. [63]

    ApJ971(1), 118 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ad53c0 arXiv:2406.01831 [astro-ph.GA]

    Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., Linden, S.T., Gregg, B., Krumholz, M.R., Bajaj, V., Bik, A., Cignoni, M., Correnti, M., Elmegreen, B., Faustino Vieira, H., Gallagher, J.S., Grasha, K., Gutermuth, R.A., Johnson, K.E., Messa, M., Melinder, J., ¨Ostlin, G., Pedrini, A., Sabbi, E., Smith, L.J., Tosi, M.: JWST-FEAST: Feedback in Emerging extrAgalactic Star clusTers: ...

  59. [64]

    ApJL944(2), 14 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acae94 arXiv:2212.12039 [astro-ph.GA]

    Whitmore, B.C., Chandar, R., Rodr´ ıguez, M.J., Lee, J.C., Emsellem, E., Floyd, M., Kim, H., Kruijssen, J.M.D., Mok, A., Sormani, M.C., Boquien, M., Dale, D.A., Faesi, C.M., Henny, K.F., Hannon, S., Thilker, D.A., White, R.L., Barnes, A.T., Bigiel, F., Chevance, M., Henshaw, J.D., Klessen, R.S., Leroy, A.K., Liu, D., Maschmann, D., Meidt, S.E., Rosolowsky...

  60. [65]

    MNRAS424(1), 65–79 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21152.x arXiv:1204.5474 [astro-ph.GA]

    Oh, S., Kroupa, P.: The influence of stellar dynamical ejections and collisions on the relation between the maximum stellar and star cluster mass. MNRAS424(1), 65–79 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21152.x arXiv:1204.5474 [astro-ph.GA]

  61. [66]

    Dynamical ejections of massive stars from young star clusters under diverse initial conditions

    Oh, S., Kroupa, P.: Dynamical ejections of massive stars from young star clusters under diverse initial conditions. A&A590, 107 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/201628233 arXiv:1604.00006 [astro-ph.GA]

  62. [67]

    The expansion of massive young star clusters - observation meets theory

    Pfalzner, S., Kaczmarek, T.: The expansion of massive young star clusters - obser- vation meets theory. A&A559, 38 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 40 201322134 arXiv:1309.0315 [astro-ph.GA]

  63. [68]

    Massive runaways and walkaway stars

    Renzo, M., Zapartas, E., de Mink, S.E., G¨ otberg, Y., Justham, S., Farmer, R.J., Izzard, R.G., Toonen, S., Sana, H.: Massive runaway and walkaway stars. A study of the kinematical imprints of the physical processes governing the evolution and explosion of their binary progenitors. A&A624, 66 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1051/0004-6361/201833297 arXiv:1804....

  64. [69]

    Astropy: A Community Python Package for Astronomy

    Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T.P., Tollerud, E.J., Greenfield, P., Droett- boom, M., Bray, E., Aldcroft, T., Davis, M., Ginsburg, A., Price-Whelan, A.M., Kerzendorf, W.E., Conley, A., Crighton, N., Barbary, K., Muna, D., Fergu- son, H., Grollier, F., Parikh, M.M., Nair, P.H., Unther, H.M., Deil, C., Woillez, J., Conseil, S., Kramer, R., Turner, J.E....

  65. [70]

    The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation

    Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S.C., Varoquaux, G.: The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation. Computing in Science and Engineer- ing13(2), 22–30 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 arXiv:1102.1523 [cs.MS]

  66. [71]

    Nature Methods17, 261–272 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41592-019-0686-2

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T.E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Courna- peau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S.J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K.J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A.R.J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C.J., Polat, ˙I., Feng, Y., Moore, E.W., Vander- Plas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Ci...

  67. [72]

    Computing in Science & Engineering9(3), 90–95 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    Hunter, J.D.: Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering9(3), 90–95 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

  68. [73]

    https://doi.org/10

    The pandas development team: Pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas. https://doi.org/10. 5281/zenodo.3509134 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509134 42