pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.15755 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-16 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Negative running of gravitational positivity

J. Fernandez , M. Ruhdorfer , J. Serra
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 09:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords negative runningWilson coefficientsgraviton loopsspecies bounddispersive boundseffective field theorynon-minimal couplingspositivity bounds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-minimal three-point interactions induce negative running of Wilson coefficients in gravitational EFTs, but graviton loops dominate after smearing under the species bound.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In effective field theories of shift-symmetric scalars, photons, and gravitons, certain non-minimal three-point interactions generate negative one-loop beta functions for the leading Wilson coefficients, with the running suppressed by the Planck scale. This causes the coefficients to decrease as the energy scale flows toward the infrared, which requires revisiting the dispersive bounds that these operators must satisfy. The analysis incorporates the effects of graviton loops, which contribute positively to the infrared behavior of the coefficients. When these positive contributions are smeared over the momentum transfer, they are found to dominate the negative running provided the total number of non-minimally coupled particles remains below the species bound.

Core claim

Certain non-minimal three-point interactions induce a negative running of the corresponding Wilson coefficients, with beta-functions suppressed by the Planck scale. The decrease of the coefficients toward the infrared prompts us to revisit their dispersive bounds, in particular accounting for graviton loops. Gravitational interactions generate positive infrared contributions which, after smearing over the momentum transfer, are argued to dominate over the negative running, provided the number of non-minimally coupled particles is bounded from above according to the species bound.

What carries the argument

One-loop renormalization group evolution of Wilson coefficients driven by non-minimal three-point interactions, with positive infrared contributions from graviton loops after momentum smearing.

Load-bearing premise

Positive infrared contributions from graviton loops dominate the negative running from non-minimal interactions after smearing over momentum transfer, provided the number of non-minimally coupled particles is bounded by the species bound.

What would settle it

An explicit one-loop calculation in an EFT with particle number exceeding the species bound showing that a Wilson coefficient becomes negative at low energies.

read the original abstract

We investigate the one-loop renormalization group evolution in four dimensions of the leading operators in the effective field theories of shift-symmetric scalars, photons, and gravitons. We show that certain non-minimal three-point interactions induce a negative running of the corresponding Wilson coefficients, with beta-functions suppressed by the Planck scale. The decrease of the coefficients toward the infrared prompts us to revisit their dispersive bounds, in particular accounting for graviton loops. Gravitational interactions generate positive infrared contributions which, after smearing over the momentum transfer, are argued to dominate over the negative running, provided the number of non-minimally coupled particles is bounded from above according to the species bound.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the one-loop renormalization group evolution in four dimensions of leading operators in effective field theories of shift-symmetric scalars, photons, and gravitons. It shows that certain non-minimal three-point interactions induce negative running of the corresponding Wilson coefficients, with beta-functions suppressed by the Planck scale. The decrease of the coefficients toward the infrared prompts a revisit of their dispersive bounds, accounting for graviton loops. Gravitational interactions generate positive infrared contributions which, after smearing over the momentum transfer, are argued to dominate over the negative running, provided the number of non-minimally coupled particles is bounded from above according to the species bound.

Significance. If the dominance of smeared graviton-loop contributions holds under the species bound, the result would strengthen the case for gravitational positivity by showing that negative running from non-minimal couplings is overpowered by positive IR effects from gravity, with implications for the consistency of EFTs coupled to quantum gravity and the robustness of dispersive bounds on Wilson coefficients.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (smearing argument): The claim that positive infrared contributions from graviton loops dominate the negative running after smearing over momentum transfer is central to restoring the dispersive bounds, yet the explicit smearing kernel, the resulting integral inequality, and the demonstration that the species bound closes all enhancements (e.g., logarithmic or cutoff-dependent) are not provided, leaving the quantitative comparison as an assertion rather than a controlled estimate.
  2. [§3] §3 (beta functions): The one-loop beta-function expressions for the negative running induced by non-minimal three-point interactions are not displayed explicitly, nor are error estimates or the precise dependence on the number of species; this omission affects assessment of the Planck suppression and the conditions under which the species bound suffices to ensure dominance.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] The introduction could include a brief table summarizing the signs and Planck suppression of the beta functions for the different fields (scalars, photons, gravitons) to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us identify points where the manuscript can be strengthened with additional explicit details. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (smearing argument): The claim that positive infrared contributions from graviton loops dominate the negative running after smearing over momentum transfer is central to restoring the dispersive bounds, yet the explicit smearing kernel, the resulting integral inequality, and the demonstration that the species bound closes all enhancements (e.g., logarithmic or cutoff-dependent) are not provided, leaving the quantitative comparison as an assertion rather than a controlled estimate.

    Authors: We agree that the smearing argument benefits from a fully explicit treatment. In the revised manuscript we will define the smearing kernel, derive the resulting integral inequality that establishes dominance of the positive graviton-loop IR contributions, and demonstrate explicitly how the species bound eliminates logarithmic or cutoff-dependent enhancements, rendering the comparison quantitative and controlled. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (beta functions): The one-loop beta-function expressions for the negative running induced by non-minimal three-point interactions are not displayed explicitly, nor are error estimates or the precise dependence on the number of species; this omission affects assessment of the Planck suppression and the conditions under which the species bound suffices to ensure dominance.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission of the explicit expressions. The revised version will display the complete one-loop beta functions for the relevant Wilson coefficients, including their dependence on the number of species and estimates of higher-order corrections. This will make the Planck suppression and the role of the species bound fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper first computes one-loop beta functions for Wilson coefficients of non-minimal three-point operators, obtaining Planck-suppressed negative running. It then incorporates graviton-loop contributions into the dispersive integrals for positivity bounds. The claim that smeared positive IR pieces dominate the negative running (when species number respects the bound) is presented as an argument rather than a reduction of one quantity to another by definition or by fitting a parameter to the target observable. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain is exhibited in the provided text; the central estimates remain independent calculations whose comparison rests on an external species bound rather than internal redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard EFT dispersion relations and the species bound; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dispersive bounds from causality and unitarity apply to the Wilson coefficients of gravitational EFTs
    Invoked when revisiting the bounds after including graviton loops.
  • domain assumption The species bound limits the number of non-minimally coupled particles
    Used to ensure positive IR contributions dominate the negative running.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5396 in / 1524 out tokens · 48668 ms · 2026-05-15T09:49:20.535825+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Sampling the Graviton Pole and Deprojecting the Swampland

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A sampling-based bootstrap for graviton poles in EFTs yields non-projective bounds that fix the EFT cutoff scale relative to the Planck mass, with M/M_P ≲ 7.8 in D=5.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi,Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion,JHEP10(2006) 014, [hep-th/0602178]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    Weinberg,Infrared photons and gravitons,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Infrared photons and gravitons,Phys. Rev.140(1965) B516–B524

    work page 1965

  4. [4]

    Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP12(2014) 087, [1407.7865]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Hamada, T

    Y. Hamada, T. Noumi and G. Shiu,Weak Gravity Conjecture from Unitarity and Causality, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 051601, [1810.03637]

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Bellazzini, M

    B. Bellazzini, M. Lewandowski and J. Serra,Positivity of Amplitudes, Weak Gravity Conjecture, and Modified Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 251103, [1902.03250]

    work page arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    A. M. Charles,The Weak Gravity Conjecture, RG Flows, and Supersymmetry,1906.07734

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  8. [8]

    Alberte, C

    L. Alberte, C. de Rham, S. Jaitly and A. J. Tolley,Positivity Bounds and the Massless Spin-2 Pole,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 125023, [2007.12667]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, J.-Y. Liu and G. N. Remmen,Causality, unitarity, and the weak gravity conjecture,JHEP03(2022) 083, [2109.13937]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Henriksson, B

    J. Henriksson, B. McPeak, F. Russo and A. Vichi,Bounding violations of the weak gravity conjecture,JHEP08(2022) 184, [2203.08164]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Caron-Huot and Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot and Y.-Z. Li,Gravity and a universal cutoff for field theory,2408.06440

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Positive Signs in Massive Gravity

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Positive Signs in Massive Gravity,JHEP04(2016) 002, [1601.04068]. – 47 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Beyond Amplitudes' Positivity and the Fate of Massive Gravity

    B. Bellazzini, F. Riva, J. Serra and F. Sgarlata,Beyond Positivity Bounds and the Fate of Massive Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 161101, [1710.02539]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Positivity Bounds for Massive Spin-1 and Spin-2 Fields

    C. de Rham, S. Melville, A. J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou,Positivity Bounds for Massive Spin-1 and Spin-2 Fields,JHEP03(2019) 182, [1804.10624]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Bellazzini, G

    B. Bellazzini, G. Isabella, S. Ricossa and F. Riva,Massive gravity is not positive,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 024051, [2304.02550]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    X. O. Camanho, J. D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov,Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling,JHEP02(2016) 020, [1407.5597]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves

    S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang and L. Senatore,An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves,JHEP09(2017) 122, [1704.01590]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Caron-Huot, Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and D. Simmons-Duffin,Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity,JHEP05(2023) 122, [2201.06602]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Serra, J

    F. Serra, J. Serra, E. Trincherini and L. G. Trombetta,Causality constraints on black holes beyond GR,JHEP08(2022) 157, [2205.08551]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity

    B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 064076, [1509.00851]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Positivity of Curvature-Squared Corrections in Gravity

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Positivity of Curvature-Squared Corrections in Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 051601, [1608.02942]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Tokuda, K

    J. Tokuda, K. Aoki and S. Hirano,Gravitational positivity bounds,JHEP11(2020) 054, [2007.15009]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Herrero-Valea, R

    M. Herrero-Valea, R. Santos-Garcia and A. Tokareva,Massless positivity in graviton exchange,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 085022, [2011.11652]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Arkani-Hamed, T.-C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang and Y.-t. Huang,The EFT-Hedron,JHEP05(2021) 259, [2012.15849]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Caron-Huot, D

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli and D. Simmons-Duffin,Sharp boundaries for the swampland,JHEP07(2021) 110, [2102.08951]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos and A. Zhiboedov,Gravitational effective field theory islands, low-spin dominance, and the four-graviton amplitude,J. Phys. A54(2021) 344002, [2103.12728]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Bellazzini, G

    B. Bellazzini, G. Isabella, M. Lewandowski and F. Sgarlata,Gravitational causality and the self-stress of photons,JHEP05(2022) 154, [2108.05896]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Chiang, Y.-t

    L.-Y. Chiang, Y.-t. Huang, W. Li, L. Rodina and H.-C. Weng,(Non)-projective bounds on gravitational EFT,2201.07177

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Caron-Huot, Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and D. Simmons-Duffin,Graviton partial waves and causality in higher dimensions,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 026007, [2205.01495]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Bellazzini, G

    B. Bellazzini, G. Isabella and M. M. Riva,Classical vs quantum eikonal scattering and its causal structure,JHEP04(2023) 023, [2211.00085]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    de Rham, S

    C. de Rham, S. Jaitly and A. J. Tolley,Constraints on Regge behavior from IR physics, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 046011, [2212.04975]. – 48 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Hong, Z.-H

    D.-Y. Hong, Z.-H. Wang and S.-Y. Zhou,Causality bounds on scalar-tensor EFTs,JHEP 10(2023) 135, [2304.01259]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    McPeak, M

    B. McPeak, M. Venuti and A. Vichi,Adding subtractions: comparing the impact of different Regge behaviors,2310.06888

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Caron-Huot and J

    S. Caron-Huot and J. Tokuda,String loops and gravitational positivity bounds: imprint of light particles at high energies,JHEP11(2024) 055, [2406.07606]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Beadle, G

    C. Beadle, G. Isabella, D. Perrone, S. Ricossa, F. Riva and F. Serra,Non-Forward UV/IR Relations,2407.02346

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Alviani and A

    E. Alviani and A. Falkowski,Matching and positivity beyond minimal coupling in effective theories of photons and gravitons,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 154, [2408.03439]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Z.-Y. Dong, T. Ma, A. Pomarol and F. Sciotti,Bootstrapping the Chiral-Gravitational Anomaly,2411.14422

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Bellazzini, A

    B. Bellazzini, A. Pomarol, M. Romano and F. Sciotti,(Super) Gravity from Positivity, 2507.12535

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    de Rham, S

    C. de Rham, S. Kundu, M. Reece, A. J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou,Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022,2203.06805

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Baratella, D

    P. Baratella, D. Haslehner, M. Ruhdorfer, J. Serra and A. Weiler,RG of GR from on-shell amplitudes,JHEP03(2022) 156, [2109.06191]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Positivity with Long-Range Interactions

    B. Bellazzini, J. Berman, G. Isabella, F. Riva, M. Romano and F. Sciotti,Positivity with Long-Range Interactions,2512.13780

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Chang and J

    C.-H. Chang and J. Parra-Martinez,Graviton loops and negativity,2501.17949

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Beadle, G

    C. Beadle, G. Isabella, D. Perrone, S. Ricossa, F. Riva and F. Serra,The EFT Bootstrap at FiniteM P L,2501.18465

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Ruhdorfer, J

    M. Ruhdorfer, J. Serra and A. Weiler,Effective Field Theory of Gravity to All Orders, JHEP05(2020) 083, [1908.08050]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Durieux and C

    G. Durieux and C. S. Machado,Enumerating higher-dimensional operators with on-shell amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 095021, [1912.08827]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Fernandez,To appear,

    J. Fernandez,To appear,

    work page

  47. [47]

    Alviani, A

    E. Alviani, A. Falkowski and P. Marinellis,UV completions of scalar-tensor EFTs,JHEP 01(2026) 060, [2507.11426]

    work page arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    D. A. McGady and L. Rodina,Higher-spin masslessS-matrices in four-dimensions,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 084048, [1311.2938]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Scalar One Loop Integrals,Nucl. Phys. B153(1979) 365–401

    work page 1979

  50. [50]

    Passarino and M

    G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman,One Loop Corrections for e+ e- Annihilation Into mu+ mu- in the Weinberg Model,Nucl. Phys. B160(1979) 151–207

    work page 1979

  51. [51]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon and D. A. Kosower,Dimensionally regulated pentagon integrals,Nucl. Phys. B412(1994) 751–816, [hep-ph/9306240]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  52. [52]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B435(1995) 59–101, [hep-ph/9409265]. – 49 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  53. [53]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217–260, [hep-ph/9403226]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  54. [54]

    Generalized Unitarity and One-Loop Amplitudes in N=4 Super-Yang-Mills

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng,Generalized unitarity and one-loop amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills,Nucl. Phys. B725(2005) 275–305, [hep-th/0412103]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  55. [55]

    Direct extraction of one-loop integral coefficients

    D. Forde,Direct extraction of one-loop integral coefficients,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 125019, [0704.1835]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  56. [56]

    What is the Simplest Quantum Field Theory?

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo and J. Kaplan,What is the Simplest Quantum Field Theory?,JHEP09(2010) 016, [0808.1446]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  57. [57]

    One-loop renormalization and the S-matrix

    Y.-t. Huang, D. A. McGady and C. Peng,One-loop renormalization and the S-matrix, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 085028, [1205.5606]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    Renormalization group coefficients and the S-matrix

    S. Caron-Huot and M. Wilhelm,Renormalization group coefficients and the S-matrix, JHEP12(2016) 010, [1607.06448]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Elias Mir´ o, J

    J. Elias Mir´ o, J. Ingoldby and M. Riembau,EFT anomalous dimensions from the S-matrix, JHEP09(2020) 163, [2005.06983]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Baratella, C

    P. Baratella, C. Fernandez and A. Pomarol,Renormalization of Higher-Dimensional Operators from On-shell Amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B959(2020) 115155, [2005.07129]

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Jiang, T

    M. Jiang, T. Ma and J. Shu,Renormalization Group Evolution from On-shell SMEFT, JHEP01(2021) 101, [2005.10261]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    D. C. Dunbar and P. S. Norridge,Infinities within graviton scattering amplitudes,Class. Quant. Grav.14(1997) 351–365, [hep-th/9512084]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  63. [63]

    Collinear and Soft Divergences in Perturbative Quantum Gravity

    R. Akhoury, R. Saotome and G. Sterman,Collinear and Soft Divergences in Perturbative Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 104040, [1109.0270]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [64]

    Soft-collinear gravity

    M. Beneke and G. Kirilin,Soft-collinear gravity,JHEP09(2012) 066, [1207.4926]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Non-renormalization Theorems without Supersymmetry

    C. Cheung and C.-H. Shen,Nonrenormalization Theorems without Supersymmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 071601, [1505.01844]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez and E. Sawyer,Nonrenormalization and Operator Mixing via On-Shell Methods,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 051601, [1910.05831]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Jiang, J

    M. Jiang, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao and Y.-H. Zheng,Partial Wave Amplitude Basis and Selection Rules in Effective Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 011601, [2001.04481]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    Baratella, C

    P. Baratella, C. Fernandez, B. von Harling and A. Pomarol,Anomalous Dimensions of Effective Theories from Partial Waves,JHEP03(2021) 287, [2010.13809]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Falsifying Models of New Physics Via WW Scattering

    J. Distler, B. Grinstein, R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Falsifying Models of New Physics via WW Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 041601, [hep-ph/0604255]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  70. [70]

    Bellazzini, J

    B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Mir´ o, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau and F. Riva,Positive moments for scattering amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 036006, [2011.00037]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Trott,Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory,JHEP07(2021) 143, [2011.10058]

    T. Trott,Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory,JHEP07(2021) 143, [2011.10058]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Y.-P. Liao, J. Roosmale Nepveu and C.-H. Shen,Positivity in Perturbative Renormalization: an EFTa-theorem,2505.02910. – 50 –

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    Hebbar, D

    A. Hebbar, D. Karateev and J. Penedones,Spinning S-matrix bootstrap in 4d,JHEP01 (2022) 060, [2011.11708]

    work page arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Bellazzini, M

    B. Bellazzini, M. Riembau and F. Riva,IR side of positivity bounds,Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 105008, [2112.12561]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    H¨ aring and A

    K. H¨ aring and A. Zhiboedov,Gravitational Regge bounds,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 034, [2202.08280]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    H¨ aring and A

    K. H¨ aring and A. Zhiboedov,What is the graviton pole made of?,2410.21499

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    T. N. Pham and T. N. Truong,Evaluation of the Derivative Quartic Terms of the Meson Chiral Lagrangian From Forward Dispersion Relation,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 3027

    work page 1985

  78. [78]

    Softness and Amplitudes' Positivity for Spinning Particles

    B. Bellazzini,Softness and amplitudes’ positivity for spinning particles,JHEP02(2017) 034, [1605.06111]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    Henriksson, B

    J. Henriksson, B. McPeak, F. Russo and A. Vichi,Rigorous bounds on light-by-light scattering,JHEP06(2022) 158, [2107.13009]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Sinha and A

    A. Sinha and A. Zahed,Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations in Quantum Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 181601, [2012.04877]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.