Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 96 references

Deterministic hydrodynamics plus disorder alone make microswimmers diffuse, hop, and trap in porous media.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Deterministic hydrodynamics plus disorder alone produce effective diffusion and reversible pusher–puller trapping asymmetry for squirmers in 2D porous media.

T0 review reviewed 2026-07-14 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid 2D Stokes–squirmer simulations show disorder alone can produce diffusion and hop-and-trap localization, with a near-field cutoff that can reverse pusher–puller trapping; the result is real within the model but the cutoff and 2D idealization are load-bearing. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.21285 v1 pith:7DWMPHI4 submitted 2026-03-22 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph

Disorder-induced persistent random motion and trapping of microswimmers

Mirko Residori , Sebastian Aland , Christina Kurzthaler This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph
keywords microswimmerssquirmersporous mediahydrodynamic interactionstrappingpushers and pullershopping-and-trappingdisorder-induced diffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Microswimmers in crowded porous environments often hop between traps, yet theory usually either ignores fluid forces or adds random tumbling by hand. This paper asks whether the coupling of self-propulsion, Stokes hydrodynamics, and fixed obstacle disorder is already enough to produce those transport patterns. Using full finite-element simulations of two-dimensional disk-shaped squirmers, the authors show that successive hydrodynamic scatterings randomize direction and yield effective diffusion even without noise. Strong pushers and pullers localize either by static corner trapping or by quasi-periodic orbital trapping between obstacles; they can also escape dynamic traps, producing hopping-and-trapping trajectories. A clear pusher–puller asymmetry in trapping probability appears and can be reversed simply by changing the short-range repulsive cutoff, underscoring how sensitive the statistics are to near-field details. The result matters for anyone who wants to predict or design microbial or microrobot transport through soil, tissue, or filters without assuming extra stochastic mechanisms.

Core claim

The deterministic coupling of activity, full hydrodynamic interactions, and spatial disorder is sufficient to generate effective diffusive transport of squirmers in two-dimensional porous media; strong pushers and pullers become localized by static geometric trapping or dynamic orbital trapping according to swimmer type and packing fraction, can escape dynamic traps to produce hopping-and-trapping motion, and exhibit a pusher–puller trapping asymmetry that short-range swimmer–obstacle repulsion can reverse.

What carries the argument

Two-dimensional force- and torque-free squirmers (disk-shaped Stokes swimmers with surface slip parameter β that distinguishes pushers, neutral swimmers, and pullers) interacting hydrodynamically with randomly placed circular obstacles, solved by a phase-field finite-element method with a short-range hard-wall cutoff δ.

Load-bearing premise

That two-dimensional Stokes disks whose near-wall physics is controlled by a hand-chosen short-range repulsive cutoff, and that lack any rotational noise, already capture the trapping mechanisms that dominate real three-dimensional porous media.

What would settle it

Measure survival or trapping-time distributions for well-characterized pushers versus pullers (for example bacteria and Janus colloids) in the same quasi-two-dimensional disordered obstacle array while systematically varying surface chemistry or gap size; if the pusher–puller asymmetry does not reverse when the effective cutoff changes, or if noise-free hydrodynamics fails to produce the observed hopping rates, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Neutral or weakly active swimmers should explore disordered media by purely hydrodynamically induced reorientation, without needing run-and-tumble or rotational diffusion.
  • Trapping statistics and the direction of the pusher–puller asymmetry can be tuned by surface coatings or gap size that alter the short-range repulsion.
  • Hopping-and-trapping trajectories should appear even for deterministic microswimmers once packing fractions approach the effective percolation threshold.
  • The same hydrodynamic mechanisms that localize single swimmers can be exploited for passive sorting or filtration by obstacle design.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the asymmetry reverses with a few-nanometer change in cutoff, real-world predictions will be limited until the near-field slip and steric law are measured for the specific swimmer–surface pair.
  • Adding even weak rotational noise or shape elongation would likely shorten dynamic-trap lifetimes and shift the packing-fraction window for localization, offering a direct experimental test.
  • The framework suggests that externally imposed heterogeneous flows through the same media could either suppress or amplify the orbital traps, linking the quiescent results to porous-media rheotaxis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies disk-shaped squirmers in two-dimensional disordered porous media of packing fractions ϕ = 0.15 and 0.45, solving the quasi-steady Stokes equations with a phase-field penalization that enforces force- and torque-free conditions and a prescribed tangential slip (Eq. 1). Rotational noise and tumbling are omitted. From ensembles of trajectories the authors report that hydrodynamic scattering off disordered obstacles alone produces long-time diffusion (or super-/sub-diffusion on accessible times) for free agents, while strong pushers and pullers localize either by static geometric trapping or by dynamic quasi-periodic orbits between one or more obstacles. A pusher–puller asymmetry in trapping probability is observed and can reverse when the short-range hard-wall cutoff δ is changed from a/20 to a/4. Transient escape from dynamic traps yields hop-and-trap motion. The phase-field formulation is supported by matched asymptotics and validated against free-space analytics, near-wall velocities of Ishimoto & Crowdy, and single-obstacle orbit phenomenology.

Significance. If the results hold under reasonable variations of the near-field regularization, the work supplies a clean demonstration that deterministic activity–hydrodynamics–disorder coupling is already sufficient for effective diffusion and hop-and-trap localization, without invoking rotational noise. That is a useful baseline for interpreting bacterial and colloidal experiments in porous media and for designing synthetic microswimmers. Strengths include the full hydrodynamic resolution (rather than dry or far-field approximations), the explicit asymptotic recovery of the sharp-interface conditions, and the quantitative validation against known single-body analytics. The reported sensitivity of the pusher–puller asymmetry to short-range repulsion is itself an interesting, falsifiable prediction about near-field physics.

major comments (3)
  1. The headline claim that short-range swimmer–obstacle interactions reverse the pusher–puller trapping asymmetry (abstract; Fig. 3a,d and survival curves) rests on a discontinuous hard-wall cutoff switched between δ = a/20 and a/4 (model section and Appendix). Because Stokes contact is singular and the phase-field already regularizes at scale ξ, this discrete cutoff is an extra modeling choice whose continuum limit is not established. A continuous soft repulsion (or a systematic scan of δ and ξ) is needed to show that the reversal is not an artifact of the particular hard-wall implementation; without it the near-field-sensitivity conclusion remains provisional.
  2. All results are strictly two-dimensional. Gap recirculation, lubrication, and orbital stability differ qualitatively from three dimensions, yet the load-bearing mechanism for both dynamic trapping and the δ-dependent asymmetry is precisely the near-field hydrodynamics. The manuscript should either supply a clear argument why the 2D phenomenology is expected to survive in 3D (or in quasi-2D microfluidic channels) or reframe the claims as 2D-specific, with the 3D extension left as an open question rather than an immediate implication.
  3. Static-trap classification for neutral squirmers (β = 0) is acknowledged to be biased by the finite velocity tolerance tol (Results, “Trapping in dense environments”). Because the paper repeatedly states that neutral agents are the least likely to trap, this numerical bias should be quantified (e.g., by reporting the fraction of “static” neutrals that would scatter under a small orientation perturbation) or the neutral static-trap probability should be set to zero by construction so that the comparison across β remains clean.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and opening sentence: “ofter” → “often”.
  2. Fig. 2: the long-time MSD regimes are explicitly transient; a short statement of the maximum simulation time (in units of τ) would help the reader judge how far from the asymptotic diffusive plateau the data lie.
  3. Notation: the phase-field indicator is called both ϕ and ψ in the Appendix; a single consistent symbol would avoid confusion with the packing fraction ϕ.
  4. Fig. 1 caption and main text: “quasi-periodic” is used for non-closed orbits; a one-sentence clarification that successive revolutions do not close exactly would prevent misreading as true periodic orbits.
  5. References to single-obstacle orbit literature (e.g., Kuron et al., Spagnolie et al.) are appropriate; a brief pointer to any existing 3D porous-media squirmer simulations would strengthen the discussion of dimensionality.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Forward Stokes–squirmer simulations with scanned inputs; no prediction reduces to a fit or self-definitional loop.

full rationale

The paper is a parameter-scan finite-element study of 2D squirmers in disordered obstacle arrays. Free-space speed U = B1/2, Stokes force/torque-free conditions, packing fraction ϕ, squirming parameter β, and hard-wall cutoff δ are prescribed inputs; MSDs, trapping probabilities P(β), survival S(t), and confinement radii are measured outputs of the trajectories. Validation is against independent analytics (free-space stream-function solution; Ishimoto–Crowdy near-wall velocities) and prior single-obstacle phenomenology, not against quantities fitted from the same porous-media runs. Self-citations (dry active porous media, flow at percolation, hydroelastic scattering) supply context or related open questions and do not supply a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the reported diffusion or the reversible pusher–puller asymmetry. Classification thresholds (ρ < a, velocity tolerance) are post-processing conventions, not circular derivations of the transport claims. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed first-principles result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the classical low-Re squirmer Stokes model in 2D, a phase-field penalization of the swimmer, a short-range hard-wall repulsion with two chosen cutoffs, and fixed geometric parameters (R=4a, L=128a, ϕ∈{0.15,0.45}). No new physical entities are postulated. Free parameters are simulation choices that control near-field screening and packing, not fits to experimental transport curves. Domain assumptions (no noise, 2D, disk shape, Stokes) are load-bearing for the ‘deterministic hydrodynamics suffices’ claim.

free parameters (5)
  • short-range cutoff δ = h_cut/a
    Hand-chosen values 1/20 and 1/4 control near-field screening and reverse the pusher–puller trapping asymmetry; not derived from a microscopic contact law.
  • obstacle packing fractions ϕ = 0.15 and 0.45
    Two discrete densities chosen to represent dilute vs dense media; effective packing near percolation is noted but not scanned continuously.
  • squirming parameter set β ∈ {−8,…,8}
    Discrete stresslet strengths scanned to classify regimes; free model inputs, not fitted to data.
  • geometry R=4a, L=128a and phase-field thickness/penalty (ξ, K∼ξ^{-2})
    Fixed numerical and geometric scales that set resolution of near-field hydrodynamics and domain size.
  • velocity tolerance for static-trap classification
    Trajectories terminated when |U| and |ω| fall below tol; authors note this biases neutral static-trapping probability.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Low-Reynolds-number incompressible Stokes flow with force- and torque-free conditions on the swimmer.
    Governing equations (2)–(3); standard microswimmer hydrodynamics.
  • domain assumption Squirmer surface slip u_S = B1(1+β p·n)(nn−I)·p with free-space speed U=B1/2.
    Eq. (1); classical Lighthill–Blake model restricted to first two modes.
  • domain assumption Two-dimensional disk swimmers and circular obstacles; no rotational Brownian motion or run-and-tumble.
    Stated in introduction/model: isolates deterministic hydrodynamics+disorder.
  • standard math Phase-field penalization converges to the sharp-interface Stokes–squirmer problem as ξ→0.
    Appendix matched asymptotics; used to justify the numerical method.
  • ad hoc to paper Short-range hard-wall repulsion prevents overlap and can dominate near-field hydrodynamics.
    Appendix contact algorithm; two cutoffs chosen to probe sensitivity, not derived from a specific surface chemistry.

reviewed 2026-07-14 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Disorder-induced persistent random motion and trapping of microswimmers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7DWMPHI4

@misc{pith2026260321285,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Disorder-induced persistent random motion and trapping of microswimmers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7DWMPHI4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.21285}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Microorganisms ofter move in confined, disordered environments, where hydrodynamic couplings can modify their transport behavior. Using extensive finite-element simulations, we investigate the dynamics of microswimmers -- modeled as squirmers -- in two-dimensional disordered porous media by resolving the full hydrodynamic interactions. We reveal that the deterministic coupling between activity, hydrodynamics, and disorder is sufficient to generate effective diffusive transport. Strong pushers and pullers become localised in the porous medium either by trapping at corners or dynamic trapping, depending on swimmer type and obstacle packing fraction. Squirmers can escape from dynamic traps, leading to a prominent ``hopping-and--trapping'' dynamics. Strikingly, we find a pusher-puller asymmetry in the trapping probability that can be reversed by short-range swimmer-obstacle interactions, highlighting the sensitivity of transport to near-field effects.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Tecon and D

    R. Tecon and D. Or, Biophysical processes supporting the diversity of microbial life in soil, FEMS Microbiology Reviews 41, 599 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    Suarez and A

    S. Suarez and A. A. Pacey, Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract, Human Reproduction Update12, 23 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    J. S. Guasto, R. Rusconi, and R. Stocker, Fluid mechanics of planktonic microorganisms, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 44, 373 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    Y. F. Dufrˆ ene and A. Persat, Mechanomicrobiology: how bacteria sense and respond to forces, Nature Reviews Microbiology 18, 227 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Raina, V

    J.-B. Raina, V. Fernandez, B. Lambert, R. Stocker, and J. R. Seymour, The role of microbial motility and chemotaxis in symbiosis, Nature Reviews Microbiology17, 284 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Erkoc, I

    P. Erkoc, I. C. Yasa, H. Ceylan, O. Yasa, Y. Alapan, and M. Sitti, Mobile microrobots for active therapeutic delivery, Advanced Therapeutics2, 1800064 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Sedighi, A

    M. Sedighi, A. Zahedi Bialvaei, M. R. Hamblin, E. Ohadi, A. Asadi, M. Halajzadeh, V. Lohrasbi, N. Mohammadzadeh, T. Amiriani, M. Krutova,et al., Therapeutic bacteria to combat cancer; current advances, challenges, and opportunities, Cancer Medicine8, 3167 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Gao and J

    W. Gao and J. Wang, The environmental impact of micro/nanomachines: A review, ACS Nano8, 3170 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    J. S. T. Adadevoh, S. Triolo, C. A. Ramsburg, and R. M. Ford, Chemotaxis increases the residence time of bacteria in granular media containing distributed contaminant sources, Environmental Science and Technology50, 181 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Lauga and T

    E. Lauga and T. R. Powers, The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms, Reports on Progress in Physics72, 096601 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    Elgeti, R

    J. Elgeti, R. G. Winkler, and G. Gompper, Physics of microswimmers—single particle motion and collective behavior: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 056601 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 045006 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    S. E. Spagnolie and P. T. Underhill, Swimming in complex fluids, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 381 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Bhattacharjee and S

    T. Bhattacharjee and S. S. Datta, Bacterial hopping and trapping in porous media, Nature Communications10, 2075 (2019)

    2075

  15. [15]

    Sinaasappel, M

    R. Sinaasappel, M. Fazelzadeh, T. Hooijschuur, Q. Di, S. Jabbari-Farouji, and A. Deblais, Locomotion of active polymerlike worms in porous media, Physical Review Letters134, 128303 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    H. Wu, B. Greydanus, and D. K. Schwartz, Mechanisms of transport enhancement for self-propelled nanoswimmers in a porous matrix, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2101807118 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Dehkharghani, N

    A. Dehkharghani, N. Waisbord, and J. S. Guasto, Self-transport of swimming bacteria is impaired by porous microstructure, Communications Physics6, 18 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Cichos, K

    F. Cichos, K. Gustavsson, B. Mehlig, and G. Volpe, Machine learning for active matter, Nature Machine Intelligence2, 94 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    Doostmohammadi, M

    A. Doostmohammadi, M. G. Mazza, T. N. Shendruk, and H. Stark, Editorial: Active and intelligent living matter: from fundamentals to applications, Frontiers in PhysicsVolume 11(2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    L. Yang, J. Jiang, F. Ji, Y. Li, K.-L. Yung, A. Ferreira, and L. Zhang, Machine learning for micro- and nanorobots, Nature Machine Intelligence6, 605 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    V. A. Baulin, A. Giacometti, D. A. Fedosov, S. Ebbens, N. R. Varela-Rosales, N. Feliu, M. Chowdhury, M. Hu, R. F¨ uchslin, M. Dijkstra, M. Mussel, R. v. Roij, D. Xie, V. Tzanov, M. Zu, S. Hidalgo-Caballero, Y. Yuan, L. Cocconi, C.-M. Ghim, C. Cottin-Bizonne, M. Carmen Miguel, M. Jose Esplandiu, J. Simmchen, W. J. Parak, M. Werner, G. Gompper, and M. M. Ha...

    2025

  22. [22]

    L¨ owen and B

    H. L¨ owen and B. Liebchen, Towards intelligent active particles, inArtificial Intelligence and Intelligent Matter: Nanoscience, Soft Matter, Philosophy, edited by M. te Vrugt (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2026) pp. 257–271

    2026

  23. [23]

    Chepizhko and F

    O. Chepizhko and F. Peruani, Diffusion, subdiffusion, and trapping of active particles in heterogeneous media, Physical Review Letters111, 160604 (2013). 9

    2013

  24. [24]

    Bertrand, Y

    T. Bertrand, Y. Zhao, O. B´ enichou, J. Tailleur, and R. Voituriez, Optimized diffusion of run-and-tumble particles in crowded environments, Physical Review Letters120, 198103 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    N. A. Licata, B. Mohari, C. Fuqua, and S. Setayeshgar, Diffusion of bacterial cells in porous media, Biophysical Journal 110, 247 (2016)

    2016

  26. [26]

    Volpe and G

    G. Volpe and G. Volpe, The topography of the environment alters the optimal search strategy for active particles, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America114, 11350 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    Kurzthaler, S

    C. Kurzthaler, S. Mandal, T. Bhattacharjee, G. Frangipane, N. Klongvessa, H. L¨ owen, and G. Volpe, A geometric criterion for the optimal spreading of active polymers in porous media, Nature Communications12, 7088 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. J. Olson Reichhardt, Active matter transport and jamming on disordered landscapes, Physical Review E90, 012701 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    Zeitz, K

    M. Zeitz, K. Wolff, and H. Stark, Active brownian particles moving in a random Lorentz gas, The European Physical Journal E40, 23 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    H. H. Mattingly, Coarse-graining bacterial diffusion in disordered media to surface states, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2407313122 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Lauga, W

    E. Lauga, W. R. DiLuzio, G. M. Whitesides, and H. A. Stone, Swimming in circles: Motion of bacteria near solid boundaries, Biophysical Journal90, 400 (2006)

    2006

  32. [32]

    A. P. Berke, L. Turner, H. C. Berg, and E. Lauga, Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces, Physical Review Letters101, 038102 (2008)

    2008

  33. [33]

    S. E. Spagnolie and E. Lauga, Hydrodynamics of self-propulsion near a boundary: predictions and accuracy of far-field approximations, Journal of Fluid Mechanics700, 105 (2012)

    2012

  34. [34]

    Contino, E

    M. Contino, E. Lushi, I. Tuval, V. Kantsler, and M. Polin, Microalgae scatter off solid surfaces by hydrodynamic and contact forces, Physical Review Letters115, 258102 (2015)

    2015

  35. [35]

    Kantsler, J

    V. Kantsler, J. Dunkel, M. Blayney, and R. E. Goldstein, Ciliary contact interactions dominate surface scattering of swimming eukaryotes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, 1187 (2013)

    2013

  36. [36]

    J. S. Lintuvuori, A. T. Brown, K. Stratford, and D. Marenduzzo, Hydrodynamic oscillations and variable swimming speed in squirmers close to repulsive walls, Soft Matter12, 7959 (2016)

    2016

  37. [37]

    Kuron, P

    M. Kuron, P. St¨ ark, C. Holm, and J. de Graaf, Hydrodynamic mobility reversal of squirmers near flat and curved surfaces, Soft Matter15, 5908 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Junot, Run-to-tumble variability controls the surface residence times of E

    G. Junot, Run-to-tumble variability controls the surface residence times of E. Coli bacteria, Physical Review Letters128, 248101 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Takagi, J

    D. Takagi, J. Palacci, A. B. Braunschweig, M. J. Shelley, and J. Zhang, Hydrodynamic capture of microswimmers into sphere-bound orbits, Soft Matter10, 1784 (2014)

    2014

  40. [40]

    S. E. Spagnolie, G. R. Moreno-Flores, D. Bartolo, and E. Lauga, Geometric capture and escape of a microswimmer colliding with an obstacle, Soft Matter11, 3396 (2015)

    2015

  41. [41]

    Kurzthaler and H

    C. Kurzthaler and H. A. Stone, Microswimmers near corrugated, periodic surfaces, Soft Matter17, 3322 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Garai, U

    S. Garai, U. Makanga, A. Varma, and C. Kurzthaler, Hydroelastic scattering and trapping of microswimmers, Physical Review Research7, L042005 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    M. J. Lighthill, On the squirming motion of nearly spherical deformable bodies through liquids at very small reynolds numbers, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics5, 109 (1952)

    1952

  44. [44]

    J. R. Blake, A spherical envelope approach to ciliary propulsion, Journal of Fluid Mechanics46, 199 (1971)

    1971

  45. [45]

    J. R. Blake, Self-propulsion due to oscillations on the surface of a cylinder at low Reynolds number, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society5, 255 (1971)

    1971

  46. [46]

    Ahana and S

    P. Ahana and S. P. Thampi, Confinement induced trajectory of a squirmer in a two dimensional channel, Fluid Dynamics Research51, 065504 (2019)

    2019

  47. [47]

    C. K. V. S. and S. P. Thampi, Wall-curvature driven dynamics of a microswimmer, Physical Review Fluids6, 083101 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    Li and A

    G. Li and A. M. Ardekani, Hydrodynamic interaction of microswimmers near a wall, Physical Review E83, 046309 (2011)

    2011

  49. [49]

    D. Nie, Y. Ying, G. Guan, J. Lin, and Z. Ouyang, Two-dimensional study on the motion and interactions of squirmers under gravity in a vertical channel, Journal of Fluid Mechanics960, A31 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Ishikawa, M

    T. Ishikawa, M. P. Simmonds, and T. J. Pedley, Hydrodynamic interaction of two swimmers in a viscous fluid, Physical Review Letters93, 124501 (2004)

    2004

  51. [51]

    Ishimoto and E

    K. Ishimoto and E. A. Gaffney, Squirmer dynamics near a boundary, Physical Review E88, 062702 (2013)

    2013

  52. [52]

    Ishimoto and D

    K. Ishimoto and D. G. Crowdy, Dynamics of a treadmilling microswimmer near a no-slip wall in simple shear, Journal of Fluid Mechanics821, 647 (2017)

    2017

  53. [53]

    A. T. Brown, I. D. Vladescu, A. Dawson, T. Vissers, J. Schwarz-Linek, J. S. Lintuvuori, and W. C. K. Poon, Swimming in a crystal, Soft Matter12, 131 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    Chamolly, T

    A. Chamolly, T. Ishikawa, and E. Lauga, Active particles in periodic lattices, New Journal of Physics19, 115001 (2017)

    2017

  55. [55]

    Ishimoto, E

    K. Ishimoto, E. A. Gaffney, and D. J. Smith, Squirmer hydrodynamics near a periodic surface topography, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology11(2023)

    2023

  56. [56]

    Ramprasad, S

    M. Ramprasad, S. Mandal, and P. Sinha Mahapatra, Motion of a microswimmer in a lattice of obstacles: Effect of thermal fluctuations, Physical Review E111, 065402 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    J. J. Molina, Y. Nakayama, and R. Yamamoto, Hydrodynamic interactions of self-propelled swimmers, Soft Matter9, 4923 (2013). 10

    2013

  58. [58]

    Torquato,Random Heterogeneous Materials: Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Vol

    S. Torquato,Random Heterogeneous Materials: Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Vol. 16 (Springer, New York, 2002)

    2002

  59. [59]

    Alk¨ amper, A

    M. Alk¨ amper, A. Dedner, R. Kl¨ ofkorn, and M. Nolte, The dune-alugrid module, Archive of Numerical Software4, 1 (2016)

    2016

  60. [60]

    Vey and A

    S. Vey and A. Voigt, AMDiS: Adaptive MultiDimensional Simulations, Computing and Visualization in Science10, 57 (2007)

    2007

  61. [61]

    Witkowski, S

    T. Witkowski, S. Ling, S. Praetorius, and A. Voigt, Software concepts and numerical algorithms for a scalable adaptive parallel finite element method, Advances in Computational Mathematics41, 1145 (2015)

    2015

  62. [62]

    Engwer, C

    C. Engwer, C. Gr¨ aser, S. M¨ uthing, S. Praetorius, and O. Sander, Concepts for composing finite element function space bases (2025), arXiv:2508.10125 [cs.MS]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Bastian, M

    P. Bastian, M. Blatt, A. Dedner, N.-A. Dreier, C. Engwer, R. Fritze, C. Gr¨ aser, C. Gr¨ uninger, D. Kempf, R. Kl¨ ofkorn, M. Ohlberger, and O. Sander, TheDuneframework: Basic concepts and recent developments, Computers and Mathematics with Applications81, 75 (2021)

    2021

  64. [64]

    AMDiS, Adaptive multi-dimensional simulations,https://gitlab.com/amdis/amdis, v2.11

  65. [65]

    D. Gao, Z. Wang, M. Jain, A. J. T. M. Mathijssen, and R. Tao, Selective trapping of bacteria in porous media by cell length (2025), arXiv:2512.17047 [physics.bio-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    J. D. Wheeler, E. Secchi, R. Rusconi, and R. Stocker, Not just going with the flow: The effects of fluid flow on bacteria and plankton, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology35, 213 (2019)

    2019

  67. [67]

    R. Tao, A. Th´ ery, S. Que, and A. J. T. M. Mathijssen, Invasion of bacteria swimming upstream into microstructured devices, Newton2(2026)

    2026

  68. [68]

    G. Jing, A. Z¨ ottl,´E. Cl´ ement, and A. Lindner, Chirality-induced bacterial rheotaxis in bulk shear flows, Science Advances 6, eabb2012 (2020)

    2020

  69. [69]

    A. J. T. M. Mathijssen, N. Figueroa-Morales, G. Junot, ´E. Cl´ ement, A. Lindner, and A. Z¨ ottl, Oscillatory surface rheotaxis of swimming E. Coli bacteria, Nature Communications10, 3434 (2019)

    2019

  70. [70]

    Peng and J

    Z. Peng and J. F. Brady, Upstream swimming and taylor dispersion of active brownian particles, Physical Review Fluids 5, 073102 (2020)

    2020

  71. [71]

    H. L. Gertack, P. A. Hampshire, C. Wohlgemuth, R. Alert, and S. Aland, Modes of mechanical guidance of adhesion- independent cell migration, Soft Matter22, 907 (2026)

    2026

  72. [72]

    Waisbord, A

    N. Waisbord, A. Dehkharghani, and J. S. Guasto, Fluidic bacterial diodes rectify magnetotactic cell motility in porous environments, Nature Communications12, 5949 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    G. L. Mi˜ no, M. Baabour, R. Chertcoff, G. Gutkind, E. Cl´ ement, H. Auradou, and I. Ippolito, E. Coli accumulation behind an obstacle, Advances in Microbiology08, 451 (2018)

    2018

  74. [74]

    Secchi, A

    E. Secchi, A. Vitale, G. L. Mi˜ no, V. Kantsler, L. Eberl, R. Rusconi, and R. Stocker, The effect of flow on swimming bacteria controls the initial colonization of curved surfaces, Nature Communications11, 2851 (2020)

    2020

  75. [75]

    Residori, S

    M. Residori, S. Mandal, A. Voigt, and C. Kurzthaler, Flow through porous media at the percolation transition, Physical Review Research7, L012032 (2025)

    2025

  76. [76]

    Creppy, E

    A. Creppy, E. Cl´ ement, C. Douarche, M. V. D’Angelo, and H. Auradou, Effect of motility on the transport of bacteria populations through a porous medium, Physical Review Fluids4, 013102 (2019)

    2019

  77. [77]

    P. Das, M. Residori, A. Voigt, S. Mandal, and C. Kurzthaler, Vorticity-induced surfing and trapping in porous media (2025), arXiv:2511.02471 [cond-mat.soft]

    arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Alonso-Matilla, B

    R. Alonso-Matilla, B. Chakrabarti, and D. Saintillan, Transport and dispersion of active particles in periodic porous media, Physical Review Fluids4, 043101 (2019)

    2019

  79. [79]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Reviews of Modern Physics85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  80. [80]

    Z¨ ottl and H

    A. Z¨ ottl and H. Stark, Hydrodynamics determines collective motion and phase behavior of active colloids in quasi-two- dimensional confinement, Physical Review Letters112, 118101 (2014)

    2014

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.5 on July 14, 2026.