arxiv: 2603.22381 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-23 · ✦ hep-ph · gr-qc· hep-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

CPT Violation, Mirror World and Implications for Baryon Asymmetry

M. M. Chaichian , M. Gogberashvili , M. N. Mnatsakanova , T. Tsiskaridze

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph gr-qchep-th

keywords CPT violationmirror universebaryon asymmetryinflaton fieldreheatingmatter antimatter asymmetry

0 comments

The pith

Local CPT violation in mirror-universe pairs splits inflaton masses and generates baryon asymmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that the universe and its mirror counterpart form as coordinate-reversed pairs, creating a globally CPT-symmetric setup while allowing local CPT violations in each. This leads to a mass difference between the inflaton and anti-inflaton fields in each universe. The mass asymmetry changes the reheating temperatures after inflation, which in turn produces the observed matter-antimatter imbalance in both the visible and mirror worlds. A reader would care because it provides a geometric basis for time reversal and ties CPT breaking directly to the origin of matter without additional mechanisms.

Core claim

The Universe is created as a pair of coordinate-reversed counterparts that form a globally CPT-symmetric system permitting local CPT violations within each sector. Local CPT violation induces a mass difference between the real inflaton and anti-inflaton fields, modifying reheating temperatures and naturally generating the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry in both universes.

What carries the argument

Coordinate-reversed mirror universe pair with local CPT violation that induces mass splitting between inflaton and anti-inflaton fields.

If this is right

The baryon asymmetry arises from the difference in reheating temperatures caused by the inflaton mass split.
Both the visible universe and its mirror counterpart develop matter dominance through the same process.
The model interprets time reversal geometrically via reversed microscopic time coordinates without needing initial-final state interchange.
Mirror sectors have opposite chiralities due to the coordinate reversal.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the inflaton mass difference is measurable, it could lead to specific predictions for the ratio of baryon densities in the two universes.
This framework might connect to searches for mirror matter through cosmic observations or collider experiments.
Extensions could explore how the global CPT symmetry constrains other particle physics parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The universe originates as a pair of coordinate-reversed counterparts that together maintain global CPT symmetry while allowing local violations in each sector.

What would settle it

Finding no inflaton mass difference or identical reheating temperatures between the visible and mirror sectors would contradict the local CPT violation mechanism.

read the original abstract

We propose a novel model in which the Universe is created as a pair of coordinate-reversed counterparts, forming a globally CPT-symmetric system that permits local CPT violations within each sector. This framework naturally introduces a mirror universe with opposite chiralities and reversed microscopic time coordinates, providing a geometric interpretation of time reversal without relying on initial-final state interchange. We investigate the consequences of local CPT violation in each universe, which induces a mass difference between the real inflaton and anti-inflaton fields. Such an asymmetry can modify reheating temperatures and naturally generate the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry in both universes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sketches a mirror-universe model with coordinate reversal to induce an inflaton mass split and drive baryon asymmetry, but the step from geometry to that split is not derived explicitly.

read the letter

The core proposal is that the universe comes in a pair of coordinate-reversed sectors that are globally CPT symmetric yet allow local violations inside each one. This setup is meant to give a geometric reading of time reversal and to split the masses of the inflaton and anti-inflaton, which then changes reheating temperatures and produces the observed matter-antimatter imbalance in both sectors. The new element is the direct tie between the reversed-coordinate construction and an inflaton mass difference that feeds into baryon asymmetry; earlier mirror-world papers exist, but this specific linkage is not standard. The geometric framing of time reversal without initial-final state exchange is a clean way to present the idea and avoids some usual hand-waving about CPT. The main weakness is that the abstract and the central claim do not supply the field-theoretic step showing how the coordinate reversal operator actually produces a nonzero mass difference between the inflaton doublet and its counterpart. Without a Lagrangian, metric transformation, or effective potential that demonstrates the splitting follows from the geometry rather than being inserted by hand, the reheating and asymmetry arguments stay at the level of a sketch. The free parameter for the mass difference is listed openly, which is honest, but it also means the mechanism reduces to an assumption until that derivation appears. This is the sort of paper that belongs in a reading group for people who follow alternative cosmologies and CPT-violation models in hep-ph. It is not yet solid enough for direct citation, but the idea is coherent on its own terms and deserves a serious referee to check whether the mass-splitting step can be made explicit. I would send it to peer review rather than desk-reject it.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a model in which the Universe originates as a pair of coordinate-reversed counterparts, establishing global CPT symmetry while allowing local CPT violations in each sector. This construction introduces a mirror universe featuring opposite chiralities and reversed microscopic time coordinates. Local CPT violation is argued to induce a mass difference between the inflaton and anti-inflaton fields, which in turn modifies reheating temperatures and accounts for the observed baryon asymmetry in both universes.

Significance. If the derivation of the mass splitting from the geometric construction is made explicit and the resulting asymmetry is shown to match observations quantitatively, this work could offer a novel geometric explanation for baryon asymmetry linked to CPT violation and mirror worlds. It avoids reliance on initial-final state interchange for time reversal and provides a framework that naturally incorporates local violations.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] The assertion that local CPT violation induces a mass difference between the real inflaton and anti-inflaton fields is not accompanied by an explicit field-theoretic derivation. The manuscript does not provide the Lagrangian, the action of the coordinate reversal on the inflaton doublet, or the resulting effective potential that would demonstrate a nonzero splitting m_φ ≠ m_φ-bar. This omission is critical because the subsequent claims regarding modified reheating temperatures and the generation of matter-antimatter asymmetry rest directly on this mass difference.

minor comments (1)

The abstract would benefit from including at least one quantitative estimate, such as the order of magnitude of the induced mass difference or the resulting baryon-to-photon ratio, to strengthen the presentation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting this important point. We agree that an explicit derivation is necessary to support the central claims and will revise the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] The assertion that local CPT violation induces a mass difference between the real inflaton and anti-inflaton fields is not accompanied by an explicit field-theoretic derivation. The manuscript does not provide the Lagrangian, the action of the coordinate reversal on the inflaton doublet, or the resulting effective potential that would demonstrate a nonzero splitting m_φ ≠ m_φ-bar. This omission is critical because the subsequent claims regarding modified reheating temperatures and the generation of matter-antimatter asymmetry rest directly on this mass difference.

Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this criticism. The present version of the manuscript states the existence of the mass splitting but does not supply the required field-theoretic derivation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection that (i) writes the explicit Lagrangian for the inflaton doublet in the paired-universe geometry, (ii) defines the action of the coordinate-reversal operator on the doublet, and (iii) derives the resulting effective potential, thereby demonstrating m_φ ≠ m_φ-bar at tree level from the local CPT violation. This addition will make the link to the modified reheating temperatures and the baryon asymmetry fully explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Mass difference between inflaton and anti-inflaton presented as induced consequence but reduces to defining assumption of the coordinate-reversal model

specific steps

self definitional [Abstract]
"We investigate the consequences of local CPT violation in each universe, which induces a mass difference between the real inflaton and anti-inflaton fields. Such an asymmetry can modify reheating temperatures and naturally generate the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry in both universes."

The coordinate-reversed counterpart construction is defined to permit local CPT violations; the mass difference is then asserted as a direct consequence of those violations. Because no explicit operator action, field transformation, or potential term is exhibited that forces m_φ ≠ m_φ-bar from the geometry alone, the splitting functions as an input assumption of the model rather than an output of the derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central chain begins with the geometric premise of coordinate-reversed mirror universes that form a globally CPT-symmetric system while allowing local CPT violations. This premise is then said to induce a specific mass splitting between inflaton and anti-inflaton fields, which in turn modifies reheating and generates baryon asymmetry. The abstract states the induction directly but supplies no Lagrangian, metric transformation, or effective-potential calculation showing how the reversal operator produces a nonzero splitting; the asymmetry is therefore introduced by the model's initial construction rather than derived from it. No self-citations, fitted parameters, or renamed empirical results appear in the given text, so the circularity is limited to this single self-definitional step at the foundation of the claimed predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on a global CPT symmetry assumption and introduces a mirror sector without independent evidence; the inflaton mass splitting functions as a free parameter whose value is chosen to match the observed asymmetry.

free parameters (1)

inflaton anti-inflaton mass difference
Introduced to produce the required reheating asymmetry; its magnitude is not derived from the coordinate reversal alone.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The paired sectors form a globally CPT-symmetric system
Invoked to allow local violations while preserving overall symmetry.

invented entities (1)

mirror universe with reversed microscopic time coordinates no independent evidence
purpose: Provides geometric time reversal and permits local CPT violation
Postulated without external falsifiable signature beyond the asymmetry itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5414 in / 1233 out tokens · 40442 ms · 2026-05-15T00:45:17.703693+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Universe created as pair of coordinate-reversed counterparts... local CPT violations... mass difference between real inflaton and anti-inflaton fields

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

[1]

V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, Quantum Electrodynamics: Vol. 4 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford U.K. 1996)

work page 1996
[2]

CPT symmetry and its violation,

R. Lehnert, “CPT symmetry and its violation,” Symmetry 8 (2016) 114, doi: 10.3390/sym8110114

work page doi:10.3390/sym8110114 2016
[3]

Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Vol

S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields: Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge U.K. 1995)

work page 1995
[4]

R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press: Chicago 1984. 13

work page 1984
[5]

C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco 1973)

work page 1973
[6]

CP Invariance and the shadow univ erse,

K. Nishijima and M. H. Saﬀouri, “CP Invariance and the shadow univ erse,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 (1965) 205, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.205

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.14.205 1965
[7]

Mirror particles and mirror matter: 50 years of spe culations and search,

L. B. Okun, “Mirror particles and mirror matter: 50 years of spe culations and search,” Phys. Usp. 50 (2007) 380, doi: 10.1070/PU2007v050n04ABEH006227 [arXiv: hep - ph/0606202]

work page doi:10.1070/pu2007v050n04abeh006227 2007
[8]

Mirror world and its cosmological consequences,

Z. Berezhiani, “Mirror world and its cosmological consequences,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 (2004) 3775, doi: 10.1142/S0217751X04020075 [arXiv: hep-ph/0 312335]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x04020075 2004
[9]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

N. Aghanim et al. [Planck], “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astr on. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652 (2021) C4], doi: 10.1051/0004- 6361/201833910 [arXiv: 1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004- 2018
[10]

The origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry

M. Dine and A. Kusenko, “The Origin of the matter - antimatter a symmetry,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 (2003) 1, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1 [arXiv: hep-ph/0303065]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.1 2003
[11]

Recent progress in baryogenesis,

A. Riotto and M. Trodden, “Recent progress in baryogenesis,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 49 (1999) 35, doi: 10.1146/annurev.nucl.49.1.35 [arXiv: hep-ph/99013 62 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.49.1.35 1999
[12]

CPT violation and particle-antiparticle asymmetry in cosmology

A. D. Dolgov, “CPT violation and particle-antiparticle asymmetry in cosmology,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 73 (2010) 588, doi: 10.1134/S1063778810040022 [arXiv: 0903.4318 [h ep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1134/s1063778810040022 2010
[13]

CPT Violation and Decoherence in Quantum Gravity

N. E. Mavromatos, “CPT violation and decoherence in quantum g ravity,” Lect. Notes Phys. 669 (2005) 245, doi: 10.1007/11377306 8 [arXiv: gr-qc/0407005 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/11377306 2005
[14]

Quantum gravity eﬀects in particle physics and co smology,

V. A. Kuzmin, “Quantum gravity eﬀects in particle physics and co smology,” in: Proc. III Seminar on Quantum Gravity (Moscow, 1984); Preprint NORDITA-85/4

work page 1984
[15]

BARYON AND TIME ASYMMETRIES OF THE UNIVERSE

A. Barnaveli and M. Gogberashvili, “Baryon and time asymmetrie s of the Universe,” [arXiv: hep-ph/9505413]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[16]

Cosmological ’arrow of time’ and baryon asymmetry of the Universe,

A. Barnaveli and M. Gogberashvili, “Cosmological ’arrow of time’ and baryon asymmetry of the Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 316 (1993) 57, doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(93)90657-4

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90657-4 1993
[17]

Reciprocal of the CPT theorem,

L. ´Alvarez-Gaum´ e, M. M. Chaichian, M. A. Oksanen and A. Tureanu, “ Reciprocal of the CPT theorem,” Phys. Lett. B 850 (2024) 138483, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138483 [arXiv: 2310.16008 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138483 2024
[18]

External Inversion, Internal Inversion, and Reflection Invariance

M. Pavsic, “External inversion, internal inversion, and reﬂec tion invariance,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 9 (1974) 229, doi: 10.1007/BF01810695 [arXiv: hep-ph/0105344]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/bf01810695 1974
[19]

On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equ ilibrium,

E. Wigner, “On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equ ilibrium,” Phys. Rev. 40 (1932) 749, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.40.749

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.40.749 1932
[20]

On possible eﬀects of mirror p articles,

S. I. Blinnikov and M. Yu. Khlopov, “On possible eﬀects of mirror p articles,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 36 (1982) 472. 14

work page 1982
[21]

On possible astronomical eﬀe cts of mirror particles,

S. I. Blinnikov and M. Yu. Khlopov, “On possible astronomical eﬀe cts of mirror particles,” Sov. Astron. 27 (1983) 355

work page 1983
[22]

Observational physics of mirror world,

M. Yu. Khlopov, G. M. Beskin, N. G. Bochkarev, L. A. Pustilnik an d S. A. Pustilnik, “Observational physics of mirror world,” Sov. Astron. 69 (1991) 21

work page 1991
[23]

CPT-Symmetric Universe

L. Boyle, K. Finn and N. Turok, “CPT-symmetric Universe,” Phys . Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 251301, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.251301 [arXiv: 1803.08928 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.251301 2018
[24]

Time reversal symmetry in cosmology an d the quantum creation of Universes,

S. J. Robles-P´ erez, “Time reversal symmetry in cosmology an d the quantum creation of Universes,” Universe 5 (2019) 150, doi: 10.3390/universe5060150 [arXiv: 1901.03387 [gr- qc]]

work page doi:10.3390/universe5060150 2019
[25]

Comment to the CPT-symmetric Universe: Two po ssible extensions,

G. E. Volovik, “Comment to the CPT-symmetric Universe: Two po ssible extensions,” JETP Lett. 109 (2019) 682, doi: 10.1134/S0021364019100023 [arXiv: 1902.07584 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1134/s0021364019100023 2019
[26]

Al- ternative interpretation of relativistic time-reversal and the time arrow,

T. Zalialiutdinov, D. Solovyev, D. Chubukov, S. Chekhovskoi an d L. Labzowsky, “Al- ternative interpretation of relativistic time-reversal and the time arrow,” Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (2022) L022052, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L022052 [arXiv : 2205.13417 [physics.gen-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.l022052 2022
[27]

Torretti, Relativity and Geometry (Dover, NY 1996)

R. Torretti, Relativity and Geometry (Dover, NY 1996)

work page 1996
[28]

Validity of the Einstein hole argument,

D. J. Oliver, “Validity of the Einstein hole argument,” Stud. Hist. P hilos. Sci. Part B: Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 68 (2019) 62, doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.008 [arXiv: 1907.01614 [physics.hist-ph]

work page doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.008 2019
[29]

Einstein’s hole argument and Schwarzschild sin gularities,

M. Gogberashvili, “Einstein’s hole argument and Schwarzschild sin gularities,” Annals Phys. 452 (2023) 169274, doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2023.169274 [arXiv: 2303.10348 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2023.169274 2023
[30]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in the Curved Space-time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1982)

work page 1982
[31]

Mirror dark matter: Cosmology, galaxy structure a nd direct detection,

R. Foot, “Mirror dark matter: Cosmology, galaxy structure a nd direct detection,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1430013, doi: 10.1142/S0217751X14300130 [arXiv: 1401.3 965 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x14300130 2014
[32]

Through the Looking-Glass: Alice's Adventures in Mirror World

Z. Berezhiani, “Through the looking-glass: Alice’s adventures in mirror world,” doi: 10.1142/9789812775344 0055 [arXiv: hep-ph/0508233]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789812775344
[33]

On the accelerated expansion of the Universe,

N. Kumar, “On the accelerated expansion of the Universe,” Gra v. Cosmol. 30 (2024) 85, doi: 10.1134/S0202289324010080 [arXiv: 2406.04392 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1134/s0202289324010080 2024
[34]

Dark Energy from Entan glements with Mirror Uni- verse,

M. Gogberashvili and T. Tsiskaridze, “Dark Energy from Entan glements with Mirror Uni- verse,” Physics 8 (2026) 29, doi: 10.3390/physics8010029 [arXiv: 2603.03385 [gr-qc ]]

work page doi:10.3390/physics8010029 2026
[35]

Towards the th eory of reheating after inﬂation,

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Towards the th eory of reheating after inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 3258, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3258 [arXiv: hep- ph/9704452]. 15

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.56.3258 1997
[36]

Reheating in inﬂationary cosmology: Theory and applications,

R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F. Y. Cyr-Racine and A. Mazu mdar, “Reheating in inﬂationary cosmology: Theory and applications,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Pa rt. Sci. 60 (2010) 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev.nucl.012809.104511 [arXiv: 1001.2600 [hep -th]]

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.012809.104511 2010
[37]

Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review

M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser and J. Karouby, “Non perturbative dynamics of reheating after inﬂation: A review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2014) 1530003, doi: 10.1142/S0218271815300037 [arXiv: 1410.3808 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271815300037 2014
[38]

Implications of time- dependent inﬂaton de- cay on reheating and dark matter production,

A. Ahmed, B. Grzadkowski and A. Socha, “Implications of time- dependent inﬂaton de- cay on reheating and dark matter production,” Phys. Lett. B 831 (2022) 137201, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137201 [arXiv: 2111.06065 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137201 2022
[39]

The Early Mirror Universe: Inflation, Baryogenesis, Nucleosynthesis and Dark Matter

Z. Berezhiani, D. Comelli and F. L. Villante, “The Early mirror unive rse: Inﬂation, baryogenesis, nucleosynthesis and dark matter,” Phys. Lett. B 503 (2001) 362, doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00217-9 [arXiv: hep-ph/0008105 [hep- ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(01)00217-9 2001
[40]

Pollock, César Rodríguez-Rosario, Thomas Frauenheim, Mauro Paternos- tro, and Kavan Modi

J. A. Harvey and M. S. Turner, “Cosmological baryon and lepto n number in the presence of electroweak fermion number violation,” Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3344, doi: 10.1103/Phys- RevD.42.3344

work page doi:10.1103/phys- 1990
[41]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, “Dimens ion-six terms in the Standard Model lagrangian,” JHEP 10 (2010) 085, doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2010)085 [arXiv: 1008.4884 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2010)085 2010
[42]

The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton

F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, “The Standard Model Hig gs boson as the inﬂaton,” Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 703, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.072 [arXiv: 0710.3755 [h ep- th]]. 16

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.072 2008