Pith.

Instrumentation and Detectors · arXiv:2603.23691 v2 · submitted 24 Mar 2026

Long-term scintillation light performance, calibrations, and triggering efficiency in the MicroBooNE detector

MicroBooNE collaboration: P. Abratenko, D. Andrade Aldana, L. Arellano, J. Asaadi, A. Ashkenazi, S. Balasubramanian, B. Baller, A. Barnard

show 185 more authors

G. Barr, D. Barrow, J. Barrow, V. Basque, J. Bateman, B. Behera, O. Benevides Rodrigues, S. Berkman, A. Bhat, M. Bhattacharya, V. Bhelande, A. Binau, M. Bishai, A. Blake, B. Bogart, T. Bolton, M.B. Brunetti, L. Camilleri, D. Caratelli, F. Cavanna, G. Cerati, A. Chappell, Y. Chen, J.M. Conrad, M. Convery, L. Cooper-Troendle, J.I. Crespo-Anadon, R. Cross, M. Del Tutto, S.R. Dennis, P. Detje, R. Diurba, Z. Djurcic, K. Duffy, S. Dytman, B. Eberly, P. Englezos, A. Ereditato, J.J. Evans, C. Fang, B.T. Fleming, W. Foreman, D. Franco, A.P. Furmanski, F. Gao, D. Garcia-Gamez, S. Gardiner, G. Ge, S. Gollapinni, E. Gramellini, P. Green, H. Greenlee, L. Gu, W. Gu, R. Guenette, L. Hagaman, M. D. Handley, O. Hen, A. Hergenhan, M. Harrison, S. Hawkins, C. Hilgenberg, G.A. Horton-Smith, A. Hussain, B. Irwin, M.S. Ismail, C. James, X. Ji, J.H. Jo, A. Johnson, R.A. Johnson, D. Kalra, G. Karagiorgi, W. Ketchum, A. Kelly, M. Kirby, T. Kobilarcik, K. Kumar, N. Lane, J.-Y. Li, Y. Li, K. Lin, B.R. Littlejohn, L. Liu, S. Liu, W.C. Louis, X. Luo, T. Mahmud, N. Majeed, C. Mariani, J. Marshall, D.A. Martinez Caicedo, F. Martinez Lopez, M. G. Manuel Alves, S. Martynenko, A. Mastbaum, I. Mawby, N. McConkey, B. McConnell, L. Mellet, J. Mendez, J. Micallef, T. Mohayai, A. Mogan, M. Mooney, A.F. Moor, C.D. Moore, L. Mora Lepin, M. A. Hernandez Morquecho, M.M. Moudgalya, S. Mulleria Babu, D. Naples, A. Navrer-Agasson, N. Nayak, M. Nebot-Guinot, C. Nguyen, L. Nguyen, J. Nowak, N. Oza, O. Palamara, N. Pallat, V. Paolone, A. Papadopoulou, V. Papavassiliou, H. Parkinson, S.F. Pate, N. Patel, Z. Pavlovic, E. Piasetzky, K. Pletcher, I. Pophale, X. Qian, J.L. Raaf, V. Radeka, A. Rafique, R. Raymond, M. Reggiani-Guzzo, J. Rodriguez Rondon, M. Rosenberg, M. Ross-Lonergan, I. Safa, C. Sauer, D.W. Schmitz, A. Schukraft, W. Seligman, M.H. Shaevitz, R. Sharankova, J. Shi, L. Silva, E.L. Snider, S. Soldner-Rembold, J. Spitz, M. Stancari, J. St. John, T. Strauss, A.M. Szelc, N. Taniuchi, K. Terao, C.Thorpe, D. Torbunov, D. Totani, M. Toups, A. Trettin, Y.-T. Tsai, J. Tyler, M.A. Uchida, T. Usher, B. Viren, J. Wang, L. Wang, M. Weber, H. Wei, A.J. White, S. Wolbers, T. Wongjirad, K. Wresilo, W. Wu, E. Yandel, T. Yang, L.E. Yates, H.W. Yu, G.P. Zeller, J. Zennamo, C. Zhang, Y. Zhang

The paper says

“Together, the results presented in this article provide an important benchmark for the long-term performance of scintillation light systems in LArTPCs and their use in particle physics measurements.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

A detailed understanding of scintillation light in liquid argon time projection chambers (LArTPCs) is essential for the robust extraction of physics measurements from their data. This article presents the long-term performance of scintillation light production and detection using five years of data from the MicroBooNE LArTPC neutrino detector. We describe the MicroBooNE light simulation and light-based triggering schemes, and present the photomultiplier tube gain calibration and stability, light response stability, and light-based systematic uncertainties over the course of five years of data collection. We also make an in-situ measurement of the scintillation light triggering efficiency down to 30 MeV of visible energy. Finally, we discuss two notable observations in MicroBooNE's data, both reported here for the first time: an approximately 50% decline in MicroBooNE's light yield over time, concentrated in the first two years of running; and a higher than expected O(200 kHz) rate of single photoelectrons (SPE). We present the first measurements of the dependence of the SPE rate on the TPC electric field strength and polarity. Together, the results presented in this article provide an important benchmark for the long-term performance of scintillation light systems in LArTPCs and their use in particle physics measurements.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-10-30 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.99

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.78 · states limitation 0.38 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.19 · mentions code or data availability 0.03

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
A detailed understanding of scintillation light in liquid argon time projection chambers (LArTPCs) is essential for the robust extraction of physics measurements from their data. background 1.00 0.05 0.04 asserted 1.00
This article presents the long-term performance of scintillation light production and detection using five years of data from the MicroBooNE LArTPC neutrino detector. contribution 0.99 0.90 0.07 asserted 0.99
We describe the MicroBooNE light simulation and light-based triggering schemes, and present the photomultiplier tube gain calibration and stability, light response stability, and light-based systematic uncertainties over the course of five years of data collection. contribution 0.70 0.93 0.07 asserted 0.98
We also make an in-situ measurement of the scintillation light triggering efficiency down to 30 MeV of visible energy. result 0.58 0.97 0.06 asserted 1.00
Finally, we discuss two notable observations in MicroBooNE's data, both reported here for the first time: an approximately 50\% decline in MicroBooNE's light yield over time, concentrated in the first two years of running; and a higher than expected O(200 kHz) rate of single photoelectrons (SPE). result 0.95 0.95 0.16 asserted 1.00
We present the first measurements of the dependence of the SPE rate on the TPC electric field strength and polarity. result 0.58 0.96 0.07 asserted 1.00
Together, the results presented in this article provide an important benchmark for the long-term performance of scintillation light systems in LArTPCs and their use in particle physics measurements. interpretation 0.99 0.56 0.71 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.53

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-30: 1 request, 5,811 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Uses its method or tool 2 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment