arxiv: 2603.26167 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-27 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.CR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Gaussian Shannon: High-Precision Diffusion Model Watermarking Based on Communication

Yi Zhang , Hongbo Huang , Liang-Jie Zhang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 23:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.CR

keywords diffusion model watermarkingcommunication channel modelerror correcting codesgaussian noise embeddingbit exact recoverystable diffusionrobust tracingai content authentication

0 comments

The pith

Treating diffusion generation as a noisy communication channel enables exact bit recovery of watermarks embedded in initial Gaussian noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to move beyond fuzzy, threshold-based detection in diffusion-model watermarking to support exact recovery of structured bit payloads. It models the full diffusion pipeline as a communication channel subject to local bit flips and global stochastic distortions. By placing the watermark in the starting Gaussian noise and applying cascaded error-correcting codes plus majority voting, the approach transmits semantic data end-to-end without fine-tuning or perceptible quality loss. This matters for applications that need precise metadata, such as licensing instructions or offline verification, which fuzzy matching cannot supply. Experiments on three Stable Diffusion variants and seven perturbation types report state-of-the-art bit accuracy alongside high true-positive rates.

Core claim

Gaussian Shannon embeds watermarks directly in the initial Gaussian noise of diffusion models and treats the subsequent generation steps as a noisy channel. It counters local bit flips with error-correcting codes and global stochastic distortions with majority voting, thereby achieving reliable end-to-end transmission of semantic payloads with high bit-level accuracy and no detectable quality degradation.

What carries the argument

The cascaded defense of error-correcting codes for local flips combined with majority voting for global distortions, applied to watermarks placed in the starting noise.

If this is right

Rights attribution can carry exact licensing instructions or other structured metadata rather than mere presence flags.
Watermarking works without model fine-tuning or post-processing steps that affect visual quality.
The same embedding and recovery pipeline applies across multiple Stable Diffusion variants and common real-world perturbations.
Offline verification becomes feasible because the full payload can be decoded exactly from the generated image.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The channel-modeling approach may generalize to other generative families whose sampling steps introduce comparable noise patterns.
Optimizing the specific error-correcting codes for different diffusion schedulers could further raise accuracy under heavy perturbations.
Deployment at scale would allow regulators to require traceable metadata in AI content without retraining every model.
Testing the method on non-diffusion generators such as GANs would clarify whether the local-flip-plus-global-distortion model is diffusion-specific.

Load-bearing premise

The diffusion process behaves like a communication channel whose only significant interference consists of local bit flips and global stochastic distortions that the chosen error-correction scheme can correct without introducing quality loss.

What would settle it

A controlled test in which bit-recovery accuracy drops below 90 percent on any of the reported perturbation types while measured image quality metrics remain unchanged would falsify the claim of reliable end-to-end transmission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.26167 by Hongbo Huang, Liang-Jie Zhang, Yi Zhang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Comparison of Watermark Types. ID-based watermarks require an online connection to query a database for copyright information, whereas analytical watermarks can be directly decoded and interpreted without external resources. For example, a watermark in a digital work can contain structured data such as licensor, licensee, timestamp, and permission flags. dissemination of disinformation to the generation … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Modeling Watermarking as a Communication Process.The embedding and extraction of watermark information can be formulated as the transmission and reception of messages through a noisy channel. This perspective enables the application of established communication-theoretic techniques to enhance the reliability and fidelity of watermark recovery. Admittedly, current watermark detection mechanisms based on thr… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Overview of the Gaussian Shannon framework. The watermark bitstream w is first encoded via LDPC into a codeword c, which is then expanded to match the latent space dimension to yield cR. A pseudo-random modulation produces the signal s, which guides the sampling of the initial Gaussian noise zT . The diffusion model subsequently denoises zT to generate the watermarked image. During extraction, the process … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Error bits(dark) in the latent variable. (a) Local errors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Watermarked images under different noises or attacks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Experimental results under different intensities of 7 types of noise, with the last one being the results under different guidance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Diffusion models generate high-quality images but pose serious risks like copyright violation and disinformation. Watermarking is a key defense for tracing and authenticating AI-generated content. However, existing methods rely on threshold-based detection, which only supports fuzzy matching and cannot recover structured watermark data bit-exactly, making them unsuitable for offline verification or applications requiring lossless metadata (e.g., licensing instructions). To address this problem, in this paper, we propose Gaussian Shannon, a watermarking framework that treats the diffusion process as a noisy communication channel and enables both robust tracing and exact bit recovery. Our method embeds watermarks in the initial Gaussian noise without fine-tuning or quality loss. We identify two types of channel interference, namely local bit flips and global stochastic distortions, and design a cascaded defense combining error-correcting codes and majority voting. This ensures reliable end-to-end transmission of semantic payloads. Experiments across three Stable Diffusion variants and seven perturbation types show that Gaussian Shannon achieves state-of-the-art bit-level accuracy while maintaining a high true positive rate, enabling trustworthy rights attribution in real-world deployment. The source code have been made available at: https://github.com/Rambo-Yi/Gaussian-Shannon

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Gaussian Shannon embeds watermarks in initial noise with cascaded ECC and voting for exact bit recovery, but the diffusion channel model lacks independent validation.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper treats the diffusion process as a communication channel and embeds watermarks in the initial Gaussian noise to achieve exact bit recovery of structured payloads. It combines error-correcting codes with majority voting to handle local flips and global distortions, which moves beyond the usual threshold-based detection in prior work. The experiments report strong bit accuracy on three Stable Diffusion variants across seven perturbation types, and the authors released code, which helps reproducibility. That part is useful for anyone needing reliable metadata transport in generated images rather than just fuzzy detection. The approach avoids fine-tuning and claims no quality loss, which is a practical plus if the numbers hold. The soft spots center on the channel model. The paper does not derive the interference types from the diffusion SDE or provide empirical bit-error statistics from the latent space itself. Validation stays limited to the seven tested perturbations, so it is unclear how the method behaves under correlated or non-local errors that might appear in real deployments. The abstract also omits error bars, ablation details on the ECC parameters, and direct comparisons that would show how much the cascaded defense actually contributes. These gaps make the SOTA claim harder to assess without the full tables. This work is aimed at researchers focused on AI content authentication and copyright enforcement. A reader already working on diffusion watermarking or communication-inspired defenses would get concrete ideas and baseline numbers to build on. It deserves peer review because the core technique is grounded in standard tools and the reported results suggest a clear step forward, even if the noise characterization needs more rigor to support the generalization claims.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Gaussian Shannon, a watermarking framework for diffusion models that treats the diffusion process as a noisy communication channel. Watermarks are embedded directly into the initial Gaussian noise (without fine-tuning) and protected by a cascaded error-correcting code plus majority-voting scheme designed to correct local bit flips and global stochastic distortions, enabling exact bit recovery of structured payloads. Experiments on three Stable Diffusion variants across seven perturbation types report state-of-the-art bit-level accuracy and high true-positive rates for rights attribution.

Significance. If the channel model holds, the work offers a meaningful advance over threshold-based detectors by supporting lossless metadata recovery, which is valuable for licensing, provenance, and offline verification. The public release of source code strengthens reproducibility.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (channel model): the claim that diffusion interference consists only of local bit flips and global stochastic distortions is not derived from the diffusion SDE nor supported by independent empirical bit-error statistics measured on the initial Gaussian latent; validation is performed solely on the seven listed perturbations, so the cascaded ECC + majority-voting construction may fail to generalize if correlated or non-local errors are present.
[§4] §4 (experiments): the reported SOTA bit accuracies lack error bars, statistical significance tests, or ablation results on the ECC parameters and voting window size; without these, it is impossible to assess whether the performance numbers are robust or merely tuned to the specific test set.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: grammatical error in the final sentence ('The source code have been made available' should read 'has been made available').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recommendation for major revision. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the changes we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (channel model): the claim that diffusion interference consists only of local bit flips and global stochastic distortions is not derived from the diffusion SDE nor supported by independent empirical bit-error statistics measured on the initial Gaussian latent; validation is performed solely on the seven listed perturbations, so the cascaded ECC + majority-voting construction may fail to generalize if correlated or non-local errors are present.

Authors: We acknowledge that the channel model presented in §3 is an empirical abstraction derived from observed bit-error patterns under the seven perturbation types rather than a formal derivation from the diffusion SDE. The identification of local bit flips and global stochastic distortions was based on direct measurement of watermark bit errors in the initial Gaussian latent across those perturbations. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection with independent empirical bit-error statistics computed on the initial latent (including per-step and per-perturbation histograms) and a brief discussion of the model’s limitations with respect to possible correlated or non-local errors. We maintain that the cascaded ECC plus majority-voting construction is well-matched to the observed error classes, but we will explicitly note that broader generalization claims would require additional perturbation families. revision: partial
Referee: [§4] §4 (experiments): the reported SOTA bit accuracies lack error bars, statistical significance tests, or ablation results on the ECC parameters and voting window size; without these, it is impossible to assess whether the performance numbers are robust or merely tuned to the specific test set.

Authors: We agree that the experimental section would be strengthened by statistical rigor. In the revision we will (i) report all bit-accuracy figures with error bars (standard deviation over five independent runs), (ii) include paired statistical significance tests against the strongest baselines, and (iii) add ablation tables varying the ECC code rate, block length, and majority-voting window size. These additions will demonstrate that the reported performance is not an artifact of a single hyper-parameter setting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper models the diffusion process as a noisy communication channel with two identified interference types (local bit flips and global stochastic distortions) corrected via standard cascaded ECC plus majority voting. No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations in the abstract or described method reduce the reported bit-level accuracy or true-positive rates to quantities defined by the authors' own inputs. The watermark embedding occurs in initial Gaussian noise without fine-tuning, and performance is validated empirically across three Stable Diffusion variants and seven perturbations rather than by construction. The central claims remain independent of any self-referential loop, consistent with the reader's assessment of score 2.0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that diffusion generation behaves as a well-characterized noisy channel whose dominant errors are local bit flips and global distortions correctable by standard ECC and voting; no new physical entities or ad-hoc constants are introduced.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Diffusion sampling can be treated as a memoryless noisy communication channel
Invoked to justify the use of communication-theoretic error correction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1129 out tokens · 45731 ms · 2026-05-14T23:47:42.025071+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We identify two types of channel interference, namely local bit flips and global stochastic distortions, and design a cascaded defense combining error-correcting codes and majority voting.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean absolute_floor_iff_bare_distinguishability unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the diffusion generation, channel attacks, and reverse diffusion processes together form a binary input additive white gaussian noise channel (BIAWGN)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Waves: Bench- marking the robustness of image watermarks

Bang An, Mucong Ding, Tahseen Rabbani, Aakriti Agrawal, Yuancheng Xu, Chenghao Deng, Sicheng Zhu, Abdirisak Mohamed, Yuxin Wen, Tom Goldstein, et al. Waves: Bench- marking the robustness of image watermarks. InInterna- tional Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1456–1492. PMLR, 2024. 8

work page 2024
[2]

Compressai: a pytorch library and evalua- tion platform for end-to-end compression research.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03029, 2020

Jean B ´egaint, Fabien Racap ´e, Simon Feltman, and Akshay Pushparaja. Compressai: a pytorch library and evalua- tion platform for end-to-end compression research.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03029, 2020. 8

work page arXiv 2011
[3]

arXiv:1802.07228, 2018

Miles Brundage, Shahar Avin, Jack Clark, Helen Toner, Pe- ter Eckersley, Ben Garfinkel, Allan Dafoe, Paul Scharre, Thomas Zeitzoff, Bobby Filar, et al. The malicious use of ar- tificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07228, 2018. 1

work page arXiv 2018
[4]

Learned image compression with discretized gaussian mixture likelihoods and attention modules

Zhengxue Cheng, Heming Sun, Masaru Takeuchi, and Jiro Katto. Learned image compression with discretized gaussian mixture likelihoods and attention modules. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7939–7948, 2020. 8

work page 2020
[5]

Morgan kaufmann, 2007

Ingemar Cox, Matthew Miller, Jeffrey Bloom, Jessica Fridrich, and Ton Kalker.Digital watermarking and steganography. Morgan kaufmann, 2007. 5, 6, 7

work page 2007
[6]

The stable signature: Rooting watermarks in latent diffusion models

Pierre Fernandez, Guillaume Couairon, Herv ´e J ´egou, Matthijs Douze, and Teddy Furon. The stable signature: Rooting watermarks in latent diffusion models. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 22466–22477, 2023. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7

work page 2023
[7]

Generative adversarial nets.Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014

Ian J Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets.Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014. 2

work page 2014
[8]

An unde- tectable watermark for generative image models

Sam Gunn, Xuandong Zhao, and Dawn Song. An unde- tectable watermark for generative image models. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Represen- tations, 2024. 1, 5, 6, 7

work page 2024
[9]

Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 1, 2

work page 2020
[10]

Ai hype as a cyber security risk: The moral re- sponsibility of implementing generative ai in business.AI and Ethics, 4(3):791–804, 2024

Declan Humphreys, Abigail Koay, Dennis Desmond, and Er- ica Mealy. Ai hype as a cyber security risk: The moral re- sponsibility of implementing generative ai in business.AI and Ethics, 4(3):791–804, 2024. 1

work page 2024
[11]

Latent diffusion models for image watermarking: A review of recent trends and future directions.Electronics, 14 (1):25, 2024

Hongjun Hur, Minjae Kang, Sanghyeok Seo, and Jong-Uk Hou. Latent diffusion models for image watermarking: A review of recent trends and future directions.Electronics, 14 (1):25, 2024. 3

work page 2024
[12]

Wouaf: Weight modulation for user attri- bution and fingerprinting in text-to-image diffusion models

Changhoon Kim, Kyle Min, Maitreya Patel, Sheng Cheng, and Yezhou Yang. Wouaf: Weight modulation for user attri- bution and fingerprinting in text-to-image diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8974–8983, 2024. 1

work page 2024
[13]

Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes

Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding varia- tional bayes.arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013. 2

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[14]

GaussMarker: Robust dual-domain watermark for diffusion models

Kecen Li, Zhicong Huang, Xinwen Hou, and Cheng Hong. GaussMarker: Robust dual-domain watermark for diffusion models. InProceedings of the 42nd International Confer- ence on Machine Learning, pages 34688–34701, 2025. 3

work page 2025
[15]

Mirror diffusion models for constrained and wa- termarked generation.Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 36:42898–42917, 2023

Guan-Horng Liu, Tianrong Chen, Evangelos Theodorou, and Molei Tao. Mirror diffusion models for constrained and wa- termarked generation.Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 36:42898–42917, 2023. 3

work page 2023
[16]

Pseudo numerical methods for diffusion models on manifolds

Luping Liu, Yi Ren, Zhijie Lin, and Zhou Zhao. Pseudo numerical methods for diffusion models on manifolds. InIn- ternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. 6

work page 2022
[17]

Harnessing frequency spectrum insights for image copyright protection against dif- fusion models

Zhenguang Liu, Chao Shuai, Shaojing Fan, Ziping Dong, Jinwu Hu, Zhongjie Ba, and Kui Ren. Harnessing frequency spectrum insights for image copyright protection against dif- fusion models. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 18653–18662, 2025. 1, 3

work page 2025
[18]

Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffu- sion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps.Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, 35:5775– 5787, 2022

Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Fan Bao, Jianfei Chen, Chongxuan Li, and Jun Zhu. Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffu- sion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps.Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, 35:5775– 5787, 2022. 6

work page 2022
[19]

Towards deep learn- ing models resistant to adversarial attacks

Aleksander Madry, Aleksandar Makelov, Ludwig Schmidt, Dimitris Tsipras, and Adrian Vladu. Towards deep learn- ing models resistant to adversarial attacks. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2018. 8

work page 2018
[20]

Latent watermark: Inject and detect watermarks in latent diffusion space.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2025

Zheling Meng, Bo Peng, and Jing Dong. Latent watermark: Inject and detect watermarks in latent diffusion space.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2025. 3

work page 2025
[21]

High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 1, 2, 3

work page 2022
[22]

Denois- ing diffusion implicit models

Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denois- ing diffusion implicit models. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2020. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6

work page 2020
[23]

Tree-rings watermarks: Invisible fingerprints for diffusion images

Yuxin Wen, John Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, and Tom Goldstein. Tree-rings watermarks: Invisible fingerprints for diffusion images. InAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, pages 58047–58063. Curran Associates, Inc., 2023. 1, 5, 6, 7

work page 2023
[24]

Gaussian shading: Prov- able performance-lossless image watermarking for diffusion models

Zijin Yang, Kai Zeng, Kejiang Chen, Han Fang, Weim- ing Zhang, and Nenghai Yu. Gaussian shading: Prov- able performance-lossless image watermarking for diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12162– 12171, 2024. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7

work page 2024
[25]

Fast sampling of diffu- sion models with exponential integrator

Qinsheng Zhang and Yongxin Chen. Fast sampling of diffu- sion models with exponential integrator. InThe Eleventh In- ternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. 6

work page 2022
[26]

Unipc: A unified predictor-corrector framework for fast sampling of diffusion models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:49842–49869, 2023

Wenliang Zhao, Lujia Bai, Yongming Rao, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Unipc: A unified predictor-corrector framework for fast sampling of diffusion models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:49842–49869, 2023. 6

work page 2023