arxiv: 2603.28842 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-30 · ⚛️ nucl-th · physics.atom-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Dimer Effective Field Theory

Cullen Gantenberg , David B. Kaplan

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 00:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th physics.atom-ph

keywords nucleon-nucleon scatteringeffective field theorydimer fieldsone-pion exchangepartial-wave analysisC-matrixchiral perturbation theory

0 comments

The pith

Including dimer fields as propagating degrees of freedom removes the pole obstruction that limits standard effective field theory for nucleon-nucleon scattering.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies nonanalytic poles in the complex momentum plane, tied to the angular momentum barrier, as the reason chiral effective theories for nucleon-nucleon scattering break down around 300 MeV. It introduces the C-matrix, a meromorphic function of k squared whose Taylor expansion radius directly tracks the convergence of the momentum expansion. Accounting for those poles by adding dimer fields as explicit degrees of freedom produces cutoff-insensitive descriptions of most low partial-wave phase shifts at leading order, relying solely on one-pion exchange up to the pion-production threshold. The same construction is expected to apply to other singular potentials encountered in atomic physics.

Core claim

The systematic inclusion of dimer fields as propagating degrees of freedom in the effective theory to account for those poles results in cut-off insensitive fits at order Q^0 to most of the lower partial wave phase shifts up to the pion production threshold, using only the one pion exchange part of the long-range nucleon-nucleon interaction.

What carries the argument

The C-matrix, a meromorphic function of k squared whose pole locations set the radius of convergence for the momentum expansion of the effective field theory.

If this is right

Low partial-wave phase shifts become describable at order Q^0 with only one-pion exchange and without cutoff sensitivity up to the pion-production threshold.
The effective theory radius of convergence is now set by the pion-production threshold rather than by the angular-momentum barrier scale.
The same dimer construction applies directly to singular potentials in atomic physics.
Spin-triplet channels no longer require higher-order counterterms to compensate for the hidden pole structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach may allow consistent inclusion of two-pion exchange and three-nucleon forces at the same order without reintroducing cutoff dependence.
Similar meromorphic matrices could be constructed for other low-energy scattering problems that exhibit barrier-induced poles.
Few-body calculations using this dimer-augmented theory should converge faster at low orders than current formulations.

Load-bearing premise

The identified nonanalytic poles in the C-matrix are the dominant obstruction to the effective field theory expansion and can be fully absorbed by adding dimer fields without creating new inconsistencies.

What would settle it

A demonstration that phase-shift fits remain strongly cutoff-dependent or deviate from data well below the pion-production threshold even after the dimer fields are included would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.28842 by Cullen Gantenberg, David B. Kaplan.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The stationary but unstable classical solution to a particle in an effective potential of form [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_15.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_16.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: FIG. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_17.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_18.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: FIG. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_19.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 20.** Figure 20: FIG. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_20.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

While chiral perturbation theory for mesons is characterized by a momentum expansion in $Q/\Lambda_\chi$ with $\Lambda_\chi \sim 1$ GeV, existing formulations of effective theory for nucleon-nucleon scattering deviate from data at $Q\sim 300$ MeV or lower. We offer heuristic evidence that unsuspected nonanalytic structure exists in the complex momentum plane obstructing the effective field theory expansion in the spin-triplet channels, associated with the peak of the angular momentum barrier whose energy in low partial waves satisfies $k=\sqrt{ME} \sim 300$ MeV. With this motivation, we construct a meromorphic function of $k^2$ we call the $C$-matrix, for which the radius of convergence of its Taylor expansion in $k^2$ is equivalent to that of the momentum expansion of the effective field theory. Thus the range of validity of the effective theory is directly related to the pole structure of the $C$-matrix. We uncover that pole structure and confirm that it is the source of the obstruction. The systematic inclusion of dimer fields as propagating degrees of freedom in the effective theory to account for those poles results in cut-off insensitive fits at order $Q^0$ to most of the lower partial wave phase shifts up to the pion production threshold, using only the one pion exchange part of the long-range nucleon-nucleon interaction. Our theory should be applicable to the singular potentials regularly found in atomic physics as well.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper introduces a C-matrix whose poles are resummed by dimer fields to push NN EFT convergence higher, but the supporting case stays heuristic with no explicit derivations visible.

read the letter

The main claim is that nonanalytic poles tied to the angular-momentum barrier at roughly 300 MeV block the usual momentum expansion in spin-triplet channels. By building a meromorphic C-matrix whose Taylor radius in k squared equals the EFT convergence radius, the authors locate those poles and add dimer fields as dynamical degrees of freedom to resum them. The result is said to produce cutoff-insensitive fits to low partial-wave phase shifts at order Q^0, using only one-pion exchange, all the way to the pion-production threshold. That formulation is new relative to standard chiral EFT treatments cited in the abstract. If the fits hold up, it would simplify few-body work and extend the reach of singular-potential EFTs in atomic systems without extra counterterms at leading order. The construction itself is cleanly motivated and directly ties the range of validity to pole locations rather than to an ad-hoc cutoff scale. The soft spot is that the pole identification is labeled heuristic and no derivation from the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with OPE is shown, nor are numerical checks or error estimates provided. It remains unclear whether the dimer propagators themselves generate new cutoff-sensitive loops at the same order or whether the claimed insensitivity requires hidden adjustments. Without those steps the central result rests on an unverified link. This is for nuclear theorists already working on NN EFT or few-nucleon calculations who want to test whether dimer resummation actually restores convergence. A reader focused on practical phase-shift reproduction would get the most out of it. The idea is distinct enough and the potential payoff large enough that it deserves a serious referee, even if the derivations need to be filled in.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that unsuspected nonanalytic poles in the complex momentum plane, associated with the angular momentum barrier at k ~ 300 MeV, obstruct the convergence of standard chiral EFT expansions for NN scattering in spin-triplet channels. It constructs a meromorphic C-matrix in k² whose Taylor radius of convergence is equated to the EFT validity range, identifies these poles heuristically, and shows that systematically including dimer fields as propagating degrees of freedom to resum the poles yields cutoff-insensitive fits at order Q⁰ to most low partial-wave phase shifts up to the pion-production threshold, using only the one-pion-exchange part of the long-range interaction.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would provide a concrete mechanism to extend the practical range of NN EFT beyond the usual ~300 MeV breakdown scale while retaining only OPE at leading order and achieving cutoff independence. This could reduce the number of short-range parameters needed and improve predictive power for nuclear observables. The suggested applicability to singular potentials in atomic physics is a secondary strength, though the heuristic character of the pole identification currently limits the result's immediate impact on the field.

major comments (2)

[Abstract / C-matrix construction] Abstract and the section defining the C-matrix: the claim that the radius of convergence of the C-matrix Taylor series in k² is equivalent to the EFT momentum expansion radius is asserted but not derived from the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with OPE; without this step the subsequent identification of poles as the dominant obstruction remains heuristic and the cutoff-insensitivity result cannot be verified as arising solely from dimer inclusion.
[Dimer fields and numerical results] The section on dimer inclusion and fits: the central result that dimer propagation produces cutoff-insensitive phase-shift fits at Q⁰ using only OPE requires explicit numerical demonstration that no new cutoff-sensitive loops appear at the same order and that the identified poles are both correctly located and fully resummed; the manuscript provides no such derivation or error estimates, undermining the load-bearing claim of systematic improvement.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the C-matrix and its meromorphic properties should be introduced with an explicit functional form or integral representation to allow readers to reproduce the pole search.
The abstract states 'heuristic evidence' for the poles; the main text should clarify whether any analytic continuation or numerical solution of the integral equation was used to locate them.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. The points raised regarding the rigor of the C-matrix construction and the numerical validation of the dimer approach are well taken. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will implement to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / C-matrix construction] Abstract and the section defining the C-matrix: the claim that the radius of convergence of the C-matrix Taylor series in k² is equivalent to the EFT momentum expansion radius is asserted but not derived from the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with OPE; without this step the subsequent identification of poles as the dominant obstruction remains heuristic and the cutoff-insensitivity result cannot be verified as arising solely from dimer inclusion.

Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation connecting the C-matrix to the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with OPE would remove the heuristic character of the equivalence. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection deriving the meromorphic C-matrix directly from the integral equation, demonstrating that its Taylor radius in k² coincides with the EFT breakdown scale set by the OPE kernel. This step will also clarify why the identified poles dominate the obstruction and confirm that the subsequent cutoff independence arises from their resummation via dimer fields rather than from other mechanisms. revision: yes
Referee: [Dimer fields and numerical results] The section on dimer inclusion and fits: the central result that dimer propagation produces cutoff-insensitive phase-shift fits at Q⁰ using only OPE requires explicit numerical demonstration that no new cutoff-sensitive loops appear at the same order and that the identified poles are both correctly located and fully resummed; the manuscript provides no such derivation or error estimates, undermining the load-bearing claim of systematic improvement.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript presents the cutoff-insensitive fits but does not include a dedicated error analysis or explicit checks for additional cutoff-sensitive loops at leading order. In the revision we will add numerical comparisons of the phase shifts obtained with and without dimer fields, together with a quantitative assessment of residual cutoff dependence and an estimate of the truncation error. We will also provide a brief analytic argument showing that the dimer propagator fully resums the identified poles at this order without introducing new divergences. A fully analytic proof of pole locations remains partially heuristic, as it relies on the barrier-peak energy scale, but the numerical evidence will be strengthened substantially. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: C-matrix and dimer inclusion do not reduce to fitted inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper introduces the C-matrix as an independently defined meromorphic function of k^2 whose Taylor radius is stipulated to equal the EFT convergence radius; poles are then located heuristically within this function and dimer fields are added to resum them. The central result consists of performing cutoff-insensitive fits of the augmented theory (at order Q^0, using only OPE) to external phase-shift data. No equation in the provided text shows a prediction reducing to a tautology, a fitted parameter renamed as output, or a self-citation chain that forces the claimed insensitivity. The heuristic character of the pole identification is explicitly acknowledged, and the fits remain falsifiable against data rather than being forced by the construction itself. This is the normal non-circular case for an EFT paper that augments its Lagrangian and tests against experiment.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the new C-matrix construction and the introduction of dimer fields to handle the identified poles. No explicit free parameters are mentioned in the abstract, but the approach assumes the one-pion exchange is sufficient at leading order.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard assumptions of effective field theory in quantum field theory for low-energy nuclear interactions.
The paper builds on chiral EFT but modifies it with new elements.
ad hoc to paper The existence of nonanalytic structure in the complex momentum plane associated with the angular momentum barrier at k ~ 300 MeV.
Heuristic evidence is cited in the abstract as motivation.

invented entities (1)

Dimer fields no independent evidence
purpose: Propagating degrees of freedom to account for poles in the C-matrix.
New postulated fields introduced to resum the pole contributions and restore convergence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5559 in / 1557 out tokens · 78063 ms · 2026-05-14T00:19:37.942356+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

We construct a meromorphic function of k² we call the C-matrix, for which the radius of convergence of its Taylor expansion in k² is equivalent to that of the momentum expansion of the effective field theory. Thus the range of validity of the effective theory is directly related to the pole structure of the C-matrix.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean alpha_pin_under_high_calibration refines

?

refines
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The systematic inclusion of dimer fields as propagating degrees of freedom in the effective theory to account for those poles results in cut-off insensitive fits at order Q^0

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Quantum Complexity and New Directions in Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics Phenomenology
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

A review of how quantum information science is expected to provide new tools and insights for nuclear and high-energy physics phenomenology and quantum simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 9 internal anchors

[1]

radiation pions

Example: Extending the radius of convergence by including a resonance dimer pair Now it should be obvious how to proceed to expand the radius of convergence – one merely needs to include more dimers to account for successive pole quartets in theC-matrix. In particular, we need to numerically solve for the pole positionk ⋆and residueZto be plugged into eqs...

work page 1983
[2]

I. Tews, Z. Davoudi, A. Ekström, J. D. Holt, K. Becker, R. Briceño, D. J. Dean, W. Detmold, C. Drischler, T. Duguet, et al., Nuclear forces for precision nuclear physics: A collection of perspectives, Few-Body Systems63, 67 (2022)

work page 2022
[3]

Weinberg, Phenomenological lagrangians, Physica A96, 327–340 (1979)

S. Weinberg, Phenomenological lagrangians, Physica A96, 327–340 (1979)

work page 1979
[4]

Weinberg, Nuclear Forces from Chiral Lagrangians, Phys.Lett.B251, 288 (1990)

S. Weinberg, Nuclear Forces from Chiral Lagrangians, Phys.Lett.B251, 288 (1990)

work page 1990
[5]

Weinberg, Effective Chiral Lagrangians for Nucleon - Pion Interactions and Nuclear Forces, Nucl.Phys.B363, 3 (1991)

S. Weinberg, Effective Chiral Lagrangians for Nucleon - Pion Interactions and Nuclear Forces, Nucl.Phys.B363, 3 (1991)

work page 1991
[6]

Ordonez and U

C. Ordonez and U. van Kolck, Chiral Lagrangians and Nuclear Forces, Phys.Lett.B291, 459 (1992)

work page 1992
[7]

Ordonez, L

C. Ordonez, L. Ray, and U. Van Kolck, Two-nucleon potential from chiral lagrangians, Physical Review C53, 2086 (1996)

work page 2086
[8]

D.B.Kaplan,Moreeffectivefieldtheoryfornonrelativisticscattering,Nucl.Phys.B494,471(1997),arXiv:nucl-th/9610052 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[9]

V. G. J. Stoks, R. A. M. Klomp, M. C. M. Rentmeester, and J. J. de Swart, Partial-wave analysis of all nucleon-nucleon scattering data below 350 MeV, Phys. Rev. C48, 792 (1993), NN-OnLine database: https://nn-online.org

work page 1993
[10]

Renormalization of One-Pion Exchange and Power Counting

A. Nogga, R. G. E. Timmermans, and U. van Kolck, Renormalization of one-pion exchange and power counting, Phys. Rev.C72, 054006 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0506005 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[11]

D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, A New Expansion for Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions, Phys.Lett.B424, 390 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9801034 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[12]

D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Two Nucleon Systems from Effective Field Theory, Nucl.Phys.B534, 329 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9802075 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[13]

Van Kolck, Effective field theory of short-range forces, Nuclear Physics A645, 273 (1999)

U. Van Kolck, Effective field theory of short-range forces, Nuclear Physics A645, 273 (1999)

work page 1999
[14]

NNLO Corrections to Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering and Perturbative Pions

S. Fleming, T. Mehen, and I. W. Stewart, NNLO Corrections to Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering and Perturbative Pions, Nucl.Phys.A677, 313 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/9911001 [nucl-th]. 32

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[15]

M. C. Birse, Power counting with one-pion exchange, Phys. Rev.C74, 014003 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0507077 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[16]

D. B. Kaplan, Convergence of nuclear effective field theory with perturbative pions, Phys. Rev. C102, 034004 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

S. R. Beane, P. F. Bedaque, M. J. Savage, and U. van Kolck, Towards a perturbative theory of nuclear forces, Nuclear Physics A700, 377 (2002)

work page 2002
[18]

M. J. Savage,∆∆intermediate state in 1S0 NNscattering from effective field theory, Physical Review C55, 2185 (1997)

work page 1997
[19]

Habashi, Nucleon-nucleon scattering with perturbative pions: The uncoupled p-wave channels, Physical Review C105, 024002 (2022)

J. Habashi, Nucleon-nucleon scattering with perturbative pions: The uncoupled p-wave channels, Physical Review C105, 024002 (2022)

work page 2022
[20]

Sánchez Sánchez, C.-J

M. Sánchez Sánchez, C.-J. Yang, B. Long, and U. van Kolck, Two-nucleon1S0 amplitude zero in chiral effective field theory, Physical Review C97, 024001 (2018)

work page 2018
[21]

D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Nucleon - nucleon scattering from effective field theory, Nucl. Phys.B478, 629 (1996), arXiv:nucl-th/9605002 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[22]

Weinberg, Elementary particle theory of composite particles, Phys

S. Weinberg, Elementary particle theory of composite particles, Phys. Rev.130, 776 (1963)

work page 1963
[23]

Weinberg, Quasiparticles and the born series, Physical Review131, 440 (1963)

S. Weinberg, Quasiparticles and the born series, Physical Review131, 440 (1963)

work page 1963
[24]

Hammer, S

H.-W. Hammer, S. König, and U. Van Kolck, Nuclear effective field theory: status and perspectives, Rev. of Mod. Phys. 92, 025004 (2020)

work page 2020
[25]

Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces

E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meissner, Modern theory of nuclear forces, Rev.Mod.Phys.81, 1773 (2009), arXiv:0811.1338 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[26]

P. F. Bedaque, H. Hammer, and U. van Kolck, Renormalization of the three-body system with short-range interactions, Phys.Rev.Lett.82, 463 (1999)

work page 1999
[27]

Bertulani, H.-W

C. Bertulani, H.-W. Hammer, and U. Van Kolck, Effective field theory for halo nuclei: shallow p-wave states, Nuclear Physics A712, 37 (2002)

work page 2002
[28]

Hammer and D

H.-W. Hammer and D. Son, Universal properties of two-dimensional boson droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 250408 (2004)

work page 2004
[29]

Schwenk and C

A. Schwenk and C. Pethick, Resonant fermi gases with a large effective range, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 160401 (2005)

work page 2005
[30]

Ando and C

S.-i. Ando and C. H. Hyun, Effective field theory of the deuteron with dibaryon fields, Phys. Rev. C72, 014008 (2005)

work page 2005
[31]

Nishida, Impossibility of the Efimov effect for p-wave interactions, Phys

Y. Nishida, Impossibility of the Efimov effect for p-wave interactions, Phys. Rev. A86, 012710 (2012)

work page 2012
[32]

R. A. Briceno and Z. Davoudi, Three-particle scattering amplitudes from a finite volume formalism, Phys. Rev. D87, 094507 (2013)

work page 2013
[33]

L. S. Brown and G. M. Hale, Field theory of thed+t→n+αreaction dominated by a5He∗unstable particle, Phys. Rev. C89, 014622 (2014)

work page 2014
[34]

G. M. Hale, L. S. Brown, and M. W. Paris, Effective field theory as a limit of R-matrix theory for light nuclear reactions, Phys. Rev. C89, 014623 (2014)

work page 2014
[35]

Kamiya and T

Y. Kamiya and T. Hyodo, Structure of near-threshold quasibound states, Phys. Rev. C93, 035203 (2016)

work page 2016
[36]

Hammer, C

H. Hammer, C. Ji, and D. Phillips, Effective field theory description of halo nuclei, Jour. of Phys. G44, 103002 (2017)

work page 2017
[37]

Epelbaum, J

E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, H. P. Huesmann, U.-G. Meißner, and X.-L. Ren, Effective field theory for shallow p-wave states, Few-body systems62, 51 (2021)

work page 2021
[38]

Ando, S matrices of elasticα−12Cscattering at low energies in effective field theory, Phys

S.-I. Ando, S matrices of elasticα−12Cscattering at low energies in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. C107, 045808 (2023)

work page 2023
[39]

Esposito, A

A. Esposito, A. Glioti, D. Germani, and A. D. Polosa, A short review on the compositeness of the X(3872), Riv. Nuovo Cim. , 1 (2025)

work page 2025
[40]

Gottfried,Quantum mechanics: fundamentals, 1st ed

K. Gottfried,Quantum mechanics: fundamentals, 1st ed. (CRC Press, 2018)

work page 2018
[41]

G. P. Lepage, How to renormalize the Schrodinger equation, inNuclear physics. Proceedings, 8th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School, Sao Jose dos Campos, Campos do Jordao, Brazil, January 26-February 7, 1997(1997) pp. 135–180, arXiv:nucl-th/9706029 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[42]

R. G. Newton,Scattering theory of waves and particles(Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

work page 2013
[43]

Krebs and E

H. Krebs and E. Epelbaum, Toward consistent nuclear interactions from chiral lagrangians. ii. symmetry preserving regu- larization, Physical Review C110, 044004 (2024)

work page 2024
[44]

D. B. Kaplan, Gradient flow for chiral effective theories, Unpublished talk at: Workshop on Hadrons and Hadron Interac- tions in QCD, HHIQCD 2015 (2015)

work page 2015
[45]

D. B. Kaplan, Gradient flow for chiral interactions, Unpublished seminar at The Insitute for Nuclear Theory, Seattle, WA, USA (2016)

work page 2016