Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 46 references

In flat homogeneous collapse, quantum corrections that only act as extra matter cannot stop singularities in any analytic gravity theory.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

In homogeneous spatially flat collapse, non-vanishing effective-matter quantum corrections cannot resolve singularities in vacuum-normalized analytic gravity theories; resolution needs non-analytic response at Q=0 or vanishing high-density energy density.

T0 review reviewed 2026-07-13 challenge →

load-bearing objection The supplied full text is the wrong paper (DreamControl-v2 robotics), so the claimed no-go for singularity resolution cannot be checked at all. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2604.00204 v2 pith:HBXHJ44Q submitted 2026-03-31 gr-qc hep-th

No-Go Theorem for Singularity Resolution

Zhen-Xiao Zhang , Chen Lan , Yan-Gang Miao This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords singularity resolutiongravitational collapseno-go theoremeffective energy densityf(Q) gravitygeometrical trinityanalytic gravitational theoriesquantum gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a no-go result for a large class of quantum-gravity attempts to remove singularities. Inside homogeneous, spatially flat gravitational collapse, any quantum correction that appears only as a non-vanishing effective energy density is still powerless to halt the singularity, provided the underlying gravitational theory is analytic and vacuum-normalized. That covers ordinary general relativity and other theories whose gravitational actions are analytic. The result therefore rules out singularity resolution by effective density alone in approaches such as asymptotic safety and noncommutative geometry. True resolution, the authors argue, requires either a non-analytic change in the gravitational response at vanishing non-metricity or an effective density that itself vanishes at high density, as in certain loop-quantum-gravity models.

Core claim

Within the sector of homogeneous, spatially flat collapse, quantum corrections introduced solely as non-vanishing effective matter sources cannot prevent singularities in any vacuum-normalized analytic gravitational theory. Singularity resolution therefore demands either non-analytic modifications of the gravitational response at zero non-metricity or an effective energy density that vanishes at high densities.

What carries the argument

An intrinsic f(Q) gravity description of the homogeneous collapse response, extended by the geometrical trinity to general relativity, f(R) and f(T), together with non-metricity-based regularity and junction conditions that replace ordinary general-relativity tools.

Load-bearing premise

The argument applies only to homogeneous, spatially flat collapse and only to theories that stay analytic and vacuum-normalized when quantum effects are written purely as extra matter sources.

What would settle it

Exhibit a vacuum-normalized analytic theory in which a non-vanishing effective density alone produces a complete, singularity-free homogeneous flat collapse, or show that the geometrical-trinity map introduces extra degrees of freedom that resolve the singularity outside the pure response structure.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Asymptotic-safety and noncommutative-geometry models that keep a finite effective density will still produce finite-time singularities or geodesic incompleteness in this sector.
  • Any successful singularity-resolving theory must either break analyticity of the gravitational response at Q = 0 or drive the effective density to zero at high density.
  • Loop-quantum-gravity Planck-star scenarios remain viable precisely because they realize the second of those two routes.
  • Regularity criteria and junction conditions can be formulated entirely in non-metricity language without relying on standard general-relativity tools.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the no-go survives more general (inhomogeneous or anisotropic) collapse, many effective-field-theory approaches to quantum gravity would need non-analytic or non-matter ingredients from the outset.
  • The result suggests a sharp diagnostic: any proposed quantum correction can be checked first for whether it remains a non-vanishing effective source inside an analytic vacuum-normalized theory.
  • Future work could test whether relaxing vacuum-normalization alone is enough to evade the theorem or whether non-analyticity is indispensable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The abstract claims a No-Go theorem: in homogeneous, spatially flat gravitational collapse, quantum corrections modeled solely as non-vanishing effective matter sources cannot halt singularities in any vacuum-normalized analytic gravitational theory (including GR, f(R), f(T)), with the proof said to be given in an intrinsic f(Q) framework and extended via the geometrical trinity, using non-metricity regularity and junction conditions. The supplied full manuscript, however, is an unrelated robotics paper (DreamControl-v2) on trainable guided diffusion priors for autonomous humanoid loco-manipulation on the Unitree-G1. It contains no gravitational field equations, no f(Q)/non-metricity analysis, no analyticity or vacuum-normalization hypotheses, no regularity or junction conditions, and no singularity or geodesic-incompleteness argument. The central claim is therefore unsupported by any inspectable derivation in the manuscript body.

Significance. A correctly proved result of the kind advertised would be significant: it would constrain a broad class of quantum-gravity effective descriptions (asymptotic safety, noncommutative geometry, and related approaches) that try to resolve collapse singularities by effective energy density alone, and would isolate non-analytic vacuum response at Q=0 or vanishing high-density effective density (as in LQG Planck stars) as necessary ingredients. That significance cannot be assessed here, because the manuscript does not contain the theorem, its hypotheses, or its proof. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code for the no-go, or falsifiable gravitational predictions are present in the provided text.

major comments (3)
  1. Title/abstract vs. full text: the manuscript body is DreamControl-v2 (humanoid diffusion priors, RL tracking, Unitree-G1 experiments; arXiv-style content matching 2604.00202), not a gr-qc paper on singularity resolution. No section, equation, or appendix states or proves a No-Go for singularity resolution. The load-bearing claim is therefore not present in the submission as provided and cannot be verified.
  2. Abstract claim of an intrinsic f(Q) proof with non-metricity regularity/junction conditions and a geometrical-trinity extension to GR, f(R), and f(T): none of these objects appear in the full text. There are no collapse metrics, no effective stress-energy, no analyticity/vacuum-normalization definitions, and no reduction of homogeneous flat collapse response structures. Without that derivation, the theorem’s scope restrictions (homogeneous flat sector; matter-only quantum corrections; trinity map without extra DOF) cannot be checked.
  3. Abstract assertion that effective energy densities in asymptotic safety and noncommutative geometry yield finite-time singularities or geodesic incompleteness, and that resolution requires non-analytic response at Q=0 or vanishing high-density effective density: these comparative claims are not supported by any calculation, citation analysis, or theorem statement in the body. They remain unsubstantiated advertising relative to the submitted text.
minor comments (2)
  1. The provided body is a coherent robotics manuscript (DreamControl-v2) with its own figures, related work, and experiments; presentation issues internal to that robotics text are irrelevant to the gr-qc abstract and are not reviewed here.
  2. Paper identifiers in the cache (2604.00204 vs. content matching 2604.00202) suggest a source mix-up; the authors should resubmit the correct gr-qc manuscript if that was intended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation can be exhibited: full text is the wrong paper (DreamControl-v2 robotics), so the claimed No-Go proof chain is absent.

full rationale

The abstract asserts a No-Go theorem for singularity resolution under vacuum-normalized analytic gravitational response with non-vanishing effective matter sources, proved in f(Q) and extended via the geometrical trinity. The supplied FULL MANUSCRIPT TEXT is instead DreamControl-v2 (humanoid diffusion/RL robotics; arXiv 2604.00202), containing no f(Q) collapse equations, analyticity or vacuum-normalization hypotheses, regularity/junction conditions, or trinity reduction. Per hard rules, circularity may be claimed only when a specific reduction is quotable from the paper (definitional identity, fitted input renamed as prediction, load-bearing self-citation chain, etc.). No such reduction is present: the abstract statement alone is not equivalent to its premises by construction, and the robotics manuscript has no first-principles derivation of the claimed theorem. Therefore no circular steps are identified; score 0 is the honest non-finding. Scope caveats and uncheckable definitions are correctness/scope issues, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review: free parameters are not visible. Load-bearing background includes restriction to homogeneous flat collapse, analytic vacuum-normalized gravitational actions, modeling of quantum corrections solely as non-vanishing effective matter, and the claim that geometrical-trinity response structures transfer the no-go from f(Q) to GR/f(R)/f(T). No new particles are introduced; the main invented conceptual package is the intrinsic f(Q) collapse-response formulation used as the proof vehicle.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The physical sector under consideration is homogeneous, spatially flat gravitational collapse.
    Abstract states the no-go only within this sector; outside it the claim is not asserted.
  • domain assumption Gravitational theories considered are vacuum-normalized and analytic in the gravitational action/response.
    Central exclusion of singularity resolution is limited to this class, including GR and other analytic actions.
  • domain assumption Quantum corrections enter solely as non-vanishing effective matter sources (effective energy density), not as non-analytic changes of the gravitational response.
    This is the mechanism the theorem says is insufficient; alternatives (non-analytic Q=0 response or vanishing high-density density) are the stated escape routes.
  • ad hoc to paper The geometrical trinity identifies homogeneous collapse response structures so that an f(Q)-based no-go extends to GR, f(R), and f(T).
    Abstract claims universal extension at the level of response structure with non-metricity-based regularity/junction conditions; this mapping is load-bearing and not checkable from the abstract alone.
  • standard math Standard mathematical notions of finite-time singularity and geodesic incompleteness are the failure criteria.
    Used as the definition of unresolved singularity in the abstract’s conclusion.
invented entities (1)
  • Intrinsic f(Q) homogeneous-collapse response framework with non-metricity regularity and junction conditions no independent evidence
    purpose: Serve as the proof vehicle and as the structure that is said to transfer the no-go across the geometrical trinity without standard GR tools.
    Presented as the paper’s technical setting; independent evidence outside this work is not provided in the abstract.

reviewed 2026-07-13 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of No-Go Theorem for Singularity Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HBXHJ44Q

@misc{pith2026260400204,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: No-Go Theorem for Singularity Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HBXHJ44Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.00204}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We prove a No-Go theorem for singularity resolution in homogeneous, spatially flat gravitational collapse: within this sector, quantum corrections introduced solely as non-vanishing effective matter sources are insufficient to halt singularities in any vacuum-normalized analytic gravitational theory, including general relativity and other theories with analytic gravitational actions. This theorem rules out singularity resolution via effective energy density in a broad class of quantum gravity approaches, including asymptotic safety and noncommutative geometry theories, where the effective energy densities yield finite-time singularities or geodesic incompleteness. The singularity resolution strictly requires non-analytic modifications of the gravitational response at $\mathbb{Q}=0$, or a vanishing effective energy density at high densities (as realized in loop quantum gravity's Planck stars). The theorem is proved via an intrinsic $f(\mathbb{Q})$ gravity framework, extended universally to general relativity, $f(\mathbb{R})$, and $f(\mathbb{T})$ theories through the geometrical trinity at the level of the corresponding homogeneous collapse response structure--with regularity criteria and junction conditions grounded in non-metricity, free of standard GR tools.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Closd: Closing the loop between simulation and diffusion for multi-task character control,

    G. Tevet, S. Raab, S. Cohan, D. Reda, Z. Luo, X. B. Peng, A. H. Bermano, and M. van de Panne, “Closd: Closing the loop between simulation and diffusion for multi-task character control,”����� �������� ����������������, 2024

    2024

  2. [2]

    Dreamcontrol: Human-inspired whole-body humanoid control for scene interaction via guided diffusion,

    D. Kalaria, S. S. Harithas, P. Katara, S. Kwak, S. Bhagat, S. Sastry, S. Sridhar, S. Vemprala, A. Kapoor, and J. C.-K. Huang, “Dreamcontrol: Human-inspired whole-body humanoid control for scene interaction via guided diffusion,”����� �������� ����������������, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Omnigrasp: Grasping diverse objects with simulated humanoids,

    Z. Luo, J. Cao, S. Christen, A. Winkler, K. Kitani, and W. Xu, “Omnigrasp: Grasping diverse objects with simulated humanoids,” �������� �� ������ ����������� ���������� �������, vol. 37, pp. 2161– 2184, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Omnicontrol: Control any joint at any time for human motion generation,

    Y . Xie, V . Jampani, L. Zhong, D. Sun, and H. Jiang, “Omnicontrol: Control any joint at any time for human motion generation,” in��� ������� ������������� ���������� �� �������� ���������������, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=gd0lAEtWso

    2024

  5. [5]

    AMASS: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes,

    N. Mahmood, N. Ghorbani, N. F. Troje, G. Pons-Moll, and M. J. Black, “AMASS: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes,” in������������� ���������� �� �������� ������, Oct. 2019, pp. 5442–5451

    2019

  6. [6]

    Generating diverse and natural 3d human motions from text,

    C. Guo, S. Zou, X. Zuo, S. Wang, W. Ji, X. Li, and L. Cheng, “Generating diverse and natural 3d human motions from text,” in ����������� �� ��� �������� ���������� �� �������� ������ ��� ������� ����������� ������, June 2022, pp. 5152–5161

    2022

  7. [7]

    Gpt-4 technical report,

    J. Achiam, S. Adler, S. Agarwal, L. Ahmad, I. Akkaya, F. L. Aleman, D. Almeida, J. Altenschmidt, S. Altman, S. Anadkat�� ���, “Gpt-4 technical report,”����� �������� ����������������, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Language models are few-shot learners,

    T. B. Brown, “Language models are few-shot learners,”����� �������� ����������������, 2020

    2020

  9. [10]

    π0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control,

    K. Black, N. Brown, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, L. Groom, K. Hausman, B. Ichter�� ���, “π0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control,”����� �������� ����������������, 2024

    2024

  10. [11]

    π0.5: a vision-language-action model with open-world generalization,

    P. Intelligence, K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai�� ���, “ π0.5: a vision-language-action model with open-world generalization,”����� �������� ����������������, 2025

    2025

  11. [12]

    Openvla: An open- source vision-language-action model,

    M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. Foster, G. Lam, P. Sanketi�� ���, “Openvla: An open- source vision-language-action model,”����� �������� ����������������, 2024

    2024

  12. [13]

    Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion,

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song, “Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion,”��� ������������� ������� �� �������� ��������, vol. 44, no. 10-11, pp. 1684–1704, 2025

    2025

  13. [14]

    Human motion diffusion model,

    G. Tevet, S. Raab, B. Gordon, Y . Shafir, D. Cohen-Or, and A. H. Bermano, “Human motion diffusion model,”����� �������� ����������������, 2022

    2022

  14. [15]

    T2m-gpt: Generating human motion from textual descriptions with discrete representations,

    J. Zhang, Y . Zhang, X. Cun, S. Huang, Y . Zhang, H. Zhao, H. Lu, and X. Shen, “T2m-gpt: Generating human motion from textual descriptions with discrete representations,”����� �������� ����������������, 2023

    2023

  15. [16]

    Motiongpt: Human motion as a foreign language,

    B. Jiang, X. Chen, W. Liu, J. Yu, G. Yu, and T. Chen, “Motiongpt: Human motion as a foreign language,”�������� �� ������ ����������� ���������� �������, vol. 36, 2024

    2024

  16. [17]

    Motionglot: A multi-embodied motion generation model,

    S. Harithas and S. Sridhar, “Motionglot: A multi-embodied motion generation model,” in���� ���� ������������� ���������� �� �������� ��� ���������� ������. IEEE, 2025, pp. 16 109–16 116

    2025

  17. [18]

    Maskcontrol: Spatio-temporal control for masked motion synthesis,

    E. Pinyoanuntapong, M. Saleem, K. Karunratanakul, P. Wang, H. Xue, C. Chen, C. Guo, J. Cao, J. Ren, and S. Tulyakov, “Maskcontrol: Spatio-temporal control for masked motion synthesis,” in����������� �� ��� �������� ������������� ���������� �� �������� ������ ������, 2025, pp. 9955–9965

    2025

  18. [19]

    Learning from massive human videos for universal humanoid pose control,

    J. Mao, S. Zhao, S. Song, T. Shi, J. Ye, M. Zhang, H. Geng, J. Malik, V . Guizilini, and Y . Wang, “Learning from massive human videos for universal humanoid pose control,”����� �������� ����������������, 2024

    2024

  19. [20]

    Trajectory optimization for full-body movements with complex contacts,

    M. Al Borno, M. De Lasa, and A. Hertzmann, “Trajectory optimization for full-body movements with complex contacts,”���� ������������ �� ������������� ��� �������� ��������, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1405–1414, 2012

    2012

  20. [21]

    Ex- pressive whole-body control for humanoid robots,

    X. Cheng, Y . Ji, J. Chen, R. Yang, G. Yang, and X. Wang, “Ex- pressive whole-body control for humanoid robots,”����� �������� ����������������, 2024

    2024

  21. [22]

    Exbody2: Advanced expressive humanoid whole-body control,

    M. Ji, X. Peng, F. Liu, J. Li, G. Yang, X. Cheng, and X. Wang, “Exbody2: Advanced expressive humanoid whole-body control,”����� �������� ����������������, 2024

    2024

  22. [23]

    Learning human-to-humanoid real-time whole-body teleoperation,

    T. He, Z. Luo, W. Xiao, C. Zhang, K. Kitani, C. Liu, and G. Shi, “Learning human-to-humanoid real-time whole-body teleoperation,” in ���� �������� ������������� ���������� �� ����������� ������ ��� ������� ������. IEEE, 2024, pp. 8944–8951

    2024

  23. [24]

    Twist: Teleoperated whole-body imitation system,

    Y . Ze, Z. Chen, J. P. AraÚjo, Z.-a. Cao, X. B. Peng, J. Wu, and C. K. Liu, “Twist: Teleoperated whole-body imitation system,”����� �������� ����������������, 2025

    2025

  24. [25]

    Synthesizing physically plausible human motions in 3d scenes,

    L. Pan, J. Wang, B. Huang, J. Zhang, H. Wang, X. Tang, and Y . Wang, “Synthesizing physically plausible human motions in 3d scenes,” in ���� ������������� ���������� �� �� ������ �����. IEEE, 2024, pp. 1498–1507

    2024

  25. [26]

    Deep imitation learning for humanoid loco-manipulation through human teleoperation,

    M. Seo, S. Han, K. Sim, S. H. Bang, C. Gonzalez, L. Sentis, and Y . Zhu, “Deep imitation learning for humanoid loco-manipulation through human teleoperation,” in���� �������� ���� ������������� ���������� �� �������� ������ �����������. IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–8

    2023

  26. [27]

    Humanplus: Humanoid shadowing and imitation from humans,

    Z. Fu, Q. Zhao, Q. Wu, G. Wetzstein, and C. Finn, “Humanplus: Humanoid shadowing and imitation from humans,”����� �������� ����������������, 2024

    2024

  27. [28]

    Visual imitation enables contextual humanoid control,

    A. Allshire, H. Choi, J. Zhang, D. McAllister, A. Zhang, C. M. Kim, T. Darrell, P. Abbeel, J. Malik, and A. Kanazawa, “Visual imitation enables contextual humanoid control,” in����������� �� ��� ���������� �� ����� �������� ������, 2025

    2025

  28. [29]

    Hdmi: Learning interactive humanoid whole-body control from human videos,

    H. Weng, Y . Li, N. Sobanbabu, Z. Wang, Z. Luo, T. He, D. Ramanan, and G. Shi, “Hdmi: Learning interactive humanoid whole-body control from human videos,”����� �������� ����������������, 2025

    2025

  29. [30]

    Omniretarget: Interaction-preserving data generation for humanoid whole-body loco-manipulation and scene interaction,

    L. Yang, X. Huang, Z. Wu, A. Kanazawa, P. Abbeel, C. Sferrazza, C. K. Liu, R. Duan, and G. Shi, “Omniretarget: Interaction-preserving data generation for humanoid whole-body loco-manipulation and scene interaction,”����� �������� ����������������, 2025

    2025

  30. [31]

    Grab: A dataset of whole-body human grasping of objects,

    O. Taheri, N. Ghorbani, M. J. Black, and D. Tzionas, “Grab: A dataset of whole-body human grasping of objects,” in�������� ���������� �� �������� ������. Springer, 2020, pp. 581–600

    2020

  31. [32]

    Nymeria: A massive collection of multimodal egocentric daily motion in the wild,

    L. Ma, Y . Ye, F. Hong, V . Guzov, Y . Jiang, R. Postyeni, L. Pesqueira, A. Gamino, V . Baiyya, H. J. Kim�� ���, “Nymeria: A massive collection of multimodal egocentric daily motion in the wild,” in�������� ���������� �� �������� ������. Springer, 2024, pp. 445–465

    2024

  32. [33]

    Object motion guided human motion synthesis,

    J. Li, J. Wu, and C. K. Liu, “Object motion guided human motion synthesis,”��� ������ ������, vol. 42, no. 6, 2023

    2023

  33. [34]

    Pyroki: A modular toolkit for robot kinematic optimization,

    C. M. Kim*, B. Yi*, H. Choi, Y . Ma, K. Goldberg, and A. Kanazawa, “Pyroki: A modular toolkit for robot kinematic optimization,” in���� �������� ������������� ���������� �� ����������� ������ ��� ������� ������, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03728

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [35]

    JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman- Milne, and Q. Zhang, “JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://github. com/jax-ml/jax

    2018

  35. [36]

    Smpl: A skinned multi-person linear model,

    M. Loper, N. Mahmood, J. Romero, G. Pons-Moll, and M. J. Black, “Smpl: A skinned multi-person linear model,” in������� �������� ������� ������� ��� ����������� ������ �, 2023, pp. 851–866

    2023

  36. [37]

    Movella Xsens mvn link motion capture system,

    Movella Technologies B.V ., “Movella Xsens mvn link motion capture system,” https://www.movella.com/products/motion-capture/ xsens-mvn-link, 2025, accessed: 2025-11-04

    2025

  37. [38]

    Perpetual humanoid control for real-time simulated avatars,

    Z. Luo, J. Cao, A. W. Winkler, K. Kitani, and W. Xu, “Perpetual humanoid control for real-time simulated avatars,” in������������� ���������� �� �������� ������ ������, 2023

    2023

  38. [39]

    Dynamics-regulated kinematic policy for egocentric pose estimation,

    Z. Luo, R. Hachiuma, Y . Yuan, and K. Kitani, “Dynamics-regulated kinematic policy for egocentric pose estimation,”�������� �� ������ ����������� ���������� �������, vol. 34, pp. 25 019–25 032, 2021

    2021

  39. [40]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in ����������� �� ��� �������� ���������� �� �������� ������ ��� ������� �����������, 2022, pp. 10 684–10 695

    2022

  40. [41]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,

    L. Zhang, A. Rao, and M. Agrawala, “Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,” in����������� �� ��� �������� ������������� ���������� �� �������� ������, 2023, pp. 3836–3847

    2023

  41. [42]

    Classifier-free diffusion guidance,

    J. Ho and T. Salimans, “Classifier-free diffusion guidance,”����� �������� ����������������, 2022

    2022

  42. [43]

    Con- trolmm: Controllable masked motion generation,

    E. Pinyoanuntapong, M. U. Saleem, K. Karunratanakul, P. Wang, H. Xue, C. Chen, C. Guo, J. Cao, J. Ren, and S. Tulyakov, “Con- trolmm: Controllable masked motion generation,”����� �������� ����������������, 2024

    2024

  43. [44]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium,

    H. Martin, R. Hubert, U. Thomas, N. Bernhard, and H. Sepp, “Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium,”�������� �� ������ ����������� ���������� �������, vol. 30, pp. 6626–6637, 2017

    2017

  44. [45]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,

    P. K. Diederik, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,”��� ������, 2014

    2014

  45. [46]

    Isaac lab: A gpu-accelerated simulation framework for multi-modal robot learning,

    M. M. et.al, “Isaac lab: A gpu-accelerated simulation framework for multi-modal robot learning,”����� �������� ����������������, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04831

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [47]

    Prox- imal policy optimization algorithms,

    J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov, “Prox- imal policy optimization algorithms,”����� �������� ����������������, 2017

    2017

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.5 on July 13, 2026.