Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 54 references

This paper claims that primordial curvature over-densities — the 'cosmic ripples' left by inflation — enhance vacuum decay, lowering the Euclidean action and shrinking the nucleated bubble, while under-densities suppress it; if true, first-

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 16:54 UTC pith:XCHTAZ3S

load-bearing objection A real first step on curvature perturbations and vacuum decay, but the headline claim is an extrapolation and the radius statement is wrong in the large-bubble limit. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2604.01516 v2 pith:XCHTAZ3S submitted 2026-04-02 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc

Vacuum bubbles from cosmic ripples

Zi-Yan Yuwen , Rong-Gen Cai , Shao-Jiang Wang This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc MSC 83F0581T20 PACS 98.80.Cq04.62.+v
keywords vacuum decayfalse vacuumcurvature perturbationEuclidean bouncethin-wall approximationfirst-order phase transitionearly universe cosmologybubble nucleation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether the density ripples left over from inflation can change when the early Universe's false vacuum decays. Treating the curvature perturbation as a fixed, spherically symmetric warp of space, it shows in the thin-wall, high-temperature limit that an over-density (positive ζ) both shrinks the radius of the nucleated bubble and lowers the Euclidean action that sets the decay rate, Γ∼e^{−ΔS_E}; an under-density does the reverse. The two extreme cases — bubbles much smaller and much larger than the perturbation's scale — are proven analytically, and finite-temperature numerical solutions with thick walls confirm the trend. The payoff is concrete: decay is faster and earlier in overdense regions, meaning first-order phase transitions can begin inhomogeneously, seeded by the Universe's own density ripples.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that curvature perturbations do not merely shift the geometry around a nucleating bubble; they change whether and when nucleation happens. In the Euclidean instanton description, the decay rate is controlled by ΔS_E, the bounce action relative to the false vacuum. For a metric with curvature perturbation ζ(r), the thin-wall radius condition becomes y(1+rζ')=2σ/ΔV with y=Re^{ζ(R)}, instead of the flat-space R=2σ/ΔV. Because a positive ζ makes R smaller and reduces the physical volume inside the bubble, ΔS_E falls below the flat value in both limits k_*R≪1 and k_*R≫1; a negative ζ raises it. Numerical thick-wall solutions at finite temperature reproduce the same pa

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the Euclidean action difference ΔS_E between the bounce and the false vacuum, which enters the decay rate as Γ∼e^{−ΔS_E}, evaluated on the perturbed background metric ds^2_E = dτ^2 + e^{2ζ(r)}(dr^2 + r^2 dΩ^2). Within the thin-wall approximation the analysis reduces to two quantities: the wall tension σ, fixed by the potential shape, and a radius relation y(1+rζ') = 2σ/ΔV with y=R e^{ζ(R)}. This relation is the hinge: it shows how ζ shifts the stationary bubble radius, and through the physical volume integral V=∫ r^2 e^{3ζ} dr it determines which way ΔS_E moves. A secondary mechanism is the 'friction' term r^{-1}+ζ' in the reparametrised Euclidean equation of motio

Load-bearing premise

The claim that over-densities always enhance vacuum decay rests on assuming, without proof, that the enhancement proven for very small and very large bubbles also holds monotonically for intermediate bubble sizes; the numerics cover only two ripple profiles at one amplitude.

What would settle it

Compute the thin-wall Euclidean action for a positive Gaussian curvature perturbation with the bubble radius set on the perturbation's own scale, k_*R≈1, and compare with the flat-space action; if at that intermediate radius ΔS_E for an over-density exceeds ΔS_E^flat, the generic statement would be false even though both extremes remain as proven.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, first-order phase transitions in the early Universe do not proceed homogeneously: bubbles appear first inside overdense patches and later, or not at all, in underdense voids.
  • Because the nucleation rate depends exponentially on ΔS_E, a reduction of the action by roughly half — as in the thick-wall numerical examples — turns Γ into approximately its square root, so a modest over-density can make a metastable region decay while its flat surroundings remain stuck.
  • The sign of the curvature perturbation becomes a control parameter for the bubble: over-densities nucleate smaller bubbles, under-densities larger ones, which shifts the subsequent bubble-wall expansion and the energy released into the plasma.
  • At zero temperature, a non-constant curvature perturbation breaks the O(4) symmetry of the bounce, so the usual four-dimensional Euclidean picture must be replaced by a genuinely two-dimensional solution; the paper's finite-temperature ladder also finds a critical temperature above which the bounce collapses back to the O(3) form.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If over-dense patches decay first, the gravitational-wave signal from a cosmological phase transition should be computed patch-by-patch rather than from a single homogeneous nucleation temperature; the resulting stochastic background would acquire a contribution whose timing and peak frequency depend on the curvature power spectrum at the transition scale.
  • The oscillating middle stage hints at a crossover from a localized tunnelling instanton to a thermal saddle as the over-density deepens; a numerical scan in the perturbation amplitude at fixed temperature could map this crossover and test whether the two mechanisms connect smoothly.
  • The monotonicity gap — the assumption that intermediate bubble radii interpolate between the two proven extremes — is directly testable: computing the thin-wall ΔS_E at k_*R≈1 for a Gaussian overdensity would either close the gap or show that the generic claim fails while the limits still hold.
  • Because back-reaction of the scalar field on the metric is switched off, the paper's estimates apply when the curvature perturbation is a background; including the bubble's own gravitational effect would matter for over-densities near the black-hole formation threshold, where the two effects could compete.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies vacuum decay of a scalar field in a fixed background with a spherically symmetric curvature perturbation ζ(r). In the high-temperature thin-wall limit, it derives an approximate Euclidean action and analyzes two limiting regimes (k*R≪1 and k*R≫1), concluding that over-densities reduce the Euclidean action (and hence increase the decay rate) while under-densities increase it. It also reports novel oscillating bounce solutions for large perturbations and presents finite-temperature numerical solutions for two specific profiles with amplitude μ=±1/2. The central claim is that over-densities generically trigger earlier vacuum decay.

Significance. If the generic effect is established, the paper identifies a physically interesting mechanism by which primordial curvature perturbations could locally enhance vacuum decay, with potential implications for first-order phase transitions and gravitational-wave signals. The analytical thin-wall treatment in the two limits is a useful step, and the numerical solutions provide some support, although the evidence is not yet conclusive. The paper is also commendable for explicitly stating the unproven interpolation step and for discussing the breaking of O(4) symmetry at zero temperature. However, the abstract's unqualified conclusions go beyond what is demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2 (Eqs. (3.11)–(3.15))] The analytic derivation covers only the two extreme limits k*R≪1 and k*R≫1. The text explicitly admits in Sec. 3.2: 'Without further rigorous mathematical proof, we believe that in general an over-density always results in a smaller Euclidean action...'. This unproven monotone interpolation is load-bearing for the abstract's generic claim. The numerical support in Sec. 4 is too sparse to close the gap: only two profiles (Gaussian and sinc) and one amplitude (μ=±1/2) are shown, with no convergence or error analysis. A non-monotonic interpolation would invalidate the generic conclusion. A proof, or at least a controlled analytic argument plus a systematic numerical scan over the intermediate regime, is required.
  2. [Eq. (3.7) and abstract] The abstract states that an over-density enhances decay 'with a smaller initial bubble radius.' This is not universally supported. Expanding the saddle-point condition Re^ζ (1+Rζ')=R_flat for small μ in the k*R≫1 limit gives R≈R_flat[1−μ(f(x)+x f'(x))], with x=k*R. For decaying profiles (f'<0), the combination f+x f' becomes negative for x≳1, so R is larger for μ>0. Thus the radius behavior in the two limits is opposite: smaller in the k*R≪1 limit (Eq. (3.11)) but larger in the k*R≫1 limit. The claim of a uniformly smaller/larger radius must be qualified or the abstract amended.
  3. [Sec. 4 (Fig. 4)] The numerical results are presented without critical details: no grid spacing, Newton tolerance, or convergence tests are reported, and the action ratios in Fig. 4 have no error bars. The statement that the numerics 'further confirm' the analytic behavior is therefore weaker than claimed. Moreover, only one perturbation amplitude (μ=1/2) is used, so the sign and linearity of the effect are not tested. I would like to see a convergence study and, ideally, a scan over μ and over the intermediate regime k*R~1.
  4. [Sec. 2.2.1 and Fig. 2] The oscillating middle stage is presented as a new phenomenon for large perturbations (μ=1,2,3), but the Euclidean action for these solutions is not computed. Since the paper's central question is the decay rate, the effect of this oscillating stage on ΔS_E is left completely open. If the oscillating solution has a larger action, the conclusion that over-densities generically trigger earlier decay could fail precisely in the large-perturbation regime highlighted in the abstract.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.2.1] The phrase 'the condition r^{-1}+ζ' is always satisfied' should read 'is always positive.' Also, the statement in the left panel of Fig. 2 that 'the condition r^{-1}+ζ' is always satisfied' is unclear without specifying the sign.
  2. [Sec. 3.1] Typographical error: 'asymptomatic behaviours' should be 'asymptotic behaviours'.
  3. [Sec. 4] The code name 'AnyBubble' is missing a space. Also, the notation β_M/β_m and β_i is not defined precisely; please clarify the ladder procedure.
  4. [General] The paper sometimes uses 'over-density' and 'under-density' without specifying whether this refers to the sign of ζ or the local density perturbation. A brief definition would help the reader connect the curvature perturbation amplitude μ to physical density contrasts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the central derivation is self-contained; the admitted interpolation gap is a soundness issue, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central thin-wall result follows from the Euclidean action (3.1)-(3.9) and the saddle-point condition (3.7); the comparison with the flat action in the k*R>>1 limit is an algebraic consequence of the volume inequality (3.14), and no parameter is fitted to the target sign of Delta S_E. The numerical section independently solves the Euclidean EOM (2.11) by Newton iteration on a 2D grid, validates against the public code AnyBubble, and computes the action ratio directly; no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction. The authors' self-citations (e.g., [39]-[42], [50]) are background about PBH formation/sound waves or semiclassical vacuum decay and do not carry the load of the main claim. The only admitted weakness is the monotonic interpolation between the two analytic limits: 'Without further rigorous mathematical proof, we believe that in general an over-density always results in a smaller Euclidean action and thus a higher vacuum decay rate in the thin-wall limit' (Sec. 3.2). This is an explicit soundness gap, not a circular step; it does not assume the conclusion via a fit or definition. (There is also an internal inconsistency: Eq. (3.13) gives Delta S ~ Delta S_flat in the k*R<<1 limit, so the abstract's unqualified 'enhance' statement is not established in that limit; but that is a correctness concern, not circularity.)

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation's input inventory is modest: standard instanton theory, a fixed-background metric ansatz, and a representative FOPT potential. The main added postulate is the unproven monotonic interpolation from limiting cases. Invented entities: none.

free parameters (4)
  • Curvature perturbation amplitude μ = μ = ±1/2 (numerics); μ=1,2,3 (oscillating-stage examples)
    Chosen to model over-/under-dense perturbations of given profiles; not fitted to data but fixes the magnitude of the effect.
  • Curvature perturbation scale k_* = k_* = 1
    Sets unit length in numerics; results are scale-free in this fixed-background calculation.
  • Inverse temperature β = β/2 scanned from 1 to 5; also β=∞, 0 in Fig. 3
    Controls thermal vs quantum regime; chosen ladder for numerical continuation.
  • Potential parameters ΔV, λ = ΔV=1, λ=1
    Choose a thick-wall potential for the numerical demonstration; λ=1 is far from the thin-wall limit.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The background metric remains of the form ds² = -dt² + e^{2ζ(r)}(dr²+r²dΩ²) during the transition, neglecting cosmic expansion and scalar backreaction.
    Sec 2.1-2.2; needed for the Euclidean action (2.10). If backreaction or time dependence of ζ is important, the bounce action changes.
  • domain assumption Wick rotation to the Euclidean metric (2.9) is valid; the system is near thermal equilibrium because expansion is neglected.
    Sec 2.2; without a global timelike Killing vector the Euclidean instanton may be inapplicable; the authors justify by staticity.
  • domain assumption Finite-temperature bounce can be taken O(3)-symmetric, and the high-T limit reduces to a 1D O(3) problem.
    Sec 2.2.1 relies on [35] for O(3) symmetry at finite T.
  • domain assumption Thin-wall conditions δ≪R and negligible friction in the wall, and ζ' small enough that r^{-1}+ζ'>0 everywhere.
    Sec 3; used to derive (3.7) and (3.9); the oscillating middle stage is excluded.
  • ad hoc to paper Monotonic interpolation between limiting cases k*R≪1 and k*R≫1.
    Sec 3.2 'Without further rigorous mathematical proof, we believe...'; load-bearing for the generic conclusion.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12822 in / 12674 out tokens · 121139 ms · 2026-08-02T16:54:19.703878+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate vacuum decays in the early Universe in the presence of curvature perturbations. For sufficiently large perturbations associated with over-densities, we find that the bounce solution develops an oscillating middle stage near the bubble wall. For small perturbations, we analytically show within the thin-wall approximation that an over- (under-) density would enhance (suppress) the vacuum decay rate with a smaller (larger) initial bubble radius. By numerically solving for the bounce solutions and evaluating the corresponding Euclidean action, we further confirm this behaviour in thick-wall cases. Our results indicate that over-densities can generically trigger vacuum decay at an earlier moment.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Mazumdar and G

    A. Mazumdar and G. White,Review of cosmic phase transitions: their significance and experimental signatures,Rept. Prog. Phys.82(2019) 076901, [1811.01948]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    M. B. Hindmarsh, M. L¨ uben, J. Lumma and M. Pauly,Phase transitions in the early universe,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes24(2021) 1, [2008.09136]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Caldwell et al.,Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics,Gen

    R. Caldwell et al.,Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics,Gen. Rel. Grav.54(2022) 156, [2203.07972]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking, I. G. Moss and J. M. Stewart,Bubble Collisions in the Very Early Universe,Phys. Rev. D26(1982) 2681

    1982

  5. [5]

    Witten,Cosmic Separation of Phases,Phys

    E. Witten,Cosmic Separation of Phases,Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 272–285

    1984

  6. [6]

    Jinno and M

    R. Jinno and M. Takimoto,Gravitational waves from bubble collisions: An analytic derivation,Phys. Rev.D95(2017) 024009, [1605.01403]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    C. J. Hogan,Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.218(1986) 629–636

    1986

  8. [8]

    Hindmarsh,Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe,Phys

    M. Hindmarsh,Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 071301, [1608.04735]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Hindmarsh and M

    M. Hindmarsh and M. Hijazi,Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions in the Sound Shell Model,JCAP1912(2019) 062, [1909.10040]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Cai, S.-J

    R.-G. Cai, S.-J. Wang and Z.-Y. Yuwen,Hydrodynamic sound shell model,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L021502, [2305.00074]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2837–2851, [astro-ph/9310044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  12. [12]

    Cai and S.-J

    R.-G. Cai and S.-J. Wang,Energy budget of cosmological first-order phase transition in FLR W background,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.61(2018) 080411, [1803.03002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, D. Vagie and G. White,Phase Transitions in an Expanding Universe: Stochastic Gravitational Waves in Standard and Non-Standard Histories, JCAP01(2021) 001, [2007.08537]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Giombi, J

    L. Giombi, J. Dahl and M. Hindmarsh,Acoustic gravitational waves beyond leading order in bubble over Hubble radius,2504.08037

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Jinno, J

    R. Jinno, J. Kume and M. Yamada,Super-slow phase transition catalyzed by BHs and the birth of baby BHs,Phys. Lett. B849(2024) 138465, [2310.06901]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Yuwen, C

    Z.-Y. Yuwen, C. Joana, S.-J. Wang and R.-G. Cai,Bubbles kick off primordial black holes to form more binaries,Phys. Rev. Res.7(2025) 023180, [2406.05838]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Wang, Y.-l

    H. Wang, Y.-l. Zhang and T. Suyama,Nearly Monochromatic Primordial Black Holes as total Dark Matter from Bubble Collapse,2510.19233

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    Devoto, S

    F. Devoto, S. Devoto, L. Di Luzio and G. Ridolfi,False vacuum decay: an introductory review,J. Phys. G49(2022) 103001, [2205.03140]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    S. R. Coleman and F. De Luccia,Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay, Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 3305

    1980

  20. [20]

    S. W. Hawking and I. G. Moss,Supercooled Phase Transitions in the Very Early Universe,Phys. Lett. B110(1982) 35–38

    1982

  21. [21]

    I. G. Moss,BLACK HOLE BUBBLES,Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 1333

    1985

  22. [22]

    W. A. Hiscock,CAN BLACK HOLES NUCLEATE V ACUUM PHASE TRANSITIONS?,Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 1161–1170

    1987

  23. [23]

    Salvio, A

    A. Salvio, A. Strumia, N. Tetradis and A. Urbano,On gravitational and thermal corrections to vacuum decay,JHEP09(2016) 054, [1608.02555]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Vicentini,New bounds on vacuum decay in de Sitter space,2205.11036

    S. Vicentini,New bounds on vacuum decay in de Sitter space,2205.11036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Antoniadis, D

    I. Antoniadis, D. Bielli, A. Chatrabhuti and H. Isono,Thin-wall vacuum decay in the presence of a compact dimension,JHEP09(2024) 011, [2405.16920]

    arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Gregory, I

    R. Gregory, I. G. Moss and B. Withers,Black holes as bubble nucleation sites,JHEP 03(2014) 081, [1401.0017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Burda, R

    P. Burda, R. Gregory and I. Moss,Gravity and the stability of the Higgs vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 071303, [1501.04937]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Burda, R

    P. Burda, R. Gregory and I. Moss,Vacuum metastability with black holes,JHEP08 (2015) 114, [1503.07331]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Oshita, K

    N. Oshita, K. Ueda and M. Yamaguchi,Vacuum decays around spinning black holes, JHEP01(2020) 015, [1909.01378]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    S. R. Coleman, V. Glaser and A. Martin,Action Minima Among Solutions to a Class of Euclidean Scalar Field Equations,Commun. Math. Phys.58(1978) 211–221

    1978

  31. [31]

    A. D. Linde,Fate of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature: Theory and Applications,Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 37–40

    1981

  32. [32]

    Masoumi, K

    A. Masoumi, K. D. Olum and J. M. Wachter,Approximating tunneling rates in multi-dimensional field spaces,JCAP10(2017) 022, [1702.00356]. – 17 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Guada, M

    V. Guada, M. Nemevˇ sek and M. Pintar,FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions,Comput. Phys. Commun.256(2020) 107480, [2002.00881]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    C. L. Wainwright,CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields,Comput. Phys. Commun. 183(2012) 2006–2013, [1109.4189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Shoji and M

    Y. Shoji and M. Yamaguchi,Symmetry of Bounce Solutions at Finite Temperature, 2511.05950

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Masoumi and E

    A. Masoumi and E. J. Weinberg,Bounces with O(3) x O(2) symmetry,Phys. Rev. D 86(2012) 104029, [1207.3717]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  37. [37]

    B.-H. Lee, W. Lee, D.-h. Yeom and L. Yin,Gravitational waves from the vacuum decay with LISA *,Chin. Phys. C46(2022) 075101, [2106.07430]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Shibata and M

    M. Shibata and M. Sasaki,Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 084002, [gr-qc/9905064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  39. [39]

    Joana and Z.-Y

    C. Joana and Z.-Y. Yuwen,Primordial Black Holes from Primordial Voids, 2510.11611

    arXiv

  40. [40]

    X.-X. Zeng, Z. Ning, Z.-Y. Yuwen, S.-J. Wang, H. Deng and R.-G. Cai,Relic gravitational waves from primordial gravitational collapses,2504.11275

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Ning, X.-X

    Z. Ning, X.-X. Zeng, Z.-Y. Yuwen, S.-J. Wang, H. Deng and R.-G. Cai,Sound waves from primordial black hole formations,2504.12243

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Ning, Z.-Y

    Z. Ning, Z.-Y. Yuwen, X.-X. Zeng, R.-G. Cai and S.-J. Wang,Acoustic gravitational waves from primordial curvature perturbations,2512.21151

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    J. M. Bardeen, J. R. Bond, N. Kaiser and A. S. Szalay,The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields,Astrophys. J.304(1986) 15–61

    1986

  44. [44]

    C.-M. Yoo, T. Harada, J. Garriga and K. Kohri,Primordial black hole abundance from random Gaussian curvature perturbations and a local density threshold,PTEP 2018(2018) 123E01, [1805.03946]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    C.-M. Yoo, T. Harada, S. Hirano and K. Kohri,Abundance of Primordial Black Holes in Peak Theory for an Arbitrary Power Spectrum,PTEP2021(2021) 013E02, [2008.02425]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Musco,Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturbations,Phys

    I. Musco,Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 123524, [1809.02127]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Lewicki and V

    M. Lewicki and V. Vaskonen,On bubble collisions in strongly supercooled phase transitions,Phys. Dark Univ.30(2020) 100672, [1912.00997]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    A. H. Guth and E. J. Weinberg,Could the Universe Have Recovered from a Slow First Order Phase Transition?,Nucl. Phys. B212(1983) 321–364

    1983

  49. [49]

    M. S. Turner, E. J. Weinberg and L. M. Widrow,Bubble nucleation in first order – 18 – inflation and other cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 2384–2403

    1992

  50. [50]

    Wang,Occurrence of semiclassical vacuum decay,Phys

    S.-J. Wang,Occurrence of semiclassical vacuum decay,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 096019, [1909.11196]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    S. R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2929–2936

    1977

  52. [52]

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and S. R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1762–1768

    1977

  53. [53]

    A. D. Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature,Nucl. Phys. B216 (1983) 421

    1983

  54. [54]

    E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory. Oxford University Press, 2009, 10.1017/9781009290036. – 19 –

    doi:10.1017/9781009290036 2009