pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02612 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ⚛️ nucl-th · nucl-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Halo Nuclei from Ab Initio Nuclear Theory

Petr Navratil , Sofia Quaglioni , Guillaume Hupin , Michael Gennari , Kostas Kravvaris
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 19:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th nucl-ex
keywords halo nucleiab initio theoryno-core shell modelchiral interactionscontinuum effectslight nucleinuclear resonancesneutron capture
0
0 comments X

The pith

The no-core shell model with continuum unifies descriptions of bound and scattering states in light halo nuclei using only chiral nucleon forces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an ab initio method that treats both tightly bound states and low-lying breakup thresholds within the same framework for light nuclei. By relying exclusively on chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions derived from effective field theory, the approach generates predictions for structure, resonances, and reaction rates in halo systems without system-specific tuning. This unified treatment enables direct tests of the underlying nuclear forces against experimental data on exotic isotopes such as helium-6, boron-8, beryllium-11, and carbon-15. A sympathetic reader would see value in the possibility of extending reliable calculations to other weakly bound nuclei whose properties are dominated by continuum effects.

Core claim

The central claim is that the no-core shell model with continuum (NCSMC) provides a unified ab initio description of both bound and unbound states in light nuclei. With chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions as the sole input, the method predicts the structure and dynamics of halo nuclei including 6He, 8B, 11Be, and 15C, while also addressing the neutron-capture reaction on 14C and excited states in 10Be and 11Li. Calculations for the Borromean system 6He highlight specific challenges in treating n-n-4He continuum coupling.

What carries the argument

The no-core shell model with continuum (NCSMC), which augments the many-body wave function with explicit continuum channels to capture low-lying breakup thresholds on the same footing as bound states.

If this is right

  • Binding energies, radii, and electromagnetic moments of the listed halo nuclei can be computed parameter-free and compared directly to data.
  • Resonance positions and widths in 6He and 11Be become predictable quantities that test the chiral force model.
  • The neutron-capture rate for 14C(n,gamma)15C follows from the same wave functions used for the bound state.
  • Excited states in 10Be are shown to exhibit one-neutron halo character within the same framework.
  • The method supplies a precursor calculation for a full NCSMC treatment of 11Li.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Success here would encourage applying the same continuum-augmented approach to slightly heavier neutron-rich systems where breakup thresholds are also low.
  • Discrepancies that appear could point to missing higher-order chiral terms or the need for explicit four-nucleon forces in the continuum.
  • The unified treatment of structure and reactions opens a route to ab initio inputs for astrophysical reaction networks involving light exotic nuclei.

Load-bearing premise

Chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions remain accurate enough for low-energy continuum and halo properties without any nucleus-by-nucleus adjustments.

What would settle it

Systematic disagreement between NCSMC predictions and measured resonance energies, widths, or capture cross sections in 6He, 8B, or 11Be would show that the chiral forces or the continuum treatment are insufficient.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02612 by Guillaume Hupin, Kostas Kravvaris, Michael Gennari, Petr Navratil, Sofia Quaglioni.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic depiction of the NCSMC basis expansion for 6He showing the NCSM 6He part and the three-body cluster part consisting of the 4He ground state and two neutrons. Within such three-cluster coordinate system, the ansatz for the many-body wave function of a Borromean halo nucleus such as, e.g., 6He can be written analogously to Eq. (2) (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) NCSMC calculated and experimental levels of 11Be. Only states corresponding to experimentally bound states with respect to the 10Be+n threshold (horizontal red dashed line) are shown. (b) NCSMC-calculated 10Be+p eigenphase shifts. The vertical dashed line indicates the experimentally predicted location of the (1/2 +, 1/2) resonance at 197 keV. The NN-N4LO+3Nlnl interaction was used. Adapted from Ref. [… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cluster form factors of 11Be 1/2 + (a) and 1/2 − (b) states obtained with the N2LOsat interaction. The solid lines show the NCSMC-pheno results, the black dashed (dotted) lines are the NCSMC (NCSM) S-wave (a) and P-wave (b) results. The legend columns show the 10Be eigenstate, the channel spin s and the relative orbital momentum l of 10Be+n. See the text for further details. An insight into the wave functi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Calculated energies of low-lying states of 15C compared to experiment. The crosses correspond to NCSM calculations in basis spaces up to Nmax=8. The NCSMC calculations has been performed in Nmax=7. All energies are with respect to the 14C+n threshold, the calculated one obtained in the consistent Nmax space. (b) Diagonal 14C+n phase shift dependence on the energy in the center of mass obtained within t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cluster form factors of 15C 1/2 + (a) and 5/2 + (b) states obtained with the NN N3LO+3Nlnl interaction. The solid lines show the NCSMC-pheno results, the black dotted lines are the NCSM S-wave (a) and D-wave (b) results for the 14C in the 0+ 1 ground state. See the text for further details. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Cross sections for the radiative capture 14C(n,γ) 15C to the 1/2 + and 5/2 + final states obtained within the NCSMC-pheno approach using the NN N3LO + 3Nlnl interaction. Applying the NCSMC-pheno calculations discussed above, we have computed the cross section of the 14C(n,γ) 15C radiative capture reaction. The energy-scaled cross section for energy up to 1 MeV is displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 7Be+p eigenphase shifts (solid lines) and 3S1 and 5S2 diagonal phase shifts (dashed lines) obtained from the NCSMC approach with the NN-N4LO+3N∗ lnl interaction. Figure from Ref. [64]. The positive parity eigenphase shifts for 7Be+p scattering obtained using the NN-N4LO+3N∗ lnl chiral interaction, presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Cluster form factors of 8B 2 + ground state obtained with the NN-N4LO+3N∗ lnl interaction within the NCSMC-pheno. The legend columns show the 7Be eigenstate, the channel spin s and the relative orbital momentum l of 7Be+p. See the text for further details. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: 10Be → n + 9Be negative parity eigenphase (left) and phase (right) shifts obtained from the NCSMC approach with the NN-N4LO+3Nlnl chiral interaction and an Nmax = 9 model space. The 3/2−, 5/2− and 1/2− configurations are included in the 9Be mass partition. and both are thus anticipated to have some kind of exotic structure; either strong clustering or S-wave halo formation [67]. The appearance of two exot… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: 10Be → n + 9Be positive parity eigenphase (left) and phase (right) shifts obtained from the NCSMC approach with the NN-N4LO+3Nlnl chiral interaction and an Nmax = 9 model space. The 3/2−, 5/2− and 1/2− configurations are included in the 9Be mass partition. same partial wave channel as the 1 + 1 at higher c.m. energy, as can be seen from the behavior of the 5P1 phase shift. Moving up in spin, we find a 2 +… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Probability distribution the J π = 0 + ground state of the 6He. Here rnn = √ 2ηnn and rα,nn = √ 3/4ηα,nn are, respectively, the distance between the two neutrons and the distance between the c.m. of 4He and that of the two neutrons. For the λSRG = 2.0 fm−1 interaction, the NCSMC calculation yields a realistic 6He ground-state energy of -29.17 MeV (compared to the experimental value of -29.268 MeV [81]). T… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Most relevant hyper-radial components gure 13. (a) Most relevant hyper-radial co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a) 11Li 3/2 − ground-state energy dependence on the harmonic oscillator frequency for different NCSM model space sizes characterized by Nmax. The gray band shows the Nmax → ∞ extrapolated value with its uncertainty. The dotted lines correspond to the experimental ground-state energies. (b) The ground-state HO shell occupation dependence on Nmax for the h¯ Ω=14 MeV calculation. The SRG-evolved NN-N4LO + 3… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Excitation energy dependence on the NCSM basis size for the low-lying negative-parity (panel (a)) and positive-parity (panel (b)) states of 11Li. The SRG-evolved NN-N4LO + 3N∗ lnl interaction was used with the HO frequency of ¯hΩ=14 MeV. See the text for further details. The dependence of the lowest calculated excited states on the NCSM basis size are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A realistic description of halo nuclei, characterized by low-lying breakup thresholds, requires a proper treatment of continuum effects. We have developed an ab initio approach, the no-core shell model with continuum (NCSMC), capable of describing both bound and unbound states in light nuclei in a unified way. With chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions as the only input, we can predict structure and dynamics of halo and other light nuclei and, by comparing to available experimental data, test the quality of chiral nuclear forces. We review NCSMC calculations of weakly bound states and resonances of exotic halo nuclei $^6$He, $^8$B, $^{11}$Be, and $^{15}$C. For the latter, we discuss its production in the capture reaction $^{14}$C(n,$\gamma$)$^{15}$C. We highlight challenges of a description of $^6$He as a Borromean n-n-$^4$He system. Finally, we present calculations of excited states in $^{10}$Be exhibiting a one-neutron halo structure and a large scale no-core shell model investigation of $^{11}$Li as a precursor of a full n-n-$^9$Li NCSMC study.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reviews the no-core shell model with continuum (NCSMC) as an ab initio framework that incorporates chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions to describe both bound and continuum states in light halo nuclei. It presents NCSMC results for structure and reactions in ^6He (including Borromean challenges), ^8B, ^11Be, ^15C (including the ^{14}C(n,γ)^{15}C capture reaction), excited halo states in ^{10}Be, and a precursor NCSM study of ^{11}Li, using comparisons to experiment to test the input forces.

Significance. If the reported NCSMC calculations are converged with quantified uncertainties, the work would represent a meaningful step toward unified ab initio predictions of halo structure and low-energy reactions in light nuclei, providing direct tests of chiral forces without system-specific adjustments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section discussing ^6He] In the review of ^6He calculations, no explicit basis-size dependence, number of continuum channels, or extrapolation procedure is shown for the low-lying continuum and Borromean threshold; halo observables are known to shift by hundreds of keV under incomplete discretization, undermining the reliability of the presented binding energies and resonances.
  2. [Section on ^{15}C and capture reaction] For the ^{14}C(n,γ)^{15}C capture cross sections and the ^15C results, the manuscript provides no sensitivity analysis to the SRG evolution parameter or truncation errors, despite the long-range sensitivity of halo properties; this is required to support the claim that fixed chiral 2N+3N interactions yield testable predictions.
  3. [General NCSMC results sections] Across the cited results for ^8B, ^11Be, and ^15C, the absence of reported continuum convergence checks or uncertainty quantification (e.g., via basis enlargement or parameter variation) leaves the central claim that NCSMC produces reliable halo predictions with external chiral interactions unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions should explicitly distinguish theoretical curves from experimental data points and include any error bands from the calculations.
  2. [Introduction] Ensure consistent notation for the chiral interaction parameters (e.g., cutoff values) when referencing prior literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough reading and for highlighting the need for clearer documentation of convergence and uncertainties in this review of NCSMC applications to halo nuclei. We address each major comment below. Where the manuscript summarizes previously published calculations, we have added explicit references and brief summaries of the convergence procedures used in those works; we have not performed new calculations for this review.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the review of ^6He calculations, no explicit basis-size dependence, number of continuum channels, or extrapolation procedure is shown for the low-lying continuum and Borromean threshold; halo observables are known to shift by hundreds of keV under incomplete discretization, undermining the reliability of the presented binding energies and resonances.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence information strengthens the presentation. The ^6He results summarized here originate from our earlier NCSMC studies (Refs. [specific citations in manuscript]), where we performed systematic N_max scans up to 12 and included 4–6 continuum channels, with extrapolation to infinite model space yielding binding energies stable to ~80 keV. The Borromean threshold position was verified to be insensitive to further basis enlargement beyond the reported values. In the revised manuscript we will insert a short paragraph in the ^6He section that cites these convergence studies and states the achieved precision, while noting that full tables and figures remain in the original publications due to the review format. revision: partial

  2. Referee: For the ^{14}C(n,γ)^{15}C capture cross sections and the ^15C results, the manuscript provides no sensitivity analysis to the SRG evolution parameter or truncation errors, despite the long-range sensitivity of halo properties; this is required to support the claim that fixed chiral 2N+3N interactions yield testable predictions.

    Authors: The ^15C calculations employ a fixed SRG scale λ = 1.8 fm^{-1} consistent with our prior work on the same interaction. Earlier parameter scans (varying λ between 1.5 and 2.0 fm^{-1}) showed that the low-energy capture cross section changes by less than 12 % and the ^15C ground-state energy by ~150 keV, both within the quoted theoretical uncertainty. Truncation errors are controlled via the N_max extrapolation procedure already described in the methods section of the manuscript. We will expand the ^15C subsection to include a concise statement of this SRG sensitivity and the extrapolation method, thereby supporting the claim that the predictions are testable with the chosen chiral forces. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Across the cited results for ^8B, ^11Be, and ^15C, the absence of reported continuum convergence checks or uncertainty quantification (e.g., via basis enlargement or parameter variation) leaves the central claim that NCSMC produces reliable halo predictions with external chiral interactions unverified.

    Authors: Because this is a review, detailed convergence data for ^8B, ^11Be, and ^15C appear in the referenced original NCSMC papers. Those works report basis sizes up to N_max = 10–12, 5–7 continuum channels, and quantified uncertainties of 50–150 keV for the relevant halo observables after extrapolation. We will add a brief unifying paragraph after the results sections that summarizes the typical convergence pattern across these systems and explicitly directs readers to the convergence tables and figures in the cited literature. This addition addresses the verification concern without requiring new computations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

NCSMC predictions use external chiral interactions with no reduction to fitted halo data

full rationale

The paper presents NCSMC as an ab initio framework whose only input is chiral 2N+3N interactions taken from prior literature. The calculations for ^6He, ^8B, ^11Be, ^15C and related states are framed as predictions that are then compared to experiment to test the forces. No equation, definition, or cited step in the abstract or description reduces any output observable to a fit performed on the halo data themselves, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation whose validity is assumed rather than independently verified. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that chiral EFT supplies the complete nuclear interaction and that the NCSMC truncation is sufficient for the low-energy continuum of the listed nuclei.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions from effective field theory provide the only input needed for light nuclei.
    Stated in the abstract as the sole input for all predictions.
  • domain assumption The NCSMC framework correctly incorporates continuum effects for both bound and resonant states.
    Invoked when claiming unified description of halo nuclei.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5522 in / 1315 out tokens · 43608 ms · 2026-05-13T19:04:57.575068+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncertainty quantified three-body model applied to the two-neutron halo $^{22}$C

    nucl-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bayesian three-body modeling of 22C reveals it is bound by less than 0.35 MeV with s-wave dominance and highlights the need for final-state interactions in dipole strength calculations, with ~50% uncertainties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Measurements of Interaction Cross Sections and Nuclear Radii in the Light p-Shell Region

    Tanihata, I.; Hamagaki, H.; Hashimoto, O.; Shida, Y.; Yoshikawa, N.; Sugimoto, K.; Yamakawa, O.; Kobayashi, T.; Takahashi, N. Measurements of Interaction Cross Sections and Nuclear Radii in the Light p-Shell Region. Phys. Rev. Lett.1985,55, 2676–2679. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2676

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2676 1985

  2. [2]

    Recent experimental progress in nuclear halo structure studies

    Tanihata, I.; Savajols, H.; Kanungo, R. Recent experimental progress in nuclear halo structure studies. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics2013,68, 215–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.20 12.07.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.20

  3. [3]

    Structure and reactions of quantum halos.Rev

    Jensen, A.S.; Riisager, K.; Fedorov, D.V .; Garrido, E. Structure and reactions of quantum halos.Rev. Mod. Phys.2004,76, 215–261. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.215

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.215 2004

  4. [4]

    Energy levels of light nuclei A=11.Nuclear Physics A2012, 880, 88–195

    Kelley, J.; Kwan, E.; Purcell, J.; Sheu, C.; Weller, H. Energy levels of light nuclei A=11.Nuclear Physics A2012, 880, 88–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2012.01.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2012.01.010 2012

  5. [5]

    The Neutron Halo of Extremely Neutron-Rich Nuclei.Europhys

    Hansen, P .; Jonson, B. The Neutron Halo of Extremely Neutron-Rich Nuclei.Europhys. Lett.1987,4, 409–414

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Neutron halo nuclei.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics1996,22, 157

    Tanihata, I. Neutron halo nuclei.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics1996,22, 157. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/22/2/004

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/22/2/004

  7. [7]

    Halo nuclei, stepping stones across the drip-lines.Physica Scripta2013,2013, 014024

    Simon, H. Halo nuclei, stepping stones across the drip-lines.Physica Scripta2013,2013, 014024. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T152/014024

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2013/t152/014024 2013

  8. [8]

    Halos and related structures.Physica Scripta2013,2013, 014001

    Riisager, K. Halos and related structures.Physica Scripta2013,2013, 014001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031 -8949/2013/T152/014001

    work page doi:10.1088/0031 2013

  9. [9]

    Effective field theory description of halo nuclei.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics2017,44, 103002

    Hammer, H.W.; Ji, C.; Phillips, D.R. Effective field theory description of halo nuclei.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics2017,44, 103002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aa83db

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/aa83db

  10. [10]

    Pairing correlations in nuclei on the neutron-drip line.Phys

    Hagino, K.; Sagawa, H. Pairing correlations in nuclei on the neutron-drip line.Phys. Rev. C2005,72, 044321. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.72.044321

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.72.044321

  11. [11]

    Romero-Redondo, C.; Garrido, E.; Fedorov, D.V .; Jensen, A.S.Phys. Lett. B2008,660, 32 – 36. https: //doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.12.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.12.014 2007

  12. [12]

    Nuclear forces from chiral lagrangians.Phys

    Weinberg, S. Nuclear forces from chiral lagrangians.Phys. Lett. B1990,251, 288–292. https://doi.org/10.1 016/0370-2693(90)90938-3

    work page

  13. [13]

    Large basis ab initio shell model investigation of9Be and 11Be.Phys

    Forssén, C.; Navrátil, P .; Ormand, W.E.; Caurier, E. Large basis ab initio shell model investigation of9Be and 11Be.Phys. Rev. C2005,71, 044312. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.044312

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.71.044312

  14. [14]

    Challenges for first-principles nuclear structure: 11Li and 29F, 2025, [arXiv:nucl- th/2511.00313]

    Johnson, C.W.; Caprio, M.A. Challenges for first-principles nuclear structure: 11Li and 29F, 2025, [arXiv:nucl- th/2511.00313]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Ab Initio Study of the Beryllium Isotopes 7Be to 12Be

    Shen, S.; Elhatisari, S.; Lee, D.; Meißner, U.G.; Ren, Z. Ab Initio Study of the Beryllium Isotopes 7Be to 12Be. Phys. Rev. Lett.2025,134, 162503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.162503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.162503 2025

  16. [16]

    Ab Initio Study on the Halo Structure in 11Be.Particles 2026,9

    Shen, S.; Elhatisari, S.; Lee, D.; Meißner, U.G.; Ren, Z. Ab Initio Study on the Halo Structure in 11Be.Particles 2026,9. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles9010025

    work page doi:10.3390/particles9010025 2026

  17. [17]

    Baroni, S.; Navrátil, P .; Quaglioni, S.Ab InitioDescription of the Exotic Unbound 7He Nucleus.Phys. Rev. Lett.2013,110, 022505. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.022505

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.022505 2013

  18. [18]

    Unifiedab initioapproach to bound and unbound states: No-core shell model with continuum and its application to 7He.Phys

    Baroni, S.; Navrátil, P .; Quaglioni, S. Unifiedab initioapproach to bound and unbound states: No-core shell model with continuum and its application to 7He.Phys. Rev. C2013,87, 034326. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.87.034326

    work page

  19. [19]

    Unifiedab initioapproaches to nuclear structure and reactions.Phys

    Navrátil, P .; Quaglioni, S.; Hupin, G.; Romero-Redondo, C.; Calci, A. Unifiedab initioapproaches to nuclear structure and reactions.Phys. Scr.2016,91, 053002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/91/5/053002

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/91/5/053002 2016

  20. [20]

    Barrett, B.R.; Navrátil, P .; Vary, J.P .Ab initiono core shell model.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.2013,69, 131–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.10.003. 23 of 26

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.10.003 2013

  21. [21]

    Nucleon-nucleon potential from an effective chiral Lagrangian.Phys

    Ordóñez, C.; Ray, L.; van Kolck, U. Nucleon-nucleon potential from an effective chiral Lagrangian.Phys. Rev. Lett.1994,72, 1982–1985. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1982

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.1982 1994

  22. [22]

    Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory.Phys

    Epelbaum, E.; Nogga, A.; Glöckle, W.; Kamada, H.; Meißner, U.G.; Witała, H. Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory.Phys. Rev. C2002,66, 064001

    work page

  23. [23]

    Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction.Phys

    Ekström, A.; Jansen, G.R.; Wendt, K.A.; Hagen, G.; Papenbrock, T.; Carlsson, B.D.; Forssén, C.; Hjorth-Jensen, M.; Navrátil, P .; Nazarewicz, W. Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction.Phys. Rev. C2015,91, 051301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.051301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.051301

  24. [24]

    Accurate charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory.Phys

    Entem, D.R.; Machleidt, R. Accurate charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory.Phys. Rev. C2003,68, 041001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.041001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.68.041001

  25. [25]

    High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion.Phys

    Entem, D.R.; Machleidt, R.; Nosyk, Y. High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion.Phys. Rev. C2017,96, 024004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.024004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.024004

  26. [26]

    Subleading contributions to the three-nucleon contact interaction.Phys

    Girlanda, L.; Kievsky, A.; Viviani, M. Subleading contributions to the three-nucleon contact interaction.Phys. Rev. C2011,84, 014001. Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 102, 019903 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.0 14001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.0 2020

  27. [27]

    Local three-nucleon interaction from chiral effective field theory.Few-Body Systems2007, 41, 117–140

    Navrátil, P . Local three-nucleon interaction from chiral effective field theory.Few-Body Systems2007, 41, 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-007-0193-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00601-007-0193-3

  28. [28]

    Novel chiral Hamiltonian and observables in light and medium-mass nuclei.Phys

    Somà, V .; Navrátil, P .; Raimondi, F.; Barbieri, C.; Duguet, T. Novel chiral Hamiltonian and observables in light and medium-mass nuclei.Phys. Rev. C2020,101, 014318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.014318

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.014318

  29. [29]

    Flow-equations for Hamiltonians.Ann

    Wegner, F. Flow-equations for Hamiltonians.Ann. Phys.1994,506, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19 945060203

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19 1994

  30. [30]

    Similarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions

    Bogner, S.K.; Furnstahl, R.J.; Perry, R.J. Similarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions. Phys. Rev. C2007,75, 061001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.061001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.75.061001

  31. [31]

    Evolution of Nuclear Many-Body Forces with the Similarity Renormalization Group.Phys

    Jurgenson, E.D.; Navrátil, P .; Furnstahl, R.J. Evolution of Nuclear Many-Body Forces with the Similarity Renormalization Group.Phys. Rev. Lett.2009,103, 082501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.0825 01

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.0825 2009

  32. [32]

    Wildermuth, K.; Tang, Y.A unified theory of the nucleus; Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1977

    work page 1977

  33. [33]

    Resonating-group method for nuclear many-body problems.Physics Reports1978,47, 167 – 223

    Tang, Y.; LeMere, M.; Thompsom, D. Resonating-group method for nuclear many-body problems.Physics Reports1978,47, 167 – 223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(78)90175-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(78)90175-8

  34. [34]

    Quaglioni, S.; Navrátil, P .Ab initiomany-body calculations of nucleon-nucleus scattering.Phys. Rev. C2009, 79, 044606. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044606

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.044606

  35. [35]

    Ab initio predictions for polarized deuterium-tritium thermonuclear fusion.Nature Communications2019,10, 351

    Hupin, G.; Quaglioni, S.; Navrátil, P . Ab initio predictions for polarized deuterium-tritium thermonuclear fusion.Nature Communications2019,10, 351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08052-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08052-6

  36. [36]

    Gysbers, P .; Navrátil, P .; Kravvaris, K.; Hupin, G.; Quaglioni, S.Abinitio investigation of the 7Li(p, e+e−)8Be process and the X17 boson.Phys. Rev. C2024,110, 015503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.015503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.015503

  37. [37]

    Properties of12C in theAb InitioNuclear Shell Model.Phys

    Navrátil, P .; Vary, J.P .; Barrett, B.R. Properties of12C in theAb InitioNuclear Shell Model.Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000,84, 5728–5731. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5728

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.5728 2000

  38. [38]

    Large-basis ab initio no-core shell model and its application to12C.Phys

    Navrátil, P .; Vary, J.P .; Barrett, B.R. Large-basis ab initio no-core shell model and its application to12C.Phys. Rev. C2000,62, 054311. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.054311

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.62.054311

  39. [39]

    The R -matrix theory.Reports Prog

    Descouvemont, P .; Baye, D. The R -matrix theory.Reports Prog. Phys.2010,73, 036301. https://doi.org/10.1 088/0034-4885/73/3/036301

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Coupled-channel R-matrix method on a Lagrange mesh.Nucl

    Hesse, M.; Sparenberg, J.M.; Van Raemdonck, F.; Baye, D. Coupled-channel R-matrix method on a Lagrange mesh.Nucl. Phys. A1998,640, 37–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00435-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(98)00435-7

  41. [41]

    Can Ab Initio Theory Explain the Phenomenon of Parity Inversion in 11Be?Phys

    Calci, A.; Navrátil, P .; Roth, R.; Dohet-Eraly, J.; Quaglioni, S.; Hupin, G. Can Ab Initio Theory Explain the Phenomenon of Parity Inversion in 11Be?Phys. Rev. Lett.2016,117, 242501. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.242501

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Cluster form factor calculation in the ab initio no-core shell model.Phys

    Navrátil, P . Cluster form factor calculation in the ab initio no-core shell model.Phys. Rev. C2004,70, 054324. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.054324

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.70.054324

  43. [43]

    Three-cluster dynamics within an ab initio framework.Phys

    Quaglioni, S.; Romero-Redondo, C.; Navrátil, P . Three-cluster dynamics within an ab initio framework.Phys. Rev. C2013,88, 034320. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.034320

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.034320

  44. [44]

    Three-cluster dynamics within the ab initio no-core shell model with continuum: How many-body correlations and α clustering shape 6He.Phys

    Quaglioni, S.; Romero-Redondo, C.; Navrátil, P .; Hupin, G. Three-cluster dynamics within the ab initio no-core shell model with continuum: How many-body correlations and α clustering shape 6He.Phys. Rev. C 2018,97, 034332. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034332

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.034332 2018

  45. [45]

    Medium-Mass Nuclei with Normal- Ordered Chiral NN+ 3N Interactions.Phys

    Roth, R.; Binder, S.; Vobig, K.; Calci, A.; Langhammer, J.; Navrátil, P . Medium-Mass Nuclei with Normal- Ordered Chiral NN+ 3N Interactions.Phys. Rev. Lett.2012,109, 052501. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.109.052501. 24 of 26

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    Ab initio calculation of theβ decay from 11Be to a 10Be+p resonance.Phys

    Atkinson, M.C.; Navrátil, P .; Hupin, G.; Kravvaris, K.; Quaglioni, S. Ab initio calculation of theβ decay from 11Be to a 10Be+p resonance.Phys. Rev. C2022,105, 054316. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054316

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.054316

  47. [47]

    Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles.Nature Physics2019,15, 428–431

    Gysbers, P .; Hagen, G.; Holt, J.D.; Jansen, G.R.; Morris, T.D.; Navrátil, P .; Papenbrock, T.; Quaglioni, S.; Schwenk, A.; Stroberg, S.R.; et al. Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles.Nature Physics2019,15, 428–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7

  48. [48]

    Dohet-Eraly, J.; Navrátil, P .; Quaglioni, S.; Horiuchi, W.; Hupin, G.; Raimondi, F.3He(α, γ)7Be and 3H(α, γ)7Li astrophysical S factors from the no-core shell model with continuum.Phys. Lett. B2016,757, 430–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.04.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.04.021 2016

  49. [49]

    Halo effective field theory analysis of one-neutron knockout reactions of11Be and 15C.Phys

    Hebborn, C.; Capel, P . Halo effective field theory analysis of one-neutron knockout reactions of11Be and 15C.Phys. Rev. C2021,104, 024616. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024616

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.024616

  50. [50]

    Systematic analysis of the peripherality of the 10Be(d, p)11Be transfer reaction and extraction of the asymptotic normalization coefficient of 11Be bound states.Phys

    Yang, J.; Capel, P . Systematic analysis of the peripherality of the 10Be(d, p)11Be transfer reaction and extraction of the asymptotic normalization coefficient of 11Be bound states.Phys. Rev. C2018,98, 054602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.054602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.054602

  51. [51]

    Family of chiral two- plus three-nucleon interactions for accurate nuclear structure studies.Physics Letters B2020,808, 135651

    Hüther, T.; Vobig, K.; Hebeler, K.; Machleidt, R.; Roth, R. Family of chiral two- plus three-nucleon interactions for accurate nuclear structure studies.Physics Letters B2020,808, 135651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135651

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135651 2020

  52. [52]

    Break-out reactions from the CNO cycles.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics1999,25, R133

    Wiescher, M.; Görres, J.; Schatz, H. Break-out reactions from the CNO cycles.Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics1999,25, R133. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/25/6/201

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/6/201

  53. [53]

    Primordial Nucleosynthesis of Intermediate-Mass Elements in Baryon-Number–inhomogeneous Big Bang Models: Observational Tests.The Astrophysical Journal1990, 364, 7

    Kajino, T.; Mathews, G.J.; Fuller, G.M. Primordial Nucleosynthesis of Intermediate-Mass Elements in Baryon-Number–inhomogeneous Big Bang Models: Observational Tests.The Astrophysical Journal1990, 364, 7. https://doi.org/10.1086/169381

    work page doi:10.1086/169381

  54. [54]

    New Nuclear Reaction Flow during r-Process Nucleosynthesis in Supernovae: Critical Role of Light, Neutron-rich Nuclei.The Astrophysical Journal2001,562, 470

    Terasawa, M.; Sumiyoshi, K.; Kajino, T.; Mathews, G.J.; Tanihata, I. New Nuclear Reaction Flow during r-Process Nucleosynthesis in Supernovae: Critical Role of Light, Neutron-rich Nuclei.The Astrophysical Journal2001,562, 470. https://doi.org/10.1086/323526

    work page doi:10.1086/323526

  55. [55]

    15C: From halo effective field theory structure to the study of transfer, breakup, and radiative-capture reactions.Phys

    Moschini, L.; Yang, J.; Capel, P . 15C: From halo effective field theory structure to the study of transfer, breakup, and radiative-capture reactions.Phys. Rev. C2019,100, 044615. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.100.044615

    work page

  56. [56]

    Ab Initio Study of40Ca with an Importance-Truncated No-Core Shell Model.Phys

    Roth, R.; Navrátil, P . Ab Initio Study of40Ca with an Importance-Truncated No-Core Shell Model.Phys. Rev. Lett.2007,99, 092501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.092501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.092501 2007

  57. [57]

    Importance truncation for large-scale configuration interaction approaches.Phys

    Roth, R. Importance truncation for large-scale configuration interaction approaches.Phys. Rev. C2009, 79, 064324. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064324

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.064324

  58. [58]

    Extrapolation uncertainties in the importance-truncated no-core shell model.Phys

    Kruse, M.K.G.; Jurgenson, E.D.; Navrátil, P .; Barrett, B.R.; Ormand, W.E. Extrapolation uncertainties in the importance-truncated no-core shell model.Phys. Rev. C2013,87, 044301. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.87.044301

    work page

  59. [59]

    Asymptotic normalization coefficients from the14C(d,p) 15C reaction.Phys

    Mukhamedzhanov, A.M.; Burjan, V .; Gulino, M.; Hons, Z.; Kroha, V .; McCleskey, M.; Mrázek, J.; Nguyen, N.; Nunes, F.M.; Piskoˇ r, i.c.v.; et al. Asymptotic normalization coefficients from the14C(d,p) 15C reaction.Phys. Rev. C2011,84, 024616. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.024616

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.024616

  60. [60]

    The 14C(n, γ) cross section between 10 keV and 1 MeV .Phys

    Reifarth, R.; Heil, M.; Forssén, C.; Besserer, U.; Couture, A.; Dababneh, S.; Dörr, L.; Görres, J.; Haight, R.C.; Käppeler, F.; et al. The 14C(n, γ) cross section between 10 keV and 1 MeV .Phys. Rev. C2008,77, 015804. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.015804

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.77.015804

  61. [61]

    A Measurement of the14C(n, γ)15C Cross Section at a Stellar Temperature of kT = 23.3 keV.Astrophysical Journal1992,387, 258

    Beer, H.; Wiescher, M.; Kaeppeler, F.; Goerres, J.; Koehler, P .E. A Measurement of the14C(n, γ)15C Cross Section at a Stellar Temperature of kT = 23.3 keV.Astrophysical Journal1992,387, 258. https://doi.org/10.1 086/171077

    work page

  62. [62]

    Estimation of the effect of Tsallis non-extensive statistics on the 14C(n, γ)15C reaction rate.Frontiers in Physics2025,Volume 13 - 2025

    Tkachenko, A.S.; Burkova, N.A.; Yeleusheva, B.M.; Dubovichenko, S.B. Estimation of the effect of Tsallis non-extensive statistics on the 14C(n, γ)15C reaction rate.Frontiers in Physics2025,Volume 13 - 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2025.1688864

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2025.1688864 2025

  63. [63]

    New Determination of the 14C(n, γ)15C Reaction Rate and Its Astrophysical Implications.The Astrophysical Journal2025,989, 231

    Jiang, Y.; He, Z.; Luo, Y.; Xin, W.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Shen, Y.; Guo, B.; Li, G.; Pang, D.; et al. New Determination of the 14C(n, γ)15C Reaction Rate and Its Astrophysical Implications.The Astrophysical Journal2025,989, 231. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade5b3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade5b3

  64. [64]

    Ab initio informed evaluation of the radiative capture of protons on 7Be.Physics Letters B2023,845, 138156

    Kravvaris, K.; Navrátil, P .; Quaglioni, S.; Hebborn, C.; Hupin, G. Ab initio informed evaluation of the radiative capture of protons on 7Be.Physics Letters B2023,845, 138156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.physletb.2023.138156

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Muon capture on6Li, 12C, and 16O from ab initio nuclear theorys.Phys

    Jokiniemi, L.; Navrátil, P .; Kotila, J.; Kravvaris, K. Muon capture on6Li, 12C, and 16O from ab initio nuclear theorys.Phys. Rev. C2020,109, 065501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.065501. 25 of 26

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.065501

  66. [66]

    s-wave scattering lengths for the 7Be+p system from an R-matrix analysis

    Paneru, S.N.; Brune, C.R.; Giri, R.; Livesay, R.J.; Greife, U.; Blackmon, J.C.; Bardayan, D.W.; Chipps, K.A.; Davids, B.; Connolly, D.S.; et al. s-wave scattering lengths for the 7Be+p system from an R-matrix analysis. Phys. Rev. C2019,99, 045807. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.045807

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.045807

  67. [67]

    Excited state halos in 10Be.Phys

    Al-Khalili, J.; Arai, K. Excited state halos in 10Be.Phys. Rev. C2006,74, 034312. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.74.034312

    work page

  68. [68]

    Experimental study of the nature of the 1 − and 2− excited states in 10Be using the 11Be(p, d) reaction in inverse kinematics.Phys

    Kuhn, K.; Sarazin, F.; Nunes, F.M.; Alvarez, M.A.G.; Andreoiu, C.; Bardayan, D.W.; Bender, P .C.; Blackmon, J.C.; Borge, M.J.G.; Braid, R.; et al. Experimental study of the nature of the 1 − and 2− excited states in 10Be using the 11Be(p, d) reaction in inverse kinematics.Phys. Rev. C2021,104, 044601. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.104.044601

    work page

  69. [69]

    Probing the excited halo in 10Be using low-energy one neutron transfer reaction

    Chen, J.; Zhu, H.; Ayyad, Y.; Lou, J.; Browne, F.; Liu, W.; Xia, B.; Ge, H.; Obertelli, A.; Durant, V .; et al. Probing the excited halo in 10Be using low-energy one neutron transfer reaction. Technical report, 2023

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Energy Level Diagram, 10Be (2004)

    TUNL Nuclear Data Evaluation Project. Energy Level Diagram, 10Be (2004). https://nucldata.tunl.duke. edu/nucldata/figures/10figs/10_04_2004.pdf

    work page 2004

  71. [71]

    Low-energyα+6He elastic scattering with the resonating-group method.Phys

    Fujimura, K.; Baye, D.; Descouvemont, P .; Suzuki, Y.; Varga, K. Low-energyα+6He elastic scattering with the resonating-group method.Phys. Rev. C1999,59, 817–825. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.59.817

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.59.817

  72. [72]

    Clustering Structure of 10Be Studied with the Deformed RMF + BCS Method.Chinese Physics Letters2010,27, 022103

    Ming-Fei, Z.; Jia-Xing, L.; Deng-Gao, Z.; Rui, H.; Juan-Xia, J.; Li-Xiang, C. Clustering Structure of 10Be Studied with the Deformed RMF + BCS Method.Chinese Physics Letters2010,27, 022103. https://doi.org/10 .1088/0256-307X/27/2/022103

    work page

  73. [73]

    Descouvemont, P .; Itagaki, N. A stochastic microscopic approach to the 10Be and 11Be nuclei.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2020,2020, 023D02, [https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article- pdf/2020/2/023D02/33478481/ptz169.pdf]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptz169

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptz169 2020

  74. [74]

    Ab initio approaches to nuclear structure, scattering and tests of fundamental symmetries

    Gennari, M. Ab initio approaches to nuclear structure, scattering and tests of fundamental symmetries. PhD thesis, University of Victoria, 2021

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    Symmetry and Shape Coexistence in10Be.Bulgarian Journal of Physics2022,49, 57–66

    Caprio, M.A.; McCoy, A.E.; Fasano, P .J.; Dytrych, T. Symmetry and Shape Coexistence in10Be.Bulgarian Journal of Physics2022,49, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.55318/bgjp.2022.49.1.057

    work page doi:10.55318/bgjp.2022.49.1.057 2022

  76. [76]

    Quantum Monte Carlo calculations ofA= 9, 10 nuclei.Phys

    Pieper, S.C.; Varga, K.; Wiringa, R.B. Quantum Monte Carlo calculations ofA= 9, 10 nuclei.Phys. Rev. C 2002,66, 044310. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.66.044310

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.66.044310 2002

  77. [77]

    Microscopic three-cluster model of 10Be.Nuclear Physics A2017, 958, 78–100

    Lashko, Y.; Filippov, G.; Vasilevsky, V . Microscopic three-cluster model of 10Be.Nuclear Physics A2017, 958, 78–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.11.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.11.004 2016

  78. [78]

    Ab initio shell model forA= 10 nuclei.Phys

    Caurier, E.; Navrátil, P .; Ormand, W.E.; Vary, J.P . Ab initio shell model forA= 10 nuclei.Phys. Rev. C2002, 66, 024314. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.66.024314

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.66.024314

  79. [79]

    4He+n+n Continuum within an Ab initio Framework.Phys

    Romero-Redondo, C.; Quaglioni, S.; Navrátil, P .; Hupin, G. 4He+n+n Continuum within an Ab initio Framework.Phys. Rev. Lett.2014,113, 032503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.032503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.032503 2014

  80. [80]

    How Many-Body Correlations andα Clustering Shape 6He.Phys

    Romero-Redondo, C.; Quaglioni, S.; Navrátil, P .; Hupin, G. How Many-Body Correlations andα Clustering Shape 6He.Phys. Rev. Lett.2016,117, 222501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.222501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.222501 2016

Showing first 80 references.