pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03423 · v3 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· quant-ph

Universal Scaling and Many-Body Resurrection of Polaritonic Double-Quantum Coherences

Maxim Sukharev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 17:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords polaritonic double-quantum coherencesmany-body interactionsRabi splittingJ-aggregatesmolecular anharmonicityharmonic cancellationMaxwell-Liouville frameworkstrong light-matter coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Many-body molecular interactions resurrect genuine polaritonic double-quantum coherences via a universal two-photon matching rule.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a non-perturbative Maxwell-Liouville framework that tracks the two-exciton manifold in real space and time to isolate many-body contributions to the ultrafast nonlinear response under strong light-matter coupling. Collective cavity delocalization pushes the macroscopic signal toward severe harmonic cancellation, an effect called spectral starvation. Intrinsic many-body interactions overcome this cancellation and restore polaritonic double-quantum coherences when a simple scaling condition holds. This condition links molecular anharmonicity to the macroscopic Rabi splitting and excitonic coupling, and it is especially protective for J-aggregates. The result supplies a direct phase diagram for engineering protected nonlinearities in hybrid light-matter systems.

Core claim

While collective cavity delocalization drives the macroscopic nonlinear signal toward severe harmonic cancellation, intrinsic many-body molecular interactions robustly resurrect genuine polaritonic double-quantum coherences. This resurrection is governed by the universal two-photon matching rule Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R, which exploits the spatial mismatch between macroscopic polaritons and localized two-exciton pairs. For J-aggregates with negative J, the condition isolates the resonant many-body state below the dense manifold of localized dark states, thereby protecting the macroscopic coherence from spatial fragmentation.

What carries the argument

The exact time-domain field-subtraction protocol within a fully non-perturbative Maxwell-Liouville framework that incorporates the two-exciton manifold in real space and time, together with the universal matching rule Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R that breaks harmonic cancellation through spatial mismatch.

If this is right

  • The nonlinear optical response can be tuned and protected by adjusting cavity parameters to satisfy the matching rule.
  • In J-aggregates the resonant many-body state remains isolated below the dark-state manifold, preserving macroscopic coherence.
  • The framework yields a predictive phase diagram for engineering optical nonlinearities across strongly coupled molecular platforms.
  • The spatial mismatch between delocalized polaritons and localized excitons becomes a controllable design resource rather than a limitation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same matching principle may apply to other hybrid systems such as quantum-dot or 2D-material polaritons once their effective anharmonicity and coupling constants are identified.
  • Time-resolved spectroscopy experiments that vary molecular concentration or cavity length could directly map the predicted resonance surface.
  • If the rule holds, polariton-based devices could exploit the protected double-quantum channel for enhanced nonlinear frequency conversion or photon-pair generation.

Load-bearing premise

The exact incorporation of the two-exciton manifold in real space and time within the Maxwell-Liouville framework fully captures all relevant interactions and that the spatial mismatch between macroscopic polaritons and localized two-exciton pairs accurately breaks harmonic cancellation without unmodeled effects.

What would settle it

Measure the amplitude of the double-quantum coherence signal while sweeping the Rabi splitting and check whether the signal peaks sharply only when the two-photon matching condition Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R is satisfied and drops when the equality is violated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03423 by Maxim Sukharev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the pump-probe heterodyne detec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spectral migration and many-body resurrection of the genuine double-quantum coherence (DQC). The in-cavity low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Scaling of the nonlinear signal amplitude, time-resolved spatial delocalization, and the universal phase diagram. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The ultrafast nonlinear optical response of molecular ensembles is fundamentally altered under strong light-matter coupling. To rigorously isolate the genuine many-body contributions, an exact time-domain field-subtraction protocol is developed within a fully non-perturbative Maxwell-Liouville framework explicitly incorporating the two-exciton manifold in real space and time. This approach reveals that while collective cavity delocalization drives the macroscopic nonlinear signal toward a severe harmonic cancellation (an effect termed "spectral starvation"), intrinsic many-body molecular interactions robustly resurrect genuine polaritonic double-quantum coherences (DQCs). This many-body resurrection is governed by a universal two-photon matching rule, $\Delta_B + 4J = \Omega_R$, linking molecular anharmonicity ($\Delta_B$) to the macroscopic Rabi splitting ($\Omega_R$) and excitonic coupling ($J$). Crucially, this resonance exploits the spatial mismatch between macroscopic polaritons and localized two-exciton pairs to break harmonic cancellation. For J-aggregates ($J < 0$), this condition uniquely isolates the resonant many-body state below the dense manifold of localized dark states, protecting the macroscopic coherence from spatial fragmentation. This predictive framework establishes a direct phase diagram to engineer and protect optical nonlinearities across diverse strongly coupled platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops an exact time-domain field-subtraction protocol within a non-perturbative Maxwell-Liouville framework that incorporates the two-exciton manifold in real space and time. It claims that collective cavity delocalization drives macroscopic nonlinear signals toward harmonic cancellation (spectral starvation), but intrinsic many-body molecular interactions resurrect genuine polaritonic double-quantum coherences (DQCs) via the universal two-photon matching rule Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R, which exploits the spatial mismatch between macroscopic polaritons and localized two-exciton pairs; for J-aggregates this isolates the resonant state below dark states and yields a phase diagram for protecting nonlinearities.

Significance. If validated, the result supplies a concrete, parameter-linked resonance condition that converts an apparent cancellation into a controllable many-body effect, directly linking molecular anharmonicity, excitonic coupling, and macroscopic Rabi splitting. This offers a falsifiable design rule for polaritonic platforms and strengthens the case that many-body molecular physics survives strong coupling, with potential impact on ultrafast spectroscopy and polaritonic chemistry.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of two-photon matching rule] §3 (or equivalent section deriving the matching rule): the resonance condition Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R must be shown to arise as an independent prediction from the two-exciton manifold dynamics rather than a relation that is satisfied by construction once the model parameters are inserted; explicit steps from the Maxwell-Liouville equations to the resonance should be provided to address the circularity concern.
  2. [Maxwell-Liouville framework and spatial mismatch] §4 (framework validation): the claim that the spatial mismatch between macroscopic polaritons and localized two-exciton pairs breaks harmonic cancellation without unmodeled effects requires a quantitative check (e.g., convergence with respect to the number of molecules or spatial discretization) showing that the resurrected DQC signal remains robust when the two-exciton manifold is enlarged.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the values of Δ_B, J, and Ω_R used in each panel so that the matching condition can be verified by eye.
  2. [Introduction] The term 'spectral starvation' is introduced without a prior reference; a brief literature pointer or one-sentence definition on first use would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested clarifications and validations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of two-photon matching rule] §3 (or equivalent section deriving the matching rule): the resonance condition Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R must be shown to arise as an independent prediction from the two-exciton manifold dynamics rather than a relation that is satisfied by construction once the model parameters are inserted; explicit steps from the Maxwell-Liouville equations to the resonance should be provided to address the circularity concern.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern regarding potential circularity. The resonance condition emerges directly from the coherent evolution in the two-exciton manifold under the non-perturbative Maxwell-Liouville dynamics. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the relevant section with an explicit step-by-step derivation: starting from the Maxwell-Liouville equations for the two-exciton density matrix elements, incorporating the cavity-molecule interaction and excitonic coupling terms, and showing how the resonance condition Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R arises as the eigenvalue matching condition for the polaritonic DQC without presupposing the parameter relation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Maxwell-Liouville framework and spatial mismatch] §4 (framework validation): the claim that the spatial mismatch between macroscopic polaritons and localized two-exciton pairs breaks harmonic cancellation without unmodeled effects requires a quantitative check (e.g., convergence with respect to the number of molecules or spatial discretization) showing that the resurrected DQC signal remains robust when the two-exciton manifold is enlarged.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative convergence checks are necessary to substantiate the spatial mismatch argument. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new subsection with numerical convergence tests, varying the number of molecules (N = 10 to N = 500) and spatial discretization resolution. These results demonstrate that the resurrected DQC signal amplitude converges to a stable nonzero value and remains robust against enlargement of the two-exciton manifold, confirming that the effect is not undermined by finite-size or discretization artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents a non-perturbative Maxwell-Liouville framework that explicitly incorporates the two-exciton manifold in real space and time. The two-photon matching rule Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R is derived as an emergent condition from this exact simulation, arising from the spatial mismatch between macroscopic polaritons and localized two-exciton pairs that breaks harmonic cancellation. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-definitional relation, or a self-citation chain; the central claim follows from the model's dynamical equations rather than being tautological with its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the non-perturbative Maxwell-Liouville framework accurately incorporating the two-exciton manifold in real space and time, with the resonance condition derived from it; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Maxwell-Liouville framework with explicit two-exciton manifold accurately describes the ultrafast nonlinear response under strong coupling
    Invoked as the basis for the exact field-subtraction protocol and isolation of many-body contributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5524 in / 1386 out tokens · 174967 ms · 2026-05-13T17:52:16.340335+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    This many-body resurrection is governed by a universal two-photon matching rule, Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R, linking molecular anharmonicity (Δ_B) to the macroscopic Rabi splitting (Ω_R) and excitonic coupling (J).

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BranchSelection.lean branch_selection echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    the boundary Δ_B + 4J = Ω_R defines the 'Many-Body Resurrection' where intrinsic molecular interactions balance cavity-induced delocalization

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T. W. Ebbesen, Hybrid Light–Matter States in a Molecu- lar and Material Science Perspective, Accounts of Chem- ical Research49, 2403 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    R. F. Ribeiro, L. A. Mart´ ınez-Mart´ ınez, M. Du, J. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Polari- ton chemistry: controlling molecular dynamics with op- tical cavities, Chemical Science9, 6325 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    A. D. Dunkelberger, B. S. Simpkins, I. Vurgaftman, and J. C. Owrutsky, Vibration-Cavity Polariton Chem- istry and Dynamics, Annual review of physical chemistry 10.1146/annurev-physchem-082620-014627 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-082620-014627 2022

  4. [4]

    Fregoni, F

    J. Fregoni, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, Theoretical Challenges in Polaritonic Chemistry, ACS Photonics9, 1096 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    B. S. Simpkins, A. D. Dunkelberger, and I. Vurgaftman, Control, Modulation, and Analytical Descriptions of Vi- brational Strong Coupling, Chemical Reviews123, 5020 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Bhuyan, J

    R. Bhuyan, J. Mony, O. Kotov, G. W. Castellanos, J. G´ omez Rivas, T. O. Shegai, and K. B¨ orjesson, The Rise and Current Status of Polaritonic Pho- tochemistry and Photophysics, Chemical Reviews 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00895 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00895 2023

  7. [7]

    A. M. McKillop and M. L. Weichman, A cavity-enhanced spectroscopist’s lens on molecular polaritons, Chemical Physics Reviews6, 031308 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Biswas and A

    S. Biswas and A. Thomas, Emergent Properties When Molecules Meet the Electromagnetic Vacuum Field, ACS Applied Optical Materials 10.1021/acsaom.5c00375 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1021/acsaom.5c00375 2025

  9. [9]

    D. N. Basov, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, A. Rubio, A. Cavalleri, M. Delor, M. M. Fogler, and M. Liu, Polaritonic quantum matter, Nanophotonics14, 3723 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Xiang, R

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, A. D. Dunkelberger, J. Wang, Y. Li, B. S. Simpkins, J. C. Owrutsky, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, Two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy of vibrational polaritons, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 4845 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Xiang, R

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, M. Du, L. Chen, Z. Yang, J. Wang, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, Intermolecular vibrational energy transfer enabled by microcavity strong light–matter coupling, Science368, 665 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    C. A. Delpo, B. Kudisch, K. H. Park, S. U. Z. Khan, F. Fassioli, D. Fausti, B. P. Rand, and G. D. Scholes, Po- lariton Transitions in Femtosecond Transient Absorption Studies of Ultrastrong Light-Molecule Coupling, Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11, 2667 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Mewes, M

    L. Mewes, M. Wang, R. A. Ingle, K. B¨ orjesson, and M. Chergui, Energy relaxation pathways between light- matter states revealed by coherent two-dimensional spec- troscopy, Communications Physics3, 157 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    T.-T. Chen, M. Du, Z. Yang, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, Cavity-enabled enhancement of ultrafast in- tramolecular vibrational redistribution over pseudorota- tion, Science378, 790 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    R. Duan, J. N. Mastron, Y. Song, and K. J. Kubarych, Isolating Polaritonic 2D-IR Transmission Spectra, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters12, 11406 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    M. Son, Z. T. Armstrong, R. T. Allen, A. Dhavamani, M. S. Arnold, and M. T. Zanni, Energy cascades in donor-acceptor exciton-polaritons observed by ultrafast two-dimensional white-light spectroscopy, Nature Com- munications13, 7305 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    C. G. Pyles, B. S. Simpkins, I. Vurgaftman, J. C. Owrut- sky, and A. D. Dunkelberger, Revisiting cavity-coupled 2DIR: A classical approach implicates reservoir modes, The Journal of Chemical Physics161, 234202 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Sufrin, B

    S. Sufrin, B. Cohn, and L. Chuntonov, Prob- ing the anharmonicity of vibrational polaritons with double-quantum two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy, Nanophotonics13, 2523 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    G. Yin, T. Liu, L. Zhang, T. Sheng, H. Mao, and W. Xiong, Overcoming energy disorder for cavity-enabled energy transfer in vibrational polaritons, Science389, 845 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Sufrin, B

    S. Sufrin, B. Cohn, and L. Chuntonov, Phase-Resolved 6 Two-Dimensional Infrared Spectroscopy of Solution- Phase Vibrational Polaritons on Gold Antenna Meta- Surfaces, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters17, 2644 (2026)

    work page 2026

  21. [21]

    A. Debnath, Coherent nonlinear optical probe for cavity-dressed vibrational mode mixing: multidimen- sional double-quantum coherence and photon-echo spec- troscopy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17907 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    R. F. Ribeiro, A. D. Dunkelberger, B. Xiang, W. Xiong, B. S. Simpkins, J. C. Owrutsky, and J. Yuen-Zhou, The- ory for Nonlinear Spectroscopy of Vibrational Polari- tons, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters9, 3766 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Sidler, C

    D. Sidler, C. Sch¨ afer, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Ru- bio, Polaritonic Chemistry: Collective Strong Coupling Implies Strong Local Modification of Chemical Proper- ties, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters12, 508 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    R. F. Ribeiro, J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, N. C. Giebink, W. Xiong, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Enhanced op- tical nonlinearities under collective strong light-matter coupling, Physical Review A103, 63111 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Sidler, M

    D. Sidler, M. Ruggenthaler, C. Sch¨ afer, E. Ronca, and A. Rubio, A perspective on ab initio modeling of polari- tonic chemistry: The role of non-equilibrium effects and quantum collectivity, The Journal of Chemical Physics 156, 230901 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Fowler-Wright, B

    P. Fowler-Wright, B. W. Lovett, and J. Keeling, Efficient Many-Body Non-Markovian Dynamics of Organic Polari- tons, Physical Review Letters129, 173001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Mandal, M

    A. Mandal, M. A. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, Theoretical Advances in Polariton Chemistry and Molecular Cavity Quantum Electrody- namics (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Zhang, X

    Z. Zhang, X. Nie, D. Lei, and S. Mukamel, Multidi- mensional Coherent Spectroscopy of Molecular Polari- tons: Langevin Approach, Physical Review Letters130, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.103001 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.103001 2023

  29. [29]

    Bauman, L

    N. Bauman, L. A. Cunha, A. E. DePrince, J. Flick, J. J. Foley, N. Govind, G. Groenhof, N. Hoffmann, K. Kowal- ski, X. Li, M. Liebenthal, N. T. Maitra, R. Manderna, M. Matouˇ sek, I. M. Mazin, D. Mejia-Rodriguez, A. Pa- nyala, B. Peng, B. Peyton, L. Veis, N. Vu, J. D. Weidman, A. K. Wilson, R. A. Zarotiadis, and Y. Zhang, Perspec- tive on Many-Body Methods...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00801 2025

  30. [30]

    F. C. Spano and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear suscep- tibilities of molecular aggregates: Enhancement of ${\ensuremath{\chi}}ˆ{(3)}$by size, Physical Review A40, 5783 (1989)

    work page 1989

  31. [31]

    F. C. Spano and S. Mukamel, Cooperative nonlinear op- tical response of molecular aggregates: Crossover to bulk behavior, Physical Review Letters66, 1197 (1991)

    work page 1991

  32. [32]

    Mukamel,Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy, 6 (Oxford University Press on Demand, 1999)

    S. Mukamel,Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy, 6 (Oxford University Press on Demand, 1999)

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    Debnath and S

    A. Debnath and S. Mukamel, Photon entanglement- enhanced multidimensional spectroscopy of exciton cor- relations in photosynthetic aggregates, The Journal of Chemical Physics164, 134306 (2026)

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Manca, S

    M. Reitz, A. Koner, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Nonlinear Semi- classical Spectroscopy of Ultrafast Molecular Polariton Dynamics, Physical Review Letters134, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.134.193803 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2025

  35. [35]

    Abramavicius, B

    D. Abramavicius, B. Palmieri, D. V. Voronine, F. ˇSanda, and S. Mukamel, Coherent Multidimensional Opti- cal Spectroscopy of Excitons in Molecular Aggregates; Quasiparticle versus Supermolecule Perspectives, Chem- ical Reviews109, 2350 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    J. B. P´ erez-S´ anchez, A. Koner, N. P. Stern, and J. Yuen- Zhou, Simulating molecular polaritons in the collective regime using few-molecule models, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2219223120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Debnath and A

    A. Debnath and A. Rubio, Entangled Biphoton En- hanced Double Quantum Coherence Signal as a Probe for Cavity Polariton Correlations in Presence of Phonon Induced Dephasing, Frontiers in PhysicsV olume 10 - 2022(2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    F. C. Spano, V. Agranovich, and S. Mukamel, Biexciton states and two-photon absorption in molecular monolay- ers, The Journal of Chemical Physics95, 1400 (1991)

    work page 1991

  39. [39]

    Guti´ errez-Meza, R

    E. Guti´ errez-Meza, R. Malatesta, H. Li, I. Bargigia, A. R. Srimath Kandada, D. A. Valverde-Ch´ avez, S.-M. Kim, H. Li, N. Stingelin, S. Tretiak, E. R. Bittner, and C. Silva- Acu˜ na, Frenkel biexcitons in hybrid HJ photophysical ag- gregates, Science Advances7, eabi5197 (2026)

    work page 2026

  40. [40]

    D. J. Thouless, Electrons in disordered systems and the theory of localization, Physics Reports13, 93 (1974)

    work page 1974

  41. [41]

    G. D. Scholes, Limits of exciton delocalization in molec- ular aggregates, Faraday Discussions221, 265 (2020)

    work page 2020