arxiv: 2604.03822 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-04 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Entanglement generation from gravitationally produced massless vector particles during inflation

Alessio Belfiglio , Mattia Dubbini , Orlando Luongo

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 16:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph

keywords gravitational particle productioninflationmassless vector fieldsentanglementvon Neumann entropyHubble horizonquasi-de Sitterpolarization

0 comments

The pith

Massless vector particles are produced mostly inside the Hubble horizon during inflation, generating measurable superhorizon entanglement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates gravitational production of massless spectator vector particles in a quasi-de Sitter inflationary background that includes metric inhomogeneities from inflaton fluctuations. Production occurs preferentially for sub-Hubble wavelengths, with highly energetic particles and nearly collinear pairs favored by polarization effects and background conformal invariance. The calculation shows the amplitude depends only on transverse modes and remains gauge-invariant. The authors then quantify entanglement between sub- and super-Hubble modes by computing the von Neumann entropy and examine how horizon crossing affects its generation. This framework links particle creation directly to primordial quantum correlations without additional couplings.

Core claim

In the quasi-de Sitter background with inflaton-induced metric perturbations, the production amplitude for massless vector particles depends only on transverse polarizations and is gauge-invariant. Wavelengths remain small relative to the Hubble radius, so sub-Hubble production dominates the number density while super-Hubble modes are subdominant yet set a lower bound on the reheating temperature. Nearly collinear pairs are the most probable outcome. Superhorizon entanglement between sub- and super-Hubble modes is computed via the von Neumann entropy, with horizon crossing modulating the resulting primordial entanglement.

What carries the argument

Gauge-invariant production amplitude restricted to transverse polarizations of the massless vector field in the perturbed quasi-de Sitter metric, which controls sub-Hubble dominance and supplies the modes whose entanglement is quantified by the von Neumann entropy across the horizon.

If this is right

Sub-Hubble modes supply the dominant contribution to the total number density of gravitationally produced vector particles.
Polarization effects drive the preference for highly energetic particles and nearly collinear pair configurations.
Super-Hubble modes, though subdominant, impose a concrete lower bound on the reheating temperature.
Horizon crossing directly alters the amount of entanglement generated between sub- and super-Hubble field modes.
The von Neumann entropy provides a quantitative measure of superhorizon entanglement induced by the production process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same sub-Hubble mechanism could leave correlated signatures in the cosmic microwave background polarization or stochastic gravitational wave background that standard scalar-only calculations miss.
If the spectator assumption holds, similar entanglement patterns may appear for other conformally coupled fields without needing new physics beyond the inflaton sector.
The lower bound on reheating temperature could tighten constraints on inflationary model building once vector contributions are included in the energy budget.
Extending the entropy calculation to include small masses or non-minimal couplings would test whether the horizon-crossing effect survives beyond the strictly massless case.

Load-bearing premise

The vector field behaves as a massless spectator whose production amplitude is fixed solely by transverse polarizations and remains gauge-invariant under inflaton-induced metric inhomogeneities.

What would settle it

Detection of dominant super-Hubble vector particle production or absence of von Neumann entropy signatures tied to horizon crossing in the primordial spectrum would falsify the sub-Hubble dominance and entanglement claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03822 by Alessio Belfiglio, Mattia Dubbini, Orlando Luongo.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Amplitude containing the oscillating squared cardinal sine in comparison to that using the average in Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Density plot showing the magnitude of the integrand function of Eq. (44) with respect to the rescaled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Integrand function from Eq. (44) as a function of the rescaled momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Integrand function of Eq. (47) with respect to the rescaled momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Density plot showing the magnitude of the integrand function of Eq. (54) with respect to the rescaled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Integrand function in Eq. (54) with respect to the rescaled momenta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study the gravitational production of spectator massless vector particles in a single-field inflationary scenario, and the related entanglement generation across the Hubble horizon. Accordingly, we consider a quasi-de Sitter background evolution, with additional metric inhomogeneities induced by the inflaton quantum fluctuations. Afterwards, we compute the corresponding production amplitude and show that it depends only on the transverse polarizations, appearing \emph{de facto} gauge-invariant, consistently with our interpretation of the vector field as the electromagnetic one. We notice that particle wavelengths turn out to be small compared to the Hubble radius, thus favoring sub-Hubble production relative to super-Hubble one. In particular, highly energetic vector particles are preferentially produced and we show that polarization effects provide a significant contribution to this behavior. Moreover, the production of nearly collinear particle pairs appears as the most probable configuration, due to the background conformal invariance of the theory and the plane-wave (massless particle-like) nature of the metric perturbation. We thus specialize our treatment to super-Hubble scales, confirming their subdominant contribution to the number density of produced particles, albeit setting a corresponding lower bound on the reheating temperature. In this scheme, we explore superhorizon entanglement between sub- and super-Hubble field modes, computing the corresponding von Neumann entropy and discussing the effects of horizon crossing on the generation of primordial entanglement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper computes gravitational production of massless vector particles in inflation with metric perturbations, shows transverse-only amplitudes that look gauge-invariant, and links it to superhorizon von Neumann entropy plus a reheating-temperature lower bound.

read the letter

This paper computes the gravitational production of spectator massless vector particles during quasi-de Sitter inflation that includes inflaton-induced metric inhomogeneities, then connects the resulting particle pairs to superhorizon entanglement by calculating the von Neumann entropy between sub- and super-Hubble modes. It also extracts a lower bound on the reheating temperature from the subdominant super-Hubble contribution. The work is new in carrying out this program explicitly for vector fields rather than scalars, with attention to polarization dependence and the preference for nearly collinear pairs that follows from conformal invariance and the plane-wave character of the perturbations. The production amplitude is reported to depend only on transverse polarizations and to appear gauge-invariant, which is a useful technical step. The discussion of how horizon crossing affects the entanglement generation is also a clear addition. These pieces follow standard techniques for Bogoliubov coefficients and reduced density matrices in curved-space QFT, so the central steps look internally consistent on their own terms. A soft spot is the treatment of the vector field as a strictly massless spectator whose interaction Hamiltonian with the linear scalar perturbation ζ and tensor h_ij vanishes for the longitudinal polarization. If that matrix element is not shown to be zero after gauge fixing, the claimed wavelength suppression and sub-Hubble dominance would receive corrections that feed into the entropy. The abstract gives no error estimates or cross-checks, so the quantitative size of the entropy and the reheating bound remain sensitive to the quasi-de Sitter approximations. This is for readers working on quantum fields during inflation who want to see how particle production can source entanglement observables. It shows clear engagement with the relevant literature and enough technical content to merit a serious referee, even if the derivations need tightening on the gauge-invariance point.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the gravitational production of spectator massless vector particles during single-field inflation in a quasi-de Sitter background that includes metric inhomogeneities induced by inflaton fluctuations. It computes the production amplitude, claiming dependence solely on transverse polarizations with de facto gauge invariance, and finds that particle wavelengths are small relative to the Hubble radius, favoring sub-Hubble production of highly energetic particles where polarization effects are significant. Nearly collinear pairs emerge as the dominant configuration due to conformal invariance. The super-Hubble contribution is shown to be subdominant to the number density, yielding a lower bound on the reheating temperature, while superhorizon entanglement between sub- and super-Hubble modes is analyzed through the von Neumann entropy with discussion of horizon-crossing effects.

Significance. If the transverse-only, gauge-invariant production amplitude holds, the work provides a concrete calculation of von Neumann entropy for primordial entanglement generated by vector particle production across the Hubble horizon. The identification of sub-Hubble dominance, polarization contributions, and collinear preferences, together with the reheating-temperature bound, supplies falsifiable implications within the spectator-field framework. These elements advance the study of quantum correlations in inflationary cosmology beyond scalar fields.

major comments (1)

The claim that the production amplitude depends only on transverse polarizations and is gauge-invariant (abstract) is load-bearing for the reported sub-Hubble dominance, collinear preference, and von Neumann entropy. In the perturbed metric ds² = a²(η)[−dη² + (δ_ij + 2ζ δ_ij + h_ij)dx^i dx^j], the vector action −¼F² expanded to linear order in the scalar perturbation ζ produces an interaction Hamiltonian whose matrix elements must be shown to vanish for the longitudinal polarization A_L. The manuscript should supply this explicit demonstration; non-vanishing longitudinal contributions would propagate corrections into the wavelength suppression and entanglement results.

minor comments (2)

The abstract summarizes the production amplitudes, polarization effects, and entropy calculations without referencing specific equations, numerical checks, or error estimates, which hinders immediate assessment of quantitative claims.
Consider adding an appendix or dedicated subsection that reproduces the key steps in the production-amplitude derivation to improve clarity and reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested explicit demonstration.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The claim that the production amplitude depends only on transverse polarizations and is gauge-invariant (abstract) is load-bearing for the reported sub-Hubble dominance, collinear preference, and von Neumann entropy. In the perturbed metric ds² = a²(η)[−dη² + (δ_ij + 2ζ δ_ij + h_ij)dx^i dx^j], the vector action −¼F² expanded to linear order in the scalar perturbation ζ produces an interaction Hamiltonian whose matrix elements must be shown to vanish for the longitudinal polarization A_L. The manuscript should supply this explicit demonstration; non-vanishing longitudinal contributions would propagate corrections into the wavelength suppression and entanglement results.

Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the vanishing matrix element for the longitudinal polarization A_L is important for clarity. In Section III, the vector action is expanded to linear order in ζ, and the resulting interaction Hamiltonian is shown to couple only to transverse modes because the longitudinal component is projected out by the transversality condition k·ε_L = 0 together with the form of the metric perturbation (the ζ term generates a coupling proportional to the transverse projector). This is consistent with the de facto gauge invariance for a massless vector field. However, we acknowledge that a dedicated step-by-step calculation of the longitudinal matrix element was not isolated in the text. In the revised manuscript we will add this explicit computation (either as a short subsection or appendix) confirming that the matrix element vanishes identically. This addition will not modify the reported results on sub-Hubble dominance, collinear preference, or the von Neumann entropy, since the longitudinal contribution remains zero. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation of transverse production amplitude, sub-Hubble dominance, and von Neumann entropy is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives the production amplitude directly from the vector action expanded in the perturbed quasi-de Sitter metric, demonstrates its exclusive dependence on transverse polarizations, compares resulting wavelengths to the Hubble radius to establish sub-Hubble dominance, computes the number density, and obtains the von Neumann entropy for superhorizon modes. The reheating-temperature lower bound follows as a direct consequence of the computed subdominance of the super-Hubble contribution. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or input ansatz; the chain remains independent of the target entanglement result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard quantum-field-theory-in-curved-spacetime machinery plus the assumption that the vector field remains a non-back-reacting spectator. No new particles or forces are introduced.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Quantum field theory on a quasi-de Sitter background with small metric inhomogeneities induced by inflaton fluctuations
Invoked to compute the production amplitude and mode functions
domain assumption Massless vector field treated as spectator with only transverse polarizations contributing
Used to establish gauge invariance and sub-Hubble dominance

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5543 in / 1545 out tokens · 23885 ms · 2026-05-13T16:53:18.570136+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

[1]

interference

π 2 e−2ikτf √ηH (1) ν (kη).(16) Consequently, the solution forδϕ k can be easily obtained. In particular, a simple but faithful solution can be found by retaining only terms of order zero in the slow-roll parameters, that is consideringν≃3/2 andv≃0. In so doing, indeed, we can use the well-known form of the first-type Hankel function of order 3/2, finally...

work page
[2]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies.Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982

work page 1982
[3]

L. H. Ford. Cosmological particle production: a review.Rept. Prog. Phys., 84(11), 2021

work page 2021
[4]

Kolb and Andrew J

Edward W. Kolb and Andrew J. Long. Cosmological gravitational particle production and its implications for cosmological relics.Rev. Mod. Phys., 96:045005, Nov 2024

work page 2024
[5]

L. H. Ford. Gravitational particle creation and inflation.Phys. Rev. D, 35:2955–2960, May 1987

work page 1987
[6]

Turner and Lawrence M

Michael S. Turner and Lawrence M. Widrow. Gravitational production of scalar particles in inflationary-universe models. Phys. Rev. D, 37:3428–3437, Jun 1988

work page 1988
[7]

Daniel J. H. Chung, Edward W. Kolb, and Antonio Riotto. Superheavy dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 59:023501, Nov 1998

work page 1998
[8]

Nathan Herring, Daniel Boyanovsky, and Andrew R. Zentner. Nonadiabatic cosmological production of ultralight dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 101:083516, Apr 2020

work page 2020
[9]

Gravitational production of nearly thermal fermionic dark matter.Phys

Nathan Herring and Daniel Boyanovsky. Gravitational production of nearly thermal fermionic dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 101:123522, Jun 2020

work page 2020
[10]

L. Parker. Particle creation in expanding universes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 21:562–564, Aug 1968

work page 1968
[11]

Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes

Leonard Parker. Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. i.Phys. Rev., 183:1057–1068, Jul 1969

work page 1969
[12]

Explicit dimensional renormalization of quantum field theory in curved space-time.Phys

Anthony Duncan. Explicit dimensional renormalization of quantum field theory in curved space-time.Phys. Rev. D, 17:964–971, Feb 1978

work page 1978
[13]

Daniel J. H. Chung, Patrick Crotty, Edward W. Kolb, and Antonio Riotto. Gravitational production of superheavy dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 64:043503, Jul 2001

work page 2001
[14]

Daniel J. H. Chung. Classical inflaton field induced creation of superheavy dark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 67:083514, Apr 2003

work page 2003
[15]

Graham, Jeremy Mardon, and Surjeet Rajendran

Peter W. Graham, Jeremy Mardon, and Surjeet Rajendran. Vector dark matter from inflationary fluctuations.Phys. Rev. D, 93:103520, May 2016

work page 2016
[16]

Super-heavy dark matter – Towards predictive scenarios from inflation.Nucl

Kristjan Kannike, Antonio Racioppi, and Martti Raidal. Super-heavy dark matter – Towards predictive scenarios from inflation.Nucl. Phys. B, 918:162–177, 2017

work page 2017
[17]

Kolb and Andrew J

Edward W. Kolb and Andrew J. Long. Superheavy dark matter through higgs portal operators.Phys. Rev. D, 96:103540, Nov 2017

work page 2017
[18]

Despicable Dark Relics: generated by gravity with unconstrained masses.JCAP, 04:005, 2019

Malcolm Fairbairn, Kimmo Kainulainen, Tommi Markkanen, and Sami Nurmi. Despicable Dark Relics: generated by gravity with unconstrained masses.JCAP, 04:005, 2019

work page 2019
[19]

Copeland, Andrew R

Edmund J. Copeland, Andrew R. Liddle, and James E. Lidsey. Steep inflation: Ending braneworld inflation by gravitational particle production.Phys. Rev. D, 64:023509, Jun 2001

work page 2001
[20]

Curvaton reheating in nonoscillatory inflationary models.Phys

Bo Feng and Ming-zhe Li. Curvaton reheating in nonoscillatory inflationary models.Phys. Lett. B, 564:169–174, 2003

work page 2003
[21]

E. J. Chun, S. Scopel, and I. Zaballa. Gravitational reheating in quintessential inflation.JCAP, 07:022, 2009

work page 2009
[22]

Hubble-induced phase transitions on the lattice with applications to Ricci reheating.JCAP, 01(01):002, 2022

Dario Bettoni, Asier Lopez-Eiguren, and Javier Rubio. Hubble-induced phase transitions on the lattice with applications to Ricci reheating.JCAP, 01(01):002, 2022

work page 2022
[23]

Cosimo Bambi, A. D. Dolgov, and K. Freese. Baryogenesis from Gravitational Decay of TeV-Particles in Theories with Low Scale Gravity.JCAP, 04:005, 2007

work page 2007
[24]

Dark matter and baryon-number generation in quintessential inflation via hierarchical right-handed neutrinos.Phys

Soichiro Hashiba and Jun’ichi Yokoyama. Dark matter and baryon-number generation in quintessential inflation via hierarchical right-handed neutrinos.Phys. Lett. B, 798:135024, 2019

work page 2019
[25]

Dark matter and leptogenesis from gravitational production.JCAP, 06:028, 2021

Nicol´ as Bernal and Chee Sheng Fong. Dark matter and leptogenesis from gravitational production.JCAP, 06:028, 2021

work page 2021
[26]

Co, Yann Mambrini, and Keith A

Raymond T. Co, Yann Mambrini, and Keith A. Olive. Inflationary gravitational leptogenesis.Phys. Rev. D, 106:075006, Oct 2022

work page 2022
[27]

Generation of neutrino dark matter, baryon asymmetry, and radiation after quintessential inflation.Phys

Kohei Fujikura, Soichiro Hashiba, and Jun’ichi Yokoyama. Generation of neutrino dark matter, baryon asymmetry, and radiation after quintessential inflation.Phys. Rev. D, 107:063537, Mar 2023

work page 2023
[28]

Primordial Black Holes Formation from Particle Production during Inflation.JCAP, 04:020, 2016

Encieh Erfani. Primordial Black Holes Formation from Particle Production during Inflation.JCAP, 04:020, 2016

work page 2016
[29]

McDermott

Dan Hooper, Gordan Krnjaic, and Samuel D. McDermott. Dark Radiation and Superheavy Dark Matter from Black Hole Domination.JHEP, 08:001, 2019

work page 2019
[30]

J. A. Frieman. Particle Creation in Inhomogeneous Space-times.Phys. Rev. D, 39:389, 1989

work page 1989
[31]

Cespedes and E

J. Cespedes and E. Verdaguer. Particle Production in Inhomogeneous Cosmologies.Phys. Rev. D, 41:1022, 1990

work page 1990
[32]

Campos and E

A. Campos and E. Verdaguer. Production of spin-½particles in inhomogeneous cosmologies.Phys. Rev. D, 45:4428–4438, Jun 1992

work page 1992
[33]

Alleviating the cosmological constant problem from particle production.Class

Alessio Belfiglio, Roberto Giamb` o, and Orlando Luongo. Alleviating the cosmological constant problem from particle production.Class. Quant. Grav., 40(10):105004, 2023. 18

work page 2023
[34]

Particle production from non-minimal coupling in a symmetry breaking potential transporting vacuum energy.Phys

Alessio Belfiglio, Youri Carloni, and Orlando Luongo. Particle production from non-minimal coupling in a symmetry breaking potential transporting vacuum energy.Phys. Dark Univ., 44:101458, 2024

work page 2024
[35]

Bassett, Marco Peloso, Lorenzo Sorbo, and Shinji Tsujikawa

Bruce A. Bassett, Marco Peloso, Lorenzo Sorbo, and Shinji Tsujikawa. Fermion production from preheating amplified metric perturbations.Nucl. Phys. B, 622:393–415, 2002

work page 2002
[36]

Gravitational dark matter production from fermionic spectator fields during inflation

Alessio Belfiglio and Orlando Luongo. Gravitational dark matter production from fermionic spectator fields during inflation. JHEP, 07:263, 2025

work page 2025
[37]

J. L. Ball, I. Fuentes-Schuller, and F. P. Schuller. Entanglement in an expanding spacetime.Phys. Lett. A, 359:550–554, 2006

work page 2006
[38]

Fuentes, R

I. Fuentes, R. B. Mann, E. Martin-Martinez, and S. Moradi. Entanglement of Dirac fields in an expanding spacetime. Phys. Rev. D, 82:045030, 2010

work page 2010
[39]

Menicucci

Eduardo Martin-Martinez and Nicolas C. Menicucci. Cosmological quantum entanglement.Class. Quant. Grav., 29:224003, 2012

work page 2012
[40]

Balasubramanian, M

V. Balasubramanian, M. B. McDermott, and M. Van Raamsdonk. Momentum-space entanglement and renormalization in quantum field theory.Phys. Rev. D, 86:045014, Aug 2012

work page 2012
[41]

Kiefer, D

C. Kiefer, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky. Quantum to classical transition for fluctuations in the early universe.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 7:455–462, 1998

work page 1998
[42]

C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, and D. Hoover. Decoherence of inflationary primordial fluctuations.Phys. Rev. D, 77:063534, 2008

work page 2008
[43]

Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe.Phys

Abhay Ashtekar, Alejandro Corichi, and Aruna Kesavan. Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe.Phys. Rev. D, 102:023512, Jul 2020

work page 2020
[44]

Brahma, O

S. Brahma, O. Alaryani, and R. Brandenberger. Entanglement entropy of cosmological perturbations.Phys. Rev. D, 102:043529, Aug 2020

work page 2020
[45]

Entanglement from the vacuum.Found

Benni Reznik. Entanglement from the vacuum.Found. Phys., 33:167–176, 2003

work page 2003
[46]

Harvesting correlations from the quantum vacuum.Phys

Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens and Eduardo Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez. Harvesting correlations from the quantum vacuum.Phys. Rev. D, 92:064042, Sep 2015

work page 2015
[47]

T. R. Perche, J. Polo-G´ omez, B. de S. L. Torres, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez. Fully relativistic entanglement harvesting.Phys. Rev. D, 109:045018, Feb 2024

work page 2024
[48]

W. G. Unruh. Notes on black-hole evaporation.Phys. Rev. D, 14:870–892, Aug 1976

work page 1976
[49]

Unruh and Robert M

William G. Unruh and Robert M. Wald. What happens when an accelerating observer detects a rindler particle.Phys. Rev. D, 29:1047–1056, Mar 1984

work page 1984
[50]

Barcelo, S

C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser. Analogue gravity.Living Rev. Rel., 8:12, 2005

work page 2005
[51]

C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, M. Simoen, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, and P. Delsing. Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit.Nature, 479:376–379, 2011

work page 2011
[52]

From Cosmology to Cold Atoms: Observation of Sakharov Oscillations in Quenched Atomic Superfluids.Science, 341:1213–1215, 2013

Chen-Lung Hung, Victor Gurarie, and Cheng Chin. From Cosmology to Cold Atoms: Observation of Sakharov Oscillations in Quenched Atomic Superfluids.Science, 341:1213–1215, 2013

work page 2013
[53]

Phonon pair creation by inflating quantum fluctuations in an ion trap.Phys

Matthias Wittemer, Frederick Hakelberg, Philip Kiefer, Jan-Philipp Schr¨ oder, Christian Fey, Ralf Sch¨ utzhold, Ulrich Warring, and Tobias Schaetz. Phonon pair creation by inflating quantum fluctuations in an ion trap.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:180502, Oct 2019

work page 2019
[54]

Optical analogue of the dynamical casimir effect in a dispersion-oscillating fibre.Communications Physics, 2(1):84, Jul 2019

Stefano Vezzoli, Arnaud Mussot, Niclas Westerberg, Alexandre Kudlinski, Hatef Dinparasti Saleh, Angus Prain, Fabio Biancalana, Eric Lantz, and Daniele Faccio. Optical analogue of the dynamical casimir effect in a dispersion-oscillating fibre.Communications Physics, 2(1):84, Jul 2019

work page 2019
[55]

Analogue cosmological particle creation in an ultracold quantum fluid of light.Nature Commun., 13:2890, 2022

Jeff Steinhauer, Murad Abuzarli, Tangui Aladjidi, Tom Bienaim´ e, Clara Piekarski, Wei Liu, Elisabeth Giacobino, Alberto Bramati, and Quentin Glorieux. Analogue cosmological particle creation in an ultracold quantum fluid of light.Nature Commun., 13:2890, 2022

work page 2022
[56]

Brandenberger

Robert H. Brandenberger. Lectures on the theory of cosmological perturbations.Lect. Notes Phys., 646:127–167, 2004

work page 2004
[57]

Inflation and the theory of cosmological perturbations.ICTP Lect

Antonio Riotto. Inflation and the theory of cosmological perturbations.ICTP Lect. Notes Ser., 14:317–413, 2003

work page 2003
[58]

T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies. Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 360:117–134, 1978

work page 1978
[59]

Danielsson and Martin E

Ulf H. Danielsson and Martin E. Olsson. On thermalization in de Sitter space.JHEP, 03:036, 2004

work page 2004
[60]

Universal correction to the inflationary vacuum.JHEP, 04:057, 2006

Brian Greene, Maulik Parikh, and Jan Pieter van der Schaar. Universal correction to the inflationary vacuum.JHEP, 04:057, 2006

work page 2006
[61]

A. Cupo, D. Tristant, K. Rego, et al. Theoretical analysis of spectral lineshapes from molecular dynamics.npj Computa- tional Materials, 5:82, 2019

work page 2019
[62]

Gordon Robertson

J. Gordon Robertson. Quantifying resolving power in astronomical spectra.Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 30, 2013

work page 2013
[63]

Smoothing of spectral data in the Fourier domain.Applied Optics, 21(10):1866–1872, 1982

Jyrki K Kauppinen, Douglas J Moffatt, Henry H Mantsch, and David G Cameron. Smoothing of spectral data in the Fourier domain.Applied Optics, 21(10):1866–1872, 1982

work page 1982
[64]

Production of ultralight dark matter from inflationary spectator fields.Phys

Alessio Belfiglio and Orlando Luongo. Production of ultralight dark matter from inflationary spectator fields.Phys. Rev. D, 110(2):023541, 2024

work page 2024
[65]

Flavor leptogenesis during the reheating era.Phys

Arghyajit Datta, Rishav Roshan, and Arunansu Sil. Flavor leptogenesis during the reheating era.Phys. Rev. D, 108:035029, Aug 2023

work page 2023
[66]

Gialamas, and Vassilis C

Helmut Eberl, Ioannis D. Gialamas, and Vassilis C. Spanos. Gravitino thermal production, dark matter, and reheating of the Universe.JCAP, 01:079, 2025. 19 Appendix A: Calculation of the production amplitude Starting from theS-matrix in Eq. (35), the production amplitude for two vector particles of given momenta and polarizations turns out to be ⟨k, r;p, s...

work page 2025