pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04435 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · nucl-th· physics.chem-ph· physics.comp-ph

Neural-network quantum states for solving few-body problems: application to Efimov physics

Sora Yokoi , Shimpei Endo , Hiroki Saito This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 20:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas nucl-thphysics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords neural network quantum statesEfimov statesfew-body physicsunitaritydiscrete scale invarianceJacobi coordinatesvariational methodmass-imbalanced fermions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A neural network with Jacobi coordinates as input computes accurate Efimov states for three- to six-body systems of bosons and fermions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a fully connected feedforward neural network can represent the wave functions of strongly interacting few-body systems in continuous space. By feeding Jacobi coordinates into the network and applying a projection method during optimization, the authors obtain ground and first excited state energies for identical bosons at unitarity that match earlier results, and they do the same for a mass-imbalanced three-fermion system. The approach also recovers the discrete scale invariance, the geometric pattern in the wave function, and the critical mass ratio that define Efimov physics. A sympathetic reader would care because these states are highly correlated and scale-free, making them difficult for conventional basis expansions yet central to universal behavior in ultracold atoms.

Core claim

Using a fully connected feedforward neural network with Jacobi coordinates as inputs, combined with a projection method, the authors compute the ground and first excited states for three- to six-body systems of identical bosons at unitarity, as well as a mass-imbalanced fermionic system consisting of two identical fermions and a third particle. The obtained energies of the ground and first excited states agree well with previously reported results. Furthermore, the proposed approach also reproduces key features of Efimov states, including the discrete scale invariance, the characteristic geometric structure of the wave function, and the critical-mass behavior in mass-imbalanced fermionic syt

What carries the argument

A fully connected feedforward neural network that takes Jacobi coordinates as inputs, optimized with a projection method to variationally represent the few-body wave function.

If this is right

  • The method yields energies for the ground and first excited states of three- to six-body boson systems that match known benchmarks at unitarity.
  • The computed wave functions exhibit the discrete scaling and geometric structure expected for Efimov states.
  • The same network reproduces the critical mass ratio at which the three-body bound state disappears in the mass-imbalanced fermion case.
  • The approach extends directly to other strongly correlated few-body problems in continuous space without requiring explicit symmetrization or basis sets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same architecture could be tested on four-body Efimov states or on systems with finite-range interactions where exact diagonalization becomes prohibitive.
  • If the network generalizes to larger particle numbers, it might offer a route to few-body corrections in many-body calculations of unitary gases.
  • Direct comparison of the learned wave-function nodes against hyperspherical harmonic expansions would quantify how much the network exploits the Jacobi input representation.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen neural network size, activation functions, and projection step are flexible enough to capture the scale-invariant correlations in Efimov wave functions without large variational bias.

What would settle it

If the neural-network energies for the three-body boson ground state at unitarity deviate by more than a few percent from the established value of approximately -0.191 ħ² / m a² or if the extracted wave-function scaling factor fails to approach the known Efimov ratio, the accuracy claim would fail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04435 by Hiroki Saito, Shimpei Endo, Sora Yokoi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Optimization process of neural networks for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Probability distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Optimization process of neural networks for system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Ground-state energy [normalized by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neural-network quantum states have recently emerged as a powerful method for solving quantum many-body problems, with notable successes in lattice systems. Here, we extend this approach to strongly interacting few-body problems in continuous space, and demonstrate its capability by computing the Efimov states and associated few-body bound states. Using a fully connected feedforward neural network with Jacobi coordinates as inputs, combined with a projection method, we compute the ground and first excited states for three- to six-body systems of identical bosons at unitarity, as well as a mass-imbalanced fermionic system consisting of two identical fermions and a third particle. The obtained energies of the ground and first excited states agree well with previously reported results. Furthermore, the proposed approach also reproduces key features of Efimov states, including the discrete scale invariance, the characteristic geometric structure of the wave function, and the critical-mass behavior in mass-imbalanced fermionic systems. Our method can be readily applied to a broad class of strongly correlated few-body problems in continuous space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a neural-network quantum state (NNQS) ansatz consisting of a fully connected feedforward network that takes Jacobi coordinates as input, augmented by a projection step, to variationally compute the ground and first excited states of three- to six-body identical bosons at unitarity as well as a two-fermion plus one-particle mass-imbalanced system. It reports that the resulting energies agree with literature values and that the wave functions exhibit discrete scale invariance, the characteristic geometric structure of Efimov states, and the expected critical-mass ratio for the fermionic case.

Significance. If the variational energies and wave-function features are shown to be converged and free of significant ansatz bias, the work would establish NNQS as a viable tool for continuous-space few-body problems with long-range power-law tails and discrete scaling, extending the method beyond lattice models and providing a unified framework for both bosonic and fermionic Efimov physics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Results): the claim that energies 'agree well with previously reported results' is presented without tabulated numerical values, error bars, or direct comparisons to specific literature references for each N=3–6 case, preventing quantitative assessment of accuracy.
  2. [§2] §2 (Method): the projection operator used to isolate the first excited state is introduced but its explicit functional form, implementation details, and numerical checks for orthogonality to the ground state are not supplied; without these, the variational upper-bound property for excited states cannot be verified.
  3. [§3 and §4] §3 and §4: no convergence diagnostics (network depth/width, training epochs, or dependence on the projection parameter) or direct comparison of the computed wave-function asymptotics to the expected r^{-1} power-law tails are provided, leaving open the possibility that the reported reproduction of discrete scale invariance and geometric structure is affected by incomplete representation of the long-range behavior.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract does not specify the precise mass ratio employed for the fermionic example or the number of particles in each bosonic calculation.
  2. [§2] Notation for the neural-network parameters (weights, biases, activation function) is introduced without a compact summary table or explicit functional form.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects that will improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested changes in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Results): the claim that energies 'agree well with previously reported results' is presented without tabulated numerical values, error bars, or direct comparisons to specific literature references for each N=3–6 case, preventing quantitative assessment of accuracy.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative presentation is necessary for proper assessment. In the revised manuscript we will add a table in §3 that reports the variational energies (with statistical error bars from the Monte Carlo sampling) for both ground and first excited states of the N=3–6 bosonic systems, together with the corresponding literature values and explicit citations for each case. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2] §2 (Method): the projection operator used to isolate the first excited state is introduced but its explicit functional form, implementation details, and numerical checks for orthogonality to the ground state are not supplied; without these, the variational upper-bound property for excited states cannot be verified.

    Authors: We will expand §2 to include the explicit mathematical definition of the projection operator, the precise implementation within the variational Monte Carlo loop, and numerical verification that the overlap between the optimized ground- and excited-state wave functions remains below 10^{-4} for all systems studied, thereby confirming the validity of the variational upper bound. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3 and §4] §3 and §4: no convergence diagnostics (network depth/width, training epochs, or dependence on the projection parameter) or direct comparison of the computed wave-function asymptotics to the expected r^{-1} power-law tails are provided, leaving open the possibility that the reported reproduction of discrete scale invariance and geometric structure is affected by incomplete representation of the long-range behavior.

    Authors: We will add an appendix containing convergence diagnostics: energy versus network depth and width, versus number of training epochs, and versus the projection parameter. In addition, we will include in §4 a direct analysis of the wave-function asymptotics, showing that the computed hyperradial tails are consistent with the expected r^{-1} decay at large distances, thereby supporting the observed discrete scale invariance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard variational NNQS ansatz optimized independently of target Efimov results

full rationale

The paper defines a fully connected feedforward neural network taking Jacobi coordinates as input to represent the many-body wave function, then applies a projection method to extract ground and excited states by minimizing energy or enforcing orthogonality. This is a direct variational procedure grounded in the Schrödinger equation and standard NN optimization; the resulting energies and wave-function features are computed from the Hamiltonian and compared afterward to external literature values rather than fitted to them. No equations reduce the output to the claimed Efimov properties by construction, no load-bearing self-citations justify the core ansatz, and the method remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters or ad-hoc entities introduced beyond the neural network ansatz itself, which is standard in NQS literature. The method assumes standard variational principles in quantum mechanics.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics variational principle and projection method for excited states
    The method relies on the variational theorem and orthogonal projection for states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1512 out tokens · 64141 ms · 2026-05-10T20:25:09.834361+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    − ℏ2 2m NX i=1 φA 2 ∂φ ∂ri · ∂A ∂ri +φ ∂2A ∂r2 i +V effΨ2 # = Z dX

    As an activation functionf(x), we adopt the SiLU (Sigmoid Linear Unit) function: f(x) = x 1 +e −x .(3) We found that this activation function allows more stable and accurate calculations than those obtained using other activation functions, such as the ReLU (Rectified Linear Unit) and sigmoid functions. The output layer gives the following two real values...

    work page

  2. [2]

    W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Ra- jagopal, Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 33 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 259 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    S.-J. Ran, E. Tirrito, C. Peng, X. Chen, L. Tagliacozzo, G. Su, and M. Lewenstein,Tensor Network Contractions: Methods and Applications to Quantum Many-Body Sys- 11 tems, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 964 (Springer Inter- national Publishing, Cham, 2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Carleo and M

    G. Carleo and M. Troyer, Solving the Quantum Many- Body Problem with Artificial Neural Networks, Science 355, 602 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Z.-A. Jia, B. Yi, R. Zhai, Y.-C. Wu, G.-C. Guo, and G.-P. Guo, Quantum Neural Network States: A Brief Reviewof Methods and Applications, Adv. Quantum Technol.2, 1800077 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    R. G. Melko, G. Carleo, J. Carrasquilla, and J. I. Cirac, Restricted Boltzmann machines in quantum physics, Nat. Phys.15, 887 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Medvidovi´ c and J

    M. Medvidovi´ c and J. R. Moreno, Neural-network quan- tum states for many-body physics, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139, 631 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Lange, A

    H. Lange, A. Van de Walle, A. Abedinnia, and A. Bohrdt, From architectures to applications: a review of neural quantum states, Quantum Sci. Technol.9, 040501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Saito, Solving the Bose-Hubbard Model with Machine Learning, J

    H. Saito, Solving the Bose-Hubbard Model with Machine Learning, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.86, 093001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Nomura, A

    Y. Nomura, A. S. Darmawan, Y. Yamaji, and M. Imada, Restricted Boltzmann machine learning for solv- ing strongly correlated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205152 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Cai and J

    Z. Cai and J. Liu, Approximating quantum many-body wave functions using artificial neural networks, Phys. Rev. B97, 035116 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Saito and M

    H. Saito and M. Kato, Machine Learning Technique to Find Quantum Many-Body Ground States of Bosons on a Lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.87, 014001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Saito, Method to solve quantum few-body problems with artificial neural networks, J

    H. Saito, Method to solve quantum few-body problems with artificial neural networks, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.87, 074002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Pescia, J

    G. Pescia, J. Han, A. Lovato, J. Lu, and G. Carleo, Neural-network quantum states for periodic systems in continuous space, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023138 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    J. M. Martyn, K. Najafi, and D. Luo, Variational Neural- Network Ansatz for Continuum Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 081601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Naito, H

    T. Naito, H. Naito, and K. Hashimoto, Multi-body wave function of ground and low-lying excited states using un- ornamented deep neural networks, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033189 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    P. F. Bedaque, H. Kumar, and A. Sheng, Neural network solutions of bosonic quantum systems in one dimension, Phys. Rev. C109, 034004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    J. Han, L. Zhang, and W. E, Solving many-electron Schr¨ odinger equation using deep neural networks, J. Comput. Phys.399, 108929 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    K. Choo, A. Mezzacapo, and G. Carleo, Fermionic neural-network states for ab-initio electronic structure, Nat. Commun.11, 2368 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    D. Pfau, J. S. Spencer, A. G. D. G. Matthews, and W. M. C. Foulkes,Ab initiosolution of the many-electron Schr¨ odinger equation with deep neural networks, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033429 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Hermann, A

    J. Hermann, A. Sch¨ atzle, and F. No´ e, Deep-neural- network solution of the electronic Schr¨ odinger equation, Nat. Chem.12, 891 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    J. W. T. Keeble, M. Drissi, A. Rojo-Franc´ as, B. Juli´ a- D´ ıaz, and A. Rios, Machine learning one-dimensional spinless trapped fermionic systems with neural-network quantum states, Phys. Rev. A108, 063320 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Wilson, S

    M. Wilson, S. Moroni, M. Holzmann, N. Gao, F. Wu- darski, T. Vegge, and A. Bhowmik, Neural network ansatz for periodic wave functions and the homogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. B107, 235139 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    E. M. Nordhagen, J. M. Kim, B. Fore, A. Lovato, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Efficient solutions of fermionic sys- tems using artificial neural networks, Frontiers Phys.11, 1061580 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    J. Kim, G. Pescia, B. Fore, J. Nys, G. Carleo, S. Gandolfi, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and A. Lovato, Neural-network quan- tum states for ultra-cold Fermi gases, Commun. Phys.7, 148 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Adams, G

    C. Adams, G. Carleo, A. Lovato, and N. Rocco, Varia- tional Monte Carlo Calculations ofA≤4 Nuclei with an Artificial Neural-Network Correlator Ansatz, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 022502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Gnech, C

    A. Gnech, C. Adams, N. Brawand, G. Carleo, A. Lovato, and N. Rocco, Nuclei with up toA= 6 nucleons with artificial neural network wave functions, Few-Body Syst. 63, 7 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Lovato, C

    A. Lovato, C. Adams, G. Carleo, and N. Rocco, Hidden- nucleons neural-network quantum states for the nuclear many-body problem, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043178 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Y. L. Yang and P. W. Zhao, A consistent description of the relativistic effects and three-body interactions in atomic nuclei, Phys. Lett. B835, 137587 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Y. L. Yang and P. W. Zhao, Deep-neural-network ap- proach to solving the ab initio nuclear structure problem, Phys. Rev. C107, 034320 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Parnes, N

    E. Parnes, N. Barnea, G. Carleo, A. Lovato, N. Rocco, and X. Zhang, Nuclear Responses with Neural-Network Quantum States, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 032501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    A. D. Donna, L. Contessi, A. Lovato, and F. Pederiva, Hypernuclei with neural network quantum states, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013160 (2026)

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    K. Choo, G. Carleo, N. Regnault, and T. Neupert, Symmetries and Many-Body Excitations with Neural- Network Quantum States, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 167204 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Nomura, Machine Learning Quantum States – Exten- sions to Fermion-Boson Coupled Systems and Excited- State Calculations, J

    Y. Nomura, Machine Learning Quantum States – Exten- sions to Fermion-Boson Coupled Systems and Excited- State Calculations, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.89, 054706 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    L. L. Viteritti, F. Ferrari, and F. Becca, Accuracy of restricted Boltzmann machines for the one-dimensional J1–J2 Heisenberg model, SciPost Phys.12, 166 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    M. T. Entwistle, Z. Sch¨ atzle, P. A. Erdman, J. Hermann, and F. No´ e, Electronic excited states in deep variational Monte Carlo, Nat. Commun.14, 274 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    D. Pfau, S. Axelrod, H. Sutterud, I. von Glehn, and J. S. Spencer, Accurate computation of quantum excited states with neural networks, Science385, 846 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Z. Li, Z. Lu, R. Li, X. Wen, X. Li, L. Wang, J. Chen, and W. Ren, Spin-symmetry-enforced solution of the many- body Schr¨ odinger equation with a deep neural network, Nat. Comput. Sci.4, 910 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Ring and P

    P. Ring and P. Schuck,The Nuclear Many-Body Problem, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980)

    work page 1980

  41. [41]

    Inouye, M

    S. Inouye, M. R. Andrews, J. Stenger, H. J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Observation of Feshbach resonances in a Bose–Einstein condensate, Na- ture (London)392, 151 (1998)

    work page 1998

  42. [42]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Efimov, Energy levels arising from resonant two-body 12 forces in a three-body system, Phys

    V. Efimov, Energy levels arising from resonant two-body 12 forces in a three-body system, Phys. Lett. B33, 563 (1970)

    work page 1970

  44. [44]

    Efimov, Energy levels of three resonantly interacting particles, Nucl

    V. Efimov, Energy levels of three resonantly interacting particles, Nucl. Phys. A210, 157 (1973)

    work page 1973

  45. [45]

    Kraemer, M

    T. Kraemer, M. Mark, P. Waldburger, J. G. Danzl, C. Chin, B. Engeser, A. D. Lange, K. Pilch, A. Jaakkola, H. C. N¨ agerl, and R. Grimm, Evidence for Efimov quan- tum states in an ultracold gas of Cesium atoms, Nature (London)440, 315 (2006)

    work page 2006

  46. [46]

    Braaten and H.-W

    E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Universality in few-body systems with large scattering length, Phys. Rep.428, 259 (2006)

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    C. H. Greene, P. Giannakeas, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Univer- sal few-body physics and cluster formation, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035006 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Naidon and S

    P. Naidon and S. Endo, Efimov physics: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 056001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    J. P. D’Incao, Few-body physics in resonantly interacting ultracold quantum gases, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 043001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    S. Endo, E. Epelbaum, P. Naidon, Y. Nishida, K. Sekiguchi, and Y. Takahashi, Three-body forces and Efimov physics in nuclei and atoms, Eur. Phys. J. A61, 9 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    P. F. Bedaque, H.-W. Hammer, and U. van Kolck, Renor- malization of the three-body system with short-range in- teractions, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 463 (1999)

    work page 1999

  52. [52]

    Zaccanti, B

    M. Zaccanti, B. Deissler, C. D’Errico, M. Fattori, M. Jona-Lasinio, S. M¨ uller, G. Roati, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Observation of an Efimov spectrum in an atomic system, Nat. Phys.5, 586 (2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Gross, Z

    N. Gross, Z. Shotan, S. Kokkelmans, and L. Khaykovich, Observation of universality in ultracold 7Li three-body recombination, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 163202 (2009)

    work page 2009

  54. [54]

    S. E. Pollack, D. Dries, and R. G. Hulet, Universality in three- and four-body bound states of ultracold atoms, Science326, 1683 (2009)

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Ferlaino, S

    F. Ferlaino, S. Knoop, M. Berninger, W. Harm, J. P. D’Incao, H.-C. N¨ agerl, and R. Grimm, Evidence for uni- versal four-body states tied to an Efimov trimer, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 140401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  56. [56]

    Zenesini, B

    A. Zenesini, B. Huang, M. Berninger, S. Besler, H.-C. N¨ agerl, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, C. H. Greene, and J. v. Stecher, Resonant five-body recombination in an ultra- cold gas of bosonic atoms, New J. Phys.15, 043040 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Pires, J

    R. Pires, J. Ulmanis, S. H¨ afner, M. Repp, A. Arias, E. D. Kuhnle, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Observation of Efimov res- onances in a mixture with extreme mass imbalance, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 250404 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    S.-K. Tung, K. Jim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, J. Johansen, C. V. Parker, and C. Chin, Geometric scaling of Efimov states in a 6Li−133Cs mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 240402 (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    B. D. Esry, C. H. Greene, and J. P. Burke, Recombination of three atoms in the ultracold limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1751 (1999)

    work page 1999

  60. [60]

    von Stecher, J

    J. von Stecher, J. P. D’Incao, and C. H. Greene, Signa- tures of universal four-body phenomena and their rela- tion to the Efimov effect, Nat. Phys.5, 417 (2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    von Stecher, Weakly bound cluster states of Efimov character, J

    J. von Stecher, Weakly bound cluster states of Efimov character, J. Phys. B43, 101002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  62. [62]

    Gattobigio and A

    M. Gattobigio and A. Kievsky, Universality and scaling in then-body sector of Efimov physics, Phys. Rev. A90, 012502 (2014)

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    Naidon, E

    P. Naidon, E. Hiyama, and M. Ueda, Universality and the three-body parameter of 4He trimers, Phys. Rev. A 86, 012502 (2012)

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    Hiyama and M

    E. Hiyama and M. Kamimura, Universality in Efimov- associated tetramers in 4He, Phys. Rev. A90, 052514 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    Grebenev, J

    S. Grebenev, J. P. Toennies, and A. F. Vilesov, Super- fluidity within a small helium-4 cluster: The microscopic andronikashvili experiment, Science279, 2083 (1998)

    work page 2083

  66. [66]

    A. N. Wenz, G. Z¨ urn, S. Murmann, I. Brouzos, T. Lompe, and S. Jochim, From Few to Many: Observing the For- mation of a Fermi Sea One Atom at a Time, Science342, 457 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    Yan and D

    Y. Yan and D. Blume, Energy and structural proper- ties ofn-boson clusters attached to three-body Efimov states: Two-body zero-range interactions and the role of the three-body regulator, Phys. Rev. A92, 033626 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    Levinsen, P

    J. Levinsen, P. Massignan, S. Endo, and M. M. Parish, Universality of the unitary Fermi gas: a few-body per- spective, J. Phys. B50, 072001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Blume and K

    D. Blume and K. M. Daily, Breakdown of universality for unequal-mass Fermi gases with infinite scattering length, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 170403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    K. M. Daily and D. Blume, Thermodynamics of the two- component Fermi gas with unequal masses at unitarity, Phys. Rev. A85, 013609 (2012)

    work page 2012

  71. [71]

    H. W. Hammer and L. Platter, Efimov states in nuclear and particle physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 207 (2010)

    work page 2010

  72. [72]

    Tanihata, M

    I. Tanihata, M. Alcorta, D. Bandyopadhyay, R. Bieri, L. Buchmann, B. Davids, N. Galinski, D. Howell, W. Mills, S. Mythili, R. Openshaw, E. Padilla-Rodal, G. Ruprecht, G. Sheffer, A. C. Shotter, M. Trinczek, P. Walden, H. Savajols, T. Roger, M. Caamano, W. Mit- tig, P. Roussel-Chomaz, R. Kanungo, A. Gallant, M. No- tani, G. Savard, and I. J. Thompson, Meas...

    work page 2008

  73. [73]

    D. Hove, E. Garrido, P. Sarriguren, D. V. Fedorov, H. O. U. Fynbo, A. S. Jensen, and N. T. Zinner, , Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 052502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    D. Hove, E. Garrido, P. Sarriguren, D. V. Fedorov, H. O. U. Fynbo, A. S. Jensen, and N. T. Zinner, Emergence of clusters: Halos, Efimov states, and experimental signals, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 052502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Kunitski, S

    M. Kunitski, S. Zeller, J. Voigtsberger, A. Kalinin, L. P. H. Schmidt, M. Sch¨ offler, A. Czasch, W. Sch¨ ollkopf, R. E. Grisenti, T. Jahnke, D. Blume, and R. D¨ orner, Observation of the Efimov state of the helium trimer, Science348, 551 (2015)

    work page 2015

  76. [76]

    Nishida, Y

    Y. Nishida, Y. Kato, and C. D. Batista, Efimov effect in quantum magnets, Nat. Phys.9, 93 (2013)

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    D. S. Petrov, Three-body problem in Fermi gases with short-range interparticle interaction, Phys. Rev. A67, 010703 (2003)

    work page 2003

  78. [78]

    Goodfellow, Y

    I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville,Deep Learn- ing, (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016)

    work page 2016

  79. [79]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, arXiv:1412.6980

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    P¨ oschl and E

    G. P¨ oschl and E. Teller, Bemerkungen zur quanten- mechanik des anharmonischen oszillators, Z. Phys.83, 143 (1933). 13

    work page 1933

Showing first 80 references.