pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04563 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Temporal Inversion for Learning Interval Change in Chest X-Rays

Hanbin Ko , Kyungmin Jeon , Doowoong Choi , Chang Min Park
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords temporal inversionchest x-rayinterval changeprogression classificationvision-language modelsmedical imagingtemporal embedding
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reversing the order of prior and current chest X-ray pairs supplies a supervisory signal that teaches models to detect directional interval change.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces TILA, a framework that adds temporal inversion—flipping the sequence of two radiographs taken at different times—as an extra training objective. Conventional models process each image in isolation or without explicit direction, so they struggle to distinguish progression from regression. TILA injects inversion-aware losses during pretraining, fine-tuning, and inference to make the model explicitly learn temporal order. The authors also release a unified protocol and a new retrieval benchmark, MS-CXR-T, for measuring order sensitivity. Experiments across public datasets and hospital cohorts show that the same base architectures perform better at progression classification and temporal embedding alignment once TILA is added.

Core claim

TILA uses temporal inversion, the reversal of image pairs, as a supervisory signal to enhance the sensitivity of existing temporal vision-language models to directional change, integrating inversion-aware objectives across pretraining, fine-tuning, and inference to complement conventional appearance modeling with explicit learning of temporal order.

What carries the argument

Temporal inversion of paired radiographs, applied as an auxiliary objective to enforce sensitivity to forward versus backward time direction.

If this is right

  • Existing temporal vision-language architectures gain improved progression classification accuracy without architectural changes.
  • Temporal embedding spaces become more consistent under order reversal.
  • The same inversion objectives transfer across multiple base models and both public and real-world hospital data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The inversion signal could be tested on other longitudinal imaging modalities such as follow-up CT or MRI to check whether the benefit is CXR-specific.
  • The unified evaluation protocol could be applied to non-medical time-series data where order matters, such as video action recognition.

Load-bearing premise

Reversing the temporal order of image pairs supplies a clean, unbiased supervisory signal for directional change without introducing artifacts from the reversal process or mismatched clinical contexts.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment in which models trained with TILA show no measurable gain over baselines on order-sensitivity or progression-classification benchmarks would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04563 by Chang Min Park, Doowoong Choi, Hanbin Ko, Kyungmin Jeon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: TILA Framework: Temporal Inversion-aware Learning and Alignment. The framework comprises three stages: pretraining, fine-tuning, and inference. (a–b) Pretraining: paired CXRs are encoded in both original and reversed orders; the Change-aware Sigmoid Loss aligns unchanged cases and separates changed ones. (c) Fine-tuning: the Bidirectional Cross-Entropy (BiCE) enforces label inversion, while the Temporal Co… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Score Distribution Analysis for Pleural Effusion (MS-CXR-T). Distribution of prediction scores (scaled by 10) for each pleural effusion progression label, comparing baseline and TILA models in the zero-shot setting. Each boxplot separates cases by progression label (improved, stable, worsened) and label quality (consensus vs. disagreement), shown for both standard and inversion-aware (combined) scoring. Ke… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Example workflow for constructing MS-CXR-T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent advances in vision--language pretraining have enabled strong medical foundation models, yet most analyze radiographs in isolation, overlooking the key clinical task of comparing prior and current images to assess interval change. For chest radiographs (CXRs), capturing interval change is essential, as radiologists must evaluate not only the static appearance of findings but also how they evolve over time. We introduce TILA (Temporal Inversion-aware Learning and Alignment), a simple yet effective framework that uses temporal inversion, reversing image pairs, as a supervisory signal to enhance the sensitivity of existing temporal vision-language models to directional change. TILA integrates inversion-aware objectives across pretraining, fine-tuning, and inference, complementing conventional appearance modeling with explicit learning of temporal order. We also propose a unified evaluation protocol to assess order sensitivity and consistency under temporal inversion, and introduce MS-CXR-Tretrieval, a retrieval evaluation set constructed through a general protocol that can be applied to any temporal CXR dataset. Experiments on public datasets and real-world hospital cohorts demonstrate that TILA consistently improves progression classification and temporal embedding alignment when applied to multiple existing architectures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes TILA (Temporal Inversion-aware Learning and Alignment), a framework that augments existing temporal vision-language models for chest X-ray analysis by incorporating temporal inversion—reversing prior/current image pairs—as an explicit supervisory signal for directional change. The method adds inversion-aware objectives across pretraining, fine-tuning, and inference stages, complements standard appearance modeling, and introduces a unified evaluation protocol for order sensitivity plus the MS-CXR-Tretrieval retrieval benchmark. Experiments on public datasets and real-world hospital cohorts are reported to show consistent gains in progression classification and temporal embedding alignment when TILA is applied to multiple base architectures.

Significance. If the central improvements prove robust and the inversion signal is shown to isolate true pathology evolution, the work would address a clinically important gap in longitudinal CXR interpretation beyond static image analysis. The introduction of a generalizable retrieval evaluation protocol and the MS-CXR-Tretrieval dataset constitute reusable contributions that could aid future benchmarking. The approach is architecture-agnostic and integrates cleanly with existing vision-language pipelines, which strengthens its potential utility if the empirical gains hold under controlled conditions.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that temporal inversion supplies a clean, unbiased supervisory signal for directional change is load-bearing for all reported gains. The manuscript must explicitly describe pair selection criteria, any alignment or normalization steps applied to reversed pairs, and controls that isolate pathology evolution from confounds such as differences in positioning, exposure, acquisition parameters, or intervening clinical events. Without such details or ablations demonstrating that the model does not exploit reversal-induced artifacts, the improvements in progression classification and embedding alignment cannot be confidently attributed to learning of interval change. This concern is especially salient given the non-stationary nature of CXR acquisition noted in the skeptic analysis.
  2. The abstract states that TILA 'consistently improves' progression classification and temporal embedding alignment, yet provides no quantitative metrics, effect sizes, ablation results, or statistical tests. The experiments section must report concrete numbers (e.g., accuracy deltas, AUC improvements, alignment scores) with baselines, confidence intervals, and significance tests for each architecture and dataset; otherwise the claim of consistent improvement across public and hospital cohorts remains unverifiable.
minor comments (2)
  1. The unified evaluation protocol for order sensitivity and consistency under temporal inversion should be formalized with explicit equations or pseudocode for the metrics used, including how consistency is quantified when pairs are inverted.
  2. Ensure that the construction protocol for MS-CXR-Tretrieval is fully specified (e.g., inclusion criteria, temporal window definitions, negative sampling strategy) so that the dataset can be reproduced on other temporal CXR collections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have carefully reviewed the major concerns and provide point-by-point responses below, along with our plans for revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that temporal inversion supplies a clean, unbiased supervisory signal for directional change is load-bearing for all reported gains. The manuscript must explicitly describe pair selection criteria, any alignment or normalization steps applied to reversed pairs, and controls that isolate pathology evolution from confounds such as differences in positioning, exposure, acquisition parameters, or intervening clinical events. Without such details or ablations demonstrating that the model does not exploit reversal-induced artifacts, the improvements in progression classification and embedding alignment cannot be confidently attributed to learning of interval change. This concern is especially salient given the non-stationary nature of CXR acquisition noted in the skeptic analysis.

    Authors: We agree that greater transparency on these aspects is essential to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in the Methods describing: (i) explicit pair selection criteria (time-interval thresholds, exclusion of pairs with missing metadata, and balancing across public and hospital cohorts); (ii) all preprocessing and normalization steps applied to both original and reversed pairs, including intensity rescaling, spatial registration where performed, and handling of acquisition-parameter metadata; and (iii) new ablation and control experiments that isolate pathology evolution from confounds (e.g., performance on pairs with documented intervening clinical events versus stable cases, and controlled synthetic perturbations of positioning/exposure). These additions will allow readers to evaluate whether gains arise from directional change learning rather than reversal-induced artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The abstract states that TILA 'consistently improves' progression classification and temporal embedding alignment, yet provides no quantitative metrics, effect sizes, ablation results, or statistical tests. The experiments section must report concrete numbers (e.g., accuracy deltas, AUC improvements, alignment scores) with baselines, confidence intervals, and significance tests for each architecture and dataset; otherwise the claim of consistent improvement across public and hospital cohorts remains unverifiable.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract, as a high-level summary, does not contain the requested quantitative detail. The full experiments section already reports per-architecture and per-dataset metrics with baseline comparisons; however, to address the concern directly we will (a) revise the abstract to include representative quantitative improvements (AUC deltas, alignment-score changes) with references to the corresponding tables, and (b) ensure every result table and figure caption in the experiments section explicitly lists confidence intervals and statistical significance tests (paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with p-values) for all public and hospital cohorts. These changes will make the “consistent improvement” claim verifiable without altering the underlying findings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework adds objectives without reducing claims to self-defined fits

full rationale

The paper presents TILA as a framework that augments existing vision-language models with temporal inversion objectives for learning directional change in CXR pairs. No equations, derivations, or parameter-fitting steps are described in the abstract or provided text that would make any claimed improvement (e.g., progression classification gains) equivalent to quantities defined by construction from the same data or self-citations. The method relies on adding new supervisory signals and a unified evaluation protocol, with experimental validation on public and hospital datasets treated as independent evidence. This is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only view; the method rests on the assumption that existing vision-language pretraining already captures appearance features and that temporal order can be learned as an additive signal. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are explicitly quantified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1163 out tokens · 37442 ms · 2026-05-10T19:19:38.343355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CheXTemporal: A Dataset for Temporally-Grounded Reasoning in Chest Radiography

    cs.CV 2026-05 accept novelty 8.0

    CheXTemporal supplies paired chest X-rays with explicit temporal progression taxonomy and spatial grounding to benchmark and improve models on longitudinal reasoning tasks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Learning to exploit temporal structure for biomed- ical vision-language processing

    Shruthi Bannur, Stephanie Hyland, Qianchu Liu, Fernando Perez-Garcia, Maximilian Ilse, Daniel C Castro, Benedikt Boecking, Harshita Sharma, Kenza Bouzid, Anja Thieme, et al. Learning to exploit temporal structure for biomed- ical vision-language processing. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15016–15...

    2023

  2. [2]

    Making the most of text semantics to improve biomedical vision–language processing

    Benedikt Boecking, Naoto Usuyama, Shruthi Bannur, Daniel C Castro, Anton Schwaighofer, Stephanie Hyland, Maria Wetscherek, Tristan Naumann, Aditya Nori, Javier Alvarez-Valle, et al. Making the most of text semantics to improve biomedical vision–language processing. InEuro- pean conference on computer vision, pages 1–21. Springer,

  3. [3]

    arXiv:2405.19538 (2024)

    Pierre Chambon, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Thomas Sounack, Shih-Cheng Huang, Zhihong Chen, Maya Varma, Steven QH Truong, Chu The Chuong, and Curtis P Langlotz. Chexpert plus: Hundreds of thousands of aligned radiology texts, im- ages and patients.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19538, 2024. 4, 5

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.10936 (2022)

    Yifan Du, Zikang Liu, Junyi Li, and Wayne Xin Zhao. A survey of vision-language pre-trained models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.10936, 2022. 1

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Recap: Towards precise radiology report generation via dynamic disease progression reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13864, 2023

    Wenjun Hou, Yi Cheng, Kaishuai Xu, Wenjie Li, and Jiang Liu. Recap: Towards precise radiology report generation via dynamic disease progression reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13864, 2023. 1

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Hist-aid: Leveraging histori- cal patient reports for enhanced multi-modal automatic diag- nosis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10684, 2024

    Haoxu Huang, Cem M Deniz, Kyunghyun Cho, Sumit Chopra, and Divyam Madaan. Hist-aid: Leveraging histori- cal patient reports for enhanced multi-modal automatic diag- nosis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10684, 2024. 1

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Gloria: A multimodal global-local represen- tation learning framework for label-efficient medical image recognition

    Shih-Cheng Huang, Liyue Shen, Matthew P Lungren, and Serena Yeung. Gloria: A multimodal global-local represen- tation learning framework for label-efficient medical image recognition. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3942–3951, 2021. 1

    2021

  8. [8]

    Mimic-iii, a freely accessible critical care database

    Alistair EW Johnson, Tom J Pollard, Lu Shen, Li-wei H Lehman, Mengling Feng, Mohammad Ghassemi, Benjamin Moody, Peter Szolovits, Leo Anthony Celi, and Roger G Mark. Mimic-iii, a freely accessible critical care database. Scientific data, 3(1):1–9, 2016. 4

    2016

  9. [9]

    Variability matters: Evaluating inter-rater variability in histopathology for robust cell detection

    Cholmin Kang, Chunggi Lee, Heon Song, Minuk Ma, and S´ergio Pereira. Variability matters: Evaluating inter-rater variability in histopathology for robust cell detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 552–565. Springer, 2022. 8

    2022

  10. [10]

    Chexrelnet: An anatomy-aware model for tracking longitudinal relationships between chest x-rays

    Gaurang Karwande, Amarachi B Mbakwe, Joy T Wu, Leo A Celi, Mehdi Moradi, and Ismini Lourentzou. Chexrelnet: An anatomy-aware model for tracking longitudinal relationships between chest x-rays. InInternational Conference on Med- ical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pages 581–591. Springer, 2022. 1

    2022

  11. [11]

    Bringing clip to the clinic: Dynamic soft labels and negation-aware learning for medical analysis

    Hanbin Ko and Chang-Min Park. Bringing clip to the clinic: Dynamic soft labels and negation-aware learning for medical analysis. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 25897–25906, 2025. 5

    2025

  12. [12]

    Exploring the capabilities of llm encoders for image-text retrieval in chest x-rays.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15234, 2025

    Hanbin Ko, Gihun Cho, Inhyeok Baek, Donguk Kim, Joon- beom Koo, Changi Kim, Dongheon Lee, and Chang Min Park. Exploring the capabilities of llm encoders for image-text retrieval in chest x-rays.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15234, 2025. 1

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Efficient medical vision-language align- ment through adapting masked vision models.IEEE Trans- actions on Medical Imaging, 2025

    Chenyu Lian, Hong-Yu Zhou, Dongyun Liang, Jing Qin, and Liansheng Wang. Efficient medical vision-language align- ment through adapting masked vision models.IEEE Trans- actions on Medical Imaging, 2025. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6

    2025

  14. [14]

    Enhanced contrastive learning with multi-view longitudinal data for chest x-ray re- port generation

    Kang Liu, Zhuoqi Ma, Xiaolu Kang, Yunan Li, Kun Xie, Zhicheng Jiao, and Qiguang Miao. Enhanced contrastive learning with multi-view longitudinal data for chest x-ray re- port generation. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 10348–10359, 2025. 6

    2025

  15. [15]

    Hierarchical vision transformers for dis- ease progression detection in chest x-ray images

    Amarachi B Mbakwe, Lyuyang Wang, Mehdi Moradi, and Ismini Lourentzou. Hierarchical vision transformers for dis- ease progression detection in chest x-ray images. InIn- ternational Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pages 685–695. Springer,

  16. [16]

    Rethinking generalization: The impact of annotation style on medical image segmentation

    Brennan Nichyporuk, Jillian Cardinell, Justin Szeto, Raghav Mehta, Jean-Pierre R Falet, Douglas L Arnold, Sotirios A Tsaftaris, and Tal Arbel. Rethinking generalization: The impact of annotation style on medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17398, 2022. 8

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021. 1

    2021

  18. [18]

    Automated annotator variability inspection for biomedical image segmentation.IEEE access, 10:2753–2765, 2022

    Marcel P Schilling, Tim Scherr, Friedrich R M ¨unke, Oliver Neumann, Mark Schutera, Ralf Mikut, and Markus Reischl. Automated annotator variability inspection for biomedical image segmentation.IEEE access, 10:2753–2765, 2022. 8

    2022

  19. [19]

    Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean- Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023. 5

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Multi-granularity cross-modal align- ment for generalized medical visual representation learn- ing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:33536–33549, 2022

    Fuying Wang, Yuyin Zhou, Shujun Wang, Varut Vardhanab- huti, and Lequan Yu. Multi-granularity cross-modal align- ment for generalized medical visual representation learn- ing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:33536–33549, 2022. 1

    2022

  21. [21]

    Medclip: Contrastive learning from unpaired medi- cal images and text

    Zifeng Wang, Zhenbang Wu, Dinesh Agarwal, and Jimeng Sun. Medclip: Contrastive learning from unpaired medi- cal images and text. InProceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, page 3876, 2022. 1

    2022

  22. [22]

    Wu, Nkechinyere N

    Joy T Wu, Nkechinyere N Agu, Ismini Lourentzou, Arjun Sharma, Joseph A Paguio, Jasper S Yao, Edward C Dee, William Mitchell, Satyananda Kashyap, Andrea Giovannini, et al. Chest imagenome dataset for clinical reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.00316, 2021. 5

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Unlocking the power of spatial and temporal infor- mation in medical multimodal pre-training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19654, 2024

    Jinxia Yang, Bing Su, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. Unlocking the power of spatial and temporal infor- mation in medical multimodal pre-training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19654, 2024. 1

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Tempa-vlp: Temporal-aware vision-language pretraining for longitudinal exploration in chest x-ray image

    Zhuoyi Yang and Liyue Shen. Tempa-vlp: Temporal-aware vision-language pretraining for longitudinal exploration in chest x-ray image. In2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pages 4625–

  25. [25]

    Deep learning for automated triaging of stable chest radiographs in a follow-up setting.Radiology, 309(1):e230606, 2023

    Jihye Yun, Yura Ahn, Kyungjin Cho, Sang Young Oh, Sang Min Lee, Namkug Kim, and Joon Beom Seo. Deep learning for automated triaging of stable chest radiographs in a follow-up setting.Radiology, 309(1):e230606, 2023. 1

    2023

  26. [26]

    Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training

    Xiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 11975–11986, 2023. 1, 3, 4

    2023

  27. [27]

    A multimodal biomedical foun- dation model trained from fifteen million image–text pairs

    Sheng Zhang, Yanbo Xu, Naoto Usuyama, Hanwen Xu, Jaspreet Bagga, Robert Tinn, Sam Preston, Rajesh Rao, Mu Wei, Naveen Valluri, et al. A multimodal biomedical foun- dation model trained from fifteen million image–text pairs. NEJM AI, 2(1):AIoa2400640, 2025. 5

    2025

  28. [28]

    Acosta, Josh Miller, Ouwen Huang, and Pranav Rajpurkar

    Xiaoman Zhang, Juli ´an N Acosta, Josh Miller, Ouwen Huang, and Pranav Rajpurkar. Rexgradient-160k: A large- scale publicly available dataset of chest radiographs with free-text reports.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00228, 2025. 4, 5

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Contrastive learning of medical visual representations from paired images and text

    Yuhao Zhang, Hang Jiang, Yasuhide Miura, Christopher D Manning, and Curtis P Langlotz. Contrastive learning of medical visual representations from paired images and text. InMachine Learning for Healthcare Conference, pages 2–

  30. [30]

    Utiliz- ing longitudinal chest x-rays and reports to pre-fill radiology reports

    Qingqing Zhu, Tejas Sudharshan Mathai, Pritam Mukherjee, Yifan Peng, Ronald M Summers, and Zhiyong Lu. Utiliz- ing longitudinal chest x-rays and reports to pre-fill radiology reports. InInternational Conference on Medical Image Com- puting and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pages 189–198. Springer, 2023. 1

    2023

  31. [31]

    Symp- tom disentanglement in chest x-ray images for fine-grained progression learning

    Ye Zhu, Jingwen Xu, Fei Lyu, and Pong C Yuen. Symp- tom disentanglement in chest x-ray images for fine-grained progression learning. InInternational Conference on Med- ical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pages 598–607. Springer, 2024. 1 Temporal Inversion for Learning Interval Change in Chest X-Rays Supplementary Material

    2024

  32. [32]

    Model This section provides additional details on implementation, augmentations, hyperparameters, and model selection. 6.1. Implementation Details For pretraining, we use the AdamW optimizer with a co- sine learning-rate schedule and a 100-step warm-up. The learning rate is set to1×10 −4 with a batch size of 144, and all parameters are trained inbfloat16....

  33. [33]

    Projection layers for both image and text en- coders have dimension 128, and the CXR-BERT text en- coder is configured with a maximum token length of 256

    These experiments are performed on a single NVIDIA A6000 GPU. Projection layers for both image and text en- coders have dimension 128, and the CXR-BERT text en- coder is configured with a maximum token length of 256. 6.2. Augmentation Image augmentations follow the protocols described in BioViL-T [1] and ALTA [13] and are applied consistently across both ...

  34. [34]

    improved

    Data This section describes dataset splits, label generation pro- tocols, and ethical considerations, including specific details on theMS-CXR-T retrieval benchmark. 7.1. Dataset Splits We first exclude chest X-ray images without available prior images. The sample counts for each split are presented in Tab. 5. For CheXpert, since the official validation an...

    2010

  35. [35]

    Each sentence should contain only one of the following: (exclude the sentence with view position information) a) A clear radiological finding b) The absence of a specific condition (negative finding)

  36. [36]

    Treat each negative finding (absence of a condition) as a separate observation and split it into its own sentence

  37. [37]

    Keep sentences that describe view position information, but separate them from findings if they appear in the same original sentence

  38. [38]

    Exclude sentences that do not describe actual radiological find- ings or view positions, such as: - Procedural details - General com- ments about image quality - Patient positioning information (unless it’s specifically about the view position)

  39. [39]

    Maintain the meaning and context of the original findings and view positions while splitting

  40. [40]

    Minor sentence structure changes or addition of necessary words are allowed to ensure clarity

  41. [41]

    Remove any redundant information and express each finding or view position concisely

  42. [42]

    Each split sentence should be understandable independently

  43. [43]

    Example of splitting, including view position, and excluding non- findings: Original Report: ’1

    Avoid using lists or enumerations within a single sentence; instead, create separate sentences for each item. Example of splitting, including view position, and excluding non- findings: Original Report: ’1. A single frontal view of the chest is provided. 2. No consolidation, pleural effusion, or pneumothorax is observed in both lungs. 3. The heart size is...

  44. [44]

    * Remove any sentences that *solely* describe the view position (e.g., ”PA and lateral views were obtained.”, ”AP portable view.”, ”Single frontal view provided.”)

    **Preprocessing:** * Review the input CXR report. * Remove any sentences that *solely* describe the view position (e.g., ”PA and lateral views were obtained.”, ”AP portable view.”, ”Single frontal view provided.”). Do *not* remove view information if it’s integrated into a sentence describing a finding (though this is less common). * Retain all sentences ...

  45. [45]

    * **If the finding is mentioned:** * Locate the primary sentence(s) describing the status or appearance of the ’finding’

    **Modification based on Finding:** * Identify if the preprocessed report text contains mentions of the provided ’finding’. * **If the finding is mentioned:** * Locate the primary sentence(s) describing the status or appearance of the ’finding’. * Create three versions of the preprocessed report: * **Improved:** Modify the relevant sen- tence(s) minimally ...

  46. [46]

    ‘json{”improved

    **Output:** * Format the final output as a single JSON object string. * The JSON object must have exactly three keys: ‘”improved”‘, ‘”sta- ble”‘, and ‘”worsened”‘. * The value for each key should be the full text of the corresponding modified report generated in Step 2. Ensure the output is valid JSON. **Input Format Reminder:** The user will provide inpu...

  47. [47]

    no interval change

    Binary Interval-Change Dataset We construct binary interval-change labels (changevs.no change) from radiology report impressions across four datasets. Cases are labeled asno changeif the impres- sion contains the phrase“no interval change. ”Cases are labeled aschangeif the impression contains any of the following progression-related keywords: •Worsening:a...

  48. [48]

    Improved right pneumothorax

    Experiment 9.1. Zero-Shot Prompt Design For each finding and progression class, we design 12–17 distinct prompts to capture the diverse phrasing typically found in radiology reports. Using multiple prompts per class helps reduce score variance, as relying on a single tem- plate can lead to unstable results. During zero-shot classifi- cation, we compute th...

  49. [49]

    Clinical Utility of Reversed and Combined Evaluations Radiologists typically assess temporal progression only in the forward (standard) direction

    Additional Information 10.1. Clinical Utility of Reversed and Combined Evaluations Radiologists typically assess temporal progression only in the forward (standard) direction. TheReversedandCom- binedevaluations are therefore introduced as analytical tools to rigorously validate the reliability of forward pre- dictions. TheReversedevaluation tests whether...