arxiv: 2604.04764 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Gravitational waves production during preheating within GB gravity with monomial coupling

Brahim Asfour , Yahya Ladghami , Taoufik Ouali

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords gravitational wavespreheatingGauss-Bonnet gravityinflationspectral indexreheatingenergy densityobservational constraints

0 comments

The pith

In a Gauss-Bonnet gravity model with monomial potential and coupling, the energy density of gravitational waves produced during preheating is consistent with Planck constraints when expressed as a function of the scalar spectral index.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates gravitational wave production during the preheating era in a Gauss-Bonnet inflation model that employs a power-law potential for the scalar field and a monomial form for the Gauss-Bonnet coupling. By establishing a relation between the duration of preheating, the reheating phase, and the parameters of inflation, the authors are able to use existing observational limits from inflation to constrain the gravitational wave output. They calculate the present-day gravitational wave energy density and demonstrate that it lies within the bounds set by Planck data for a specific small negative value of the dimensionless coupling parameter, a particular equation of state during reheating, and a chosen preheating efficiency. This connection allows the model to satisfy current constraints without requiring separate measurements of the preheating stage.

Core claim

In this Gauss-Bonnet gravity model with power-law potential and monomial coupling, the generation of gravitational waves during preheating produces a present-day energy density that, when written in terms of the scalar spectral index, satisfies the Planck constraints for the choice of dimensionless Gauss-Bonnet coupling parameter α ≡ 4V0ξ0/3 = −1.5×10^{-6}, effective equation of state parameter ω = 1/6, and preheating efficiency parameter δ = 10^5.

What carries the argument

The link established between preheating duration, reheating phase, and inflationary parameters, which allows the gravitational-wave energy density to be expressed directly as a function of the scalar spectral index.

If this is right

The present-day gravitational-wave energy density becomes a direct function of the scalar spectral index.
This function yields values consistent with Planck data for the selected values of the coupling parameter α, the equation of state ω, and the efficiency δ.
Preheating in the model thus offers a testable prediction tied to inflation observables.
The specific parameter choices ensure the gravitational waves do not exceed observational limits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If confirmed, measurements of the spectral index could be used to infer properties of the preheating stage in this class of models.
The framework could be applied to other forms of the potential and coupling to explore different gravitational wave signals.
Future detectors sensitive to stochastic backgrounds might test the amplitude predicted for these parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The assumed link between preheating duration, reheating phase, and inflationary parameters is accurate and free of large uncertainties, and the specific numerical choices for α, ω, and δ are physically justified rather than selected solely to produce consistency with Planck data.

What would settle it

A measurement of the scalar spectral index together with the present-day gravitational wave energy density that falls outside the specific relation predicted for α = −1.5×10^{-6}, ω = 1/6, and δ = 10^5 would show the consistency does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04764 by Brahim Asfour, Taoufik Ouali, Yahya Ladghami.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: illustrates the evolution of the preheating duration, Npre, as a function of the number of e-folds, Nk, for three different values of the equation of state parameter: ω = 0, 1/6, 1/4, and for the coupling parameter α = −1.5 × 10−6 . Our findings reveal that the preheating duration is sensitive to EoS. Notably, ω = 1/4 leads to the shortest preheating phase, as Npre is smaller, indicating the most efficient… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Preheating duration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Variation of GW energy density versus the preheating duration, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Evolution of GW energy density as a function of the spectral index, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate the production of gravitational waves during the preheating era. To achieve this purpose, we consider Gauss-Bonnet inflation model with Power{\textendash}law potential, $V(\phi)= V_0 \phi^n$, and monomial Gauss-Bonnet coupling function, $\xi(\phi)= \xi_0 \phi^n$. We examine our model by comparing our findings with the current observational data. After that, we study the preheating stage by adopting an approach in which we establish a link between preheating duration, reheating phase and inflationary parameters. This step allows us to benefit from observational constraints imposed on inflation. Furthermore, we examine the production of gravitational waves during preheating epoch connecting the energy density to the preheating duration, $N_{pre}$, and then with the spectral index $n_s$. The generation of gravitational waves during preheating can satisfy observational constraints. In particular, the predicted present-day gravitational-wave energy density, expressed as a function of the scalar spectral index, is consistent with the Planck constraints for the choice of a dimensionless Gauss-Bonnet coupling parameter $\alpha \equiv 4V_{0}\xi_{0}/3 = -1.5\times 10^{-6}$, an effective equation of state parameter $\omega = 1/6$, and a preheating efficiency parameter $\delta = 10^{5}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper works out GW production during preheating in a monomial Gauss-Bonnet model and expresses the spectrum in terms of n_s, but the reported Planck consistency only appears after fixing alpha, omega, and delta to three specific numbers.

read the letter

This paper calculates gravitational-wave production during preheating in a Gauss-Bonnet model with monomial potential and coupling. The main result is that the present-day GW energy density can be made consistent with Planck bounds once three parameters are set to particular values. The new element is the explicit connection they draw between the length of the preheating stage, the effective equation of state during reheating, and the inflationary spectral index. That lets them write the GW spectrum as a function of n_s rather than leaving it in terms of free preheating parameters. The technical steps follow the standard treatment of parametric resonance and tensor mode production, so the formalism itself is not the issue. The weakness is that the consistency only appears after fixing the dimensionless coupling alpha to -1.5 times 10^{-6}, the equation-of-state parameter omega to 1/6, and the efficiency delta to 10^5. The abstract gives no indication that these values are fixed by the model equations or by a prior constraint; they read as choices made so the curve falls inside the allowed region. Without a scan over nearby values or a derivation showing why omega equals one sixth for this potential, the result stays closer to a tuned example than to a robust prediction. The mapping from preheating duration to n_s also carries the usual uncertainties from the reheating phase, and those are not quantified here. This work is for people already following modified-gravity inflation and early-universe gravitational waves. A reader looking for a worked example of how preheating observables can be tied to CMB data will get something concrete to examine. It is not broad enough or novel enough to change the field, but the calculation is self-contained and the authors engage with the relevant literature on GB preheating. I would recommend sending it to peer review. A referee can check whether the parameter choices are justified in the body of the paper and whether the error budget on the N_pre to n_s link is properly estimated.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

GW 'prediction' Ω_GW,0(n_s) lies inside Planck bounds only after fixing α=-1.5e-6, ω=1/6, δ=10^5 and assuming an un-derived N_pre-to-n_s map

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"the predicted present-day gravitational-wave energy density, expressed as a function of the scalar spectral index, is consistent with the Planck constraints for the choice of a dimensionless Gauss-Bonnet coupling parameter α ≡ 4V0ξ0/3 = −1.5×10−6, an effective equation of state parameter ω = 1/6, and a preheating efficiency parameter δ = 10^5"

The central claim is that the derived Ω_GW,0(n_s) satisfies constraints. This holds only after the three parameters are fixed to the quoted numbers; the functional dependence on n_s is obtained by substituting the chosen ω and δ into the GW formula and the N_pre–n_s relation, so the consistency is a direct consequence of the input selection rather than a model prediction.

full rationale

The paper links preheating duration N_pre to inflationary observables via an effective equation-of-state ω during reheating, inserts an efficiency δ into the GW production formula, and then expresses the present-day energy density as a function of n_s. The abstract explicitly states that consistency with Planck constraints holds for the specific numerical choices α ≡ 4V0ξ0/3 = -1.5×10^{-6}, ω = 1/6, and δ = 10^5. These values are not derived from the GB monomial dynamics or shown to be attractor values; they are selected so that the resulting curve falls inside the observational window. Consequently the reported 'prediction' is statistically forced by the input choices rather than an independent output of the model equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on three free parameters tuned to achieve observational consistency plus standard domain assumptions of inflationary cosmology and preheating dynamics in Gauss-Bonnet gravity.

free parameters (3)

alpha = -1.5e-6
Dimensionless Gauss-Bonnet coupling strength fixed at -1.5e-6 to produce consistency with Planck constraints.
omega = 1/6
Effective equation-of-state parameter during preheating fixed at 1/6 for the model.
delta = 10^5
Preheating efficiency parameter fixed at 10^5 to match observations.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard assumptions of inflationary cosmology and preheating dynamics hold inside the Gauss-Bonnet framework.
Used to establish the link between preheating duration and inflationary parameters.
domain assumption Monomial forms for both the potential and the Gauss-Bonnet coupling are appropriate for the model.
Adopted throughout the investigation of inflation and preheating.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5557 in / 1767 out tokens · 95628 ms · 2026-05-10T19:25:56.644596+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the predicted present-day gravitational-wave energy density... is consistent with the Planck constraints for the choice of a dimensionless Gauss-Bonnet coupling parameter α ≡ 4V0ξ0/3 = −1.5×10^{-6}, an effective equation of state parameter ω = 1/6, and a preheating efficiency parameter δ = 10^5
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/Constants.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

N_pre = [60.0085 − (1/4)ln(30λ_end/(δ g_re π²)) − ...] − (1−3ω)/4 N_re

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91, 99-102 (1980)

1980
[2]

The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

A. H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D23, 347-356 (1981)

1981
[3]

A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,

A. D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,” Phys. Lett. B108, 389-393 (1982)

1982
[4]

Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,

A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220-1223 (1982)

1982
[5]

Chaotic Inflation,

A. D. Linde, “Chaotic Inflation,” Phys. Lett. B129, 177-181 (1983)

1983
[6]

Dynamics of the Universe and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,

D. Kazanas, “Dynamics of the Universe and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,” Astrophys. J. Lett.241, L59-L63 (1980)

1980
[7]

Induced gravity effect on inflationary parameters in a holographic cosmology,

A. Bargach, F. Bargach, A. Errahmani and T. Ouali, “Induced gravity effect on inflationary parameters in a holographic cosmology,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29, no.02, 2050010 (2020) [hep-th/1904.06282]

work page arXiv 2020
[8]

Non-minimal Higgs inflation within holographic cosmology,

A. Bargach, F. Bargach, M. Bouhmadi-L´ opez and T. Ouali, “Non-minimal Higgs inflation within holographic cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D102, 123540 (2020) [gr-qc/2012.04342]

work page arXiv 2020
[9]

Higgs inflation model with non-minimal coupling in hybrid Palatini 10 approach,

B. Asfour, A. Bargach, A. Errahmani and T. Ouali, “Higgs inflation model with non-minimal coupling in hybrid Palatini 10 approach,” Chin. Phys. C48, no.4, 045104 (2024) [gr-qc/2209.11541]

work page arXiv 2024
[10]

Constraints on tachyon inflationary models with an AdS/CFT correspondence,

Z. Bouabdallaoui, A. Errahmani, M. Bouhmadi-Lopez and T. Ouali, “Constraints on tachyon inflationary models with an AdS/CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.12, 123508 (2016) [hep-th/1610.01963]

work page arXiv 2016
[11]

Scalar warm inflation in holographic cosmology,

Z. Bouabdallaoui, A. Errahmani, M. Bouhmadi-L´ opez and T. Ouali, “Scalar warm inflation in holographic cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.4, 043513 (2022) [hep-th/2203.05047]

work page arXiv 2022
[12]

Particle Production in the New Inflationary Cosmology,

L. F. Abbott, E. Farhi and M. B. Wise, “Particle Production in the New Inflationary Cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B117, 29 (1982)

1982
[13]

Baryon Asymmetry in Inflationary Universe,

A. D. Dolgov and A. D. Linde, “Baryon Asymmetry in Inflationary Universe,” Phys. Lett. B116, 329 (1982)

1982
[14]

Reheating an Inflationary Universe,

A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner and F. Wilczek, “Reheating an Inflationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1437 (1982)

1982
[15]

Particle Production During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions,

J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, “Particle Production During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions,” Phys. Rev. D42, 2491-2504 (1990)

1990
[16]

Shtanov, J

Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, “Universe reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D51, 5438-5455 (1995) [hep-ph/9407247]

work page arXiv 1995
[17]

Reheating after inflation,

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3195-3198 (1994) [hep- th/9405187]

work page arXiv 1994
[18]

Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review

M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser and J. Karouby, “Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530003 (2014) [hep-ph/1410.3808]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[19]

Constraints on the reheating phase after Higgs inflation in the hybrid metric-Palatini approach,

B. Asfour, A. Bargach, Y. Ladghami, A. Errahmani and T. Ouali, “Constraints on the reheating phase after Higgs inflation in the hybrid metric-Palatini approach,” Phys. Lett. B853, 138679 (2024) [gr-qc/2404.15535]

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Reheating constraints for an induced gravity model with a holographic description,

F. Bargach, A. Bargach, B. Asfour, A. Oukouiss and T. Ouali, “Reheating constraints for an induced gravity model with a holographic description,” Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102080 (2025)

2025
[21]

Kofman, A

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Towards the theory of reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D56, 3258-3295 (1997) [hep-ph/9704452]

work page arXiv 1997
[22]

Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation,

P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D56, 6175-6192 (1997) [hep-ph/9705347]

work page arXiv 1997
[23]

ON PARTICLE CREATION BY A TIME DEPENDENT SCALAR FIELD,

A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, “ON PARTICLE CREATION BY A TIME DEPENDENT SCALAR FIELD,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.51, 172-177 (1990) JINR-E2-89-321

1990
[24]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

Y. Akramiet al.[Planck], “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020) [astro- ph.CO/1807.06211]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2018
[25]

Reheating constraints to inflationary models,

L. Dai, M. Kamionkowski and J. Wang, “Reheating constraints to inflationary models,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 041302 (2014) [astro-ph.CO/1404.6704]

work page arXiv 2014
[27]

Khlebnikov and I.I

S. Y. Khlebnikov and I. I. Tkachev, “Relic gravitational waves produced after preheating,” Phys. Rev. D56, 653-660 (1997) [hep-ph/9701423]

work page arXiv 1997
[28]

Preheating in the Standard Model with the Higgs-Inflaton coupled to gravity,

J. Garcia-Bellido, D. G. Figueroa and J. Rubio, “Preheating in the Standard Model with the Higgs-Inflaton coupled to gravity,” Phys. Rev. D79, 063531 (2009) [hep-ph/0812.4624]

work page arXiv 2009
[29]

Preheating after Higgs Inflation: Self-Resonance and Gauge boson production,

E. I. Sfakianakis and J. van de Vis, “Preheating after Higgs Inflation: Self-Resonance and Gauge boson production,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.8, 083519 (2019) [hep-ph/1810.01304]

work page arXiv 2019
[30]

Preheating after multifield in- flation with nonminimal couplings, III: Dynamical spacetime results,

M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Preheating after multifield in- flation with nonminimal couplings, III: Dynamical spacetime results,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.2, 023528 (2018) [astro- ph.CO/1610.08916]

work page arXiv 2018
[31]

Preheating after multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings, II: Resonance Structure,

M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Preheating after multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings, II: Resonance Structure,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.2, 023527 (2018) [astro-ph.CO/1610.08868]

work page arXiv 2018
[32]

Violent Preheating in Inflation with Nonminimal Coupling,

Y. Ema, R. Jinno, K. Mukaida and K. Nakayama, “Violent Preheating in Inflation with Nonminimal Coupling,” JCAP 02, 045 (2017) [hep-ph/1609.05209]

work page arXiv 2017
[33]

Combined Preheating on the lattice with applications to Higgs inflation,

J. Repond and J. Rubio, “Combined Preheating on the lattice with applications to Higgs inflation,” JCAP07, 043 (2016) [astro-ph.CO/1604.08238]

work page arXiv 2016
[34]

Preheating after Multifield Inflation with Nonminimal Couplings, I: Covariant Formalism and Attractor Behavior,

M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Preheating after Multifield Inflation with Nonminimal Couplings, I: Covariant Formalism and Attractor Behavior,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.2, 023526 (2018) [astro-ph.CO/1510.08553]

work page arXiv 2018
[35]

Tachyonic instability and dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking,

G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and A. D. Linde, “Tachyonic instability and dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. D64, 123517 (2001) [hep-th/0106179]

work page arXiv 2001
[36]

Dynamics of symmetry breaking and tachyonic preheating,

G. N. Felder, J. Garcia-Bellido, P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and I. Tkachev, “Dynamics of symmetry breaking and tachyonic preheating,” Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 011601 (2001) [hep-ph/0012142]

work page arXiv 2001
[37]

Preheating in Palatini Higgs inflation,

J. Rubio and E. S. Tomberg, “Preheating in Palatini Higgs inflation,” JCAP04, 021 (2019) [hep-ph/1902.10148]

work page arXiv 2019
[38]

Preheating in Palatini Higgs inflation on the lattice,

F. Dux, A. Florio, J. Klari´ c, A. Shkerin and I. Timiryasov, “Preheating in Palatini Higgs inflation on the lattice,” JCAP 09, 015 (2022) [hep-ph/2203.13286]

work page arXiv 2022
[39]

Primordial black holes and gravitational waves in teleparallel Gravity,

K. El Bourakadi, B. Asfour, Z. Sakhi, Z. M. Bennai and T. Ouali, “Primordial black holes and gravitational waves in teleparallel Gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C82, no.9, 792 (2022) [gr-qc/2209.08585]

work page arXiv 2022
[40]

Flat energy spectrum of primordial gravitational waves versus peaks and the NANOGrav 2023 obser- vation,

V. K. Oikonomou, “Flat energy spectrum of primordial gravitational waves versus peaks and the NANOGrav 2023 obser- vation,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.4, 043516 (2023) [astro-ph.CO/2306.17351]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

Implications of a scalar field interacting with the dark matter fluid on primordial gravitational waves,

V. K. Oikonomou, “Implications of a scalar field interacting with the dark matter fluid on primordial gravitational waves,” 11 Phys. Rev. D110, no.2, 023535 (2024) [gr-qc/2406.09604]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

Gravitational waves from preheating in Gauss–Bonnet inflation,

K. El Bourakadi, M. Ferricha-Alami, H. Filali, Z. Sakhi and M. Bennai, “Gravitational waves from preheating in Gauss–Bonnet inflation,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, no.12, 1144 (2021) [gr-qc/2209.08581]

work page arXiv 2021
[43]

Preheating constraints inα-attractor inflation and gravitational waves pro- duction,

K. El Bourakadi, Z. Sakhi and M. Bennai, “Preheating constraints inα-attractor inflation and gravitational waves pro- duction,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A37, no.17, 2250117 (2022) [gr-qc/2209.09241]

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

Aggarwal et al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies,Living Rev

N. Aggarwal, O. D. Aguiar, A. Bauswein, G. Cella, S. Clesse, A. M. Cruise, V. Domcke, D. G. Figueroa, A. Geraci and M. Goryachev,et al.“Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies,” Living Rev. Rel.24, no.1, 4 (2021) [gr-qc/2011.12414]

work page arXiv 2021
[45]

Franciolini, A

G. Franciolini, A. Maharana and F. Muia, “Hunt for light primordial black hole dark matter with ultrahigh-frequency gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.10, 103520 (2022) [astro-ph.CO/2205.02153]

work page arXiv 2022
[46]

Slow-roll Inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons Corrections,

M. Satoh, “Slow-roll Inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons Corrections,” JCAP11, 024 (2010) [astro- ph.CO/1008.2724]

work page arXiv 2010
[47]

Slow-roll inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet correction,

Z. K. Guo and D. J. Schwarz, “Slow-roll inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet correction,” Phys. Rev. D81, 123520 (2010) [hep-th/1001.1897]

work page arXiv 2010
[48]

Inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term,

P. X. Jiang, J. W. Hu and Z. K. Guo, “Inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term,” Phys. Rev. D88, 123508 (2013) [hep-th/1310.5579]

work page arXiv 2013
[49]

Anomalies, Topological Invariants and the Gauss-Bonnet Theorem in Super- gravity,

P. K. Townsend and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Anomalies, Topological Invariants and the Gauss-Bonnet Theorem in Super- gravity,” Phys. Rev. D19, 3592 (1979)

1979
[50]

String Generated Gravity Models,

D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, “String Generated Gravity Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2656 (1985)

1985
[51]

Observational constraints on slow-roll inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term,

S. Koh, B. H. Lee, W. Lee and G. Tumurtushaa, “Observational constraints on slow-roll inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term,” Phys. Rev. D90, no.6, 063527 (2014) [gr-qc/1404.6096]

work page arXiv 2014
[52]

Reconstruction of the Scalar Field Potential in Inflationary Models with a Gauss-Bonnet term,

S. Koh, B. H. Lee and G. Tumurtushaa, “Reconstruction of the Scalar Field Potential in Inflationary Models with a Gauss-Bonnet term,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.12, 123509 (2017) [gr-qc/1610.04360]

work page arXiv 2017
[53]

Constraints on the reheating parameters after Gauss-Bonnet inflation from primordial gravitational waves,

S. Koh, B. H. Lee and G. Tumurtushaa, “Constraints on the reheating parameters after Gauss-Bonnet inflation from primordial gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.10, 103511 (2018) [astro-ph.CO/1807.04424]

work page arXiv 2018
[54]

Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite,

L. Amendola, S. Appleby, A. Avgoustidis, D. Bacon, T. Baker, M. Baldi, N. Bartolo, A. Blanchard, C. Bonvin and S. Borgani,et al.“Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite,” Living Rev. Rel.21, no.1, 2 (2018) [astro-ph.CO/1606.00180]

work page arXiv 2018
[55]

Dufaux, A

J. F. Dufaux, A. Bergman, G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and J. P. Uzan, “Theory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheating after Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D76, 123517 (2007) [astro-ph/0707.0875]

work page arXiv 2007
[56]

Gravitational waves from gauge preheating,

P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin and Z. J. Weiner, “Gravitational waves from gauge preheating,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.4, 043525 (2018) [astro-ph.CO/1805.04550]

work page arXiv 2018
[57]

Production of gravitational waves during preheating inα-attractor inflation,

J. Li, H. Yu and P. Wu, “Production of gravitational waves during preheating inα-attractor inflation,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.8, 083522 (2020)

2020
[58]

C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1973

1973