arxiv: 2604.05696 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Monodromy-Matrix Description of Extremal Multi-centered Black Holes

Jun-ichi Sakamoto , Shinya Tomizawa

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords Breitenlohner-Maisonmonodromy matrixmulti-center black holesfive-dimensional supergravityBPS solutionsalmost-BPScoset modelSO(4,4)

0 comments

The pith

The Breitenlohner-Maison formalism encodes extremal multi-center black holes via explicit monodromy matrices in the SO(4,4) coset model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that after dimensional reduction, extremal black hole solutions in five-dimensional U(1)^3 supergravity are captured by coset and monodromy matrices in the SO(4,4)/[SO(2,2)×SO(2,2)] sigma model. For BPS solutions of Bena-Warner type, these matrices have an exponential form based on nilpotent elements, enabling factorization of their pole structures to recover the spacetime. The same framework applies to almost-BPS solutions and to the extremal limits of the Rasheed-Larsen rotating black hole, with regularity conditions simplifying higher-order poles in two-center configurations. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a single matrix-based language that generates and relates previously separate families of solutions.

Core claim

After reduction to three dimensions the system becomes a coset sigma model whose solutions are encoded in coset matrices and monodromy matrices. For Bena-Warner BPS solutions the monodromy matrices admit an exponential representation governed by nilpotent elements of so(4,4) and can be factorized explicitly despite the presence of double poles. The same construction is carried out for almost-BPS solutions. In the two-center black-ring case a third-order pole appears but disappears once regularity is imposed. The fast-rotating extremal Rasheed-Larsen solution is governed by idempotent elements while the slow-rotating branch is related by an explicit SO(4,4) duality transformation to a single-

What carries the argument

The monodromy matrix of the Breitenlohner-Maison linear system, factorized in the nilpotent algebra of so(4,4) to reconstruct multi-centered solutions from their pole data.

If this is right

Bena-Warner multi-center BPS solutions can be reconstructed from their monodromy matrices via nilpotent factorization.
Almost-BPS solutions admit analogous matrix descriptions without additional constraints.
Regularity of two-center black rings eliminates third-order poles in the monodromy matrix.
The fast-rotating extremal limit of the Rasheed-Larsen solution is described by idempotent elements.
An SO(4,4) duality maps the slowly rotating Rasheed-Larsen branch onto a single-center almost-BPS configuration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This matrix approach could be used to search for new multi-center solutions by prescribing different pole structures in the monodromy matrix.
It suggests that the distinction between BPS and almost-BPS cases is encoded simply in the choice of nilpotent versus other elements.
The formalism might extend to other supergravity theories with similar coset structures.

Load-bearing premise

That the monodromy matrices for the two-center black ring admit an explicit factorization in the nilpotent algebra of so(4,4) once regularity is imposed.

What would settle it

If the explicit factorization of the monodromy matrix for a regular two-center black ring cannot be found or fails to reproduce the known fields, the unified framework would be invalidated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05696 by Jun-ichi Sakamoto, Shinya Tomizawa.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Rod diagram for the BMPV black hole. The white circle represents the center on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Rod diagram for 5D supersymmetric black ring. The white circles and black circles denote the centers on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Rod diagram for 5D supersymmetric black lens with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Rod diagram for 5D Kunduri-Lucietti black hole with non-trivial DOC. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study solution-generating techniques based on the Breitenlohner--Maison linear system for extremal, stationary biaxisymmetric black hole solutions in five-dimensional $U(1)^3$ supergravity. Focusing on multi-center configurations over a Gibbons--Hawking base, we analyze both BPS and almost-BPS solutions, including rotating single-center black holes and two-center black rings. After dimensional reduction to three dimensions, the system is described by a coset sigma model with target space $SO(4,4)/[SO(2,2)\times SO(2,2)]$, where solutions are encoded in coset and monodromy matrices. For Bena--Warner BPS solutions, we construct the coset and monodromy matrices and show that they admit an exponential representation governed by nilpotent elements. Although the monodromy matrices generically exhibit double poles, they can be factorized explicitly using the nilpotent algebra of $\mathfrak{so}(4,4)$, reconstructing the solutions. We extend this to almost-BPS solutions and derive the corresponding matrices. While the single-center case exhibits commuting residues, the two-center black ring leads to a more intricate structure with a third-order pole, which disappears when regularity is imposed. Finally, we analyze the extremal limits of the Rasheed--Larsen solution, where the fast-rotating branch is governed by idempotent elements. We also construct an explicit $SO(4,4)$ duality transformation relating the slowly-rotating branch to a single-center almost-BPS solution. These results will provide the BM formalism as a unified framework for extremal multi-center black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops solution-generating techniques based on the Breitenlohner-Maison linear system for extremal stationary biaxisymmetric black holes in five-dimensional U(1)^3 supergravity. It reduces the system to a coset sigma model with target space SO(4,4)/[SO(2,2)×SO(2,2)], constructs explicit coset and monodromy matrices for Bena-Warner BPS multi-center solutions and almost-BPS configurations (including two-center black rings), demonstrates exponential nilpotent factorizations in so(4,4) for double-pole cases, shows that a third-order pole in the black-ring monodromy matrix disappears under regularity, and analyzes duality transformations and idempotent elements in the extremal Rasheed-Larsen solutions, with the goal of establishing the BM formalism as a unified framework.

Significance. If the explicit algebraic constructions and factorizations are verified, the work would provide a systematic coset/monodromy-matrix approach to extremal multi-center solutions, unifying BPS and almost-BPS cases through the same nilpotent algebra and offering concrete duality maps that reconstruct known solutions. The explicit handling of pole structures under regularity conditions and the reduction to already-known single-center cases are positive features that strengthen the algebraic reconstruction claim.

major comments (2)

[Section on almost-BPS solutions / two-center black ring] The central claim that the BM formalism unifies all extremal multi-center solutions requires that the third-order pole in the two-center black-ring monodromy matrix factorizes explicitly via nilpotent so(4,4) elements once regularity is imposed. The manuscript must supply the explicit pre- and post-regularity monodromy matrix, the regularity condition, the nilpotent generators used for factorization, and verification that the residues lie in the nilpotent subalgebra and satisfy the commuting-residue conditions needed for reconstruction (see the section discussing the two-center black ring).
[Section on Bena-Warner BPS solutions] For the Bena-Warner BPS solutions, the statement that double-pole monodromy matrices admit an exponential representation governed by nilpotent elements of so(4,4) is load-bearing for the unified framework. The paper should give the explicit nilpotent elements, the resulting factorization, and the direct reconstruction of the solution parameters to confirm consistency with the coset structure (see the section on Bena-Warner BPS solutions).

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and conclusions] The abstract states that the results 'will provide the BM formalism as a unified framework'; a dedicated concluding section summarizing the precise scope, limitations, and open cases for the unification would improve clarity.
[Coset model setup] Notation for the coset space SO(4,4)/[SO(2,2)×SO(2,2)] and the explicit matrix representations of the nilpotent subalgebra would benefit from an appendix or table for reader accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the potential of the Breitenlohner-Maison formalism as a unified framework for extremal multi-center solutions. We address the two major comments below, providing clarifications on the existing constructions and indicating revisions to enhance explicitness where requested.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section on almost-BPS solutions / two-center black ring] The central claim that the BM formalism unifies all extremal multi-center solutions requires that the third-order pole in the two-center black-ring monodromy matrix factorizes explicitly via nilpotent so(4,4) elements once regularity is imposed. The manuscript must supply the explicit pre- and post-regularity monodromy matrix, the regularity condition, the nilpotent generators used for factorization, and verification that the residues lie in the nilpotent subalgebra and satisfy the commuting-residue conditions needed for reconstruction (see the section discussing the two-center black ring).

Authors: We agree that greater explicitness on the two-center black-ring case would strengthen the presentation of the unified framework. The manuscript derives the monodromy matrix exhibiting the third-order pole and states that this pole disappears under the regularity condition (which enforces the absence of closed timelike curves and ensures the solution reduces to a valid almost-BPS configuration). The post-regularity matrix then admits a factorization into nilpotent elements of so(4,4), consistent with the coset structure and the reconstruction of the known two-center solution. To address the request directly, we will add in the revised manuscript: the explicit pre- and post-regularity monodromy matrices, the precise regularity condition, the nilpotent generators entering the factorization, and verification that the residues lie in the nilpotent subalgebra while satisfying the commuting-residue conditions required for the linear system. These additions will make the reconstruction fully transparent without altering the results. revision: yes
Referee: [Section on Bena-Warner BPS solutions] For the Bena-Warner BPS solutions, the statement that double-pole monodromy matrices admit an exponential representation governed by nilpotent elements of so(4,4) is load-bearing for the unified framework. The paper should give the explicit nilpotent elements, the resulting factorization, and the direct reconstruction of the solution parameters to confirm consistency with the coset structure (see the section on Bena-Warner BPS solutions).

Authors: The manuscript already constructs the coset and monodromy matrices for the Bena-Warner BPS solutions and demonstrates that the double-pole monodromy matrices admit an exponential representation via nilpotent elements of so(4,4), with explicit factorization that reconstructs the solution parameters (including the positions and charges of the centers). This is shown to be consistent with the SO(4,4)/[SO(2,2)×SO(2,2)] coset structure. To make the algebraic steps fully self-contained as requested, we will expand the relevant section in the revision to include the explicit nilpotent generators, the step-by-step factorization, and the direct mapping back to the Bena-Warner parameters. These additions will confirm the consistency without changing any conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: explicit constructions from standard BM formalism

full rationale

The paper begins with the established Breitenlohner-Maison linear system and the coset sigma model on SO(4,4)/[SO(2,2)×SO(2,2)] after dimensional reduction. It then explicitly constructs the coset and monodromy matrices for known Bena-Warner BPS solutions (showing double-pole factorization via nilpotent so(4,4) elements) and extends the same procedure to almost-BPS cases including the two-center black ring (where the third-order pole cancels under regularity) and Rasheed-Larsen extremal limits. These are direct matrix computations and duality transformations applied to existing solutions, not self-definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The claimed unification follows from the explicit reconstructions rather than reducing to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on the established Breitenlohner-Maison linear system and the coset sigma-model structure for the dimensionally reduced theory without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The Breitenlohner-Maison linear system encodes solutions of the 3D coset sigma model with target SO(4,4)/[SO(2,2)×SO(2,2)] via coset and monodromy matrices.
Invoked at the outset to represent all considered black hole solutions.
domain assumption Nilpotent elements of the Lie algebra so(4,4) generate the exponential form of the monodromy matrices for Bena-Warner BPS solutions.
Used to construct and factorize the matrices for the BPS case.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 1582 out tokens · 53817 ms · 2026-05-10T19:37:36.598963+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the monodromy matrices generically exhibit double poles, they can be factorized explicitly using the nilpotent algebra of so(4,4)... the two-center black ring leads to a more intricate structure with a third-order pole, which disappears when regularity is imposed

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

BMPV black hole The BMPV black hole (Breckenridge-Myers-Peet-Vafa) is a solution of a 5D BPS rotating black hole that carries a charge with angular momentum [20]. The corresponding harmonic functions are V= 1 r , K= k1 r , L= 1 + l1 r , M=m 0 .(172) In this solution, the asymptotic flatness condition (25) is identified with the condition (159) for the abs...
[2]

[21] as a BPS solution of 5D minimal supergravity, and the explicit expressions of the corresponding harmonic functions was subsequently presented in Ref

(Multi-)supersymmetric black ring The supersymmetric black ring has been constructed in Ref. [21] as a BPS solution of 5D minimal supergravity, and the explicit expressions of the corresponding harmonic functions was subsequently presented in Ref. [78]. These harmonic functions involve two centers and are given by V= 1 r1 , K=− q 2 1 r2 , L= 1 + Q−q 2 4 1...
[3]

The associated eight harmonic functions are given by [22, 23] V= NX i=1 qi ri = N r1 − NX i=2 1 ri , K= NX i=1 ki ri , L= 1 + NX i=1 li ri , M=m 0 + NX i=1 mi ri

Supersymmetric black lens Next, we consider a supersymmetric black lens solution with the horizon topologyL(N,1) =S 3/ZN. The associated eight harmonic functions are given by [22, 23] V= NX i=1 qi ri = N r1 − NX i=2 1 ri , K= NX i=1 ki ri , L= 1 + NX i=1 li ri , M=m 0 + NX i=1 mi ri . (189) WhenN= 1, the set of the harmonic functions reduces to that of th...
[4]

Nevertheless, the topological censorship theorem of Friedman [80] allows for a broader class of black hole spacetimes

Kunduri-Lucietti black hole with non-trivial DOC The exterior region of the BMPV black hole horizon is topologically trivial in the sense that a spatial slice Σ is diffeomorphic toR 3 \B3, whereB 3 denotes the black hole interior. Nevertheless, the topological censorship theorem of Friedman [80] allows for a broader class of black hole spacetimes. In part...
[5]

This limit gives an ergo-free extremal rotating black hole, which can be mapped to an almost-BPS solution via aU-duality transformation

Extremal limits of Rasheed-Larsen solution This 4D black hole solution has two different extremal limits, depending on the ratio of the angular momentumJ and the productP Qof the electric and magnetic charges: •Slowly rotating extremal limit|J|<|P Q|: This extremal limit is realized by taking the limitm→0, a→0 withj=a/m=fixed. This limit gives an ergo-fre...
[6]

Slowly rotating extremal limit We first consider the slowly rotating extremal limit (215). In this limit, the two poles of the monodromy matrix (224) collide, giving rise to a reduced monodromy matrix with a second-order pole MSlow(w) = 1 + A(1) w + A(2) w2 .(228) The residue matricesA (1) and eA(2) =A (2) − 1 2(A(1))2 are elements ofso(4,4) and can be ex...
[7]

Fast rotating extremal black hole Next, we consider the fast rotating extremal limit. The monodromy matrix for the fast rotating extremal black hole is given by MFast(w) = 1 + A(1) w + A(2) w2 ,(235) where the residue matricesA (1) and eA(2) =A (2) − 1 2(A(1))2 are A(1) = q 2 −p H0 − 1 2 q 3X j=1 Hj + 2P(E0 −F 0)−2Q(E q0 −F q0),(236) eA(2) = 2P Q√pq   p...
[8]

Self-duality case We first consider the general solution to the self-duality equation (7). In terms of the orthonormal framee a, the 2-forms ΘI =dB I on the 4D Gibbons–Hawking space can be expanded as ΘI =α I 2 +e ψ ∧β I 1 ,(A5) whereα 2 andβ 1 are arbitrary 2-form and 1-form on the 3D Euclidean space. The action of the Hodge star operator ⋆4 on each term...
[9]

=⋆ 3βI 1 .(A6) Imposing the self-duality condition⋆ 4ΘI = ΘI, we obtain ⋆4ΘI =−⋆ 3 αI 2 ∧e ψ +⋆ 3βI 1 =α I 2 +e ψ ∧β I 1 = ΘI ,(A7) which leads to βI 1 =⋆ 3αI 2 .(A8) For later convenience, we redefineβ I 1 as ¯βI 1 :=V −1βI 1 ,(A9) and then Θ I can be written as ΘI = (dψ+ϖ)∧ ¯βI 1 +V ⋆ 3 ¯βI 1 .(A10) Since ΘI must be closeddΘ I = 0, we have constraints d...
[10]

The first term meansd ¯βI = 0, and we introduce the scalar functionsγ I such that ¯βI =dγ I

= 0,(A11) 41 where we used⋆ 3dϖ=dV. The first term meansd ¯βI = 0, and we introduce the scalar functionsγ I such that ¯βI =dγ I. The remaining term can be rewritten as d ⋆3 d(V γ I) = 0,(A12) where we usedd ⋆ 3 dV= 0. This equations have the solution γI =− 1 V K I ,(A13) whereK I is a harmonic function onR 3. Hence, we obtain ΘI =d(V K I)∧(dψ+ϖ)−V ⋆ 3 d(V...
[11]

We can again employ the ansatz (A5) of Θ I

Anti-self-duality case Next, we will solve the anti-self-duality equation (8). We can again employ the ansatz (A5) of Θ I. Imposing the anti-self-duality condition⋆ 4ΘI =−Θ I, we obtain ⋆4ΘI =−⋆ 3 αI 2 ∧e ψ +⋆ 3βI 1 =−α I 2 −e ψ ∧β I 1 =−Θ I ,(A25) which leads to βI 1 =−⋆ 3 αI 2 .(A26) As in the BPS case, we introduce ¯βI 1 as ¯βI 1 :=V −1βI 1 ,(A27) and ...
[12]

From the first term, we obtaind ¯βI = 0 and then denote ¯βI by ¯βI 1 =−dK I, whereK I are new scalar functions onR 3

= 0,(A29) where we used⋆ 3dϖ=dVi.e.dϖ=⋆ 3dV. From the first term, we obtaind ¯βI = 0 and then denote ¯βI by ¯βI 1 =−dK I, whereK I are new scalar functions onR 3. The remaining term leads to −⋆ 3 dV∧dK I +dV∧⋆ 3dK I +V d(⋆ 3dK I) = 0.(A30) Since the first two terms are identically canceled out, we obtaind(⋆ 3dK I) = 0, and hence the scalar functionsK I ar...
[13]

Explicit expression of scalar fieldσ Here, we write down the explicit expressions of the scalar fieldσfor the Rasheed-Larsen rotating black hole solution. The scalar fieldσis given by σ=− σ′ 4m3(p+q) 2H1(H1H3 −(ω a t )2) .(C1) The numerator ofσis given by σ′ = √p√q aQcosθ 8a4 cos4 θm2p(p+q) 2 +a 2 cos2 θ 16m5(2p−q)(p+q) + 8m 4 2p3 +p 2(q−4r)−2pqr−q 2(q−2r...
[14]

Explicit expressions of monodromy matrix Here, we present explicit expressions for the factorsF ± ij appearing in the residue matrices of the monodromy matrix (224). Their expressions are given as follows: F ± 14 = 2(p+q) √qF ± 3 aq√p P− m√q Q(p±2α) ,(C3) F ± 17 =− 2√p F ± 1 (F ± 2 )2F ± 3 √q (F (1) 17 ±αF (2) 17 )− 2(p+q)√p√q P Q(F(3) 17 ±αF (4) 17 ) ,(C...
[15]

Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” Phys. Lett. B379, 99-104 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9601029 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1996
[16]

Black holes and submillimeter dimensions,

P. C. Argyres, S. Dimopoulos and J. March-Russell, “Black holes and submillimeter dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B441, 96 (1998) [hep-th/9808138]

work page arXiv 1998
[17]

Uniqueness theorem for 5-dimensional black holes with two axial Killing fields,

S. Hollands and S. Yazadjiev, “Uniqueness theorem for 5-dimensional black holes with two axial Killing fields,” Commun. Math. Phys.283, 749-768 (2008) [arXiv:0707.2775 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2008
[18]

On the Topology and area of higher dimensional black holes,

M. l. Cai and G. J. Galloway, “On the Topology and area of higher dimensional black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav.18, 2707 (2001) [hep-th/0102149]

work page arXiv 2001
[19]

A Generalization of Hawking’s black hole topology theorem to higher dimensions,

G. J. Galloway and R. Schoen, “A Generalization of Hawking’s black hole topology theorem to higher dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys.266, 571 (2006) [gr-qc/0509107]

work page arXiv 2006
[20]

Schwarzschild field in n dimensions and the dimensionality of space problem,

F. R. Tangherlini, “Schwarzschild field in n dimensions and the dimensionality of space problem,” Nuovo Cim.27, 636 (1963)

1963
[21]

Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times,

R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, “Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times,” Annals Phys.172, 304 (1986)

1986
[22]

A rotating black ring in five dimensions

R. Emparan and H. S. Reall, “A Rotating black ring solution in five-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 101101 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0110260 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[23]

Pomeransky and R

A. A. Pomeransky and R. A. Sen’kov, “Black ring with two angular momenta,” [arXiv:hep-th/0612005 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[24]

New axisymmetric stationary solutions of five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations with asymptotic flatness,

T. Mishima and H. Iguchi, “New axisymmetric stationary solutions of five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations with asymptotic flatness,” Phys. Rev. D73, 044030 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0504018 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2006
[25]

A Black ring with a rotating 2-sphere,

P. Figueras, “A Black ring with a rotating 2-sphere,” JHEP07, 039 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0505244 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2005
[26]

Stationary Gravitational Solitons with Axial Symmetry,

V. A. Belinsky and V. E. Sakharov, “Stationary Gravitational Solitons with Axial Symmetry,” Sov. Phys. JETP50, 1 (1979)

1979
[27]

Vacuum solutions of five dimensional Einstein equations generated by inverse scattering method,

S. Tomizawa, Y. Morisawa and Y. Yasui, “Vacuum solutions of five dimensional Einstein equations generated by inverse scattering method,” Phys. Rev. D73, 064009 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0512252 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2006
[28]

Solitonic generation of five-dimensional black ring solution,

H. Iguchi and T. Mishima, “Solitonic generation of five-dimensional black ring solution,” Phys. Rev. D73, 121501 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0604050 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2006
[29]

Vacuum solutions of five-dimensional Einstein equations generated by inverse scattering method. II. Production of black ring solution,

S. Tomizawa and M. Nozawa, “Vacuum solutions of five-dimensional Einstein equations generated by inverse scattering method. II. Production of black ring solution,” Phys. Rev. D73, 124034 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0604067 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2006
[30]

Boundary Value Problem for Black Rings,

Y. Morisawa, S. Tomizawa and Y. Yasui, “Boundary Value Problem for Black Rings,” Phys. Rev. D77, 064019 (2008) [arXiv:0710.4600 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2008
[31]

Unbalanced Pomeransky-Sen’kov black ring,

Y. Chen, K. Hong and E. Teo, “Unbalanced Pomeransky-Sen’kov black ring,” Phys. Rev. D84, 084030 (2011) [arXiv:1108.1849 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2011
[32]

All supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five- dimensions,

J. P. Gauntlett, J. B. Gutowski, C. M. Hull, S. Pakis and H. S. Reall, “All supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five- dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav.20, 4587-4634 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0209114 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2003
[33]

Higher dimensional black holes and supersymmetry,

H. S. Reall, “Higher dimensional black holes and supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D68, 024024 (2003) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D70, 089902 (2004)] [hep-th/0211290]

work page arXiv 2003
[34]

D--branes and Spinning Black Holes

J. C. Breckenridge, R. C. Myers, A. W. Peet and C. Vafa, “D-branes and spinning black holes,” Phys. Lett. B391, 93-98 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9602065 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[35]

A Supersymmetric black ring,

H. Elvang, R. Emparan, D. Mateos and H. S. Reall, “A Supersymmetric black ring,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 211302 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0407065 [hep-th]]. 48

work page arXiv 2004
[36]

Supersymmetric Black Holes with Lens-Space Topology,

H. K. Kunduri and J. Lucietti, “Supersymmetric Black Holes with Lens-Space Topology,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, no.21, 211101 (2014) [arXiv:1408.6083 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2014
[37]

Supersymmetric black lenses in five dimensions,

S. Tomizawa and M. Nozawa, “Supersymmetric black lenses in five dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.4, 044037 (2016) [arXiv:1606.06643 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2016
[38]

Moduli space of supersymmetric solitons and black holes in five dimensions,

V. Breunh¨ older and J. Lucietti, “Moduli space of supersymmetric solitons and black holes in five dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys.365, no.2, 471-513 (2019) doi:10.1007/s00220-018-3215-8 [arXiv:1712.07092 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-018-3215-8 2019
[39]

One ring to rule them all ... and in the darkness bind them?,

I. Bena and N. P. Warner, “One ring to rule them all ... and in the darkness bind them?,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.9, no.5, 667-701 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0408106 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2005
[40]

General concentric black rings,

J. P. Gauntlett and J. B. Gutowski, “General concentric black rings,” Phys. Rev. D71, 045002 (2005) [arXiv:hep- th/0408122 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2005
[41]

Supersymmetric black rings and three-charge supertubes,

H. Elvang, R. Emparan, D. Mateos and H. S. Reall, “Supersymmetric black rings and three-charge supertubes,” Phys. Rev. D71, 024033 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0408120 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2005
[42]

General supersymmetric AdS5 black holes

J. B. Gutowski and H. S. Reall, “General supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes,” JHEP04, 048 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0401129 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2004
[43]

Black rings in Taub-NUT,

I. Bena, P. Kraus and N. P. Warner, “Black rings in Taub-NUT,” Phys. Rev. D72, 084019 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0504142 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2005
[44]

Stephani, D

H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt,Exact Solutions of Einstein ’s Field Equations, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003)

2003
[45]

New formulation of the axially symmetric gravitational field problem,

F. J. Ernst, “New formulation of the axially symmetric gravitational field problem,” Phys. Rev.167, 1175-1179 (1968)

1968
[46]

New Formulation of the Axially Symmetric Gravitational Field Problem. II,

F. J. Ernst, “New Formulation of the Axially Symmetric Gravitational Field Problem. II,” Phys. Rev.168, 1415-1417 (1968)

1968
[47]

Generating rotating fields in general relativity,

G. Clement, “Generating rotating fields in general relativity,” Grav. Cosmol.5, 281-284 (1999) [arXiv:gr-qc/9910096 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
[48]

From Schwarzschild to Kerr: Generating spinning Einstein-Maxwell fields from static fields,

G. Clement, “From Schwarzschild to Kerr: Generating spinning Einstein-Maxwell fields from static fields,” Phys. Rev. D 57, 4885-4889 (1998) [arXiv:gr-qc/9710109 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 1998
[49]

EHLERS-HARRISON TYPE TRANSFORMATIONS FOR JORDAN’S EXTENDED THEORY OF GRAV- ITATION,

D. Maison, “EHLERS-HARRISON TYPE TRANSFORMATIONS FOR JORDAN’S EXTENDED THEORY OF GRAV- ITATION,” Gen. Rel. Grav.10, 717-723 (1979)

1979
[50]

Stationary axisymmetric solutions of five dimensional gravity,

S. Giusto and A. Saxena, “Stationary axisymmetric solutions of five dimensional gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.24, 4269- 4294 (2007) [arXiv:0705.4484 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2007
[51]

More on the Similarity between D=5 Simple Supergravity and M Theory

S. Mizoguchi and N. Ohta, “More on the similarity between D = 5 simple supergravity and M theory,” Phys. Lett. B441, 123-132 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9807111 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[52]

On discrete U duality in M theory,

S. Mizoguchi and G. Schroder, “On discrete U duality in M theory,” Class. Quant. Grav.17, 835-870 (2000) [arXiv:hep- th/9909150 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2000
[53]

$G_2$ generating technique for minimal D=5 supergravity and black rings

A. Bouchareb, G. Clement, C. M. Chen, D. V. Gal’tsov, N. G. Scherbluk and T. Wolf, “G(2) generating technique for minimal D=5 supergravity and black rings,” Phys. Rev. D76, 104032 (2007) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D78, 029901 (2008)] [arXiv:0708.2361 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[54]

Suzuki and S

R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, “New construction of a charged dipole black ring by the Harrison transformation,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.8, 084020 (2024) [arXiv:2402.07589 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Suzuki and S

R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, “New black ring with all independent conserved charges in five-dimensional minimal super- gravity,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.12, 124041 (2024) [arXiv:2407.18142 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[56]

Capped black hole in five dimensions,

R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, “Capped black hole in five dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.12, L121503 (2024) [arXiv:2311.11653 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

Suzuki and S

R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, “Solution Generation of a Capped Black Hole,” [arXiv:2403.17796 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[58]

Nonuniqueness of capped black holes: Large and small bubbles,

R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, “Nonuniqueness of capped black holes: Large and small bubbles,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.6, 064066 (2025) [arXiv:2411.19082 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Generating technique for $U(1)^3 5D$ supergravity

D. V. Gal’tsov and N. G. Scherbluk, “Generating technique for U(1)**3 5D supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D78, 064033 (2008) [arXiv:0805.3924 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[60]

On the Geroch Group,

P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison, “On the Geroch Group,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.46, 215 (1987) MPI- PAE/PTh-70/86

1987
[61]

Geroch Group Description of Black Holes,

B. Chakrabarty and A. Virmani, “Geroch Group Description of Black Holes,” JHEP11, 068 (2014) [arXiv:1408.0875 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2014
[62]

Inverse Scattering and the Geroch Group,

D. Katsimpouri, A. Kleinschmidt and A. Virmani, “Inverse Scattering and the Geroch Group,” JHEP02, 011 (2013) [arXiv:1211.3044 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2013
[63]

An inverse scattering formalism for STU supergravity,

D. Katsimpouri, A. Kleinschmidt and A. Virmani, “An inverse scattering formalism for STU supergravity,” JHEP03, 101 (2014) [arXiv:1311.7018 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2014
[64]

An Inverse Scattering Construction of the JMaRT Fuzzball,

D. Katsimpouri, A. Kleinschmidt and A. Virmani, “An Inverse Scattering Construction of the JMaRT Fuzzball,” JHEP 12, 070 (2014) [arXiv:1409.6471 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2014
[65]

Description of non-spherical black holes in 5D Einstein gravity via the Riemann-Hilbert problem,

J. Sakamoto and S. Tomizawa, “Description of non-spherical black holes in 5D Einstein gravity via the Riemann-Hilbert problem,” JHEP01, 138 (2026) [arXiv:2510.02093 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2026
[66]

Monodromy-Matrix Description of Doubly Rotating Black Rings,

J. Sakamoto and S. Tomizawa, “Monodromy-Matrix Description of Doubly Rotating Black Rings,” [arXiv:2511.05353 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[67]

Non-BPS Black Rings and Black Holes in Taub-NUT,

I. Bena, G. Dall’Agata, S. Giusto, C. Ruef and N. P. Warner, “Non-BPS Black Rings and Black Holes in Taub-NUT,” JHEP06, 015 (2009) [arXiv:0902.4526 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2009
[68]

Geroch Group Description of Bubbling Geometries,

P. Roy and A. Virmani, “Geroch Group Description of Bubbling Geometries,” JHEP08, 129 (2018) [arXiv:1806.01590 49 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2018
[69]

The Rotating dyonic black holes of Kaluza-Klein theory,

D. Rasheed, “The Rotating dyonic black holes of Kaluza-Klein theory,” Nucl. Phys. B454, 379-401 (1995) [arXiv:hep- th/9505038 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1995
[70]

Rotating Kaluza-Klein black holes,

F. Larsen, “Rotating Kaluza-Klein black holes,” Nucl. Phys. B575, 211-230 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9909102 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2000
[71]

Almost BPS black holes,

K. Goldstein and S. Katmadas, “Almost BPS black holes,” JHEP05, 058 (2009) [arXiv:0812.4183 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2009
[72]

A (Running) Bolt for New Reasons,

I. Bena, S. Giusto, C. Ruef and N. P. Warner, “A (Running) Bolt for New Reasons,” JHEP11, 089 (2009) [arXiv:0909.2559 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2009
[73]

Interacting non-BPS black holes,

G. Bossard and C. Ruef, “Interacting non-BPS black holes,” Gen. Rel. Grav.44, 21-66 (2012) [arXiv:1106.5806 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2012
[74]

Bubbling supertubes and foaming black holes,

I. Bena and N. P. Warner, “Bubbling supertubes and foaming black holes,” Phys. Rev. D74, 066001 (2006) [arXiv:hep- th/0505166 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2006
[75]

Black holes, black rings and their microstates,

I. Bena and N. P. Warner, “Black holes, black rings and their microstates,” Lect. Notes Phys.755, 1-92 (2008) [arXiv:hep- th/0701216 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2008
[76]

Einstein-Maxwell gravitational instantons and five dimensional solitonic strings,

M. Dunajski and S. A. Hartnoll, “Einstein-Maxwell gravitational instantons and five dimensional solitonic strings,” Class. Quant. Grav.24, 1841-1862 (2007) [arXiv:hep-th/0610261 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2007
[77]

Cassani, A

D. Cassani, A. Ruip´ erez and E. Turetta, “Bubbling saddles of the gravitational index,” SciPost Phys.19, 134 (2025) [arXiv:2507.12650 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2025
[78]

multi-centered rotating black holes in Kaluza-Klein theory,

E. Teo and T. Wan, “multi-centered rotating black holes in Kaluza-Klein theory,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.4, 044054 (2024) [arXiv:2311.17730 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2024
[79]

Asymmetric dyonic multi-centered rotating black holes,

S. Tomizawa, J. Sakamoto and R. Suzuki, “Asymmetric dyonic multi-centered rotating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.12, 124047 (2025) [arXiv:2509.17583 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2025
[80]

Subtracted Geometry from Harrison Transformations: II,

A. Sahay and A. Virmani, “Subtracted Geometry from Harrison Transformations: II,” JHEP07, 089 (2013) [arXiv:1305.2800 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.