Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 6 cited by

Error Correction in Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics with Quantum Reference Frames

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Gauge symmetry in lattice QED encodes information that supports explicit quantum error correction through quantum reference frames.

desk verdict The paper gives concrete QRF constructions that turn gauge constraints in lattice QED into an error-correcting code for both pure-gauge and fermionic cases, but the step that resolves degenerate syndromes into unique correctable errors is the one that still needs explicit verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.06149 v1 submitted 2026-04-07 quant-ph hep-lathep-th

Elias Rothlin , Carla Ferradini , Lin-Qing Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phhep-lathep-th
keywords quantumerrorcorrectionlatticeelectrodynamicsreferenceframesgaugesymmetryAbeliantheorieserror-correctingcodesspanningtrees
checked against reality_from_one_distinctionCost.FunctionalEquation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that the apparent redundancy of gauge symmetry in lattice quantum electrodynamics can instead serve as a resource for protecting quantum information against noise. It constructs quantum reference frames from spanning trees on the lattice for the gauge sector and from the matter fields for the fermionic sector. These frames turn generically degenerate syndromes from constraint measurements into distinguishable families of errors, for which group-theoretical recovery maps can then be written down. The result gives two concrete error-correcting structures, one purely gauge and one that includes fermions, both outside the usual stabilizer-code setting. A reader would care because this suggests gauge theories carry their own built-in encoding mechanism that could be harnessed for fault-tolerant quantum simulation or computation.

What carries the argument

Quantum reference frames built from spanning trees of the lattice (for gauge fields) and from the matter field (for fermions), which select physical degrees of freedom and lift the degeneracy of constraint-syndrome measurements to permit explicit recovery.

What would settle it

An explicit computation on a small lattice showing that the proposed spanning-tree or fermionic reference frame leaves at least one pair of distinct gauge-violating errors with identical syndromes and no group-theoretical recovery map that corrects both.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For Abelian gauge groups the authors construct explicit recovery operations via group-theoretical methods once quantum reference frames resolve the degeneracy of gauge-violating error syndromes. Applied to lattice QED this produces a pure-gauge code whose logical information is encoded in the physical degrees of freedom selected by a spanning-tree reference frame, and a second code that additionally incorporates the fermionic matter field as its reference frame. The gauge symmetry thereby supplies a concrete encoding structure that supports error correction beyond stabilizer formalism.

Load-bearing premise

Quantum reference frames based on spanning trees and matter fields can resolve the generic degeneracy in syndromes of gauge-violating errors to single out families of correctable errors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Explicit group-theoretical recovery maps exist for any Abelian gauge theory once a suitable quantum reference frame is chosen.
  • Lattice QED admits at least two distinct error-correcting encodings, one using only gauge degrees of freedom and one that includes fermions.
  • Constraint measurements in gauge theories yield syndromes whose degeneracy is lifted by reference-frame information, turning them into correctable error families.
  • The same construction applies to both ideal and non-ideal reference frames, showing robustness of the encoding.
  • Gauge symmetry supplies an intrinsic encoding structure that is not limited to stabilizer codes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reference-frame technique might extend to non-Abelian gauge theories if suitable spanning-tree analogs can be defined.
  • Quantum simulators of lattice gauge theories could incorporate these encodings as a form of hardware-level error suppression.
  • The approach links gauge redundancy directly to quantum reference-frame ideas used in quantum gravity and quantum foundations, suggesting a broader information-theoretic role for gauge symmetry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that lattice quantum electrodynamics (QED) can be interpreted as a quantum error-correcting code (QECC) beyond the stabilizer formalism by constructing quantum reference frames (QRFs): a gauge-field QRF based on spanning trees of the lattice and a fermionic QRF from the matter field. These QRFs are said to resolve the generic degeneracy of syndromes arising from gauge-violating constraint measurements, thereby identifying families of correctable errors for which explicit group-theoretical recovery operations can be defined, both in the pure-gauge sector and when fermions are included.

Significance. If the explicit QRF constructions and the associated recovery maps are rigorously established, the work would offer a concrete information-theoretic role for gauge symmetry as an encoding resource in lattice gauge theories. This could inform the design of fault-tolerant protocols for quantum simulation of QED and related models, extending the gauge-stabilizer bridge from prior literature to non-stabilizer settings with explicit error families.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and gauge QRF construction section] Abstract and the section introducing the gauge-field QRF: the central assertion that spanning-tree QRFs resolve generic syndrome degeneracy to single out uniquely identifiable families of correctable errors (allowing group-theoretical recovery that preserves the code space and logical operators) is load-bearing for the QECC claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit verification that the QRF state furnishes a faithful distinguishing label, particularly for non-ideal QRFs or when the error set is not stabilizer-like.
  2. [Fermionic QRF and full lattice QED section] The fermionic QRF construction and its application to the matter-inclusive sector: the claim that the matter-field QRF similarly resolves degeneracies for gauge-violating errors including fermions requires an explicit demonstration that the resulting recovery operators map errored states back into the gauge-invariant subspace without disturbing logical information; this step is not shown to hold when the QRF is non-ideal or when fermionic statistics affect the constraint measurements.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation distinguishing ideal versus non-ideal QRF states and the precise definition of the error families could be clarified with additional diagrams or a summary table.
  2. A brief comparison table relating the new QRF-based recovery to standard stabilizer recovery in lattice gauge theories would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting these important points regarding the rigor of the QRF constructions. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the explicit verifications while preserving the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and gauge QRF construction section] Abstract and the section introducing the gauge-field QRF: the central assertion that spanning-tree QRFs resolve generic syndrome degeneracy to single out uniquely identifiable families of correctable errors (allowing group-theoretical recovery that preserves the code space and logical operators) is load-bearing for the QECC claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit verification that the QRF state furnishes a faithful distinguishing label, particularly for non-ideal QRFs or when the error set is not stabilizer-like.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the distinguishing power of the spanning-tree QRF state would strengthen the presentation. The manuscript constructs the gauge QRF via spanning trees in the relevant section and uses group representation theory to define the recovery maps for the identified error families. To address the referee's concern, we will add an explicit calculation (including a small-lattice example) showing that the QRF state provides a faithful label for both ideal and non-ideal cases within the considered error sets, confirming that the group-theoretical recovery preserves the code space and logical operators. We will also clarify the abstract accordingly. This is a partial revision as the foundational construction is present but requires this additional verification step. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Fermionic QRF and full lattice QED section] The fermionic QRF construction and its application to the matter-inclusive sector: the claim that the matter-field QRF similarly resolves degeneracies for gauge-violating errors including fermions requires an explicit demonstration that the resulting recovery operators map errored states back into the gauge-invariant subspace without disturbing logical information; this step is not shown to hold when the QRF is non-ideal or when fermionic statistics affect the constraint measurements.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this comment. The fermionic QRF is constructed from the matter fields, and the recovery operators are defined to act consistently with the gauge constraints. In the revised manuscript we will include an explicit demonstration that these operators map states back to the gauge-invariant subspace while leaving logical information invariant. This will cover the effect of fermionic statistics on the constraint measurements (by showing that the anticommutation relations are preserved under the QRF-based recovery) and will extend the analysis to non-ideal QRFs in parallel with the gauge-sector treatment. We view this as a necessary clarification and will expand the relevant section accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; new lattice QRF constructions are independent of prior inputs

full rationale

The derivation introduces explicit new elements—spanning-tree gauge QRFs and matter-field QRFs—applied to lattice QED, with group-theoretical recovery maps for both ideal and non-ideal cases. While the abstract references earlier works establishing the general gauge-QRF-stabilizer bridge, the central claims (resolution of degenerate syndromes into correctable families and explicit QECC structures) rest on these fresh constructions rather than redefining inputs or fitting parameters. No equation or step reduces by construction to a prior result or self-citation; the work remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that gauge symmetry functions as an information-encoding resource and that QRFs can be constructed to resolve error degeneracy; no free parameters or new invented entities with external evidence are introduced beyond the QRF constructions themselves.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption For Abelian gauge groups, group-theoretical methods suffice to construct explicit recovery operations for error sets determined by QRFs.
    Invoked in the abstract to establish recovery for ideal and non-ideal cases.
  • domain assumption Quantum reference frames resolve the degeneracy of syndromes associated with gauge-violating errors.
    Key premise allowing identification of correctable error families.
invented entities (2)
  • Gauge-field quantum reference frame based on spanning trees of the lattice
    purpose: To encode physical information in the pure-gauge sector and enable error correction
    New construction applied to lattice QED in the paper.
  • Fermionic field quantum reference frame from the matter field
    purpose: To extend the QECC structure to include fermions
    Constructed to handle the matter-inclusive sector.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Error Correction in Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics with Quantum Reference Frames." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.06149

@misc{pith2026260406149,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Error Correction in Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics with Quantum Reference Frames},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.06149}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.06149}
}
read the original abstract

Is gauge symmetry merely a redundancy in our description, or does it carry a deeper information-theoretic significance? Quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) show that redundancy can serve as a resource for protecting information against noise. In this work, we ask whether gauge theories can be understood in similar terms, and make this idea concrete in lattice quantum electrodynamics (QED), building on and extending earlier works that established a bridge between gauge systems, stabilizer codes, and quantum reference frames (QRFs). For Abelian gauge groups, we show that explicit recovery operations can be constructed using group-theoretical methods for error sets determined by both ideal and non-ideal QRFs. Applied to lattice QED, this yields two QECC structures: one in the pure-gauge sector and one including fermions. We construct a gauge-field QRF based on spanning trees of the lattice and a fermionic field QRF from the matter field, thereby making explicit how physical information is encoded. While the syndromes of gauge-violating errors associated with constraint measurements are generically degenerate, QRFs resolve this degeneracy and single out families of correctable errors. This establishes lattice QED as a QECC beyond the stabilizer setting and shows concretely how gauge symmetry provides an encoding structure that supports error correction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06149 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Under the gauge symmetry, Hkin decomposes into a direct sum of charge sectors Hq, where Hphys corresponds to the trivial representation. (1) An error E maps a physical state |ψ⟩ ∈ Hphys to the error state E|ψ⟩ which may have support spread across every charge sector. (2) A measurement collapses the state to one of the charge sectors, ΠqE|ψ⟩ ∈ Hq, and (3) applying an operator A † q recovers the original state if A † … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The electric flux on the lattice (here represented in 2 dimensions, with links oriented upwards/to the right) is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An error U m l acting on the strong-coupling ground state creates m units of electric flux on l = [v, v′ ] (middle, oriented upwards). A measurement of the constraints results in Cv = m and Cv′ = −m (marked in red) and 0 elsewhere, and the error is corrected with (U m l ) † . 5.3 Lattice QED with Fermionic Matter as a QECC Including staggered fermions into the model, the kinematical space contains both quantum rotor… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The fermionic field QRF lives on the sites of the lattice (marked in blue). We assume that the top left site is even. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: To illustrate Theorem 5.4, we consider two different errors. (Top) A gauge-violating error excites the strong￾coupling vacuum to |0⟩v|0⟩l|0⟩v′ ⊗ |ϕ⟩rest, where we take v to be an even site. Now, a coarse-grained measurement yields rv′ = 1 and 0 elsewhere, and the error…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Physical states correspond to a coherent average over the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: On the sites v, v ′ , the matter field operators have a phase degree of freedom (red arrow), which we picture to be indicated with respect to a reference frame (green arrow). The angle θl of the link l measures the relative angle between the reference frames on v and v…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: In an infinite lattice, we can split the tree into subtrees by cutting all links attached to a vertex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We construct a gauge-field QRF based on spanning trees... syndromes of gauge-violating errors... QRFs resolve this degeneracy... explicit recovery operations... group-theoretical methods

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Theorem 3.1 (Correctable gauge-fixing operators)... Knill-Laflamme... Proposition 3.3... charge measurements... A_q = 1/√|G| ∫ χ_q(g) P_g^R

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum reference frames beyond subsystems: a reconstruction and generalization of the perspective-neutral framework

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5 of 10

    Quantum reference frames need not be subsystems: covariant instruments suffice, recovering the perspective-neutral framework operationally and enabling labeling frames and exact interacting relational clocks.

  2. Frame-Dependent Traces and the Third-Particle Paradox

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The Third-Particle Paradox is not a contradiction: the authors characterize exactly which states allow consistent subsystem discarding in the perspective-neutral and quantum-information approaches.

  3. Binary Gauss Stabilizers for Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Binary Gauss stabilizers provide a non-Pauli stabilizer description of the physical subspace of Z_{2^η} lattice gauge theories, enabling bit-flip error correction and gauge fixing from gauge constraints alone.

  4. Quantum Reference Fields Transformations in Linearized Quantum Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Extends quantum reference frames to quantum reference fields in linearized quantum gravity and derives unitary maps implementing relational gauge-invariant observables between quantum perspectives.

  5. Arbitrary-Distance Quantum Error Correction with Gauss's Law for $\mathbb Z_2$ Lattice Gauge Theory

    hep-lat 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gauss's law constraints in Z2 lattice gauge theory can be made into quantum error-correcting codes of arbitrary distance, with provably optimal encoding rate within the constructed family.

  6. The Paradox of the Third Particle is classical

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Even without quantum superpositions, changing the reference particle can make information that was locally readable from one perspective non-locally readable from another once a third particle is included.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Dirac.Lectures on Quantum Mechanics

    P. Dirac.Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. Belfer Graduate School of Science. Monographs series. Belfer Graduate School of Science, Yeshiva University, 1964

    work page 1964

  2. [2]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim.Quantization of Gauge Systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.isbn: 9780691213866.doi:10.1515/9780691213866

    work page doi:10.1515/9780691213866 2020

  3. [4]

    doi:10.22331/q-2020-01-27-225 , url =

    A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. Höhn, F. Giacomini, and E. Castro-Ruiz. “A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework”. In:Quantum4 (2020), p. 225.doi: 10.22331/q-2020-01-27-225

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2020-01-27-225 2020

  4. [5]

    Perspective-neutral approach to quantum frame covariance for general symmetry groups

    A.-C. de la Hamette, T. D. Galley, P. A. Höhn, L. Loveridge, and M. P. Mueller. “Perspective-neutral approach to quantum frame covariance for general symmetry groups”. In:arXiv:2110.13824 [quant- ph](2021).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2110.13824

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.13824 2021

  5. [6]

    Quantum reference frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the third particle

    M. Krumm, P. A. Höhn, and M. P. Müller. “Quantum reference frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the third particle”. In:Quantum5 (2021), p. 530.doi:10.22331/q-2021-08- 27-530. 41

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2021-08- 2021

  6. [7]

    Internal quantum reference frames for finite Abelian groups,

    P. A. Höhn, M. Krumm, and M. P. Müller. “Internal quantum reference frames for finite Abelian groups”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics63.11 (2022).doi:10.1063/5.0088485

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0088485 2022

  7. [8]

    Here, we present small technical details for the com- putation of the scattering integral (99) att→−∞

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens. “Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information”. In:Reviews of Modern Physics79.2 (2007), pp. 555–609.doi:10.1103/revmodphys. 79.555

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2007

  8. [9]

    Phase transition of computational power in the resource states for one-way quantum computation

    G. Gour and R. W. Spekkens. “The resource theory of quantum reference frames: manipulations and monotones”. In:New Journal of Physics10.3 (2008), p. 033023.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/ 3/033023

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/ 2008

Show all 106 references
  1. [10]

    Measuring the quality of a quantum reference frame: The relative entropy of frameness

    G. Gour, I. Marvian, and R. W. Spekkens. “Measuring the quality of a quantum reference frame: The relative entropy of frameness”. In:Physical Review A80.1 (2009).doi:10.1103/physreva.80. 012307

    2009 doi

  2. [11]

    Relative subsystems and quantum reference frame transforma- tions

    E. Castro-Ruiz and O. Oreshkov. “Relative subsystems and quantum reference frame transforma- tions”. In:Commun. Phys.8.1 (2025), p. 187.doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02036-x

    2025 doi

  3. [12]

    Approximating relational observables by absolute quan- tities: a quantum accuracy-size trade-off

    T. Miyadera, L. Loveridge, and P. Busch. “Approximating relational observables by absolute quan- tities: a quantum accuracy-size trade-off”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 49.18 (2016), p. 185301.doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/18/185301

    2016 doi

  4. [13]

    Symmetry, Reference Frames, and Relational Quantities in Quantum Mechanics

    L. Loveridge, T. Miyadera, and P. Busch. “Symmetry, Reference Frames, and Relational Quantities in Quantum Mechanics”. In:Foundations of Physics48.2 (2018), pp. 135–198.doi:10.1007/s10701- 018-0138-3

    2018 doi

  5. [14]

    Real-space RG, error correction and Petz map

    K. Furuya, N. Lashkari, and S. Ouseph. “Real-space RG, error correction and Petz map”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2022.1 (2022).doi:10.1007/jhep01(2022)170

    2022 doi

  6. [15]

    Renormalization group and approximate error correction

    K. Furuya, N. Lashkari, and M. Moosa. “Renormalization group and approximate error correction”. In:Physical Review D106.10 (2022).doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.105007

    2022 doi

  7. [16]

    Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow. “Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics2015.4 (2015).doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)163

    2015 doi

  8. [17]

    Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow, and J. Preskill. “Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2015.6 (2015). doi:10.1007/jhep06(2015)149

    2015 doi

  9. [18]

    Code Properties from Holographic Geometries

    F. Pastawski and J. Preskill. “Code Properties from Holographic Geometries”. In:Phys. Rev. X7 (2017), p. 021022.doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021022

    2017 doi

  10. [19]

    The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction

    D. Harlow. “The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics354.3 (2017), 865–912.doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2904-z

    2017 doi

  11. [20]

    Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review

    T. Kibe, P. Mandayam, and A. Mukhopadhyay. “Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review”. In:The European Physical Journal C82.5 (2022), p. 463.doi:10. 1140/epjc/s10052-022-10382-1

    2022

  12. [21]

    Superselection Rules, Quantum Er- ror Correction, and Quantum Chromodynamics

    N. Bao, C. Cao, A. Chatwin-Davies, G. Cheng, and G. Zhu. “Superselection Rules, Quantum Er- ror Correction, and Quantum Chromodynamics”. In:arXiv:2306.17230 [quant-ph](2023).doi:10. 48550/arXiv.2306.17230

    2023

  13. [22]

    Rothlin.Bridging Quantum Error Correction, Gauge Theories and Quantum Reference Frames

    E. Rothlin.Bridging Quantum Error Correction, Gauge Theories and Quantum Reference Frames. en. Student Paper. Zurich, 2024.doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000708367. 42

    2024 doi

  14. [23]

    A correspondence between quantum error correcting codes and quantum reference frames

    S. Carrozza, A. Chatwin-Davies, P. A. Höhn, and F. M. Mele. “A correspondence between quantum error correcting codes and quantum reference frames”. In:arXiv:2412.15317 [quant-ph](2024).doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.15317

    2024 doi

  15. [24]

    Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction

    D. Gottesman. “Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction”. In:arXiv:quant-ph/9705052(1997). doi:10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9705052

    1997 doi

  16. [25]

    Oracles for Gauss’s law on digital quantum computers

    J. R. Stryker. “Oracles for Gauss’s law on digital quantum computers”. In:Phys. Rev. A99 (2019), p. 042301.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.042301

    2019 doi

  17. [26]

    Quantum error correction with gauge symmetries

    A. Rajput, A. Roggero, and N. Wiebe. “Quantum error correction with gauge symmetries”. In:npj Quantum Information9.1 (2023), p. 41.doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00706-8

    2023 doi

  18. [27]

    Fault-tolerant simulation of Lattice Gauge Theories with gauge covariant codes

    L. Spagnoli, A. Roggero, and N. Wiebe. “Fault-tolerant simulation of Lattice Gauge Theories with gauge covariant codes”. In:Quantum10 (2026), p. 1968.doi:10.22331/q-2026-01-16-1968

    2026 doi

  19. [28]

    Quantum error thresholds for gauge-redundant digitiza- tions of lattice field theories

    M. Carena, H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, and W. Liu. “Quantum error thresholds for gauge-redundant digitiza- tions of lattice field theories”. In:arXiv:2402.16780 [hep-lat](2024).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2402. 16780

    2024 doi

  20. [29]

    Robustness of Gauge Digitization to Quantum Noise

    E. J. Gustafson and H. Lamm. “Robustness of Gauge Digitization to Quantum Noise”. In: arXiv:2301.10207 [hep-lat](2023).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2301.10207

    2023 doi

  21. [30]

    Quantum Error Correction Codes for Truncated SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theories

    X. Yao. “Quantum Error Correction Codes for Truncated SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theories”. In: arXiv:2511.13721 [quant-ph](2025).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.13721

    2025 doi

  22. [31]

    Trade-offs in Gauss’s law error correction for lattice gauge theory quantum simulations

    B. Pato and N. Klco. “Trade-offs in Gauss’s law error correction for lattice gauge theory quantum simulations”. In:arXiv:2602.22121 [quant-ph](2026).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.22121

    2026 doi

  23. [32]

    Spagnoli, A

    L. Spagnoli, A. Roggero, and N. Wiebe.Qudit stabiliser codes forZ N lattice gauge theories with matter. 2026.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.20661

    2026 doi

  24. [33]

    Exploring the Connection between Gauge Theory and Quantum Error Correction via Quantum Reference Frames

    E. Rothlin. “Exploring the Connection between Gauge Theory and Quantum Error Correction via Quantum Reference Frames”. Master’s thesis. ETH Zurich, July 18, 2025.doi:10.3929/ethz-c- 000784853

    2025 doi

  25. [34]

    Gauss law codes and vacuum codes from lattice gauge theories

    J. P. Lacambra, A. Chatwin-Davies, M. Honda, and P. Höhn. “Gauss law codes and vacuum codes from lattice gauge theories”.Forthcoming

  26. [35]

    Trinity of relational quantum dynamics

    P. A. Höhn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock. “Trinity of relational quantum dynamics”. In:Phys. Rev. D104 (2021), p. 066001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.066001

    2021 doi

  27. [36]

    Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories

    J. Kogut and L. Susskind. “Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories”. In:Phys. Rev. D11 (1975), pp. 395–408.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.395

    1975 doi

  28. [38]

    Gattringer and C

    C. Gattringer and C. B. Lang.Quantum chromodynamics on the lattice. Vol. 788. Berlin: Springer, 2010.isbn: 978-3-642-01849-7, 978-3-642-01850-3.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3

    2010 doi

  29. [39]

    Contour Gauge: Compendium of Results in Theory and Applications

    I. V. Anikin. “Contour Gauge: Compendium of Results in Theory and Applications”. In:Physics of Particles and Nuclei56.1 (2025), pp. 12–42.doi:10.1134/S106377962470120X

    2025 doi

  30. [40]

    Charge Superselection Rule

    Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind. “Charge Superselection Rule”. In:Phys. Rev.155 (1967), pp. 1428–1431. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.155.1428. 43

    1967 doi

  31. [41]

    Observability of the Sign Change of Spinors under2πRotations

    Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind. “Observability of the Sign Change of Spinors under2πRotations”. In:Phys. Rev.158 (1967), pp. 1237–1238.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.158.1237

    1967 doi

  32. [42]

    Quantum frames of reference

    Y. Aharonov and T. Kaufherr. “Quantum frames of reference”. In:Phys. Rev. D30 (1984), pp. 368– 385.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.368

    1984 doi

  33. [43]

    Operational Quantum Reference Frame Transforma- tions

    T. Carette, J. Glowacki, and L. Loveridge. “Operational Quantum Reference Frame Transforma- tions”. In:Quantum9 (2025), p. 1680.doi:10.22331/q-2025-03-27-1680

    2025 doi

  34. [44]

    Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner. “Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames”. In:Nature Communications10.1 (2019), p. 494.doi:10.1038/ s41467-018-08155-0

    2019

  35. [45]

    Quantum reference frames for general symmetry groups

    A.-C. de la Hamette and T. D. Galley. “Quantum reference frames for general symmetry groups”. In:Quantum4 (2020), p. 367.doi:10.22331/q-2020-11-30-367

    2020 doi

  36. [46]

    The Perspectives of Non-Ideal Quantum Reference Frames

    S. C. Garmier, L. Hausmann, and E. Castro-Ruiz. “The Perspectives of Non-Ideal Quantum Reference Frames”. In:arXiv:2512.19343 [quant-ph](2025).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.19343

    2025 doi

  37. [47]

    On the relation between perspective-neutral, algebraic, and effective quantum reference frames

    J. De Vuyst, P. A. Hoehn, and A. Tsobanjan. “On the relation between perspective-neutral, algebraic, and effective quantum reference frames”. In:arXiv:2507.14131 [quant-ph](2025).doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2507.14131

    2025

  38. [49]

    Accessibility of Global Properties from Internal Quantum Reference Frame Perspectives

    A.-C. de la Hamette, V. Kabel, and Časlav Brukner. “Accessibility of Global Properties from Internal Quantum Reference Frame Perspectives”. In:arXiv:2510.09100 [quant-ph](2026).doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2510.09100

    2026

  39. [50]

    What can we do in a symmetry-constrained perspective? The im- portance of the total charge’s status in quantum reference frame frameworks

    G. Doat and A. Vanrietvelde. “What can we do in a symmetry-constrained perspective? The im- portance of the total charge’s status in quantum reference frame frameworks”. In:arXiv:2510.13607 [quant-ph](2025).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.13607

    2025 doi

  40. [51]

    Superselection rules and quantum protocols

    A. Kitaev, D. Mayers, and J. Preskill. “Superselection rules and quantum protocols”. In:Physical Review A69.5 (2004).doi:10.1103/physreva.69.052326

    2004 doi

  41. [52]

    Degradation of a quantum reference frame

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, R. W. Spekkens, and P. S. Turner. “Degradation of a quantum reference frame”. In:New Journal of Physics8.4 (2006), pp. 58–58.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/8/4/058

    2006 doi

  42. [53]

    Changing quantum reference frames

    M. C. Palmer, F. Girelli, and S. D. Bartlett. “Changing quantum reference frames”. In:Physical Review A89.5 (2014).doi:10.1103/physreva.89.052121

    2014 doi

  43. [54]

    Uncertainty relations relative to phase-space quantum refer- ence frames

    M. Jorquera Riera and L. Loveridge. “Uncertainty relations relative to phase-space quantum refer- ence frames”. In:Phys. Rev. A111 (2025), p. L060201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.111.L060201

    2025 doi

  44. [56]

    Relational entanglement entropies and quantum reference frames in gauge theories

    G. Araujo-Regado, P. A. Höhn, and F. Sartini. “Relational entanglement entropies and quantum reference frames in gauge theories”. In:arXiv:2506.23459 [hep-th](2025).doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2506.23459

    2025 doi

  45. [57]

    Einstein’s Equivalence principle for superpositions of gravitational fields and quantum reference frames

    F. Giacomini and Č. Brukner. “Einstein’s Equivalence principle for superpositions of gravitational fields and quantum reference frames”. In:arXiv:2012.13754 [quant-ph](2020).doi:10 . 48550 / arXiv.2012.13754. 44

    2012

  46. [58]

    Quantum reference frames for an indefinite metric

    A.-C. de la Hamette, V. Kabel, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner. “Quantum reference frames for an indefinite metric”. In:Commun. Phys.6.1 (2023), p. 231.doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01344-4

    2023 doi

  47. [59]

    Quantum reference frames at the boundary of spacetime

    V. Kabel, Č. Brukner, and W. Wieland. “Quantum reference frames at the boundary of spacetime”. In:Physical Review D108.10 (2023).doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.106022

    2023 doi

  48. [60]

    Quantum coordinates, localisation of events, and the quantum hole argument

    V. Kabel, A.-C. de la Hamette, L. Apadula, C. Cepollaro, H. Gomes, J. Butterfield, and Č. Brukner. “Quantum coordinates, localisation of events, and the quantum hole argument”. In:Commun. Phys. 8.1 (2025), p. 185.doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02084-3

    2025 doi

  49. [61]

    Localization and anomalous reference frames in gravity

    L. Freidel and J. Kirklin. “Localization and anomalous reference frames in gravity”. In: arXiv:2510.26589 [hep-th](2025).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.26589

    2025 doi arXiv

  50. [62]

    Sum of Entanglement and Subsystem Coherence Is Invariant under Quantum Reference Frame Transformations

    C. Cepollaro, A. Akil, P. Cieśliński, A.-C. de la Hamette, and v. Brukner. “Sum of Entanglement and Subsystem Coherence Is Invariant under Quantum Reference Frame Transformations”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025), p. 010201.doi:10.1103/h6b3-y4vt

    2025 doi

  51. [63]

    Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Höhn, and J. Kirklin. “Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics07 (2025), p. 146.doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)146

    2025 doi

  52. [64]

    Observer-Dependent Entropy and Diagonal Rényi Invariants in Quantum Reference Frames

    A.-C. de la Hamette. “Observer-Dependent Entropy and Diagonal Rényi Invariants in Quantum Reference Frames”. In:arXiv:2603.23598 [quant-ph](2026).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.23598

    2026 doi

  53. [65]

    Quantum Relativity of Subsys- tems

    S. Ali Ahmad, T. D. Galley, P. A. Höhn, M. P. Lock, and A. R. Smith. “Quantum Relativity of Subsys- tems”. In:Physical Review Letters128.17 (2022).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.170401

    2022 doi

  54. [66]

    Quantum Frame Relativity of Subsystems, Correlations and Thermodynamics

    P. A. Höhn, I. Kotecha, and F. M. Mele. “Quantum Frame Relativity of Subsystems, Correlations and Thermodynamics”. In:arXiv:2308.09131 [quant-ph](2023).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2308.09131

    2023 doi

  55. [67]

    Quantum clocks and the temporal localisability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems

    E. Castro-Ruiz, F. Giacomini, A. Belenchia, and Č. Brukner. “Quantum clocks and the temporal localisability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems”. In:Nature Commun.11.1 (2020), p. 2672.doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16013-1

    2020 doi

  56. [68]

    Events and their Localisation are Relative to a Lab

    V. Vilasini, L.-Q. Chen, L. Ye, and R. Renner. “Events and their Localisation are Relative to a Lab”. In:arXiv:2505.21797 [quant-ph](2025).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.21797

    2025 doi

  57. [69]

    An algebra of observables for de Sitter space

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten. “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics02 (2023), p. 082.doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)082

    2023 doi

  58. [70]

    Quantum Reference Frames, Measurement Schemes and the Type of Local Algebras in Quantum Field Theory

    C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, L. D. Loveridge, K. Rejzner, and J. Waldron. “Quantum Reference Frames, Measurement Schemes and the Type of Local Algebras in Quantum Field Theory”. In:Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics406.1 (2024).doi:10.1007/s00220-024-05180-7

    2024 doi

  59. [71]

    Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Höhn, and J. Kirklin. “Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics(2025). doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)063

    2025 doi

  60. [72]

    Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables

    D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters. “Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables”. In:Phys. Rev. D27 (1983), pp. 2885–2892.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2885

    1983 doi

  61. [73]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2012.isbn: 978-0-521-63503-5.doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667

    2012 doi

  62. [74]

    Preskill.Lecture Notes: Quantum Computation, Chapter 7

    J. Preskill.Lecture Notes: Quantum Computation, Chapter 7. 1999

    1999

  63. [75]

    Theory of quantum error-correcting codes

    E. Knill and R. Laflamme. “Theory of quantum error-correcting codes”. In:Phys. Rev. A55 (1997), pp. 900–911.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.55.900. 45

    1997 doi

  64. [76]

    Theory of Quantum Error Correction for General Noise

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and L. Viola. “Theory of Quantum Error Correction for General Noise”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000), pp. 2525–2528.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2525

    2000 doi

  65. [77]

    Generalization of Quantum Error Correction via the Heisen- berg Picture

    C. Bény, A. Kempf, and D. W. Kribs. “Generalization of Quantum Error Correction via the Heisen- berg Picture”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.98 (2007), p. 100502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.100502

    2007 doi

  66. [78]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris.Representation Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York: Springer, 2004.doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9

    2004 doi

  67. [79]

    An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems

    J. B. Kogut. “An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems”. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.51 (1979), pp. 659–713.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.659

    1979 doi

  68. [80]

    Lattice fermions

    L. Susskind. “Lattice fermions”. In:Phys. Rev. D16 (1977), pp. 3031–3039.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 16.3031

    1977 doi

  69. [81]

    Lattice fermions: Species doubling, chiral invariance and the triangle anomaly

    L. H. Karsten and J. Smith. “Lattice fermions: Species doubling, chiral invariance and the triangle anomaly”. In:Nuclear Physics B183.1 (1981), pp. 103–140.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90549- 6

    1981 doi

  70. [82]

    Symmetries and Anomalies of Hamiltonian Staggered Fermions

    S. Catterall, A. Pradhan, and A. Samlodia. “Symmetries and Anomalies of Hamiltonian Staggered Fermions”. In:arXiv:2501.10862 [hep-lat](2025).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.10862

    2025 doi

  71. [83]

    Gauge fixing, the transfer matrix, and confinement on a lattice

    M. Creutz. “Gauge fixing, the transfer matrix, and confinement on a lattice”. In:Phys. Rev. D15 (1977), pp. 1128–1136.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1128

    1977 doi

  72. [84]

    Toward a Many-Body Treatment of Hamiltonian Lattice SU(N) Gauge Theory

    N. Ligterink, N. Walet, and R. Bishop. “Toward a Many-Body Treatment of Hamiltonian Lattice SU(N) Gauge Theory”. In:Annals of Physics284.2 (2000), pp. 215–262.doi:10.1006/aphy.2000. 6070

    2000 doi

  73. [85]

    A new basis for Hamiltonian SU(2) simulations

    C. W. Bauer, I. D’Andrea, M. Freytsis, and D. M. Grabowska. “A new basis for Hamiltonian SU(2) simulations”. In:arXiv:2307.11829 [hep-ph](2023).doi:10.48550/arXiv.2307.11829

    2023 doi

  74. [86]

    Almost gauge-invariant states and the ground state of Yang-Mills theory

    A. Mariani. “Almost gauge-invariant states and the ground state of Yang-Mills theory”. In:Phys. Rev. D109 (2024), p. 094508.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094508

    2024 doi

  75. [87]

    Quantum Yang-Mills theory: An overview of a program

    A. Milsted and T. J. Osborne. “Quantum Yang-Mills theory: An overview of a program”. In:Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), p. 014505.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.014505

    2018 doi

  76. [88]

    Pachner moves in a 4d Riemannian holomor- phic Spin Foam model

    A. Banburski, L.-Q. Chen, L. Freidel, and J. Hnybida. “Pachner moves in a 4d Riemannian holomor- phic Spin Foam model”. In:Phys. Rev. D92.12 (2015), p. 124014.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92. 124014

    2015 doi

  77. [89]

    Homological Quantum Rotor Codes: Logical Qubits from Torsion

    C. Vuillot, A. Ciani, and B. M. Terhal. “Homological Quantum Rotor Codes: Logical Qubits from Torsion”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics405.2 (2024).doi:10.1007/s00220-023- 04905-4

    2024 doi

  78. [90]

    Algebraic Quantum Field Theory – an introduction

    C. J. Fewster and K. Rejzner. “Algebraic Quantum Field Theory – an introduction”. In: arXiv:1904.04051 [hep-th](2019).doi:10.48550/arXiv.1904.04051

    1904 doi

  79. [91]

    Hatfield.Quantum field theory of point particles and strings

    B. Hatfield.Quantum field theory of point particles and strings. CRC Press, 1992

    1992

  80. [92]

    Weinberg.The Quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg.The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 2005. isbn: 978-0-521-67053-1, 978-0-511-25204-4.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139644167

    2005 doi

  81. [93]

    The split property for quantum field theories in flat and curved spacetimes

    C. J. Fewster. “The split property for quantum field theories in flat and curved spacetimes”. In: arXiv:1601.06936 [math-ph](2016).doi:10.48550/arXiv.1601.06936. 46

    2016 doi

  82. [94]

    Standard and split inclusions of von Neumann algebras

    S. Doplicher and R. Longo. “Standard and split inclusions of von Neumann algebras”. In:Invent. Math.75 (1984), pp. 493–536.doi:10.1007/BF01388641

    1984 doi

  83. [95]

    Haag.Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras

    R. Haag.Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras. 1992

    1992

  84. [96]

    On the Modular Structure of Local Algebras of Observables

    K. Fredenhagen. “On the Modular Structure of Local Algebras of Observables”. In:Commun. Math. Phys.97 (1985), p. 79.doi:10.1007/BF01206179

    1985 doi

  85. [97]

    Quantum fields and local measurements

    C. J. Fewster and R. Verch. “Quantum fields and local measurements”. In:Commun. Math. Phys. 378.2 (2020), pp. 851–889.doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03800-6

    2020 doi

  86. [98]

    Towards scalable bosonic quantum error correction

    B. M. Terhal, J Conrad, and C Vuillot. “Towards scalable bosonic quantum error correction”. In: Quantum Science and Technology5.4 (2020), p. 043001.doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab98a5

    2020 doi

  87. [99]

    Encoding a qubit in an oscillator

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill. “Encoding a qubit in an oscillator”. In:Phys. Rev. A64 (2001), p. 012310.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012310

    2001 doi

  88. [100]

    Robust Encoding of a Qubit in a Molecule

    V. V. Albert, J. P. Covey, and J. Preskill. “Robust Encoding of a Qubit in a Molecule”. In:Phys. Rev. X 10 (2020), p. 031050.doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031050

    2020 doi

  89. [101]

    Encoding many qubits in a rotor

    P. Raynal, A. Kalev, J. Suzuki, and B.-G. Englert. “Encoding many qubits in a rotor”. In:Phys. Rev. A 81 (2010), p. 052327.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.052327

    2010 doi

  90. [102]

    Continuous Symmetries and Approximate Quantum Error Correction

    P. Faist, S. Nezami, V. V. Albert, G. Salton, F. Pastawski, P. Hayden, and J. Preskill. “Continuous Symmetries and Approximate Quantum Error Correction”. In:Phys. Rev. X10 (2020), p. 041018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041018

    2020 doi

  91. [103]

    Error Correction of Quantum Reference Frame Information

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, S. Popescu, and G. Salton. “Error Correction of Quantum Reference Frame Information”. In:PRX Quantum2 (2021), p. 010326.doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010326

    2021 doi

  92. [104]

    Good quantum error-correcting codes exist

    A. R. Calderbank and P. W. Shor. “Good quantum error-correcting codes exist”. In:Physical Review A54.2 (1996), 1098–1105.doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098

    1996 doi

  93. [105]

    Multiple-particle interference and quantum error correction

    A. Steane. “Multiple-particle interference and quantum error correction”. In:Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences452.1954 (1996), pp. 2551–2577.doi:10. 1098/rspa.1996.0136

    1954

  94. [106]

    General phase spaces: from discrete variables to rotor and continuum limits

    V. V. Albert, S. Pascazio, and M. H. Devoret. “General phase spaces: from discrete variables to rotor and continuum limits”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50.50 (2017), p. 504002. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa9314

    2017 doi

  95. [107]

    Quantum error correction on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces

    C. Bény, A. Kempf, and D. W. Kribs. “Quantum error correction on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics50.6 (2009), p. 062108.doi:10.1063/1.3155783. 47 A Details on Perspective-Neutral Quantum Reference Frames Perspective-neutral QRFs.For comp...

    2009 doi

  96. [108]

    mediates

    formulated the following necessary and sufficient conditions for error correction. Theorem B.2(Knill-Laflamme conditions).For a given a noise channelNwith Kraus operators E={E i}i, i.e.,N(ρ) = P i EiρE† i forρ∈S(H physical), there exists a recovery channelRif and only if Πcode...

  97. [109]

    There exists a set of constraints{C Vl |l∈R}such thatC Vl,R =−ϵ l through which we can uniquely parametrize gauge transformations byλ={λ l}l∈R, G′(λ) := Y l∈R eiλlCVl , G ′ R(λ) = O l∈R Xl(λl).(68)

  98. [110]

    Proof.The first property is clear by definition

    The orientation states|ϕ(λ)⟩ R =G ′ R(λ) N l∈R |ei(θ=0)⟩l provide a formal orthonormal basis ofH R which transforms covariantly under gauge transformations, G′ R(η)|ϕ(λ)⟩R =|ϕ(λ+η)⟩ R,⟨ϕ(η)|ϕ(λ)⟩ R = Y l∈R δ(ηl −λ l),(69) makingRan ideal QRF. Proof.The first property is clear ...

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.