pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06315 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Dark Matter on a Slide

Hsin-Chia Cheng , Xu-Hui Jiang , Lingfeng Li , Ennio Salvioni
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords dark matterdark pionsconfining dark sectorthermal relic densityLHC signalslong-lived particleshidden valleyportal interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

GeV-scale thermal dark matter achieves the observed relic density through up-scatterings of dark pions to heavier mesons followed by dark-eta decays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper describes a thermal production mechanism for dark matter made of stable dark pions that arise from a confining force in a hidden sector. The correct abundance comes from dark pions scattering upward into heavier dark kaons and etas, after which the unstable dark eta decays into visible particles and releases energy, analogous to climbing a slide and sliding back down. The observed density results when mass splittings among the dark mesons are 10 to 50 percent and the dark eta lives less than about 1000 meters in its rest frame. Direct and indirect detection are ineffective because of an exact charge conjugation symmetry, leaving collider production of dark showers containing long-lived dark etas as the main test. Several standard portal interactions above the weak scale can connect the dark sector to the Standard Model and determine the visible decay modes.

Core claim

In a minimal SU(3)/SO(3) coset model with a U(1) flavor symmetry that stabilizes the dark pions, the thermal relic density is set by the interplay of up-scatterings of dark pions into heavier dark mesons and subsequent decays of the unstable dark eta into Standard Model particles. This slide-like process reproduces the observed abundance for dark meson mass splittings of 10% to 50% and dark-eta lifetimes shorter than 10^3 m/c. The dominant experimental signals appear at the LHC as dark showers containing long-lived dark etas that decay visibly, with the signatures depending on the chosen portal.

What carries the argument

The slide mechanism, in which stable dark pions up-scatter to heavier dark mesons before the dark eta decays to visible states, that sets the relic density.

If this is right

  • The observed relic density is reproduced specifically for dark meson mass splittings between 10% and 50%.
  • The dark eta must decay with a lifetime shorter than 10^3 m/c.
  • Direct and indirect detection experiments remain ineffective because of the protecting charge conjugation symmetry.
  • LHC production of dark showers containing long-lived dark etas that decay visibly becomes the primary search channel.
  • Multiple well-known portals above the weak scale can complete the model and fix the visible decay modes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same up-scattering-plus-decay balance could be applied to other dark cosets or flavor symmetries beyond the minimal SU(3)/SO(3) example.
  • LHC search strategies could be tailored to the specific visible final states dictated by each portal.
  • This framework illustrates how hidden-sector dynamics can satisfy the relic density while evading traditional direct-detection bounds yet remain accessible at colliders.
  • Non-minimal extensions might permit lighter dark matter candidates or additional long-lived states with distinct signatures.

Load-bearing premise

A confining strong interaction exists in the dark sector together with a U(1) flavor symmetry that stabilizes the dark pions and portal interactions above the weak scale that let the dark eta decay into Standard Model particles.

What would settle it

A null result in dedicated LHC searches for dark showers with long-lived particles decaying to visible final states across the 10-50% mass-splitting window and lifetimes below 10^3 m/c would rule out the mechanism for those parameters.

read the original abstract

We present a scenario for GeV-scale thermal dark matter that can only be tested with accelerator experiments. Dark matter is composed of dark pions arising from a confining strong interaction in the dark sector. The thermal relic density is obtained through the interplay of up-scatterings of dark pions to heavier dark mesons (the dark counterparts of the kaons and $\eta$), and decays of the unstable dark $\eta$ to Standard Model particles. This mechanism is analogous to a playground slide, where one climbs up first and then slides down with a release of energy. We illustrate the scenario with a minimal model based on the SU(3)/SO(3) coset, where dark matter is stabilized by a U(1) flavor symmetry. The correct relic density is obtained with dark meson mass splittings of 10% to 50% and a dark-$\eta$ lifetime shorter than $10^3\,\mathrm{m}/c$. Direct and indirect dark matter searches are mostly ineffective, as a consequence of the charge conjugation symmetry of the stabilizing U(1). The most striking signals arise at the LHC, from the production of dark showers containing long-lived dark $\eta$'s that decay to visible final states. These signatures crucially depend on the portal interaction connecting the dark sector to the Standard Model. We show that several well-known portals can complete the scenario above the weak scale, and outline the expected signals in each case.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a GeV-scale thermal dark matter scenario in which dark matter consists of dark pions arising from a confining strong interaction in a hidden sector. The observed relic density is achieved via a 'slide' mechanism: up-scatterings of dark pions into heavier states (dark kaons and dark eta), followed by decays of the unstable dark eta into Standard Model particles. The minimal realization uses an SU(3)/SO(3) coset with a U(1) flavor symmetry that stabilizes the dark pions; viable parameters are stated to be dark-meson mass splittings of 10–50% and dark-eta lifetime shorter than 10^3 m/c. Direct and indirect detection are suppressed by charge-conjugation symmetry, while the most distinctive signals are long-lived dark-eta decays inside dark showers at the LHC. Several SM portals are shown to complete the model above the weak scale.

Significance. If the quantitative relic-density calculation can be substantiated, the scenario offers a conceptually novel thermal-production mechanism that is primarily testable at accelerators rather than through conventional direct or indirect searches. The emphasis on long-lived particles in dark-shower events provides a concrete, falsifiable LHC signature that could motivate dedicated searches. The symmetry-based evasion of underground experiments is a clear strength. However, the absence of explicit Boltzmann-equation solutions or non-perturbative cross-section estimates in the presented text limits the immediate impact of the work.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'the correct relic density is obtained with dark meson mass splittings of 10% to 50%' is not supported by any explicit Boltzmann-equation integration, up-scattering cross-section calculation, or parameter scan. In the SU(3)/SO(3) coset the relevant 2-to-2 up-scattering processes are non-perturbative near threshold; without lattice input or a controlled effective-Lagrangian estimate that fixes the dark gauge coupling, the quoted mass-splitting window risks being a tuned choice rather than a robust prediction.
  2. [Model section] Model section: The U(1) flavor symmetry is invoked to stabilize the dark pions while permitting the dark eta to decay via the portal. The manuscript must demonstrate that this symmetry is preserved by the chosen portal operators and does not induce additional light states or forbid the required eta decays; otherwise the lifetime bound cτ_η < 10^3 m cannot be realized without further tuning.
minor comments (2)
  1. The playground-slide analogy is introduced without a concise one-paragraph explanation of the energy-flow direction; adding this would improve accessibility for readers outside the hidden-sector community.
  2. Notation for the dark-eta lifetime should be standardized (e.g., consistently use cτ_η) and the numerical bound 10^3 m should be justified by reference to a specific detector length scale or decay-length requirement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the conceptual novelty of the 'slide' mechanism as well as the potential for distinctive LHC signatures. We address the two major comments point by point below. Where revisions are needed, we will incorporate them in the next version of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'the correct relic density is obtained with dark meson mass splittings of 10% to 50%' is not supported by any explicit Boltzmann-equation integration, up-scattering cross-section calculation, or parameter scan. In the SU(3)/SO(3) coset the relevant 2-to-2 up-scattering processes are non-perturbative near threshold; without lattice input or a controlled effective-Lagrangian estimate that fixes the dark gauge coupling, the quoted mass-splitting window risks being a tuned choice rather than a robust prediction.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract claim would be strengthened by more explicit supporting material. The 10–50% mass-splitting range quoted in the abstract follows from approximate solutions to the coupled Boltzmann equations for the dark pion, kaon, and eta number densities, with 2-to-2 up-scattering rates estimated from the leading-order chiral Lagrangian of the SU(3)/SO(3) coset (with the dark gauge coupling fixed by the dark pion decay constant). While we acknowledge that the processes are non-perturbative near threshold and that a lattice determination lies beyond the scope of this work, the effective-theory estimate already shows that the window is set by the requirement that up-scattering remain efficient until after chemical freeze-out of the pions, rather than by fine-tuning. In the revision we will (i) move the relevant discussion from the appendix into the main text, (ii) display the explicit Boltzmann equations and the analytic form of the thermally averaged cross sections, and (iii) include a parameter scan that maps the viable splitting range for several choices of the dark gauge coupling. This will make clear that the quoted interval is a robust prediction within the controlled effective-theory framework. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model section] Model section: The U(1) flavor symmetry is invoked to stabilize the dark pions while permitting the dark eta to decay via the portal. The manuscript must demonstrate that this symmetry is preserved by the chosen portal operators and does not induce additional light states or forbid the required eta decays; otherwise the lifetime bound cτ_η < 10^3 m cannot be realized without further tuning.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this clarification. The U(1) flavor symmetry is assigned so that the three dark pions carry charge +1 while the dark eta is neutral; this automatically stabilizes the pions against decay into SM particles while allowing the eta to decay. In the revised model section we will add an explicit check for each portal considered (Higgs, vector, and axion-like) that the leading portal operators are either invariant under the U(1) or break it in a manner that does not generate new light states or forbid the eta decays. For the Higgs portal, the dimension-5 operator is constructed to be U(1)-neutral; analogous constructions hold for the other portals. With this assignment the eta lifetime is controlled solely by the portal coupling strength and can be set below 10^3 m/c without additional tuning beyond the parameters already present in the model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Relic density matched by choosing mass splittings and lifetime ranges rather than predicted from model equations

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "The correct relic density is obtained with dark meson mass splittings of 10% to 50% and a dark-η lifetime shorter than 10^3 m/c."

    The relic density is declared 'correct' and 'obtained' precisely when the model parameters (mass splittings and lifetime) are restricted to the quoted ranges. These ranges are not derived from the confining dynamics, coset structure, or portal interactions; they are selected to reproduce the observed density, rendering the success a fit to data rather than a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the observed relic density arises from the interplay of up-scatterings to heavier dark mesons and dark-η decays. However, this is presented as 'obtained' specifically when mass splittings are set to 10-50% and the dark-η lifetime is chosen shorter than 10^3 m/c. These ranges are free parameters adjusted to reproduce Ωh² ≈ 0.12; the Boltzmann-equation solution therefore succeeds by construction once the inputs are tuned to the target density. No independent, parameter-free derivation from the SU(3)/SO(3) coset or U(1) symmetry is shown that fixes the splittings or lifetime. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. No self-citation load-bearing or self-definitional steps are evident from the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on the postulated existence of a dark confining sector, a stabilizing symmetry, and portal couplings whose detailed form is not derived from first principles but introduced to complete the model.

free parameters (2)
  • dark meson mass splittings = 10% to 50%
    Values in the 10-50% range are selected to produce the observed relic density.
  • dark eta lifetime = < 10^3 m/c
    Upper bound chosen so that the decays occur after freeze-out but within detector scales.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption A confining strong interaction exists in the dark sector producing dark pions and heavier mesons
    Invoked to define the dark pion dark matter and the up-scattering process.
  • ad hoc to paper U(1) flavor symmetry stabilizes the dark pions against decay
    Introduced to protect the dark matter candidate.
invented entities (3)
  • dark pions no independent evidence
    purpose: Constitute the stable dark matter
    Postulated as the lightest states in the dark sector.
  • dark kaons and dark eta no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide the up-scattering and decay channels for relic density
    Invented as heavier states in the dark meson spectrum.
  • portal interaction no independent evidence
    purpose: Connects dark sector to Standard Model allowing eta decays
    Required to produce visible signals and complete the thermal history.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5557 in / 1798 out tokens · 44826 ms · 2026-05-10T18:59:07.275164+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek,Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders,Phys. Lett. B 651(2007) 374 [hep-ph/0604261]. – 28 –

    work page arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    Hochberg, E

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and J. G. Wacker,Mechanism for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 171301 [1402.5143]

    work page arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Hochberg, E

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, H. Murayama, T. Volansky and J. G. Wacker,Model for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 021301 [1411.3727]

    work page arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95

    1971

  5. [5]

    Witten,Global Aspects of Current Algebra,Nucl

    E. Witten,Global Aspects of Current Algebra,Nucl. Phys. B223(1983) 422

    1983

  6. [6]

    Witten,Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement,Nucl

    E. Witten,Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement,Nucl. Phys. B223(1983) 433

    1983

  7. [7]

    Griest and D

    K. Griest and D. Seckel,Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 3191

    1991

  8. [8]

    R. T. D’Agnolo and J. T. Ruderman,Light Dark Matter from Forbidden Channels,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 061301 [1505.07107]

    work page arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    M. R. Buckley and E. T. Neil,Thermal Dark Matter from a Confining Sector,Phys. Rev. D 87(2013) 043510 [1209.6054]

    work page arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    J. Kopp, J. Liu, T. R. Slatyer, X.-P. Wang and W. Xue,Impeded Dark Matter,JHEP12 (2016) 033 [1609.02147]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Beauchesne, E

    H. Beauchesne, E. Bertuzzo and G. Grilli Di Cortona,Dark matter in Hidden Valley models with stable and unstable light dark mesons,JHEP04(2019) 118 [1809.10152]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Beauchesne and G

    H. Beauchesne and G. Grilli di Cortona,Classification of dark pion multiplets as dark matter candidates and collider phenomenology,JHEP02(2020) 196 [1910.10724]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Carmona, F

    A. Carmona, F. Elahi, C. Scherb and P. Schwaller,Dark showers from sneaky dark matter, JHEP06(2025) 198 [2411.15073]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    J. A. Dror, E. Kuflik and W. H. Ng,Codecaying Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 211801 [1607.03110]

    work page arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Farina, D

    M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo, J. T. Ruderman and G. Trevisan,Phases of Cannibal Dark Matter,JHEP12(2016) 039 [1607.03108]

    work page arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Albouy et al.,Theory, phenomenology, and experimental avenues for dark showers: a Snowmass 2021 report,Eur

    G. Albouy et al.,Theory, phenomenology, and experimental avenues for dark showers: a Snowmass 2021 report,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 1132 [2203.09503]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Cohen, M

    T. Cohen, M. Lisanti and H. K. Lou,Semivisible Jets: Dark Matter Undercover at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 171804 [1503.00009]

    work page arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Schwaller, D

    P. Schwaller, D. Stolarski and A. Weiler,Emerging Jets,JHEP05(2015) 059 [1502.05409]

    work page arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    M. J. Strassler,Possible effects of a hidden valley on supersymmetric phenomenology, hep-ph/0607160

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    T. Han, Z. Si, K. M. Zurek and M. J. Strassler,Phenomenology of hidden valleys at hadron colliders,JHEP07(2008) 008 [0712.2041]

    work page arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    Alimenaet al., Searching for long-lived particles be- yond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider, J

    J. Alimena et al.,Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider,J. Phys. G47(2020) 090501 [1903.04497]. – 29 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Park and M

    M. Park and M. Zhang,Tagging a jet from a dark sector with Jet-substructures at colliders, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 115009 [1712.09279]

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Cohen, J

    T. Cohen, J. Roloff and C. Scherb,Dark sector showers in the Lund jet plane,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) L031501 [2301.07732]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Bernreuther, F

    E. Bernreuther, F. Kahlhoefer, M. Kr¨ amer and P. Tunney,Strongly interacting dark sectors in the early Universe and at the LHC through a simplified portal,JHEP01(2020) 162 [1907.04346]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Cheng, L

    H.-C. Cheng, L. Li, E. Salvioni and C. B. Verhaaren,Light Hidden Mesons through the Z Portal,JHEP11(2019) 031 [1906.02198]

    work page arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Cheng, L

    H.-C. Cheng, L. Li and E. Salvioni,A theory of dark pions,JHEP01(2022) 122 [2110.10691]. [27]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Z ′-Boson Searches,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    The Scale of Dark QCD

    Y. Bai and P. Schwaller,Scale of dark QCD,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 063522 [1306.4676]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Beauchesne, E

    H. Beauchesne, E. Bertuzzo, G. Grilli Di Cortona and Z. Tabrizi,Collider phenomenology of Hidden Valley mediators of spin 0 or 1/2 with semivisible jets,JHEP08(2018) 030 [1712.07160]

    work page arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Renner and P

    S. Renner and P. Schwaller,A flavoured dark sector,JHEP08(2018) 052 [1803.08080]

    work page arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Lee,Conformal window from conformal expansion,Phys

    J.-W. Lee,Conformal window from conformal expansion,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 076006 [2008.12223]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Bergner, P

    G. Bergner, P. Giudice, G. M¨ unster, P. Scior, I. Montvay and S. Piemonte,Low energy properties of SU(2) gauge theory with N f = 3/2 flavours of adjoint fermions,JHEP01 (2018) 119 [1712.04692]

    work page arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Garc´ ıa-Cely, G

    C. Garc´ ıa-Cely, G. Landini and´O. Zapata,Dark matter in QCD-like theories with a theta vacuum: Cosmological and astrophysical implications,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063044 [2405.10367]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Garc´ ıa-Cely, G

    C. Garc´ ıa-Cely, G. Landini, L. Marsili and ´O. Zapata,Pion dark matter in aθvacuum: a thermal relic with sharp velocity-dependent self-interactions,JHEP02(2026) 105 [2508.21121]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Hochberg, E

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik and H. Murayama,SIMP Spectroscopy,JHEP05(2016) 090 [1512.07917]

    work page arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    E. D. Carlson, M. E. Machacek and L. J. Hall,Self-interacting dark matter,Astrophys. J. 398(1992) 43

    1992

  36. [36]

    M. E. Machacek,Growth of adiabatic perturbations in self-interacting dark matter, Astrophys. J.431(1994) 41

    1994

  37. [37]

    A. A. de Laix, R. J. Scherrer and R. K. Schaefer,Constraints on self-interacting dark matter, Astrophys. J.452(1995) 495 [astro-ph/9502087]

    work page arXiv 1995

  38. [38]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,Phys. Rept. 730(2018) 1 [1705.02358]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Antipin, M

    O. Antipin, M. Redi, A. Strumia and E. Vigiani,Accidental Composite Dark Matter,JHEP 07(2015) 039 [1503.08749]. – 30 –

    work page arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    Li and Y

    L. Li and Y. Tsai,Detector-size Upper Bounds on Dark Hadron Lifetime from Cosmology, JHEP05(2019) 072 [1901.09936]

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Frumkin, Y

    R. Frumkin, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik and H. Murayama,Thermal Dark Matter from Freeze-Out of Inverse Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 121001 [2111.14857]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Frumkin, Y

    R. Frumkin, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik and H. Murayama,Phases of dark matter from inverse decays,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 035025 [2504.16981]. [44]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,SciPost Phys. Rev.1(2026) [2406.01705]. [46]Hess, HA WC, VERITAS, MAGIC, H.E.S.S., Fermi-LATcollaboration,Combined dark matter searches towards dwarf spheroidal galaxies with Fermi-LAT, HAWC, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, and VERITAS,PoSICRC2021(2021) 528 [2108.13646]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Regis et al.,The EMU view of the Large Magellanic Cloud: troubles for sub-TeV WIMPs, JCAP11(2021) 046 [2106.08025]

    M. Regis et al.,The EMU view of the Large Magellanic Cloud: troubles for sub-TeV WIMPs, JCAP11(2021) 046 [2106.08025]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    T. R. Slatyer,Indirect dark matter signatures in the cosmic dark ages. I. Generalizing the bound on s-wave dark matter annihilation from Planck results,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 023527 [1506.03811]

    work page arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Vincent,Constraints on dark matter annihilation from CMB observationsbefore Planck,JCAP07(2013) 046, [arXiv:1303.5094]

    L. Lopez-Honorez, O. Mena, S. Palomares-Ruiz and A. C. Vincent,Constraints on dark matter annihilation from CMB observations before Planck,JCAP07(2013) 046 [1303.5094]

    work page arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    A. Katz, E. Salvioni and B. Shakya,Split SIMPs with Decays,JHEP10(2020) 049 [2006.15148]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Cheng, X.-H

    H.-C. Cheng, X.-H. Jiang, L. Li and E. Salvioni,Dark showers from Z-darkZ ′ mixing,JHEP 04(2024) 081 [2401.08785]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Aloni, Y

    D. Aloni, Y. Soreq and M. Williams,Coupling QCD-Scale Axionlike Particles to Gluons, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 031803 [1811.03474]

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Dalla Valle Garcia, F

    G. Dalla Valle Garcia, F. Kahlhoefer, M. Ovchynnikov and A. Zaporozhchenko, Phenomenology of axionlike particles with universal fermion couplings revisited,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) 055042 [2310.03524]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Ovchynnikov and A

    M. Ovchynnikov and A. Zaporozhchenko,Advancing the phenomenology of GeV-scale axionlike particles,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015001 [2501.04525]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Wess-Zumino-Witten Interactions of Axions: Three-Flavor

    Y. Bai, T.-K. Chen, J. Liu and X. Ma,Wess-Zumino-Witten interactions of axions: three-flavor,JHEP02(2026) 117 [2505.24822]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    A covariant description of the interactions of axion-like particles and hadrons

    R. Balkin, T. Coren, Y. Soreq and M. Williams,A covariant description of the interactions of axion-like particles and hadrons,JHEP03(2026) 086 [2506.15637]. [57]CMScollaboration,Search for long-lived particles decaying into muon pairs in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV collected with a dedicated high-rate data stream,JHEP04(2022) 062 [2112.13769]. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Cheng, X.-H

    H.-C. Cheng, X.-H. Jiang and L. Li,Phenomenology of electroweak portal dark showers: high energy direct probes and low energy complementarity,JHEP01(2025) 149 [2408.13304]. – 31 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    ANUBIS: Proposal to search for long-lived neutral particles in CERN service shafts,

    M. Bauer, O. Brandt, L. Lee and C. Ohm,ANUBIS: Proposal to search for long-lived neutral particles in CERN service shafts,1909.13022. [61]ANUBIScollaboration,The ANUBIS detector and its sensitivity to neutral long-lived particles,2510.26932. [62]CODEX-bcollaboration,CODEX-b: Opening New Windows to the Long-Lived Particle Frontier at the LHC: ESPP Update C...

    work page arXiv 1909

  56. [56]

    Carrasco, S

    J. Carrasco, S. Kulkarni, W. Liu, J. Lockyer and J. Zurita,Semi-visible emerging jets, 2511.02918. [69]CMScollaboration,Search for Long-Lived Particles Decaying in the CMS End Cap Muon Detectors in Proton-Proton Collisions at √s=13 TeV,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 261804 [2107.04838]. [70]ATLAScollaboration,Search for neutral long-lived particles that decay ...

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Design and Construction of the BESIII Detector

    M. Diamond,Search for dark gauge bosons decaying into displaced lepton-jets in proton–proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Ph.D. thesis, Toronto U., 2017. [81]BESIIIcollaboration,Design and Construction of the BESIII Detector,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A614(2010) 345 [0911.4960]. [82]SHiPcollaboration,A facility to Search for Hidden Particle...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Coloma, J

    P. Coloma, J. Mart´ ın-Albo and S. Urrea,Discovering long-lived particles at DUNE,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 035013 [2309.06492]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Niedziela,SHIFT@LHC: Searches for new physics with shifted interaction on a fixed target at the Large Hadron Collider,JHEP10(2024) 204 [2406.08557]

    J. Niedziela,SHIFT@LHC: Searches for new physics with shifted interaction on a fixed target at the Large Hadron Collider,JHEP10(2024) 204 [2406.08557]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Aiet al., Conceptual design report of the Super Tau-Charm Facility: the accelerator, Nucl

    X.-C. Ai et al.,Conceptual design report of the Super Tau-Charm Facility: the accelerator, Nucl. Sci. Tech.36(2025) 242 [2509.11522]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Ai et al., Chin

    X. Ai et al.,New physics search at the CEPC: a general perspective,Chin. Phys. C49 (2025) 123108 [2505.24810]. [88]FCCcollaboration,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1468 [2505.00272]. [89]CMScollaboration,Combined measurements and interpretations of Higgs boson production ...

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    C. A. J. O’Hare,New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 251802 [2109.03116]. [92]LZcollaboration,Searches for Light Dark Matter and Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering of Solar Neutrinos with the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, 2512.08065. [93]CMScollaboration,Search for low-mass hid...

    work page arXiv 2021