pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06660 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mes-hall· math-ph· math.MP

Cholesteric Fingers from a Magnetic Perspective: Topology, Energetics, and Interactions

Takayuki Shigenaga , Andrey O. Leonov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mes-hallmath-phmath.MP
keywords cholesteric fingersmeronsbimeronstopological solitonsliquid crystalschiral magnetshomeotropic confinementconfinement effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cholesteric fingers are composite chiral solitons built from merons, with CF-2 as a bimeron of unit topological charge and CF-1 as a neutral pair of same-vorticity merons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish a unified topological and energetic description of cholesteric fingers by mapping liquid crystal textures onto their magnetic counterparts. It claims that the two main finger types are built from simpler meron units, which fixes their net charge, how they repel or attract, and when they form extended periodic lattices under confinement. A sympathetic reader would care because this particle-like view explains thickness-controlled stability, bistability between states, and the emergence of mixed sequences when finger energy turns negative. If correct, it would mean film thickness and anchoring strength can be used to tune soliton collapse or nucleation in confined chiral systems.

Core claim

Within a continuum framework including bulk and surface anisotropies, cholesteric fingers are shown to be composite chiral solitons built from merons. CF-2 corresponds to a bimeron with unit topological charge, while CF-1 is a topologically trivial composite of two merons with identical vorticities. From a homotopic viewpoint these textures correspond to skyrmions and droplets. Strong homeotropic anchoring induces confinement effects that reshape the meron structure and redistribute topological charge across the film thickness. Isolated fingers in the homogeneous state interact repulsively and behave as particle-like objects, with periodic phases emerging when the energy of an isolatedfinger

What carries the argument

The correspondence between the Frank-Oseen continuum model for liquid crystals and the Dzyaloshinskii model for chiral magnets, which permits treating cholesteric fingers as meron composites and transferring topological and energetic results between the two systems.

Load-bearing premise

The close correspondence between the Frank-Oseen model for liquid crystals and the Dzyaloshinskii model for magnets remains valid when bulk and surface anisotropies plus strong homeotropic confinement are included, allowing direct transfer of topological and energetic results.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the integrated topological charge of isolated CF-2 fingers equaling one and CF-1 fingers equaling zero, for example by computing the skyrmion number or equivalent winding from the director field across the film thickness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06660 by Andrey O. Leonov, Takayuki Shigenaga.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Axisymmetric “relatives” of cholesteric fingers and their topological connections. (a) Axisymmetric chiral magnetic skyrmion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Internal topological and energetic structure of isolated cholesteric fingers CF–1 and CF–2 embedded in a homogeneous background [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Topologically and energetically equivalent realizations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Interaction potentials between cholesteric fingers. (a)–(e) Interaction potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Phase diagrams and periodic finger phases. (a),(b) Phase diagrams in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Energy-density mechanism underlying attractive interactions between cholesteric fingers CF-2 in the conical background. (a) Energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Mixed periodic states of cholesteric fingers and their energetic hierarchy. (a)–(f) Color plots of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Thickness dependence of cholesteric fingers and stability limits of their modulated phases. (a) Color plots of the topological charge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Bistability of isolated bimerons at large film thickness. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Four types of isolated hopfions obtained by revolving CF–1 and CF–2 textures about the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Chiral liquid crystals and chiral magnets host a wide variety of topological solitons described by closely related continuum theories, namely the Frank-Oseen and Dzyaloshinskii models. Exploiting this correspondence, we develop a unified description of cholesteric fingers in confined liquid crystals and their magnetic counterparts. Within a continuum framework including bulk and surface anisotropies, we analyze the topology, structure, interactions, and collective states of the two main finger types, CF-1 and CF-2. We show that cholesteric fingers are composite chiral solitons built from merons. CF-2 corresponds to a bimeron with unit topological charge, while CF-1 is a topologically trivial composite of two merons with identical vorticities. From a homotopic viewpoint these textures correspond to skyrmions and droplets. Strong homeotropic anchoring induces confinement effects that reshape the meron structure and redistribute topological charge across the film thickness. Isolated fingers in the homogeneous state interact repulsively and behave as particle-like objects. Periodic phases emerge when the energy of an isolated finger becomes negative, leading to nucleation-type transitions with a diverging lattice period. Degenerate finger types allow mixed periodic sequences, analogous to stacking polytypes. In a conical background, interactions become attractive due to overlap of distortion regions. Film thickness controls stability and structure: at small thickness solitons collapse, while at large thickness bimerons exhibit bistability between surface-stabilized and bulk-like states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified continuum description of cholesteric fingers (CF-1 and CF-2) in homeotropically confined chiral liquid crystals by mapping them onto topological solitons in chiral magnets through the correspondence between the Frank-Oseen and Dzyaloshinskii models. It claims that both finger types are composite chiral solitons built from merons, with CF-2 identified as a bimeron carrying unit topological charge and CF-1 as a topologically trivial pair of merons with identical vorticities; these textures are further related to skyrmions and droplets from a homotopic perspective. The work examines confinement-induced reshaping of meron structure and redistribution of topological charge, repulsive interactions of isolated fingers, nucleation of periodic phases when finger energy turns negative, attractive interactions in conical backgrounds, thickness-dependent stability and bistability, and analogies to polytype stacking.

Significance. If the topological identifications and interaction predictions hold, the manuscript provides a useful bridge between liquid-crystal and magnetic soliton literature, enabling transfer of concepts such as bimeron energetics and collective states. The explicit inclusion of bulk/surface anisotropies and strong homeotropic boundaries adds realism to the model and highlights how confinement modifies soliton structure. The discussion of thickness-controlled collapse, bistability, and mixed periodic sequences offers testable predictions for experiments. These strengths are tempered by the need to confirm that integer topological invariants survive the confined mapping.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and topology analysis] Abstract and the topology section: the central claim that CF-2 is a unit-charge bimeron while CF-1 is topologically trivial rests on direct transfer of homotopy classes from the magnetic Dzyaloshinskii model. However, the manuscript incorporates strong homeotropic anchoring (n_z = ±1 at the plates) together with bulk and surface anisotropies, which the abstract itself states redistributes topological charge across the film thickness. No explicit evaluation of the Pontryagin index (or equivalent skyrmion number integral) is supplied under these boundary conditions, so it remains unclear whether the integer charge and homotopy class are preserved or altered by the confinement.
  2. [Energetics and collective states] The section on energetics and periodic phases: the statement that periodic phases nucleate when the energy of an isolated finger becomes negative is load-bearing for the predicted transitions and diverging lattice period. Without reported numerical values, plots of finger energy versus thickness, anisotropy strength, or cholesteric pitch, or a clear definition of the reference energy (homogeneous state), the parameter regime and the nature of the transition cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for vorticities and meron decomposition should be defined explicitly when first introduced, including how the two merons in CF-1 are distinguished from those in CF-2.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a short table summarizing the topological charge, vorticity, and homotopy class for CF-1, CF-2, and their magnetic counterparts under both bulk and confined conditions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised regarding the explicit verification of topological invariants under confinement and the need for quantitative energetics data are well taken. We address each major comment below and will make the indicated revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and topology analysis] Abstract and the topology section: the central claim that CF-2 is a unit-charge bimeron while CF-1 is topologically trivial rests on direct transfer of homotopy classes from the magnetic Dzyaloshinskii model. However, the manuscript incorporates strong homeotropic anchoring (n_z = ±1 at the plates) together with bulk and surface anisotropies, which the abstract itself states redistributes topological charge across the film thickness. No explicit evaluation of the Pontryagin index (or equivalent skyrmion number integral) is supplied under these boundary conditions, so it remains unclear whether the integer charge and homotopy class are preserved or altered by the confinement.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not include an explicit numerical evaluation of the Pontryagin index under the confined boundary conditions with anisotropies. However, the topological charge remains an integer because the strong homeotropic boundaries fix the director to the uniform state (corresponding to the vacuum in the magnetic analogy), preserving the homotopy class of the in-plane texture; the redistribution occurs only in the z-direction while the integrated charge over the film is invariant. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit computation of the skyrmion number integral for representative parameter values, confirming unit charge for CF-2 and triviality for CF-1. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Energetics and collective states] The section on energetics and periodic phases: the statement that periodic phases nucleate when the energy of an isolated finger becomes negative is load-bearing for the predicted transitions and diverging lattice period. Without reported numerical values, plots of finger energy versus thickness, anisotropy strength, or cholesteric pitch, or a clear definition of the reference energy (homogeneous state), the parameter regime and the nature of the transition cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative support is needed to assess the parameter regimes. The reference energy is that of the uniform homeotropic state, and the transition occurs when the excess energy per unit length of an isolated finger becomes negative. In the revised manuscript we will include plots of isolated-finger energy versus film thickness, anisotropy strength, and cholesteric pitch, together with the explicit definition of the reference state, to substantiate the nucleation of periodic phases with diverging lattice period. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model correspondence is external and non-reductive

full rationale

The derivation rests on the established equivalence of the Frank-Oseen and Dzyaloshinskii continuum energies, extended by explicit inclusion of bulk/surface anisotropies and homeotropic boundary conditions. Topology assignments (CF-2 as unit-charge bimeron, CF-1 as trivial meron pair) and interaction energetics follow from direct minimization and homotopy analysis within the augmented functional; no step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or unverified self-citation chain. Prior magnetic-soliton literature supplies context but is not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing premise that would force the LC results. The analysis of confinement-induced charge redistribution and periodic phases is self-contained within the present energy functional.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the continuum approximation and the model correspondence under confinement; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Frank-Oseen and Dzyaloshinskii continuum models remain sufficiently close when bulk and surface anisotropies are added.
    Invoked to justify the unified description of fingers in both systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5582 in / 1352 out tokens · 43005 ms · 2026-05-10T18:32:49.872530+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    energy band

    For each finger type, only two realizations possess the rotational sense favored by the DMI and are therefore sta- ble. Other conceivable counterparts, obtained by reversing the sense of rotation, are energetically unfavorable due to the 8 FIG. 3. Topologically and energetically equivalent realizations of cholesteric fingers of the first (CF–1) and second...

    work page

  2. [2]

    For CF–1, this instability is accompanied by a systematic increase of the structural anglesθ 1 andθ 2

    Effect of decreasing film thickness Upon decreasing the film thickness, both CF–1 and CF–2 eventually lose stability and disappear. For CF–1, this instability is accompanied by a systematic increase of the structural anglesθ 1 andθ 2. In Fig. 8(a), color plots of the topological charge density are shown for three characteristic film thicknesses,ν=0.85, 1....

    work page

  3. [3]

    According to Fig

    Effect of increasing film thickness The opposite tendency is observed with increasing film thickness. According to Fig. 8(g), the critical lines merge aboveν≈1.2. As a result, the trivial CF–1 and unitary CF–2 fingers acquire very similar internal structures [Fig. 8(b),(c)]. To illustrate this, we conceptually divide the fingers by the central plane of th...

    work page

  4. [4]

    This proximity indicates that hopfions repre- sent localized precursor configurations of the modulated fin- ger phases: they inherit the internal structure of cholesteric 16 FIG

    for details]. This proximity indicates that hopfions repre- sent localized precursor configurations of the modulated fin- ger phases: they inherit the internal structure of cholesteric 16 FIG. 9. Bistability of isolated bimerons at large film thickness. (a) Color plots of them x component of the magnetization for two bimeron configurations (large and smal...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Manton and P

    N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe,Topological solitons(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Y . M. Shnir,Topological and non-topological solitons in scalar field theories(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    V olovik and V

    G. V olovik and V . Mineev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz73, 767 (1977)

    work page 1977

  8. [8]

    Rajaraman,Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Soli- tons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982)

    R. Rajaraman,Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Soli- tons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982)

    work page 1982

  9. [9]

    A. O. Leonov and K. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Mater.10, 036001 (2026)

    work page 2026

  10. [10]

    A. N. Bogdanov and D. Yablonskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz95, 178 (1989)

    work page 1989

  11. [11]

    Bogdanov and A

    A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials138, 255 (1994)

    work page 1994

  12. [12]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y . Tokura, Nature Nanotechnology8, 899 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Oswald and P

    P. Oswald and P. Pieranski,Nematic and cholesteric liquid crys- tals: concepts and physical properties illustrated by experi- ments(CRC press, 2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    Faddeev and A

    L. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, Nature387, 58 (1997)

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    Bott and L

    R. Bott and L. W. Tu,Differential forms in algebraic topology, V ol. 82 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    A. A. Kovalev and S. Sandhoefner, Frontiers in Physics6, 98 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Dzyaloshinskii, Sov

    I. Dzyaloshinskii, Sov. Phys. JETP19, 960 (1964)

    work page 1964

  18. [18]

    Moriya, Physical Review120, 91 (1960)

    T. Moriya, Physical Review120, 91 (1960)

    work page 1960

  19. [19]

    Hobart, Proceedings of the Physical Society82, 201 (1963)

    R. Hobart, Proceedings of the Physical Society82, 201 (1963)

    work page 1963

  20. [20]

    Derrick, Journal of Mathematical Physics5, 1252 (1964)

    G. Derrick, Journal of Mathematical Physics5, 1252 (1964)

    work page 1964

  21. [21]

    Wiesendanger, Nature Reviews Materials1, 1 (2016)

    R. Wiesendanger, Nature Reviews Materials1, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Course of theoretical physics 18 (Elsevier, 2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Muhlbauer, B

    S. Muhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. Boni, Science323, 915 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    Wilhelm, M

    H. Wilhelm, M. Baenitz, M. Schmidt, U. R ¨oßler, A. Leonov, and A. Bogdanov, Physical Review Letters107, 127203 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Leonov and C

    A. Leonov and C. Pappas, Physical Review B99, 144410 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Pappas, E

    C. Pappas, E. Lelievre-Berna, P. Falus, P. Bentley, E. Moskvin, S. Grigoriev, P. Fouquet, and B. Farago, Physical Review Let- ters102, 197202 (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    A. O. Leonov, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics25, 28691 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    X. Z. Yuet al., Nature Materials10, 106 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Jonietz, S

    F. Jonietz, S. M ¨uhlbauer, C. Pfleiderer, A. Neubauer, W. M¨unzer, A. Bauer, T. Adams, R. Georgii, P. B ¨oni, R. A. Duine,et al., Science330, 1648 (2010)

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    A. Fert, V . Cros, and J. Sampaio, Nature Nanotechnology8, 152 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Mukai and A

    N. Mukai and A. O. Leonov, Physical Review B106, 224428 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    De Gennes, Proc

    P. De Gennes, Proc. Nato Advanced Study Institute, Geilo Nor- way (1975)

    work page 1975

  33. [33]

    Kov ´acs, J

    A. Kov ´acs, J. Caron, A. S. Savchenko, N. S. Kiselev, K. Shi- bata, Z.-A. Li, N. Kanazawa, Y . Tokura, S. Bl ¨ugel, and R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, Applied Physics Letters111(2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Togawa, T

    Y . Togawa, T. Koyama, K. Takayanagi, S. Mori, Y . Kousaka, J. Akimitsu, S. Nishihara, K. Inoue, A. Ovchinnikov, and J.-i. Kishine, Physical Review Letters108, 107202 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Bogdanov and A

    A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials195, 182 (1999)

    work page 1999

  36. [36]

    Komineas and N

    S. Komineas and N. Papanicolaou, Physical Review B92, 064412 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Nakamura and A

    K. Nakamura and A. Leonov, Physical Review B110, 094403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Bogdanov and U

    A. Bogdanov and U. R ¨oßler, Physical Review Letters87, 037203 (2001)

    work page 2001

  39. [39]

    M. Bode, M. Heide, K. V on Bergmann, P. Ferriani, S. Heinze, G. Bihlmayer, A. Kubetzka, O. Pietzsch, S. Bl ¨ugel, and R. Wiesendanger, Nature447, 190 (2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    D. C. Wright and N. D. Mermin, Reviews of Modern physics 61, 385 (1989)

    work page 1989

  41. [41]

    J. P. Sethna, Physical Review Letters51, 2198 (1983)

    work page 1983

  42. [42]

    T. H. R. Skyrme, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences260, 127 (1961)

    work page 1961

  43. [43]

    P. J. Ackerman and I. I. Smalyukh, Physical Review X7, 011006 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    P. J. Ackerman and I. I. Smalyukh, Nature Materials16, 426 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Donnelly and V

    C. Donnelly and V . Scagnoli, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 213001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Afghah and J

    S. Afghah and J. V . Selinger, Physical Review E96, 012708 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Leonov, I

    A. Leonov, I. Dragunov, U. R ¨oßler, and A. Bogdanov, Physical Review E90, 042502 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Nych, J.-i

    A. Nych, J.-i. Fukuda, U. Ognysta, S. ˇZumer, and I. Mu ˇseviˇc, Nature Physics13, 1215 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Kleman and O

    M. Kleman and O. D. Lavrentovich,Soft matter physics: an introduction(Springer, 2003)

    work page 2003

  50. [50]

    Gil and J

    L. Gil and J. Gilli, Physical Review Letters80, 5742 (1998)

    work page 1998

  51. [51]

    R. B. Meyer, inMolecular Fluids, edited by R. Balian and G. Weill (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1976) pp. 271–343

    work page 1976

  52. [52]

    De Gennes, J

    P.-G. De Gennes, J. Prost,et al., International series of mono- graphs on physics83, 2 (1995)

    work page 1995

  53. [53]

    A. O. Leonov and T. Shigenaga, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22846 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    A. O. Leonov, Physical Review E104, 044701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Ribi `ere, S

    P. Ribi `ere, S. Pirkl, and P. Oswald, Liquid Crystals16, 203 (1994)

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    J.-S. B. Tai and I. I. Smalyukh, Physical Review Letters121, 187201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia- Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, AIP advances4(2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Karhu, U

    E. Karhu, U. R ¨oßler, A. Bogdanov, S. Kahwaji, B. Kirby, H. Fritzsche, M. Robertson, C. Majkrzak, and T. Monchesky, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 85, 094429 (2012)

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    Huang and C

    S. Huang and C. Chien, Physical Review Letters108, 267201 (2012)

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    Dieny and M

    B. Dieny and M. Chshiev, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 025008 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Johnson, P

    M. Johnson, P. Bloemen, F. Den Broeder, and J. De Vries, Re- ports on Progress in Physics59, 1409 (1996)

    work page 1996

  62. [62]

    Kawaguchi, Y

    Y . Kawaguchi, Y . Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, Physical Review B 93, 064416 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    N. A. Porter, C. S. Spencer, R. C. Temple, C. J. Kinane, T. R. Charlton, S. Langridge, and C. H. Marrows, Phys. Rev. B92, 144402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    S.-Z. Lin, A. Saxena, and C. D. Batista, Physical Review B91, 224407 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    Ohara, X

    K. Ohara, X. Zhang, Y . Chen, S. Kato, J. Xia, M. Ezawa, O. A. Tretiakov, Z. Hou, Y . Zhou, G. Zhao,et al., Nano Letters22, 8559 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    A. O. Leonov, A. N. Bogdanov, and K. Inoue, Phys. Rev. B98, 060411 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Duzgun, J

    A. Duzgun, J. V . Selinger, and A. Saxena, Physical Review E 97, 062706 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Bachmann, M

    D. Bachmann, M. Lianeris, and S. Komineas, Physical Review B108, 014402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Mukai and A

    N. Mukai and A. O. Leonov, Nanomaterials14, 504 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Barton-Singer and B

    B. Barton-Singer and B. Schroers, SciPost Physics15, 011 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    Sisodia, P

    N. Sisodia, P. K. Muduli, N. Papanicolaou, and S. Komineas, Physical Review B103, 024431 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Y . Zhou, E. Iacocca, A. A. Awad, R. K. Dumas, F. Zhang, H. B. Braun, and J. Åkerman, Nature Communications6, 8193 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    R ´ozsa, K

    L. R ´ozsa, K. Palot´as, A. De´ak, E. Simon, R. Yanes, L. Udvardi, L. Szunyogh, and U. Nowak, Physical Review B95, 094423 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    Press and A

    M. Press and A. Arrott, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 37, 81 (1976)

    work page 1976

  75. [75]

    Leonov, T

    A. Leonov, T. Monchesky, N. Romming, A. Kubetzka, A. Bog- danov, and R. Wiesendanger, New Journal of Physics18, 065003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  76. [76]

    Leonov, G

    A. Leonov, G. G ¨odecke, J. Grefe, S. S ¨ullow, and D. Menzel, Physical Review Research8, 013130 (2026)

    work page 2026

  77. [77]

    Crisanti, A

    M. Crisanti, A. Leonov, R. Cubitt, A. Labh, H. Wilhelm, M. P. Schmidt, and C. Pappas, Physical Review Research5, 033033 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    A. O. Leonov, C. Pappas, and I. I. Smalyukh, Physical Review B104, 064432 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    Loudon, A

    J. Loudon, A. Leonov, A. Bogdanov, M. C. Hatnean, and G. Balakrishnan, Physical Review B97, 134403 (2018)

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    Jagodzinski, Acta crystallographica2, 201 (1949)

    H. Jagodzinski, Acta crystallographica2, 201 (1949)

    work page 1949

Showing first 80 references.