arxiv: 2604.07446 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The mathcal{N}=1 Super-Grassmannian for CFT₃ and a Foray on AdS and Cosmological Correlators

Aswini Bala , Sachin Jain , Dhruva K.S. , Adithya A Rao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP

keywords Super-GrassmannianN=1 SCFT3n-point functionsoperator-valued delta functionsAdS4 correlatorscontact diagramsYang-Mills gluonflat-space limit

0 comments

The pith

A Super-Grassmannian integral representation encodes n-point functions in N=1 SCFT3 through operator-valued delta-function constraints that enforce all symmetries at once.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an integral representation over the super-Grassmannian for n-point correlation functions in three-dimensional N=1 superconformal field theory. Conformal invariance, supersymmetry, and special superconformal invariance appear directly as operator-valued delta functions inside the integral. This structure produces algebraic relations among the various component correlators, so that any one can be obtained from any other. The same relations are then used to construct (A)dS4 boundary correlators that contain contact diagrams starting from diagrams built only from particle exchanges, with the explicit example of deriving the Yang-Mills gluon four-point function from its gluino counterpart. The flat-space limit of the superspace expressions is shown to match known results.

Core claim

We construct a Super-Grassmannian integral representation for n-point functions in N=1 SCFT3. In this formalism, conformal invariance, supersymmetry, and special superconformal invariance are implemented manifestly through (operator-valued) delta function constraints. An important feature of this framework is the fact that we obtain simple algebraic relations among component correlators, which enable us to determine any component correlator in terms of just one of the component correlators. In particular, this formalism enables us to construct (A)dS4 boundary correlators with contact diagrams from those that receive contributions purely from particle exchanges. We illustrate this by 4-point

What carries the argument

The Super-Grassmannian integral representation, which places operator-valued delta functions on the integration variables to enforce conformal, supersymmetric, and special superconformal invariance simultaneously and thereby generates algebraic relations among component correlators.

If this is right

Any component correlator is determined algebraically from any other once one is known.
Boundary correlators in (A)dS4 that include contact diagrams are obtained directly from correlators that receive only particle-exchange contributions.
The four-point gluon correlator in (A)dS4 Yang-Mills theory follows from its gluino counterpart.
The flat-space limit of the superspace expressions reproduces existing flat-space results.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same algebraic reduction may simplify the evaluation of higher-point functions or correlators in other supersymmetric models.
The mapping from exchange-only to contact-inclusive diagrams could be applied to cosmological correlators beyond the AdS setting mentioned in the title.
The framework supplies a concrete test: the derived gluon four-point function can be compared against a direct computation performed without the super-Grassmannian.

Load-bearing premise

The operator-valued delta functions correctly and completely implement conformal invariance, supersymmetry, and special superconformal invariance without additional constraints or omissions that would affect the algebraic relations among component correlators.

What would settle it

An explicit, independent calculation of the (A)dS4 Yang-Mills gluon four-point function that disagrees with the expression obtained from the gluino four-point function via the algebraic relations would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

We construct a Super-Grassmannian integral representation for $n-$point functions in $\mathcal{N}=1$ SCFT$_3$. In this formalism, conformal invariance, supersymmetry, and special superconformal invariance are implemented manifestly through (operator-valued) delta function constraints. An important feature of this framework is the fact that we obtain simple algebraic relations among component correlators, which enable us to determine any component correlator in terms of just one of the component correlators. In particular, this formalism enables us to construct (A)dS$_4$ boundary correlators with contact diagrams from those that receive contributions purely from particle exchanges. We illustrate this by determining the (A)dS$_4$ Yang-Mills gluon four-point function from its gluino counterpart. Further, we establish the flat-space limit in super-space, finding a perfect agreement with existing flat-space results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The Super-Grassmannian integral with operator deltas gives algebraic relations that reduce all N=1 SCFT3 component correlators to one and maps gluino exchange to gluon contact diagrams in AdS4, but the deltas' completeness on special superconformal generators needs explicit checks.

read the letter

The paper builds a Super-Grassmannian integral representation for n-point functions in N=1 SCFT3. Operator-valued delta functions are meant to enforce conformal invariance, supersymmetry, and special superconformal invariance directly in the measure. This produces simple algebraic relations among the component correlators, so any one can be determined from a single independent one. They apply the setup to (A)dS4 boundary correlators by turning pure-exchange diagrams into contact diagrams, with the concrete example of deriving the Yang-Mills gluon four-point function from its gluino counterpart. They also recover the flat-space limit in superspace and match known results there. The algebraic reduction and the explicit map from gluino to gluon are the clearest new pieces relative to standard superspace or Grassmannian methods. The flat-space agreement is a useful consistency check. The main soft spot is whether the operator deltas fully capture the action of the special superconformal generators without omissions or ordering issues in the Grassmannian measure. If they do not close properly, the claimed relations between components would not hold in general and the AdS4 construction would rest on incomplete constraints. The abstract gives no explicit integrals or derivations, so the full paper must supply those details for the four-point case to be convincing. The construction is internally coherent on its own terms and the flat-space test helps, but the delta-function claim is load-bearing and should be verified directly. This is for people computing supersymmetric correlators in three dimensions or doing holographic calculations in AdS4 with fermions and bosons. A reader who needs a systematic way to relate different component functions or to generate contact terms from exchanges could use the formalism. It deserves a serious referee because the tool is new, the application is concrete, and the flat-space check provides an external anchor, even if the delta details require tightening.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a Super-Grassmannian integral representation for n-point functions in N=1 SCFT3. Conformal invariance, supersymmetry, and special superconformal invariance are imposed manifestly via operator-valued delta-function constraints. This yields simple algebraic relations among component correlators, allowing any component to be determined from one other. The formalism is used to build (A)dS4 boundary correlators containing contact diagrams from those built purely from exchanges, illustrated by obtaining the Yang-Mills gluon four-point function from its gluino counterpart, and the flat-space limit is shown to agree with known results.

Significance. If the integral representation and the completeness of the delta-function constraints hold, the work supplies a new manifestly invariant formalism for SCFT3 correlators that directly relates different component functions algebraically. This has clear utility for supersymmetric AdS/CFT calculations and for cosmological correlators, where relating contact and exchange contributions without recomputing integrals could simplify higher-point analyses.

major comments (2)

[Main construction of the Super-Grassmannian integral and delta constraints] The central application (deriving the (A)dS4 gluon four-point contact diagram from the gluino exchange diagram via component relations) rests on the operator-valued delta functions fully enforcing special superconformal invariance. The manuscript must supply an explicit computation of the action of the special superconformal generators on the superfields through these deltas, including any ordering or measure factors, to confirm there are no omissions that would alter the algebraic relations among components.
[Illustration with Yang-Mills gluon four-point function] No explicit evaluation of the integral representation or derivation of the delta constraints is provided even for the four-point gluon-gluino example. Without at least one worked-out case showing how the deltas produce the claimed algebraic relation, it is impossible to verify that the formalism reproduces known results or correctly implements the symmetries.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the flat-space limit agrees with existing results but does not identify which flat-space expressions are recovered or cite the relevant references.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, agreeing that additional explicit verifications will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central application (deriving the (A)dS4 gluon four-point contact diagram from the gluino exchange diagram via component relations) rests on the operator-valued delta functions fully enforcing special superconformal invariance. The manuscript must supply an explicit computation of the action of the special superconformal generators on the superfields through these deltas, including any ordering or measure factors, to confirm there are no omissions that would alter the algebraic relations among components.

Authors: We agree that an explicit computation of the action of the special superconformal generators on the superfields, via the operator-valued delta-function constraints, is necessary to fully substantiate the claim that these deltas enforce the invariance without omissions. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated subsection performing this calculation in detail, including careful treatment of operator ordering and any Jacobian or measure factors from the Super-Grassmannian integral. This will confirm the algebraic relations among component correlators and directly support the central application to (A)dS4 boundary correlators. revision: yes
Referee: No explicit evaluation of the integral representation or derivation of the delta constraints is provided even for the four-point gluon-gluino example. Without at least one worked-out case showing how the deltas produce the claimed algebraic relation, it is impossible to verify that the formalism reproduces known results or correctly implements the symmetries.

Authors: We acknowledge that the four-point Yang-Mills example is currently presented at a schematic level. To address this, the revised manuscript will include a fully worked-out derivation for the gluon-gluino four-point case. This will explicitly evaluate the Super-Grassmannian integral representation, derive the relevant delta constraints step by step, and demonstrate how they produce the algebraic relation between the gluon contact diagram and the gluino exchange diagram, with direct comparison to known flat-space results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; new integral representation with manifest symmetries derived independently.

full rationale

The paper constructs a Super-Grassmannian integral representation for N=1 SCFT3 n-point functions, introducing operator-valued delta functions to enforce conformal invariance, supersymmetry, and special superconformal invariance. Algebraic relations among component correlators are obtained as consequences of this setup, enabling the mapping from gluino-exchange diagrams to gluon contact diagrams in (A)dS4 without presupposing the target results. The flat-space limit is verified against independent existing results rather than fitted internally. No equations reduce the central claims to self-definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations; the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are visible. The delta-function implementation of symmetries is treated as a domain assumption whose validity cannot be checked without the full text.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Operator-valued delta functions implement conformal invariance, supersymmetry, and special superconformal invariance
Stated directly in the abstract as the mechanism that makes symmetries manifest.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1339 out tokens · 46304 ms · 2026-05-10T17:47:14.945712+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We construct a Super-Grassmannian integral representation for n-point functions in N=1 SCFT3. ... conformal invariance, supersymmetry, and special superconformal invariance are implemented manifestly through (operator-valued) delta function constraints.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

An important feature of this framework is the fact that we obtain simple algebraic relations among component correlators, which enable us to determine any component correlator in terms of just one of the component correlators.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

The Conformal Grassmannian: A Symplectic Bi-Grassmannian for $CFT_ 4$ Correlators
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A new symplectic bi-Grassmannian representation encodes CFT4 Wightman correlators via integrals over mutually symplectically orthogonal n-planes aligned with kinematics, reproducing known 2- and 3-point structures com...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Poland and D

D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin,Snowmass White Paper: The Numerical Conformal Bootstrap, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.08117]. – 31 –

work page arXiv 2021
[2]

The analytic bootstrap and AdS superhorizon locality,

A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin,The Analytic Bootstrap and AdS Superhorizon Locality,JHEP12(2013) 004 [1212.3616]

work page arXiv 2013
[3]

Komargodski and A

Z. Komargodski and A. Zhiboedov,Convexity and Liberation at Large Spin,JHEP11(2013) 140 [1212.4103]

work page arXiv 2013
[4]

Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry,

J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov,Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry,J. Phys. A46(2013) 214011 [1112.1016]

work page arXiv 2013
[5]

Maldacena and A

J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov,Constraining conformal field theories with a slightly broken higher spin symmetry,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 104003 [1204.3882]

work page arXiv 2013
[6]

On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,

J.M. Maldacena and G.L. Pimentel,On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,JHEP 09(2011) 045 [1104.2846]

work page arXiv 2011
[7]

McFadden and K

P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Cosmological 3-point correlators from holography,JCAP06 (2011) 030 [1104.3894]

work page arXiv 2011
[8]

Solving the Conformal Constraints for Scalar Operators in Momentum Space and the Evaluation of Feynman’s Master Integrals,

C. Coriano, L. Delle Rose, E. Mottola and M. Serino,Solving the Conformal Constraints for Scalar Operators in Momentum Space and the Evaluation of Feynman’s Master Integrals, JHEP07(2013) 011 [1304.6944]

work page arXiv 2013
[9]

Implications of Conformal Invariance in Momentum Space,

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space,JHEP03(2014) 111 [1304.7760]

work page arXiv 2014
[10]

Ghosh, N

A. Ghosh, N. Kundu, S. Raju and S.P. Trivedi,Conformal Invariance and the Four Point Scalar Correlator in Slow-Roll Inflation,JHEP07(2014) 011 [1401.1426]

work page arXiv 2014
[11]

Bzowski, P

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Scalar 3-point functions in CFT: renormalisation, beta functions and anomalies,JHEP03(2016) 066 [1510.08442]

work page arXiv 2016
[12]

Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT,JHEP11(2018) 153 [1711.09105]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[13]

Bzowski, P

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Renormalised CFT 3-point functions of scalars, currents and stress tensors,JHEP11(2018) 159 [1805.12100]

work page arXiv 2018
[14]

Farrow, A.E

J.A. Farrow, A.E. Lipstein and P. McFadden,Double copy structure of CFT correlators, JHEP02(2019) 130 [1812.11129]

work page arXiv 2019
[15]

Isono, T

H. Isono, T. Noumi and T. Takeuchi,Momentum space conformal three-point functions of conserved currents and a general spinning operator,JHEP05(2019) 057 [1903.01110]

work page arXiv 2019
[16]

Bautista and H

T. Bautista and H. Godazgar,Lorentzian CFT 3-point functions in momentum space,JHEP 01(2020) 142 [1908.04733]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

Gillioz,Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space, Commun

M. Gillioz,Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space, Commun. Math. Phys.379(2020) 227 [1909.00878]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

Baumann, C

D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel,The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,JHEP12(2020) 204 [1910.14051]

work page arXiv 2020
[19]

Baumann, C

D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel,The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization,SciPost Phys.11 (2021) 071 [2005.04234]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Jain, R.R

S. Jain, R.R. John and V. Malvimat,Momentum space spinning correlators and higher spin equations in three dimensions,JHEP11(2020) 049 [2005.07212]. – 32 –

work page arXiv 2020
[21]

Jain, R.R

S. Jain, R.R. John and V. Malvimat,Constraining momentum space correlators using slightly broken higher spin symmetry,JHEP04(2021) 231 [2008.08610]

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

Jain, R.R

S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta, A.A. Nizami and A. Suresh,Momentum space parity-odd CFT 3-point functions,JHEP08(2021) 089 [2101.11635]

work page arXiv 2021
[23]

Jain, R.R

S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta, A.A. Nizami and A. Suresh,Double copy structure of parity-violating CFT correlators,JHEP07(2021) 033 [2104.12803]

work page arXiv 2021
[24]

Jain, R.R

S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta, A.A. Nizami and A. Suresh,Higher spin 3-point functions in 3d CFT using spinor-helicity variables,JHEP09(2021) 041 [2106.00016]

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

Baumann, W.-M

D. Baumann, W.-M. Chen, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel,Linking the singularities of cosmological correlators,JHEP09(2022) 010 [2106.05294]

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

Jain and R.R

S. Jain and R.R. John,Relation between parity-even and parity-odd CFT correlation functions in three dimensions,JHEP12(2021) 067 [2107.00695]

work page arXiv 2021
[27]

Jain, R.R

S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta and D.K. S,Constraining momentum space CFT correlators with consistent position space OPE limit and the collider bound,JHEP02(2022) 084 [2111.08024]

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Gillioz,Conformal field theory for particle physicists, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer (2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-27086-4, [2207.09474]

M. Gillioz,Conformal field theory for particle physicists, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer (2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-27086-4, [2207.09474]

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27086-4 2023
[29]

Marotta, K

R. Marotta, K. Skenderis and M. Verma,Momentum space CFT correlators of non-conserved spinning operators,JHEP03(2023) 196 [2212.13135]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

A foray on SCFT 3 via super spinor-helicity and Grassmann twistor variables,

S. Jain, D.K. S, D. Mazumdar and S. Yadav,A foray on SCFT 3 via super spinor-helicity and Grassmann twistor variables,JHEP09(2024) 027 [2312.03059]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

Bzowski,Handbook of derivative AdS amplitudes,JHEP04(2024) 082 [2312.11625]

A. Bzowski,Handbook of derivative AdS amplitudes,JHEP04(2024) 082 [2312.11625]

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

D.K. S, D. Mazumdar and S. Yadav,n-point functions in conformal quantum mechanics: a momentum space odyssey,JHEP08(2024) 085 [2402.16947]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,

S. Jain, D.K. S and E. Skvortsov,Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 106017 [2405.00773]

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories,

O. Aharony, R.R. Kalloor and T. Kukolj,A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories, JHEP10(2024) 051 [2405.01647]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Marotta, K

R. Marotta, K. Skenderis and M. Verma,Flat space spinning massive amplitudes from momentum space CFT,JHEP08(2024) 226 [2406.06447]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

Corian´ o and S

C. Corian´ o and S. Lionetti,CFT constraints on parity-odd interactions with axions and dilatons,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 125008 [2408.02580]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

Gillioz,The momentum-space conformal bootstrap in 2d,2502.21227

M. Gillioz,The momentum-space conformal bootstrap in 2d,2502.21227

work page arXiv
[38]

S,Lectures on the Spinor and Twistor Formalism in 3D Conformal Field Theory, 2508.21633

D.K. S,Lectures on the Spinor and Twistor Formalism in 3D Conformal Field Theory, 2508.21633

work page arXiv
[39]

Baumann, G

D. Baumann, G. Mathys, G.L. Pimentel and F. Rost,A new twist on spinning (A)dS correlators,JHEP01(2025) 202 [2408.02727]

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

A. Bala, S. Jain, D.K. S., D. Mazumdar and V. Singh,3D conformal field theory in twistor space,JHEP12(2025) 120 [2502.18562]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

A. Bala, S. Jain, D.K. S., D. Mazumdar, V. Singh and B. Thakkar,A Supertwistor Formalism forN= 1,2,3,4SCFT 3 accepted for publication in JHEP,2503.19970. – 33 –

work page arXiv
[42]

Bala and D.K

A. Bala and D.K. S,An Ode to the Penrose and Witten transforms in twistor space for 3D CFT,JHEP11(2025) 056 [2505.14082]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Rost,A novel language for spinning (A)dS correlators, Ph.D

F.E. Rost,A novel language for spinning (A)dS correlators, Ph.D. thesis, 2025

2025
[44]

Mazumdar,Super-Penrose & Witten transforms for SCFT 3,JHEP12(2025) 041 [2508.02672]

D. Mazumdar,Super-Penrose & Witten transforms for SCFT 3,JHEP12(2025) 041 [2508.02672]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Carrillo Gonz´ alez and T

M. Carrillo Gonz´ alez and T. Keseman,Spinning boundary correlators from (A)dS 4 twistors, JHEP03(2026) 131 [2510.00096]

work page arXiv 2026
[46]

Ansari, S

A. Ansari, S. Jain and D.K. S,AdS 4 Boundary Wightman functions in Twistor Space: Factorization, Conformal blocks and a Double Copy,2512.04172

work page arXiv
[47]

The Cosmological Grassmannian,

M. Arundine, D. Baumann, M.H.G. Lee, G.L. Pimentel and F. Rost,The Cosmological Grassmannian,2602.07117

work page arXiv
[48]

Scattering Amplitudes,

H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang,Scattering Amplitudes,1308.1697

work page arXiv
[49]

Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,

E. Witten,Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,Commun. Math. Phys.252(2004) 189 [hep-th/0312171]

work page arXiv 2004
[50]

Arkani-Hamed, J.L

N. Arkani-Hamed, J.L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A.B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov and J. Trnka, Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes, Cambridge University Press (4, 2016), 10.1017/CBO9781316091548, [1212.5605]

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781316091548 2016
[51]

Elvang, Y.-t

H. Elvang, Y.-t. Huang and C. Peng,On-shell superamplitudes in N<4 SYM,JHEP09 (2011) 031 [1102.4843]

work page arXiv 2011
[52]

A. Bala, S. Jain, D. K.S and A.R. Adithya,Super-Grassmannians forN= 2to4SCFT 3: From AdS4 Correlators toN= 4SYM scattering Amplitudes,To appear(2026)

2026
[53]

Fermionic Boundary Correlators in (EA)dS space,

W.-M. Chen, Y.-t. Huang, Z.-X. Huang and Y. Liu,Fermionic Boundary Correlators in (EA)dS space,2512.22097

work page arXiv
[54]

Flat space Fermionic Wave-function coefficients,

B.-T. Chen, W.-M. Chen, Y.-t. Huang, Z.-X. Huang and Y. Liu,Flat space Fermionic Wave-function coefficients,2512.22092

work page arXiv
[55]

Huang, C

Y.-t. Huang, C. Wen and D. Xie,The Positive orthogonal Grassmannian and loop amplitudes of ABJM,J. Phys. A47(2014) 474008 [1402.1479]

work page arXiv 2014
[56]

Huang and C

Y.-T. Huang and C. Wen,ABJM amplitudes and the positive orthogonal grassmannian, JHEP02(2014) 104 [1309.3252]

work page arXiv 2014
[57]

Kim and S

J. Kim and S. Lee,Positroid Stratification of Orthogonal Grassmannian and ABJM Amplitudes,JHEP09(2014) 085 [1402.1119]

work page arXiv 2014
[58]

The Vasiliev Grassmannian,

S. De and H. Lee,The Vasiliev Grassmannian,2603.24656

work page arXiv
[59]

Li,Bootstrapping conformal four-point correlators with slightly broken higher spin symmetry and3Dbosonization,JHEP10(2020) 007 [1906.05834]

Z. Li,Bootstrapping conformal four-point correlators with slightly broken higher spin symmetry and3Dbosonization,JHEP10(2020) 007 [1906.05834]

work page arXiv 2020
[60]

P. Jain, S. Jain, B. Sahoo, K.S. Dhruva and A. Zade,Mapping Large N Slightly Broken Higher Spin (SBHS) theory correlators to free theory correlators,JHEP12(2023) 173 [2207.05101]

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

Jain and D.K

S. Jain and D.K. S,A spin on the bulk locality of Slightly Broken Higher Spin theories,JHEP 12(2024) 048 [2308.04490]

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

Towards the higher point holographic momentum space amplitudes,

S. Albayrak and S. Kharel,Towards the higher point holographic momentum space amplitudes,JHEP02(2019) 040 [1810.12459]. – 34 –

work page arXiv 2019
[63]

Towards the higher point holographic momentum space amplitudes. Part II. Gravitons,

S. Albayrak and S. Kharel,Towards the higher point holographic momentum space amplitudes. Part II. Gravitons,JHEP12(2019) 135 [1908.01835]

work page arXiv 2019
[64]

Jepsen and S

C.B. Jepsen and S. Parikh,Propagator identities, holographic conformal blocks, and higher-point AdS diagrams,JHEP10(2019) 268 [1906.08405]

work page arXiv 2019
[65]

Mason and D

L.J. Mason and D. Skinner,Scattering Amplitudes and BCFW Recursion in Twistor Space, JHEP01(2010) 064 [0903.2083]

work page arXiv 2010
[66]

Arkani-Hamed, F

N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung and J. Kaplan,The S-Matrix in Twistor Space, JHEP03(2010) 110 [0903.2110]

work page arXiv 2010
[67]

Alday, V

L.F. Alday, V. Gon¸ calves and X. Zhou,Supersymmetric Five-Point Gluon Amplitudes in AdS Space,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 161601 [2201.04422]

work page arXiv 2022
[68]

Alday and T

L.F. Alday and T. Hansen,The AdS Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude,JHEP10(2023) 023 [2306.12786]. – 35 –

work page arXiv 2023