arxiv: 2604.07498 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Recognition: unknown

Hydrolyzed Hazes on Water-rich Exoplanets: Optical Constants and Detectability

Cara Pesciotta , Sarah M. H\"orst , Michael J. Radke , Sarah E. Moran , Chao He , V\'eronique Vuitton

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP

keywords exoplanet atmospheresphotochemical hazeshydrolysisoptical constantssub-Neptunessynthetic spectrawater-rich atmosphereshaze evolution

0 comments

The pith

Hydrolyzed hazes in water-rich exoplanet atmospheres increase in absorptivity and flatten gaseous spectral features.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs laboratory hydrolysis experiments on haze analogs formed under conditions typical of temperate water-rich exoplanets. Transmittance measurements across 0.4 to 28.5 micrometers show shifts in functional groups and a broad rise in overall absorbance. Optical constants extracted from these data are then inserted into synthetic atmospheric models, where the resulting high imaginary refractive index nearly erases molecular absorption bands. This outcome matters because many current interpretations of sub-Neptune spectra assume hazes retain their original properties after formation, which could lead to incorrect inferences about atmospheric composition and habitability.

Core claim

Hydrolysis experiments on haze analogs of temperate water-rich exoplanets produce measurable changes in chemical functional groups and an overall increase in sample absorbance from 0.4 to 28.5 micrometers. The derived optical constants exhibit elevated imaginary refractive indices. When these constants are used in synthetic spectra of water-rich sub-Neptune atmospheres, gaseous absorption features are almost completely flattened, demonstrating that haze optical properties must reflect post-formation water interactions to match expected planetary conditions.

What carries the argument

Optical constants derived from transmittance measurements on hydrolyzed haze analogs, which quantify the rise in absorptivity caused by water-driven chemical alteration.

If this is right

Atmospheric models of water-rich sub-Neptunes require haze optical constants that incorporate hydrolysis to avoid misidentifying molecular species.
The high imaginary refractive index after hydrolysis produces near-total flattening of spectral features across visible and infrared wavelengths.
Observational campaigns targeting gaseous signatures on these planets must account for evolved haze opacity to correctly interpret data.
Prebiotic chemistry assessments from haze composition become more uncertain once hydrolysis alters the original material.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Earlier models that omit hydrolysis may have overestimated the detectability of key molecules such as water vapor.
Extending similar hydrolysis tests to other haze-formation chemistries could reveal whether flattening is a general feature of water-rich worlds.
Future telescope observations might need wavelength-specific corrections for haze evolution when retrieving atmospheric properties.

Load-bearing premise

Laboratory haze analogs produced under chosen conditions and exposed to specific hydrolysis steps accurately represent the composition and water interactions of hazes in actual temperate water-rich exoplanet atmospheres.

What would settle it

Spectra of a water-rich sub-Neptune that display clear, un-flattened gaseous absorption bands at wavelengths where the hydrolyzed-haze models predict near-total opacity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07498 by Cara Pesciotta, Chao He, Michael J. Radke, Sarah E. Moran, Sarah M. H\"orst, V\'eronique Vuitton.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Simplified schematic of the experimental setup. The 1000x solar metallicity gas mixtures are heated to their respective temperatures and flowed through the PHAZER reaction chamber. The collected powder is mixed with water; gray panels display images of the hydrolysis solutions before and after three weeks, demonstrating chemical evolution by eye. The solutions are then separated into insoluble and soluble … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Transmittance spectra of the insoluble (pellet concentrations ∼0.5%) and soluble (∼0.1%) portions of hydrolyzed haze analogs, and the unhydrolyzed (0.38% and 0.44%) sample for comparison. Left panels are the full spectral range, and right panels are the mid-IR range. Top: 300 K water-rich exoplanet; Bottom: 400 K water-rich exoplanet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Optical constants (top: k, imaginary refractive indices; bottom: n, real refractive indices) of the insoluble and soluble portions of hydrolyzed hazes, along with the unhydrolyzed haze for comparison. Left: 300 K water-rich exoplanet; Right: 400 K water-rich exoplanet. The optical constants of hydrolyzed water-rich hazes are available as the Data behind the Figure. the need for such increased atmospheric m… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Model transmission spectra comparing several haze compositions on a GJ 1214b-like planet with a temperate waterrich atmosphere. We model a clear atmosphere as well as atmospheres with Titan-like hazes, water-rich exoplanet hazes, and the insoluble and soluble fractions of water-rich exoplanet hazes. Existing Hubble and JWST data of GJ 1214b are also plotted for reference. The top panel displays the full m… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Top: Model reflectance spectra from 0.4 to 1.0 µm comparing several haze compositions on a GJ 1214b-like planet with a temperate water-rich atmosphere. We model a clear atmosphere as well as atmospheres with Titan-like hazes, waterrich exoplanet hazes, and the insoluble and soluble fractions of water-rich exoplanet hazes. Bottom: The main forcing model parameters (single-scattering albedo, left; extinctio… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Optical constants for the insoluble fraction of the 300 K hydrolyzed haze analog derived under various assumptions. Left: n and k derived from particle densities (ρ) spanning 0.5 to 2 g cm−3 . Middle: n derived using anchor points n0 from 1.56 to 1.64. Right: n derived from differing assumptions for k outside of the measured wavelength range. The optical constants derivation employed in this study makes se… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Observations of temperate sub-Neptunes suggest active chemical environments, finding evidence of both water vapor and photochemical hazes in their atmospheres. Hazes formed in water-rich atmospheres are chemically complex, containing molecules relevant to prebiotic chemistry, and their strong optical opacity obscures sought-after gaseous molecular absorption features. While many studies have investigated haze formation and properties across diverse atmospheric conditions, little is known about the evolution of these hazes in their environment once formed. In particular, interactions with water can drive hydrolysis reactions that alter haze composition and optical behavior, affecting our interpretations of habitability and observational spectroscopy. Here, we perform hydrolysis experiments on haze analogs of temperate water-rich exoplanets and measure their optical properties. Transmittance measurements from 0.4 to 28.5 $\mu$m reveal changes in key functional groups after hydrolysis, along with an overall increase in sample absorbance. We report the derived optical constants for use in observational and modeling studies. Through synthetic atmospheric spectra, we demonstrate the need for physically informed haze optical properties in models, consistent with expected planetary conditions. The increased absorptivity and high imaginary refractive index of hydrolyzed hazes almost completely flatten features in model spectra, presenting critical consequences for atmospheric characterization of water-rich sub-Neptunes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives the first optical constants for hydrolyzed haze analogs under water-rich conditions and shows they can flatten sub-Neptune spectra, but the lab-to-planet link is the weakest part.

read the letter

The paper supplies the first optical constants derived from haze analogs that were hydrolyzed under conditions meant to mimic water-rich temperate sub-Neptunes. It also shows that these processed hazes have higher absorptivity, which nearly erases gaseous absorption features in the synthetic spectra they generate. They started with haze analogs formed in relevant gas mixtures, then subjected them to hydrolysis, and recorded transmittance spectra from 0.4 to 28.5 micrometers. The data show shifts in functional groups and a clear rise in overall absorbance. From that they extracted refractive indices and ran atmospheric models to demonstrate the flattening effect. This is useful new input for anyone modeling or observing these planets, since prior studies had not included the hydrolysis step in the optical properties. The transmittance measurements appear straightforward and the before-and-after comparison is convincing. The synthetic spectra drive home why updated constants matter for interpretation. The soft spot is the connection to actual planetary atmospheres. The hydrolysis was done on already-formed particles exposed to water in the lab, whereas on a sub-Neptune the hazes would form and evolve in place under ongoing photochemistry, specific temperature and pressure gradients, and continuous gas interactions. The paper does not show that the same degree of change would happen under those more dynamic conditions, so the constants are best treated as an illustrative case until more work bridges the gap. The methods for turning transmittance into optical constants are not fully detailed here, which leaves uncertainties about error propagation and sample uniformity unclear. This is worth the time of modelers who need haze properties for water-rich worlds. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports laboratory hydrolysis experiments on photochemical haze analogs produced under conditions relevant to temperate water-rich exoplanets. Transmittance spectra from 0.4 to 28.5 μm show changes in functional groups and increased absorbance after hydrolysis. Optical constants are derived and used in synthetic atmospheric spectra to demonstrate that hydrolyzed hazes cause significant flattening of molecular absorption features, with implications for the characterization of sub-Neptune atmospheres.

Significance. If the laboratory analogs accurately represent planetary hazes, the results provide important optical constants that highlight how haze evolution through hydrolysis can obscure atmospheric features, affecting our ability to detect gases and assess habitability on water-rich exoplanets. The work includes direct measurements and forward modeling, strengthening its utility for the community.

major comments (2)

[Methods (optical constants derivation)] The procedure for deriving the complex refractive index from transmittance measurements is not described in sufficient detail. For example, it is unclear how the film thickness is determined, how multiple reflections are accounted for, and how uncertainties are propagated. Since the high imaginary refractive index is key to the flattening effect in the synthetic spectra, this detail is necessary to assess the robustness of the constants.
[§5 (synthetic spectra and discussion)] The application of the derived optical constants to model spectra assumes that the lab hydrolysis conditions (exposure to water vapor or liquid) mimic the interactions in a planetary atmosphere. However, no quantitative comparison is provided to expected hydrolysis rates under sub-Neptune temperature-pressure profiles or UV irradiation. This representativeness is load-bearing for the claim of 'critical consequences for atmospheric characterization'.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract mentions 'synthetic atmospheric spectra' but does not specify the atmospheric model parameters used (e.g., temperature profile, haze distribution).
[Figure captions] Ensure all figures have clear labels for pre- and post-hydrolysis data to aid comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address each major comment below with specific plans for revision where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Methods (optical constants derivation)] The procedure for deriving the complex refractive index from transmittance measurements is not described in sufficient detail. For example, it is unclear how the film thickness is determined, how multiple reflections are accounted for, and how uncertainties are propagated. Since the high imaginary refractive index is key to the flattening effect in the synthetic spectra, this detail is necessary to assess the robustness of the constants.

Authors: We agree that the derivation procedure requires more detail for reproducibility and to allow assessment of the high imaginary refractive index. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the Methods section to explicitly describe film thickness determination (via profilometry cross-checked with interference fringe analysis), the treatment of multiple reflections (using a thin-film transfer matrix approach), and uncertainty propagation (via Monte Carlo sampling of measurement noise and thickness errors). These additions will directly support the robustness of the reported optical constants. revision: yes
Referee: [§5 (synthetic spectra and discussion)] The application of the derived optical constants to model spectra assumes that the lab hydrolysis conditions (exposure to water vapor or liquid) mimic the interactions in a planetary atmosphere. However, no quantitative comparison is provided to expected hydrolysis rates under sub-Neptune temperature-pressure profiles or UV irradiation. This representativeness is load-bearing for the claim of 'critical consequences for atmospheric characterization'.

Authors: We acknowledge the value of a quantitative link to planetary conditions. Our experiments used water exposure levels chosen to represent the high water abundances expected in temperate sub-Neptunes, but we did not include explicit rate modeling. In revision, we will add to §5 order-of-magnitude hydrolysis timescale estimates drawn from published sub-Neptune water vapor abundances, temperatures, and UV fluxes, comparing them to laboratory exposure durations. We will also clarify the limitations of the proxy and adjust the discussion language to avoid overstatement while retaining the demonstrated impact on spectral flattening. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical lab measurements drive all claims

full rationale

The paper reports laboratory hydrolysis experiments on haze analogs, transmittance measurements from 0.4-28.5 μm, derivation of optical constants (n, k) from those data, and forward modeling of synthetic spectra using the measured constants. No step equates a prediction to its own inputs by construction, invokes a self-citation as a uniqueness theorem, or renames a known result. The flattening effect in models follows directly from the higher imaginary index measured post-hydrolysis; the chain is externally anchored in lab data rather than self-referential.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the laboratory analogs faithfully representing planetary hazes and on the hydrolysis protocol matching atmospheric water interactions; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Laboratory haze analogs formed under specific conditions represent the composition and structure of hazes in temperate water-rich exoplanet atmospheres
The paper uses these analogs to proxy real atmospheric particles whose optical behavior is then measured after hydrolysis.
domain assumption The hydrolysis experimental conditions reproduce the chemical interactions between hazes and water expected in planetary atmospheres
Changes in functional groups and absorbance are attributed to planetary-relevant hydrolysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1382 out tokens · 64338 ms · 2026-05-10T17:22:50.889651+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

[1]

Adams, D., Gao, P., de Pater, I., & Morley, C. V. 2019, ApJ, 874, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab074c

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab074c 2019
[2]

, archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

Adams, E. R., Seager, S., & Elkins-Tanton, L. 2008, ApJ, 673, 1160, doi: 10.1086/524925

work page doi:10.1086/524925 2008
[3]

D., Meadows, V

Arney, G., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Meadows, V. S., et al. 2016, Astrobiology, 16, 873, doi: 10.1089/ast.2015.1422

work page doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1422 2016
[4]

P., Bendek, E., Monacelli, B., et al

Bailey, V. P., Bendek, E., Monacelli, B., et al. 2023, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12680, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 126800T, doi: 10.1117/12.2679036

work page doi:10.1117/12.2679036 2023
[5]

S., et al

Basilicata, M., Giacobbe, P., Bonomo, A. S., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347659

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347659 2024
[6]

2020, Resampled Opacity Database for PICASO v2, 1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3759675

Batalha, N., Freedman, R., Lupu, R., & Marley, M. 2020, Resampled Opacity Database for PICASO v2, 1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3759675

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3759675 2020
[7]

E., Marley, M

Batalha, N. E., Marley, M. S., Lewis, N. K., & Fortney, J. J. 2019, ApJ, 878, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b51

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b51 2019
[8]

E., Rooney, C

Batalha, N. E., Rooney, C. M., Visscher, C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.15102, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.15102

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.15102 2025
[9]

G., Welbanks, L., Schlawin, E., et al

Beatty, T. G., Welbanks, L., Schlawin, E., et al. 2024, ApJL, 970, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad55e9

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad55e9 2024
[10]

Nature Astronomy , keywords =

Benneke, B., Knutson, H. A., Lothringer, J., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 813, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0800-5

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0800-5 2019
[11]

2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab59dc

Benneke, B., Wong, I., Piaulet, C., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab59dc

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab59dc 2019
[12]

2024, JWST Reveals CH$ 4$, CO$ 2$, and H$ 2$O in a Metal-rich Miscible Atmosphere on a Two-Earth-Radius Exoplanet, arXiv

Benneke, B., Roy, P.-A., Coulombe, L.-P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.03325, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.03325

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.03325 2024
[13]

Brande, J., Crossfield, I. J. M., Kreidberg, L., et al. 2024, ApJL, 961, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1b5c Brass´ e, C., Mu˜ noz, O., Coll, P., & Raulin, F. 2015, Planet. Space Sci., 109, 159, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2015.02.012

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad1b5c 2024
[14]

E., Roberts, J

Brown, M. E., Roberts, J. E., & Schaller, E. L. 2010, Icarus, 205, 571, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.08.024

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.08.024 2010
[15]

L., H¨ orst, S

Cable, M. L., H¨ orst, S. M., Hodyss, R., et al. 2012, Chemical Reviews, 112, 1882, doi: 10.1021/cr200221x

work page doi:10.1021/cr200221x 2012
[16]

A., Gao, P., et al

Chachan, Y., Knutson, H. A., Gao, P., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 244, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab4e9a

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab4e9a 2019
[17]

2015, ApJL, 813, L1, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/L1

Arney, G. 2015, ApJL, 813, L1, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/L1

work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/l1 2015
[18]

J., Neish, C., Callahan, M

Cleaves, H. J., Neish, C., Callahan, M. P., et al. 2014, Icarus, 237, 182, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.04.042

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.04.042 2014
[19]

J., & Kempton, E

Corrales, L., Gavilan, L., Teal, D. J., & Kempton, E. M. R. 2023, ApJL, 943, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acaf86

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acaf86 2023
[20]

A., et al

Dragomir, D., Benneke, B., Pearson, K. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/102

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/2/102 2015
[21]

2024, A&A, 682, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346820

Drant, T., Garcia-Caurel, E., Perrin, Z., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346820

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346820 2024
[22]

R., & Roudier, G

Estrela, R., Swain, M. R., & Roudier, G. M. 2022, ApJL, 941, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca2aa

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aca2aa 2022
[23]

2014, Nature, 513, 526, doi: 10.1038/nature13785

Fraine, J., Deming, D., Benneke, B., et al. 2014, Nature, 513, 526, doi: 10.1038/nature13785

work page doi:10.1038/nature13785 2014
[24]

J., Petigura, E

Fulton, B. J., Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa80eb 2017
[25]

Lewis, N. K. 2017, AJ, 153, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5fab

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa5fab 2017
[26]

R., Moran, S

Gao, P., Wakeford, H. R., Moran, S. E., & Parmentier, V. 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 126, e2020JE006655, doi: 10.1029/2020JE006655

work page doi:10.1029/2020je006655 2021
[27]

2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1114-3

Gao, P., Thorngren, D., Lee, G., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1114-3

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1114-3 2020
[28]

Gao, P., Piette, A. A. A., Steinrueck, M. E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd16f

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd16f 2023
[29]

C., & Mason, N

Gavilan, L., Carrasco, N., Vrønning Hoffmann, S., Jones, N. C., & Mason, N. J. 2018, ApJ, 861, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac8df Goodis Gordon, K. E., Karalidi, T., Bott, K. M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc09c

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac8df 2018
[30]

Gordon, S., & McBride, B. J. 1994, Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications. Part 1: Analysis, NASA Reference Publication 1311, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

1994
[31]

E., Wogan, N., et al

Gressier, A., Batalha, N. E., Wogan, N., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.16082, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.16082

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.16082 2025
[32]

M., Radke, M., & Yant, M

He, C., H¨ orst, S. M., Radke, M., & Yant, M. 2022, ??jnlPSJ, 3, 25, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ac4793

work page doi:10.3847/psj/ac4793 2022
[33]

M., Riemer, S., et al

He, C., H¨ orst, S. M., Riemer, S., et al. 2017, ApJL, 841, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa74cc

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa74cc 2017
[34]

M., Lewis, N

He, C., H¨ orst, S. M., Lewis, N. K., et al. 2018, ApJL, 856, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab42b

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab42b 2018
[35]

E., et al

He, C., Radke, M., Moran, S. E., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 182, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02140-4 H¨ orst, S. M., & Tolbert, M. A. 2013, ApJL, 770, L10, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/770/1/L10 H¨ orst, S. M., Yelle, R. V., Buch, A., et al. 2012, Astrobiology, 12, 809, doi: 10.1089/ast.2011.0623 H¨ orst, S. M., He, C., Lewis, N. K., et al. 2018, Nature Astr...

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02140-4 2024
[36]

2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.16798, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.16798

Hu, R., Min, M., Millar-Blanchaer, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.16798, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.16798

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.16798 2025
[37]

P., Khare, B

Imanaka, H., Cruikshank, D. P., Khare, B. N., & McKay, C. P. 2012, Icarus, 218, 247, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.11.018

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.11.018 2012
[38]

2018, ApJ, 853, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa0c5

Kawashima, Y., & Ikoma, M. 2018, ApJ, 853, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa0c5

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa0c5 2018
[39]

Kempton, E. M. R., Zhang, M., Bean, J. L., et al. 2023, Nature, 620, 67, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06159-5

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06159-5 2023
[40]

N., Sagan, C., Arakawa, E

Khare, B. N., Sagan, C., Arakawa, E. T., et al. 1984, Icarus, 60, 127, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(84)90142-8

work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90142-8 1984
[41]

, keywords =

Knutson, H. A., Benneke, B., Deming, D., & Homeier, D. 2014a, Nature, 505, 66, doi: 10.1038/nature12887

work page doi:10.1038/nature12887
[42]

A., Dragomir, D., Kreidberg, L., et al

Knutson, H. A., Dragomir, D., Kreidberg, L., et al. 2014b, ApJ, 794, 155, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/155

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/155
[43]

D., Fauchez, T

Komacek, T. D., Fauchez, T. J., Wolf, E. T., & Abbot, D. S. 2020, ApJL, 888, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab6200

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab6200 2020
[44]

, keywords =

Kreidberg, L., Bean, J. L., D´ esert, J.-M., et al. 2014, Nature, 505, 69, doi: 10.1038/nature12888 K¨ ohler, H. 1936, Trans. Faraday Soc., 32, 1152, doi: 10.1039/TF9363201152

work page doi:10.1038/nature12888 2014
[45]

2021, MNRAS, 502, 5643, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab456

Lavvas, P., & Arfaux, A. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 5643, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab456

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab456 2021
[46]

2011, Icarus, 215, 732, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.06.040

Lavvas, P., Griffith, C., & Yelle, R. 2011, Icarus, 215, 732, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.06.040

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.06.040 2011
[47]

V., & Vuitton, V

Lavvas, P., Yelle, R. V., & Vuitton, V. 2009, Icarus, 201, 626, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.01.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.01.004 2009
[48]

2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.07161, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.07161

Li, H., He, C., Wang, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.07161, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.07161

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.07161 2025
[49]

D., & Morley, C

Loftus, K., Wordsworth, R. D., & Morley, C. V. 2019, ApJ, 887, 231, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab58cc

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab58cc 2019
[50]

AJ155(2), 66 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aaa008 arXiv:1801.00412 [astro-ph.EP]

Lothringer, J. D., Benneke, B., Crossfield, I. J. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaa008

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa008 2018
[51]

2022, Science, 377, 1211, doi: 10.1126/science.abl7164

Luque, R., & Pall´ e, E. 2022, Science, 377, 1211, doi: 10.1126/science.abl7164

work page doi:10.1126/science.abl7164 2022
[52]

N., Yu, X., Glein, C

Luu, C. N., Yu, X., Glein, C. R., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L51, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad9eb1

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9eb1 2024
[53]

2023b, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 956, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf577

Madhusudhan, N., Sarkar, S., Constantinou, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 956, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf577

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf577 2023
[54]

S., Eastman, J

Mahajan, A. S., Eastman, J. D., & Kirk, J. 2024, ApJL, 963, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad29f3

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad29f3 2024
[55]

P., et al

Maillard, J., Carrasco, N., R¨ uger, C. P., et al. 2023, Astrobiology, 23, 723, doi: 10.1089/ast.2022.0021

work page doi:10.1089/ast.2022.0021 2023
[56]

Y., Banerjee, R., Pudritz, R

Marley, M. S., Ackerman, A. S., Cuzzi, J. N., & Kitzmann, D. 2013, in Comparative Climatology of Terrestrial Planets, ed. S. J. Mackwell, A. A. Simon-Miller, J. W. Harder, & M. A. Bullock, 367–392, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816530595-ch015

work page doi:10.2458/azu 2013
[57]

B., Hansen, G

McCord, T. B., Hansen, G. B., Buratti, B. J., et al. 2006, Planet. Space Sci., 54, 1524, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2006.06.007

work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2006.06.007 2006
[58]

Charlson, R. J. 2002, Tellus Series B Chemical and Physical Meteorology B, 54, 74, doi: 10.3402/tellusb.v54i1.16649

work page doi:10.3402/tellusb.v54i1.16649 2002
[59]

E., H¨ orst, S

Moran, S. E., H¨ orst, S. M., Vuitton, V., et al. 2020, ??jnlPSJ, 1, 17, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ab8eae

work page doi:10.3847/psj/ab8eae 2020
[60]

, keywords =

Morley, C. V., Fortney, J. J., Kempton, E. M. R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 33, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/33

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/1/33 2013
[61]

V., Fortney, J

Morley, C. V., Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 110, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/110

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/110 2015
[62]

I., Line, M

Moses, J. I., Line, M. R., Visscher, C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 34, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/34

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/1/34 2013
[63]

D., Lorenz, R

Neish, C. D., Lorenz, R. D., O’Brien, D. P., & Null, . 2006, International Journal of Astrobiology, 5, 57, doi: 10.1017/S1473550406002898

work page doi:10.1017/s1473550406002898 2006
[64]

Smith, M. A. 2008, Astrobiology, 8, 273, doi: 10.1089/ast.2007.0193

work page doi:10.1089/ast.2007.0193 2008
[65]

1987, Journal of Physics E Scientific Instruments, 20, 894, doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/20/7/015

Neri, F., Saitta, G., & Chiofalo, S. 1987, Journal of Physics E Scientific Instruments, 20, 894, doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/20/7/015

work page doi:10.1088/0022-3735/20/7/015 1987
[66]

C., & Madhusudhan, N

Nixon, M. C., & Madhusudhan, N. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 3414, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1500

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1500 2021
[67]

J., et al

Ohno, K., Schlawin, E., Bell, T. J., et al. 2025, ApJL, 979, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada02c

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ada02c 2025
[68]

1988, Applied Spectroscopy, 42, 952, doi: 10.1366/0003702884430380

Ohta, K., & Ishida, H. 1988, Applied Spectroscopy, 42, 952, doi: 10.1366/0003702884430380

work page doi:10.1366/0003702884430380 1988
[69]

Pearce, B. K. D., He, C., & H¨ orst, S. M. 2022, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 6, 2385, doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00138

work page doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00138 2022
[70]

I., & Raulin, F

Poch, O., Coll, P., Buch, A., Ram´ ırez, S. I., & Raulin, F. 2012, Planet. Space Sci., 61, 114, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2011.04.009 Ram´ ırez, S. I., Coll, P., Buch, A., et al. 2010, Faraday Discussions, 147, 419, doi: 10.1039/c003925j

work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2011.04.009 2012
[71]

Rao, C. N. R. 1975, Ultra-violet and visible spectroscopy: chemical applications (Butterworths, London), 242

1975
[72]

M., & Pandis, S

Raymond, T. M., & Pandis, S. N. 2002, Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres), 107, 4787, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002159

work page doi:10.1029/2002jd002159 2002
[73]

C., Simon-Miller, A

Reuter, D. C., Simon-Miller, A. A., Lunsford, A., et al. 2007, Science, 318, 223, doi: 10.1126/science.1147618 S´ anchez-Lavega, A., Irwin, P., & Garc´ ıa Mu˜ noz, A. 2023, A&A Rv, 31, 5, doi: 10.1007/s00159-023-00150-9

work page doi:10.1126/science.1147618 2007
[74]

J., et al

Schlawin, E., Ohno, K., Bell, T. J., et al. 2024, ApJL, 974, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7fef 17

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7fef 2024
[75]

P., MacDonald, R

Schmidt, S. P., MacDonald, R. J., Tsai, S.-M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.18477, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.18477

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.18477 2025
[76]

Hud, N. V. 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 143, 9279, doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c13081

work page doi:10.1021/jacs.0c13081 2021
[77]

2013, Science, 340, 577, doi: 10.1126/science.1232226

Seager, S. 2013, Science, 340, 577, doi: 10.1126/science.1232226

work page doi:10.1126/science.1232226 2013
[78]

M., Webster, F

Silverstein, R. M., Webster, F. X., Kiemle, D. J., & Bryce, D. L. 2017, Spectrometric identification of Organic Compounds, 8th edn. (Wiley)

2017
[79]

The Astrophysical Journal , author =

Steinrueck, M. E., Parmentier, V., Kreidberg, L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc99a

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc99a 2025
[80]

V., Ignatiev, N

Titov, D. V., Ignatiev, N. I., McGouldrick, K., Wilquet, V., & Wilson, C. F. 2018, SSRv, 214, 126, doi: 10.1007/s11214-018-0552-z

work page doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0552-z 2018

Showing first 80 references.