pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07503 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Super-Grassmannians for mathcal{N}=2 to 4 SCFT₃: From AdS₄ Correlators to mathcal{N}=4 SYM scattering Amplitudes

Aswini Bala , Sachin Jain , Dhruva K.S. , Adithya A Rao
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords Super-GrassmannianSCFT3AdS4 correlatorsN=4 SYM amplitudessuperconformal symmetryR-symmetryflat-space limitoperator delta functions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Super-Grassmannians encode superconformal and R-symmetry constraints as operator-valued delta functions for n-point functions in N=2 to 4 SCFT3, with the N=4 version reducing directly to flat-space SYM amplitudes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a Super-Grassmannian to describe n-point functions in three-dimensional superconformal field theories with two to four supersymmetries. Superconformal invariance and R-symmetry appear directly as operator-valued delta functions instead of separate Ward identities. The formalism is tested on AdS4 super Yang-Mills theories. In the N=2 case it recovers the four-gluon correlator from the scalar four-point function. In the N=4 case two super-operator constructions are given; the CPT-self-conjugate version contains only spins zero, one-half and one and reproduces known N=4 SYM scattering amplitudes in the flat-space limit, while R-symmetry enlarges from SO(N) to SU(N).

Core claim

We construct a Super-Grassmannian for n-point functions in N=2 to 4 SCFT3. The constraints imposed by super-conformal invariance and R-symmetry are completely manifest in this formalism through (operator-valued) delta functions. We test our formalism in N=2 and N=4 AdS4 super Yang-Mills theories. In the N=2 case, for instance, we reproduce the four-gluon correlator using the four-point scalar correlator as input. For N=4, we construct the super-operator in two distinct ways. In one approach, the super-operator has a lowest component of spin zero and includes all states up to spin two. In the other approach, we build the super-operator in a CPT self-conjugate manner, which contains only the 0

What carries the argument

Super-Grassmannian, a supersymmetric extension of the Grassmannian in which n-point correlators are represented so that superconformal and R-symmetry constraints appear explicitly as operator-valued delta functions.

If this is right

  • The N=2 four-gluon correlator is reproduced from the four-point scalar correlator alone.
  • Two distinct super-operator constructions exist for N=4, one spanning spins zero to two and one CPT-self-conjugate spanning only spins zero, one-half and one.
  • The CPT-self-conjugate construction matches N=4 SYM amplitudes directly in the flat-space limit.
  • R-symmetry enlarges from SO(N) to SU(N) when the AdS radius is sent to infinity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The manifest delta-function structure may allow higher-point AdS4 correlators to be converted systematically into flat-space scattering amplitudes.
  • The same formalism could simplify bootstrap studies of three-dimensional SCFTs by turning symmetry constraints into algebraic delta-function conditions.
  • The observed R-symmetry enhancement hints at a direct dictionary between curved-space superconformal algebras and their flat-space limits.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen super-operator constructions for N=4 capture the complete spectrum of states and the flat-space limit introduces no uncontrolled normalizations or missing physical content.

What would settle it

Compute the five-point correlator in N=4 AdS4 SYM with the Super-Grassmannian, take the flat-space limit, and check whether the result equals the known five-gluon amplitude in N=4 SYM.

read the original abstract

We construct a Super-Grassmannian for $n-$point functions in $\mathcal{N}=2$ to $4$ SCFT$_3$. The constraints imposed by super-conformal invariance and $R-$symmetry are completely manifest in this formalism through (operator-valued) delta functions. We test our formalism in $\mathcal{N}=2$ and $\mathcal{N}=4$ AdS$_4$ super Yang-Mills theories. In the $\mathcal{N}=2$ case, for instance, we reproduce the four-gluon correlator using the four-point scalar correlator as input. For $\mathcal{N}=4$, we construct the super-operator in two distinct ways. In one approach, the super-operator has a lowest component of spin zero and includes all states up to spin two. In the other approach, we build the super-operator in a CPT self-conjugate manner, which contains only operators with spin zero, spin half, and spin one mimicking flat space $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM super-field constructions. The latter construction is particularly interesting, as it matches directly with the $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM amplitudes in the flat space limit, thereby demonstrating the non-triviality and usefulness of our framework. It is interesting to note that the $R-$symmetry group enhances from $SO(\mathcal{N})$ to $SU(\mathcal{N})$ in the flat space limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a Super-Grassmannian formalism for n-point functions in N=2 to 4 SCFT3, encoding super-conformal invariance and R-symmetry constraints manifestly via operator-valued delta functions. It tests the approach in AdS4 super Yang-Mills: for N=2 it reproduces the four-gluon correlator from a four-point scalar input; for N=4 it presents two super-operator constructions (one with components up to spin 2, one CPT self-conjugate with spins 0, 1/2, 1), claiming the latter matches N=4 SYM amplitudes directly in the flat-space limit while noting an SO(N) to SU(N) R-symmetry enhancement.

Significance. If the delta-function constructions are rigorously defined and the flat-space matching holds without implicit normalizations or truncations, the framework could offer a geometrically transparent method for handling higher-point correlators in SCFT3 and a direct bridge from AdS4 data to flat-space amplitudes. The explicit reproduction of a known N=2 correlator and the claimed non-trivial N=4 match would be notable strengths, particularly if accompanied by machine-checkable or reproducible derivations.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] §4 (N=4 super-operator constructions): the CPT self-conjugate super-operator (spins 0, 1/2, 1) is asserted to match N=4 SYM amplitudes in the flat-space limit, but the manuscript must explicitly verify that the embedding preserves the full relevant spectrum and introduces no hidden rescalings or truncations; without such checks the claimed direct match risks being tautological rather than a non-trivial test.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (N=2 test): the reproduction of the four-gluon correlator from the four-point scalar correlator via the super-Grassmannian deltas is central, yet the derivation should include an explicit step-by-step expansion showing how the operator-valued deltas enforce the gluon structure without additional assumptions on the input scalar correlator.
  3. [§4–5] Flat-space limit procedure (throughout §4–5): the R-symmetry enhancement SO(N)→SU(N) and the mapping of AdS4 correlators to SYM amplitudes require a concrete demonstration that the limit commutes with the delta-function constraints and does not discard states or alter normalizations for general n-point functions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] Notation for operator-valued delta functions should be introduced with a clear definition and example in the opening sections to aid readability.
  2. [§4] Add a brief comparison table or paragraph contrasting the two N=4 super-operator constructions side-by-side, including their component content and R-symmetry properties.
  3. [Introduction] Include references to prior Grassmannian or twistor-like constructions in AdS/CFT or SCFT literature to better situate the novelty of the Super-Grassmannian.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, making revisions where necessary to provide the requested explicit verifications and demonstrations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (N=4 super-operator constructions): the CPT self-conjugate super-operator (spins 0, 1/2, 1) is asserted to match N=4 SYM amplitudes in the flat-space limit, but the manuscript must explicitly verify that the embedding preserves the full relevant spectrum and introduces no hidden rescalings or truncations; without such checks the claimed direct match risks being tautological rather than a non-trivial test.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript, we have added a detailed component expansion in §4 and a new appendix comparing the CPT self-conjugate super-operator to the standard N=4 SYM superfield. This shows that all states with spins 0, 1/2, and 1 are included without truncation or omission. Normalizations are fixed uniquely by matching the lowest (scalar) component to the known AdS4 scalar correlator, with no additional rescalings introduced in the construction or the subsequent flat-space limit. The match is non-trivial because the super-Grassmannian delta functions automatically generate the correct amplitude relations from the input data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (N=2 test): the reproduction of the four-gluon correlator from the four-point scalar correlator via the super-Grassmannian deltas is central, yet the derivation should include an explicit step-by-step expansion showing how the operator-valued deltas enforce the gluon structure without additional assumptions on the input scalar correlator.

    Authors: We have expanded §3.2 in the revised version to include the requested step-by-step derivation. Beginning with the four-point scalar correlator as input, we apply the operator-valued delta functions one by one: first the super-conformal deltas that enforce the correct spin and derivative structure, then the R-symmetry deltas that perform the index contractions needed for the gluon polarization vectors. The calculation proceeds without any extra assumptions on the scalar correlator beyond its known form, explicitly yielding the four-gluon correlator. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4–5] Flat-space limit procedure (throughout §4–5): the R-symmetry enhancement SO(N)→SU(N) and the mapping of AdS4 correlators to SYM amplitudes require a concrete demonstration that the limit commutes with the delta-function constraints and does not discard states or alter normalizations for general n-point functions.

    Authors: We have revised §5 to include a general argument for arbitrary n. The delta functions are purely algebraic (operator-valued constraints on the super-Grassmannian coordinates) and independent of the AdS curvature scale; therefore the flat-space limit (AdS radius to infinity) commutes with their action. We demonstrate that the super-operator construction includes the complete spectrum for each n, with no states discarded, by matching the dimension of the representation before and after the limit. Normalizations are preserved because they are fixed at the AdS level by the lowest-component correlator. The SO(N) to SU(N) enhancement arises naturally from the flat-space kinematics, as shown explicitly for the n=4 case and argued to hold generally. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Super-Grassmannian construction for SCFT3 n-point functions is self-contained with independent tests

full rationale

The paper constructs a new Super-Grassmannian formalism in which super-conformal invariance and R-symmetry constraints appear explicitly as operator-valued delta functions. It then applies the formalism to reproduce the known four-gluon correlator in N=2 AdS4 SYM from the scalar correlator input and, for N=4, exhibits two distinct super-operator embeddings whose flat-space limit behavior is compared with N=4 SYM amplitudes. No quoted equation or derivation step reduces the claimed match to a fitted parameter, a self-citation, or a definition that already contains the target amplitudes; the CPT-self-conjugate construction is presented as an alternative embedding whose agreement serves as an external check rather than an input. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of the final amplitudes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard superconformal symmetry and R-symmetry assumptions plus the novel introduction of the Super-Grassmannian structure; no explicit free parameters or invented particles are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Superconformal invariance and R-symmetry impose constraints that can be encoded via operator-valued delta functions in the Super-Grassmannian.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the foundation for the formalism being completely manifest.
invented entities (1)
  • Super-Grassmannian no independent evidence
    purpose: To organize n-point functions in N=2-4 SCFT3 with manifest superconformal and R-symmetry constraints.
    New mathematical object introduced in the paper; no independent evidence provided beyond the claimed tests.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5594 in / 1589 out tokens · 38098 ms · 2026-05-10T17:19:25.996864+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Conformal Grassmannian: A Symplectic Bi-Grassmannian for $CFT_ 4$ Correlators

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new symplectic bi-Grassmannian representation encodes CFT4 Wightman correlators via integrals over mutually symplectically orthogonal n-planes aligned with kinematics, reproducing known 2- and 3-point structures com...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Scattering Amplitudes,

    H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang,Scattering Amplitudes,1308.1697

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Drummond, J

    J.M. Drummond, J. Henn, G.P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev,Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B828 (2010) 317 [0807.1095]

    work page arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Arkani-Hamed, F

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung and J. Kaplan,The S-Matrix in Twistor Space, JHEP03(2010) 110 [0903.2110]

    work page arXiv 2010

  4. [4]

    Arkani-Hamed, F

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung and J. Kaplan,A duality for the s matrix,Journal of High Energy Physics2010(2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,

    J.M. Maldacena and G.L. Pimentel,On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,JHEP 09(2011) 045 [1104.2846]

    work page arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    McFadden and K

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Cosmological 3-point correlators from holography,JCAP06 (2011) 030 [1104.3894]

    work page arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Solving the Conformal Constraints for Scalar Operators in Momentum Space and the Evaluation of Feynman’s Master Integrals,

    C. Coriano, L. Delle Rose, E. Mottola and M. Serino,Solving the Conformal Constraints for Scalar Operators in Momentum Space and the Evaluation of Feynman’s Master Integrals, JHEP07(2013) 011 [1304.6944]

    work page arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Implications of Conformal Invariance in Momentum Space,

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space,JHEP03(2014) 111 [1304.7760]

    work page arXiv 2014

  9. [9]

    Ghosh, N

    A. Ghosh, N. Kundu, S. Raju and S.P. Trivedi,Conformal Invariance and the Four Point Scalar Correlator in Slow-Roll Inflation,JHEP07(2014) 011 [1401.1426]. – 21 –

    work page arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Scalar 3-point functions in CFT: renormalisation, beta functions and anomalies,JHEP03(2016) 066 [1510.08442]

    work page arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT,JHEP11(2018) 153 [1711.09105]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Renormalised CFT 3-point functions of scalars, currents and stress tensors,JHEP11(2018) 159 [1805.12100]

    work page arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Farrow, A.E

    J.A. Farrow, A.E. Lipstein and P. McFadden,Double copy structure of CFT correlators, JHEP02(2019) 130 [1812.11129]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Isono, T

    H. Isono, T. Noumi and T. Takeuchi,Momentum space conformal three-point functions of conserved currents and a general spinning operator,JHEP05(2019) 057 [1903.01110]

    work page arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Bautista and H

    T. Bautista and H. Godazgar,Lorentzian CFT 3-point functions in momentum space,JHEP 01(2020) 142 [1908.04733]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Gillioz,Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space, Commun

    M. Gillioz,Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space, Commun. Math. Phys.379(2020) 227 [1909.00878]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Baumann, C

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel,The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,JHEP12(2020) 204 [1910.14051]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Baumann, C

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel,The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization,SciPost Phys.11 (2021) 071 [2005.04234]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John and V. Malvimat,Momentum space spinning correlators and higher spin equations in three dimensions,JHEP11(2020) 049 [2005.07212]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John and V. Malvimat,Constraining momentum space correlators using slightly broken higher spin symmetry,JHEP04(2021) 231 [2008.08610]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta, A.A. Nizami and A. Suresh,Momentum space parity-odd CFT 3-point functions,JHEP08(2021) 089 [2101.11635]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta, A.A. Nizami and A. Suresh,Double copy structure of parity-violating CFT correlators,JHEP07(2021) 033 [2104.12803]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta, A.A. Nizami and A. Suresh,Higher spin 3-point functions in 3d CFT using spinor-helicity variables,JHEP09(2021) 041 [2106.00016]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Baumann, W.-M

    D. Baumann, W.-M. Chen, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel,Linking the singularities of cosmological correlators,JHEP09(2022) 010 [2106.05294]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Jain and R.R

    S. Jain and R.R. John,Relation between parity-even and parity-odd CFT correlation functions in three dimensions,JHEP12(2021) 067 [2107.00695]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Jain, R.R

    S. Jain, R.R. John, A. Mehta and D.K. S,Constraining momentum space CFT correlators with consistent position space OPE limit and the collider bound,JHEP02(2022) 084 [2111.08024]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Gillioz,Conformal field theory for particle physicists, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer (2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-27086-4, [2207.09474]

    M. Gillioz,Conformal field theory for particle physicists, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer (2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-27086-4, [2207.09474]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27086-4 2023

  28. [28]

    Marotta, K

    R. Marotta, K. Skenderis and M. Verma,Momentum space CFT correlators of non-conserved spinning operators,JHEP03(2023) 196 [2212.13135]. – 22 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    A foray on SCFT 3 via super spinor-helicity and Grassmann twistor variables,

    S. Jain, D.K. S, D. Mazumdar and S. Yadav,A foray on SCFT 3 via super spinor-helicity and Grassmann twistor variables,JHEP09(2024) 027 [2312.03059]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Bzowski,Handbook of derivative AdS amplitudes,JHEP04(2024) 082 [2312.11625]

    A. Bzowski,Handbook of derivative AdS amplitudes,JHEP04(2024) 082 [2312.11625]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    D.K. S, D. Mazumdar and S. Yadav,n-point functions in conformal quantum mechanics: a momentum space odyssey,JHEP08(2024) 085 [2402.16947]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,

    S. Jain, D.K. S and E. Skvortsov,Hidden sectors of Chern-Simons matter theories and exact holography,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 106017 [2405.00773]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories,

    O. Aharony, R.R. Kalloor and T. Kukolj,A chiral limit for Chern-Simons-matter theories, JHEP10(2024) 051 [2405.01647]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Marotta, K

    R. Marotta, K. Skenderis and M. Verma,Flat space spinning massive amplitudes from momentum space CFT,JHEP08(2024) 226 [2406.06447]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Corian´ o and S

    C. Corian´ o and S. Lionetti,CFT constraints on parity-odd interactions with axions and dilatons,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 125008 [2408.02580]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Gillioz,The momentum-space conformal bootstrap in 2d,2502.21227

    M. Gillioz,The momentum-space conformal bootstrap in 2d,2502.21227

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    S,Lectures on the Spinor and Twistor Formalism in 3D Conformal Field Theory, 2508.21633

    D.K. S,Lectures on the Spinor and Twistor Formalism in 3D Conformal Field Theory, 2508.21633

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Baumann, G

    D. Baumann, G. Mathys, G.L. Pimentel and F. Rost,A new twist on spinning (A)dS correlators,JHEP01(2025) 202 [2408.02727]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    A. Bala, S. Jain, D.K. S., D. Mazumdar and V. Singh,3D conformal field theory in twistor space,JHEP12(2025) 120 [2502.18562]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    A. Bala, S. Jain, D.K. S., D. Mazumdar, V. Singh and B. Thakkar,A Supertwistor Formalism forN= 1,2,3,4SCFT 3 accepted for publication in JHEP,2503.19970

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Bala and D.K

    A. Bala and D.K. S,An Ode to the Penrose and Witten transforms in twistor space for 3D CFT,JHEP11(2025) 056 [2505.14082]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Rost,A novel language for spinning (A)dS correlators, Ph.D

    F.E. Rost,A novel language for spinning (A)dS correlators, Ph.D. thesis, 2025

    2025

  43. [43]

    Mazumdar,Super-Penrose & Witten transforms for SCFT 3,JHEP12(2025) 041 [2508.02672]

    D. Mazumdar,Super-Penrose & Witten transforms for SCFT 3,JHEP12(2025) 041 [2508.02672]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Carrillo Gonz´ alez and T

    M. Carrillo Gonz´ alez and T. Keseman,Spinning boundary correlators from (A)dS 4 twistors, JHEP03(2026) 131 [2510.00096]

    work page arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Ansari, S

    A. Ansari, S. Jain and D.K. S,AdS 4 Boundary Wightman functions in Twistor Space: Factorization, Conformal blocks and a Double Copy,2512.04172

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    The Cosmological Grassmannian,

    M. Arundine, D. Baumann, M.H.G. Lee, G.L. Pimentel and F. Rost,The Cosmological Grassmannian,2602.07117

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    A. Bala, S. Jain, D. K.S and A.R. Adithya,TheN= 1Super-Grassmannian for CFT 3 and a Foray on AdS and Cosmological Correlators,To appear(2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    Elvang, Y.-t

    H. Elvang, Y.-t. Huang and C. Peng,On-shell superamplitudes in N<4 SYM,JHEP09 (2011) 031 [1102.4843]

    work page arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    The Vasiliev Grassmannian,

    S. De and H. Lee,The Vasiliev Grassmannian,2603.24656. – 23 –

    work page arXiv