pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07950 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Classification of Pati--Salam Asymmetric mathbb{Z}₂ times mathbb{Z}₂ Heterotic String Orbifolds

Luke A. Detraux , Alon E. Faraggi , Benjamin Percival
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords asymmetric orbifoldsPati-Salam modelsheterotic stringsdoublet-triplet splittingZ2 x Z2 orbifoldsfree fermionic formulationmoduli classificationGGSO phases
0
0 comments X

The pith

Asymmetric actions of the Pati-Salam breaking vector in heterotic orbifolds produce doublet-triplet splitting independent of moduli stabilization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a classification of asymmetric Z2 x Z2 orbifold actions in Pati-Salam heterotic string vacua constructed via the free fermionic formulation. Starting from symmetric orbifolds that preserve an SO(10) gauge group, the breaking vector is permitted to act asymmetrically on the internal degrees of freedom. This produces doublet-triplet splitting in the untwisted sector for every asymmetric action, including pure shifts that leave all geometric moduli intact. The resulting classification organizes the models into six twist-based classes and twenty-four twist-plus-shift cases, supplies explicit three-generation basis sets, and computes partition functions and one-loop vacuum energies for viable models, revealing rising degeneracy as the number of untwisted moduli falls.

Core claim

Asymmetric actions of the Pati-Salam breaking vector on the internal Narain lattice in Z2 x Z2 heterotic orbifolds lead to six inequivalent classes of geometric moduli spaces, characterized by 12, 8, 4 or 0 real untwisted moduli. Combining these with compatible asymmetric shifts produces 24 inequivalent cases. For each, basis sets admitting three chiral generations are provided. Enumeration of GGSO phases in representative classes yields N=1 and N=0 vacua, some exophobic and phenomenologically viable, with computed partition functions showing that fewer moduli correspond to fewer distinct low-energy spectra.

What carries the argument

The twist and shift actions of the Pati-Salam breaking vector in the asymmetric Z2 x Z2 orbifold, which determine the residual untwisted moduli and induce the splitting.

If this is right

  • The doublet-triplet splitting occurs even in pure asymmetric shifts that preserve all geometric moduli.
  • As the number of geometrical moduli decreases, the number of distinct partition functions collapses.
  • Representative models with three chiral generations exist in classes with 12, 8, 4, and 0 moduli.
  • Phenomenologically viable models are identified across the four classes, including both N=1 and N=0 vacua.
  • One-loop vacuum energies are calculated at the free fermionic point for viable models in each class.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The independence from moduli stabilization could allow realistic vacua to be built without additional assumptions about modulus fixing.
  • The rising degeneracy in partition functions implies that many GGSO phase choices produce equivalent low-energy spectra.
  • The six-class structure based on twist action may generalize to other GUT embeddings or orbifold orders.
  • Fewer untwisted moduli shrinks the parameter space, potentially making exhaustive phenomenological scans more tractable.

Load-bearing premise

That every listed asymmetric twist and shift combination satisfies the full set of modular invariance, level-matching, and anomaly cancellation conditions required by the free fermionic formulation of the heterotic string.

What would settle it

Discovery of one specific asymmetric twist and shift combination in the listed classes that violates modular invariance or level-matching would show that the enumeration of the 24 cases is incomplete.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07950 by Alon E. Faraggi, Benjamin Percival, Luke A. Detraux.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Distribution of spacetime vacuum energy at the free fermionic point for exo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a systematic classification of asymmetric $\mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold actions in Pati--Salam heterotic string vacua constructed in the free fermionic formulation. Starting from symmetric $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold vacua with an $SO(10)$ GUT, we allow the Pati--Salam breaking vector to act asymmetrically on the internal degrees of freedom. The asymmetric orbifold action freezes geometrical moduli whilst inducing doublet--triplet splitting in the untwisted sector. Notably, this doublet--triplet splitting operates for any asymmetric action, including pure asymmetric shifts that preserve all geometric moduli, and is therefore independent of moduli stabilisation. Classifying the breaking vector according to its twist action, we find six inequivalent classes of geometric moduli spaces characterised by 12, 8, 4 or 0 real untwisted moduli. Through combining these asymmetric twists with all compatible asymmetric shifts, 24 inequivalent cases are identified and characterised by their residual moduli content and internal Narain lattice. For each case we construct representative basis sets admitting three chiral generations, providing the starting point for further classification within each class. We perform explicit GGSO phase enumerations in representative model classes with 12, 8, 4 and 0 moduli, classify the resulting $\mathcal{N} = 1$ and $\mathcal{N} = 0$ vacua according to phenomenological criteria and identify exophobic, phenomenologically viable models. We compute the partition function and corresponding one-loop vacuum energy at the free fermionic point in moduli space for each phenomenologically viable model across the four classes. As the number of geometrical moduli decreases, the number of distinct partition functions for these vacua collapses to a small number, reflecting a pronounced degeneracy under GGSO phase variations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This manuscript develops a systematic classification of asymmetric Z_2 x Z_2 orbifold actions in Pati-Salam heterotic string vacua in the free fermionic formulation. Starting from symmetric Z_2 x Z_2 models with an SO(10) GUT, the Pati-Salam breaking vector is allowed to act asymmetrically on internal degrees of freedom. This induces doublet-triplet splitting in the untwisted sector (including for pure asymmetric shifts that preserve all geometric moduli) and freezes geometrical moduli. The breaking vectors are classified by twist action into six inequivalent classes of geometric moduli spaces with 12, 8, 4 or 0 real untwisted moduli. Combining these with compatible asymmetric shifts yields 24 inequivalent cases, for which representative basis sets admitting three chiral generations are constructed. GGSO phase enumerations are performed in representative classes to classify N=1 and N=0 vacua, identify exophobic phenomenologically viable models, and compute partition functions together with one-loop vacuum energies at the free-fermionic point, revealing pronounced degeneracy as the number of moduli decreases.

Significance. If the consistency conditions are fully verified as stated, the work supplies explicit, reproducible basis vectors and spectra for asymmetric heterotic models across a range of moduli content. The result that doublet-triplet splitting follows directly from the asymmetric action and holds independently of moduli stabilization (even when all geometric moduli remain) is a concrete phenomenological feature. The reduction to six twist classes and 24 cases, together with the explicit GGSO enumerations and partition-function calculations for viable models, provides a concrete starting point for further classification and model building. The observed collapse of distinct partition functions with fewer moduli is a noteworthy structural observation.

minor comments (3)
  1. §4 (or equivalent section presenting the 24 cases): a compact summary table listing the six twist classes, the associated number of real untwisted moduli, and the number of compatible shifts per class would improve readability and allow quick cross-reference with the representative basis sets.
  2. The partition-function and vacuum-energy results are stated to collapse to a small number of distinct functions as moduli decrease; an explicit count or list of these distinct functions (perhaps in an appendix) would make the degeneracy claim more quantitative.
  3. Notation for the asymmetric shift vectors and GGSO phases is introduced without a dedicated glossary; adding a short table of the allowed phase choices and their modular-invariance constraints would aid readers unfamiliar with the free-fermionic conventions used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and accurate summary of our manuscript, as well as for recommending minor revision. The assessment correctly identifies the key results on the classification of asymmetric orbifold actions, the induction of moduli-independent doublet-triplet splitting, the reduction to 24 inequivalent cases, and the observed degeneracy in partition functions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; classification via explicit enumeration and construction

full rationale

The paper enumerates asymmetric twist and shift vectors in the free-fermionic formulation, enforces modular invariance and level-matching explicitly via GGSO phases, constructs representative basis sets for each of the six twist classes, and derives the doublet-triplet splitting and moduli counts directly from the action on internal fermions and the Narain lattice. No parameters are fitted, no predictions reduce to inputs by construction, and central results rest on explicit calculations rather than self-citations or ansatze. The derivation chain is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The classification rests on the standard consistency requirements of the free-fermionic heterotic string (modular invariance, level matching, anomaly cancellation) and on the domain assumption that the Pati-Salam breaking vector may be chosen to act asymmetrically; no new free parameters or postulated entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The partition function of the heterotic string in the free-fermionic formulation must be modular invariant
    Invoked to ensure only consistent vacua are retained when asymmetric actions are introduced.
  • domain assumption Asymmetric actions of the Pati-Salam breaking vector on internal degrees of freedom are allowed provided they preserve world-sheet supersymmetry and level matching
    Central premise that enables the entire classification of twist and shift combinations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5654 in / 1611 out tokens · 63637 ms · 2026-05-10T18:26:21.483031+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fundamental or Composite? The Higgs Enigma

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Determining if the Higgs is composite would invalidate much of heterotic string model building and favor other quantum gravity approaches, best tested at a 50-60 TeV hadron collider.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Vacuum configurations for superstrings

    P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten. “Vacuum configurations for superstrings”. In:Nucl. Phys.B258 (1985), pp. 46–74

    1985

  2. [2]

    The flippedSU(5)×U(1) string model revamped

    I. Antoniadis, J. Ellis, J. Hagelin, and D. V. Nanopoulos. “The flippedSU(5)×U(1) string model revamped”. In:Physics Letters B231 (1989), pp. 65–74

    1989

  3. [3]

    A standard-like model in the four-dimensional free fermionic string formulation

    A. E. Faraggi, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. Yuan. “A standard-like model in the four-dimensional free fermionic string formulation”. In:Nuclear Physics335 (1990), pp. 347–362

    1990

  4. [4]

    Baryogenesis without grand unification

    I. Antoniadis, G. Leontaris, and J. Rizos. “A three-generationSU(4)×O(4) string model”. In:Phys. Lett.B245 (1990), pp. 161–168.issn: 03702693.doi:10.1016/ 0370- 2693(90)90127- R.url:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/037026939090127R

    work page arXiv 1990

  5. [5]

    A New standard - like model in the four-dimensional free fermionic string formulation

    A. E. Faraggi. “A New standard - like model in the four-dimensional free fermionic string formulation”. In:Phys. Lett.B278 (1992), pp. 131–139

    1992

  6. [6]

    Construction of realistic standard-like models in the free fermionic superstring formulation

    A. E. Faraggi. “Construction of realistic standard-like models in the free fermionic superstring formulation”. In:Nuclear Physics B387.2 (1992), pp. 239–262.issn: 0550-3213.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(92)90160-D

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90160-d 1992

  7. [7]

    String derived MSSM and M-theory unification

    G. Cleaver, A. Faraggi, and D. Nanopoulos. “String derived MSSM and M-theory unification”. In:Physics Letters B455.1 (1999), pp. 135–146.issn: 0370-2693.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00413-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00413-x 1999

  8. [8]

    Z 2 ×Z 2 orbifold compactification as the origin of realistic free fermionic models

    A. E. Faraggi. “Z 2 ×Z 2 orbifold compactification as the origin of realistic free fermionic models”. In:Physics Letters B326.1 (1994), pp. 62–68.issn: 0370-2693. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)91193-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)91193-2 1994

  9. [9]

    Perturbative and non-perturbative partial supersym- metry breaking:N= 4→N= 2→N= 1

    E. Kiritsis and C. Kounnas. “Perturbative and non-perturbative partial supersym- metry breaking:N= 4→N= 2→N= 1”. In:Nuclear Physics503 (1997), pp. 117–156

    1997

  10. [10]

    Z 2 ×Z 2 heterotic orbifold models of non factorisable six dimensional toroidal manifolds

    A. E. Faraggi, S. Forste, and C. Timirgaziu. “Z 2 ×Z 2 heterotic orbifold models of non factorisable six dimensional toroidal manifolds”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2006 (2006), pp. 057–057

    2006

  11. [11]

    On orbifolds and free fermion constructions

    R. Y. Donagi and K. Wendland. “On orbifolds and free fermion constructions”. In: Journal of Geometry and Physics59 (2009), pp. 942–968

    2009

  12. [12]

    Heterotic free fermionic and symmetric toroidal orbifold models

    P. Athanasopoulos, A. E. Faraggi, S. G. Nibbelink, and V. M. Mehta. “Heterotic free fermionic and symmetric toroidal orbifold models”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2016 (2016), pp. 1–51

    2016

  13. [13]

    Classification of the chiral Z(2) x Z(2) fermionic models in the heterotic superstring

    A. E. Faraggi, C. Kounnas, S. E. M. Nooij, and J. Rizos. “Classification of the chiral Z(2) x Z(2) fermionic models in the heterotic superstring”. In:Nucl. Phys. B695 (2004), pp. 41–72.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.06.030. arXiv:hep- th/0403058 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.06.030 2004

  14. [14]

    Chiral family classification of fermionic Z2 ×Z 2 heterotic orbifold models

    A. E. Faraggi, C. Kounnas, and J. Rizos. “Chiral family classification of fermionic Z2 ×Z 2 heterotic orbifold models”. In:Physics Letters B648.1 (2007), pp. 84–89. issn: 0370-2693.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2006.09.071. 57

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.09.071 2007

  15. [15]

    Spinor-vector duality in fermionicZ 2 ×Z2 heterotic orbifold models

    A. E. Faraggi, C. Kounnas, and J. Rizos. “Spinor-vector duality in fermionicZ 2 ×Z2 heterotic orbifold models”. In:Nuclear Physics B774.1 (2007), pp. 208–231.issn: 0550-3213.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.03.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.03.029 2007

  16. [16]

    Classifica- tion of heterotic Pati–Salam models

    B. Assel, K. Christodoulides, A. E. Faraggi, C. Kounnas, and J. Rizos. “Classifica- tion of heterotic Pati–Salam models”. In:Nuclear Physics B844.3 (2011), pp. 365– 396.issn: 0550-3213.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11. 011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11 2011

  17. [17]

    Classification of flippedSU(5) heterotic- string vacua

    A. E. Faraggi, J. Rizos, and H. Sonmez. “Classification of flippedSU(5) heterotic- string vacua”. In:Nuclear Physics B886 (2014), pp. 202–242.issn: 0550-3213.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.06.025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.06.025 2014

  18. [18]

    Classification of standard-like heterotic- string vacua

    A. E. Faraggi, J. Rizos, and H. Sonmez. “Classification of standard-like heterotic- string vacua”. In:Nuclear Physics B927 (2018), pp. 1–34.issn: 0550-3213.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.12.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.12.006 2018

  19. [19]

    Classification of left–right symmetric het- erotic string vacua

    A. E. Faraggi, G. Harries, and J. Rizos. “Classification of left–right symmetric het- erotic string vacua”. In:Nuclear Physics B936 (2018), pp. 472–500.issn: 0550-3213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.09.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.09.028 2018

  20. [20]

    Electric and magnetic charges in superstring models

    X.-G. Wen and E. Witten. “Electric and magnetic charges in superstring models”. In:Nuclear Physics B261 (1985), pp. 651–677.issn: 0550-3213.doi:https : / / doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90592-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90592-9 1985

  21. [21]

    Remarks on Wilson lines, modular invariance and possible string relics in Calabi-Yau compactifications

    G. G. Athanasiu, J. J. Atick, M. Dine, and W. Fischler. “Remarks on Wilson lines, modular invariance and possible string relics in Calabi-Yau compactifications”. In: Physics Letters B214.1 (1988), pp. 55–62.issn: 0370-2693.doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)90451-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90451-0 1988

  22. [22]

    Electric charge quantization in string theory

    A. Schellekens. “Electric charge quantization in string theory”. In:Physics Letters B237 (1990), pp. 363–369.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91190-M

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91190-m 1990

  23. [23]

    Fractional charges in a superstring derived standard like model

    A. E. Faraggi. “Fractional charges in a superstring derived standard like model”. In:Phys. Rev. D46 (1992), pp. 3204–3207.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.3204

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.3204 1992

  24. [24]

    Stable superstring relics

    S. Chang, C. Corian` o, and A. E. Faraggi. “Stable superstring relics”. In:Nuclear Physics B477.1 (1996), pp. 65–104.issn: 0550-3213.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/0550-3213(96)00371-9

    1996

  25. [25]

    Stable superstring relics and ultra- high energy cosmic rays

    C. Corian` o, A. E. Faraggi, and M. Pl¨ umacher. “Stable superstring relics and ultra- high energy cosmic rays”. In:Nuclear Physics B614.1 (2001), pp. 233–253.issn: 0550-3213.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00420-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00420-5 2001

  26. [26]

    Search for free fractional electric charge elementary particles

    V. Halyo, P. Kim, E. R. Lee, I. T. Lee, D. Loomba, and M. L. Perl. “Search for free fractional electric charge elementary particles”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000), pp. 2576–2579.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2576. arXiv:hep-ex/9910064

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2576 2000

  27. [27]

    Exophobic quasi-realistic heterotic string vacua

    B. Assel, K. Christodoulides, A. E. Faraggi, C. Kounnas, and J. Rizos. “Exophobic quasi-realistic heterotic string vacua”. In:Physics Letters B683.4 (2010), pp. 306– 313.issn: 0370-2693.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.033

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.033 2010

  28. [28]

    Towards the classification of tachyon- free models from tachyonic ten-dimensional heterotic string vacua

    A. E. Faraggi, V. G. Matyas, and B. Percival. “Towards the classification of tachyon- free models from tachyonic ten-dimensional heterotic string vacua”. In:Nuclear Physics B961 (2020), p. 115231.issn: 0550-3213.doi:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115231. 58

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Classification of nonsupersymmetric Pati- Salam heterotic string models

    A. Faraggi, V. Matyas, and B. Percival. “Classification of nonsupersymmetric Pati- Salam heterotic string models”. In:Physical Review D104 (2021).doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.046002

    2021

  30. [30]

    Type 0Z 2 ×Z 2 heterotic string orbifolds and misaligned supersymmetry

    A. Faraggi, V. Matyas, and B. Percival. “Type 0Z 2 ×Z 2 heterotic string orbifolds and misaligned supersymmetry”. In:International Journal of Modern Physics A36 (2021), p. 2150174.doi:10.1142/S0217751X21501748

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x21501748 2021

  31. [31]

    Type ¯0 heterotic string orbifolds

    A. E. Faraggi, V. G. Matyas, and B. Percival. “Type ¯0 heterotic string orbifolds”. In:Physics Letters B814 (2021), p. 136080.issn: 0370-2693.doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136080

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136080 2021

  32. [33]

    Spontaneous Breaking of Supersymmetry Through Dimensional Reduction

    J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz. “Spontaneous Breaking of Supersymmetry Through Dimensional Reduction”. In:Phys. Lett. B82 (1979), pp. 60–64.doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(79)90425-8

    1979

  33. [34]

    How to Get Masses from Extra Dimensions

    J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz. “How to Get Masses from Extra Dimensions”. In: Nucl. Phys. B153 (1979), pp. 61–88.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90592-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90592-3 1979

  34. [35]

    Superstring Solutions With Spontaneously Broken Four-dimensional Supersymmetry

    S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas, and M. Porrati. “Superstring Solutions With Spontaneously Broken Four-dimensional Supersymmetry”. In:Nucl. Phys. B304 (1988), pp. 500– 512.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90639-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90639-6 1988

  35. [36]

    Superstrings with Sponta- neously Broken Supersymmetry and their Effective Theories

    S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas, M. Porrati, and F. Zwirner. “Superstrings with Sponta- neously Broken Supersymmetry and their Effective Theories”. In:Nucl. Phys. B 318 (1989), pp. 75–105.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90048-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90048-5 1989

  36. [37]

    Non-tachyonic semi-realistic non-supersymmetric heterotic-string vacua

    J. M. Ashfaque, P. Athanasopoulos, A. E. Faraggi, and H. Sonmez. “Non-tachyonic semi-realistic non-supersymmetric heterotic-string vacua”. In:The European Phys- ical Journal C76 (2015), pp. 1–17

    2015

  37. [38]

    AnO(16)timesO(16) heterotic string

    L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e, P. Ginsparg, G. Moore, and C. Vafa. “AnO(16)timesO(16) heterotic string”. In:Physics Letters B171.2 (1986), pp. 155–162.issn: 0370-2693. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)91524-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91524-8 1986

  38. [39]

    Classification of Closed Fermionic String Models

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S. H. H. Tye. “Classification of Closed Fermionic String Models”. In:Phys. Rev. D34 (1986), p. 3794.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34. 3794

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.34 1986

  39. [40]

    String theories in ten dimensions without spacetime su- persymmetry

    L. Dixon and J. Harvey. “String theories in ten dimensions without spacetime su- persymmetry”. In:Nuclear Physics B274.1 (1986), pp. 93–105.issn: 0550-3213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(86)90619-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90619-x 1986

  40. [41]

    Towards a nonsupersymmetric string phenomenology

    S. Abel, K. R. Dienes, and E. Mavroudi. “Towards a nonsupersymmetric string phenomenology”. In:Physical Review D91 (2015), p. 126014

    2015

  41. [42]

    Chiral Heterotic Strings with Positive Cosmological Con- stant

    I. Florakis and J. Rizos. “Chiral Heterotic Strings with Positive Cosmological Con- stant”. In:Nuclear Physics913 (2016), pp. 495–533

    2016

  42. [43]

    Super no-scale models with Pati- Salam gauge group

    I. Florakis, J. Rizos, and K. Violaris-Gountonis. “Super no-scale models with Pati- Salam gauge group”. In:Nuclear Physics B976 (2022), p. 115689.issn: 0550-3213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115689. 59

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115689 2022

  43. [44]

    Three-generation super no-scale models in heterotic superstrings

    I. Florakis, J. Rizos, and K. Violaris-Gountonis. “Three-generation super no-scale models in heterotic superstrings”. In:Phys. Lett. B833 (2022), p. 137311.doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137311. arXiv:2206.09732 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137311 2022

  44. [45]

    Fayet–Iliopoulos D- term in non-supersymmetric heterotic string orbifolds

    A. R. Diaz Avalos, A. E. Faraggi, V. Matyas, and B. Percival. “Fayet–Iliopoulos D- term in non-supersymmetric heterotic string orbifolds”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C83.10 (2023), p. 926.doi:10 . 1140 / epjc / s10052 - 023 - 12059 - 9. arXiv:2302 . 10075 [hep-th]

    2023

  45. [46]

    On consistency of the interacting (anti)holomorphic higher-spin sector

    E. Basaad, L. A. Detraux, A. R. Diaz Avalos, A. E. Faraggi, and B. Percival. “Vacuum energy in non-supersymmetric quasi-realistic heterotic-string vacua with fixed moduli”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C85.2 (2025), p. 209.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 024-13733-2. arXiv:2408.03928 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2025

  46. [47]

    A perturbatively stable non- supersymmetric string model with AdS vacuum

    I. Antoniadis, A. R. Diaz Avalos, and A. E. Faraggi. “A perturbatively stable non- supersymmetric string model with AdS vacuum”. In:JHEP11 (2025), p. 068.doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2025)068. arXiv:2504.19364 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2025)068 2025

  47. [48]

    Vacuum energy cancellation in a non- supersymmetric string

    S. Kachru, J. Kumar, and E. Silverstein. “Vacuum energy cancellation in a non- supersymmetric string”. In:Physical Review D59.10 (Apr. 1999).issn: 1089-4918. doi:10 . 1103 / physrevd . 59 . 106004.url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevD.59.106004

    1999

  48. [49]

    String duality and nonsupersymmetric strings

    J. A. Harvey. “String duality and nonsupersymmetric strings”. In:Physical Review D59.2 (Dec. 1998).issn: 1089-4918.doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.026002.url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.026002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.026002.url: 1998

  49. [50]

    Bose-Fermi degeneracy and duality in non- supersymmetric strings

    G. Shiu and S.-H. Henry Tye. “Bose-Fermi degeneracy and duality in non- supersymmetric strings”. In:Nuclear Physics B542.1–2 (Mar. 1999), pp. 45–72. issn: 0550-3213.doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(98)00775-5.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00775-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(98)00775-5.url:http://dx.doi 1999

  50. [51]

    Asymmetric orbifolds with vanishing one-loop vacuum energy

    V. Larotonda, M. Montero, and M. Tartaglia.Asymmetric orbifolds with vanishing one-loop vacuum energy. 2026. arXiv:2602.07113 [hep-th].url:https://arxiv. org/abs/2602.07113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  51. [52]

    McAllister and F

    L. McAllister and F. Quevedo. “Moduli Stabilization in String Theory”. In: (Oct. 2023). arXiv:2310.20559 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [53]

    Moduli fixing in realistic string vacua

    A. E. Faraggi. “Moduli fixing in realistic string vacua”. In:Nuclear Physics B728.1 (2005), pp. 83–108.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.08.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.08.028 2005

  53. [54]

    Doubled Geometry and T-Folds

    C. M. Hull. “Doubled Geometry and T-Folds”. In:JHEP07 (2007), p. 080.doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/080. arXiv:hep-th/0605149

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/080 2007

  54. [55]

    T-duality orbifolds of heterotic Narain compactifications

    S. G. Nibbelink and P. K. S. Vaudrevange. “T-duality orbifolds of heterotic Narain compactifications”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2017 (2017), pp. 1–59

    2017

  55. [56]

    Gravitational lensing by Born-Infeld naked singularities.Phys

    A. E. Faraggi, S. Groot Nibbelink, and B. Percival. “Free fermionic webs of heterotic T folds”. In:Phys. Rev. D109.5 (2024), p. L051701.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109. L051701. arXiv:2306.16443 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109 2024

  56. [57]

    A worldsheet perspective on heterotic T-duality orbifolds

    S. G. Nibbelink. “A worldsheet perspective on heterotic T-duality orbifolds”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics2021.4 (Apr. 2021).issn: 1029-8479.doi:10 . 1007/jhep04(2021)190.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)190. 60

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)190 2021

  57. [58]

    Bosons, fermions and Thirring strings

    J. Bagger, D. Nemeschansky, N. Seiberg, and S. Yankielowicz. “Bosons, fermions and Thirring strings”. In:Nucl. Phys.B289 (1987), p. 53.doi:10 . 1016 / 0550 - 3213(87)90371-3

    1987

  58. [59]

    Twisted Thirring Interaction and Gauge Symmetry Breaking inN= 1 Supersymmetric Superstring Models

    D. Chang and A. Kumar. “Twisted Thirring Interaction and Gauge Symmetry Breaking inN= 1 Supersymmetric Superstring Models”. In:Phys. Rev. D38 (1988), p. 3734.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.38.3734

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.38.3734 1988

  59. [60]

    Moduli and Kahler potential in fermionic strings

    J. L. Lopez, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K.-J. Yuan. “Moduli and Kahler potential in fermionic strings”. In:Phys. Rev. D50 (1994), pp. 4060–4074.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.50.4060. arXiv:hep-th/9405120

    work page arXiv 1994

  60. [61]

    Towards Classification ofN= 1 and N= 0 FlippedSU(5) AsymmetricZ 2 ×Z 2 Heterotic String Orbifolds

    A. E. Faraggi, V. G. Matyas, and B. Percival. “Towards Classification ofN= 1 and N= 0 FlippedSU(5) AsymmetricZ 2 ×Z 2 Heterotic String Orbifolds”. In: (2022). arXiv:2202.04507 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [62]

    More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions

    A. E. Faraggi. “Hierarchical top - bottom mass relation in a superstring derived standard - like model”. In:Phys. Lett. B274 (1992), pp. 47–52.doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(92)90302-K

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1992

  62. [63]

    Yukawa couplings in superstring-derived standard-like models

    A. E. Faraggi. “Yukawa couplings in superstring-derived standard-like models”. In: Phys. Rev. D47 (11 1993), pp. 5021–5028.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.47.5021

    1993

  63. [64]

    Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,

    A. E. Faraggi. “Proton stability in superstring derived models”. In:Nucl. Phys. B428 (1994), pp. 111–125.doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(94)90194- 5. arXiv:hep- ph/9403312

    work page doi:10.1016/0550- 1994

  64. [65]

    Doublet–triplet splitting in realistic heterotic string derived models

    A. E. Faraggi. “Doublet–triplet splitting in realistic heterotic string derived models”. In:Physics Letters B520.3 (2001), pp. 337–344.issn: 0370-2693.doi:https : //doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01165-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(01)01165-0 2001

  65. [66]

    Four-dimensional superstrings

    I. Antoniadis, C. P. Bachas, and C. Kounnas. “Four-dimensional superstrings”. In: Nuclear Physics289 (1987), pp. 87–108

    1987

  66. [67]

    4D fermionic superstrings with arbitrary twists

    I. Antoniadis and C. P. Bachas. “4D fermionic superstrings with arbitrary twists”. In:Nuclear Physics298 (1988), pp. 586–612

    1988

  67. [68]

    Construction of fermionic string models in four dimensions

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S.-H. Henry Tye. “Construction of fermionic string models in four dimensions”. In:Nuclear Physics B288 (1987), pp. 1–76.issn: 0550- 3213.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(87)90208-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90208-2 1987

  68. [69]

    The Effective Interactions of Chiral Families in Four-dimensional Superstrings

    S. Ferrara, L. Girardello, C. Kounnas, and M. Porrati. “The Effective Interactions of Chiral Families in Four-dimensional Superstrings”. In:Phys. Lett. B194 (1987), pp. 358–365.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91066-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91066-5 1987

  69. [70]

    GUT Model Building with Fermionic Four-Dimensional Strings

    I. Antoniadis, J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, and D. V. Nanopoulos. “GUT Model Building with Fermionic Four-Dimensional Strings”. In:Phys. Lett. B205 (1988), pp. 459–465.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90978-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90978-1 1988

  70. [71]

    Naturalness of three generations in free fermionic Z(2)-n x Z(4) string models

    A. E. Faraggi and D. V. Nanopoulos. “Naturalness of three generations in free fermionic Z(2)-n x Z(4) string models”. In:Phys. Rev. D48 (1993), pp. 3288–3296. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3288

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.3288 1993

  71. [72]

    A note on toroidal compactification of heterotic string theory

    K. S. Narain, M. H. Sarmadi, and E. Witten. “A note on toroidal compactification of heterotic string theory”. In:Nucl. Phys.B279 (1987), p. 369. 61

    1987

  72. [73]

    Mechanisms of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the fermionic construction of superstring models

    D. Chang and A. Kumar. “Mechanisms of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the fermionic construction of superstring models”. In:Phys. Rev.D38 (1988), p. 1893. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.38.1893

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.38.1893 1988

  73. [74]

    Manifestly crossing-invariant parametrization of n-meson amplitude,

    E. Halyo. “Untwisted moduli and internal fermions in free fermionic strings”. In: Nuclear Physics B438.1-2 (Mar. 1995), pp. 138–160.issn: 05503213.doi:10.1016/ 0550- 3213(94)00578- 3. arXiv:9410018 [hep-th].url:http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0550321394005783%20http://inspirehep.net/ record/377831%20http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9410018

    work page arXiv 1995

  74. [75]

    A supersymmetric SU(4)xSO(4) model

    I. Antoniadis and G. K. Leontaris. “A supersymmetric SU(4)xSO(4) model”. In: Physics Letters B216.3-4 (1989), pp. 333–335

    1989

  75. [76]

    Z3: An efficient SMT solver

    L. de Moura and N. Bjørner. “Z3: An efficient SMT solver”. In:In Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS ’08) (2008)

    2008

  76. [77]

    A three-generationSU(4)×O(4) string model

    I. Antoniadis, G. K. Leontaris, and J. Rizos. “A three-generationSU(4)×O(4) string model”. In:Physics Letters B245 (1990), pp. 161–168

    1990

  77. [78]

    N=1 supersymmetric SU(4) x SU(2)(L) x SU(2)(R) effective theory from the weakly coupled heterotic superstring

    G. K. Leontaris and J. Rizos. “N=1 supersymmetric SU(4) x SU(2)(L) x SU(2)(R) effective theory from the weakly coupled heterotic superstring”. In:Nucl. Phys. B554 (1999), pp. 3–49.doi:10 . 1016 / S0550 - 3213(99 ) 00303 - X. arXiv:hep - th/9901098

    work page arXiv 1999

  78. [79]

    Toward the classification of the realistic free fermionic models

    A. E. Faraggi. “Toward the classification of the realistic free fermionic models”. In: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14 (1999), pp. 1663–1702.doi:10.1142/S0217751X99000841

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x99000841 1999

  79. [80]

    Top quark mass in exophobic Pati–Salam heterotic string model

    K. Christodoulides, A. E. Faraggi, and J. Rizos. “Top quark mass in exophobic Pati–Salam heterotic string model”. In:Physics Letters B702.1 (2011), pp. 81–89. issn: 0370-2693.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.06.051

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.06.051 2011

  80. [81]

    DOI 10.1140/epjc/ s10052-022-10942-5

    J. Rizos. “Top quark mass coupling and classification of weakly-coupled heterotic superstring vacua”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C74.6 (2014), p. 2905.doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-014-2905-4. arXiv:1404.0819 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2014

Showing first 80 references.