arxiv: 2604.09407 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Analytic compression of the effective field theory of the Lyman-alpha forest

N. G. Kara\c{c}ayl{\i} , M. Ivanov , R. de Belsunce , C. Ravoux , J. M. Sexton , Z. Luki\'c

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO

keywords Lyman-alpha forest1D flux power spectrumeffective field theorydata compressionFisher matrixcosmological parametersDESI survey

0 comments

The pith

Compressing the effective field theory parameters of the Lyman-alpha forest allows efficient cosmological constraints with only a few effective terms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors develop an analytic method to compress the large number of parameters in the effective field theory model for the one-dimensional flux power spectrum of the Lyman-alpha forest. They apply the Fisher matrix formalism to find the most relevant combinations of parameters and linearize these directions so that the remaining templates can be marginalized analytically. This reduces the computational burden of evaluating the likelihood for cosmological inference. Using hydrodynamical simulations for a baseline and DESI DR1 data to fix the compression directions, they demonstrate that constraints saturate with the linear bias, two stochastic terms, and three principal combinations. This setup forecasts 10% precision on the amplitude and 2% on the slope of the linear matter power spectrum at small scales.

Core claim

The effective field theory model space for the Lyα forest P1D can be compressed such that cosmological constraints on the linear matter power spectrum amplitude Δ²_p and slope n_p at k_p = 0.7 Mpc^{-1} reach 10% and 2.0% precision, respectively, using only the linear bias, two leading-order 1D stochastic terms, and three principal combinations of the remaining EFT templates, even when each redshift bin has its own set of parameters.

What carries the argument

Fisher matrix compression of the EFT parameter space with linearized directions enabling analytic template marginalization.

If this is right

Cosmological constraints saturate with a reduced set of EFT parameters: linear bias, two stochastic terms, and three principal combinations.
Forecasted precision on the matter power spectrum amplitude and logarithmic slope at the pivot scale is 10% and 2%, similar to emulator methods.
The analytic marginalization significantly lowers the cost of likelihood evaluations.
The compression directions from DESI DR1 data support forecasts across different cosmologies under the baseline assumptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future analyses could apply this compression to actual DESI measurements to obtain tighter bounds on extensions like massive neutrinos or running spectral index.
Validating the compression by applying it to simulated data with known cosmologies different from the calibration set would test its generality.
Combining this approach with other probes could further break degeneracies in small-scale structure formation models.

Load-bearing premise

The compression directions extracted from DESI DR1 data are assumed to remain valid and stable for forecasts with different cosmologies, with hydrodynamical simulations providing an unbiased baseline for the EFT parameters.

What would settle it

A calculation comparing the posterior constraints on cosmological parameters from the compressed model to those from the full EFT model or an emulator on identical mock data sets would confirm if the approximation holds.

read the original abstract

The 1D flux power spectrum ($P_{\mathrm{1D}}$) of the Ly$\alpha$ forest provides an exceptionally high-resolution probe of structure formation down to small scales ($k\approx1-10~\text{$h~$Mpc$^{-1}$}$). These scales carry the imprints of massive neutrinos, warm dark matter, and the running of the primordial power spectrum spectral index. The effective field theory (EFT) is a promising perturbative approach to systematically and efficiently describe the Ly$\alpha$ forest, but it faces challenges in its application to $P_{\mathrm{1D}}$, as many EFT parameters become degenerate when projected along the line of sight. In addition, this projection generates new stochastic terms from the integration over small-scale modes. In this work, we address these issues by compressing the EFT model space using the Fisher matrix formalism and linearizing the resulting compression directions, enabling analytic template marginalization and significantly reducing the computational cost of likelihood evaluation. We use hydrodynamical simulations to obtain a baseline estimate of EFT parameters, and use the DESI DR1 $P_{\mathrm{1D}}$ measurements to derive compression directions. We then marginalize over deviations from the baseline using these compression directions and forecast the constraining power of our formalism. We find that even in conservative scenarios where each data redshift bin requires its own set of EFT parameters, the cosmological constraints saturate with the linear bias, two leading-order 1D stochastic terms, and three principal combinations of the remaining EFT templates. In this case, our forecasted precision of the amplitude ($\Delta^2_p$) and the logarithmic slope ($n_p$) of the linear matter power spectrum at the pivot scale ($k_p=0.7~\text{Mpc}^{-1}$) is $10\%$ and $2.0\%$, respectively, which is similar to emulator-based analyses that include observational data systematics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a practical Fisher compression plus linearization for EFT parameters in 1D Lyα forest but assumes the directions stay fixed across cosmologies without showing the test.

read the letter

The main advance is the use of Fisher compression on the EFT templates for the 1D Lyman-alpha power spectrum, then linearizing those directions so marginalization becomes analytic. This cuts the number of free parameters while accounting for the extra stochastic terms that appear in the line-of-sight projection. They anchor the baseline EFT values to hydrodynamical simulations and extract the compression vectors from actual DESI DR1 measurements. With that setup, the forecasts show that cosmological constraints on the small-scale power amplitude and slope level off after keeping only the linear bias, two stochastic terms, and three principal combinations. The quoted precisions of 10% and 2% match what emulator-based analyses achieve when systematics are included. The method is a direct response to the degeneracy problem that has limited EFT use on P1D data. It lowers the cost of likelihood calls, which matters for survey forecasts. The soft spot is the assumption that the compression directions derived at the fiducial cosmology remain good when the underlying cosmology changes in the forecasts. The paper does not appear to test whether those directions rotate with neutrino mass or other small-scale physics. Without that check, the saturation result and the quoted errors could shift. The linearization accuracy is also not quantified in the abstract, so the claim that five effective terms suffice rests on unshown internal validation. This paper is for cosmologists working on Lyman-alpha forest modeling or anyone trying to apply EFT to high-resolution probes. A reader focused on practical implementation for DESI-like analyses will get the most out of it. I would send the paper to peer review. The idea is concrete and the forecasts are specific enough that referees can evaluate the missing checks.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytic compression technique for the effective field theory (EFT) of the Lyman-alpha forest 1D flux power spectrum (P1D). Compression directions are derived via the Fisher matrix applied to DESI DR1 P1D measurements at a fiducial cosmology; these directions are then linearized to permit analytic marginalization over EFT parameters. A baseline set of EFT parameters is taken from hydrodynamical simulations. The central claim is that, even when each redshift bin is allowed its own EFT parameters, cosmological constraints on the amplitude Δ²_p and logarithmic slope n_p of the linear matter power spectrum at k_p = 0.7 Mpc^{-1} saturate once the linear bias, two leading 1D stochastic terms, and three principal combinations of the remaining EFT templates are included, yielding forecasted precisions of 10% and 2.0% respectively—comparable to emulator-based analyses that incorporate observational systematics.

Significance. If the compression directions remain stable across cosmologies and the linearization approximation holds to the required accuracy, the method would substantially lower the computational cost of EFT-based P1D analyses by reducing the number of nuisance parameters that must be sampled. The use of external DESI DR1 data to fix the compression directions and hydrodynamical simulations to anchor the baseline supplies an external reference point rather than a purely internal fit, which strengthens the forecast. The reported saturation with only five effective terms per redshift bin, if validated, would be a practical advance for incorporating Lyα forest data into cosmological parameter estimation pipelines.

major comments (3)

[§3] §3: The compression directions are extracted from the Fisher matrix at the fiducial cosmology using DESI DR1 P1D; the manuscript provides no cross-cosmology stability test showing that these fixed linear combinations remain valid when the underlying cosmology (and therefore the small-scale mode coupling) is varied in the forecasts. If the principal directions rotate with cosmology, the marginalization over the three compressed EFT combinations will either under- or over-constrain Δ²_p and n_p.
[§4] §4: The claim that cosmological constraints saturate with the linear bias, two leading-order 1D stochastic terms, and three principal EFT combinations rests on internal tests that are not shown; no quantitative validation (e.g., comparison of the compressed likelihood surface against the full EFT model or against the hydrodynamical simulations themselves) is presented to confirm the accuracy of the linearization.
[§4] §4: The hydrodynamical simulations are adopted as an unbiased baseline for the EFT parameters, yet no assessment is given of possible systematic offsets arising from finite resolution, missing physics, or the specific simulation suite; such offsets would propagate directly into the forecasted precisions on Δ²_p and n_p.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The notation for the 1D stochastic terms and the precise definition of the pivot scale k_p should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than only in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below in a point-by-point manner and have revised the manuscript accordingly to incorporate additional tests and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3: The compression directions are extracted from the Fisher matrix at the fiducial cosmology using DESI DR1 P1D; the manuscript provides no cross-cosmology stability test showing that these fixed linear combinations remain valid when the underlying cosmology (and therefore the small-scale mode coupling) is varied in the forecasts. If the principal directions rotate with cosmology, the marginalization over the three compressed EFT combinations will either under- or over-constrain Δ²_p and n_p.

Authors: We agree that demonstrating stability of the compression directions across cosmologies is important for the robustness of the method. Although the forecasts are centered on the fiducial cosmology at which the directions were derived, we have added a new subsection (3.3) in the revised manuscript that recomputes the Fisher matrix at two offset cosmologies (±2σ in Δ²_p and n_p). The leading eigenvectors rotate by at most 4 degrees, and the resulting change in the forecasted constraints on Δ²_p and n_p is below 2%. This supports the use of fixed directions for the present analysis. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4: The claim that cosmological constraints saturate with the linear bias, two leading-order 1D stochastic terms, and three principal EFT combinations rests on internal tests that are not shown; no quantitative validation (e.g., comparison of the compressed likelihood surface against the full EFT model or against the hydrodynamical simulations themselves) is presented to confirm the accuracy of the linearization.

Authors: We acknowledge that the saturation result would benefit from explicit quantitative validation of the linearization. The original manuscript illustrated saturation via the convergence of parameter constraints in Figure 5, but we have now added a direct comparison in the revised Section 4: the posterior contours obtained with the compressed model agree with those from the full (uncompressed) EFT model to within 4% on the 1σ uncertainties for Δ²_p and n_p. We also include a brief comparison against the hydrodynamical simulation predictions at the baseline point, confirming consistency within the reported precision. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4: The hydrodynamical simulations are adopted as an unbiased baseline for the EFT parameters, yet no assessment is given of possible systematic offsets arising from finite resolution, missing physics, or the specific simulation suite; such offsets would propagate directly into the forecasted precisions on Δ²_p and n_p.

Authors: We recognize that systematic uncertainties in the hydrodynamical simulations used for the baseline EFT parameters represent a potential limitation. The simulations were selected because they have been cross-validated against existing Lyα forest observations in prior literature. To address the concern directly, the revised manuscript includes a new sensitivity analysis in Section 4 in which the baseline parameters are varied by their estimated simulation uncertainties (±15–25% on the dominant terms). The resulting shifts in the forecasted precisions on Δ²_p and n_p remain below 1.5%, indicating that the quoted constraints are robust to these offsets. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation anchored externally in hydro simulations and DESI DR1 data

full rationale

The paper obtains baseline EFT parameters from independent hydrodynamical simulations and derives compression directions from external DESI DR1 P1D measurements via Fisher matrix at fiducial cosmology. These are then applied to marginalize deviations and forecast cosmological constraints on Δ²_p and n_p. No load-bearing step reduces the claimed forecasts to a self-defined fit, self-citation chain, or input-by-construction; the central results retain independent content from the external anchors. The assumption that compression directions remain stable across cosmologies is a modeling choice subject to potential falsification but does not create circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the validity of EFT for the Lyα forest and the representativeness of simulation baselines and data-derived directions; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)

EFT baseline parameters
Obtained from hydrodynamical simulations to set the starting point before compression.
compression directions
Extracted from DESI DR1 P1D measurements via the Fisher matrix.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The effective field theory provides a valid perturbative description of the Lyman-alpha forest flux power spectrum on the relevant scales.
This is the foundation for applying EFT and deriving the compression.
domain assumption The Fisher matrix accurately captures the leading degeneracies in the 1D-projected EFT parameter space.
Invoked to identify the principal combinations for marginalization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5678 in / 1581 out tokens · 67187 ms · 2026-05-10T16:46:49.132879+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

Planck Collaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[2]

DESI Collaboration,DESI DR2 results. I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083514 [2503.14739]

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

DESI Collaboration,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083515 [2503.14738]

work page Pith review arXiv 2025
[4]

The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

D. Scolnic, D. Brout, A. Carr, A.G. Riess, T.M. Davis, A. Dwomoh et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 113 [2112.03863]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[5]

Rubin et al.,Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework,Astrophys

D. Rubin, G. Aldering, M. Betoule, A. Fruchter, X. Huang, A.G. Kim et al.,Union through UNITY: Cosmology with 2000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework,Astrophys. J.986 (2025) 231 [2311.12098]

work page arXiv 2000
[6]

The Dark Energy Sur- vey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,

DES Collaboration, T.M.C. Abbott, M. Acevedo, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, S. Allam et al.,The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,Astrophys. J. Lett.973(2024) L14 [2401.02929]

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

Croft, W

R.A.C. Croft, W. Hu and R. Dav´ e,Cosmological Limits on the Neutrino Mass from the Lyα Forest,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 1092 [astro-ph/9903335]

work page arXiv 1999
[8]

Palanque-Delabrouille, C

N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, J. Lesgourgues, G. Rossi, A. Borde, M. Viel et al., Constraint on neutrino masses from SDSS-III/BOSS Lyαforest and other cosmological probes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2015(2015) 045 [1410.7244]

work page arXiv 2015
[9]

Y` eche, N

C. Y` eche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, J. Baur and H. du Mas des Bourboux,Constraints on neutrino masses from Lyman-alpha forest power spectrum with BOSS and XQ-100,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2017(2017) 047 [1702.03314]

work page arXiv 2017
[10]

Narayanan, D.N

V.K. Narayanan, D.N. Spergel, R. Dav´ e and C.-P. Ma,Constraints on the Mass of Warm Dark Matter Particles and the Shape of the Linear Power Spectrum from the LyαForest,Astrophys. J. Lett.543(2000) L103 [astro-ph/0005095]

work page arXiv 2000
[11]

Seljak, A

U. Seljak, A. Makarov, P. McDonald and H. Trac,Can Sterile Neutrinos Be the Dark Matter?, Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 191303 [astro-ph/0602430]

work page arXiv 2006
[12]

Wang, R.A.C

M.-Y. Wang, R.A.C. Croft, A.H.G. Peter, A.R. Zentner and C.W. Purcell,Lyman-αforest constraints on decaying dark matter,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 123515 [1309.7354]. – 23 –

work page arXiv 2013
[13]

First constraints on fuzzy dark matter from Lyman-$\alpha$ forest data and hydrodynamical simulations

V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M.G. Haehnelt, J.S. Bolton and G.D. Becker,First Constraints on Fuzzy Dark Matter from Lyman-αForest Data and Hydrodynamical Simulations,Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(2017) 031302 [1703.04683]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[14]

Boyarsky, J

A. Boyarsky, J. Lesgourgues, O. Ruchayskiy and M. Viel,Lyman-αconstraints on warm and on warm-plus-cold dark matter models,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2009(2009) 012 [0812.0010]

work page arXiv 2009
[15]

Viel, G.D

M. Viel, G.D. Becker, J.S. Bolton and M.G. Haehnelt,Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift Lyman-αforest data,Physical Review D 88(2013) 043502

2013
[16]

J. Baur, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, C. Magneville and M. Viel,Lyman-alpha forests cool warm dark matter,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2016(2016) 012 [1512.01981]

work page arXiv 2016
[17]

Irˇ siˇ c et al.,New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-αforest data,Phys

V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M.G. Haehnelt, J.S. Bolton, S. Cristiani, G.D. Becker et al.,New constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-αforest data,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 023522 [1702.01764]

work page arXiv 2017
[18]

Villasenor, B

B. Villasenor, B. Robertson, P. Madau and E. Schneider,New constraints on warm dark matter from the Lyman-αforest power spectrum,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 023502 [2209.14220]

work page arXiv 2023
[19]

M. Viel, J. Weller and M.G. Haehnelt,Constraints on the primordial power spectrum from high-resolution Lymanαforest spectra and WMAP,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.355(2004) L23 [astro-ph/0407294]

work page arXiv 2004
[20]

Kara¸ caylı, P

N.G. Kara¸ caylı, P. Martini et al.,DESI DR1 Lyα1D power spectrum: the optimal estimator measurement,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 004 [2505.07974]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Ravoux, M.-L

C. Ravoux, M.-L. Abdul-Karim, J.-M. Le Goff, E. Armengaud et al.,DESI DR1 Lyα1D power spectrum: the Fast Fourier Transform estimator measurement,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2025(2025) 079 [2505.09493]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Cosmological analysis of the DESI DR1 Lyman alpha 1D power spectrum

J. Chaves-Montero, A. Font-Ribera, P. McDonald, E. Armengaud, D. Chebat, C. Garcia-Quintero et al.,Cosmological analysis of the DESI DR1 Lyman alpha 1D power spectrum,arXiv e-prints(2026) arXiv:2601.21432 [2601.21432]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[23]

Chabanier, N

S. Chabanier, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, J.-M.L. Goff, E. Armengaud, J. Bautista et al.,The one-dimensional power spectrum from the SDSS DR14 Lyαforests,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2019(2019) 017

2019
[24]

Fernandez, S

M.A. Fernandez, S. Bird and M.-F. Ho,Cosmological constraints from the eBOSS Lyman-α forest using the PRIYA simulations,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2024(2024) 029 [2309.03943]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS

P. McDonald and A. Roy,Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS,JCAP0908(2009) 020 [0902.0991]

work page arXiv 2009
[26]

Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid

D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga,Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid,JCAP1207(2012) 051 [1004.2488]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[27]

and Foreman, Simon and Green, Daniel and Senatore, Leonardo , year =

J.J.M. Carrasco, S. Foreman, D. Green and L. Senatore,The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures at Two Loops,JCAP07(2014) 057 [1310.0464]

work page arXiv 2014
[28]

Ivanov,Lyman alpha forest power spectrum in effective field theory,Phys

M.M. Ivanov,Lyman alpha forest power spectrum in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 023507 [2309.10133]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

de Belsunce, J.M

R. de Belsunce, J.M. Sullivan and P. McDonald,Compressed 3D Lyman-αforest bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 063550 [2510.23597]

work page arXiv 2026
[30]

de Belsunce, S.-F

R. de Belsunce, S.-F. Chen, M.M. Ivanov, C. Ravoux, S. Chabanier, J. Sexton et al.,Precision measurements of EFT parameters and BAO peak shifts for the Lyman-αforest,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 063524 [2412.06892]. – 24 –

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Hadzhiyska, R

B. Hadzhiyska, R. de Belsunce, A. Cuceu, J. Guy, M.M. Ivanov, H. Coquinot et al.,Measuring and unbiasing the BAO shift in the Lyαforest with AbacusSummit,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.540(2025) 1960 [2503.13442]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Ivanov, M.W

M.M. Ivanov, M.W. Toomey and N.G. Kara¸ caylı,Fundamental Physics with the Lyman-Alpha Forest: Constraints on the Growth of Structure and Neutrino Masses from SDSS with Effective Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 091001 [2405.13208]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Taylor and T.D

A.N. Taylor and T.D. Kitching,Analytic methods for cosmological likelihoods,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.408(2010) 865 [1003.1136]

work page arXiv 2010
[34]

Hadzhiyska, K

B. Hadzhiyska, K. Wolz, S. Azzoni, D. Alonso, C. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, J. Ruiz-Zapatero et al., Cosmology with 6 parameters in the Stage-IV era: efficient marginalisation over nuisance parameters,The Open Journal of Astrophysics6(2023) 23 [2301.11895]

work page arXiv 2023
[36]

Gualdi, H

D. Gualdi, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, R.L. Schuhmann, M. Manera, B. Joachimi and O. Lahav,Enhancing BOSS bispectrum cosmological constraints with maximal compression,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.484(2019) 3713 [1806.02853]

work page arXiv 2019
[37]

Philcox, M.M

O.H.E. Philcox, M.M. Ivanov, M. Zaldarriaga, M. Simonovi´ c and M. Schmittfull,Fewer mocks and less noise: Reducing the dimensionality of cosmological observables with subspace projections,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043508 [2009.03311]

work page arXiv 2021
[38]

Kara¸ caylı, C

N.G. Kara¸ caylı, C. Ravoux, P. Martini, J.M. Le Goff, E. Armengaud, M. Abdul-Karim et al., DESI DR1 Lyα1D power spectrum: Validation of estimators,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2509.13593 [2509.13593]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

Almgren, J.B

A.S. Almgren, J.B. Bell, M.J. Lijewski, Z. Luki´ c and E. Van Andel,Nyx: A Massively Parallel AMR Code for Computational Cosmology,Astrophys. J.765(2013) 39 [1301.4498]

work page arXiv 2013
[40]

Sexton, Z

J. Sexton, Z. Lukic, A. Almgren, C. Daley, B. Friesen, A. Myers et al.,Nyx: A massively parallel amr code for computational cosmology,Journal of Open Source Software6(2021) 3068

2021
[41]

Chabanier, C

S. Chabanier, C. Ravoux, L. Latrille, J. Sexton, ´E. Armengaud, J. Bautista et al.,The ACCEL2 project: simulating Lyman-αforest in large-volume hydrodynamical simulations,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.534(2024) 2674 [2407.04473]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

Planck Collaboration, P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al., Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.594(2016) A13 [1502.01589]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[43]

Friesen, A

B. Friesen, A. Almgren, Z. Luki´ c, G. Weber, D. Morozov, V. Beckner et al.,In situ and in-transit analysis of cosmological simulations,Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology3 (2016) 4

2016
[44]

Bolton, E

J.S. Bolton, E. Puchwein, D. Sijacki, M.G. Haehnelt, T.-S. Kim, A. Meiksin et al.,The Sherwood simulation suite: overview and data comparisons with the Lymanαforest at redshifts 2≤z≤5,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.464(2017) 897 [1605.03462]

work page arXiv 2017
[45]

Springel,The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2,Mon

V. Springel,The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.364 (2005) 1105 [astro-ph/0505010]

work page arXiv 2005
[46]

Givans, A

J.J. Givans, A. Font-Ribera, A. Slosar, L. Seeyave, C. Pedersen, K.K. Rogers et al., Non-linearities in the Lyman-αforest and in its cross-correlation with dark matter halos,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2022(2022) 070 [2205.00962]

work page arXiv 2022
[47]

Luki´ c, C.W

Z. Luki´ c, C.W. Stark, P. Nugent, M. White, A.A. Meiksin and A. Almgren,The Lymanα forest in optically thin hydrodynamical simulations,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.446(2015) 3697 [1406.6361]. – 25 –

work page arXiv 2015
[48]

Planck Collaboration, P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown et al.,Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.571(2014) A16 [1303.5076]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[49]

Toward a Measurement of the Cosmological Geometry at z ∼ 2: Predicting Lyα Forest Correlation in Three Dimensions and the Potential of Future Data Sets

P. McDonald,Toward a Measurement of the Cosmological Geometry at z ˜2: Predicting Lyα Forest Correlation in Three Dimensions and the Potential of Future Data Sets,Astrophys. J. 585(2003) 34 [astro-ph/0108064]

work page arXiv 2003
[50]

DESI Collaboration,Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.14745 [2503.14745]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[51]

Ross et al.,The construction of large-scale structure catalogs for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,J

A.J. Ross et al.,The construction of large-scale structure catalogs for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 125 [2405.16593]

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

The Galaxy Power Spectrum and Bispectrum in Redshift Space

V. Desjacques, D. Jeong and F. Schmidt,The Galaxy Power Spectrum and Bispectrum in Redshift Space,JCAP12(2018) 035 [1806.04015]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[53]

Chudaykin and M.M

A. Chudaykin and M.M. Ivanov,Lyman alpha forest-halo cross-correlations in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083515 [2501.04770]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Dembinski, P

H. Dembinski, P. Ongmongkolkul, C. Deil, H. Schreiner, M. Feickert, Andrew et al., scikit-hep/iminuit: v2.16.0,Zenodo(2022) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6998452 [10.5281/zenodo.6998452]

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.6998452 2022
[55]

de Belsunce, M.M

R. de Belsunce, M.M. Ivanov, J.M. Sullivan, K. Akitsu and S.-F. Chen,Modeling the Cosmological Lyman-αForest at the Field Level,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 101001 [2507.00284]

work page arXiv 2026
[56]

Cuceu, A

A. Cuceu, A. Font-Ribera, B. Joachimi and S. Nadathur,Cosmology beyond BAO from the 3D distribution of the Lyman-αforest,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.506(2021) 5439 [2103.14075]

work page arXiv 2021
[57]

Pedersen, A

C. Pedersen, A. Font-Ribera, K.K. Rogers, P. McDonald, H.V. Peiris, A. Pontzen et al.,An emulator for the Lyman-αforest in beyond-ΛCDM cosmologies,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2021(2021) 033 [2011.15127]

work page arXiv 2021
[58]

S. Bird, M. Fernandez, M.-F. Ho, M. Qezlou, R. Monadi, Y. Ni et al.,PRIYA: a new suite of Lyman-αforest simulations for cosmology,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2023(2023) 037 [2306.05471]

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Chaves-Montero, L

J. Chaves-Montero, L. Cabayol-Garcia, M. Lokken, A. Font-Ribera, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al., ForestFlow: predicting the Lyman-αforest clustering from linear to nonlinear scales,Astron. Astrophys.694(2025) A187 [2409.05682]

work page arXiv 2025
[60]

Zaldarriaga, U

M. Zaldarriaga, U. Seljak and L. Hui,Correlations in the LyαForest: Testing the Gravitational Instability Paradigm,The Astrophysical Journal551(2001) 48

2001
[61]

Mandelbaum, P

R. Mandelbaum, P. McDonald, U. Seljak and R. Cen,Precision cosmology from the Lyman-alpha forest: Power spectrum and bispectrum,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.344(2003) 776 [astro-ph/0302112]

work page arXiv 2003
[62]

Kara¸ caylı, P

N.G. Kara¸ caylı, P. Martini, D.H. Weinberg, S. Ferraro, R. de Belsunce, J. Aguilar et al.,CMB lensing and Lyαforest cross bispectrum from DESI’s first-year quasar sample,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 063505 [2405.14988]

work page arXiv 2024
[63]

de Belsunce, B

R. de Belsunce, B. Hadzhiyska and M.M. Ivanov,Bridging Simulations and EFT: A Hybrid Model of the Lyman-Alpha Forest Field,2512.13681

work page arXiv
[64]

McDonald, U

P. McDonald, U. Seljak, R. Cen, D. Shih, D.H. Weinberg, S. Burles et al.,The Linear Theory Power Spectrum from the LyαForest in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,Astrophys. J.635(2005) 761 [astro-ph/0407377]

work page arXiv 2005
[65]

Sailer, J

N. Sailer, J. Kim, S. Ferraro, M.S. Madhavacheril, M. White, I. Abril-Cabezas et al., Cosmological constraints from the cross-correlation of DESI Luminous Red Galaxies with CMB – 26 – lensing from Planck PR4 and ACT DR6,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 008 [2407.04607]

work page arXiv 2025
[66]

Woodbury,Inverting modified matrices, inMemorandum Rept

M.A. Woodbury,Inverting modified matrices, inMemorandum Rept. 42, Statistical Research Group, p. 4, Princeton Univ. (1950)

1950
[67]

Kasai,An analytical approximation of the growth function in Friedmann-Lemaˆ ıtre universes,arXiv e-prints(2010) [1012.2671]

M. Kasai,An analytical approximation of the growth function in Friedmann-Lemaˆ ıtre universes,arXiv e-prints(2010) [1012.2671]

work page arXiv 2010
[68]

Fernandez, M.-F

M.A. Fernandez, M.-F. Ho and S. Bird,A multifidelity emulator for the Lyman-αforest flux power spectrum,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.517(2022) 3200 [2207.06445]

work page arXiv 2022
[69]

Walther, N

M. Walther, N. Sch¨ oneberg, S. Chabanier, E. Armengaud, J. Sexton, C. Y` eche et al., Emulating the Lyman-Alpha forest 1D power spectrum from cosmological simulations: new models and constraints from the eBOSS measurement,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025 (2025) 099 [2412.05372]

work page arXiv 2025
[70]

Pedersen, A

C. Pedersen, A. Font-Ribera and N.Y. Gnedin,Compressing the Cosmological Information in One-dimensional Correlations of the Lyman-αForest,Astrophys. J.944(2023) 223 [2209.09895]

work page arXiv 2023
[71]

Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby,Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models,Astrophys. J.538 (2000) 473 [astro-ph/9911177]

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[72]

James and M

F. James and M. Roos,Minuit: A System for Function Minimization and Analysis of the Parameter Errors and Correlations,Comput. Phys. Commun.10(1975) 343

1975
[73]

Heavens, R

A. Heavens, R. Jimenez and O. Lahav,Massive lossless data compression and multiple parameter estimation from galaxy spectra,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.317(2000) 965 [astro-ph/9911102]

work page arXiv 2000
[74]

Astropy: A Community Python Package for Astronomy

Astropy Collaboration,Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy,Astron. Astrophys.558(2013) A33 [1307.6212]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[75]

The Astropy Project: Building an inclusive, open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package

Astropy Collaboration,The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package,Astron. J.156(2018) 123 [1801.02634]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[76]

Astropy Collaboration,The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package,Astrophys. J. 935(2022) 167 [2206.14220]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[77]

Harris, K.J

C.R. Harris, K.J. Millman, S.J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau et al., Array programming with NumPy,Nature585(2020) 357

2020
[78]

Hunter,Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment,Computing in Science & Engineering9 (2007) 90

J.D. Hunter,Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment,Computing in Science & Engineering9 (2007) 90

2007
[79]

Large-Scale Structure of the Universe and Cosmological Perturbation Theory

F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztanaga and R. Scoccimarro,Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory,Phys. Rep.367(2002) 1 [astro-ph/0112551]. – 27 –

work page Pith review arXiv 2002