pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10064 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

On The Application of Linear Attention in Multimodal Transformers

Armin Gerami , Seyedehanita Madani , Ramani Duraiswami
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords linear attentionmultimodal transformersvision transformerscomputational efficiencyscaling lawszero-shot accuracyattention mechanismsvision-language models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Linear attention replaces softmax attention in multimodal transformers while reducing complexity from quadratic to linear and preserving identical scaling laws.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether linear attention can function as a practical substitute for standard attention inside vision-language transformer models. It demonstrates that the substitution lowers computational demands from quadratic growth with sequence length to linear growth. Experiments cover three sizes of vision transformer backbones trained on a large image-text collection and measured by zero-shot accuracy on a standard classification benchmark. The results indicate that performance continues to improve with scale at the same rate observed under softmax attention. This finding matters because it suggests a route to building larger multimodal systems without the usual rapid rise in required resources.

Core claim

Linear attention can be integrated into multimodal transformer architectures such as ViT variants, yielding substantial reductions in computational overhead from quadratic to linear in sequence length, while maintaining competitive zero-shot accuracy on ImageNet-21K after training on LAION-400M and following the same scaling laws as softmax attention.

What carries the argument

Linear attention, which reformulates the attention computation to achieve linear scaling with sequence length rather than quadratic scaling.

If this is right

  • Multimodal models can handle longer sequences or higher-resolution inputs at manageable cost.
  • The established pattern of performance gains from increasing model size remains available under linear attention.
  • Training runs on datasets the size of LAION-400M become more practical for base and large vision transformer backbones.
  • Efficiency improvements hold consistently across the tested range of model scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar linear-attention substitutions could be tested in other multimodal settings such as video or audio processing.
  • Resource-limited teams may find it easier to experiment with large vision-language models if linear attention is adopted.
  • Future work could measure whether the linear-complexity benefit persists when fine-tuning on downstream tasks beyond zero-shot evaluation.

Load-bearing premise

The specific ViT-S/16, ViT-B/16, and ViT-L/16 models trained on LAION-400M and evaluated on ImageNet-21K zero-shot accuracy are representative enough to support general claims for linear attention across multimodal frameworks.

What would settle it

A clear deviation from softmax scaling laws or a significant drop in zero-shot accuracy when linear attention is applied to a larger model size, different architecture, or alternative large-scale dataset.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10064 by Armin Gerami, Ramani Duraiswami, Seyedehanita Madani.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Forward and backward pass time for a single attention 1.0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Training metrics for ViT-S/16, ViT-B/16, and ViT-L/16 models trained on LAION-400M using four NVIDIA A5500 GPUs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Training loss scaling with model size for ViTs on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multimodal Transformers serve as the backbone for state-of-the-art vision-language models, yet their quadratic attention complexity remains a critical barrier to scalability. In this work, we investigate the viability of Linear Attention (LA) as a high-efficiency alternative within multimodal frameworks. By integrating LA, we reduce the computational overhead from quadratic to linear relative to sequence length while preserving competitive performance. We evaluate our approach across ViT-S/16, ViT-B/16, and ViT-L/16 architectures trained on the LAION-400M dataset, with validation focused on ImageNet-21K zero-shot accuracy. Our systematic evaluation demonstrates that Linear Attention not only yields significant computational savings but also adheres to the same scaling laws as standard softmax attention. These findings position Linear Attention as a robust, scalable solution for next-generation multimodal Transformers tasked with processing increasingly large and complex datasets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates Linear Attention (LA) as an efficient substitute for softmax attention in multimodal Transformers. It claims that replacing softmax attention with LA reduces complexity from quadratic to linear in sequence length, yields significant computational savings, preserves competitive performance, and follows the same scaling laws as standard attention. The evaluation uses ViT-S/16, ViT-B/16, and ViT-L/16 models trained on LAION-400M, with ImageNet-21K zero-shot accuracy as the primary metric.

Significance. If the central empirical claims were substantiated with quantitative evidence, the work would be significant for practical scaling of multimodal models, as linear attention could remove a key computational barrier while retaining the predictable power-law behavior observed in standard Transformers. The absence of such evidence in the current manuscript limits its immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that LA 'adheres to the same scaling laws as standard softmax attention' and yields 'competitive performance' is asserted without any reported numbers, baselines, error bars, or description of how scaling exponents were measured (e.g., loss ~ N^α fits across the three model sizes).
  2. [Evaluation] Evaluation section (implied by abstract): the reported experiments are confined to isolated vision encoders (ViT-S/16, ViT-B/16, ViT-L/16) trained on LAION-400M and measured by ImageNet-21K zero-shot accuracy. This does not test whether the linear approximation preserves the same scaling exponents once language modeling heads, cross-attention, and multimodal metrics (e.g., VQA or retrieval) are introduced, which is required to support the multimodal-Transformer claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below, providing clarifications based on the content of the full paper and indicating revisions made to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that LA 'adheres to the same scaling laws as standard softmax attention' and yields 'competitive performance' is asserted without any reported numbers, baselines, error bars, or description of how scaling exponents were measured (e.g., loss ~ N^α fits across the three model sizes).

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including key quantitative results. The full manuscript reports zero-shot ImageNet-21K accuracies for ViT-S/16, ViT-B/16, and ViT-L/16 under both linear and softmax attention (with standard deviations across multiple runs), along with FLOPs and throughput measurements demonstrating computational savings. Scaling exponents were obtained by fitting power-law models of the form loss ∝ N^α to the validation loss curves across the three model scales for each attention mechanism; the resulting α values and their standard errors are reported in Section 4.2, showing no statistically significant difference. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the abstract to summarize these metrics, baselines, and the fitting procedure while remaining within length constraints. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Evaluation] Evaluation section (implied by abstract): the reported experiments are confined to isolated vision encoders (ViT-S/16, ViT-B/16, ViT-L/16) trained on LAION-400M and measured by ImageNet-21K zero-shot accuracy. This does not test whether the linear approximation preserves the same scaling exponents once language modeling heads, cross-attention, and multimodal metrics (e.g., VQA or retrieval) are introduced, which is required to support the multimodal-Transformer claim.

    Authors: The study deliberately isolates the vision encoder, which is the dominant compute component in multimodal transformers and is pretrained on the multimodal LAION-400M image-text corpus. ImageNet-21K zero-shot accuracy is the standard metric used to assess representation quality in this pretraining regime. We acknowledge that direct tests with language modeling heads, cross-attention layers, and downstream multimodal tasks such as VQA would provide additional evidence of transfer. The revised manuscript adds a dedicated limitations and future-work paragraph that explicitly discusses the scope of the current experiments, the expected applicability of the observed scaling behavior to full multimodal architectures, and the computational reasons why complete end-to-end multimodal ablations were not included in this work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical study with no derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical evaluation of Linear Attention integrated into ViT-S/16, ViT-B/16, and ViT-L/16 models trained on LAION-400M, validated via ImageNet-21K zero-shot accuracy. The claim that Linear Attention 'adheres to the same scaling laws as standard softmax attention' is framed as a demonstration from systematic evaluation rather than any mathematical derivation, fitted parameter, or prediction that reduces to inputs by construction. No equations, ansatzes, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations are invoked in the provided text to support load-bearing steps. The work is self-contained as an experimental comparison of computational savings and performance, with no reduction of outputs to the inputs via definition or fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract contains no mathematical derivations, free parameters, axioms, or new postulated entities. The work rests on standard linear attention mechanisms and empirical training on public datasets.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5448 in / 1073 out tokens · 76565 ms · 2026-05-10T17:08:43.515390+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Simple linear attention language models balance the recall-throughput tradeoff

    Simran Arora, Sabri Eyuboglu, Michael Zhang, Aman Timalsina, Silas Alberti, Dylan Zinsley, James Zou, Atri Rudra, and Christopher R ´e. Simple linear attention lan- guage models balance the recall-throughput tradeoff.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18668, 2024. 1

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Lan- guage models are few-shot learners.Advances in neural in- formation processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020

    Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Sub- biah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakan- tan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Lan- guage models are few-shot learners.Advances in neural in- formation processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020. 2

    1901

  3. [3]

    EfficientViT: Enhanced linear attention for high- resolution low-computation visual recognition.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.14756, 3(1), 2022

    Han Cai, Chuang Gan, and Song Han. Efficientvit: Enhanced linear attention for high-resolution low-computation visual recognition.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.14756, 3, 2022. 1

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Pali: A jointly-scaled multilingual language-image model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06794, 2022

    Xi Chen, Xiao Wang, Soravit Changpinyo, Anthony J Pier- giovanni, Piotr Padlewski, Daniel Salz, Sebastian Goodman, Adam Grycner, Basil Mustafa, Lucas Beyer, et al. Pali: A jointly-scaled multilingual language-image model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06794, 2022. 2

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Pali-3 vi- sion language models: Smaller, faster, stronger

    Xi Chen, Xiao Wang, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Jialin Wu, Paul V oigtlaender, Basil Mustafa, Sebastian Goodman, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Piotr Padlewski, et al. Pali-3 vision language models: Smaller, faster, stronger. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09199, 2023. 2

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Flashattention-2: Faster attention with better par- allelism and work partitioning

    Tri Dao. Flashattention-2: Faster attention with better par- allelism and work partitioning. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  7. [7]

    Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact at- tention with io-awareness.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:16344–16359, 2022

    Tri Dao, Dan Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra, and Christo- pher R´e. Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact at- tention with io-awareness.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:16344–16359, 2022. 2

    2022

  8. [8]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional trans- formers for language understanding

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional trans- formers for language understanding. InProceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the asso- ciation for computational linguistics: human language tech- nologies, volume 1 (long and short papers), pages 4171– 4186, 2019. 2

    2019

  9. [9]

    Flex Attention: A Programming Model for Generating Optimized Attention Kernels

    Juechu Dong, Boyuan Feng, Driss Guessous, Yanbo Liang, and Horace He. Flex attention: A programming model for generating optimized attention kernels.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05496, 2024. 2

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Trans- formers for image recognition at scale

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Syl- vain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Trans- formers for image recognition at scale. InInternational Con- ference on Learning Representations, 2020. 1

    2020

  11. [11]

    Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model

    Danny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Corey Lynch, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Ayzaan Wahid, Jonathan Tompson, Quan Vuong, Tianhe Yu, Wenlong Huang, et al. Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model. 2023. 2

    2023

  12. [12]

    Multi-modal transformer for video retrieval

    Valentin Gabeur, Chen Sun, Karteek Alahari, and Cordelia Schmid. Multi-modal transformer for video retrieval. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 214–229. Springer, 2020. 1

    2020

  13. [13]

    Transformer based linear attention with optimized gpu kernel implementation

    Armin Gerami and Ramani Duraiswami. Transformer based linear attention with optimized gpu kernel implementation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.21956, 2025. 3

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Fast: Factorizable attention for speeding up transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07901, 2024

    Armin Gerami, Monte Hoover, Pranav S Dulepet, and Ra- mani Duraiswami. Fast: Factorizable attention for speeding up transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07901, 2024. 2

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Flatten transformer: Vision transformer using focused linear attention

    Dongchen Han, Xuran Pan, Yizeng Han, Shiji Song, and Gao Huang. Flatten transformer: Vision transformer using focused linear attention. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5961– 5971, 2023. 1

    2023

  16. [16]

    Trans- former quality in linear time

    Weizhe Hua, Zihang Dai, Hanxiao Liu, and Quoc Le. Trans- former quality in linear time. InProceedings of the 39th In- ternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9099–

  17. [17]

    Open- clip, 2021

    Gabriel Ilharco, Mitchell Wortsman, Ross Wightman, Cade Gordon, Nicholas Carlini, Rohan Taori, Achal Dave, Vaishaal Shankar, Hongseok Namkoong, John Miller, Han- naneh Hajishirzi, Ali Farhadi, and Ludwig Schmidt. Open- clip, 2021. If you use this software, please cite it as below. 1, 2, 3

    2021

  18. [18]

    Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

    Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  19. [19]

    Transformers are RNNs: Fast autoregres- sive transformers with linear attention

    Angelos Katharopoulos, Apoorv Vyas, Nikolaos Pappas, and Franc ¸ois Fleuret. Transformers are RNNs: Fast autoregres- sive transformers with linear attention. InProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 5156–5165. PMLR, 2020. 1, 2

    2020

  20. [20]

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. InIn- ternational conference on machine learning, pages 19730– 19742. PMLR, 2023. 2

    2023

  21. [21]

    An inverse scal- ing law for clip training.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:49068–49087, 2023

    Xianhang Li, Zeyu Wang, and Cihang Xie. An inverse scal- ing law for clip training.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:49068–49087, 2023. 4

    2023

  22. [22]

    Are multimodal transformers robust to miss- ing modality? InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 18177– 18186, 2022

    Mengmeng Ma, Jian Ren, Long Zhao, Davide Testuggine, and Xi Peng. Are multimodal transformers robust to miss- ing modality? InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 18177– 18186, 2022. 1

    2022

  23. [23]

    The devil in linear transformer

    Zhen Qin, Xiaodong Han, Weixuan Sun, Dongxu Li, Ling- peng Kong, Nick Barnes, and Yiran Zhong. The devil in linear transformer. 2022. 1

    2022

  24. [24]

    Transnormerllm: A faster and better large language model with improved transnormer

    Zhen Qin, Dong Li, Weigao Sun, Weixuan Sun, Xuyang Shen, Xiaodong Han, Yunshen Wei, Baohong Lv, Xiao Luo, Yu Qiao, et al. Transnormerllm: A faster and better large language model with improved transnormer. 2023

    2023

  25. [25]

    Lightning attention-2: A free lunch for handling unlimited sequence lengths in large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04658, 2024

    Zhen Qin, Weigao Sun, Dong Li, Xuyang Shen, Weixuan Sun, and Yiran Zhong. Lightning attention-2: A free lunch for handling unlimited sequence lengths in large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04658, 2024. 1

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PmLR, 2021. 2

    2021

  27. [27]

    Imagenet-21k pretraining for the masses

    Tal Ridnik, Emanuel Ben-Baruch, Asaf Noy, and Lihi Zelnik-Manor. Imagenet-21k pretraining for the masses. In NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks, 2021. 3

    2021

  28. [28]

    Linear transformers are secretly fast weight programmers

    Imanol Schlag, Kazuki Irie, and J ¨urgen Schmidhuber. Linear transformers are secretly fast weight programmers. InInter- national conference on machine learning, pages 9355–9366. PMLR, 2021. 1

    2021

  29. [29]

    LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs

    Christoph Schuhmann, Richard Vencu, Romain Beaumont, Robert Kaczmarczyk, Clayton Mullis, Aarush Katta, Theo Coombes, Jenia Jitsev, and Aran Komatsuzaki. Laion-400m: Open dataset of clip-filtered 400 million image-text pairs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02114, 2021. 1, 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Flashattention-3: Fast and accurate attention with asynchrony and low-precision

    Jay Shah, Ganesh Bikshandi, Ying Zhang, Vijay Thakkar, Pradeep Ramani, and Tri Dao. Flashattention-3: Fast and accurate attention with asynchrony and low-precision. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 68658–68685, 2024. 2

    2024

  31. [31]

    Efficient attention: Attention with lin- ear complexities

    Zhuoran Shen, Mingyuan Zhang, Haiyu Zhao, Shuai Yi, and Hongsheng Li. Efficient attention: Attention with lin- ear complexities. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, pages 3531– 3539, 2021. 1

    2021

  32. [32]

    LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications

    Romal Thoppilan, Daniel De Freitas, Jamie Hall, Noam Shazeer, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Heng-Tze Cheng, Alicia Jin, Taylor Bos, Leslie Baker, Yu Du, et al. Lamda: Language models for dialog applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08239, 2022. 2

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Multimodal transformer for unaligned multimodal language sequences

    Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai, Shaojie Bai, Paul Pu Liang, J Zico Kolter, Louis-Philippe Morency, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Multimodal transformer for unaligned multimodal language sequences. InProceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pages 6558–6569,

  34. [34]

    Multimodal few-shot learning with frozen language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:200–212, 2021

    Maria Tsimpoukelli, Jacob L Menick, Serkan Cabi, SM Es- lami, Oriol Vinyals, and Felix Hill. Multimodal few-shot learning with frozen language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:200–212, 2021. 2

    2021

  35. [35]

    Li, Madian Khabsa, Han Fang, and Hao Ma

    Sinong Wang, Belinda Z. Li, Madian Khabsa, Han Fang, and Hao Ma. Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexity. 1

  36. [36]

    Multimodal trans- formers for real-time surgical activity prediction

    Keshara Weerasinghe, Seyed Hamid Reza Roodabeh, Kay Hutchinson, and Homa Alemzadeh. Multimodal trans- formers for real-time surgical activity prediction. In2024 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 13323–13330. IEEE, 2024. 1

    2024

  37. [37]

    Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(10):12113– 12132, 2023

    Peng Xu, Xiatian Zhu, and David A Clifton. Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(10):12113– 12132, 2023. 1

    2023

  38. [38]

    Gated Linear Attention Transformers with Hardware-Efficient Training

    Songlin Yang, Bailin Wang, Yikang Shen, Rameswar Panda, and Yoon Kim. Gated linear attention trans- formers with hardware-efficient training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06635, 2023. 1

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Gated Delta Networks: Improving Mamba2 with Delta Rule

    Songlin Yang, Jan Kautz, and Ali Hatamizadeh. Gated delta networks: Improving mamba2 with delta rule.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06464, 2024. 1

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024