pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10173 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cs.LG· physics.comp-ph

Continuous PT-Symmetry Breaking as a Design Variable for Giant Altermagnetic Spin Splitting

Kichan Chun , Gunn Kim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LGphysics.comp-ph
keywords altermagnetismspin splittingPT symmetrysymmetry breakingmagnetic motifsdensity functional theoryBayesian optimizationmaterial design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Treating PT-symmetry breaking as a continuous scalar allows quantitative design of altermagnets with giant spin-splitting energies from crystal coordinates alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that magnetic point-group analysis gives only a binary yes-or-no verdict on whether an altermagnet can exhibit spin splitting, which leaves the actual energy size unknown without full density functional theory calculations. It promotes sublattice symmetry breaking to the Motif Symmetry-Breaking Index, a single number computed directly from atomic positions that measures the continuous strength of PT-symmetry violation between antiparallel magnetic motifs. When this index is combined with motif packing fraction and the p/d electron ratio, the three quantities form a space in which Bayesian optimization recovers known high-splitting materials and flags new candidates such as square-planar FeS with 1.297 eV splitting. A reader would care because the method replaces qualitative symmetry classification with a practical, experimentally tunable optimization route that avoids repeated expensive calculations for every new composition.

Core claim

Sublattice symmetry breaking is promoted to the Motif Symmetry-Breaking Index, a continuous DFT-free scalar that quantifies PT-symmetry breaking between antiparallel magnetic motifs directly from crystal coordinates. SHAP analysis of an XGBoost surrogate trained on 3,851 DFT-labeled structures identifies MSBI, motif packing fraction, and p/d electron ratio as the dominant axes, each tied to a tunable experimental handle. Bayesian optimization over this space recovers alpha-NiS and proposes square-planar FeS (1.297 eV), octahedral CoS (1.103 eV), and FeAs (1.089 eV) as materials whose spin-splitting energies match or exceed that of CrSb.

What carries the argument

The Motif Symmetry-Breaking Index (MSBI), a continuous scalar that quantifies the degree of PT-symmetry breaking between antiparallel magnetic motifs using only crystal coordinates and thereby replaces binary symmetry classification with a tunable design variable.

Load-bearing premise

The three descriptors identified by SHAP analysis are sufficient to predict spin-splitting energy across material families and the XGBoost surrogate trained on binary structures generalizes reliably to new compositions.

What would settle it

Independent spin-polarized DFT calculations on the predicted square-planar FeS structure returning a spin-splitting energy substantially below 1.297 eV, or a new set of structures where MSBI shows no correlation with actual spin-splitting energy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10173 by Gunn Kim, Kichan Chun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Overview of the inverse-design workflow for high-SSE altermagnetic materials. (Left) Candidate structures are generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Three descriptors dominate SSE prediction. (a) Top-12 descriptors ranked by mean absolute SHAP value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. MSBI controls symmetry breaking and SSE. (a–c) SSE versus (a) MSBI, (b) MPF, and (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Packing and covalency jointly govern SSE magnitude. (a) SSE versus nearest motif-centroid distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. DFT validation of BO-selected candidates. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic point-group analysis classifies altermagnets but returns only a binary symmetry verdict, leaving spin-splitting energy (SSE) inaccessible without spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT). This binary ceiling is not fundamental. Sublattice symmetry breaking is promoted here to a continuous, DFT-free scalar -- the Motif Symmetry-Breaking Index (MSBI) -- that quantifies $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetry breaking between antiparallel magnetic motifs directly from crystal coordinates. SHAP analysis of an XGBoost surrogate trained on 3,851 DFT-labeled binary structures identifies three dominant descriptors: MSBI (symmetry-breaking axis), motif packing fraction MPF (superexchange axis), and the $p/d$ electron ratio (covalency axis), each mapping onto a directly tunable experimental handle. A controlled VO--CrSb comparison within the same P$6_3$/mmc host lattice demonstrates that composition alone boosts SSE sevenfold. Bayesian optimization over this three-axis space, followed by independent DFT validation, recovers $\alpha$-NiS (SSE $= 0.823$\,eV) as cross-validation against an independent symmetry-based prediction and identifies three previously unrecognized high-SSE candidates -- square-planar FeS (1.297\,eV), octahedral CoS (1.103\,eV), and FeAs (1.089\,eV) -- all matching or exceeding CrSb. Square-planar Fe--S is proposed as a transferable coordination motif for giant altermagnetic spin splitting, advancing altermagnet design from symmetry classification to continuous quantitative optimization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript promotes sublattice symmetry breaking to a continuous, DFT-free scalar called the Motif Symmetry-Breaking Index (MSBI) that quantifies PT-symmetry breaking between antiparallel magnetic motifs directly from crystal coordinates. An XGBoost surrogate trained on 3,851 DFT-labeled binary structures, with SHAP analysis, identifies MSBI, motif packing fraction (MPF), and p/d electron ratio as dominant descriptors. Bayesian optimization over this three-axis space, followed by independent DFT validation, recovers α-NiS and proposes new high-SSE candidates (square-planar FeS at 1.297 eV, octahedral CoS at 1.103 eV, FeAs at 1.089 eV), while a controlled VO-CrSb comparison in the same P6₃/mmc lattice claims a sevenfold SSE boost from composition tuning alone.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work advances altermagnet design from binary magnetic point-group classification to quantitative, continuous optimization using directly tunable experimental handles. The independent DFT validation of ML-optimized candidates and the explicit mapping of descriptors to physical axes (symmetry breaking, superexchange, covalency) provide a practical framework for materials discovery. The introduction of MSBI as a scalar design variable is a clear conceptual contribution that could accelerate spintronic material development.

major comments (2)
  1. [Machine-learning methodology and optimization section] The reliability of the Bayesian optimization step depends on the XGBoost surrogate's generalization. No train/test split details, R², MAE, or cross-validation scores on held-out structures are provided (abstract and apparent methods description), making it impossible to quantify extrapolation risk for motifs such as square-planar Fe-S outside the binary training distribution. This directly affects the trustworthiness of the three new high-SSE candidates.
  2. [Results (VO-CrSb comparison paragraph)] The sevenfold SSE boost is attributed to composition tuning in the controlled VO-CrSb comparison within the same P6₃/mmc host. Without the explicit SSE values for both compounds, the precise definition of the 'controlled' variables, or a table showing the decomposition into MSBI/MPF/p-d contributions, it is unclear whether the factor of seven is fully explained by the three-descriptor model or partly by other unaccounted structural differences.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The space-group notation P$6_3$/mmc in the abstract should be rendered consistently with the full-text LaTeX (e.g., P6₃/mmc) to avoid minor typesetting inconsistencies.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that the three descriptors 'map onto directly tunable experimental handles,' but a brief sentence linking each handle (e.g., how MSBI is tuned by motif distortion) would improve immediate readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be clarified and strengthened. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Machine-learning methodology and optimization section] The reliability of the Bayesian optimization step depends on the XGBoost surrogate's generalization. No train/test split details, R², MAE, or cross-validation scores on held-out structures are provided (abstract and apparent methods description), making it impossible to quantify extrapolation risk for motifs such as square-planar Fe-S outside the binary training distribution. This directly affects the trustworthiness of the three new high-SSE candidates.

    Authors: We agree that explicit performance metrics for the XGBoost surrogate are necessary to evaluate generalization. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated Methods subsection reporting the train/test split (80/20 random split on the 3,851 structures), test-set R² and MAE, and 5-fold cross-validation scores. These metrics will quantify extrapolation risk for motifs such as square-planar Fe-S. We note that all three proposed high-SSE candidates were subsequently validated by independent DFT calculations, providing an orthogonal confirmation of the surrogate predictions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (VO-CrSb comparison paragraph)] The sevenfold SSE boost is attributed to composition tuning in the controlled VO-CrSb comparison within the same P6₃/mmc host. Without the explicit SSE values for both compounds, the precise definition of the 'controlled' variables, or a table showing the decomposition into MSBI/MPF/p-d contributions, it is unclear whether the factor of seven is fully explained by the three-descriptor model or partly by other unaccounted structural differences.

    Authors: We accept that the current text does not supply the numerical SSE values or the requested decomposition. The revised version will state the explicit SSE values for both VO and CrSb in the P6₃/mmc lattice, define the controlled variables (identical space group and closely matched lattice parameters, differing only by composition), and include a table that decomposes the SSE difference into the individual contributions from MSBI, MPF, and p/d electron ratio. This will demonstrate that the sevenfold enhancement is accounted for by the three-descriptor model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; MSBI and surrogate optimization remain independent of DFT labels by construction

full rationale

MSBI is explicitly constructed as a DFT-free scalar from crystal coordinates alone, quantifying PT-symmetry breaking between motifs without reference to spin-splitting energies. The XGBoost model is trained on 3,851 DFT-computed SSE values to rank descriptors via SHAP, after which Bayesian optimization proposes candidates that receive separate, independent DFT validation (including recovery of α-NiS against an external symmetry-based benchmark). No equation or step reduces a reported prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim rest on self-citation or an imported uniqueness theorem. The derivation therefore uses external DFT computations as an independent benchmark rather than tautologically reproducing its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the new MSBI being a faithful proxy for spin-splitting energy, the representativeness of the 3,851 training structures, and the assumption that the three SHAP-selected descriptors dominate the physics without requiring full electronic-structure input.

free parameters (1)
  • XGBoost hyperparameters
    Hyperparameters of the surrogate model are not specified in the abstract and were presumably tuned to the DFT training data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption PT-symmetry breaking between antiparallel magnetic motifs can be quantified as a scalar directly from crystal coordinates without electronic-structure calculations.
    Stated explicitly as the basis for the DFT-free MSBI.
invented entities (1)
  • Motif Symmetry-Breaking Index (MSBI) no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a continuous, coordinate-derived measure of PT-symmetry breaking to replace binary symmetry classification.
    Newly defined scalar introduced in this work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 1671 out tokens · 78523 ms · 2026-05-10T16:27:31.814646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Motif Symmetry Breaking Index (MSBI) Altermagnetism requires the absence of degeneracy- protecting symmetry operations that map one magnetic sublattice onto the other while preserving the crystal potential[2, 7]. In collinear antiferromagnets, spin de- generacy is protected byPTsymmetry, which requires the spatial environments of the two sublattices to be...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Motif Packing Fraction (MPF) MPF measures the fractional unit-cell space occu- pied by the ligand cage. The motif dimensionality is determined by SVD of the mean-centered ligand coor- dinates: a motif is classified as planar (D motif = 2) when the singular-value spectrum has effective rank two, and as polyhedral (Dmotif = 3) otherwise. For three- dimensio...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19488475 2020

  3. [3]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci- ence advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Jungwirth, R

    T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. Mac- Donald, J. Sinova, and L. Šmejkal, Altermagnetism: an unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter, Newton (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Mazin and P

    I. Mazin and P. editors, Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. D. Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Reviews of modern physics 76, 323 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Hirohata, K

    A. Hirohata, K. Yamada, Y. Nakatani, I.-L. Prejbeanu, B. Diény, P. Pirro, and B. Hillebrands, Review on spin- tronics: Principles and device applications, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials509, 166711 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Physical Review X 12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, journal of the physical society of japan88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered mag- netic octupoles in d-wave altermagnets, Physical Review X14, 011019 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. Šmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty,et al., Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in crsb thin films, Nature Communications15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu,et al., Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet crsb, Physical Review Letters133, 206401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Krempask` y, L

    J. Krempask` y, L. Šmejkal, S. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov,et al., Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy, Nature626, 517 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic mnte, Physical Review B109, 115102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal,et al., Broken kramers degeneracyinaltermagneticmnte,Physicalreviewletters 132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin,et al., An anomalous hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nature Electronics5, 735 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    X. Peng, Y. Wang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Sun, Y. Su, C. Wu, T. Zhou, L. Liu, H. Wang,et al., Scaling behavior of magnetoresistance and hall resistivity in the altermag- net crsb, Physical Review B111, 144402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Y. Bai, X. Xiang, S. Pan, S. Zhang, H. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Han, G. Xu, and F. Xu, Nonlinear field dependence of hall effect and high-mobility multi-carrier transport in an altermagnet crsb, Applied Physics Letters126(2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Kluczyk, K

    K. Kluczyk, K. Gas, M. Grzybowski, P. Skupiński, M. Borysiewicz, T. Fąs, J. Suffczyński, J. Domagala, K. Grasza, A. Mycielski,et al., Coexistence of anoma- lous hall effect and weak magnetization in a nominally collinear antiferromagnet mnte, Physical Review B110, 155201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Z. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Chen, S. Hu, Y. Ji, Y. Yan, J. Du, Y. Li, L. He, X. Wang,et al., Fully field-free spin-orbit torque switching induced by spin splitting effect in alter- magnetic ruo2, Advanced Materials37, 2416712 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Dong, Z.-X

    M. Dong, Z.-X. Guo, and X.-G. Gong, Field-free per- pendicularmagnetizationswitchingbyaltermagnetswith collinear spin current, Physical Review B112, 094447 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Kapri, Spin currents in rashba altermagnets: From equilibriumtononlinearregimes,PhysicalReviewB112, 155422 (2025)

    P. Kapri, Spin currents in rashba altermagnets: From equilibriumtononlinearregimes,PhysicalReviewB112, 155422 (2025). 14

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 473 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y.Yao,Altermagnetism: Exploringnewfrontiersinmag- netism and spintronics, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2409327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Cheong and F.-T

    S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, Altermagnetism classi- fication, npj Quantum Materials10, 38 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    P. G. Radaelli, Tensorial approach to altermagnetism, Physical Review B110, 214428 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Yuan and A

    L.-D. Yuan and A. Zunger, Degeneracy removal of spin bands in collinear antiferromagnets with non- interconvertible spin-structure motif pair, Advanced Ma- terials35, 2211966 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    W. Li, C. Xu, M. Wang, M. Zou, W. Li, H. Wang, W. Jiang, and B. Wang, Large anomalous nernst effect in a metallic altermagnet crsb single crystal, Physical Re- view B112, L100401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    B. Rai, K. Patra, S. Bera, S. Kalimuddin, K. Deb, M. Mondal, P. Mahadevan, and N. Kumar, Direction- dependent conduction polarity in altermagnetic crsb, Ad- vanced Science , 2502226 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Urata, W

    T. Urata, W. Hattori, and H. Ikuta, High mobility charge transportinamulticarrieraltermagnetcrsb,PhysicalRe- view Materials8, 084412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    O. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Zakharov, S. Fromage, C. Fields, S. Heywood, R. Cousins, F. Mac- cherozzi,et al., Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- magnetism in mnte, Nature636, 348 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chi- ral split magnon in altermagnetic mnte, Physical Review Letters133, 156702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    V. C. Morano, Z. Maesen, S. E. Nikitin, J. Lass, D. G. Mazzone, and O. Zaharko, Absence of altermagnetic magnon band splitting in mnf 2, Physical Review Let- ters134, 226702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei,et al., A metallic room- temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nature Physics , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromagnets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Materials Today Physics32, 100991 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Sødequist and T

    J. Sødequist and T. Olsen, Two-dimensional altermag- nets from high throughput computational screening: Symmetry requirements, chiral magnons, and spin-orbit effects, Applied Physics Letters124(2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Z.-F. Gao, S. Qu, B. Zeng, Y. Liu, J.-R. Wen, H. Sun, P.-J.Guo,andZ.-Y.Lu,Ai-accelerateddiscoveryofalter- magneticmaterials,NationalScienceReview12,nwaf066 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    H. W. Kuhn, The hungarian method for the assignment problem, Naval research logistics quarterly2, 83 (1955)

    work page 1955

  40. [40]

    P. W. Anderson, New approach to the theory of superex- change interactions, Physical Review115, 2 (1959)

    work page 1959

  41. [41]

    J. M. Coey,Magnetism and magnetic materials(Cam- bridge university press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Zaanen, G

    J. Zaanen, G. Sawatzky, and J. Allen, Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds, Physical review letters55, 418 (1985)

    work page 1985

  43. [43]

    S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, A unified approach to in- terpreting model predictions, Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems30(2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Chen, Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, Cor- nell University (2016)

    T. Chen, Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, Cor- nell University (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    C. Zeni, R. Pinsler, D. Zügner, A. Fowler, M. Horton, X. Fu, Z. Wang, A. Shysheya, J. Crabbé, S. Ueda,et al., A generative model for inorganic materials design, Na- ture639, 624 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Mandal, A

    A. Mandal, A. Das, and B. Nanda, Deterministic role of chemical bonding in the formation of altermagnetism: Reflection from the correlated electron system nis, Phys- ical Review B112, 014420 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    T. E. Gore, Growth of single crystals of crowningshieldite (α-nis) by chemical-vapour transport, Journal of Crystal Growth648, 127912 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    C. Sun, M. Ma, J. Yang, Y. Zhang, P. Chen, W. Huang, and X. Dong, Phase-controlled synthesis of α-nis nanoparticles confined in carbon nanorods for high performance supercapacitors, Scientific reports4, 7054 (2014)

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    Tan, W.-D

    Y. Tan, W.-D. Xue, Y. Zhang, D.-X. He, W.-J. Wang, and R. Zhao, Solvothermal synthesis of hierarchicalα-nis particles as battery-type electrode materials for hybrid supercapacitors, Journal of Alloys and Compounds806, 1068 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    S. Liu, Q. Shi, J. Tong, S. Li, and M. Li, Controlled synthesis of sphericalα-nis and urchin-likeβ-nis mi- crostructures, Journal of Experimental Nanoscience9, 475 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Chun,Inverse Design of Altermagnetic Materials us- ing Coupled DFT-Machine Learning, Master’s thesis, Se- jong University, Seoul (2025)

    K. Chun,Inverse Design of Altermagnetic Materials us- ing Coupled DFT-Machine Learning, Master’s thesis, Se- jong University, Seoul (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Physical review B47, 558 (1993)

    work page 1993

  53. [53]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational materials science 6, 15 (1996)

    work page 1996

  54. [54]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Physical review B54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  55. [55]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Physi- cal review B50, 17953 (1994)

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Physical review b59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  57. [57]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradientapproximationmadesimple,Physicalreviewlet- ters77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  58. [58]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An lsda+ u study, Physical Review B57, 1505 (1998)

    work page 1998

  59. [59]

    Cococcioni and S

    M. Cococcioni and S. De Gironcoli, Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the lda+ u method, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics71, 035105 (2005)

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    A. Jain, G. Hautier, S. P. Ong, C. J. Moore, C. C. Fis- cher, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, Formation enthalpies by mixing gga and gga+ u calculations, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics84, 045115 (2011). 15

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    Kirklin, J

    S. Kirklin, J. E. Saal, B. Meredig, A. Thompson, J. W. Doak, M. Aykol, S. Rühl, and C. Wolverton, The open quantum materials database (oqmd): assessing the accu- racy of dft formation energies, npj Computational Mate- rials1, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    H. Pan, A. M. Ganose, M. Horton, M. Aykol, K. A. Persson, N. E. Zimmermann, and A. Jain, Benchmarking coordination number prediction algorithms on inorganic crystal structures, Inorganic chemistry60, 1590 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V. L. Chevrier, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, Python materials genomics (py- matgen): A robust, open-source python library for mate- rials analysis, Computational Materials Science68, 314 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    Bergstra, R

    J. Bergstra, R. Bardenet, Y. Bengio, and B. Kégl, Al- gorithms for hyper-parameter optimization, Advances in neural information processing systems24(2011)

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    Bocquet, T

    A. Bocquet, T. Mizokawa, T. Saitoh, H. Namatame, and A. Fujimori, Electronic structure of 3d-transition-metal compounds by analysis of the 2p core-level photoemission spectra, Physical Review B46, 3771 (1992)

    work page 1992

  66. [66]

    Imada, A

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions, Reviews of modern physics70, 1039 (1998)

    work page 1998

  67. [67]

    Tanaka, J

    M. Tanaka, J. Harbison, M. Park, Y. Park, T. Shin, and G. Rothberg, Epitaxial orientation and magnetic proper- ties of mnas thin films grown on (001) gaas: Template effects, Applied physics letters65, 1964 (1994)

    work page 1964

  68. [68]

    H. Wang, A. Pring, Y. Ngothai, and B. O’Neill, The ki- netics of theα→βtransition in synthetic nickel mono- sulfide, American Mineralogist91, 171 (2006)

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    McWhan, M

    D. McWhan, M. Marezio, J. Remeika, and P. Dernier, Pressure-temperature phase diagram and crystal struc- ture of nis, Physical Review B5, 2552 (1972)

    work page 1972