arxiv: 2604.10973 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.CL

Recognition: unknown

CFMS: A Coarse-to-Fine Multimodal Synthesis Framework for Enhanced Tabular Reasoning

Qixian Huang , Hongqiang Lin , Tong Fu , Yingsen Wang , Zhenghui Fu , Qirui Wang , Yiding Sun , Dongxu Zhang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.CL

keywords tabular reasoningmultimodal synthesiscoarse-to-fine frameworksymbolic reasoningquestion answeringfact verificationknowledge tupletable operations

0 comments

The pith

A two-stage framework first synthesizes a multi-perspective knowledge tuple with multimodal models then guides symbolic operations over tables.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that tabular reasoning improves when high-level visual and holistic perception is separated from precise symbolic steps. In the first stage an MLLM builds a single knowledge tuple that captures the table and question from multiple angles; this tuple then directs a symbolic engine through a short sequence of targeted table operations in the second stage. The separation is intended to give the model both the broad patterns that pure symbolic methods miss and the exact calculations that end-to-end models often get wrong. If the approach works, question answering and fact verification over large or semi-structured tables become more accurate and more stable even when the underlying language model is relatively small.

Core claim

By hierarchically decoupling high-level visual perception from granular symbolic reasoning, the coarse-to-fine synthesis of a multi-perspective knowledge tuple produces a dynamic reasoning map that lets a symbolic engine execute efficient, targeted operations on tabular data.

What carries the argument

The multi-perspective knowledge tuple synthesized once by the multimodal model in the coarse stage, which then serves as the dynamic reasoning map directing the symbolic engine's iterative operations in the fine stage.

Load-bearing premise

The knowledge tuple created by the multimodal model in the first stage is accurate enough and complete enough to guide the symbolic engine without introducing errors that cannot be corrected later.

What would settle it

A controlled test in which the coarse-stage tuple is deliberately replaced by a noisy or incomplete version and accuracy on large tables in WikiTQ or TabFact is measured to see whether the fine stage can still recover.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10973 by Dongxu Zhang, Hongqiang Lin, Qirui Wang, Qixian Huang, Tong Fu, Yiding Sun, Yingsen Wang, Zhenghui Fu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: An overview of the CFMS framework. The process begins with the Coarse Stage, where the initial table [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Performance of the proposed CFMS on WikiTQ for questions that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Reasoning over tabular data is a crucial capability for tasks like question answering and fact verification, as it requires models to comprehend both free-form questions and semi-structured tables. However, while methods like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) introduce reasoning chains, purely symbolic methodes are inherently limited by their blindness to holistic visual patterns. To address this, we propose the Coarse-to-Fine Multimodal Synthesis framework (CFMS), a novel two-stage paradigm that hierarchically decouples high-level visual perception from granular symbolic reasoning. In the Coarse Stage, CFMS leverages the Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to perform a one-time synthesis of a multi-perspective knowledge tuple. This tuple subsequently serves as a dynamic reasoning map to guide the fine stage, where a symbolic engine executes a targeted and efficient sequence of iterative operations over the table. Extensive experiments on the WikiTQ and TabFact benchmarks demonstrate that CFMS achieves competitive accuracy. The framework exhibits particular robustness when handling large tables and when instantiated with smaller backbone models, validating its effectiveness and generalizability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

CFMS splits tabular reasoning into one-shot MLLM tuple synthesis followed by symbolic table ops, a practical split that could help on large tables but whose gains rest on unreported numbers.

read the letter

The core idea is a two-stage setup where an MLLM first builds a multi-perspective knowledge tuple from the table and question, then a symbolic engine uses that tuple as a map for targeted operations. This cleanly separates visual pattern capture from precise table manipulation, which addresses the blindness of pure symbolic methods and the inefficiency of repeated CoT calls in MLLMs. The one-time synthesis step is a sensible efficiency move, and the robustness claims for large tables and smaller backbones make sense if the tuple really acts as a reliable guide without adding too much noise. Those are the parts that feel like honest incremental progress in hybrid multimodal-symbolic work. The experiments cite WikiTQ and TabFact, standard benchmarks, and the abstract says competitive accuracy plus better scaling behavior. If the full paper includes ablations that isolate the tuple's contribution, error rates on the coarse stage, and direct comparisons to strong CoT or symbolic baselines, that would be useful evidence. The main soft spot is that the tuple has to be accurate enough for the symbolic engine to correct any MLLM errors; without seeing hallucination rates or failure cases, it's hard to judge how often the map actually helps versus hurts. The paper does not appear to overclaim or hide circularity, and the citation pattern to prior CoT and symbolic work looks standard. This is worth a serious referee for anyone working on tabular QA or hybrid reasoning systems, because the framework is straightforward to implement and the benchmarks are appropriate. I would send it to review rather than desk reject, with the expectation that the authors supply the missing tables and analysis.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CFMS, a two-stage Coarse-to-Fine Multimodal Synthesis framework for tabular reasoning tasks such as question answering and fact verification. In the coarse stage, an MLLM synthesizes a multi-perspective knowledge tuple that acts as a dynamic reasoning map; in the fine stage, a symbolic engine performs targeted iterative operations on the table guided by this tuple. The central claim is that CFMS achieves competitive accuracy on the WikiTQ and TabFact benchmarks while showing particular robustness on large tables and when using smaller backbone models.

Significance. If the empirical results hold, the hybrid decoupling of high-level multimodal perception from precise symbolic execution would represent a useful advance for tabular reasoning, potentially improving robustness and efficiency over purely neural or purely symbolic baselines, especially in settings with varying table sizes or model scales.

major comments (1)

The abstract asserts competitive accuracy and robustness on WikiTQ and TabFact but supplies no numerical results, error bars, ablation studies, baseline comparisons, or implementation details. Without these in the experiments section, the central claim cannot be evaluated for soundness or effect size.

minor comments (2)

The abstract contains a typo: 'purely symbolic methodes' should be 'methods'.
The description of the multi-perspective knowledge tuple would benefit from an explicit definition or example of its structure (e.g., fields or format) to clarify how it functions as a 'dynamic reasoning map'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The major comment raises a valid point about the presentation of results, which we will address through targeted revisions to improve clarity and evaluability without altering the core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The abstract asserts competitive accuracy and robustness on WikiTQ and TabFact but supplies no numerical results, error bars, ablation studies, baseline comparisons, or implementation details. Without these in the experiments section, the central claim cannot be evaluated for soundness or effect size.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including specific numerical results to immediately support the claims. In the revision, we will update the abstract to report key accuracies (e.g., CFMS performance on WikiTQ and TabFact), mention baseline comparisons, and note robustness findings. The experiments section (Section 4) already contains baseline comparisons against neural and symbolic methods, ablation studies on the multi-perspective knowledge tuple and iterative symbolic operations, and dedicated robustness analyses for large tables and smaller backbone models. However, we acknowledge that error bars, expanded implementation details (such as exact prompts and hyperparameters), and more explicit effect size discussions could be presented more prominently. We will revise the experiments section to incorporate these elements, including additional summary tables, to ensure the claims are fully evaluable. This constitutes a major revision to the presentation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The CFMS framework is presented as an empirical two-stage method (MLLM-based coarse synthesis of a knowledge tuple followed by symbolic fine-stage operations) whose central claims rest on benchmark experiments rather than any derivation chain. No equations, fitted parameters, self-definitional reductions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text; the approach is introduced as a novel paradigm without reducing predictions or uniqueness results to its own inputs by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the framework rests on the assumption that MLLMs can reliably synthesize useful multi-perspective tuples and that these tuples can guide symbolic operations without error propagation.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Multimodal LLMs can perform a one-time synthesis of a multi-perspective knowledge tuple from tables and questions that serves as an effective reasoning map.
Invoked in the description of the Coarse Stage.

invented entities (1)

multi-perspective knowledge tuple no independent evidence
purpose: Dynamic reasoning map to guide the fine-stage symbolic engine.
New entity introduced by the framework to bridge visual perception and symbolic reasoning.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1327 out tokens · 23493 ms · 2026-05-10T16:14:51.951234+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

A survey of table reasoning with large language models,

Xuanliang Zhang, Dingzirui Wang, Longxu Dou, Qingfu Zhu, and Wanxiang Che, “A survey of table reasoning with large language models,”Frontiers of Computer Science, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 199348, 2025

2025
[2]

Large language models are versatile decomposers: Decomposing evidence and questions for table-based reasoning,

Yunhu Ye, Binyuan Hui, Min Yang, Binhua Li, Fei Huang, and Yongbin Li, “Large language models are versatile decomposers: Decomposing evidence and questions for table-based reasoning,” inProceedings of the 46th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, 2023, pp. 174–184

2023
[3]

Tables as texts or images: Evaluating the table reasoning ability of llms and mllms,

Naihao Deng, Zhenjie Sun, Ruiqi He, Aman Sikka, Yulong Chen, Lin Ma, Yue Zhang, and Rada Mihalcea, “Tables as texts or images: Evaluating the table reasoning ability of llms and mllms,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12424, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[4]

Findings of the association for computational linguistics: Emnlp 2024,

Yaser Al-Onaizan, Mohit Bansal, and Yun-Nung Chen, “Findings of the association for computational linguistics: Emnlp 2024,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, 2024

2024
[5]

Chain-of-table: Evolving tables in the reasoning chain for table understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04398, 2024

Zilong Wang, Hao Zhang, Chun-Liang Li, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Vincent Perot, Zifeng Wang, Lesly Miculicich, Yasuhisa Fujii, Jingbo Shang, Chen-Yu Lee, et al., “Chain-of-table: Evolving tables in the rea- soning chain for table understanding,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04398, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[6]

Tab-cot: Zero-shot tabular chain of thought,

Ziqi Jin and Wei Lu, “Tab-cot: Zero-shot tabular chain of thought,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17812, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[7]

A., and Yu, T

Zhoujun Cheng, Tianbao Xie, Peng Shi, Chengzu Li, Rahul Nadkarni, Yushi Hu, Caiming Xiong, Dragomir Radev, Mari Ostendorf, Luke Zettlemoyer, et al., “Binding language models in symbolic languages,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02875, 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[8]

Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning: A comprehensive survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12605, 2025

Yaoting Wang, Shengqiong Wu, Yuecheng Zhang, Shuicheng Yan, Ziwei Liu, Jiebo Luo, and Hao Fei, “Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning: A comprehensive survey, 2025,”URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2503.12605, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[9]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17521 , year=

Simin Chen, Yiming Chen, Zexin Li, Yifan Jiang, Zhongwei Wan, Yixin He, Dezhi Ran, Tianle Gu, Haizhou Li, Tao Xie, et al., “Recent advances in large langauge model benchmarks against data contamination: From static to dynamic evaluation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17521, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Visual instruction tuning,

Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee, “Visual instruction tuning,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 36, pp. 34892–34916, 2023

2023
[11]

Chart-based rea- soning: Transferring capabilities from llms to vlms,

Victor Carbune, Hassan Mansoor, Fangyu Liu, Rahul Aralikatte, Gilles Baechler, Jindong Chen, and Abhanshu Sharma, “Chart-based rea- soning: Transferring capabilities from llms to vlms,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12596, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

Ascot: An adaptive self-correction chain-of-thought method for late-stage fragility in llms,

Dongxu Zhang, Ning Yang, Jihua Zhu, Jinnan Yang, Miao Xin, and Bao- liang Tian, “Ascot: An adaptive self-correction chain-of-thought method for late-stage fragility in llms,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05282, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al., “Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforce- ment learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948, 2025

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[14]

Instruct- blip: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning,

Wenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Tiong, Junqi Zhao, Weisheng Wang, Boyang Li, Pascale N Fung, and Steven Hoi, “Instruct- blip: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 36, pp. 49250–49267, 2023

2023
[15]

Internlm- xcomposer: A vision-language large model for advanced text-image comprehension and composition

Pan Zhang, Xiaoyi Dong, Bin Wang, Yuhang Cao, Chao Xu, Linke Ouyang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Haodong Duan, Songyang Zhang, Shuangrui Ding, et al., “Internlm-xcomposer: A vision-language large model for advanced text-image comprehension and composition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15112, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,

Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al., “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 24824–24837, 2022

2022
[17]

Fewshotqa: A simple framework for few-shot learning of question answering tasks using pre-trained text- to-text models,

Rakesh Chada and Pradeep Natarajan, “Fewshotqa: A simple framework for few-shot learning of question answering tasks using pre-trained text- to-text models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01951, 2021

work page arXiv 2021
[18]

Chain-of-thought compression should not be blind: V-skip for efficient multimodal reasoning via dual-path anchoring,

Dongxu Zhang, Yiding Sun, Cheng Tan, Wenbiao Yan, Ning Yang, Jihua Zhu, and Haijun Zhang, “Chain-of-thought compression should not be blind: V-skip for efficient multimodal reasoning via dual-path anchoring,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13879, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[19]

Not all queries need deep thought: Coficot for adaptive coarse-to-fine stateful refinement,

Dongxu Zhang, Hongqiang Lin, Yiding Sun, Pengyu Wang, Qirui Wang, Ning Yang, and Jihua Zhu, “Not all queries need deep thought: Coficot for adaptive coarse-to-fine stateful refinement,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.08251, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[20]

Lever: Learning to verify language- to-code generation with execution,

Ansong Ni, Srini Iyer, Dragomir Radev, Veselin Stoyanov, Wen-tau Yih, Sida Wang, and Xi Victoria Lin, “Lever: Learning to verify language- to-code generation with execution,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 26106–26128

2023
[21]

Pal: Program-aided language models,

Luyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon, Pengfei Liu, Yiming Yang, Jamie Callan, and Graham Neubig, “Pal: Program-aided language models,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 10764–10799

2023
[22]

Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projection

Bin Lin, Yang Ye, Bin Zhu, Jiaxi Cui, Munan Ning, Peng Jin, and Li Yuan, “Video-llava: Learning united visual representation by align- ment before projection,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10122, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[23]

Igasa: Integrated geometry-aware and skip- attention modules for enhanced point cloud registration,

Dongxu Zhang, Jihua Zhu, Shiqi Li, Wenbiao Yan, Haoran Xu, Peilin Fan, and Huimin Lu, “Igasa: Integrated geometry-aware and skip- attention modules for enhanced point cloud registration,”IEEE Trans- actions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2026

2026
[24]

Align then Adapt: Rethinking Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning in 4D Perception

Yiding Sun, Jihua Zhu, Haozhe Cheng, Chaoyi Lu, Zhichuan Yang, Lin Chen, and Yaonan Wang, “Align then adapt: Rethinking parameter-efficient transfer learning in 4d perception,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23069, 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[25]

Personalq: Select, quantize, and serve personalized diffusion models for efficient inference

Qirui Wang, Qi Guo, Yiding Sun, Junkai Yang, Dongxu Zhang, Shan- min Pang, and Qing Guo, “Personalq: Select, quantize, and serve personalized diffusion models for efficient inference,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.22943, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[26]

Cmhanet: A cross-modal hybrid attention network for point cloud registration,

Dongxu Zhang, Yingsen Wang, Yiding Sun, Haoran Xu, Peilin Fan, and Jihua Zhu, “Cmhanet: A cross-modal hybrid attention network for point cloud registration,”Neurocomputing, p. 133318, 2026

2026
[27]

Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables

Panupong Pasupat and Percy Liang, “Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.00305, 2015

work page arXiv 2015
[28]

ArXivabs/1909.02164(2019),https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 1989173392

Wenhu Chen, Hongmin Wang, Jianshu Chen, Yunkai Zhang, Hong Wang, Shiyang Li, Xiyou Zhou, and William Yang Wang, “Tabfact: A large-scale dataset for table-based fact verification,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.02164, 2019

work page arXiv 1909
[29]

GPT-4 Technical Report

Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al., “Gpt-4 technical report,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[30]

Language models are few-shot learners,

Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877– 1901, 2020

1901
[31]

Evaluating the text-to-sql capabilities of large language models

Nitarshan Rajkumar, Raymond Li, and Dzmitry Bahdanau, “Evaluating the text-to-sql capabilities of large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.00498, 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

Enhancing power grid resilience with blockchain-enabled vehicle-to-vehicle energy trading in renewable energy integration,

Yingsen Wang, Dongxu Zhang, Yixiao Li, Weihan Jiao, Guibin Wang, Juanjuan Zhao, Yan Qiang, and Keqin Li, “Enhancing power grid resilience with blockchain-enabled vehicle-to-vehicle energy trading in renewable energy integration,”IEEE Transactions on Industry Applica- tions, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 2037–2052, 2023

2037
[33]

Synergy through integration of digital cognitive tests and wearable devices for mild cognitive impairment screening,

Aoyu Li, Jingwen Li, Dongxu Zhang, Wei Wu, Juanjuan Zhao, and Yan Qiang, “Synergy through integration of digital cognitive tests and wearable devices for mild cognitive impairment screening,”Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 17, pp. 1183457, 2023

2023
[34]

Integrating image and gene-data with a semi-supervised attention model for prediction of kras gene mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer,

Yuting Xue, Dongxu Zhang, Liye Jia, Wanting Yang, Juanjuan Zhao, Yan Qiang, Long Wang, Ying Qiao, and Huajie Yue, “Integrating image and gene-data with a semi-supervised attention model for prediction of kras gene mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer,”Plos one, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. e0297331, 2024

2024
[35]

Pointcot: A multi-modal benchmark for explicit 3d geometric reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23945, 2026

Dongxu Zhang, Yiding Sun, Pengcheng Li, Yumou Liu, Hongqiang Lin, Haoran Xu, Xiaoxuan Mu, Liang Lin, Wenbiao Yan, Ning Yang, et al., “Pointcot: A multi-modal benchmark for explicit 3d geometric reasoning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23945, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[36]

Pointrft: Explicit reinforcement fine-tuning for point cloud few-shot learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.23957, 2026

Yankai Wang, Yiding Sun, Qirui Wang, Pengbo Li, Chaoyi Lu, and Dongxu Zhang, “Pointrft: Explicit reinforcement fine-tuning for point cloud few-shot learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.23957, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[37]

Hyperpoint: Multimodal 3d foundation model in hyperbolic space,

Yiding Sun, Haozhe Cheng, Chaoyi Lu, Zhengqiao Li, Minghong Wu, Huimin Lu, and Jihua Zhu, “Hyperpoint: Multimodal 3d foundation model in hyperbolic space,”Pattern Recognition, p. 112800, 2025

2025