pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13790 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.soft· math-ph· math.DS· math.MP

Spatial deformation of a ferromagnetic elastic rod

G. R. Krishna Chand Avatar , Vivekanand Dabade This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.softmath-phmath.DSmath.MP
keywords ferromagnetic elastic rodsmagnetoelastic couplingHamiltonian Hopf bifurcationlocalized bucklingphase portraitsspatial deformationhard and soft ferromagnetsCasimir reduction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Soft ferromagnetic rods exhibit the Hopf pitchfork bifurcation only for magnetoelastic parameters below 1/8, producing localized shapes with non-collinear straight segments unlike hard or purely elastic rods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates the total energy of an inextensible rod by adding Kirchhoff elastic strain energy to either magnetostatic energy for soft ferromagnets or exchange plus Zeeman energies for hard ferromagnets. It exploits circular cross-section symmetry and conserved Casimir quantities to reduce the three-dimensional equilibrium equations to a single-degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian whose only variable is the Euler polar angle. Phase portraits of this reduced system then classify the bifurcations and post-buckling shapes that appear under simultaneous tension, twist, and longitudinal magnetic field. A sympathetic reader would care because the difference between soft and hard materials determines whether modest magnetic fields can produce large, controllable spatial deformations suitable for actuators or sensors.

Core claim

Purely elastic and hard ferromagnetic rods undergo a supercritical Hamiltonian Hopf pitchfork bifurcation for all positive values of the relevant parameters, whereas soft ferromagnetic rods exhibit the same bifurcation only inside the interval 0 < K_dM < 1/8. Localized solutions, which correspond to homoclinic orbits, are constructed numerically; for soft rods these solutions display extended straight segments that are not collinear, a geometric feature produced directly by the magnetoelastic coupling term in the energy.

What carries the argument

The reduced single-degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian in the Euler polar angle obtained via Casimir invariants from circular symmetry and integrability, whose phase portraits classify all equilibria, bifurcations, and homoclinic orbits.

If this is right

  • Purely elastic and hard ferromagnetic rods undergo the supercritical Hopf pitchfork bifurcation under any positive tension and twist.
  • Soft ferromagnetic rods undergo the bifurcation only inside the narrow window 0 < K_dM < 1/8.
  • Helical and localized post-buckling load-deformation curves can be computed explicitly from the reduced Hamiltonian for each material class.
  • Localized modes of soft rods contain non-collinear straight segments that are absent in the elastic or hard-ferromagnetic cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The restricted bifurcation window for soft rods suggests that magnetic-field strength could be used as a design parameter to switch between helical and localized actuation modes.
  • The non-collinear geometry may produce measurable transverse forces or torques at the rod ends that are absent in ordinary elastic buckling.
  • Similar reductions might apply to rods with other cross-sections if additional symmetries or integrals can be identified.

Load-bearing premise

Circular cross-sectional symmetry together with integrability of the governing equations is sufficient to reduce every three-dimensional deformation to the dynamics of a single angular coordinate.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation in which a soft ferromagnetic rod under combined tension, twist, and longitudinal field forms a localized buckle whose extended segments remain collinear would contradict the predicted non-collinear geometry.

read the original abstract

Ferromagnetic elastic slender structures offer the potential for large actuation displacements under modest external magnetic fields, due to the magneto-mechanical coupling. This paper investigates the phase portraits of the Hamiltonian governing the three-dimensional deformation of inextensible ferromagnetic elastic rods subjected to combined terminal tension and twisting moment in the presence of a longitudinal magnetic field. The total energy functional is formulated by combining the Kirchhoff elastic strain energy with micromagnetic energy contributions appropriate to soft and hard ferromagnetic materials: magnetostatic (demagnetization) energy for the former, and exchange and Zeeman energies for the latter. Exploiting the circular cross-sectional symmetry and the integrable structure of the governing equations, conserved Casimir invariants are identified and the Hamiltonian is reduced to a single-degree-of-freedom system in the Euler polar angle. Analysis of the resulting phase portraits reveals that purely elastic and hard ferromagnetic rods undergo a supercritical Hamiltonian Hopf pitchfork bifurcation, whereas soft ferromagnetic rods exhibit this bifurcation only within a restricted range of the magnetoelastic parameter, $0<\tilde{K}_{dM}<1/8$. Both helical and localized post-buckling configurations are analyzed, and the corresponding load-deformation relationships are systematically characterized across a range of loading scenarios. Localized buckling modes, corresponding to homoclinic orbits in the Hamiltonian phase space, are constructed numerically. In contrast to the purely elastic case, the localized configurations of soft ferromagnetic rods exhibit non-collinear extended straight segments, a geometrically distinctive feature arising directly from the magnetoelastic coupling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a reduced Hamiltonian model for the spatial deformations of inextensible ferromagnetic elastic rods under combined tension, twist, and longitudinal magnetic field. Starting from the Kirchhoff elastic energy augmented by micromagnetic contributions—demagnetizing energy for soft ferromagnets and exchange plus Zeeman for hard—the authors exploit circular cross-section symmetry to identify Casimir invariants. This permits reduction to a single-degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian depending only on the Euler polar angle. Phase-portrait analysis of this reduced system identifies a supercritical Hamiltonian Hopf pitchfork bifurcation in purely elastic and hard ferromagnetic cases, while for soft ferromagnets the bifurcation occurs only for magnetoelastic parameters in (0, 1/8). The work further constructs helical and localized (homoclinic) solutions numerically and highlights that localized modes in soft rods feature non-collinear straight segments, a feature attributed to the magnetoelastic interaction.

Significance. If the reduction is exact, the results provide a clean, low-dimensional framework for understanding magnetoelastic buckling and localization in slender structures. This has potential significance for the design of magnetic soft robots and actuators, where large displacements are achieved via modest fields. The distinction in behavior between soft and hard materials, together with the explicit construction of homoclinic orbits and the geometric characterization of non-collinear segments, offers testable predictions. The approach builds on classical integrable elastica theory and extends it systematically to include magnetic effects without introducing free parameters beyond the magnetoelastic coefficient.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3 (Hamiltonian reduction and Casimir identification)] §3 (Hamiltonian reduction and Casimir identification): The central claims rest on the exact reduction to a 1DOF Hamiltonian in the Euler polar angle. The manuscript must explicitly verify that the magnetostatic (demagnetization) energy for soft ferromagnets Poisson-commutes with the two angular-momentum Casimirs inherited from the Kirchhoff rod; the demagnetization term is written in the lab frame and depends on the local tangent and curvature, so it is not obvious a priori that it is a function of the existing invariants. Without this verification (or the corresponding Poisson-bracket calculation), the reported bifurcation threshold 0 < K_dM < 1/8 and the non-collinear straight segments in the homoclinic orbits could be artifacts of an incomplete truncation. This is load-bearing for the distinction between soft and hard rods.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Throughout] Notation consistency: the magnetoelastic parameter appears as both K_dM and tilde{K}_dM; adopt a single symbol and update all equations, figures, and the abstract accordingly.
  2. [Phase-portrait figures] Figure clarity: phase portraits should be labeled with the specific values of the magnetoelastic parameter at which the bifurcation changes character (particularly the 1/8 threshold) to allow direct comparison with the analytic statements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will revise the paper accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the Hamiltonian reduction.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (Hamiltonian reduction and Casimir identification): The central claims rest on the exact reduction to a 1DOF Hamiltonian in the Euler polar angle. The manuscript must explicitly verify that the magnetostatic (demagnetization) energy for soft ferromagnets Poisson-commutes with the two angular-momentum Casimirs inherited from the Kirchhoff rod; the demagnetization term is written in the lab frame and depends on the local tangent and curvature, so it is not obvious a priori that it is a function of the existing invariants. Without this verification (or the corresponding Poisson-bracket calculation), the reported bifurcation threshold 0 < K_dM < 1/8 and the non-collinear straight segments in the homoclinic orbits could be artifacts of an incomplete truncation. This is load-bearing for the distinction between soft and hard rods.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the Poisson commutation is essential for rigor. The demagnetization energy for soft ferromagnets is formulated in the lab frame but, owing to the circular cross-section symmetry, depends only on the local tangent vector and its derivatives in a manner invariant under the SO(3) action generated by the angular-momentum Casimirs. In the revised manuscript we will insert the direct Poisson-bracket calculation showing that {H_demag, C_i} = 0 for both Casimirs C_i, confirming that the reduction to the single-degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian in the Euler polar angle remains exact. This addition will also clarify why the bifurcation threshold 0 < K_dM < 1/8 and the non-collinear straight segments in the homoclinic solutions are intrinsic to the magnetoelastic coupling rather than truncation artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from energy functional through symmetry-based reduction to phase-portrait analysis without fitting or self-referential collapse

full rationale

The paper starts from an explicit total energy (Kirchhoff elastic plus micromagnetic terms for soft/hard cases), invokes circular cross-section symmetry to identify Casimir invariants, reduces the Hamiltonian to 1DOF in the Euler angle, and extracts bifurcation thresholds and homoclinic features directly from the resulting phase portraits. The restricted interval 0 < K_dM < 1/8 for soft rods and the non-collinear straight segments are outputs of that analysis rather than inputs presupposed by definition or by a fitted parameter renamed as prediction. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, an ansatz smuggled via prior work, or a renaming of a known empirical pattern; the integrability claim is asserted from the governing equations themselves and is not shown to be tautological in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard Kirchhoff rod theory and established micromagnetic energy expressions together with one key parameter whose range is delimited by the analysis; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • magnetoelastic parameter K_dM
    Dimensionless parameter measuring magnetoelastic coupling strength; the paper identifies the interval 0 < K_dM < 1/8 as the only regime in which soft ferromagnetic rods exhibit the reported bifurcation.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The rod possesses circular cross-sectional symmetry that, together with the integrable structure of the governing equations, yields conserved Casimir invariants permitting reduction to a single-degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian in the Euler polar angle.
    Invoked explicitly to obtain the phase portraits used for all bifurcation and mode analysis.
  • domain assumption The total energy is the sum of Kirchhoff elastic strain energy and the appropriate micromagnetic contributions (magnetostatic/demagnetization for soft ferromagnets; exchange plus Zeeman for hard ferromagnets).
    Stated as the starting point for the Hamiltonian formulation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5575 in / 1766 out tokens · 60511 ms · 2026-05-10T13:20:55.264483+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dover Civil and Mechanical Engineering

    Timoshenko, S.P., Gere, J.M.: Theory of Elastic Stability. Dover Civil and Mechanical Engineering. Dover Publications, New York (2012). https://books.google.co.in/books?id=98B6JOW2HiUC

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Journal of Elasticity157(1) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10659-024-10100-w

    Avatar, G.R.K.C., Dabade, V.: Deformation of a planar ferromagnetic elas- tic ribbon. Journal of Elasticity157(1) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10659-024-10100-w

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1–12 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Avatar, G.R.K.C., Dabade, V.: Kirchhoff’s analogy for a planar deformable fer- romagnetic rod. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1–12 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1115/1.4068252

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Science337(6098), 1087–1091 (2012) https://doi

    Gerbode, S.J., Puzey, J.R., McCormick, A.G., Mahadevan, L.: How the cucumber tendril coils and overwinds. Science337(6098), 1087–1091 (2012) https://doi. org/10.1126/science.1223304

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1223304 2012

  5. [5]

    Scientific Reports9(1) (2019) https://doi

    Feng, J., Zhang, W., Liu, C., Guo, M., Zhang, C.: Homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits in climbing cucumber tendrils. Scientific Reports9(1) (2019) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-019-41487-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41487-5 2019

  6. [6]

    Nonlinear Dynamics112(6), 4147–4168 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09100-7

    Wu, Z., Zhang, W., Yuan, R., Liu, J.: Buckling and dynamic analysis of drill string system in horizontal wells. Nonlinear Dynamics112(6), 4147–4168 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09100-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11071-023-09100-7 2024

  7. [7]

    Engineering Failure Analysis15(1–2), 142–153 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.019

    Ermolaeva, N.S., Regelink, J., Krutzen, M.P.M.: Hockling behaviour of single- and multiple-rope systems. Engineering Failure Analysis15(1–2), 142–153 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.019 2008

  8. [8]

    IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering15(2), 72–83 (1990) https://doi.org/10

    Coyne, J.: Analysis of the formation and elimination of loops in twisted cable. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering15(2), 72–83 (1990) https://doi.org/10. 1109/48.50692

    work page 1990

  9. [9]

    Acta Mechanica Sinica39(11) (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10409-023-22498-x

    Liu, L., Yan, Z., He, Y., Liu, D.: On the configuration evolution of soft filaments under combined tension and torsion. Acta Mechanica Sinica39(11) (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10409-023-22498-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10409-023-22498-x 2023

  10. [10]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Thompson, J.M.T., Champneys, A.: From helix to localized writhing in the tor- sional post-buckling of elastic rods. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences452(1944), 117–138 47 (1996)

    work page 1944

  11. [11]

    Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 480(2282) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2023.0719

    Hu, J., Teng, J., Liu, L., Liu, D.: Toward a further understanding of the loop formation and elimination in twisted filament: experiments and validation. Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 480(2282) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2023.0719

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2023.0719 2024

  12. [12]

    SIAM Jour- nal on Applied Mathematics59(1), 198–221 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1137/ s0036139996306833

    Champneys, A.R., Heijden, G.H.M., Thompson, J.M.T.: The spatial complex- ity of localized buckling in rods with noncircular cross section. SIAM Jour- nal on Applied Mathematics59(1), 198–221 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1137/ s0036139996306833

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Champneys, A., Thompson, J.M.T.: A multiplicity of localized buckling modes for twisted rod equations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences452(1954), 2467–2491 (1996)

    work page 1954

  14. [14]

    Physical Review E84(1) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.84.011605

    Audoly, B.: Localized buckling of a floating elastica. Physical Review E84(1) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.84.011605

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.84.011605 2011

  15. [15]

    ACS Nano14(10), 12877–12884 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03695

    Peacock, C., Lee, E., Beral, T., Cisek, R., Tokarz, D., Kreplak, L.: Buckling and torsional instabilities of a nanoscale biological rope bound to an elastic substrate. ACS Nano14(10), 12877–12884 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03695

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c03695 2020

  16. [16]

    Neukirch, Writhing instabilities of twisted rods: from infinite to finite length, J

    Neukirch, S.: Writhing instabilities of twisted rods: from infinite to finite length. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids50(6), 1175–1191 (2002) https: //doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5096(01)00130-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(01)00130-2 2002

  17. [17]

    International Jour- nal of Solids and Structures39(7), 1863–1883 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0020-7683(01)00234-7

    Heijden, G.H.M., Champneys, A.R., Thompson, J.M.T.: Spatially complex localisation in twisted elastic rods constrained to a cylinder. International Jour- nal of Solids and Structures39(7), 1863–1883 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0020-7683(01)00234-7

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical41(4), 045207 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/41/4/045207

    Sinden, D., Heijden, G.H.M.: Integrability of a conducting elastic rod in a mag- netic field. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical41(4), 045207 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/41/4/045207

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/4/045207 2008

  19. [19]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48(12), 125202 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/48/ 12/125202

    Sheka, D.D., Kravchuk, V.P., Gaididei, Y.: Curvature effects in statics and dynamics of low dimensional magnets. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48(12), 125202 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/48/ 12/125202

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/ 2015

  20. [20]

    Small18(12), 2105219 (2022)

    Sheka, D.D., Pylypovskyi, O.V., Volkov, O.M., Yershov, K.V., Kravchuk, V.P., Makarov, D.: Fundamentals of curvilinear ferromagnetism: statics and dynamics of geometrically curved wires and narrow ribbons. Small18(12), 2105219 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Journal of Physics 48 D: Applied Physics49(36), 363001 (2016)

    Streubel, R., Fischer, P., Kronast, F., Kravchuk, V.P., Sheka, D.D., Gaididei, Y., Schmidt, O.G., Makarov, D.: Magnetism in curved geometries. Journal of Physics 48 D: Applied Physics49(36), 363001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Physical Review B92(5) (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevb.92.054417

    Sheka, D.D., Kravchuk, V.P., Yershov, K.V., Gaididei, Y.: Torsion-induced effects in magnetic nanowires. Physical Review B92(5) (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevb.92.054417

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Journal of Applied Physics129(21) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054025

    Streubel, R., Tsymbal, E.Y., Fischer, P.: Magnetism in curved geometries. Journal of Applied Physics129(21) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054025

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0054025 2021

  24. [24]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50(38), 385401 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa8179

    Gaididei, Y., Goussev, A., Kravchuk, V.P., Pylypovskyi, O.V., Robbins, J.M., Sheka, D.D., Slastikov, V., Vasylkevych, S.: Magnetization in narrow ribbons: curvature effects. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50(38), 385401 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa8179

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa8179 2017

  25. [25]

    Nonlinear dynamics21, 71–99 (2000) https://doi

    Heijden, G., Thompson, J.: Helical and localised buckling in twisted rods: a unified analysis of the symmetric case. Nonlinear dynamics21, 71–99 (2000) https://doi. org/10.1023/a:1008310425967

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1008310425967 2000

  26. [26]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics58(6) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4989556

    Ameline, O., Haliyo, S., Huang, X., Cognet, J.A.H.: Classifications of ideal 3d elastica shapes at equilibrium. Journal of Mathematical Physics58(6) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4989556

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4989556 2017

  27. [27]

    Courier Corporation, Massachusetts (1944)

    Love, A.E.H.: A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. Courier Corporation, Massachusetts (1944)

    work page 1944

  28. [28]

    Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis101(4), 319–348 (1988) https://doi.org/10

    Mielke, A., Holmes, P.: Spatially complex equilibria of buckled rods. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis101(4), 319–348 (1988) https://doi.org/10. 1007/bf00251491

    work page 1988

  29. [29]

    OUP Oxford, Oxford (2010)

    Audoly, B., Pomeau, Y.: Elasticity and Geometry: From Hair Curls to the Non-linear Response of Shells. OUP Oxford, Oxford (2010). https://books.google.co.in/books?id=FMQRDAAAQBAJ

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    Communications in mathematical physics 201(1), 61–79 (1999)

    Choksi, R., Kohn, R.V., Otto, F.: Domain branching in uniaxial ferromagnets: a scaling law for the minimum energy. Communications in mathematical physics 201(1), 61–79 (1999)

    work page 1999

  31. [31]

    Dichmann, D.J., Li, Y., Maddocks, J.H.: Hamiltonian Formulations and Symme- tries in Rod Mechanics, pp. 71–113. Springer, New York (1996). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4612-4066-2 6 .http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4066-2 6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4066-2 1996

  32. [32]

    International Journal of Non-Linear Mechan- ics181, 105269 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2025.105269

    Neukirch, S., Bertails-Descoubes, F.: A noetherian approach to invariants for the statics and dynamics of elastic rods. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechan- ics181, 105269 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2025.105269

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2025.105269 2026

  33. [33]

    Pearson, London (2011)

    Goldstein, H.: Classical Mechanics. Pearson, London (2011). https://books.google.co.in/books?id=tVeFlb9tTxgC 49

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Heijden, G.H.M.: The static deformation of a twisted elastic rod constrained to lie on a cylinder. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences457(2007), 695–715 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2000.0688

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2000.0688 2007

  35. [35]

    Springer, London (2010)

    Pressley, A.: Elementary Differential Geometry. Springer, London (2010). https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-891-9 .https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-891-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-891-9 2010

  36. [36]

    IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics77(2), 220–235 (2011) https://doi.org/10

    Slastikov, V.V., Sonnenberg, C.: Reduced models for ferromagnetic nanowires. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics77(2), 220–235 (2011) https://doi.org/10. 1093/imamat/hxr019 50

    work page 2011