pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13932 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

A dynamical implementation of colour coherence for quenched jets in JEWEL

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords colour coherencejet quenchingJEWELheavy-ion collisionsangular orderingmedium resolution scalenuclear modification factorjet fragmentation function
0
0 comments X

The pith

A dynamical check whether medium scatterings resolve color dipoles implements colour coherence in JEWEL.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper implements colour coherence effects in the JEWEL event generator for jets evolving in dense media. In each hard parton-medium interaction, the code tests whether the momentum transfer is large enough to resolve the colour dipole formed by the parton and its colour partner. When resolution occurs, coherence is broken and angular ordering is lost for the next splitting. This mechanism suppresses hard radiation and thereby lowers the overall scattering rate, which in turn modifies the observable properties of reconstructed jets.

Core claim

In each interaction between a hard parton and the medium it is checked whether the momentum transfer of the scattering is sufficient to resolve the colour dipole. In this way it is dynamically decided which structures stay coherent. Importantly, scatterings that resolve an individual parton disrupt the colour coherence, which affects the next splitting via the loss of angular ordering. This leads to a suppression of hard radiation, and consequently a reduction in overall scattering rate, which is the dominant source of effects of colour coherence observable in reconstructed jets.

What carries the argument

Dynamical resolution check of colour dipoles via momentum transfer in each parton-medium scattering, which removes angular ordering for subsequent splittings.

If this is right

  • The nuclear modification factor for jets is reduced because fewer hard scatterings occur after coherence is broken.
  • Jet fragmentation functions become softer due to the suppression of hard radiation.
  • Jet-hadron correlations exhibit reduced yield at high associated hadron pT.
  • The overall effect on reconstructed jets is dominated by the lowered scattering rate rather than by direct medium-induced emissions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same resolution criterion could be used to decide coherence in vacuum parton showers outside JEWEL.
  • Comparing the resulting jet shapes to LHC data on heavy-ion collisions would test whether the medium resolution scale is the main driver of coherence loss.
  • Extending the check to multi-parton systems might reveal additional coherence patterns not captured by pairwise dipoles.

Load-bearing premise

That the momentum-transfer threshold correctly decides when a scattering resolves a colour dipole and thereby breaks coherence for the next splitting.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the hard-radiation component of jet-hadron correlations shows no suppression when colour coherence is expected to be active would falsify the dynamical criterion.

read the original abstract

Colour coherence affects the radiation pattern of hard partons both in vacuum and in a dense coloured background formed in heavy ion collisions. In vacuum evolution it leads to the well-known phenomenon of angular ordering, and in heavy ion collisions the appearance of a medium resolution scale strongly affects the way in which a fragmenting hard parton interacts with the background medium. In this paper I present the implementation of colour coherence in the JEWEL event generator for jet evolution in a dense medium. In each interaction between a hard parton and the medium it is checked whether the momentum transfer of the scattering is sufficient to resolve the colour dipole. In this way it is dynamically decided which structures stay coherent. Importantly, scatterings that resolve an individual parton disrupt the colour coherence, which affects the next splitting via the loss of angular ordering. This leads to a suppression of hard radiation, and consequently a reduction in overall scattering rate, which is the dominant source of effects of colour coherence observable in reconstructed jets. I discuss these modifications using the examples of nuclear modification factor, jet fragmentation function and jet-hadron correlations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper implements a dynamical criterion for colour coherence in the JEWEL Monte Carlo generator for jets in heavy-ion collisions. In each parton-medium scattering, the momentum transfer is checked against the colour dipole resolution scale; resolved scatterings are taken to break coherence, which removes angular ordering from the subsequent splitting. The resulting suppression of hard radiation is stated to reduce the overall medium scattering rate and thereby modify jet observables such as the nuclear modification factor, fragmentation functions, and jet-hadron correlations.

Significance. If the sign and magnitude of the effect are correctly reproduced, the work supplies a parameter-free, physically motivated extension of angular ordering to medium-modified showers. This addresses a long-standing gap in jet-quenching generators and could improve the description of coherence-sensitive observables without additional tuning.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / algorithm description] Abstract and the description of the algorithm: the central claim that removal of angular ordering suppresses hard radiation (and thereby the scattering rate) is load-bearing for all reported modifications to R_AA, fragmentation functions and jet-hadron correlations. Standard QCD shower logic predicts that loss of angular ordering enlarges the allowed emission phase space and increases (rather than suppresses) the yield of gluons, including harder ones. No compensating mechanism (modified formation times, medium-induced interference, or explicit phase-space calculation) is provided to reverse this sign; the manuscript must supply either an analytic derivation or a controlled numerical test demonstrating why the net effect is suppression.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive feedback. We value the recognition of the potential importance of a dynamical colour-coherence implementation in JEWEL. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract and the description of the algorithm: the central claim that removal of angular ordering suppresses hard radiation (and thereby the scattering rate) is load-bearing for all reported modifications to R_AA, fragmentation functions and jet-hadron correlations. Standard QCD shower logic predicts that loss of angular ordering enlarges the allowed emission phase space and increases (rather than suppresses) the yield of gluons, including harder ones. No compensating mechanism (modified formation times, medium-induced interference, or explicit phase-space calculation) is provided to reverse this sign; the manuscript must supply either an analytic derivation or a controlled numerical test demonstrating why the net effect is suppression.

    Authors: We agree that the referee has identified a point that requires explicit clarification. In vacuum QCD the loss of angular ordering indeed enlarges the emission phase space. In the present medium-modified implementation the coherence-breaking decision is made per scattering on the basis of the local resolution scale; this changes the colour flow for the subsequent vacuum-like splitting and, through the interplay with the medium scattering and induced radiation already present in JEWEL, produces a net suppression of hard emissions. The manuscript reports the resulting modifications to observables but does not isolate the sign-reversing mechanism. We will therefore add a dedicated numerical test (new figure and accompanying text) that compares the parton-level emission spectra and scattering rates with and without the dynamical coherence criterion, thereby demonstrating the suppression explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: implementation criterion is independent of target observables

full rationale

The paper implements a momentum-transfer resolution check for colour dipoles inside the existing JEWEL framework and states that resolved scatterings remove angular ordering from the subsequent splitting. No equations, fitted parameters, or results are shown to reduce by construction to the inputs or to prior self-citations; the central mechanism is a dynamical decision rule grounded in standard QCD dipole resolution and is applied to standard observables (R_AA, fragmentation functions) without tautological redefinition. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on established QCD colour coherence and the existing JEWEL framework; no new free parameters, ad-hoc entities, or unproven axioms are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard QCD colour coherence leading to angular ordering in vacuum
    Invoked as the baseline behaviour that is modified by medium scatterings.
  • domain assumption Existence of a medium resolution scale that can resolve colour dipoles
    Used to decide dynamically whether coherence is broken in each scattering.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5482 in / 1286 out tokens · 48753 ms · 2026-05-10T13:26:01.515647+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Andersson, G

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson and T. Sjostrand,How to Find the Gluon Jets in e+ e- Annihilation,Phys. Lett. B94(1980) 211

  2. [2]

    Azimov, Y.L

    Y.I. Azimov, Y.L. Dokshitzer, V.A. Khoze and S.I. Troian,The String Effect and QCD Coherence,Phys. Lett. B165(1985) 147

  3. [3]

    Dokshitzer, V.A

    Y.L. Dokshitzer, V.A. Khoze, S.I. Troian and A.H. Mueller,QCD Coherence in High-Energy Reactions,Rev. Mod. Phys.60(1988) 373. [4]JADEcollaboration,Experimental Study of Jets in electron - Positron Annihilation,Phys. Lett. B101(1981) 129. [5]CDFcollaboration,Evidence for color coherence inp¯pcollisions at √s= 1.8TeV,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 5562

  4. [4]

    Mueller,Multiplicity and Hadron Distributions in QCD Jets: Nonleading Terms,Nucl

    A.H. Mueller,Multiplicity and Hadron Distributions in QCD Jets: Nonleading Terms,Nucl. Phys. B213(1983) 85

  5. [5]

    Azimov, Y.L

    Y.I. Azimov, Y.L. Dokshitzer, V.A. Khoze and S.I. Troyan,Humpbacked QCD Plateau in Hadron Spectra,Z. Phys. C31(1986) 213

  6. [6]

    Bassetto, M

    A. Bassetto, M. Ciafaloni and G. Marchesini,Jet Structure and Infrared Sensitive Quantities in Perturbative QCD,Phys. Rept.100(1983) 201. [9]OPALcollaboration,A Study of coherence of soft gluons in hadron jets,Phys. Lett. B247 (1990) 617

  7. [7]

    Marchesini and B.R

    G. Marchesini and B.R. Webber,Simulation of QCD Jets Including Soft Gluon Interference, Nucl. Phys. B238(1984) 1

  8. [8]

    Interference effects in medium-induced gluon radiation

    J. Casalderrey-Solana and E. Iancu,Interference effects in medium-induced gluon radiation, JHEP08(2011) 015 [1105.1760]

  9. [9]

    Jets in QCD media: from color coherence to decoherence

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, C.A. Salgado and K. Tywoniuk,Jets in QCD Media: From Color Coherence to Decoherence,Phys. Lett. B707(2012) 156 [1102.4317]

  10. [10]

    Mehtar-Tani and K

    Y. Mehtar-Tani and K. Tywoniuk,Jet coherence in QCD media: the antenna radiation spectrum,JHEP01(2013) 031 [1105.1346]

  11. [11]

    Mehtar-Tani, C

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, C.A. Salgado and K. Tywoniuk,The radiation pattern of a QCD antenna in a dilute medium,JHEP04(2012) 064 [1112.5031]

  12. [12]

    The radiation pattern of a QCD antenna in a dense medium

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, C.A. Salgado and K. Tywoniuk,The Radiation pattern of a QCD antenna in a dense medium,JHEP10(2012) 197 [1205.5739]

  13. [13]

    Antiangular Ordering of Gluon Radiation in QCD Media

    Y. Mehtar-Tani, C.A. Salgado and K. Tywoniuk,Anti-angular ordering of gluon radiation in QCD media,1009.2965

  14. [14]

    New picture of jet quenching dictated by color coherence

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, Y. Mehtar-Tani, C.A. Salgado and K. Tywoniuk,New picture of jet quenching dictated by color coherence,Phys.Lett.B725(2013) 357 [1210.7765]

  15. [15]

    Armesto, H

    N. Armesto, H. Ma, M. Martinez, Y. Mehtar-Tani and C.A. Salgado,Interference between initial and final state radiation in a QCD medium,Phys. Lett. B717(2012) 280 [1207.0984]

  16. [16]

    Medium-induced gluon radiation and colour decoherence beyond the soft approximation

    L. Apolinário, N. Armesto, J.G. Milhano and C.A. Salgado,Medium-induced gluon radiation and colour decoherence beyond the soft approximation,JHEP02(2015) 119 [1407.0599]

  17. [17]

    Barata, F

    J.a. Barata, F. Domínguez, C.A. Salgado and V. Vila,A modified in-medium evolution equation with color coherence,JHEP05(2021) 148 [2101.12135]. – 42 –

  18. [18]

    Abreu, X

    S. Abreu, X. Mayo López, G. Milhano and A. Soto-Ontoso,A generalized picture of colour decoherence in dense QCD media,JHEP03(2025) 216 [2410.24135]

  19. [19]

    Kuzmin and J.M

    M.V. Kuzmin and J.M. Silva,QCD antenna radiative spectrum in dense media: accounting for full jet-medium interactions,2507.00143

  20. [20]

    Andres, L

    C. Andres, L. Apolinário, N. Armesto, A. Cordeiro, F. Dominguez, P. Guerrero-Rodríguez et al.,Gluon emission by aq¯qantenna with realistic parton-medium interactions, in31st International Conference on Ultra-relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions, 8, 2025 [2508.21719]

  21. [21]

    Kudinoor, D

    A.S. Kudinoor, D. Pablos and K. Rajagopal,Visualizing how the structure of large-radius jets shapes their wakes,JHEP01(2026) 020 [2501.18683]

  22. [22]

    Kudinoor, D

    A.S. Kudinoor, D. Pablos and K. Rajagopal,Constraining the Resolution Length of Quark-Gluon Plasma with New Jet Substructure Measurements,2509.08881

  23. [23]

    Casalderrey-Solana, D

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, D.C. Gulhan, J.G. Milhano, D. Pablos and K. Rajagopal,A Hybrid Strong/Weak Coupling Approach to Jet Quenching,JHEP10(2014) 019 [1405.3864]

  24. [24]

    Caucal, E

    P. Caucal, E. Iancu and G. Soyez,Deciphering thezg distribution in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,JHEP10(2019) 273 [1907.04866]

  25. [25]

    Lundberg and L

    T. Lundberg and L. Lönnblad,A spacetime model for the perturbative swing,Eur. Phys. J. C 85(2025) 1139 [2503.15413]

  26. [26]

    Hulcher, D

    Z. Hulcher, D. Pablos and K. Rajagopal,Resolution Effects in the Hybrid Strong/Weak Coupling Model,JHEP03(2018) 010 [1707.05245]

  27. [27]

    Casalderrey-Solana, G

    J. Casalderrey-Solana, G. Milhano, D. Pablos and K. Rajagopal,Modification of Jet Substructure in Heavy Ion Collisions as a Probe of the Resolution Length of Quark-Gluon Plasma,JHEP01(2020) 044 [1907.11248]

  28. [28]

    Caucal, E

    P. Caucal, E. Iancu, A.H. Mueller and G. Soyez,Vacuum-like jet fragmentation in a dense QCD medium,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 232001 [1801.09703]

  29. [29]

    K.C. Zapp, F. Krauss and U.A. Wiedemann,A perturbative framework for jet quenching, JHEP1303(2013) 080 [1212.1599]

  30. [30]

    Chudakov,?,Izv

    A.E. Chudakov,?,Izv. Akad. Naut. SSSR, Ser. Fiz.19(1955) 650

  31. [31]

    Bewick, S

    G. Bewick, S. Ferrario Ravasio, P. Richardson and M.H. Seymour,Logarithmic accuracy of angular-ordered parton showers,JHEP04(2020) 019 [1904.11866]

  32. [32]

    Lee, M.R

    J.-B. Lee, M.R. Masouminia, M.H. Seymour and U.-k. Yang,Generalized angular-order parton showers in Herwig 7,JHEP08(2024) 064 [2312.13125]

  33. [33]

    Gustafson,Dual Description of a Confined Color Field,Phys

    G. Gustafson,Dual Description of a Confined Color Field,Phys. Lett. B175(1986) 453. [37]ALEPHcollaboration,Studies of quantum chromodynamics with the ALEPH detector,Phys. Rept.294(1998) 1. [38]OPALcollaboration,Measurements of flavor dependent fragmentation functions in Z0 –>q anti-q events,Eur. Phys. J. C7(1999) 369 [hep-ex/9807004]. [39]DELPHIcollaborat...

  34. [34]

    Dulat, T.-J

    S. Dulat, T.-J. Hou, J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky et al.,New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 033006 [1506.07443]

  35. [35]

    EPPS16: Nuclear parton distributions with LHC data

    K.J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen and C.A. Salgado,EPPS16: Nuclear parton distributions with LHC data,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 163 [1612.05741]

  36. [36]

    LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era

    A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordström, B. Page, M. Rüfenacht et al.,LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 132 [1412.7420]

  37. [37]

    Bierlich et al.,Robust Independent Validation of Experiment and Theory: Rivet version 3, SciPost Phys.8(2020) 026, [1912.05451]

    C. Bierlich et al.,Robust Independent Validation of Experiment and Theory: Rivet version 3, SciPost Phys.8(2020) 026 [1912.05451]

  38. [38]

    HepMC3: A new version of the HepMC event record,

    A. Buckley, P. Ilten, D. Konstantinov, L. Lönnblad, J. Monk, W. Pokorski et al.,The HepMC3 event record library for Monte Carlo event generators,Comput. Phys. Commun. 260(2021) 107310 [1912.08005]

  39. [39]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet User Manual,Eur.Phys.J.C72(2012) 1896 [1111.6097]

  40. [40]

    Milhano and K

    J.G. Milhano and K. Zapp,Improved background subtraction and a fresh look at jet sub-structure in JEWEL,2207.14814. [48]ATLAScollaboration,Measurement of jet fragmentation in Pb+Pb andppcollisions at√sN N = 5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Rev. C98(2018) 024908 [1805.05424]. [49]CMScollaboration,In-medium modification of dijets in PbPb collisions at ...

  41. [41]

    Pablos and S

    D. Pablos and S. Sanjurjo,Color coherence effects in dipole-quark scattering in the soft limit, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) L111502 [2406.08550]

  42. [42]

    Roux, J.G

    C.L. Roux, J.G. Milhano and K. Zapp,How many interactions does it take to modify a jet?, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1065 [2412.14983]

  43. [43]

    Buckley, H

    A. Buckley, H. Hoeth, H. Lacker, H. Schulz and J.E. von Seggern,Systematic event generator tuning for the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C65(2010) 331 [0907.2973]. – 44 –