pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14992 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.app-ph· physics.comp-ph· quant-ph

Toroidal Plasmonic Nanodimers for Enhanced Near-Infrared Emission in Heterostructured InP Quantum Dots

Arda Gulucu , Emre Ozan Polat This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-phphysics.comp-phquant-ph
keywords toroidal plasmonic nanodimersInP quantum dotsnear-infrared emissionPurcell enhancementFDTD simulationsplasmonic antennasheterostructured QDsnanophotonics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Silver toroidal plasmonic nanodimer antennas enhance near-infrared emission from heterostructured InP quantum dots by aligning resonances to achieve large Purcell factors while preserving high quantum efficiency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses finite-difference time-domain simulations to explore how silver antennas shaped as toroidal dimers can increase the brightness of cadmium-free InP quantum dots in the near-infrared. Heterostructured InP QDs have partial charge separation that slows their natural emission, but the antennas create intense hotspots whose resonance can be adjusted by changing the toroid shape to match the dots' emission wavelengths between 675 and 845 nm. The alignment produces faster radiative decay without losing efficiency to non-radiative paths. Small changes in how close the dot sits to the antenna gap also alter the outcome, showing the design is sensitive to placement.

Core claim

The coupled toroidal geometry supports strongly confined bonding modes that generate intense nanogap hotspots, while its resonance can be systematically tuned through the toroid aspect ratio. By spectrally aligning the antenna response with QD emission bands (675-845 nm), large Purcell enhancements are achieved together with high quantum efficiencies, demonstrating efficient conversion of enhanced decay rates into radiative emission. Nanometer-scale variations in emitter-antenna separation strongly modulate the radiative rates and spectral response.

What carries the argument

Silver toroidal plasmonic nanodimer antennas whose bonding plasmonic modes create tunable nanogap hotspots for Purcell enhancement.

If this is right

  • Spectral alignment between the toroidal antenna resonance and the 675-845 nm QD bands produces large Purcell enhancements.
  • High quantum efficiencies are retained even as decay rates increase.
  • Nanometer changes in emitter-antenna separation produce strong modulation of radiative rates and spectral response.
  • The toroidal geometry offers a tunable platform for controlling emission in NIR quantum emitters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Real devices based on this design will require fabrication methods that hold emitter-antenna separations to within a few nanometers.
  • The same resonance-alignment principle could be tested on other quantum-dot materials that suffer from reduced wavefunction overlap.
  • Topology-tuned antennas may offer advantages for hotspot intensity over simpler rod or sphere dimers when applied to NIR emitters.

Load-bearing premise

The finite-difference time-domain simulations accurately represent real heterostructured InP QDs and plasmonic structures, including all material losses, fabrication variations, and actual emitter-antenna coupling without experimental validation.

What would settle it

Fabricating the toroidal nanodimer antennas, embedding heterostructured InP QDs at controlled separations, and measuring their emission lifetimes and intensities would directly test whether the simulated Purcell enhancements and quantum efficiencies appear in experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14992 by Arda Gulucu, Emre Ozan Polat.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Normalized photoluminescence spectra of heterostructured QDs with distinct emission maxima (a) Schematic representation of ZnSe/InP/ZnS core-shell-shell quantum dots functionalized with surface ligands. (b) Normalized PL spectra of four QD batches, modeled as point dipole emitters, representing tunable emission peaks centered at approximately 675, 740, 770, and 845 nm. We next characterize the bare TPNDs u… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Toroidal plasmonic nanodimer geometry and aspect-ratio-dependent optical response. (a) Schematic of a plasmonic dimer composed of two identical Ag TNA separated by a gap of 𝑑 = 14 nm. The geometry is defined by the major radius 𝑅 and minor radius 𝑟, with a fixed total size 𝑟 + 𝑅 = 60 nm; the aspect ratio 𝑟/𝑅 parametrizes the structure. (b) Simulated electric-field intensity enhancement ∣ 𝐸/𝐸0 ∣ 2 for 𝑟/𝑅 =… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Toroidal plasmonic nanodimer coupled to a quantum dot emitter. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectral and distance-dependent radiative and nonradiative decay dynamics of the QD-TPND coupled system. (a) Normalized radiative (𝛾𝑟/𝛾0 ) and nonradiative (𝛾𝑛𝑟/𝛾0 ) decay rates for QD845, evaluated at 𝑑dip = 3 nm and 𝑟/𝑅 = 0.24. (b) Purcell factor (𝛾/𝛾0 ) and quantum efficiency 𝜙 = 𝛾𝑟/(𝛾𝑟 + 𝛾𝑛𝑟), evaluated at the emission peaks of the four QD batches for a centered emitter configuration. The TPNDs are geo… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Near-infrared (NIR) emitters operating in the 650-900 nm range are highly attractive for imaging and sensing in turbid media; however, cadmium-free InP-based quantum dots (QDs) often suffer from limited brightness due to nonradiative pathways and inefficient photon outcoupling. In particular, heterostructured InP QDs can exhibit band alignments that induce partial spatial separation of charge carriers, leading to reduced electron-hole wavefunction overlap. This modifies intrinsic recombination dynamics and enhances the sensitivity of their emission to the surrounding photonic environment. Here, we investigate silver toroidal plasmonic nanoantenna dimers (Ag TPNDs) through finite-difference-time-domain (FDTD) simulations as a geometry-tunable platform for enhancing NIR emission of heterostructured InP-based QDs. The coupled toroidal geometry supports strongly confined bonding modes that generate intense nanogap hotspots, while its resonance can be systematically tuned through the toroid aspect ratio. By spectrally aligning the antenna response with QD emission bands (675-845 nm), we achieve large Purcell enhancements together with high quantum efficiencies, demonstrating efficient conversion of enhanced decay rates into radiative emission. We further show that nanometer-scale variations in emitter-antenna separation strongly modulate the radiative rates and spectral response. These results establish toroidal plasmonic nanodimers as a topology-driven platform for controlling emission in NIR quantum emitters and for advancing NIR nanophotonic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses FDTD simulations to study silver toroidal plasmonic nanodimer (TPND) antennas as a tunable platform for enhancing near-infrared emission from heterostructured InP quantum dots. By adjusting the toroid aspect ratio to align the bonding-mode resonance with QD emission bands (675-845 nm), the authors report large Purcell enhancements accompanied by high quantum efficiencies, demonstrating efficient conversion of increased decay rates into radiative output, with additional sensitivity to nanometer-scale emitter-antenna separation.

Significance. If the simulated results hold under realistic conditions, the work identifies a geometry-tunable topology for controlling NIR QD emission dynamics, potentially improving brightness for imaging and sensing applications in turbid media. The emphasis on spectral alignment and separation sensitivity offers a clear design principle, though the purely computational approach means impact hinges on future experimental realization and material fidelity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation Methodology and Results] The central claim that spectral alignment yields large Purcell enhancements while preserving high quantum efficiencies rests on modeling the heterostructured InP QDs as classical point dipoles whose intrinsic radiative and non-radiative rates are supplied as inputs. This approach does not self-consistently derive the reduced electron-hole overlap or surface-related quenching from the band alignment, which directly affects whether enhanced decay rates convert efficiently to radiative emission in the presence of silver losses (see Simulation Methodology and Results sections).
  2. [Abstract and Results] The abstract and main claims assert 'large Purcell enhancements' and 'high quantum efficiencies' upon alignment of the toroidal bonding mode, yet no specific numerical values, error bars, baseline comparisons to unenhanced QDs or other antenna geometries, or sensitivity analysis to material dispersion and fabrication detuning are provided. This omission is load-bearing for assessing the magnitude and robustness of the reported effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains no quantitative data on enhancement factors, quantum efficiencies, or specific resonance wavelengths achieved, which would help readers immediately gauge the scale of the improvements.
  2. [Methods] Clarify the exact material dispersion models (e.g., for Ag and InP) and any assumptions regarding surface roughness or emitter orientation in the FDTD setup to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We have revised the text to provide specific quantitative values, baseline comparisons, and sensitivity analyses as requested. We have also added clarifications on the classical dipole modeling approach and its relation to the heterostructured QD properties. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation Methodology and Results] The central claim that spectral alignment yields large Purcell enhancements while preserving high quantum efficiencies rests on modeling the heterostructured InP QDs as classical point dipoles whose intrinsic radiative and non-radiative rates are supplied as inputs. This approach does not self-consistently derive the reduced electron-hole overlap or surface-related quenching from the band alignment, which directly affects whether enhanced decay rates convert efficiently to radiative emission in the presence of silver losses (see Simulation Methodology and Results sections).

    Authors: We acknowledge that the model uses classical point dipoles with input intrinsic rates rather than a fully self-consistent quantum treatment of band alignment and surface effects. This is the standard methodology in FDTD studies of plasmonic Purcell enhancement, enabling systematic geometry sweeps that would be intractable with ab initio methods. The supplied rates are taken from experimental literature on heterostructured InP QDs, which already embed the reduced electron-hole overlap arising from type-II alignment and typical surface quenching. We have added an explicit paragraph in the revised Simulation Methodology section justifying this approximation, citing comparable prior works, and noting that the reported quantum efficiencies reflect the competition between enhanced radiative rates and the fixed non-radiative losses plus silver absorption. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract and Results] The abstract and main claims assert 'large Purcell enhancements' and 'high quantum efficiencies' upon alignment of the toroidal bonding mode, yet no specific numerical values, error bars, baseline comparisons to unenhanced QDs or other antenna geometries, or sensitivity analysis to material dispersion and fabrication detuning are provided. This omission is load-bearing for assessing the magnitude and robustness of the reported effects.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical values and comparisons are needed to substantiate the claims. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract with representative values (Purcell factors reaching ~40–60 with quantum efficiencies remaining >65 % for spectrally aligned cases) and inserted a new table in the Results section that reports peak enhancements, modified quantum efficiencies, and direct comparisons to bare QDs and spherical dimer antennas. We have also added error estimates from grid convergence tests, a sensitivity study to ±5 % variations in silver permittivity, and a brief analysis of resonance detuning due to fabrication tolerances. These additions are drawn from the existing simulation data set. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results follow directly from FDTD simulation outputs on independent geometric and material inputs

full rationale

The paper's central results (Purcell factors, radiative rates, and quantum efficiencies) are obtained as numerical outputs from FDTD simulations of toroidal dimer geometries, with resonance tuning performed by explicit variation of the toroid aspect ratio and emitter-antenna separation. No parameter is fitted to the target emission enhancement and then re-labeled as a prediction; the classical dipole source properties and silver dispersion are taken as fixed external inputs rather than being redefined in terms of the computed enhancement. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes from prior author work are invoked to close the derivation. The reported spectral alignment and separation sensitivity are therefore direct consequences of the electromagnetic solver applied to the stated physical model, rendering the chain self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on simulation assumptions about electromagnetic modeling and geometric tuning parameters chosen to match emission bands.

free parameters (2)
  • toroid aspect ratio
    Adjusted to spectrally align antenna resonance with QD emission bands (675-845 nm).
  • emitter-antenna separation
    Nanometer-scale variations shown to modulate radiative rates, implying it is a tuned or varied parameter.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption FDTD method accurately captures plasmonic resonances, nanogap hotspots, and Purcell effects in silver toroidal dimers coupled to QDs
    All results are obtained via FDTD simulations without mentioned experimental cross-checks.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5572 in / 1262 out tokens · 28082 ms · 2026-05-10T10:18:59.416054+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    G. Hong, A. L. Antaris, and H. Dai, Near -infrared fluorophores for biomedical imaging, Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1 (2017) 0010

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Weissleder, A clearer vision for in vivo imaging, Nat

    R. Weissleder, A clearer vision for in vivo imaging, Nat. Biotechnol. 19 (2001) 316

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Rauch, M

    T. Rauch, M. Böberl, S. F. Tedde, J. Fürst, M. V . Kovalenko, G. Hesser, U. Lemmer, W. Heiss, and O. Hayden, Near-infrared imaging with quantum-dot-sensitized organic photodiodes, Nat. Photonics 3 (2009) 332

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Almeida, R

    G. Almeida, R. F. Ubbink, M. Stam, I. du Fossé, and A. J. Houtepen, InP colloidal quantum dots for visible and near-infrared photonics, Nat, Rev. Mater 8 (2023) 742

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Kinkhabwala, Z

    A. Kinkhabwala, Z. Yu, S. Fan, Y . Avlasevich, K. Müllen, and W. E. Moerner, Large single - molecule fluorescence enhancements produced by a bowtie nanoantenna, Nat. Photonics 3 (2009) 654

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Bruchez, M

    M. Bruchez, M. Moronne, P. Gin, S. Weiss, and A. P. Alivisatos, Semiconductor Nanocrystals as Fluorescent Biological Labels, Science 281 (1998) 2013

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    F. P. García de Arquer, D. V . Talapin, V . I. Klimov, Y . Arakawa, M. Bayer, and E. H. Sargent, Semiconductor quantum dots: Technological progress and future challenges, Science 373 (2021) eaaz8541

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    H. M. Gil, T. W. Price, K. Chelani, J. S. G. Bouillard, S. D. J. Calaminus, and G. J. Stasiuk, NIR-quantum dots in biomedical imaging and their future, iScience 24 (2021) 102189

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    H. B. Jalali, S. Sadeghi, I. B. Dogru Yuksel, A. Onal, and S. Nizamoglu, Past, present and future of indium phosphide quantum dots, Nano Res. 15 (2022) 4468

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Kumar, C

    S. Kumar, C. Cocchi, and T. Steenbock, Surface Defects and Symmetry Breaking Impact on the Photoluminescence of InP Quantum Dots, Nano Lett. 25 (2025) 10588. 14

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    A. M. Saeboe, A. Y . Nikiforov, R. Toufanian, J. C. Kays, M. Chern, J. P. Casas, K. Han, A. Piryatinski, D. Jones, and A. M. Dennis, Extending the Near -Infrared Emission Range of Indium Phosphide Quantum Dots for Multiplexed In Vivo Imaging, Nano Lett. 21 (2021) 3271

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Y . H. Won, O. Cho, T. Kim, D. Y . Chung, T. Kim, H. Chung, H. Jang, J. Lee, D. Kim, and E. Jang, Highly efficient and stable InP/ZnSe/ZnS quantum dot light-emitting diodes, Nature 575 (2019) 634

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Lee et al., All-Inorganic InP/ZnSe/ZnS Quantum Dots with Chalcogenidometallate Ligands for Biosolar Catalysis, Adv

    J. Lee et al., All-Inorganic InP/ZnSe/ZnS Quantum Dots with Chalcogenidometallate Ligands for Biosolar Catalysis, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35 (2025) e11671

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    S. Shin, Y . Lee, J. Kim, J. Na, N. Gwak, S. Kim, J. Seo, C. S. Yoon, and N. Oh, Tailoring the Interfacial Composition of Heterostructure InP Quantum Dots for Efficient Electroluminescent Devices, Small Methods 9 (2025) 2401560

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    L. P. Balet, S. A. Ivanov, A. Piryatinski, M. Achermann, and V . I. Klimov, Inverted Core/Shell Nanocrystals Continuously Tunable between Type-I and Type-II Localization Regimes, Nano Lett. 4 (2004) 1485

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    V . I. Klimov, A. A. Mikhailovsky, S. Xu, A. Malko, J. A. Hollingsworth, C. A. Leatherdale, H. J. Eisler, and M. G. Bawendi, Optical gain and stimulated emission in nanocrystal quantum dots, Science 290 (2000) 314

    work page 2000

  17. [17]

    S. Kim, J. Park, T. Kim, E. Jang, S. Jun, H. Jang, B. Kim, and S. W. Kim, Reverse Type -I ZnSe/InP/ZnS Core/Shell/Shell nanocrystals: Cadmium -free quantum dots for visible luminescence, Small 7 (2011) 70

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Y . J. Lu, R. Sokhoyan, W. H. Cheng, G. Kafaie Shirmanesh, A. R. Davoyan, R. A. Pala, K. Thyagarajan, and H. A. Atwater, Dynamically controlled Purcell enhancement of visible spontaneous emission in a gated plasmonic heterostructure, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1631

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Pelton, Modified spontaneous emission in nanophotonic structures, Nat

    M. Pelton, Modified spontaneous emission in nanophotonic structures, Nat. Photonics 9 (2015) 427

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies

    H. E. M. Purcell, "Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies." Confined electrons and photons: new physics and applications. Boston, MA: Springer US, (1995) 839-839

    work page 1995

  21. [21]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Gupta, J

    V . Gupta, J. L. Montaño-Priede, S. Hu, E. S. A. Goerlitzer, M. Zapata-Herrera, R. Esteban, N. Zabala, J. J. Baumberg, J. Aizpurua, and N. V ogel, Emission enhancement of colloidal quantum dots confined in double disc nano-antennas with controlled opening, Nanoscale 18 (2026) 1576

    work page 2026

  23. [23]

    Barreda, L

    A. Barreda, L. Mercadé, M. Zapata -Herrera, J. Aizpurua, and A. Martínez, Hybrid Photonic - Plasmonic Cavity Design for Very Large Purcell Factors at Telecommunication Wavelengths, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18 (2022) 044066

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Anger, P

    P. Anger, P. Bharadwaj, and L. Novotny, Enhancement and Quenching of Single -Molecule Fluorescence Near Metallic Nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 113002

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    S. Kühn, U. Håkanson, L. Rogobete, and V . Sandoghdar, Enhancement of single -molecule fluorescence using a gold nanoparticle as an optical nanoantenna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 017402

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Novotny, P

    L. Novotny, P. Bharadwaj, and B. Deutsch, Optical Antennas, Advances in Optics and Photonics, 1.3 (2009) 438-483. 15

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Biagioni, J

    P. Biagioni, J. S. Huang, and B. Hecht, Nanoantennas for visible and infrared radiation, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75 (2012) 024402

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    J. A. Schuller, E. S. Barnard, W. Cai, Y . C. Jun, J. S. White, and M. L. Brongersma, Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation, Nat. Mater. 9 (2010) 193

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    Gulucu and E

    A. Gulucu and E. O. Polat, Optically Switchable Fluorescence Enhancement at Critical Interparticle Distances, Adv. Theory Simul. 8 (2010) e01134

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    J. L. Montaño-Priede, M. Zapata-Herrera, R. Esteban, N. Zabala, and J. Aizpurua, An overview on plasmon-enhanced photoluminescence via metallic nanoantennas, Nanophotonics 13 (2024) 4771

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Dulkeith, A

    E. Dulkeith, A. C. Morteani, T. Niedereichholz, T. A. Klar, J. Feldmann, S. A. Levi, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, D. N. Reinhoudt, M. Möller, and D. I. Gittins, Fluorescence Quenching of Dye Molecules near Gold Nanoparticles: Radiative and Nonradiative Effects , Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 203002

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    J. J. Baumberg, J. Aizpurua, M. H. Mikkelsen, and D. R. Smith, Extreme nanophotonics from ultrathin metallic gaps, Nat. Mater. 18 (2019) 668

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    T. B. Hoang, G. M. Akselrod, and M. H. Mikkelsen, Ultrafast Room-Temperature Single Photon Emission from Quantum Dots Coupled to Plasmonic Nanocavities, Nano Lett. 16 (2015) 270

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    G. M. Akselrod, C. Argyropoulos, T. B. Hoang, C. Ciracì, C. Fang, J. Huang, D. R. Smith, and M. H. Mikkelsen, Probing the mechanisms of large Purcell enhancement in plasmonic nanoantennas, Nat. Photonics 8 (2014) 835

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Nordlander, C

    P. Nordlander, C. Oubre, E. Prodan, K. Li, and M. I. Stockman, Plasmon Hybridization in Nanoparticle Dimers, Nano Lett. 4 (2004) 899

    work page 2004

  36. [36]

    N. J. Halas, S. Lal, W. S. Chang, S. Link, and P. Nordlander, Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 3913

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Prodan, C

    E. Prodan, C. Radloff, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander, A Hybridization Model for the Plasmon Response of Complex Nanostructures, Science 302 (2003) 419

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    S. A. Maier and others, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, Springer 1 (2007)

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    Rechberger, A

    W. Rechberger, A. Hohenau , A. Leitner, J. R. Krenn, B. Lamprecht, and F. R. Aussenegg, Optical properties of two interacting gold nanoparticles, Opt. Commun. 220 (2003) 137

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    Giannini, A

    V . Giannini, A. I. Fernández -Domínguez, S. C. Heck, and S. A. Maier, Plasmonic Nanoantennas: Fundamentals and Their Use in Controlling the Radiative Properties of Nanoemitters, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 3888

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    C. M. Dutta, T. A. Ali, D. W. Brandl, T. H. Park, and P. Nordlander, Plasmonic properties of a metallic torus, J. Chem. Phys. 129 (2008)

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    A. Mary, D. M. Koller, A. Hohenau, J. R. Krenn, A. Bouhelier, and A. Dereux, Optical absorption of torus -shaped metal nanoparticles in the visible range, Phys. Rev. B 76 (2007) 245422

    work page 2007

  43. [43]

    Gulucu and E

    A. Gulucu and E. O. Polat, Programmable Switching of Molecular Transitions via Plasmonic Toroidal Nanoantennae, arXiV preprint (2025) 2512.01303. 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Papasimakis, V

    N. Papasimakis, V . A. Fedotov, V . Savinov, T. A. Raybould, and N. I. Zheludev, Electromagnetic toroidal excitations in matter and free space, Nat. Mater. 15 (2016) 263

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Kaelberer, V

    T. Kaelberer, V . A. Fedotov, N. Papasimakis, D. P. Tsai, and N. I. Zheludev, Toroidal dipolar response in a metamaterial, Science 330 (2010) 1510

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    M. O. El -Shenawee, Polarization dependence of plasmonic nanotoroid dimer antenna, IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 9 (2010) 463

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    Novotny and N

    L. Novotny and N. Van Hulst, Antennas for light, Nat. Photonics 5 (2011) 83

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 (2015) 347

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    X. Dang, N. M. Bardhan, J. Qi, L. Gu, N. A. Eze, C. W. Lin, S. Kataria, P. T. Hammond, and A. M. Belcher, Deep-tissue optical imaging of near cellular-sized features, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 3873

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, Photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photonics 3 (2009) 687

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, Optical Constants of the Noble Metals, Phys. Rev. B 6 (1972) 4370. i Supplementary Information for Toroidal Plasmonic Nanodimers for Enhanced Near-Infrared Emission in ZnS/InP/ZnSe Quantum Dots Arda Gulucu1,2 and Emre Ozan Polat1,2,* 1Department of Physics, Bilkent University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey 2UNAM - National Nanotec...

    work page 1972