pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15924 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.mtrl-sci· quant-ph

Ultrafast Current Switching from Quantum Geometry in Semimetals

Youngjae Kim , Sejoong Kim , Jun-Won Rhim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph
keywords quantum geometryultrafast switchingsemimetalsquadratic band touchingflat bandsinterband couplingHilbert-Schmidt distanceconductivity classification
0
0 comments X

The pith

In semimetals with non-trivial quantum geometry, an electric current reaches steady state immediately upon application of a moderate external field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that certain semimetals, specifically quadratic band-touching semimetals and singular flat bands, generate current instantaneously when a moderate electric field is applied. This instant response arises because interband coupling, set by the Hilbert-Schmidt quantum distance, acts together with a finite density of states at the band-touching point. As a result, the current can be switched on and off rapidly and stably under periodic optical pulses, and the mechanism yields a universal classification of conductivity for both gapless and gapped cases. The authors argue this behavior outperforms conventional metals, semiconductors, and graphene in switching speed while remaining feasible under realistic conditions.

Core claim

In quantum geometric semimetals including quadratic band-touching semimetals and singular flat bands, an electric current is generated instantaneously upon application of a moderate external electric field and reaches its steady-state value at once. The microscopic origin is interband coupling governed by the Hilbert-Schmidt quantum distance together with a finite density of states at the band-touching point. This produces rapid and stable on-off switching under periodic optical pulse trains and supplies a universal classification of conductivity for both gapless and gapped quantum geometric semimetals.

What carries the argument

Interband coupling governed by the Hilbert-Schmidt quantum distance, acting together with a finite density of states at the band-touching point.

If this is right

  • The current exhibits rapid and stable on-off switching under periodic optical pulse trains that remain robust under experimentally feasible conditions.
  • Switching speed exceeds that of conventional metals, semiconductors, and graphene.
  • The same mechanism supplies a universal classification of conductivity for both gapless and gapped quantum geometric semimetals.
  • First-principles calculations identify concrete platforms such as bilayer graphene, cyclic graphene, monolayer bismuth, and V3F8 where the instantaneous switching can be realized.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Device architectures could exploit optical pulse trains to achieve lower energy switching by avoiding the need for strong fields or complex gating.
  • The classification of conductivity may extend to other response functions, such as optical conductivity or nonlinear transport, in the same class of materials.
  • If the instantaneous response survives at room temperature, these semimetals could serve as testbeds for studying geometry-dominated transport without cryogenic cooling.

Load-bearing premise

Interband coupling via the Hilbert-Schmidt quantum distance plus finite density of states at the touching point dominates the instantaneous current response and is not disrupted by scattering, disorder, or conventional transport processes.

What would settle it

Time-resolved current measurements on bilayer graphene or monolayer bismuth showing that the current does not reach steady state within the first few femtoseconds after a moderate field is applied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15924 by Jun-Won Rhim, Sejoong Kim, Youngjae Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Technological progress towards next-generation electronics critically relies on achieving faster switching with reduced energy consumption. Because device operation speeds are fundamentally constrained by the intrinsic properties of constituent materials, identifying systems with inherently superior switching capabilities is essential. Here, we propose that semimetallic systems characterized by non-trivial quantum geometry, including quadratic band-touching semimetals and singular flat bands, can serve as a promising platform for ultrafast switching at voltages compatible with modern electronics. We show that, in such quantum geometric semimetals, an electric current is generated instantaneously upon application of a moderate external electric field, reaching its steady-state value. As a consequence, the current exhibits rapid and stable on-off switching behaviour under periodic optical pulse trains, demonstrating robustness under experimentally feasible conditions. In terms of switching speed, this quantum geometric semimetal outperforms conventional metals, semiconductors, and graphene. We identify the microscopic origin of this behaviour as interband coupling governed by the Hilbert-Schmidt quantum distance, together with a finite density of states at the band-touching point. This mechanism further leads to a universal classification of conductivity for both gapless and gapped quantum geometric semimetals. Finally, first-principles calculations suggest realistic material platforms, including bilayer graphene, cyclic graphene, monolayer bismuth and V3F8-in which the predicted instantaneous current switching can be directly realized, further supported by time-dependent density functional theory simulations performed for representative systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that semimetals with non-trivial quantum geometry (quadratic band-touching semimetals and singular flat bands) generate electric current instantaneously upon application of a moderate electric field, reaching steady-state value immediately due to interband coupling set by the Hilbert-Schmidt quantum distance together with finite DOS at the touching point. This enables rapid, stable on-off switching under periodic optical pulse trains that outperforms conventional metals, semiconductors, and graphene. The work provides a universal classification of conductivity for gapless and gapped cases, identifies candidate materials (bilayer graphene, cyclic graphene, monolayer bismuth, V3F8), and supports the predictions with first-principles calculations and TDDFT simulations.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result identifies a new class of materials for ultrafast, low-energy switching relevant to next-generation electronics. The combination of an analytic mechanism based on established quantum-geometric quantities, a universal conductivity classification, and concrete material proposals backed by first-principles and TDDFT calculations constitutes a substantive contribution to the field of quantum geometry in transport.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical model and TDDFT section] The instantaneous reaching of steady-state current is derived under the collisionless (Γ→0) limit of the time-dependent density-matrix or Boltzmann evolution. The manuscript does not demonstrate that finite scattering rates (electron-phonon or impurity) leave the rise time zero on experimentally relevant timescales; this assumption is load-bearing for the ultrafast-switching claim.
  2. [TDDFT simulations] The TDDFT simulations for representative systems (e.g., bilayer graphene) are presented as confirming instantaneous switching, yet no information is given on the time step, dephasing terms, or how the pulse-train periodicity compares to realistic relaxation times; without these, it is unclear whether the reported on-off behavior survives when scattering is restored.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction refer to 'Hilbert-Schmidt quantum distance' without an explicit equation or reference to its definition in the main text; adding the defining expression early would improve readability.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the pulse-train switching plots should state the pulse duration, field strength, and material parameters used so that the robustness claim can be directly assessed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and will incorporate the suggested revisions to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical model and TDDFT section] The instantaneous reaching of steady-state current is derived under the collisionless (Γ→0) limit of the time-dependent density-matrix or Boltzmann evolution. The manuscript does not demonstrate that finite scattering rates (electron-phonon or impurity) leave the rise time zero on experimentally relevant timescales; this assumption is load-bearing for the ultrafast-switching claim.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this important point. The analytic derivation and the universal classification are indeed obtained in the collisionless limit. The physical mechanism relies on the quantum geometric interband coupling, which allows the current to build up on ultrafast timescales determined by the electric field strength and the density of states, independent of scattering in the ideal case. To address the concern, in the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection discussing the effect of finite scattering rates. We will show that when the scattering rate Γ is much smaller than the inverse of the characteristic time set by the field (e.g., eE v_F / ħ or similar scales), the rise time remains negligible compared to the pulse durations considered. We will support this with estimates for the proposed materials using typical experimental scattering times. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [TDDFT simulations] The TDDFT simulations for representative systems (e.g., bilayer graphene) are presented as confirming instantaneous switching, yet no information is given on the time step, dephasing terms, or how the pulse-train periodicity compares to realistic relaxation times; without these, it is unclear whether the reported on-off behavior survives when scattering is restored.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The TDDFT simulations were performed to illustrate the predicted behavior in realistic band structures. In the revised manuscript, we will provide detailed information on the computational parameters, including the time step used in the propagation, any dephasing or broadening terms included, and a direct comparison between the optical pulse-train periodicity and estimated relaxation times from electron-phonon coupling or impurity scattering in these systems. This will demonstrate the robustness of the on-off switching under conditions closer to experiment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation from quantum geometry is independent of the target claim.

full rationale

The paper derives instantaneous current generation from interband coupling via the Hilbert-Schmidt quantum distance combined with finite DOS at band-touching points. This follows from standard quantum geometric quantities and time-dependent perturbation theory in the collisionless limit, which is an explicit modeling choice for ultrafast regimes rather than a definitional reduction. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are evident. First-principles calculations and TDDFT simulations supply external validation outside the analytic framework. The switching behavior is presented as a consequence of these inputs, not equivalent to them by construction. This is the most common honest outcome for papers grounded in established quantum mechanics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard condensed-matter assumptions about band structure and quantum geometry; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and single-particle band theory apply, with interband transitions governed by quantum geometric quantities.
    The mechanism invokes Hilbert-Schmidt quantum distance and density of states at band-touching points as established concepts in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1403 out tokens · 47279 ms · 2026-05-10T08:07:11.345825+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Clarence, A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics, Proc

    Z. Clarence, A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A145, 523 (1934)

    work page 1934

  2. [2]

    D. S. Chemla, D. A. B. Miller, and S. Schmitt-Rink, Generation of ultrashort electrical pulses through screening by virtual populations in biased quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1018 (1987)

    work page 1987

  3. [3]

    J. J. Liou, F. Schwierz, and H. Wong,Nanometer CMOS(Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd., 2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    X. Mei, W. Yoshida, M. Lange, J. Lee, J. Zhou, P.-H. Liu, K. Leong, A. Zamora, J. Padilla, S. Sarkozy, R. Lai, and W. R. Deal, First demonstration of amplification at 1 thz using 25-nm inp high electron mobility transistor process, IEEE Electron Device Letters36, 327 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    O. D. M ¨ucke, Pick up speed, Nature Physics12, 724 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Heide, P

    C. Heide, P. D. Keathley, and M. F. Kling, Petahertz electronics, Nature Reviews Physics 10.1038/s42254-024- 00764-7 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-024- 2024

  7. [7]

    Yoshioka, G

    K. Yoshioka, G. Bernard, T. Wakamura, M. Hashisaka, K. Sasaki, S. Sasaki, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and N. Kumada, On-chip transfer of ultrashort graphene plasmon wave packets using terahertz electronics, Nat. Electron.7, 537–544 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Schwierz and J

    F. Schwierz and J. J. Liou, Rf transistors: Recent developments and roadmap toward terahertz applications, Solid-State Electronics51, 1079 (2007)

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Yoshihara and A

    K. Yoshihara and A. Hiroki, Analysis of saturation velocity and energy relaxation time of electrons in si using full-band monte carlo simulation, Electrical Engineering in Japan211, 40 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    S. A. Sato, P. Tang, M. A. Sentef, U. D. Giovannini, H. H ¨ubener, and A. Rubio, Light-induced anomalous hall effect in massless dirac fermion systems and topological insulators with dissipation, New J. Phys.21, 10.1088/1367-2630/ab3acf (2019)

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab3acf 2019

  11. [11]

    Li and J

    J. Li and J. E. Han, Nonequilibrium excitations and transport of dirac electrons in electric-field-driven graphene, Phys. Rev. B97, 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.205412 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.205412 2018

  12. [12]

    A. Q. Huang and B. Zhang, Comparing sic switching power devices: Mosfet, npn transistor and gto thyristor, Solid-State Electronics44, 325 (2000)

    work page 2000

  13. [13]

    U. Jung, Y . G. Lee, C. G. Kang, S. Lee, J. J. Kim, H. J. Hwang, S. K. Lim, M.-H. Ham, and B. H. Lee, Quan- titatively estimating defects in graphene devices using discharge current analysis method, Scientific Reports4, 4886 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. I. Stockman, Attosecond metrology: from electron capture to future signal processing, Nature Photonics8, 205 (2014). 19

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    T. Wang, K. Hess, and G. J. Iafrate, Time-dependent ensemble Monte Carlo simulation for planar-doped GaAs structures, Journal of Applied Physics58, 857 (1985)

    work page 1985

  16. [16]

    Mics, K.-J

    Z. Mics, K.-J. Tielrooij, K. Parvez, S. A. Jensen, I. Ivanov, X. Feng, K. M ¨ullen, M. Bonn, and D. Turchinovich, Thermodynamic picture of ultrafast charge transport in graphene, Nature Communications6, 7655 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    S. A. Sato and A. Rubio, Nonlinear electric conductivity and thz-induced charge transport in graphene, New Journal of Physics23, 063047 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    T. Fang, A. Konar, H. Xing, and D. Jena, High-field transport in two-dimensional graphene, Phys. Rev. B84, 125450 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Li and J

    J. Li and J. E. Han, Nonequilibrium excitations and transport of dirac electrons in electric-field-driven graphene, Phys. Rev. B97, 205412 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Schiffrin, T

    A. Schiffrin, T. Paasch-Colberg, N. Karpowicz, V . Apalkov, D. Gerster, S. M¨uhlbrandt, M. Korbman, J. Reichert, M. Schultze, S. Holzner, J. V . Barth, R. Kienberger, R. Ernstorfer, V . S. Yakovlev, M. I. Stockman, and F. Krausz, Optical-field-induced current in dielectrics, Nature493, 70 (2013)

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Higuchi, C

    T. Higuchi, C. Heide, K. Ullmann, H. B. Weber, and P. Hommelhoff, Light-field-driven currents in graphene, Nature550, 224 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Ossiander, K

    M. Ossiander, K. Golyari, K. Scharl, L. Lehnert, F. Siegrist, J. P. B ¨urger, D. Zimin, J. A. Gessner, M. Weidman, I. Floss, V . Smejkal, S. Donsa, C. Lemell, F. Libisch, N. Karpowicz, J. Burgd¨orfer, F. Krausz, and M. Schultze, The speed limit of optoelectronics, Nature Communications13, 1620 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Sharma, J

    S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Shallcross, Light-shaping of valley states, Nano Lett.23, 11533 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Rana and G

    N. Rana and G. Dixit, Optical control of ultrafast photocurrent in graphene, Phys, Rev. B110, 054105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Bharti and G

    A. Bharti and G. Dixit, Tailoring photocurrent in weyl semimetals via intense laser irradiation, Phys, Rev. B 108, L161113 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Borsch, M

    M. Borsch, M. Meierhofer, R. Huber, and M. Kira, Lightwave electronics in condensed matter, Nature Reviews Materials8, 668 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Buzek and M

    V . Buzek and M. Hillery, Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem, Phys. Rev. A54, 1844 (1996)

    work page 1996

  28. [28]

    V . V . Dodonov, O. V . Man’ko, V . I. Man’ko, and A. W. and, Hilbert-schmidt distance and non-classicality of states in quantum optics, Journal of Modern Optics47, 633 (2000), https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008233385

    work page doi:10.1080/09500340008233385 2000

  29. [29]

    J.-W. Rhim, K. Kim, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum distance and anomalous landau levels of flat bands, Nature584, 59 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Rhim and B.-J

    J.-W. Rhim and B.-J. Yang, Classification of flat bands according to the band-crossing singularity of bloch wave functions, Phys. Rev. B99, 045107 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Rhim and B.-J

    J.-W. Rhim and B.-J. Yang, Singular flat bands, Advances in Physics: X6, 1901606 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    C.-g. Oh, D. Cho, S. Y . Park, and J.-W. Rhim, Bulk-interface correspondence from quantum distance in flat band systems, Communications Physics5, 320 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Hwang, J

    Y . Hwang, J. Jung, J.-W. Rhim, and B.-J. Yang, Wave-function geometry of band crossing points in two dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. B103, L241102 (2021). 20

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Oh, S.-W

    C.-g. Oh, S.-W. Kim, K. W. Kim, B. Monserrat, and J.-W. Rhim, Universal optical conductivity from quantum geometry in quadratic band-touching semimetals, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18372 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Y .-Q. Ma, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, Abelian and non-abelian quantum geometric tensor, Phys. Rev. B 81, 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.245129 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.245129 2010

  36. [36]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨orm¨a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00098 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Y . Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.166601 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.166601 2014

  38. [38]

    Gao, Y .-F

    A. Gao, Y .-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V . Trevisan, Y . Onishi, C. Hu, T. Qian, H.-J. Tien, S.-W. Chen, M. Huang, D. B ´erub´e, H. Li, C. Tzschaschel, T. Dinh, Z. Sun, S.-C. Ho, S.-W. Lien, B. Singh, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. C. Bell, H. Lin, T.-R. Chang, C. R. Du, A. Bansil, L. Fu, N. Ni, P. P. Orth, Q. Ma, and S.- Y . Xu, Quantum metric nonlin...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adf15 2023

  39. [39]

    K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park, and P. L. McEuen, The valley hall effect in mos2 transistors, Science344, 10.1126/science.125014 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.125014 2014

  40. [40]

    J. Yin, C. Tan, D. Barcons-Ruiz, I. Torre1, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. W. Song, J. Hone, and F. H. L. Koppens, Tunable and giant valley-selective hall effect in gapped bilayer graphene, Science375, 10.1126/sci- ence.abl4266 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1126/sci- 2022

  41. [41]

    Oh, J.-W

    C.-g. Oh, J.-W. Rhim, and B.-J. Yang, Revisiting the magnetic responses of bilayer graphene from the perspective of quantum distance, Physical Review B110, 155412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    C.-g. Oh, D. Cho, S. Y . Park, and J.-W. Rhim, Bulk-interface correspondence from quantum distance in flat band systems, Commun. Phys.5, 10.1038/s42005-022-01102-y (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-022-01102-y 2022

  43. [43]

    C.-g. Oh, K. W. Kim, and J.-W. Rhim, Thermoelectric transport driven by the hilbert–schmidt distance, Adv. Sci.11, http://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202411313 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202411313 2024

  44. [44]

    Bhalla, K

    P. Bhalla, K. Das, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Resonant second-harmonic generation as a probe of quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.227401 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.227401 2022

  45. [45]

    Ghosh, Y

    B. Ghosh, Y . Onishi, S.-Y . Xu, H. Lin, L. Fu, and A. Bansil, Probing quantum geometry through optical con- ductivity and magnetic circular dichroism, Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 10.1126/sciadv.ado1761 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado1761 2024

  46. [46]

    A. M. Cook, B. M. Fregoso, F. d. Juan, S. Coh, and J. E. Moore, Design principles for shift current photovoltaics, Nat. Commun.8, 10.1038/ncomms14176 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms14176 2017

  47. [47]

    T ¨orm¨a, S

    P. T ¨orm¨a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Superconductivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 528 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T ¨orm¨a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nat. Commun.6, 8944 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨orm¨a, Band geometry, Berry curvature, and superfluid weight, Phys. Rev. B95, 024515 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Verma, D

    N. Verma, D. Guerci, and R. Queiroz, Geometric stiffness in interlayer exciton condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236001 (2024). 21

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    X. Hu, T. Hyart, D. I. Pikulin, and E. Rossi, Quantum-metric-enabled exciton condensate in double twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B105, L140506 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Neupert, C

    T. Neupert, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Measuring the quantum geometry of bloch bands with current noise, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics87, 245103 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    W. J. Jankowski, J. J. Thompson, B. Monserrat, and R.-J. Slager, Excitonic topology and quantum geometry in organic semiconductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11951 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Resta, Polarization fluctuations in insulators and metals: New and old theories merge, Phys

    R. Resta, Polarization fluctuations in insulators and metals: New and old theories merge, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 137601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Quantum metric in step response, arXiv:2406.17845 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Bouhon, A

    A. Bouhon, A. Timmel, and R. Slager, Quantum geometry beyond projective single bands, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.02180 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Komissarov, T

    I. Komissarov, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, The quantum geometric origin of capacitance in insulators, Nat. Commun.15, 4621 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    D. A. Neamen,Semiconductor Physics and Devices: Basic Principles, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, 2011)

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    D ´ora and R

    B. D ´ora and R. Moessner, Nonlinear electric transport in graphene: Quantum quench dynamics and the schwinger mechanism, Phys. Rev. B81, 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.165431 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.165431 2010

  60. [60]

    Meier, G

    T. Meier, G. von Plessen, P. Thomas, and S. W. Koch, Coherent electric-field effects in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.902 (1994)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.73.902 1994

  61. [61]

    S. A. Sato, U. D. Giovannini, S. Aeschlimann, I. Gierz, H. H ¨ubener, and A. Rubio, Floquet states in dissipative open quantum systems, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.53, 10.1088/1361-6455/abb127 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6455/abb127 2020

  62. [62]

    As the switching duration is reduced, the rise time approaches zero

    In numerical calculations, a nearly step-like electric field with a finite switching duration is used, leading to a small but finite rise time. As the switching duration is reduced, the rise time approaches zero

    work page

  63. [63]

    Boross, B

    P. Boross, B. D ´ora, and R. Moessner, Testing the dirac equation against the tight binding model for non- equilibrium graphene, Phys. Status Solidi B248, 10.1002/pssb.201100184 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.201100184 2011

  64. [64]

    Tanji, Dynamical view of pair creation in uniform electric and magnetic fields, Annals of Physics324, 1691 (2009)

    N. Tanji, Dynamical view of pair creation in uniform electric and magnetic fields, Annals of Physics324, 1691 (2009)

    work page 2009

  65. [65]

    Y . Chen, S. Xu, Y . Xie, C. Zhong, C. Wu, and S. B. Zhang, Ferromagnetism and wigner crystallization in kagome graphene and related structures, Phys. Rev. B98, 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035135 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.035135 2018

  66. [66]

    S. Xing, T. Zhao, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, Strain-modulated phase transition in 2d v 33f8 kagome lattice with topo- logical flat band, J. Phys. Chem. C128, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c07068 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c07068 2024

  67. [67]

    W. A. Hadi, R. Cheekoori, M. S. Shur, and S. K. O’Leary, Transient electron transport in the iii–v compound semiconductors gallium arsenide and gallium nitride, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron24, 10.1007/s10854-012- 0818-2 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-012- 2013

  68. [68]

    J. G. Ruch, Electron dynamics in short channel field-effect transistors, IEEE Transac. on Elect. Dev.19, 10.1109/T-ED.1972.17468 (1972)

    work page doi:10.1109/t-ed.1972.17468 1972

  69. [69]

    S. L. Teitel and J. W. Wilkins, Ballistic transport and velocity overshoot in semiconductors: Part i-uniform field effects, IEEE Transac. on Elect. Dev.30, 10.1109/T-ED.1983.21088 (1983). 22

    work page doi:10.1109/t-ed.1983.21088 1983

  70. [70]

    C. G. Rodrigues, A. R. Vasconcellos, R. Luzzi, and V . N. Freire, Nonlinear transport properties of doped iii-n and gaas polar semiconductors: A comparison, Journal of Applied Physics98, 10.1063/1.1999025 (2005)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1999025 2005

  71. [71]

    Sebastian, R

    A. Sebastian, R. Pendurthi, T. H. Choudhury, J. M. Redwing, and S. Das, Benchmarking monolayer mos2 and ws2 field-effect transistors, Nature Communications12, 693 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    J. Cai, Z. Sun, P. Wu, R. Tripathi, H.-Y . Lan, J. Kong, Z. Chen, and J. Appenzeller, High-performance comple- mentary circuits from two-dimensional mote2, Nano Lett.23, 10939–10945 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    S. A. Sato, H. Hirori, Y . Sanari, Y . Kanemitsu, and A. Rubio, High-order harmonic generation in graphene: Nonlinear coupling of intraband and interband transitions, Phys. Rev. B103, 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L041408 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.l041408 2021

  74. [74]

    Yoshikawa, T

    N. Yoshikawa, T. Tamaya, and K. Tanaka, High-harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically po- larized light excitation, Science356, 10.1126/science.aam8861 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aam8861 2017

  75. [75]

    21, 9403–9409, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02538 (2021)

    C. Heide, T. Eckstein, T. Boolakee, C. Gerner, H. B. Weber, I. Franco, and P. Hommelhoff, Elec- tronic coherence and coherent dephasing in the optical control of electrons in graphene, Nano Lett.21, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02538 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02538 2021

  76. [76]

    Z. Nie, R. Long, L. Sun, C.-C. Huang, J. Zhang, Q. Xiong, D. W. Hewak, Z. Shen, O. V . Prezhdo, and Z.-H. Loh, Ultrafast carrier thermalization and cooling dynamics in few-layer mos2, Nano Lett.8, 10.1021/nn504760x (2014)

    work page doi:10.1021/nn504760x 2014

  77. [77]

    Malic, T

    E. Malic, T. Winzer, E. Bobkin, and A. Knorr, Microscopic theory of absorption and ultrafast many-particle kinetics in graphene, Phys. Rev. B84, 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.205406 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.205406 2011

  78. [78]

    Y . Ren, L. Jia, Y . Zhang, Z. Zhang, S. Xue, S. Yue, and H. Du, Orientation dependence of even-order harmonics generation in biased bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. A106, 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.033123 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.033123 2022

  79. [79]

    McCann and V

    E. McCann and V . I. Fal’ko, Landau-level degeneracy and quantum hall effect in a graphite bilayer, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.086805 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.086805 2006

  80. [80]

    Meineke, M

    C. Meineke, M. Prager, J. Hayes, Q. Wen, L. Z. Kastner, D. Schuh, K. Fritsch, O. Pronin, M. Stein, F. Sch ¨afer, S. Chatterjee, M. Kira, H. R, and D. Bougeard, Scalable high-repetition-rate sub-half-cycle terahertz pulses from spatially indirect interband transitions, Light Sci. Appl.11(2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.