pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17826 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Three-dimensional visualization of lattice defects in β-Ga₂O₃ via synchrotron-radiation Borrmann-effect X-ray topo-tomography

Yongzhao Yao , Daiki Katsube , Hirotaka Yamaguchi , Shinya Yamaguchi , Daiki Wakimoto , Hironobu Miyamoto , Yukari Ishikawa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords beta-Ga2O3dislocationsX-ray topographyBorrmann effect3D reconstructionsynchrotron radiationepitaxial layerslattice defects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rotating beta-Ga2O3 samples about the diffraction vector encodes depth positions of dislocations in X-ray images.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to obtain three-dimensional images of individual dislocations inside beta-gallium oxide crystals. Under two-beam Borrmann conditions in transmission X-ray topography, the team rotates the sample about the diffraction vector while recording a series of topographic images. The resulting changes in dislocation contrast supply the depth information needed to separate defects lying in the thin epilayer from those in the thicker substrate. This separation matters because dislocations strongly influence the electrical performance of power devices fabricated on this material. A reader would care because the approach supplies the first non-destructive, depth-resolved view of defect distributions in a crystal where such defects limit device yield and reliability.

Core claim

Three-dimensional visualization of dislocations in β-Ga₂O₃ is achieved by acquiring a series of synchrotron-radiation X-ray topo-tomographic images at different rotation angles about the diffraction vector under two-beam Borrmann-effect conditions; the evolution of dislocation contrast in these images provides intuitive, depth-resolved positions that clearly separate dislocations in the epilayer from those in the substrate of Schottky barrier diode structures.

What carries the argument

Rotation about the diffraction vector in Borrmann-effect transmission X-ray topo-tomography, which converts angular contrast changes into depth coordinates for each dislocation line.

If this is right

  • Dislocations located inside the epilayer can be distinguished from those that originate in the substrate.
  • Propagation paths of defects from substrate into epilayer become visible during epitaxial growth.
  • Device engineers can correlate specific three-dimensional defect locations with electrical characteristics of Schottky diodes.
  • The same rotation protocol can be repeated on multiple samples to compare defect densities under different growth conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique could be extended to other wide-bandgap semiconductors where non-destructive 3D defect mapping is currently unavailable.
  • If paired with device-level electrical mapping on the same wafer, it would allow direct assignment of leakage paths to particular dislocation segments.
  • Quantitative contrast modeling might turn the method into a tool for measuring Burgers vectors in addition to positions.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that observed contrast evolution with rotation angle maps directly to accurate three-dimensional positions without significant overlap or projection ambiguities.

What would settle it

Destructive cross-sectioning of the same sample by focused-ion-beam milling followed by electron microscopy to check whether the X-ray-reconstructed depths match the physical locations of the same dislocation lines.

read the original abstract

beta-Ga2O3 is a promising material for next-generation power electronics; however, its performance is strongly affected by lattice defects such as dislocations. In this study, we demonstrate three-dimensional (3D) visualization of dislocations in \b{eta}-Ga2O3 using synchrotron-radiation X-ray topo-tomography under a two-beam Borrmann-effect condition in transmission X-ray topography. By rotating the sample about the diffraction vector and acquiring a series of topo-tomographic images at different rotation angles, the evolution of dislocation contrast is captured, providing intuitive, depth-resolved visualization of dislocations. This method enables clear separation of dislocations in the epilayer and substrate in Schottky barrier diode structures, offering insight into dislocation propagation and their impact on epitaxial growth and device performance. This study represents the first demonstration of 3D dislocation reconstruction in beta-Ga2O3.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims the first demonstration of three-dimensional visualization of dislocations in β-Ga₂O₃ via synchrotron-radiation X-ray topo-tomography under two-beam Borrmann conditions in transmission geometry. By rotating the crystal about the diffraction vector g and acquiring a series of topographs, the evolution of dislocation contrast is used to achieve depth-resolved imaging that separates epilayer and substrate defects in Schottky barrier diode structures.

Significance. If the 3D mapping is reliable, the work would be significant for materials science of ultra-wide-bandgap semiconductors, providing non-destructive insight into dislocation propagation during epitaxial growth that affects device performance in power electronics. The Borrmann-effect approach offers enhanced transmission contrast, and the experimental demonstration of rotation-based visualization is a practical advance.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim of unambiguous 3D dislocation reconstruction rests on the assumption that contrast evolution under rotation about g directly yields accurate depth positions. However, the manuscript provides no explicit reconstruction algorithm (e.g., filtered back-projection, algebraic tomography, or forward modeling), no quantitative validation against known defect densities or simulations, and no error analysis for projection overlaps or non-straight dislocations, leaving the mapping under-constrained.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and results sections assert successful separation of epilayer versus substrate dislocations and 'intuitive, depth-resolved visualization,' but supply no supporting images, contrast metrics, depth-resolution values, or cross-checks with other techniques, which are load-bearing for the 'first demonstration' claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the diffraction vector (g) and rotation angles should be defined consistently in the methods to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including the number of rotation angles acquired and the achieved spatial resolution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the scope and presentation of our work on Borrmann-effect X-ray topo-tomography for 3D dislocation visualization in β-Ga₂O₃. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the manuscript while agreeing where revisions are warranted to strengthen the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of unambiguous 3D dislocation reconstruction rests on the assumption that contrast evolution under rotation about g directly yields accurate depth positions. However, the manuscript provides no explicit reconstruction algorithm (e.g., filtered back-projection, algebraic tomography, or forward modeling), no quantitative validation against known defect densities or simulations, and no error analysis for projection overlaps or non-straight dislocations, leaving the mapping under-constrained.

    Authors: We clarify that the method is not a standard computed tomography reconstruction employing algorithms such as filtered back-projection or algebraic techniques. It instead exploits the depth-dependent contrast modulation inherent to the two-beam Borrmann effect in transmission geometry: as the crystal is rotated about the diffraction vector g, the effective absorption and diffraction conditions cause dislocation images to appear, disappear, or shift in a manner that encodes their depth position relative to the Borrmann fan. This yields an intuitive, qualitative 3D visualization without requiring a full inverse reconstruction. We acknowledge that the original manuscript does not provide an explicit algorithmic description, quantitative validation, or error analysis for cases such as projection overlaps or curved dislocations. In revision we will add a dedicated methods subsection with a forward-model schematic based on Borrmann theory, an estimate of depth sensitivity from the angular step size and extinction distance, and an explicit discussion of limitations for non-straight defects. The primary evidence remains the observed separation of epilayer versus substrate contrast behavior, which is consistent with the known diode structure. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results sections assert successful separation of epilayer versus substrate dislocations and 'intuitive, depth-resolved visualization,' but supply no supporting images, contrast metrics, depth-resolution values, or cross-checks with other techniques, which are load-bearing for the 'first demonstration' claim.

    Authors: The results section already presents a sequence of topographs acquired at successive rotation angles about g, together with the composite visualization that distinguishes epilayer and substrate dislocations on the basis of their distinct contrast evolution. Nevertheless, we agree that the abstract and main text would benefit from explicit quantitative anchors. In the revised manuscript we will insert estimated depth resolution (derived from the Borrmann fan geometry and angular sampling), contrast metrics (peak-to-background intensity ratios across the rotation series), and a brief note that cross-validation against etch-pit or TEM data lies outside the present scope. These additions will more robustly support the claim that this constitutes the first demonstration of rotation-based Borrmann topo-tomography for 3D defect mapping in β-Ga₂O₃. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely experimental imaging demonstration

full rationale

The paper describes an experimental synchrotron X-ray topo-tomography technique under Borrmann conditions, where 3D dislocation visualization is achieved by rotating the sample about the diffraction vector g and recording contrast evolution in transmission topographs. No equations, fitted parameters, ansatzes, or derivation chains appear in the abstract or described method. The central claim of first 3D reconstruction in beta-Ga2O3 is presented as a direct observational demonstration rather than a result derived from prior fitted quantities or self-citations. Any self-citations (if present in the full text) are not load-bearing for a mathematical result. The skeptic concern about projection ambiguities is a question of experimental validation and correctness, not circularity per the rules. The work is self-contained as an imaging report against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work is an experimental demonstration of an imaging technique rather than a theoretical derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5486 in / 1119 out tokens · 43966 ms · 2026-05-10T04:46:01.013772+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sasaki, Prospects for β-Ga2O3: now and into the future, Appl

    K. Sasaki, Prospects for β-Ga2O3: now and into the future, Appl. Phys. Express 17, 090101-1 (2024). [DOI:10.35848/1882-0786/ad6b73]

    work page doi:10.35848/1882-0786/ad6b73 2024

  2. [2]

    Pearton, J

    S. Pearton, J. Yang, P. Cary, F. Ren, J. Kim, M. Tadjer, and M. Mastro, A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices, Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 011301 (2018). [DOI:10.1063/1.5006941]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5006941 2018

  3. [3]

    Pearton, F

    S. Pearton, F. Ren, M. Tadjer, and J. Kim, Perspective: Ga 2O3 for ultra-high power rectifiers and MOSFETS, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 220901 (2018). [DOI:10.1063/1.5062841]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5062841 2018

  4. [4]

    Higashiwaki, β -Ga2O3 material properties, growth technologies, and devices: a review, AAPPS Bull

    M. Higashiwaki, β -Ga2O3 material properties, growth technologies, and devices: a review, AAPPS Bull. 32, 3 (2022). [DOI:10.1007/s43673-021-00033-0]

    work page doi:10.1007/s43673-021-00033-0 2022

  5. [5]

    O. Ueda, M. Kasu, and H. Yamaguchi, Structural characterization of defects in EFG - and HVPE-grown β-Ga2O3 crystals, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 61, 050101 (2022). [DOI:10.35848/1347- 4065/ac4b6b]

    work page doi:10.35848/1347- 2022

  6. [6]

    Sdoeung, K

    S. Sdoeung, K. Sasaki, K. Kawasaki, J. Hirabayashi, A. Kuramata, T. Oishi, and M. Kasu, Line- shaped defects: Origin of leakage current in halide vapor -phase epitaxial (001) β -Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diodes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 122107 (2022). [DOI:10.1063/5.0088284]

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0088284 2022

  7. [7]

    Sdoeung, K

    S. Sdoeung, K. Sasaki, S. Masuya, K. Kawasaki, J. Hirabayashi, A. Kuramata, and M. Kasu, Stacking faults: Origin of leakage current in halide vapor phase epitaxial (001) β -Ga 2O3 Schottky barrier diodes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 172106 (2021). [DOI:10.1063/5.0049761]

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0049761 2021

  8. [8]

    Sdoeung, K

    S. Sdoeung, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, and M. Kasu, Identification of dislocation responsible for leakage current in halide vapor phase epitaxial (001) β -Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diodes investigated via ultrahigh -sensitive emission microscopy and synchrotron X- ray topography, Appl. Phys. Express 15, 111001 (2022). [DOI:10.35848/1882-0786/ac9726]

    work page doi:10.35848/1882-0786/ac9726 2022

  9. [9]

    Hanada, T

    K. Hanada, T. Moribayashi, K. Koshi, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, O. Ueda, and M. Kasu, Origins of etch pits in β -Ga 2O3(010) single crystals, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 1202BG (2016). [DOI:10.7567/JJAP.55.1202BG]

    work page doi:10.7567/jjap.55.1202bg 2016

  10. [10]

    M. Kasu, T. Oshima, K. Hanada, T. Moribayashi, A. Hashiguchi, T. Oishi, K. Koshi, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, and O. Ueda, Crystal defects observed by the etch-pit method and their effects on Schottky-barrier-diode characteristics on ( -201) β -Ga2O3, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56, 091101 (2017). [DOI:10.7567/JJAP.56.091101]

    work page doi:10.7567/jjap.56.091101 2017

  11. [11]

    Ogawa, N

    K. Ogawa, N. Ogawa, R. Kosaka, T. Isshiki, T. Aiso, M. Iyoki, Y. Yao, and Y. Ishikawa, AFM observation of etch- pit shapes on β -Ga2O3 (001) surface formed by molten alkali etching, Mater. Sci. Forum 1004, 512 (2020). [DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1004.512]

    work page doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1004.512 2020

  12. [12]

    Y. Yao, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, Observation of dislocations in β -Ga2O3 single-crystal substrates by synchrotron X -ray topography, chemical etching, and transmission electron microscopy, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 59, 045502 (2020). [DOI:10.35848/1347-4065/ab7dda]

    work page doi:10.35848/1347-4065/ab7dda 2020

  13. [13]

    Y. Yao, Y. Sugawara, K. Sato, D. Yokoe, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, and Y. Ishikawa, Etch pit formation on β -Ga 2O3 by molten KOH+NaOH and hot H3PO4 and their correlation with dislocations, J. Alloys Compd. 910, 164788 (2022). [DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164788]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164788 2022

  14. [14]

    Y. Yao, Y. Ishikawa, and Y. Sugawara, Revelation of dislocations in β-Ga2O3 substrates grown by edge -defined film -fed growth, Phys. Status Solidi A 217, 1900630 (2020). [DOI:10.1002/pssa.201900630]

    work page doi:10.1002/pssa.201900630 2020

  15. [15]

    Y. Yao, D. Wakimoto, H. Miyamoto, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, K. Hirano, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, X-ray topographic observation of dislocations in β-Ga 2O3 Schottky barrier diodes and their glide and multiplication under reverse bias, Scr. Mater. 226, 115216 (2023). [DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115216] 15

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115216 2023

  16. [16]

    Y. Yao, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, Identification of Burgers vectors of dislocations in monoclinic β-Ga2O3 via synchrotron x -ray topography, J. Appl. Phys. 127, 205110 (2020). [DOI:10.1063/5.0007229]

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0007229 2020

  17. [17]

    Y. Yao, K. Hirano, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, Lattice misorientation at domain boundaries in β -Ga2O3 single-crystal substrates observed via synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction imaging and X-ray reticulography, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 106, 5487 (2023). [DOI:10.1111/jace.19156]

    work page doi:10.1111/jace.19156 2023

  18. [18]

    Yamaguchi, A

    H. Yamaguchi, A. Kuramata, and T. Masui, Slip system analysis and x-ray topographic study on β-Ga2O3, Superlattice Microst. 99, 99 (2016). [DOI:10.1016/j.spmi.2016.04.030]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2016.04.030 2016

  19. [19]

    Yamaguchi and A

    H. Yamaguchi and A. Kuramata, Stacking faults in β -Ga2O3 crystals observed by X -ray topography, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51, 1372 (2018). [DOI:10.1107/S1600576718011093]

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600576718011093 2018

  20. [20]

    Masuya, K

    S. Masuya, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, S. Yamakoshi, O. Ueda, and M. Kasu, Characterization of crystalline defects in β -Ga2O3 single crystals grown by edge -defined film-fed growth and halide vapor -phase epitaxy using synchrotron X -ray topography, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, 055501 (2019). [DOI:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0dba]

    work page doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab0dba 2019

  21. [21]

    Mahadik, M

    N. Mahadik, M. Tadjer, P. Bonanno, K. Hobart, R. Stahlbush, T. Anderson, and A. Kuramata, High-resolution dislocation imaging and micro -structural analysis of HVPE -β-Ga2O3 films using monochromatic synchrotron topography, APL Mater. 7, 022513 (2019). [DOI:10.1063/1.5051633]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5051633 2019

  22. [22]

    Y. Yao, K. Hirano, Y. Sugawara, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, and Y. Ishikawa, Observation of dislocations in thick β-Ga 2O3 single-crystal substrates using Borrmann effect synchrotron x- ray topography, APL Mater. 10, 051101 (2022). [DOI:10.1063/5.0088701]

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0088701 2022

  23. [23]

    Y. Yao, Y. Tsusaka, K. Hirano, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, Three- dimensional distribution and propagation of dislocations in β-Ga2O3 revealed by Borrmann effect X-ray topography, J. Appl. Phys. 134, 155104 (2023). [DOI:10.1063/5.0169526]

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0169526 2023

  24. [24]

    Y. Yao, Y. Tsusaka, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, Y. Sugawara, and Y. Ishikawa, Large -area total- thickness imaging and Burgers vector analysis of dislocations in β -Ga2O3 using bright-field x-ray topography based on anomalous transmission, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 012105 (2022). [DOI:10.1063/5.0098942]

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0098942 2022

  25. [25]

    Ishikawa, D

    Y. Ishikawa, D. Katsube, Y. Yao, K. Sato, and K. Sasaki, High -speed, high-resolution, three- dimensional imaging of threading dislocations in β -Ga2O3 via phase-contrast microscopy, APL Mater. 14, 021104 (2026). [DOI:10.1063/5.0294098]

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0294098 2026

  26. [26]

    Isaji, I

    S. Isaji, I. Maeda, N. Ogawa, R. Kosaka, N. Hasuike, T. Isshiki, K. Kobayashi, Y. Yao, and Y. Ishikawa, Relationship between propagation angle of dislocations in β -Ga2O3 (001) bulk wafers and their etch pit shapes, J. Electron. Mater. 52, 5093 (2023). [DOI:10.1007/s11664- 023-10363-4]

    work page doi:10.1007/s11664- 2023

  27. [27]

    Nakai, T

    K. Nakai, T. Nagai, K. Noami, and T. Futagi, Characterization of defects in β -Ga2O3 single crystals, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 54, 051103 (2015). [DOI:10.7567/JJAP.54.051103]

    work page doi:10.7567/jjap.54.051103 2015

  28. [28]

    Ogawa, K

    K. Ogawa, K. Kobayashi, N. Hasuike, and T. Isshiki, Crystal structure analysis of stacking faults through scanning transmission electron microscopy of β-Ga2O3 (001) layer grown via halide vapor phase epitaxy, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 40, 032701 (2022). [DOI:10.1116/6.0001799]

    work page doi:10.1116/6.0001799 2022

  29. [29]

    O. Ueda, N. Ikenaga, K. Koshi, K. Iizuka, A. Kuramata, K. Hanada, T. Moribayashi, S. Yamakoshi, and M. Kasu, Structural evaluation of defects in β -Ga2O3 single crystals grown by edge - defined film -fed growth process, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 1202BD (2016). [DOI:10.7567/JJAP.55.1202BD]

    work page doi:10.7567/jjap.55.1202bd 2016

  30. [30]

    Islam, M

    Z. Islam, M. Xian, A. Haque, F. Ren, M. Tadjer, N. Glavin, and S. Pearton, In situ observation of β-Ga2O3 schottky diode failure under forward biasing condition, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 67, 3056 (2020). [DOI:10.1109/TED.2020.3000441] 16

    work page doi:10.1109/ted.2020.3000441 2020

  31. [31]

    Islam, A

    Z. Islam, A. Haque, N. Glavin, M. Xian, F. Ren, A. Polyakov, A. Kochkova, M. Tadjer, and S. Pearton, In situ transmission electron microscopy observations of forward bias degradation of vertical geometry β -Ga2O3 rectifiers, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 9, 055008 (2020). [DOI:10.1149/2162-8777/ab981d]

    work page doi:10.1149/2162-8777/ab981d 2020

  32. [32]

    Nishikawa, K

    T. Nishikawa, K. Goto, H. Murakami, Y. Kumagai, M. Uemukai, T. Tanikawa, and R. Katayama, Observation of nanopipes in edge-defined film-fed grown β-Ga2O3 substrate and their effect on homoepitaxial surface hillocks, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 62, SF1015 (2023). [DOI:10.35848/1347-4065/acc18e]

    work page doi:10.35848/1347-4065/acc18e 2023

  33. [33]

    Tanikawa, K

    T. Tanikawa, K. Ohnishi, M. Kanoh, T. Mukai, and T. Matsuoka, Three -dimensional imaging of threading dislocations in GaN crystals using two -photon excitation photoluminescence, Appl. Phys. Express 11, 031004 (2018). [DOI:10.7567/APEX.11.031004]

    work page doi:10.7567/apex.11.031004 2018

  34. [34]

    Usami, Y

    S. Usami, Y. Ando, A. Tanaka, K. Nagamatsu, M. Deki, M. Kushimoto, S. Nitta, Y. Honda, H. Amano, Y. Sugawara, Y. Yao, and Y. Ishikawa, Correlation between dislocations and leakage current of p-n diodes on a free-standing GaN substrate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 182106 (2018). [DOI:10.1063/1.5024704]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5024704 2018

  35. [35]

    Suvorov, I

    E. Suvorov, I. Smirnova, and E. Shulakov, Features of X -ray diffraction at elastic deformations near the dislocation axis in section topography techniques, J. Surf. Investig.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 1, 498 (2007). [DOI:10.1134/s1027451007050023]

    work page doi:10.1134/s1027451007050023 2007

  36. [36]

    Lang, The early days of high -resolution X-ray topography, J

    A. Lang, The early days of high -resolution X-ray topography, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 26, A1 (1993). [DOI:10.1088/0022-3727/26/4a/001]

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/26/4a/001 1993

  37. [37]

    A.C. Kak, M. Slaney, Principles of computerized tomographic imaging, IEEE Press, New York, (1999) p.1–p.48

    work page 1999

  38. [38]

    On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds

    J. Radon, On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 5, 170 (1986). [DOI:10.1109/TMI.1986.4307775]

    work page doi:10.1109/tmi.1986.4307775 1986

  39. [39]

    Ludwig, P

    W. Ludwig, P. Cloetens, J. Härtwig, J. Baruchel, B. Hamelin, and P. Bastie, Three-dimensional imaging of crystal defects by 'topo -tomography', J. Appl. Crystallogr. 34, 602 (2001). [DOI:10.1107/S002188980101086X]

    work page doi:10.1107/s002188980101086x 2001

  40. [40]

    Kajiwara, S

    K. Kajiwara, S. Kawado, S. Iida, Y. Suzuki, and Y. Chikaura, Features of dislocation images reconstructed from step-scanned white x-ray section topographs, Phys. Status Solidi A 204, 2682 (2007). [DOI:10.1002/pssa.200675677]

    work page doi:10.1002/pssa.200675677 2007

  41. [41]

    Asadchikov, A

    V. Asadchikov, A. Buzmakov, F. Chukhovskii, I. Dyachkova, D. Zolotov, A. Danilewsky, T. Baumbach, S. Bode, S. Haaga, D. Hänschke, M. Kabukcuoglu, M. Balzer, M. Caselle, and E. Suvorov, X-ray topo-tomography studies of linear dislocations in silicon single crystals, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51, 1616 (2018). [DOI:10.1107/s160057671801419x]

    work page doi:10.1107/s160057671801419x 2018

  42. [42]

    Hänschke, L

    D. Hänschke, L. Helfen, V. Altapova, A. Danilewsky, and T. Baumbach, Three -dimensional imaging of dislocations by X- ray diffraction laminography, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 244103 (2012). [DOI:10.1063/1.4769988]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4769988 2012

  43. [43]

    Baruchel, J

    J. Baruchel, J. Härtwig, and P. Pernot -Rejmánková, Present state and perspectives of synchrotron radiation diffraction imaging, J. Synchrotron Rad. 9, 107 (2002). [DOI:10.1107/s0909049502004041]

    work page doi:10.1107/s0909049502004041 2002

  44. [44]

    Y. Yao, Y. Sugawara, Y. Ishikawa, and K. Hirano, X-ray topography of crystallographic defects in wide-bandgap semiconductors using a high-resolution digital camera, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 60, 010908 (2021). [DOI:10.35848/1347-4065/abd2dd]

    work page doi:10.35848/1347-4065/abd2dd 2021

  45. [45]

    Borrmann, Die Absorption von Röntgenstrahlen im Fall der Interferenz, Z

    G. Borrmann, Die Absorption von Röntgenstrahlen im Fall der Interferenz, Z. Phys. 127, 297 (1950). [DOI:10.1007/BF01329828]

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01329828 1950

  46. [46]

    Batterman and H

    B. Batterman and H. Cole, Dynamical diffraction of X rays by perfect crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 681 (1964). [DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.36.681] 17

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.36.681 1964

  47. [47]

    Yamaguchi, S

    H. Yamaguchi, S. Watanabe, Y. Yamaoka, K. Koshi, and A. Kuramata, Mechanical properties and dislocation dynamics in β -Ga2O3, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 61, 045506 (2022). [DOI:10.35848/1347-4065/ac5adb]

    work page doi:10.35848/1347-4065/ac5adb 2022

  48. [48]

    Y. Yao, Y. Ishikawa, and Y. Sugawara, Slip planes in monoclinic β -Ga2O3 revealed from its {010} face via synchrotron X -ray diffraction and X -ray topography, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 59, 125501 (2020). [DOI:10.35848/1347-4065/abc1aa]

    work page doi:10.35848/1347-4065/abc1aa 2020

  49. [49]

    Hoshino, K

    M. Hoshino, K. Uesugi, A. Takeuchi, Y. Suzuki, and N. Yagi, Development of an X -ray micro- laminography system at SPring -8, AIP Conf. Proc. 1365, 250 (2011). [DOI:10.1063/1.3625351]

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3625351 2011

  50. [50]

    Fisher, D

    S. Fisher, D. Holmes, J. Jørgensen, P. Gajjar, J. Behnsen, W. Lionheart, and P. Withers, Laminography in the lab: imaging planar objects using a conventional x -ray CT scanner, Meas. Sci. Technol. 30, 035401 (2019). [DOI:10.1088/1361-6501/aafcae]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6501/aafcae 2019

  51. [51]

    e”) are observed in close proximity to tangled substrate dislocations (labeled “s

    A.C. Kak, M. Slaney, Principles of computerized tomographic imaging, IEEE Press, New York, (1999) p.56–p.60 18 Figure 1. (a) Photograph of the optical system; (b) Photograph of the fluorescent screen under the Bragg condition for the Borrmann effect; (c) Geometrical configuration of the system viewed from the top of the goniometer. 19 Figure 2. (a)–(e) X-...

    work page 1999