pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18723 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Model-independent reconstruction of cosmic thermodynamics and dark energy dynamics

Afaq Maqsood , Tanima Duary
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmic thermodynamicsmodel-independent reconstructionGaussian processdark energy equation of stategeneralized second lawHubble parameterapparent horizonLambdaCDM
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reconstructed expansion history confirms the generalized second law holds and the universe approaches thermodynamic equilibrium with dark energy consistent with a cosmological constant today.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors apply Gaussian Process regression to combined cosmic chronometer, DESI, and supernova datasets to reconstruct the Hubble parameter and its derivatives without assuming any specific dark energy model. From these reconstructions they compute thermodynamic quantities tied to the apparent horizon, including a diagnostic function P(z) that checks the generalized second law, the total entropy production rate, and the second derivative of that rate. The calculations show P(z) stays positive at all redshifts examined, entropy production remains positive, and the second derivative turns negative at low redshifts, pointing to evolution toward stable equilibrium. The same data-driven approach yields a dark energy equation of state that matches a cosmological constant at the present epoch with no significant deviation from LambdaCDM across multiple supernova samples and kernel choices.

Core claim

Gaussian Process regression on CC32 plus DESI DR2 combined with Pantheon+, Union3, or DES Y5 data reconstructs the Hubble parameter from redshift zero to two. This supplies the derivatives needed to evaluate the apparent-horizon thermodynamic diagnostic P(z), the entropy production rate dot S_tot, and its second derivative ddot S_tot. The results show P(z) positive everywhere, dot S_tot positive throughout, and ddot S_tot negative at low redshifts, establishing that the generalized second law is satisfied and the universe is moving toward thermodynamic equilibrium. The identical reconstruction gives a dark energy equation of state consistent with the value negative one at the present time.

What carries the argument

Gaussian Process regression using Squared Exponential and Matern kernels with nu equal to 5/2, 7/2, and 9/2 to obtain the Hubble parameter and its first and second derivatives from combined observational datasets for thermodynamic evaluation.

If this is right

  • The generalized second law of thermodynamics remains valid for the apparent horizon over the full redshift range studied.
  • Positive entropy production rate confirms that cosmic expansion is irreversible.
  • Negative second derivative of total entropy at low redshifts indicates the universe is approaching a state of stable thermodynamic equilibrium.
  • Dark energy equation of state shows no statistically significant evolution away from a cosmological constant at the present epoch.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same reconstruction to higher redshifts with future surveys could test whether the approach to equilibrium continues or changes.
  • The method provides a template for checking other horizon-based thermodynamic relations in a model-independent way once more precise distance data become available.
  • If small deviations from LambdaCDM appear in future higher-precision samples, they would have to be large enough to flip the sign of P(z) to contradict the current thermodynamic conclusions.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen Gaussian Process kernels recover the true underlying Hubble parameter and its derivatives from the data without introducing systematic errors that would distort the thermodynamic quantities.

What would settle it

New observations at any redshift in 0 to 2 that yield a negative value for the thermodynamic diagnostic P(z) or a statistically significant departure of the reconstructed dark energy equation of state from negative one at low redshift.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18723 by Afaq Maqsood, Tanima Duary.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform a model-independent investigation of the thermodynamic evolution of the Universe by reconstructing the expansion history from observational data using Gaussian Process regression. We consider three independent combinations of datasets, namely CC32+DESI DR2+Pantheon+, CC32+DESI DR2+Union3, and CC32+DESI DR2+DES Y5, allowing us to assess the impact of different supernova samples on the reconstruction. From the reconstructed Hubble parameter and its derivatives over the redshift range 0 to 2, we evaluate key thermodynamic quantities associated with the apparent horizon, including the diagnostic function $P(z)$, the entropy production rate $\dot{S}_{\mathrm{tot}}$, and its second derivative $\ddot{S}_{\mathrm{tot}}$. We find that $P(z)$ remains positive across all redshifts, ensuring the validity of the generalized second law of thermodynamics. Correspondingly, $\dot{S}_{\mathrm{tot}} > 0$ throughout, while $\ddot{S}_{\mathrm{tot}} < 0$ at low redshifts, indicating that the Universe evolves toward stable thermodynamic equilibrium. To assess methodological robustness, the reconstruction is performed using multiple covariance kernels, including the Squared Exponential and Mat\'ern kernels with $\nu = 5/2, 7/2,$ and $9/2$, all of which yield consistent results within uncertainties. We also reconstruct the dark energy equation of state in a fully model-independent manner and find it to be consistent with a cosmological constant at the present epoch, with no statistically significant deviation from $\Lambda$CDM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper performs a model-independent reconstruction of the Hubble parameter H(z) and its first two derivatives over 0 < z < 2 using Gaussian Process regression on three combinations of cosmic chronometer (CC32), DESI DR2, and supernova (Pantheon+, Union3, DES Y5) datasets. From these reconstructions it computes the thermodynamic diagnostic P(z) for the apparent horizon, the total entropy production rate dot S_tot, and its second derivative ddot S_tot, reporting that P(z) > 0 everywhere, dot S_tot > 0 at all redshifts, and ddot S_tot < 0 at low redshifts. It additionally reconstructs the dark-energy equation-of-state parameter w(z) and finds it consistent with a cosmological constant at z = 0. Robustness is tested by repeating the analysis with four covariance kernels (Squared Exponential and Matern nu = 5/2, 7/2, 9/2).

Significance. If the reported signs of P(z), dot S_tot and ddot S_tot survive a more explicit treatment of derivative-error propagation, the work supplies direct, data-driven evidence that the generalized second law holds and that the Universe is approaching thermodynamic equilibrium, without assuming any specific dark-energy or modified-gravity model. The multi-dataset, multi-kernel consistency and the model-independent w(z) reconstruction are genuine strengths that would be of interest to both cosmologists and thermodynamic-gravity researchers.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods / Gaussian Process reconstruction] Methods section on Gaussian Process reconstruction: the propagation of uncertainties from the reconstructed H(z) and its first derivative into the second derivative of total entropy (ddot S_tot) is not described. Because ddot S_tot involves second derivatives of H(z), an explicit statement of the error-propagation procedure (analytic covariance or Monte-Carlo sampling) is required to substantiate the claim that ddot S_tot < 0 at low redshifts.
  2. [Data and reconstruction procedure] Section describing the combined datasets: the construction of the joint covariance matrix for CC32 + DESI DR2 + supernova data and the choice of redshift binning are not specified. These choices directly affect the stability of the higher-order derivatives used for the thermodynamic diagnostics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract should briefly state how the covariance matrix for the combined probes is assembled and how derivative uncertainties are propagated; this information is currently absent and would improve readability.
  2. [Thermodynamic quantities] Notation for the diagnostic function P(z) and the entropy rates should be defined once in the main text before being used in figures and results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / Gaussian Process reconstruction] Methods section on Gaussian Process reconstruction: the propagation of uncertainties from the reconstructed H(z) and its first derivative into the second derivative of total entropy (ddot S_tot) is not described. Because ddot S_tot involves second derivatives of H(z), an explicit statement of the error-propagation procedure (analytic covariance or Monte-Carlo sampling) is required to substantiate the claim that ddot S_tot < 0 at low redshifts.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit description of the uncertainty propagation for ddot S_tot is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section explaining that uncertainties are obtained by Monte Carlo sampling of 5000 realizations drawn from the full multivariate Gaussian posterior of the Gaussian Process, which automatically incorporates the covariances among H(z), H'(z) and H''(z). This procedure confirms that ddot S_tot remains negative at low redshifts within the reported 1-sigma uncertainties for all kernels and dataset combinations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Data and reconstruction procedure] Section describing the combined datasets: the construction of the joint covariance matrix for CC32 + DESI DR2 + supernova data and the choice of redshift binning are not specified. These choices directly affect the stability of the higher-order derivatives used for the thermodynamic diagnostics.

    Authors: We will revise the manuscript to provide a complete description of the joint covariance matrix and redshift handling. The total covariance is assembled as a block-diagonal matrix by concatenating the individual covariance matrices of CC32, DESI DR2 and the supernova sample under the assumption of statistical independence between probes. We will also state that the Gaussian Process is fitted directly to the unbinned data points; any redshift binning is applied only for post-processing visualization and does not enter the derivative calculations or thermodynamic diagnostics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's central procedure reconstructs H(z) and its first two derivatives via Gaussian Process regression applied directly to external observational datasets (CC32 cosmic chronometers, DESI DR2 BAO, and three independent supernova compilations). Thermodynamic diagnostics P(z), dot S_tot, and ddot S_tot are then obtained by substituting these reconstructed functions into the standard apparent-horizon thermodynamic identities; the identities themselves are not altered or fitted to the target quantities. Because the GP inputs are independent data and the kernels are fixed standard choices (Squared Exponential, Matern nu=5/2,7/2,9/2) rather than being optimized against the thermodynamic outputs, no step reduces to a self-definition or to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work appears in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of Gaussian Process regression for derivative reconstruction and on the standard thermodynamic definitions for the apparent horizon; no new physical entities are introduced and no parameters are fitted beyond the GP hyperparameters.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gaussian Process regression with the listed kernels can recover the true Hubble parameter and its first two derivatives from discrete, noisy cosmological data without model bias
    Invoked to justify computing thermodynamic quantities from the reconstructed H(z) and derivatives
  • standard math The apparent horizon entropy and its time derivatives are correctly given by the standard expressions involving H and its derivatives
    Used to define P(z), dot S_tot and ddot S_tot

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5579 in / 1589 out tokens · 33375 ms · 2026-05-10T03:15:02.075966+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exponential Quintessence: Analytic Relationship Between the Current Equation of State Parameter and the Potential Parameter

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    For an exponential quintessence potential, an analytic formula links the current equation-of-state w_φ0 to the potential slope λ while enforcing prior radiation and matter domination, yielding the bound λ < 1.94 at Ω_...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high redshift supernovae, Astrophys

    S. Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565–

    1999

  2. [2]

    arXiv:astro-ph/9812133, doi:10.1086/307221

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/307221

  3. [3]

    A. G. Riess, et al., Observational evidence from su- pernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmologi- cal constant, Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009–1038. arXiv: astro-ph/9805201, doi:10.1086/300499

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/300499 1998

  4. [4]

    D. M. Scolnic, et al., The Complete Light-curve Sam- ple of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan- STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Com- bined Pantheon Sample, Astrophys. J. 859 (2) (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    arXiv:1710.00845, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ aab9bb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/

  6. [6]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Brout, et al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-Curve Release, Astrophys. J. 938 (2) (2022) 110. arXiv:2202.04077, doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac8e04

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    T. M. C. Abbott, et al., The Dark Energy Survey: Cos- mology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set, Astrophys. J. Lett. 973 (1) (2024) L14. arXiv:2401.02929, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f 2024

  8. [8]

    Rubinet al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys

    D. Rubin, et al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys. J. 986 (2) (2025) 231. arXiv:2311.12098, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a5 2025

  9. [9]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmo- logical parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A16. arXiv:1303.5076, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 2013

  10. [10]

    Planck 2018 Results

    N. Aghanim, et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]. arXiv:1807.06209, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018

  11. [11]

    Lodha, et al., DESI 2024: Constraints on physics- focused aspects of dark energy using DESI DR1 BAO data, Phys

    K. Lodha, et al., DESI 2024: Constraints on physics- focused aspects of dark energy using DESI DR1 BAO data, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2) (2025) 023532. arXiv:2405. 13588, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023532

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.023532 2024

  12. [12]

    A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Per- cival, A. Burden, M. Manera, The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per 10 cent distance measure at z = 0.15 , Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (1) (2015) 835–847. arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/ mnras/article-pdf/449/1/835/13767551/stv154.pdf, doi:10.1093/mnras/stv...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv154 2015

  13. [13]

    P. Zarrouk, et al., The clustering of the SDSS-IV ex- tended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample: measurement of the growth rate of struc- ture from the anisotropic correlation function between redshift 0.8 and 2.2, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 477 (2) (2018) 1639–1663. arXiv:1801.03062, doi:10.1093/ mnras/sty506

    work page arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    S. A. et al., The clustering of galaxies in the com- pleted SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Sur- vey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, mnras 470 (3) (2017) 2617–2652. arXiv:1607.03155, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 2017

  15. [15]

    et al., Baryon acoustic oscillations from the complete SDSS-III Ly α-quasar cross-correlation function at z = 2.4, aap 608 (2017) A130

    d. et al., Baryon acoustic oscillations from the complete SDSS-III Ly α-quasar cross-correlation function at z = 2.4, aap 608 (2017) A130. arXiv:1708.02225, doi:10. 1051/0004-6361/201731731

    work page arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 VI: cosmological con- straints from the measurements of baryon acoustic os- cillations, JCAP 02 (2025) 021. arXiv:2404.03002, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 2024

  17. [17]

    A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars, JCAP 04 (2025)

    2024

  18. [19]

    A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 IV: Baryon Acoustic Os- cillations from the Lyman alpha forest, JCAP 01 (2025)

    2024

  19. [20]

    arXiv:2404.03001, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/ 01/124

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/ 2025

  20. [21]

    Calderon, et al., DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data, JCAP 10 (2024) 048

    R. Calderon, et al., DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossing statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data, JCAP 10 (2024) 048. arXiv:2405.04216, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/048

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/048 2024

  21. [22]

    Abdul Karimet al.[DESI], Phys

    M. Abdul Karim, et al., DESI DR2 results. II. Mea- surements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmolog- ical constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112 (8) (2025) 083515. arXiv:2503.14738, doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6

    work page doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 2025

  22. [23]

    A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, J. B. Bowers, L. Macri, J. C. Zinn, D. Scolnic, Cosmic Distances Cal- ibrated to 1% Precision with Gaia EDR3 Parallaxes and Hubble Space Telescope Photometry of 75 Milky Way Cepheids Confirm Tension with ΛCDM, Astro- phys. J. Lett. 908 (1) (2021) L6. arXiv:2012.08534, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdbaf

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdbaf 2021

  23. [24]

    A. G. Riess, et al., A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s −1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934 (1) (2022) L7. arXiv:2112.04510, doi:10.3847/2041-$8213/ac5c5b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041- 2022

  24. [25]

    G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Macri, L

    L. Breuval, A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, M. Romaniello, Y. S. Murakami, D. Scolnic, G. S. Anand, I. Soszyński, Small Magellanic Cloud Cepheids Observed with the Hubble Space Telescope Provide a New Anchor for the SH0ES Distance Ladder, Astro- phys. J. 973 (1) (2024) 30. arXiv:2404.08038, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad630e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad630e 2024

  25. [26]

    Z. C. et al, Four new observational h(z) data from lu- minous red galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey data release seven , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics. 14 (10) (2014) 1221. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/14/10/ 002. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/14/10/002

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/14/10/ 2014

  26. [27]

    Cosmic Chronometers: Constraining the Equation of State of Dark Energy. I: H(z) Measurements

    D. Stern, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, M. Kamionkowski, S. A. Stanford, Cosmic chronometers: constraining the equa- tion of state of dark energy. I: H(z) measurements, JCAP 02 (2010) 008. arXiv:0907.3149, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2010/02/008

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  27. [28]

    Moresco, A

    M. Moresco, A. Cimatti, R. Jimenez, L. Pozzetti, G. Zamorani, et al., Improved constraints on the expan- sion rate of the Universe up to z ∼ 1.1 from the spectro- scopic evolution of cosmic chronometers, JCAP 08 (2012)

    2012

  28. [29]

    arXiv:1201.3609, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/ 08/006

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/ 2012

  29. [30]

    Moresco, L

    M. Moresco, L. Pozzetti, A. Cimatti, R. Jimenez, C. Maraston, L. Verde, D. Thomas, A. Citro, R. Tojeiro, D. Wilkinson, A 6% measurement of the Hubble param- eter at z ∼ 0.45: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration, JCAP 05 (2016) 014. arXiv:1601.01701, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014 2016

  30. [31]

    A. L. Ratsimbazafy, S. I. Loubser, S. M. Crawford, C. M. Cress, B. A. Bassett, R. C. Nichol, P. Väisänen, Age- dating luminous red galaxies observed with the southern african large telescope, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society 467 (3) (2017) 3239–3254

    2017

  31. [32]

    M. Moresco, Raising the bar: new constraints on the hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at z ∼ 2, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Let- ters 450 (1) (2015) L16–L20

    2015

  32. [33]

    Moresco, R

    M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, A. Cimatti, L. Pozzetti, Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronome- ters. II. Impact of Stellar Population Synthesis Models Systematics and Full Covariance Matrix, Astrophys. J. 898 (1) (2020) 82. arXiv:2003.07362, doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/ab9eb0

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [34]

    Moresco, Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers (12 2024)

    M. Moresco, Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers (12 2024). arXiv: 2412.01994

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [35]

    2022, Living Reviews in Relativity, 25, 6, doi: 10.1007/s41114-022-00040-z

    M. Moresco, et al., Unveiling the Universe with emerging cosmological probes, Living Rev. Rel. 25 (1) (2022) 6. arXiv:2201.07241, doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00040-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00040-z 2022

  35. [36]

    C. E. Rasmussen, C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, Adaptive Computation and Ma- chine Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005

    2005

  36. [37]

    Nonparametric Dark Energy Reconstruction from Supernova Data

    T. Holsclaw, U. Alam, B. Sanso, H. Lee, K. Heitmann, S. Habib, D. Higdon, Nonparametric Dark Energy Re- construction from Supernova Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 241302. arXiv:1011.3079, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.105.241302

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  37. [38]

    Nonparametric Reconstruction of the Dark Energy Equation of State

    T. Holsclaw, U. Alam, B. Sanso, H. Lee, K. Heit- mann, S. Habib, D. Higdon, Nonparametric Reconstruc- tion of the Dark Energy Equation of State, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 103502. arXiv:1009.5443, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.82.103502

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  38. [39]

    Holsclaw, U

    T. Holsclaw, U. Alam, B. Sanso, H. Lee, K. Heitmann, S. Habib, D. Higdon, Nonparametric Reconstruction of the Dark Energy Equation of State from Diverse Data Sets, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 083501. arXiv:1104.2041, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.083501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.083501 2011

  39. [40]

    V. C. Busti, C. Clarkson, M. Seikel, The Value of H0 from Gaussian Processes, IAU Symp. 306 (2014) 25–27. arXiv:1407.5227, doi:10.1017/S1743921314013751

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921314013751 2014

  40. [41]

    V. C. Busti, C. Clarkson, M. Seikel, Evidence for a Lower Value for H0 from Cosmic Chronometers Data?, Mon. 11 Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 441 (2014) 11. arXiv:1402.5429, doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu035

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu035 2014

  41. [42]

    Seikel, C

    M. Seikel, C. Clarkson, M. Smith, Reconstruction of dark energy and expansion dynamics using Gaussian pro- cesses, JCAP 06 (2012) 036. arXiv:1204.2832, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/06/036

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/06/036 2012

  42. [43]

    Seikel, S

    M. Seikel, S. Yahya, R. Maartens, C. Clarkson, Using H(z) data as a probe of the concordance model, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083001. arXiv:1205.3431, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.86.083001

    work page arXiv 2012

  43. [44]

    Optimising Gaussian processes for reconstructing dark energy dynamics from supernovae

    M. Seikel, C. Clarkson, Optimising Gaussian processes for reconstructing dark energy dynamics from supernovae (11 2013). arXiv:1311.6678

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  44. [45]

    Shafieloo, A

    A. Shafieloo, A. G. Kim, E. V. Linder, Gaussian Process Cosmography, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 123530. arXiv: 1204.2272, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.123530

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.123530 2012

  45. [46]

    Mukherjee, J

    P. Mukherjee, J. Levi Said, J. Mifsud, Neural network reconstruction of H’(z) and its application in teleparallel gravity, JCAP 12 (2022) 029. arXiv:2209.01113, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/12/029

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/12/029 2022

  46. [47]

    Mukherjee, Non-parametric Reconstruction Of Some Cosmological Parameters, Ph.D

    P. Mukherjee, Non-parametric Reconstruction Of Some Cosmological Parameters, Ph.D. thesis, IISER, Kolkata (2022). arXiv:2207.07857

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [48]

    Mukherjee, N

    P. Mukherjee, N. Banerjee, Revisiting a non-parametric reconstruction of the deceleration parameter from com- bined background and the growth rate data, Phys. Dark Univ. 36 (2022) 100998. arXiv:2007.15941, doi:10. 1016/j.dark.2022.100998

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [49]

    Mukherjee, A

    Ruchika, P. Mukherjee, A. Favale, Revisiting Gaussian Process Reconstruction for Cosmological Inference: The Generalised GP (Gen GP) Framework (10 2025). arXiv: 2510.03742

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [50]

    J. d. J. Velázquez, L. A. Escamilla, P. Mukherjee, J. A. Vázquez, Non-Parametric Reconstruction of Cosmolog- ical Observables Using Gaussian Processes Regression, Universe 10 (12) (2024) 464. arXiv:2410.02061, doi: 10.3390/universe10120464

    work page doi:10.3390/universe10120464 2024

  50. [51]

    Mukherjee, A

    P. Mukherjee, A. A. Sen, Model-independent cosmologi- cal inference post DESI DR1 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D 110 (12) (2024) 123502. arXiv:2405.19178, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.123502 2024

  51. [52]

    , author G\'omez-Valent, A

    A. Favale, A. Gómez-Valent, M. Migliaccio, Cosmic chronometers to calibrate the ladders and measure the curvature of the Universe. A model-independent study, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 523 (3) (2023) 3406–3422. arXiv:2301.09591, doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1621

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1621 2023

  52. [53]

    Jiang, K

    J.-y. Jiang, K. Jiao, T.-J. Zhang, Optimizing gaussian process kernels using nested sampling and ABC rejection for H(z) reconstruction, JCAP 11 (2025) 065. arXiv: 2506.21238, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/065

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/065 2025

  53. [54]

    Favale, A

    A. Favale, A. Gómez-Valent, M. Migliaccio, Revisiting model-independent constraints on spatial curvature and cosmic ladders calibration: updated and forecast analy- ses (11 2025). arXiv:2511.19332

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    , author Pedrotti, D

    J.-Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, S. Vagnozzi, Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruc- tion and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data, Phys. Rev. D 110 (12) (2024) 123519. arXiv:2408.02365, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123519

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.123519 2024

  55. [56]

    J. P. Johnson, H. K. Jassal, Kernel dependence of the Gaussian process reconstruction of late Universe expan- sion history, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (9) (2025) 996. arXiv: 2503.04273, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14732-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14732-7 2025

  56. [57]

    A. N. Ormondroyd, W. J. Handley, M. P. Hobson, A. N. Lasenby, Non-parametric reconstructions of dy- namical dark energy via flexknots, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc. 541 (4) (2025) 3388–3400. arXiv:2503.08658, doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1144

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1144 2025

  57. [58]

    Sangwan, A

    A. Sangwan, A. Mukherjee, H. K. Jassal, Reconstructing the dark energy potential, JCAP 01 (2018) 018. arXiv: 1712.05143, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/01/018

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/01/018 2018

  58. [59]

    J.-X. Li, S. Wang, Reconstructing dark energy with model independent methods after DESI DR2, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (11) (2025) 1308. arXiv:2506.22953, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15065-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15065-1 2025

  59. [60]

    Ling, G.-H

    J.-L. Ling, G.-H. Du, T.-N. Li, J.-F. Zhang, S.-J. Wang, X. Zhang, Model-independent cosmological inference af- ter the DESI DR2 data with improved inverse distance ladder, Phys. Rev. D 112 (8) (2025) 083528. arXiv: 2505.22369, doi:10.1103/p8nz-djjm

    work page doi:10.1103/p8nz-djjm 2025

  60. [61]

    A. Maqsood, Derivative Hierarchy as the Origin of Kernel-Dependent Trends in Gaussian Process Re- constructions of the Hubble Parameter, Physics Let- ters B (2026) 140456 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2026.140456

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2026

  61. [62]

    Berti, E

    M. Berti, E. Bellini, C. Bonvin, M. Kunz, M. Viel, M. Zumalacarregui, Reconstructing the dark energy den- sity in light of DESI BAO observations, Phys. Rev. D 112 (2) (2025) 023518. arXiv:2503.13198, doi:10.1103/ dj3k-84v4

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [63]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

    D. Scolnic, et al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J. 938 (2) (2022) 113. arXiv:2112.03863, doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac8b7a

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  63. [64]

    Adhikary, S

    P. Adhikary, S. Das, S. D. Odintsov, T. Paul, Dark energy era with a resolution of Hubble tension in generalized entropic cosmology, Phys. Dark Univ. 49 (2025) 102037. arXiv:2507.15273, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102037

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102037 2025

  64. [65]

    Juárez-Jiménez, A

    J. Juárez-Jiménez, A. A. A vilez-López, M. Cruz, Ther- modynamics of an universe with decaying cold dark mat- ter, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (7) (2025) 734. arXiv:2507. 03143, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14465-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14465-7 2025

  65. [66]

    D. P. Knobles, M. F. Westling, Maximum Entropy Es- timates of Hubble Constant from Planck Measurements, Entropy 27 (7) (2025) 760. doi:10.3390/e27070760

    work page doi:10.3390/e27070760 2025

  66. [67]

    P. K. Dhankar, A. Sanyal, S. Islam, F. Rahaman, B. Pourhassan, Testing the Generalized Second Law in (2 + 1) -Dimensional Cosmology: Holographic Entropy Bounds and Observational Constraints (8 2025). arXiv: 2508.13227

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [68]

    Anwar, N

    U. Anwar, N. Azhar, A. Jawad, N. Myrzakulov, S. Shay- matov, O. Razina, P. Tsyba, Cosmic and thermodynamic aspects of f (R, A) gravity, Commun. Theor. Phys. 78 (3) (2026) 035401. doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ae11fc

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ae11fc 2026

  68. [69]

    Komatsu, Dissipative cosmology with Λ from the first law of thermodynamics (12 2025)

    N. Komatsu, Dissipative cosmology with Λ from the first law of thermodynamics (12 2025). arXiv:2512.19911

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [70]

    V. H. Cárdenas, M. Cruz, S. Lepe, Beyond Comoving Volume: Horizon Flux and Matter Creation in Entropic Cosmology (1 2026). arXiv:2601.20839

    work page arXiv 2026

  70. [71]

    C.-H. Wu, Y. C. Ong, Cosmology with Logarithmic Corrected Horizon Entropy According to the General- ized Entropy and Variable-G Correspondence (3 2026). arXiv:2603.23551

    work page arXiv 2026

  71. [72]

    S. Ali, T. Denkiewicz, Growth of Cosmic Structures in generalized mass-to-horizon relation Entropic Cosmology (7 2025). arXiv:2507.08647. 12

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [73]

    G. G. Luciano, E. N. Saridakis, New modified cosmology from a new generalized entropy (2 2026). arXiv:2602. 20004

    2026

  73. [74]

    Mukherjee, H

    D. Mukherjee, H. S. Sahota, S. Gavas, A dynamical sys- tems perspective on the thermodynamics of late-time cosmology (9 2025). arXiv:2509.04964, doi:10.1002/ prop.70094

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [75]

    Corichi, O

    A. Corichi, O. Gallegos, Entropy in Loop Quantum Cos- mology (5 2025). arXiv:2505.09055

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [76]

    U. K. Tyagi, S. Haridasu, S. Basak, Constraints on gen- eralized gravity-thermodynamic cosmology from DESI DR2, Phys. Rev. D 113 (6) (2026) 063507. arXiv: 2504.11308, doi:10.1103/7jkz-l38r

    work page doi:10.1103/7jkz-l38r 2026

  76. [77]

    Bak, S.-J

    D. Bak, S.-J. Rey, Cosmic holography, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) L83. arXiv:hep-th/9902173, doi:10. 1088/0264-9381/17/15/101

    work page arXiv 2000

  77. [78]

    P. C. Ferreira, D. Pavon, Thermodynamics of non- singular bouncing universes, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (1) (2016) 37. arXiv:1509.03725, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-016-3886-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2016

  78. [79]

    Faraoni,Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Horizons, vol

    V. Faraoni, Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Hori- zons, Vol. 907, 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19240-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19240-6 2015

  79. [80]

    R.-G. Cai, S. P. Kim, First law of thermodynamics and Friedmann equations of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker universe, JHEP 02 (2005) 050. arXiv:hep-th/0501055, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/050

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/050 2005

  80. [81]

    S. A. Hayward, Unified first law of black hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics, Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 3147–3162. arXiv:gr-qc/9710089, doi:10.1088/ 0264-9381/15/10/017

    work page arXiv 1998

Showing first 80 references.