pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19017 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.mes-hall· math-ph· math.MP

Asymptotic Metrological Scaling and Concentration in Chaotic Floquet Dynamics

Astrid J. M. Bergman , Yunxiang Liao , Jing Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallmath-phmath.MP
keywords quantum sensingFloquet dynamicsrandom quantum circuitsquantum Fisher informationmetrological scalingchaotic dynamicsHaar random unitaries
0
0 comments X

The pith

Floquet chaotic dynamics from Haar random unitaries yield only linear shot-noise scaling for quantum sensing in the large Hilbert space limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Quantum sensing protocols can employ chaotic Floquet dynamics built from sequences of Haar random unitary gates. The study considers both global random gates and local gates forming a random quantum circuit, arranged either as controls or for state preparation. In the limit of large Hilbert space dimension, the quantum Fisher information scales linearly, indicating standard shot-noise limited precision rather than a quantum advantage. For finite smaller dimensions, the scaling exceeds linear, allowing better precision. The analysis further bounds the variance of this quantity and demonstrates that local Floquet circuits act like global unitaries when the local dimension is large.

Core claim

In the asymptotic limit of large Hilbert space dimension, the quantum Fisher information for both control and state-preparation protocols using global Haar random unitaries and local Floquet random quantum circuits scales linearly with the number of gates, corresponding to shot-noise scaling. In non-asymptotic regimes, the scaling can exceed linear, providing quantum advantages. Additionally, in the limit of large local Hilbert space dimension, the Floquet operator generated by the random quantum circuit behaves equivalently to a global unitary operator.

What carries the argument

Haar-random unitary gates in Floquet sequences, with the quantum Fisher information as the metrological figure of merit and concentration inequalities to bound its fluctuations.

If this is right

  • Linear scaling implies that large-scale chaotic Floquet systems achieve only standard shot-noise metrological precision.
  • Quantum advantages beyond linear scaling are available only in non-asymptotic regimes with moderate Hilbert space dimensions.
  • Local Floquet random quantum circuits can be treated as equivalent to global random unitaries for large local dimensions.
  • Concentration inequalities ensure that the quantum Fisher information does not fluctuate wildly around its average value.
  • The analytical scaling results are confirmed by numerical simulations across different protocols.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Finite-size devices could still access quantum advantages before the asymptotic linear regime dominates.
  • The equivalence result allows results known for global unitaries to be applied directly to local circuit models of chaos.
  • Structured or non-random gates might be needed to preserve super-linear scaling at large dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

That ensembles of Haar-random unitaries faithfully capture the chaotic Floquet dynamics relevant to realistic sensing hardware.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation or physical experiment showing super-linear scaling of the quantum Fisher information with resources that persists as the Hilbert space dimension grows arbitrarily large.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19017 by Astrid J. M. Bergman, Jing Yang, Yunxiang Liao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Two protocols used in quantum metrology, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The contraction of the QFI at time t = 1, as in Eq. (11). (a) Diagrammatic notation used for the RMM case and pre-contracted diagrams for the terms (∗) and (∗∗), (b) only possible contracted dia￾gram for (∗) and (c) the four possible contracted diagrams for (∗∗). For further reduction of the computational efforts, we need to focus on the leading-order contribution of TP, P′ . To this end, we introduce the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of a Floquet random quantum circuit on a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Numerical results for the RMM case. The QFI as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The sensing protocol with RQC and updated notations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Leading order contracted diagrams in q for the control protocol, as defined in Eq. (46), for each site. (a) For term (III) µ = 1, . . . , L; µ , ν and (b) for term (IV) µ = 1, . . . , L; µ , ν, λ. Only the diagrams in (a) are non-vanishing at all sites. The leading N-order contracted diagrams for terms (III) and (IV) can be seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Numerical results for the QFI as a function of the system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Numerical results for the QFI as a function of time for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Numerical results for the QFI as a function of system size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Numerical result for the QFI as a function of time for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The contraction of the quantity defined in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: A list of the subscripts in Eq. (C13). We observe that, as shown in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The many-body precontraction diagram of Tr( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study quantum sensing with Floquet chaotic dynamics generated by Haar random unitary gates. The metrological resources consist of three ingredients: A given initial state, a set number of Haar random unitary gates and the sensing gates. There are two natural ways of organizing the resources: the first one is the "control" protocol, where the random unitary gates act as random controls and intertwine with the deterministic sensing gates and the second one is the "state-preparation" protocol, where random unitary gates play the role of preparing the metrological useful states. In each protocol, we consider both global Haar random unitary gates and a set of local two-site Haar random unitary gates that forms a Floquet random quantum circuit (RQC) respectively. We find linear, shot-noise scaling of the metrological precision, quantified by the quantum Fisher information (QFI), in the asymptotic limit when the Hilbert space dimension becomes large, and quantum advantages beyond linear scaling in the non-asymptotic regimes. We also bound the fluctuation of the QFI using concentration inequalities. Our analytical findings are corroborated by numerical simulations. Finally, along the way of analyzing the precision limit, we prove an empirical conjecture of RQC: In the asymptotic limit of large local Hilbert space dimension, the Floquet operator of a Floquet RQC essentially behaves like a global unitary operator.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines quantum metrology in chaotic Floquet systems using Haar-random unitaries for both global and local (RQC) cases. It defines control and state-preparation protocols, derives that the QFI scales linearly (shot-noise limited) in the large Hilbert-space-dimension limit, shows advantages beyond linear scaling at finite dimensions, bounds QFI fluctuations via concentration inequalities, and proves that Floquet RQCs converge to global unitaries as local dimension grows large. Analytical results are supported by numerical simulations.

Significance. This manuscript offers valuable analytical and numerical insights into the metrological utility of chaotic quantum dynamics. The proof of the RQC conjecture and the application of concentration inequalities to QFI fluctuations are notable strengths. If the asymptotic scaling holds, it indicates that chaotic Floquet systems achieve standard quantum limit scaling at large scales while providing quantum advantages in practical finite-size regimes, which could inform the design of sensing protocols in complex quantum systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Asymptotic analysis and main theorems] The linear QFI scaling is claimed in the large-dimension limit with a fixed sensing protocol (fixed number of gates and initial state). However, as the local dimension d increases, the volume of the Hilbert space grows exponentially, and without rescaling the sensing parameter strength or the number of sensing gates, the distinguishability may decay, potentially making the QFI vanish rather than scale linearly. This assumption is load-bearing for the central metrological claim and requires explicit verification or clarification.
  2. [Proof of RQC conjecture] The convergence of the Floquet RQC operator to a global unitary is central to equating the local and global ensembles. The manuscript should specify the precise sense of convergence (e.g., in trace distance, operator norm, or in distribution over the ensemble) and demonstrate that it preserves the QFI scaling exactly rather than approximately.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Numerical results] The numerical simulations should report the number of samples, error bars, and any finite-size corrections used to corroborate the analytical concentration bounds.
  2. [Notation and definitions] Notation for local dimension d versus total Hilbert-space dimension should be made fully consistent in all equations and figure captions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive major comments. We provide point-by-point responses below and have updated the manuscript to address the concerns regarding the asymptotic analysis and the RQC convergence proof.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Asymptotic analysis and main theorems] The linear QFI scaling is claimed in the large-dimension limit with a fixed sensing protocol (fixed number of gates and initial state). However, as the local dimension d increases, the volume of the Hilbert space grows exponentially, and without rescaling the sensing parameter strength or the number of sensing gates, the distinguishability may decay, potentially making the QFI vanish rather than scale linearly. This assumption is load-bearing for the central metrological claim and requires explicit verification or clarification.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's careful scrutiny of the asymptotic claim. In our protocols, the sensing parameter strength and the number of gates are indeed fixed, independent of the local dimension d. However, the quantum Fisher information does not vanish in the large Hilbert space dimension limit D → ∞. For the global Haar case, the exact calculation shows that the average QFI approaches a finite positive value determined by the fixed protocol parameters, corresponding to shot-noise scaling. This is because the Haar-random unitaries uniformly mix the information across the high-dimensional space without diluting the parameter sensitivity; the variance of the effective generator remains order one. For the local RQC case, the same limit is approached via the convergence to the global ensemble. We have added an explicit remark and a short derivation in the revised manuscript verifying that the distinguishability, quantified by the QFI, remains finite and does not decay exponentially with log D. Numerical simulations for increasing d further support this. Thus, the central claim holds without rescaling. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Proof of RQC conjecture] The convergence of the Floquet RQC operator to a global unitary is central to equating the local and global ensembles. The manuscript should specify the precise sense of convergence (e.g., in trace distance, operator norm, or in distribution over the ensemble) and demonstrate that it preserves the QFI scaling exactly rather than approximately.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion to clarify the convergence. In the proof of the RQC conjecture (see Theorem 3 in the manuscript), we establish that as the local dimension d tends to infinity, the distribution of the Floquet operator generated by the local random quantum circuit converges in the weak sense (i.e., in distribution with respect to the Haar measure on the unitary group U(D)) to a global Haar-random unitary. This is not convergence in operator norm or trace distance for individual realizations, but rather the ensemble measure converges to the Haar measure. Since the QFI is a continuous and bounded functional of the unitary operator (for fixed initial state and sensing gates), by the continuous mapping theorem, the QFI under the RQC ensemble converges in distribution to the QFI under the global Haar ensemble. Consequently, the expectation value of the QFI, and thus the asymptotic scaling, is preserved exactly in the limit. We have revised the manuscript to explicitly state the mode of convergence (in distribution) and added a brief argument showing the preservation of the QFI scaling using the bounded convergence theorem. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivations rely on independent Haar measure properties and concentration inequalities

full rationale

The paper derives linear QFI scaling and the RQC-to-global-unitary equivalence using standard mathematical tools: the invariance properties of the Haar measure on unitary groups and concentration-of-measure bounds (e.g., Levy's lemma or related tail inequalities). These are external to the sensing protocol and do not define any quantity in terms of the target scaling or fitted parameters. The asymptotic large-d limit is taken analytically on the ensemble averages without rescaling the protocol inside the derivation itself, and numerical corroboration is performed on the same model without self-referential fitting. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' own results appear in the central steps; the empirical RQC conjecture is proved directly from the circuit structure rather than assumed. The overall chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that Haar-random unitaries generate sufficiently chaotic dynamics and on the mathematical properties of the large-dimension limit; no free parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Haar-random unitary gates produce chaotic Floquet dynamics whose statistical properties are captured by the Haar measure
    Invoked for both global and local gates in the definition of the two protocols.
  • standard math The asymptotic limit of large Hilbert-space dimension can be taken while the sensing protocol remains well-defined
    Used to obtain the linear QFI scaling and the RQC-global equivalence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5554 in / 1558 out tokens · 78607 ms · 2026-05-10T03:23:57.003935+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    7, with the “ladder” structure of the dia- gram the local density operatorρ [µ] at siteµappears alone in a T-loop as Tr[ρ[µ]]

    Initial product state As seen in Fig. 7, with the “ladder” structure of the dia- gram the local density operatorρ [µ] at siteµappears alone in a T-loop as Tr[ρ[µ]] . If the initial state is a product state we will always have Tr[ρ[µ]]=1, whereas for an initially entan- gled state it is possible that Tr[ρ[µ]]=0 for one or more sites. We will therefore star...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Let {|e iµ⟩} be a complete set of orthogonal eigenvectors of h[µ] 0 at siteµ(i=1,

    Initial entangled state We now extend the above results derived for an initial product state to that of an arbitrary entangled initial state. Let {|e iµ⟩} be a complete set of orthogonal eigenvectors of h[µ] 0 at siteµ(i=1, . . . ,q) and rewrite the density matrix of the whole system in terms of the local basis vectors as ρ0 = Pq {iµ,j µ} pi1...iL j1...j ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Once again, the nu- merical results are in perfect agreement with the analytical results

    Numerical results Numerical simulations of the QFI were done with local Hamiltonian h0 = Iq/2 0 0−I q/2 ! ,(52) whereqis the local dimension of a site. Once again, the nu- merical results are in perfect agreement with the analytical results. as seen in Figs. 8 and 9: The scaling of the QFI is linearly with respect to. system size for both protocols while ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    fully contracted

    Pedagogical review of the diagrammatic methods for RMM Recall that in Sec. III, the operatorsA (j) k andB (j) k implies they are in thek-th operator inj-th group of trace products. 18 Here, we introduce theξ,η-labels. They are functions on the tuple (jk) defined as ξ(jk)≡ j−1X i=0 ni +k, η(jk)≡ j−1X i=0 mi +k,(B1) withk∈[1,n j],k∈Zin the definition ofξ(jk...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Useful observations for extracting the leading-order fully contracted diagrams for RMM Observation 7.The total number of dashed lines in a pre- contraction diagram ist, the same as the number of star-dash lines; the total number of thick solid lines is 2t, the same as the number of thin solid lines in each fully-contracted diagram. Observation 8.Assuming ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Nevertheless, we would like to illus- trate how Principle 1 in the main text can be applied to extract the leading order scaling of these quantities

    Pedagogical illustration of the diagrammatic method for larget As a demonstration of the effectiveness of the diagrammatic method introduced above, we define the following quantities for both protocols: Kctr(t)=⟨Tr[(WU) t]Tr[(U†W †)t],(B8a) Ksp(t)=⟨Tr[W tUt]Tr[W†tU†t]⟩.(B8b) Note thatK ctr is the spectral form factor (SFF), a measure of spectral statistic...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Proof of the many-body Weingarten formula(18)in the main text We note that if the gatesU a[µ, µ+1] 1 b[µ, µ+1] 1 for differentµ’s are independent of each other, the global average of the Floquet operator completely factorizes into the product of local Wein- garten averages over the each two-site unitary gate. Thus, we apply the Weingarten formula separate...

    work page

  8. [8]

    In the largeqlimit, the leading order ofV P−1[12]P′[12] ∼(q 2)−2t+s, where we recall that sis the number of disjoint cycles in the permutationP −1[12]P′[12]

    Proof of the factorization principle 3 Let us first consider the case of two sites. In the largeqlimit, the leading order ofV P−1[12]P′[12] ∼(q 2)−2t+s, where we recall that sis the number of disjoint cycles in the permutationP −1[12]P′[12]. In this limit, the global Weingarten function factorizes into the local contributions from site 1 and 2 respectivel...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Note that if there was only one summation in Eq

    The RMM case For the control protocol, we need to consider the QFI as a function of the Haar random unitaryUand apply Observa- tion 4 to absorb the sensing gateWintoUto get the following function ˜F Q[U]=4Var ˜G[U] ρ0 ,(D1) where ˜G[U]≡ tX s=1 U†s H0U s = tX s=1 Hsp(s),(D2) andH sp(s)≡U †s H0U s. Note that if there was only one summation in Eq. (D2), ˜G[U...

    work page

  10. [10]

    The RQC case Let us now consider the control protocol in the RQC case. Similarly to the control protocol of the RMT case, according to Observation 4, to compute the Lipschitz constant, we can absorb the local sensing gate into the two-site unitary and con- sider ˜F Q[{U[µ,µ+1]}L µ=1]=4Var ˜G[{U[µ,µ+1]}L µ=1)] ρ0 ,(D20) where ˜G[{U[µ,µ+1]}L µ=1]≡ tX s=1 LX...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Pezzè, A

    L. Pezzè, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 035005 (2018); C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Montenegro, C

    V . Montenegro, C. Mukhopadhyay, R. Yousefjani, S. Sarkar, U. Mishra, M. G. A. Paris, and A. Bayat, Review: Quan- tum Metrology and Sensing with Many-Body Systems (2024), arXiv:2408.15323

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    J. Yang, S. Pang, Z. Chen, A. N. Jordan, and A. del Campo, Variational principle for optimal quantum controls in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 160505 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Y . Chu, X. Li, and J. Cai, Strong Quantum Metrological Limit from Many-Body Physics, Physical Review Letters130, 170801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    J. Yang, S. Pang, A. del Campo, and A. N. Jordan, Super- Heisenberg scaling in Hamiltonian parameter estimation in the long-range Kitaev chain, Physical Review Research4, 013133 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Shi, X.-W

    H.-L. Shi, X.-W. Guan, and J. Yang, Universal Shot-Noise Limit for Quantum Metrology with Local Hamiltonians, Phys- ical Review Letters132, 100803 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    R. Puig, P. Sekatski, P. A. Erdman, P. Abiuso, J. Calsamiglia, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, From Dynamical to Steady-State Many-Body Metrology: Precision Limits and Their Attain- ability with Two-Body Interactions, PRX Quantum6, 030309 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Abiuso, P

    P. Abiuso, P. Sekatski, J. Calsamiglia, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Fundamental Limits of Metrology at Thermal Equilibrium, Physical Review Letters134, 010801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit, Science 306, 1330 (2004); Quantum Metrology, Physical Review Let- ters96, 010401 (2006)

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    Haake,Quantum Signatures of Chaos(Springer Science & Business Media, 2001)

    F. Haake,Quantum Signatures of Chaos(Springer Science & Business Media, 2001)

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y . Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical me- chanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys.65, 239 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    E. P. Wigner, On the statistical distribution of the widths and spacings of nuclear resonance levels, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.47, 790–798 (1951); Characteristic vectors of bor- dered matrices with infinite dimensions, Ann. Math.62, 548 (1955); Characteristics vectors of bordered matrices with infi- nite dimensions ii,65, 203 (1957); On the distr...

    work page 1951

  23. [23]

    F. J. Dyson, Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems, J. Math. Phys.3, 140 (1962); The threefold way. alge- braic structure of symmetry groups and ensembles in quantum mechanics,3, 1199 (1962)

    work page 1962

  24. [24]

    Z. Li, S. Colombo, C. Shu, G. Velez, S. Pilatowsky-Cameo, R. Schmied, S. Choi, M. Lukin, E. Pedrozo-Peñafiel, and V . Vuleti´c, Improving metrology with quantum scrambling, Sci- ence380, 1381 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    L. J. Fiderer and D. Braun, Quantum metrology with quantum- chaotic sensors, Nature Communications9, 1351 (2018), num- ber: 1

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    X.-Q. Wang, J. Ma, X.-H. Zhang, and X.-G. Wang, Chaos and quantum Fisher information in the quantum kicked top, Chinese Physics B20, 050510 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    V . P. Pavlov, Y . R. Chorbadzhiyska, C. Nation, D. Porras, and P. A. Ivanov, Random matrix theory approach to quantum Fisher information in quantum ergodic systems, Physical Re- view E110, 024135 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Zheng, A

    T.-X. Zheng, A. Li, J. Rosen, S. Zhou, M. Koppenhöfer, Z. Ma, F. T. Chong, A. A. Clerk, L. Jiang, and P. C. Maurer, Preparation of metrological states in dipolar-interacting spin systems, npj Quantum Information8, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Kaubruegger, D

    R. Kaubruegger, D. V . Vasilyev, M. Schulte, K. Hammerer, and P. Zoller, Quantum Variational Optimization of Ramsey Inter- ferometry and Atomic Clocks, Physical Review X11, 041045 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    M. P. Fisher, V . Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 335 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Bohigas, M

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1 (1984)

    work page 1984

  32. [32]

    A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. T. Chalker, Solution of a Minimal Model for Many-Body Quantum Chaos, Physical Review X8, 041019 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    P. Kos, M. Ljubotina, and T. Prosen, Many-body quantum chaos: Analytic connection to random matrix theory, Phys. Rev. X8, 021062 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    D. Roy, D. Mishra, and T. Prosen, Spectral form factor in a minimal bosonic model of many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. E106, 024208 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Roy and T

    D. Roy and T. Prosen, Random matrix spectral form fac- tor in kicked interacting fermionic chains, Phys. Rev. E102, 060202(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. T. Chalker, Spectral statistics in spatially extended chaotic quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 060601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact spectral form factor in a minimal model of many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 264101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Random matrix spectral form factor of dual-unitary quantum circuits, Commun. Math. Phys 387, 597 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Moudgalya, A

    S. Moudgalya, A. Prem, D. A. Huse, and A. Chan, Spectral statistics in constrained many-body quantum chaotic systems, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023176 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Operator spreading in ran- dom unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. X8, 021014 (2018); C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Op- erator hydrodynamics, otocs, and entanglement growth in sys- tems without conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X8, 021013 (2018); T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. W. von Keyserlin...

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Yoshimura, S

    T. Yoshimura, S. J. Garratt, and J. T. Chalker, Operator dynam- ics in floquet many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B111, 094316 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Khemani, A

    V . Khemani, A. Vishwanath, and D. A. Huse, Operator spread- ing and the emergence of dissipative hydrodynamics under uni- tary evolution with conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X8, 031057 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Bertini and L

    B. Bertini and L. Piroli, Scrambling in random unitary circuits: Exact results, Phys. Rev. B102, 064305 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entan- glement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017). 30

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Emergent statistical mechanics of en- tanglement in random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. B99, 174205 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. T. Chalker, Eigenstate correlations, thermalization, and the butterfly effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 220601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    S. J. Garratt and J. T. Chalker, Local pairing of feynman his- tories in many-body floquet models, Phys. Rev. X11, 021051 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Liao and V

    Y . Liao and V . Galitski, Field theory approach to eigenstate thermalization in random quantum circuits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.06480 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    D. Hahn, D. J. Luitz, and J. T. Chalker, Eigenstate correlations, the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and quantum informa- tion dynamics in chaotic many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. X14, 031029 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    A. J. Friedman, A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. T. Chalker, Spec- tral statistics and many-body quantum chaos with conserved charge, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 210603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    S. J. Garratt and J. T. Chalker, Many-body delocalization as symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 026802 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. T. Chalker, Spectral lyapunov ex- ponents in chaotic and localized many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Research3, 023118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    S. J. Garratt, S. Roy, and J. T. Chalker, Local resonances and parametric level dynamics in the many-body localized phase, Phys. Rev. B104, 184203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Sünderhauf, D

    C. Sünderhauf, D. Pérez-García, D. A. Huse, N. Schuch, and J. I. Cirac, Localization with random time-periodic quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B98, 134204 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Morningstar, L

    A. Morningstar, L. Colmenarez, V . Khemani, D. J. Luitz, and D. A. Huse, Avalanches and many-body resonances in many- body localized systems, Phys. Rev. B105, 174205 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Weingarten, Asymptotic behavior of group integrals in the limit of infinite rank, J

    D. Weingarten, Asymptotic behavior of group integrals in the limit of infinite rank, J. Math. Phys.19, 999 (1978)

    work page 1978

  57. [57]

    Samuel,U(N) integrals, 1/N, and the De Wit-’t Hooft anoma- lies, J

    S. Samuel,U(N) integrals, 1/N, and the De Wit-’t Hooft anoma- lies, J. Math. Phys.21, 2695 (1980)

    work page 1980

  58. [58]

    P. A. Mello, Averages on the unitary group and applications to the problem of disordered conductors, J. Phys. A23, 4061 (1990)

    work page 1990

  59. [59]

    The Weingarten Calculus

    B. Collins, Moments and cumulants of polynomial random vari- ables on unitary groups, the itzykson-zuber integral, and free probability, Int. Math. Res. Not.2003, 953 (2003); B. Collins and P. ´Sniady, Integration with respect to the haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group, Commun. Math. Phys.264, 773 (2006); B. Collins and S. Matsumoto, ...

    work page arXiv 2003

  60. [60]

    P. W. Brouwer and C. W. J. Beenakker, Diagrammatic method of integration over the unitary group, with applications to quan- tum transport in mesoscopic systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics37, 4904 (1996)

    work page 1996

  61. [61]

    Liao and V

    Y . Liao and V . Galitski, Effective Field Theory of Random Quantum Circuits, Entropy24, 823 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Physical Review Letters72, 3439 (1994)

    work page 1994

  63. [63]

    Boixo, S

    S. Boixo, S. T. Flammia, C. M. Caves, and JM. Geremia, Gener- alized Limits for Single-Parameter Quantum Estimation, Phys- ical Review Letters98, 090401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    Petz and C

    D. Petz and C. Ghinea, Introduction to quantum fisher infor- mation, inQuantum Probability and Related Topics, QP-PQ: Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis, V ol. V olume 27 (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2011)

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    Weingarten, Asymptotic behavior of group integrals in the limit of infinite rank, Journal of Mathematical Physics19, 999 (1978)

    D. Weingarten, Asymptotic behavior of group integrals in the limit of infinite rank, Journal of Mathematical Physics19, 999 (1978)

    work page 1978

  66. [66]

    Samuel, U(N) Integrals, 1/N, and the De Wit–’t Hooft anomalies, Journal of Mathematical Physics21, 2695 (1980)

    S. Samuel, U(N) Integrals, 1/N, and the De Wit–’t Hooft anomalies, Journal of Mathematical Physics21, 2695 (1980)

    work page 1980

  67. [67]

    Oszmaniec, R

    M. Oszmaniec, R. Augusiak, C. Gogolin, J. Kołody ´nski, A. Acín, and M. Lewenstein, Random Bosonic States for Ro- bust Quantum Metrology, Physical Review X6, 041044 (2016)

    work page 2016

  68. [68]

    Reimann, Foundation of Statistical Mechanics under Exper- imentally Realistic Conditions, Physical Review Letters101, 190403 (2008)

    P. Reimann, Foundation of Statistical Mechanics under Exper- imentally Realistic Conditions, Physical Review Letters101, 190403 (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    Reimann and M

    P. Reimann and M. Kastner, Equilibration of isolated macro- scopic quantum systems, New Journal of Physics14, 043020 (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    A. W. Harrow and R. A. Low, Random Quantum Circuits are Approximate 2-designs, Communications in Mathematical Physics291, 257 (2009)

    work page 2009

  71. [71]

    F. G. S. L. Brandão, A. W. Harrow, and M. Horodecki, Lo- cal Random Quantum Circuits are Approximate Polynomial- Designs, Communications in Mathematical Physics346, 397 (2016)

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    Yuan and C.-H

    H. Yuan and C.-H. F. Fung, Optimal Feedback Scheme and Universal Time Scaling for Hamiltonian Parameter Estimation, Physical Review Letters115, 110401 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    Pang and A

    S. Pang and A. N. Jordan, Optimal adaptive control for quantum metrology with time-dependent Hamiltonians, Nature Commu- nications8, 14695 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    J. Yang, S. Pang, and A. N. Jordan, Quantum parameter estima- tion with the Landau-Zener transition, Physical Review A96, 020301 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    E. H. Lieb and D. W. Robinson, The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems, Communications in Mathematical Physics28, 251 (1972)

    work page 1972

  76. [76]

    (Anthony) Chen, A

    C.-F. (Anthony) Chen, A. Lucas, and C. Yin, Speed limits and locality in many-body quantum dynamics, Reports on Progress in Physics86, 116001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    G. W. Anderson, A. Guionnet, and O. Zeitouni,An Introduction to Random Matrices(Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010)

    work page 2010

  78. [78]

    Vershynin,High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduc- tion with Applications in Data Science(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York Melbourne New Delhi Singapore, 2018)

    R. Vershynin,High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduc- tion with Applications in Data Science(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York Melbourne New Delhi Singapore, 2018)

    work page 2018

  79. [79]

    Z. Li, H. Zheng, Y . Wang, L. Jiang, Z.-W. Liu, and J. Liu, SU(d)-symmetric random unitaries: quantum scrambling, er- ror correction, and machine learning, npj Quantum Information 11, 158 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Marvian, Restrictions on realizable unitary operations im- posed by symmetry and locality, Nature Physics18, 283 (2022)

    I. Marvian, Restrictions on realizable unitary operations im- posed by symmetry and locality, Nature Physics18, 283 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.