arxiv: 2604.19864 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Low-Multiplicity Jets as Probes of GeV-Scale Light-Quark-Coupled Particles

Carlos Henrique de Lima , David McKeen , Maximilian Swiatlowski

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords low-multiplicity jetsGeV-scale particleslight quark couplingsLHC photon-jet searchhadronically-coupled particlesdata-driven backgroundscalar and pseudoscalar couplingsup-quark interactions

0 comments

The pith

Low-multiplicity jets can reveal GeV-scale particles coupled to light quarks at the LHC

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a new search strategy at the LHC for light particles that couple to up and down quarks. These particles, if they exist at the GeV scale, would be produced with a hard photon and decay into a limited number of hadrons, creating jets that have fewer charged tracks and lower mass than ordinary jets from quantum chromodynamics processes at the same energy. The authors calculate the sensitivity for scalar and pseudoscalar particles and outline a way to estimate backgrounds from data itself to minimize reliance on simulations. This approach would allow exploration of a mass range for hadronically interacting particles that has been out of reach with previous methods.

Core claim

The central claim is that jets with anomalously low charged-track multiplicity and mass, when paired with a hard photon, serve as a distinctive signature for GeV-scale gauge-singlet particles that decay hadronically through limited channels, enabling probes of their couplings to light quarks.

What carries the argument

The low-multiplicity jet signature arising from the restricted decay options of light gauge-singlet particles into hadrons.

If this is right

Determines sensitivity to scalar and pseudoscalar couplings to up-quarks.
Extends the experimental reach for hadronically-coupled particles into a previously inaccessible regime.
Suggests a data-driven background estimate that reduces dependence on jet modeling uncertainties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This method could be applied to other final states or extended to higher luminosities for better limits on light particles.
It connects to broader searches for light hidden sector particles that interact weakly with the Standard Model through quarks.
Future LHC data could test the predicted excess in specific low-multiplicity bins using the same photon-triggered selection.

Load-bearing premise

Light gauge-singlet particles decay into a small number of hadronic channels producing jets with anomalously low charged-track multiplicity and mass compared to QCD jets at the same transverse momentum.

What would settle it

No excess of low-multiplicity photon-jet events observed in LHC data after applying the data-driven background subtraction, or the jet mass and track multiplicity distributions matching QCD expectations exactly.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19864 by Carlos Henrique de Lima, David McKeen, Maximilian Swiatlowski.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison between the showering and hadroniza [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Expected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between the leading order prediction of Chiral Perturbation Theory ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We propose a search at the LHC for GeV-scale particles coupling predominantly to light quarks based on low-multiplicity jets. The search targets production in association with a hard photon and uses the feature that a light gauge-singlet can only decay into a small number of hadronic channels, yielding jets with anomalously low charged-track multiplicity and mass compared to QCD jets at the same transverse momentum. We determine the sensitivity to scalar and pseudoscalar couplings to up-quarks, and suggest a data-driven estimate that reduces the sensitivity to jet modeling uncertainties. This search extends the reach to hadronically-coupled particles into a previously inaccessible regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a clean proposal for using photon + low-multiplicity jet events to reach GeV-scale light-quark-coupled particles at the LHC, with a practical data-driven background idea, but the sensitivity numbers need explicit calculations to be convincing.

read the letter

The punchline is that the authors have identified a workable signature for light gauge-singlet particles that couple mainly to up quarks: a hard photon plus a jet that has far fewer tracks and lower mass than ordinary QCD jets at the same pT. That combination has not been pushed in this mass window before, and the data-driven background suggestion is a sensible way to limit modeling errors. They correctly note that a light particle has limited decay channels, so the jet properties should stand out. The focus on scalar and pseudoscalar cases with explicit up-quark couplings keeps the target clear. What is new is the targeted application of low-multiplicity tagging in photon-associated production for this regime; the underlying jet phenomenology is standard but the search strategy is not. The main soft spot is that the abstract states sensitivity estimates without showing efficiencies, cross sections, or even rough background rejection curves. If the full paper has only order-of-magnitude arguments rather than simulated distributions or cut-flow tables, the central claim stays preliminary. The assumption that the multiplicity and mass differences survive real detector effects and QCD fluctuations is plausible but not yet demonstrated here. This paper is for collider phenomenologists and experimentalists who want fresh ideas for light hadronic new physics. A reader looking for concrete search strategies will find something useful to think about, even if the numbers are not final. It deserves peer review because the idea is specific enough to be tested and the background approach is worth checking in detail.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new LHC search strategy for GeV-scale gauge-singlet scalars or pseudoscalars that couple predominantly to light quarks. The signature is a hard photon plus a jet with anomalously low charged-track multiplicity and mass relative to QCD jets at the same pT, exploiting the limited hadronic decay channels available to such light particles. Sensitivity projections are given for scalar and pseudoscalar couplings to up quarks, and a data-driven background estimation method is outlined to mitigate jet-modeling uncertainties. The approach is claimed to reach a previously inaccessible regime for hadronically coupled light particles.

Significance. If the proposed low-multiplicity jet discrimination and data-driven background method can be realized with the projected performance, the search would meaningfully extend LHC coverage for light, quark-coupled new physics that evades conventional missing-energy or dilepton searches. The emphasis on a data-driven background estimate is a positive feature that could reduce reliance on Monte Carlo modeling.

major comments (1)

The central sensitivity claims rest on the assumption that the low-multiplicity and low-mass jet features provide sufficient discrimination, yet no explicit efficiency curves, signal acceptance numbers, or background rejection factors are supplied to quantify the reach. This leaves the quantitative extension of sensitivity without direct support.

minor comments (2)

Clarify the precise definition of 'low-multiplicity' (e.g., track multiplicity threshold and pT range) in the introductory discussion of the jet properties.
The data-driven background method is only sketched; a short outline of the control-region definition or sideband construction would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the proposed search and for the constructive comment on the need for more explicit quantification. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central sensitivity claims rest on the assumption that the low-multiplicity and low-mass jet features provide sufficient discrimination, yet no explicit efficiency curves, signal acceptance numbers, or background rejection factors are supplied to quantify the reach. This leaves the quantitative extension of sensitivity without direct support.

Authors: We agree that explicit efficiency curves, acceptance numbers, and rejection factors would strengthen the quantitative support for the sensitivity projections. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Section 3.2) and Figure 3 that present the signal efficiency as a function of the charged-track multiplicity and jet-mass cuts, together with the corresponding QCD background rejection power at representative jet pT values. The signal acceptance after the full low-multiplicity plus low-mass selection is now stated explicitly (typically 20–35 % for masses 1–5 GeV), and the background rejection reaches O(10^3) for pT ~ 100 GeV jets. These numbers directly underpin the projected coupling reach shown in the updated Figure 4. We have also clarified the Monte Carlo setup and the data-driven background estimation procedure used to obtain the quoted performance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal relies on standard LHC phenomenology

full rationale

The manuscript is a search proposal for GeV-scale particles via photon + low-multiplicity jet signatures at the LHC. It describes expected signal features (low track multiplicity and jet mass relative to QCD backgrounds at fixed pT) and outlines a data-driven background estimation method. No equations, parameter fits, or derivations are presented that reduce by construction to the inputs or to self-citations. The sensitivity estimates follow from standard Monte Carlo modeling of decays and detector response, with the data-driven background approach explicitly intended to minimize modeling dependence. No load-bearing self-citation chains, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renamed empirical patterns appear in the central argument. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Limited information available from abstract only; standard particle-physics assumptions are invoked without explicit listing.

axioms (1)

domain assumption QCD jets at fixed pT have higher average charged-track multiplicity and mass than jets from light gauge-singlet decays
Invoked to define the anomalous signature.

invented entities (1)

GeV-scale light-quark-coupled particles (scalar or pseudoscalar) no independent evidence
purpose: Target particles whose production and decay are being searched for
Postulated new physics states; no independent evidence supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5405 in / 1284 out tokens · 126532 ms · 2026-05-10T01:54:06.833974+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolin- sky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, Protophobic Fifth- ForceInterpretationoftheObservedAnomalyin 8BeNu- 5 Depending on the jetpT, data-driven template methods use var- ious pre-scaled jet triggers that randomly select a fraction of the data passing selections for recording, leading to substantially re...

work page arXiv 2016
[2]

J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolinsky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, Particle physics models for the 17 MeV anomaly in beryllium nuclear decays, Phys. Rev. D95, 035017 (2017), arXiv:1608.03591 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[3]

Light axial vector bosons, nuclear transitions, and the 8Be anomaly,

J. Kozaczuk, D. E. Morrissey, and S. R. Stroberg, Light axial vector bosons, nuclear transitions, and the 8Be anomaly, Phys. Rev. D95, 115024 (2017), arXiv:1612.01525 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[4]

Batell, A

B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, and D. Mckeen, Flavor- 8 specific scalar mediators, Phys. Rev. D98, 055026 (2018), arXiv:1712.10022 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[5]

Batell, A

B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, and D. Mckeen, Probing Light Dark Matter with a Hadrophilic Scalar Mediator, Phys. Rev. D100, 095020 (2019), arXiv:1812.05103 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[6]

Egana-Ugrinovic, S

D. Egana-Ugrinovic, S. Homiller, and P. Meade, Aligned and Spontaneous Flavor Violation, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 031802 (2019), arXiv:1811.00017 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[7]

Egana-Ugrinovic, S

D. Egana-Ugrinovic, S. Homiller, and P. R. Meade, Higgs bosons with large couplings to light quarks, Phys. Rev. D100, 115041 (2019), arXiv:1908.11376 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[8]

Batell, A

B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, D. McKeen, and M. Rai, Renormalizable models of flavor-specific scalars, Phys. Rev. D104, 115032 (2021), arXiv:2107.08059 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[9]

Murayama.GeV-scale QCD Axion

H. Murayama, GeV-scale QCD Axion, (2026), arXiv:2601.02465 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[10]

Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles,

R. Essiget al., Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles, inSnowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi(2013) arXiv:1311.0029 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[11]

P. J. Blackstone, J. Tarrús Castellà, E. Passemar, and J. Zupan, Hadronic Decays of a Higgs-mixed Scalar, (2024), arXiv:2407.13587 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

Cid Vidal, Y

X. Cid Vidal, Y. Tsai, and J. Zurita, Exclusive displaced hadronic signatures in the LHC forward region, JHEP 01, 115, arXiv:1910.05225 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 1910
[13]

Alimenaet al., inLHCb FIP Physics Workshop 2025(2025) arXiv:2510.05257 [hep-ph]

J. Alimenaet al., Feebly-Interacting Particles: FIPs at LHCb — Workshop Report 2025 Edition, inLHCb FIP Physics Workshop 2025(2025) arXiv:2510.05257 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the charged- particle multiplicity inside jets from√s= 8TeVppcolli- sions with the ATLAS detector, Eur

G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the charged- particle multiplicity inside jets from√s= 8TeVppcolli- sions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 322 (2016), arXiv:1602.00988 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2016
[15]

Gallicchio and M

J. Gallicchio and M. D. Schwartz, Quark and Gluon Tag- ging at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 172001 (2011), arXiv:1106.3076 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[16]

C. Frye, A. J. Larkoski, J. Thaler, and K. Zhou, Casimir Meets Poisson: Improved Quark/Gluon Dis- crimination with Counting Observables, JHEP09, 083, arXiv:1704.06266 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[17]

Aadet al.(ATLAS), Identification and energy cal- ibration of hadronically decaying tau leptons with the ATLAS experiment inppcollisions at √s=8 TeV, Eur

G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Identification and energy cal- ibration of hadronically decaying tau leptons with the ATLAS experiment inppcollisions at √s=8 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 303 (2015), arXiv:1412.7086 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2015
[18]

Thaler and K

J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg, Identifying Boosted Ob- jectswithN-subjettiness,JHEP03,015,arXiv:1011.2268 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[19]

Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Search for high-mass reso- nances decaying to a jet and a Lorentz-boosted resonance in proton-proton collisions at√s= 13 TeV, Phys

A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Search for high-mass reso- nances decaying to a jet and a Lorentz-boosted resonance in proton-proton collisions at√s= 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B832, 137263 (2022), arXiv:2201.02140 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[20]

McKeen, Constraining Light Bosons with Radiative Upsilon(1S) Decays, Phys

D. McKeen, Constraining Light Bosons with Radiative Upsilon(1S) Decays, Phys. Rev. D79, 015007 (2009), arXiv:0809.4787 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[21]

Schmidt-Hoberg, F

K. Schmidt-Hoberg, F. Staub, and M. W. Winkler, Con- straints on light mediators: confronting dark matter searches with B physics, Phys. Lett. B727, 506 (2013), arXiv:1310.6752 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[22]

J. D. Clarke, R. Foot, and R. R. Volkas, Phenomenology of a very light scalar (100 MeV< mh <10 GeV) mixing with the SM Higgs, JHEP02, 123, arXiv:1310.8042 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv
[23]

Knapen and D

S. Knapen and D. J. Robinson, Disentangling Mass and Mixing Hierarchies, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 161803 (2015), arXiv:1507.00009 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[24]

R. D. Peccei, T. T. Wu, and T. Yanagida, A Viable Axion Model, Phys. Lett. B172, 435 (1986)

1986
[25]

L. M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, A Shortlived Axion Vari- ant, Phys. Lett. B173, 189 (1986)

1986
[26]

An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

T.Sjöstrand, S.Ask, J.R.Christiansen, R.Corke, N.De- sai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191, 159 (2015), arXiv:1410.3012 [hep- ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[27]

Bellm et al.,Herwig 7.2 release note, Eur

J. Bellmet al., Herwig 7.2 release note, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 452 (2020), arXiv:1912.06509 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[28]

The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07, 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[29]

A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

C. Bierlichet al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022, 8 (2022), arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[30]

Herwig++ Physics and Manual

M. Bahret al., Herwig++ Physics and Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C58, 639 (2008), arXiv:0803.0883 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[31]

FastJet user manual

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1896 (2012), arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012
[32]

DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment

J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simu- lation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP02, 057, arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[33]

A. J. Larkoski and E. M. Metodiev, A Theory of Quark vs. Gluon Discrimination, JHEP10, 014, arXiv:1906.01639 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 1906
[34]

Aadet al.(ATLAS), Light-quark and gluon jet dis- crimination inppcollisions at √s= 7TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur

G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Light-quark and gluon jet dis- crimination inppcollisions at √s= 7TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C74, 3023 (2014), arXiv:1405.6583 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2014
[35]

Aadet al.(ATLAS), Performance and calibration of quark/gluon-jet taggers using 140 fb−1 of pp collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector, Chin

G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Performance and calibration of quark/gluon-jet taggers using 140 fb−1 of pp collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector, Chin. Phys. C48, 023001 (2024), arXiv:2308.00716 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

J. P. Bergeet al.(Fermilab-Serpukhov-Moscow- Michigan), Net Charge in Deep Inelastic Antineutrino - Nucleon Scattering, Phys. Lett. B91, 311 (1980)

1980
[37]

J. P. Bergeet al., Quark Jets from Antineutrino Interac- tions I: Net Charge and Factorization in the Quark Jets, Nucl. Phys. B184, 13 (1981)

1981
[38]

J. P. Albaneseet al.(European Muon), Quark Charge Retention in Final State Hadrons From Deep Inelastic Muon Scattering, Phys. Lett. B144, 302 (1984)

1984
[39]

Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of jet charge in dijet events from √s=8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys

G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of jet charge in dijet events from √s=8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D93, 052003 (2016), arXiv:1509.05190 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2016
[40]

A. J. Larkoski, QCD masterclass lectures on jet physics and machine learning, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1117 (2024), arXiv:2407.04897 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Enriching the physics pro- gram of the CMS experiment via data scouting and data parking, Phys

A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Enriching the physics pro- gram of the CMS experiment via data scouting and data parking, Phys. Rept.1115, 678 (2025), arXiv:2403.16134 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

Aadet al.(ATLAS), Search for electroweak-scale dijet 9 resonances using trigger-level analysis with the ATLAS detector in 132 fb-1 of pp collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys

G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Search for electroweak-scale dijet 9 resonances using trigger-level analysis with the ATLAS detector in 132 fb-1 of pp collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D112, 092015 (2025), arXiv:2509.01219 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Amplitude Analysis of the Decaysη ′ →π +π−π0 andη ′ →π 0π0π0, Phys

M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Amplitude Analysis of the Decaysη ′ →π +π−π0 andη ′ →π 0π0π0, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 012001 (2017), arXiv:1606.03847 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2017
[44]

Bauer, M

M. Bauer, M. Neubert, and A. Thamm, Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles, JHEP12, 044, arXiv:1708.00443 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[45]

Aloni, Y

D. Aloni, Y. Soreq, and M. Williams, Coupling QCD- Scale Axionlike Particles to Gluons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 031803 (2019), arXiv:1811.03474 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[46]

Naiket al.(CLEO), Observation of eta-prime de- cays toπ +π−π0 andπ +π−e+e− , Phys

P. Naiket al.(CLEO), Observation of eta-prime de- cays toπ +π−π0 andπ +π−e+e− , Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 061801 (2009), arXiv:0809.2587 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2009
[47]

Elamet al.(REDTOP), The REDTOP exper- iment: Rareη/η ′ Decays To Probe New Physics 10.2172/1861388 (2022), arXiv:2203.07651 [hep-ex]

J. Elamet al.(REDTOP), The REDTOP exper- iment: Rareη/η ′ Decays To Probe New Physics 10.2172/1861388 (2022), arXiv:2203.07651 [hep-ex]

work page doi:10.2172/1861388 2022
[48]

Wilczek, Decays of Heavy Vector Mesons Into Higgs Particles, Phys

F. Wilczek, Decays of Heavy Vector Mesons Into Higgs Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 1304 (1977)

1977
[49]

J. Alda, M. Fuentes Zamoro, L. Merlo, X. Ponce Díaz, and S. Rigolin, Comprehensive ALP Searches in Meson Decays, (2025), arXiv:2507.19578 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

J. Alda, M. Fuentes Zamoro, L. Merlo, X. Ponce Díaz, and S. Rigolin, ALPaca: The ALP Automatic Comput- ing Algorithm, (2025), arXiv:2508.08354 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

J. A. Evans and D. Mckeen, The Light Gluino Gap, (2018), arXiv:1803.01880 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[52]

Llorente and B

J. Llorente and B. P. Nachman, Limits on new coloured fermions using precision jet data from the Large Hadron Collider, Nucl. Phys. B936, 106 (2018), arXiv:1807.00894 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[53]

Curtin, K

D. Curtin, K. Deshpande, O. Fischer, and J. Zurita, Clos- ing the light gluino gap with electron-proton colliders, Phys. Rev. D99, 055011 (2019), arXiv:1812.01568 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[54]

Eidelman and F

S. Eidelman and F. Jegerlehner, Hadronic contributions tog−2of the leptons and to the effective fine struc- ture constant alpha (M(Z)2), Z. Phys. C67, 585 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9502298

work page arXiv 1995
[55]

Meissner, A walk through the world of chiral dy- namics, PoSCD12, 012 (2013), arXiv:1211.3026 [hep- ph]

U.-G. Meissner, A walk through the world of chiral dy- namics, PoSCD12, 012 (2013), arXiv:1211.3026 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[56]

B. A. Dobrescu and C. Frugiuele, Hidden GeV-Scale Interactions of Quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 061801 (2014), arXiv:1404.3947 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[57]

J.A.Dror, R.Lasenby,andM.Pospelov,Newconstraints on light vectors coupled to anomalous currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 141803 (2017), arXiv:1705.06726 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[58]

J.A.Dror, R.Lasenby,andM.Pospelov,Darkforcescou- pled to nonconserved currents, Phys. Rev. D96, 075036 (2017), arXiv:1707.01503 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[59]

Georgi, D

H. Georgi, D. B. Kaplan, and L. Randall, Manifesting the Invisible Axion at Low-energies, Phys. Lett. B169, 73 (1986)

1986
[60]

Bauer, M

M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel, and A. Thamm, The Low-Energy Effective Theory of Axions and ALPs, JHEP04, 063, arXiv:2012.12272 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[61]

Di Luzio, M

L. Di Luzio, M. Redi, A. Strumia, A. Tesi, and A. V. Titov, The Too Visible QCD Axion, (2026), arXiv:2602.10057 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[62]

Bazavovet al.(Fermilab Lattice, MILC, TUMQCD), Up-, down-, strange-, charm-, and bottom-quark masses from four-flavor lattice QCD, Phys

A. Bazavovet al.(Fermilab Lattice, MILC, TUMQCD), Up-, down-, strange-, charm-, and bottom-quark masses from four-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D98, 054517 (2018), arXiv:1802.04248 [hep-lat]. [63]Quark versus Gluon Jet Tagging Using Charged Parti- cle Multiplicity with the ATLAS Detector, Tech. Rep. (CERN, Geneva, 2017) aTL-PHYS-PUB-2017-009

work page arXiv 2018