pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21069 · v1 · pith:PDUNZKPRnew · submitted 2026-04-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.chem-ph· physics.comp-ph

Accelerating point defect simulations using data-driven and machine learning approaches

Arun Mannodi-Kanakkithodi , Menglin Huang , Prashun Gorai , Se\'an R. Kavanagh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords point defectsmachine learningdensity functional theorysurrogate modelsinteratomic potentialsphononsdefect formation energymaterials screening
0
0 comments X

The pith

Data-driven machine learning models trained on DFT calculations accelerate point defect simulations while retaining quantum-mechanical accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review outlines the growing use of machine learning to speed up simulations of point defects in solid materials. It covers descriptor-based screening models and especially surrogate models plus interatomic potentials fitted to density functional theory results. These tools deliver fast predictions of defect formation energies and structures in large supercells. They also compute phonon spectra and vibrational free energies to account for temperature effects. The goal is to make detailed defect modeling practical for materials screening and design.

Core claim

Surrogate models and interatomic potentials trained on density functional theory data can produce predictions of defect properties, including phonon modes and finite-temperature free energies, that match the accuracy of full quantum mechanical calculations but at a small fraction of the computational cost.

What carries the argument

Surrogate models and interatomic potentials trained on DFT data for rapid defect energy and phonon calculations.

If this is right

  • High-throughput screening of defect properties across many materials and configurations becomes feasible.
  • Defect energetics can be evaluated at finite temperatures through accurate vibrational contributions.
  • Computational resources are freed for exploring larger systems or more complex defect scenarios.
  • Links between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements of defects can be strengthened through faster data generation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending these models to defects in alloys or at interfaces could broaden their applicability in real materials.
  • Combining ML predictions with targeted experiments might create self-improving training loops for better generalization.
  • These accelerations might enable defect engineering in device-scale simulations that were previously too expensive.
  • Careful validation on diverse test sets remains essential to ensure reliability beyond the training data.

Load-bearing premise

Machine learning models trained on a limited set of DFT calculations will generalize reliably to new defect types and materials outside the training data.

What would settle it

A new defect configuration or material where the ML-predicted formation energy or phonon spectrum differs substantially from a direct DFT computation.

read the original abstract

Point defects in solid-state materials are now routinely simulated using large supercell structures, requiring efficient quantum mechanical solutions. Data-driven and machine learning (ML) models trained on computational data can enable rapid defect property predictions and high-throughput screening. In this article, we provide an overview of prominent efforts to accelerate defect simulations using these approaches. We begin by discussing the motivations for data-driven techniques in defect modeling, and describe efforts over the past decade to use descriptor-based models for rapid screening of defect properties -- most notably in oxides. In particular, we discuss case studies where surrogate models and interatomic potentials were trained on density functional theory (DFT) data, leading to predictions with quantum-mechanical accuracies at a fraction of the cost. In addition to geometry relaxation and formation energy predictions, these interatomic potentials are capable of predicting phonon modes and vibrational free energies to yield defect energetics at finite temperatures -- representing a key frontier for computational defect research. We finish with a discussion on how to connect these approaches and their outputs with experimental data, and provide an outlook on this burgeoning sub-field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an overview of prominent efforts to accelerate point defect simulations in solid-state materials using data-driven and machine learning approaches. It discusses motivations for these techniques, reviews descriptor-based models for rapid screening of defect properties especially in oxides, presents case studies of surrogate models and interatomic potentials trained on DFT data that achieve quantum-mechanical accuracies for formation energies, geometry relaxations, phonon modes, and vibrational free energies at finite temperatures, and covers connections to experimental data along with an outlook on the sub-field.

Significance. If the reviewed case studies hold as described, this overview is significant for highlighting how ML methods can deliver DFT-level accuracy for key defect properties at a fraction of the computational cost. This enables high-throughput screening and access to finite-temperature energetics via phonons and free energies, which the paper correctly identifies as a key frontier. The work provides a useful synthesis of progress over the past decade and gives appropriate credit to the underlying literature.

minor comments (2)
  1. Consider adding a summary table of the key case studies reviewed, including reported error metrics (e.g., formation energy errors) and computational speedups relative to direct DFT, to enhance readability and facilitate quick comparisons for readers.
  2. The abstract and introduction refer to 'quantum-mechanical accuracies' and 'a fraction of the cost' without providing even brief quantitative benchmarks or typical error ranges from the cited works; adding one or two concrete examples would strengthen the claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript, which accurately captures its scope as an overview of data-driven and machine learning approaches for accelerating point defect simulations. We appreciate the recognition of the significance of these methods for high-throughput screening and finite-temperature energetics, as well as the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review summarizing external literature without new derivations

full rationale

This is a review/overview paper that discusses motivations for data-driven techniques, summarizes case studies from the past decade on descriptor-based models and interatomic potentials trained on DFT data, and reports on their reported capabilities for geometry relaxation, formation energies, phonons, and finite-temperature free energies. No original derivations, equations, or predictions are presented by the authors themselves; all quantitative claims about accuracies and cost reductions are explicitly attributed to cited external works. There are no self-definitional steps, fitted inputs called predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central content to the paper's own inputs. The paper is self-contained as a descriptive summary and does not advance a new theorem or result that could be circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As this is a review paper, there are no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced; all content draws from cited prior work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1105 out tokens · 28335 ms · 2026-05-09T23:26:20.587538+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 143 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Defects in semiconductors,

    L. Vines, E. Monakhov, and A. Kuznetsov, “Defects in semiconductors,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 132, p. 150401, 10 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Perspective on defect control in semiconductors for photovoltaics,

    X. Cai and S.-H. Wei, “Perspective on defect control in semiconductors for photovoltaics,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 134, no. 22, p. 220901, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    The defect challenge of wide-bandgap semiconductors for photovoltaics and beyond,

    A. M. Ganose, D. O. Scanlon, A. Walsh, and R. L. Z. Hoye, “The defect challenge of wide-bandgap semiconductors for photovoltaics and beyond,”Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 4715, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Pycdt: A python toolkit for modeling point defects in semiconductors and insulators,

    D. Broberg, B. Medasani, N. E. Zimmermann, G. Yu, A. Canning, M. Haranczyk, M. Asta, and G. Hautier, “Pycdt: A python toolkit for modeling point defects in semiconductors and insulators,”Computer Physics Communications, vol. 226, pp. 165–179, 2018. 25

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Point defect engineering in thin-film solar cells,

    J. S. Park, S. Kim, Z. Xie, and A. Walsh, “Point defect engineering in thin-film solar cells,”Nature Reviews Materials, vol. 3, pp. 194–210, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Beginner’s guide to interpreting defect and defect level diagrams,

    P. Gorai, “Beginner’s guide to interpreting defect and defect level diagrams,”PRX Energy, vol. 4, p. 032001, Aug 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Quantum Monte Carlo assessment of embed- ding for a strongly-correlated defect: interplay between mean-field and interactions,

    K. G. Kleiner, S. Joshi, W. Lee, A. Hampel, M. R¨ osner, C. E. Dreyer, and L. K. Wagner, “Quantum Monte Carlo assessment of embed- ding for a strongly-correlated defect: interplay between mean-field and interactions,” May 2025. arXiv:2505.00845 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Accuracy of$GW$for calculating defect energy levels in solids,

    W. Chen and A. Pasquarello, “Accuracy of$GW$for calculating defect energy levels in solids,”Physical Review B, vol. 96, p. 020101, July 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Real-space representation of the quasiparticle self-consistent G W self- energy and its application to defect calculations,

    O. Dernek, D. Skachkov, W. R. L. Lambrecht, and M. van Schilfgaarde, “Real-space representation of the quasiparticle self-consistent G W self- energy and its application to defect calculations,”Physical Review B, vol. 105, p. 205136, May 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    On the dopability of semiconductors and governing material properties,

    A. Goyal, P. Gorai, S. Anand, E. S. Toberer, G. J. Snyder, and V. Ste- vanovi´ c, “On the dopability of semiconductors and governing material properties,”Chemistry of Materials, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 4467–4480, 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Doping limits of phosphorus, arsenic, and antimony in cdte,

    I. Chatratin, B. Dou, S.-H. Wei, and A. Janotti, “Doping limits of phosphorus, arsenic, and antimony in cdte,”The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 273–278, 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Dopants and defects in ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors,

    J. L. Lyons, D. Wickramaratne, and A. Janotti, “Dopants and defects in ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors,”Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, vol. 30, p. 101148, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Data-driven machine learn- ing model for the prediction of oxygen vacancy formation energy of metal oxide materials,

    Z. Wan, Q.-D. Wang, D. Liu, and J. Liang, “Data-driven machine learn- ing model for the prediction of oxygen vacancy formation energy of metal oxide materials,”Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 23, pp. 15675–15684, 2021

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Oxide enthalpy of formation and band gap energy as accurate descriptors of oxygen vacancy formation energetics,

    A. M. Deml, V. Stevanovi´ c, C. L. Muhich, C. B. Musgrave, and R. O’Hayre, “Oxide enthalpy of formation and band gap energy as accurate descriptors of oxygen vacancy formation energetics,”Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 1996–2004, 2014

    work page 1996

  15. [15]

    Data-driven design of novel halide perovskite alloys,

    A. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi and M. K. Y. Chan, “Data-driven design of novel halide perovskite alloys,”Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 15, pp. 1930– 1949, 2022. 26

    work page 1930

  16. [16]

    First-principles calculations for point defects in solids,

    C. Freysoldt, B. Grabowski, T. Hickel, J. Neugebauer, G. Kresse, A. Jan- otti, and C. G. Van de Walle, “First-principles calculations for point defects in solids,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 86, pp. 253–305, Mar. 2014

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Guidelines for robust and reproducible point defect simulations in crystals,

    A. G. Squires, S. R. Kavanagh, A. Walsh, and D. O. Scanlon, “Guidelines for robust and reproducible point defect simulations in crystals,”Nature Reviews Materials, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2026

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    Quantitative modeling of point defects inβ-Ga2O3 combining hybrid functional energetics with semicon- ductor and processes thermodynamics,

    K. A. Arnab, M. Stephens, I. Maxfield, C. Lee, E. Ertekin, Y. K. Froda- son, J. B. Varley, and M. A. Scarpulla, “Quantitative modeling of point defects inβ-Ga2O3 combining hybrid functional energetics with semicon- ductor and processes thermodynamics,”Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, May 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    S. R. Kavanagh,Accurately Modelling Point Defects in Semiconduc- tors: The Case of CdTe. Doctoral, UCL (University College London), Jan. 2024. Publication Title: Doctoral thesis, UCL (University College London)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Imperfections are not 0 K: free energy of point defects in crystals,

    I. Mosquera-Lois, S. R. Kavanagh, J. Klarbring, K. Tolborg, and A. Walsh, “Imperfections are not 0 K: free energy of point defects in crystals,”Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 52, pp. 5812–5826, Aug. 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Energetics of quaternary iii-v alloys described by incorporation and clustering of impurities,

    K. Biswas and S. Lany, “Energetics of quaternary iii-v alloys described by incorporation and clustering of impurities,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 80, p. 115206, Sep 2009

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Defect interactions and the role of complexes in the CdTe solar cell absorber,

    D. Krasikov and I. Sankin, “Defect interactions and the role of complexes in the CdTe solar cell absorber,”Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 5, pp. 3503–3513, Feb. 2017

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Cation disorder dominates the defect chemistry of high-voltage LiMn 1.5 Ni 0.5 O 4 (LMNO) spinel cathodes,

    J. Cen, B. Zhu, S. R. Kavanagh, A. G. Squires, and D. O. Scanlon, “Cation disorder dominates the defect chemistry of high-voltage LiMn 1.5 Ni 0.5 O 4 (LMNO) spinel cathodes,”Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 11, no. 25, pp. 13353–13370, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Beyond thermodynamic defect models: A kinetic simulation of arsenic activation in CdTe,

    D. Krasikov and I. Sankin, “Beyond thermodynamic defect models: A kinetic simulation of arsenic activation in CdTe,”Physical Review Materials, vol. 2, p. 103803, Oct. 2018

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Universal machine learn- ing framework for defect predictions in zinc blende semiconductors,

    A. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, X. Xiang, L. Jacoby, R. Biegaj, S. T. Dunham, D. R. Gamelin, and M. K. Chan, “Universal machine learn- ing framework for defect predictions in zinc blende semiconductors,” Patterns, vol. 3, no. 3, 2022. 27

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    High-throughput calculations of charged point defect properties with semi-local density functional the- ory—performance benchmarks for materials screening applications,

    D. Broberg, K. Bystrom, S. Srivastava, D. Dahliah, B. A. D. Williamson, L. Weston, D. O. Scanlon, G.-M. Rignanese, S. Dwaraknath, J. Varley, K. A. Persson, M. Asta, and G. Hautier, “High-throughput calculations of charged point defect properties with semi-local density functional the- ory—performance benchmarks for materials screening applications,”npj Co...

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Computationally predicted energies and properties of defects in gan,

    J. L. Lyons and C. G. Van de Walle, “Computationally predicted energies and properties of defects in gan,”npj Computational Materials, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 12, 2017

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Iden- tifying the ground state structures of point defects in solids,

    I. Mosquera-Lois, S. R. Kavanagh, A. Walsh, and D. O. Scanlon, “Iden- tifying the ground state structures of point defects in solids,”npj Computational Materials, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 25, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Stability and molecu- lar pathways to the formation of spin defects in silicon carbide,

    E. M. Y. Lee, A. Yu, J. J. de Pablo, and G. Galli, “Stability and molecu- lar pathways to the formation of spin defects in silicon carbide,”Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 6325, 2021

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    One-defect one-potential strategy for accurate machine learning prediction of phonons in defect- containing supercells,

    J. Zhou, X. Li, M. Huang, and S. Chen, “One-defect one-potential strategy for accurate machine learning prediction of phonons in defect- containing supercells,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 112, p. 235205, Dec 2025

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Dft+u studies of cu dop- ing and p-type compensation in crystalline and amorphous zns,

    H. H. Pham, G. T. Barkema, and L.-W. Wang, “Dft+u studies of cu dop- ing and p-type compensation in crystalline and amorphous zns,”Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 17, pp. 26270–26276, 2015

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Self- compensation in phosphorus-doped cdte,

    M. A. Flores, W. Orellana, and E. Men´ endez-Proupin, “Self- compensation in phosphorus-doped cdte,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, p. 134115, Oct 2017

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Theoretical study of intrinsic defects in cubic silicon carbide 3c-sic,

    P. A. Schultz, R. M. Van Ginhoven, and A. H. Edwards, “Theoretical study of intrinsic defects in cubic silicon carbide 3c-sic,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 103, p. 195202, May 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Caution! static supercell calculations of defect migration in higher symmetry abx3 perovskite halides may be unreliable: A case study of methylammonium lead iodide,

    R. A. De Souza, D. Kemp, M. J. Wolf, and A. H. H. Ramadan, “Caution! static supercell calculations of defect migration in higher symmetry abx3 perovskite halides may be unreliable: A case study of methylammonium lead iodide,”The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 13, no. 49, pp. 11363–11368, 2022

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Evolutionary computing and machine learning for discovering of low-energy defect configurations,

    M. Arrigoni and G. K. H. Madsen, “Evolutionary computing and machine learning for discovering of low-energy defect configurations,” npj Computational Materials, vol. 7, pp. 1–13, May 2021. Number: 1

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Anion vacancies as a source of persistent photo- conductivity in II-VI and chalcopyrite semiconductors,

    S. Lany and A. Zunger, “Anion vacancies as a source of persistent photo- conductivity in II-VI and chalcopyrite semiconductors,”Physical Review 28 B, vol. 72, p. 035215, July 2005

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    doped: Python toolkit for robust and repeatable charged defect supercell calculations,

    S. R. Kavanagh, A. G. Squires, A. Nicolson, I. Mosquera-Lois, A. M. Ganose, B. Zhu, K. Brlec, A. Walsh, and D. O. Scanlon, “doped: Python toolkit for robust and repeatable charged defect supercell calculations,” Journal of Open Source Software, vol. 9, p. 6433, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Shak- eNBreak: Navigating the defect configurational landscape,

    I. Mosquera-Lois, S. R. Kavanagh, A. Walsh, and D. O. Scanlon, “Shak- eNBreak: Navigating the defect configurational landscape,”Journal of Open Source Software, vol. 7, p. 4817, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Rapid Recombination by Cadmium Vacancies in CdTe,

    S. R. Kavanagh, A. Walsh, and D. O. Scanlon, “Rapid Recombination by Cadmium Vacancies in CdTe,”ACS Energy Letters, vol. 6, pp. 1392– 1398, Apr. 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Machine-learning structural reconstructions for accelerated point defect calculations,

    I. Mosquera-Lois, S. R. Kavanagh, A. M. Ganose, and A. Walsh, “Machine-learning structural reconstructions for accelerated point defect calculations,”npj Computational Materials, vol. 10, pp. 1–9, June 2024

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Identifying split vacancy defects with machine-learned foundation models and electrostatics,

    S. R. Kavanagh, “Identifying split vacancy defects with machine-learned foundation models and electrostatics,”Journal of Physics: Energy, vol. 7, p. 045002, July 2025

    work page 2025

  42. [43]

    Point defects in ga2o3,

    M. D. McCluskey, “Point defects in ga2o3,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 127, p. 101101, 03 2020

    work page 2020

  43. [44]

    Comparative study of as and cu doping stability in cdsete absorbers,

    D. Krasikov, D. Guo, S. Demtsu, and I. Sankin, “Comparative study of as and cu doping stability in cdsete absorbers,”Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 224, p. 111012, 2021

    work page 2021

  44. [45]

    Point defect formation at finite temperatures with machine learning force fields,

    I. Mosquera-Lois, J. Klarbring, and A. Walsh, “Point defect formation at finite temperatures with machine learning force fields,”Chemical Science, Apr. 2025

    work page 2025

  45. [46]

    Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects,

    R. Ramprasad, R. Batra, G. Pilania, A. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, and C. Kim, “Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects,”npj Computational Materials, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 54, 2017

    work page 2017

  46. [47]

    Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science,

    J. Schmidt, M. R. G. Marques, S. Botti, and M. A. L. Marques, “Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science,”npj Computational Materials, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 83, 2019. 29

    work page 2019

  47. [48]

    Intrinsic material properties dictating oxygen vacancy formation energetics in metal oxides,

    A. M. Deml, A. M. Holder, R. P. O’Hayre, C. B. Musgrave, and V. Stevanovi´ c, “Intrinsic material properties dictating oxygen vacancy formation energetics in metal oxides,”The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1948–1953, 2015

    work page 1948

  48. [49]

    Factors governing oxygen vacancy formation in oxide perovskites,

    R. B. Wexler, G. S. Gautam, E. B. Stechel, and E. A. Carter, “Factors governing oxygen vacancy formation in oxide perovskites,”Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 143, no. 33, pp. 13212–13227, 2021

    work page 2021

  49. [50]

    Simple structural descriptor obtained from symbolic classification for predicting the oxygen vacancy defect formation of perovskites,

    S. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Duan, K. Wang, W. Zhang, R. Guo, and F. Xie, “Simple structural descriptor obtained from symbolic classification for predicting the oxygen vacancy defect formation of perovskites,”ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 11758–11767, 2022

    work page 2022

  50. [51]

    A machine learning-assisted study of the formation of oxygen vacancies in anatase titanium dioxide,

    D. Wang, R. Zan, X. Zhu, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Gu, and Y. Li, “A machine learning-assisted study of the formation of oxygen vacancies in anatase titanium dioxide,”RSC Adv., vol. 14, pp. 33198–33205, 2024

    work page 2024

  51. [52]

    Machine learning-assisted dft reveals key descriptors governing the vacancy formation energy in pd-substituted multicomponent ceria,

    P. Pentyala, V. Singhania, V. K. Duggineni, and P. A. Deshpande, “Machine learning-assisted dft reveals key descriptors governing the vacancy formation energy in pd-substituted multicomponent ceria,” Molecular Catalysis, vol. 522, p. 112190, 2022

    work page 2022

  52. [53]

    Insights into oxygen vacancies from high-throughput first-principles calculations,

    Y. Kumagai, N. Tsunoda, A. Takahashi, and F. Oba, “Insights into oxygen vacancies from high-throughput first-principles calculations,” Physical Review Materials, vol. 5, p. 123803, Dec. 2021

    work page 2021

  53. [54]

    Machine Learning Pre- diction of Charged Defect Formation Energies from Crystal Structures,

    S. Kiyohara, C. Shibui, S. Bae, and Y. Kumagai, “Machine Learning Pre- diction of Charged Defect Formation Energies from Crystal Structures,” Oct. 2025. arXiv:2510.00513 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    Descriptor-based approach for the prediction of cation vacancy formation energies and transi- tion levels,

    J. B. Varley, A. Samanta, and V. Lordi, “Descriptor-based approach for the prediction of cation vacancy formation energies and transi- tion levels,”The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 8, no. 20, pp. 5059–5063, 2017

    work page 2017

  55. [56]

    Machine learning for impurity charge-state transition levels in semiconductors from elemental properties using multi-fidelity datasets,

    M. P. Polak, R. Jacobs, A. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, M. K. Y. Chan, and D. Morgan, “Machine learning for impurity charge-state transition levels in semiconductors from elemental properties using multi-fidelity datasets,”The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 156, p. 114110, 03 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [57]

    Defect graph neural networks for materials discovery in high- temperature clean-energy applications,

    M. D. Witman, A. Goyal, T. Ogitsu, A. H. McDaniel, and S. Lany, “Defect graph neural networks for materials discovery in high- temperature clean-energy applications,”Nature Computational Science, vol. 3, pp. 675–686, Aug. 2023. 30

    work page 2023

  57. [58]

    Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for an Accurate and Interpretable Prediction of Material Properties,

    T. Xie and J. C. Grossman, “Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for an Accurate and Interpretable Prediction of Material Properties,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, p. 145301, Apr. 2018

    work page 2018

  58. [59]

    Defect Diffusion Graph Neural Networks for Materials Discovery in High-Temperature Energy Applications,

    L. Way, C. D. Spataru, R. E. Jones, D. R. Trinkle, A. J. E. Rowberg, J. B. Varley, R. B. Wexler, C. M. Smyth, T. C. Douglas, S. R. Bishop, E. J. Fuller, A. H. McDaniel, S. Lany, and M. D. Witman, “Defect Diffusion Graph Neural Networks for Materials Discovery in High-Temperature Energy Applications,”Chemistry of Materials, vol. 37, pp. 6473–6484, Sept. 2025

    work page 2025

  59. [60]

    Machine-learned impurity level pre- diction for semiconductors: the example of cd-based chalcogenides,

    A. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, M. Y. Toriyama, F. G. Sen, M. J. Davis, R. F. Klie, and M. K. Y. Chan, “Machine-learned impurity level pre- diction for semiconductors: the example of cd-based chalcogenides,”npj Computational Materials, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 39, 2020

    work page 2020

  60. [61]

    Accelerated screening of functional atomic impurities in halide perovskites using high-throughput computations and machine learning,

    A. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi and M. K. Chan, “Accelerated screening of functional atomic impurities in halide perovskites using high-throughput computations and machine learning,”Journal of Materials Science, vol. 57, no. 23, pp. 10736–10754, 2022

    work page 2022

  61. [62]

    Modified band alignment method to obtain hybrid functional accuracy from standard dft: Application to defects in highly mismatched iii-v:bi alloys,

    M. P. Polak, R. Kudrawiec, R. Jacobs, I. Szlufarska, and D. Morgan, “Modified band alignment method to obtain hybrid functional accuracy from standard dft: Application to defects in highly mismatched iii-v:bi alloys,”Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 5, p. 124601, Dec 2021

    work page 2021

  62. [63]

    Multi-fidelity Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Charged Point Defects,

    X. Wang, I. Mosquera-Lois, and A. Walsh, “Multi-fidelity Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Charged Point Defects,” Mar. 2026. arXiv:2603.05238 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  63. [64]

    Machine learning accelerated study of defect energy levels in perovskites,

    X. Wu, H. Chen, J. Wang, and X. Niu, “Machine learning accelerated study of defect energy levels in perovskites,”The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 127, no. 23, pp. 11387–11395, 2023

    work page 2023

  64. [65]

    Defect formation in cssni3 from density functional theory and machine learning,

    C. Khamdang and M. Wang, “Defect formation in cssni3 from density functional theory and machine learning,”J. Mater. Chem. C, vol. 13, pp. 7550–7557, 2025

    work page 2025

  65. [66]

    Generalized Neural-Network Representa- tion of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces,

    J. Behler and M. Parrinello, “Generalized Neural-Network Representa- tion of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, p. 146401, Apr. 2007

    work page 2007

  66. [67]

    Cross- disciplinary perspectives on the potential for artificial intelligence across 31 chemistry,

    A. M. Mroz, A. R. Basford, F. Hastedt, I. S. Jayasekera, I. Mosquera- Lois, R. Sedgwick, P. J. Ballester, J. D. Bocarsly, E. A. d. R. Chanona, M. L. Evans, J. M. Frost, A. M. Ganose, R. L. Greenaway, K. K. M. Hii, Y. Li, R. Misener, A. Walsh, D. Zhang, and K. E. Jelfs, “Cross- disciplinary perspectives on the potential for artificial intelligence across 3...

    work page 2025

  67. [68]

    Data Generation for Machine Learning Interatomic Poten- tials and Beyond,

    M. Kulichenko, B. Nebgen, N. Lubbers, J. S. Smith, K. Barros, A. E. A. Allen, A. Habib, E. Shinkle, N. Fedik, Y. W. Li, R. A. Messerly, and S. Tretiak, “Data Generation for Machine Learning Interatomic Poten- tials and Beyond,”Chemical Reviews, vol. 124, pp. 13681–13714, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  68. [69]

    Advanced Materials31(46), 1902765 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/ADMA.201902765

    V. L. Deringer, M. A. Caro, and G. Cs´ anyi, “Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials as Emerging Tools for Materials Science,” Advanced Materials, vol. 31, no. 46, p. 1902765, 2019. eprint: https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adma.201902765

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201902765 2019

  69. [70]

    How to vali- date machine-learned interatomic potentials,

    J. D. Morrow, J. L. A. Gardner, and V. L. Deringer, “How to vali- date machine-learned interatomic potentials,”The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 158, p. 121501, Mar. 2023

    work page 2023

  70. [71]

    A practical guide to machine learning interatomic potentials – Status and future,

    R. Jacobs, D. Morgan, S. Attarian, J. Meng, C. Shen, Z. Wu, C. Y. Xie, J. H. Yang, N. Artrith, B. Blaiszik, G. Ceder, K. Choudhary, G. Csanyi, E. D. Cubuk, B. Deng, R. Drautz, X. Fu, J. Godwin, V. Honavar, O. Isayev, A. Johansson, B. Kozinsky, S. Martiniani, S. P. Ong, I. Poltavsky, K. Schmidt, S. Takamoto, A. P. Thompson, J. West- ermayr, and B. M. Wood,...

    work page 2025

  71. [72]

    Machine Learning Force Fields,

    O. T. Unke, S. Chmiela, H. E. Sauceda, M. Gastegger, I. Poltavsky, K. T. Sch¨ utt, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. M¨ uller, “Machine Learning Force Fields,”Chemical Reviews, vol. 121, pp. 10142–10186, Aug. 2021

    work page 2021

  72. [73]

    Explicit Mul- tielement Extension of the Spectral Neighbor Analysis Potential for Chemically Complex Systems,

    M. A. Cusentino, M. A. Wood, and A. P. Thompson, “Explicit Mul- tielement Extension of the Spectral Neighbor Analysis Potential for Chemically Complex Systems,”The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 124, pp. 5456–5464, July 2020

    work page 2020

  73. [74]

    Systematic softening in universal machine learn- ing interatomic potentials,

    B. Deng, Y. Choi, P. Zhong, J. Riebesell, S. Anand, Z. Li, K. Jun, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, “Systematic softening in universal machine learn- ing interatomic potentials,”npj Computational Materials, vol. 11, p. 9, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  74. [75]

    Universal machine learning interatomic potentials poised to supplant DFT in modeling gen- eral defects in metals and random alloys,

    F. Shuang, Z. Wei, K. Liu, W. Gao, and P. Dey, “Universal machine learning interatomic potentials poised to supplant DFT in modeling gen- eral defects in metals and random alloys,”Machine Learning: Science and Technology, vol. 6, p. 030501, July 2025

    work page 2025

  75. [76]

    CHIPS-FF: Evaluating Universal Machine Learning Force Fields for Material Properties,

    D. Wines and K. Choudhary, “CHIPS-FF: Evaluating Universal Machine Learning Force Fields for Material Properties,”ACS Materials Letters, 32 vol. 7, pp. 2105–2114, June 2025

    work page 2025

  76. [77]

    Non-collinear magnetic atomic cluster expansion for iron,

    M. Rinaldi, M. Mrovec, A. Bochkarev, Y. Lysogorskiy, and R. Drautz, “Non-collinear magnetic atomic cluster expansion for iron,”npj Compu- tational Materials, vol. 10, p. 12, Jan. 2024

    work page 2024

  77. [78]

    A framework to eval- uate machine learning crystal stability predictions,

    J. Riebesell, R. E. A. Goodall, P. Benner, Y. Chiang, B. Deng, G. Ceder, M. Asta, A. A. Lee, A. Jain, and K. A. Persson, “A framework to eval- uate machine learning crystal stability predictions,”Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 7, pp. 836–847, June 2025

    work page 2025

  78. [79]

    MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fields,

    I. Batatia, D. P. Kovacs, G. Simm, C. Ortner, and G. Csanyi, “MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fields,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 11423–11436, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  79. [80]

    The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation,

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, and K. a. Persson, “The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation,”APL Materials, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 011002, 2013

    work page 2013

  80. [81]

    Thermal Stabilization of Defect Charge States and Finite-Temperature Charge Transition Levels,

    T. Hainer, E. Berger, E. Berger, O. Hildeberg, P. Erhart, and J. Wiktor, “Thermal Stabilization of Defect Charge States and Finite-Temperature Charge Transition Levels,” Dec. 2025. arXiv:2512.15463 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.