pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21492 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Solving Cosmological Puzzles using Finite Temperature νSMEFT

Debajyoti Choudhury , Jaydeb Das , Tripurari Srivastava
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords dark matterelectroweak phase transitionresonant leptogenesisMajorana neutrinosSMEFTgravitational wavesbaryon asymmetryneutrino oscillations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A minimal extension of the Standard Model with three heavy Majorana neutrinos simultaneously explains dark matter, a strong first-order electroweak phase transition, and the universe's baryon asymmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that augmenting the Standard Model with three heavy Majorana neutrinos in an effective field theory up to dimension-six operators can address three separate cosmological problems within one consistent setup. The pure Higgs operator strengthens the electroweak phase transition enough to be strongly first-order, while renormalization-group running and finite-temperature effects in the unbroken phase create the small mass splittings needed for resonant leptogenesis to generate the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry. One of the neutrinos is protected by a discrete symmetry and serves as a fermionic dark matter candidate whose effective interactions fit current experimental limits on annihilation, scattering, and indirect detection, all while matching neutrino oscillation data.

Core claim

In the neutrino-extended SMEFT with operators up to mass dimension six, the pure Higgs operator supplies the dominant enhancement for a strong first-order electroweak phase transition, one-loop RG corrections together with finite-temperature contributions dynamically generate the tiny mass splittings among quasi-degenerate heavy neutrinos that enable low-scale resonant leptogenesis, and a discrete symmetry stabilizes one neutrino as a fermionic dark matter candidate whose dimension-five and dimension-six interactions produce viable phenomenology consistent with all bounds.

What carries the argument

The neutrino-extended Standard Model Effective Field Theory (νSMEFT) truncated at mass dimension six, in which the pure Higgs operator controls the strength of the electroweak phase transition and the higher-dimensional operators govern the mass splittings, leptogenesis, and dark matter interactions.

If this is right

  • The stochastic gravitational-wave background produced by the phase transition is dominated by sound waves in the plasma, with magnetohydrodynamic turbulence contributing only a subleading amount.
  • Solving the Boltzmann equations reproduces the observed baryon asymmetry while remaining consistent with neutrino oscillation data and charged-lepton-flavor-violation bounds.
  • The dark matter candidate undergoes annihilation, elastic scattering, and indirect detection processes that stay within current experimental limits.
  • The dark matter sector stays decoupled from the dynamics driving the electroweak phase transition and leptogenesis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future gravitational-wave detectors could observe the specific frequency spectrum set by the sound-wave contribution from the electroweak transition.
  • Collider searches for the effects of the dimension-six operators could provide independent tests of the same parameter space used for leptogenesis.
  • The discrete symmetry that stabilizes the dark matter neutrino may impose additional restrictions on how neutrino masses are generated in ultraviolet completions.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that one-loop renormalization-group corrections and finite-temperature contributions in the symmetric phase can dynamically produce the precise tiny mass splittings among the heavy neutrinos that are required for resonant leptogenesis.

What would settle it

A calculation demonstrating that the generated mass splittings either violate electroweak precision constraints or fail to yield the observed baryon asymmetry when the Boltzmann equations are solved for parameters consistent with neutrino oscillation data.

read the original abstract

We study a minimal framework that naturally yields viable Dark Matter, a strong first-order electroweak phase transition and low-scale resonant leptogenesis. Augmenting the Standard Model with three heavy Majorana neutrinos, we study the corresponding neutrino-extended Standard Model Effective Field Theory, including operators upto mass-dimension six. The pure Higgs operator provides the dominant enhancement required for a strong first-order electroweak phase transition, while the remaining operators yield subleading effects consistent with electroweak precision constraints. The signal for the stochastic gravitational-wave background is dominated by sound waves in the plasma, with magnetohydrodynamic turbulence providing a subleading contribution. Low-scale resonant leptogenesis is realized through tiny mass splittings among quasi-degenerate heavy neutrinos, dynamically generated in the symmetric phase by the combined effect of one-loop RG-induced corrections and finite-temperature contributions. Solving the Boltzmann equations, we show that the observed baryon asymmetry of the Universe can be reproduced while remaining consistent with neutrino oscillation data and charged-lepton-flavor-violation constraints. One of the heavy neutrinos is stabilized by a discrete symmetry thereby acting as a fermionic dark matter candidate. Its interactions with the Standard Model arise from dimension-five and dimension-six effective operators, leading to viable annihilation, elastic scattering, and indirect detection phenomenology compatible with current experimental bounds. The dark matter sector remains decoupled from the dynamics of the electroweak phase transition and leptogenesis, allowing all three phenomena to be consistently realized within a unified effective field theory framework.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript augments the SM with three heavy Majorana neutrinos in the νSMEFT up to dimension-six operators. It claims this framework simultaneously realizes (i) a strong first-order electroweak phase transition driven primarily by the pure Higgs operator, (ii) low-scale resonant leptogenesis via tiny mass splittings among the heavy neutrinos that are dynamically generated by one-loop RG running plus finite-temperature effects in the symmetric phase, and (iii) fermionic dark matter from one neutrino stabilized by a discrete symmetry. Boltzmann equations are solved to reproduce the observed baryon asymmetry while remaining consistent with neutrino oscillation data and CLFV bounds; the DM sector is decoupled from the PT and leptogenesis dynamics, and a stochastic GW background signal is predicted.

Significance. If the numerical results and dynamical mass-splitting mechanism hold, the work would constitute a notable unified EFT treatment of three cosmological problems with testable implications for GW detectors and DM searches. The explicit inclusion of finite-temperature corrections and the decoupling of the DM sector are constructive features. The paper would benefit from making the RG and Boltzmann calculations fully reproducible.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sections discussing RG running, finite-temperature corrections, and resonant leptogenesis] The central leptogenesis claim rests on the assertion that one-loop RG-induced corrections from the dim-6 operators together with finite-T contributions in the symmetric phase dynamically generate mass splittings δm_ij satisfying δm ~ Γ (the decay width) for resonant enhancement while keeping the common mass M in the TeV range. No explicit RG beta functions, numerical evolution results, or scan demonstrating that viable δm values arise without violating electroweak precision observables or neutrino data are supplied; this is load-bearing for the unified scenario.
  2. [Boltzmann-equation analysis and parameter-space discussion] The reproduction of the observed baryon asymmetry is stated to follow from solving the Boltzmann equations, yet the manuscript supplies neither the specific Wilson-coefficient values, the dynamically generated δm_ij used as input, nor any error bars or exclusion criteria on the parameter space. Without this, it is impossible to verify that the same operators and splittings simultaneously satisfy all three phenomena.
minor comments (3)
  1. Clarify the precise discrete symmetry that stabilizes one heavy neutrino as DM and enumerate the allowed dim-5 and dim-6 operators that mediate its interactions with the SM.
  2. Specify the exact pure Higgs operator (e.g., (H†H)^3 or similar) and the range of its Wilson coefficient that produces the strong first-order PT while remaining consistent with EW precision data.
  3. Provide the explicit formulas or references used for the sound-wave and MHD-turbulence contributions to the GW spectrum.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments correctly identify areas where additional explicit documentation will improve reproducibility of the RG evolution and Boltzmann solutions. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested details in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sections discussing RG running, finite-temperature corrections, and resonant leptogenesis] The central leptogenesis claim rests on the assertion that one-loop RG-induced corrections from the dim-6 operators together with finite-T contributions in the symmetric phase dynamically generate mass splittings δm_ij satisfying δm ~ Γ (the decay width) for resonant enhancement while keeping the common mass M in the TeV range. No explicit RG beta functions, numerical evolution results, or scan demonstrating that viable δm values arise without violating electroweak precision observables or neutrino data are supplied; this is load-bearing for the unified scenario.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit one-loop beta functions and numerical demonstration of viable δm_ij are essential for verifying the dynamical splitting mechanism. The manuscript describes the combined RG and finite-T origin of the splittings and states that they satisfy δm ~ Γ while remaining consistent with precision observables, but the referee is correct that the beta functions themselves and the scan results are not displayed. In the revision we will add the complete set of one-loop beta functions for the relevant dimension-six Wilson coefficients in a new appendix, include plots of the RG evolution of the mass splittings from the symmetric phase down to the electroweak scale, and provide a summary table of benchmark points that simultaneously satisfy neutrino oscillation data, CLFV bounds, and electroweak precision constraints. These additions will make the load-bearing claim fully reproducible. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Boltzmann-equation analysis and parameter-space discussion] The reproduction of the observed baryon asymmetry is stated to follow from solving the Boltzmann equations, yet the manuscript supplies neither the specific Wilson-coefficient values, the dynamically generated δm_ij used as input, nor any error bars or exclusion criteria on the parameter space. Without this, it is impossible to verify that the same operators and splittings simultaneously satisfy all three phenomena.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the specific numerical inputs and output ranges for the Boltzmann solutions were not tabulated. The manuscript states that the observed baryon asymmetry is reproduced while remaining consistent with neutrino data and CLFV bounds, but does not list the Wilson coefficients or the exact δm_ij values employed. In the revision we will supply two benchmark points with explicit Wilson-coefficient values, the corresponding dynamically generated δm_ij, the resulting baryon asymmetry (with numerical uncertainty from the integration), and the exclusion criteria applied from neutrino oscillation and CLFV data. This will explicitly demonstrate that the same operators and splittings simultaneously realize leptogenesis, the strong first-order phase transition, and the decoupled dark-matter phenomenology. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper augments the SM with three heavy Majorana neutrinos plus dimension-six operators in the νSMEFT. It attributes the strong first-order electroweak phase transition to the pure Higgs operator (with subleading effects from others), asserts that tiny mass splittings among the heavy neutrinos arise dynamically from one-loop RG running combined with finite-temperature corrections in the symmetric phase, solves the Boltzmann equations to reproduce the observed baryon asymmetry, and stabilizes one neutrino as fermionic DM via a discrete symmetry whose interactions come from dimension-five and -six operators. The text explicitly states that the DM sector is decoupled from the EWPT and leptogenesis dynamics. No equations, statements, or self-citations in the provided abstract or description reduce any claimed output (asymmetry, splittings, or phase-transition strength) to an input by construction, nor rename a fit as a prediction, nor rely on a load-bearing self-citation chain. The framework is presented as consistent with external data (neutrino oscillations, CLFV bounds, DM searches) without tautological reduction, qualifying as an honest non-finding of circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the introduction of three new heavy Majorana neutrinos and a discrete symmetry not present in the Standard Model, plus several Wilson coefficients and mass parameters that are adjusted to match cosmological and precision data; the finite-temperature generation of mass splittings is postulated without independent derivation.

free parameters (2)
  • Wilson coefficients of dimension-six operators
    Chosen to enhance the electroweak phase transition while satisfying electroweak precision constraints
  • Mass splittings among heavy neutrinos
    Dynamically generated but numerically adjusted to reproduce the observed baryon asymmetry via resonant leptogenesis
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Standard Model plus three heavy Majorana neutrinos remains a valid effective description up to the relevant energy scales
    Foundation of the νSMEFT framework used throughout
  • ad hoc to paper Finite-temperature corrections and RG running generate the required tiny mass splittings in the symmetric phase
    Invoked to realize low-scale resonant leptogenesis
invented entities (2)
  • Discrete symmetry stabilizing one heavy neutrino no independent evidence
    purpose: To render one neutrino stable and serve as fermionic dark matter
    New symmetry introduced to provide a dark-matter candidate without additional fields
  • Three heavy Majorana neutrinos no independent evidence
    purpose: To enable dark matter, leptogenesis, and influence on the electroweak phase transition
    New particles beyond the Standard Model postulated to solve the three cosmological puzzles

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5568 in / 2008 out tokens · 52330 ms · 2026-05-09T21:57:20.449399+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Sakharov,Violation of cp invariance, c asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Soviet Physics Uspekhi34(1991) 392

    A.D. Sakharov,Violation of cp invariance, c asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Soviet Physics Uspekhi34(1991) 392

    1991

  2. [2]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]. – 34 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Is There a Hot Electroweak Phase Transition at $m_H\gsim m_W$?

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2887 [hep-ph/9605288]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  4. [4]

    Csikor, Z

    F. Csikor, Z. Fodor and J. Heitger,Endpoint of the hot electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 21 [hep-ph/9809291]

    work page arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    The Standard Model cross-over on the lattice

    M. D’Onofrio and K. Rummukainen,Standard model cross-over on the lattice,Phys. Rev. D 93(2016) 025003 [1508.07161]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Barger, P

    V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,LHC Phenomenology of an Extended Standard Model with a Real Scalar Singlet,Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 035005 [0706.4311]

    work page arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Strong Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Standard Model with a Singlet

    J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin and F. Riva,Strong Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Standard Model with a Singlet,Nucl. Phys. B854(2012) 592 [1107.5441]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Higgs Self-Coupling as a Probe of Electroweak Phase Transition

    A. Noble and M. Perelstein,Higgs self-coupling as a probe of electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 063518 [0711.3018]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    Cline and K

    J.M. Cline and K. Kainulainen,Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter from a singlet Higgs,JCAP01(2013) 012 [1210.4196]

    work page arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Alanne, K

    T. Alanne, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen,Strong phase transition, dark matter and vacuum stability from simple hidden sectors,Nucl. Phys. B889(2014) 692 [1407.0688]

    work page arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Cline, K

    J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger,Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 055025 [1306.4710]

    work page arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Chiang and B.-Q

    C.-W. Chiang and B.-Q. Lu,First-order electroweak phase transition in a complex singlet model withZ 3 symmetry,JHEP07(2020) 082 [1912.12634]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Kannike, K

    K. Kannike, K. Loos and M. Raidal,Gravitational wave signals of pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in theZ 3 complex singlet model,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 035001 [1907.13136]

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Srivastava, J

    T. Srivastava, J. Das, A. Ghosh and A. Chaudhuri,Electroweak phase transition, gravitational waves and collider probes in multi-scalar dark matter scenarios,JCAP02 (2026) 032 [2507.05917]

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Chaudhuri and J

    A. Chaudhuri and J. Das,Study of entropy production due to electroweak phase transition inZ 2 symmetric extension of the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 095016 [2206.08699]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    J. Das, S. Niyogi and T. Srivastava,Revisiting Singlet Fermion Dark Matter with a Scalar Portal: Connecting Higgs Phenomenology and Strong Electroweak Phase Transition, 2601.13147

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Chakrabarty, H

    N. Chakrabarty, H. Roy and T. Srivastava,Single-step first order phase transition and gravitational waves in a SIMP dark matter scenario,Nucl. Phys. B998(2024) 116392 [2212.09659]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Camargo-Molina, R

    J.E. Camargo-Molina, R. Enberg and J. L¨ ofgren,A new perspective on the electroweak phase transition in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory,JHEP10(2021) 127 [2103.14022]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Hashino and D

    K. Hashino and D. Ueda,SMEFT effects on the gravitational wave spectrum from an electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 095022 [2210.11241]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Oikonomou and A

    V.K. Oikonomou and A. Giovanakis,Electroweak phase transition in singlet extensions of – 35 – the standard model with dimension-six operators,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 055044 [2403.01591]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Anderson and L.J

    G.W. Anderson and L.J. Hall,The Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 2685

    1992

  22. [22]

    Zhang,Operators analysis for Higgs potential and cosmological bound on Higgs mass, Phys

    X.-m. Zhang,Operators analysis for Higgs potential and cosmological bound on Higgs mass, Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 3065 [hep-ph/9301277]

    work page arXiv 1993

  23. [23]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida,Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,Phys. Lett. B174 (1986) 45

    1986

  24. [24]

    Pilaftsis,CP violation and baryogenesis due to heavy Majorana neutrinos,Phys

    A. Pilaftsis,CP violation and baryogenesis due to heavy Majorana neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D 56(1997) 5431 [hep-ph/9707235]

    work page arXiv 1997

  25. [25]

    Leptogenesis as the origin of matter

    W. Buchmuller, R.D. Peccei and T. Yanagida,Leptogenesis as the origin of matter,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55(2005) 311 [hep-ph/0502169]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  26. [26]

    Leptogenesis

    S. Davidson, E. Nardi and Y. Nir,Leptogenesis,Phys. Rept.466(2008) 105 [0802.2962]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  27. [27]

    Chakraborty, H

    I. Chakraborty, H. Roy and T. Srivastava,Searches for heavy neutrinos at multi-TeV muon collider: a resonant leptogenesis perspective,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 280 [2206.07037]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Mohanty, A

    S. Mohanty, A. Patra and T. Srivastava,MeV scale model of SIMP dark matter, neutrino mass and leptogenesis,JCAP03(2020) 027 [1908.00909]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Bhattacharya, N

    S. Bhattacharya, N. Mondal, R. Roshan and D. Vatsyayan,Leptogenesis, dark matter and gravitational waves from discrete symmetry breaking,JCAP06(2024) 029 [2312.15053]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Exploring Leptogenesis in the Era of First Order Electroweak Phase Transition

    D. Bhandari and A. Sil,Exploring Leptogenesis in the Era of First Order Electroweak Phase Transition,2504.03837

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Rubakov and M.E

    V.A. Rubakov and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Electroweak baryon number nonconservation in the early universe and in high-energy collisions,Usp. Fiz. Nauk166(1996) 493 [hep-ph/9603208]

    work page arXiv 1996

  32. [32]

    Klinkhamer and N.S

    F.R. Klinkhamer and N.S. Manton,A Saddle Point Solution in the Weinberg-Salam Theory,Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 2212

    1984

  33. [33]

    Manton,Topology in the Weinberg-Salam Theory,Phys

    N.S. Manton,Topology in the Weinberg-Salam Theory,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2019

    1983

  34. [34]

    Esteban, M.C

    I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou,The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,JHEP09(2020) 178 [2007.14792]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Gravitational Radiation from First-Order Phase Transitions

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2837 [astro-ph/9310044]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  36. [36]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J.M. No,Gravitational waves from first-order cosmological phase transitions,JHEP04(2019) 003 [1809.08242]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Croon et al.,Gravitational waves from strongly coupled phase transitions,JHEP01 (2019) 081 [1809.01441]

    D. Croon et al.,Gravitational waves from strongly coupled phase transitions,JHEP01 (2019) 081 [1809.01441]

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Beniwal et al.,Gravitational waves from electroweak phase transitions,JHEP02(2019) 183 [1803.03264]

    A. Beniwal et al.,Gravitational waves from electroweak phase transitions,JHEP02(2019) 183 [1803.03264]

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Huang et al.,Cosmological phase transition and gravitational wave signals,Phys

    F.P. Huang et al.,Cosmological phase transition and gravitational wave signals,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 043001 [1709.04843]. – 36 –

    work page arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Hashino et al.,Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions,JHEP06(2019) 088 [1809.04994]

    K. Hashino et al.,Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions,JHEP06(2019) 088 [1809.04994]

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Demidov and D

    S. Demidov and D. Gorbunov,Runaway electroweak phase transition and gravitational waves,JCAP02(2018) 055 [1712.00087]

    work page arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Review of cosmic phase transitions: their significance and experimental signatures,

    A. Mazumdar and G. White,Review of cosmological phase transitions,Rept. Prog. Phys.82 (2019) 076901 [1811.01948]

    work page arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Kobakhidze et al.,Electroweak phase transition in the standard model extension,Phys

    A. Kobakhidze et al.,Electroweak phase transition in the standard model extension,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 075021 [1607.06363]

    work page arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Kobakhidze et al.,Gravitational waves from electroweak phase transition,Phys

    A. Kobakhidze et al.,Gravitational waves from electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018) 115023 [1712.06552]

    work page arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Dev et al.,Electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational waves,Phys

    P.S.B. Dev et al.,Electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 095010 [1608.00991]. [47]LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 061102 [1602.03837]. [48]eLISAcollaboration,The Gravitational Universe,1305.5720

    work page arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO,Class

    S. Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 094011

    2011

  47. [47]

    Detecting the Cosmic Gravitational Wave Background with the Big Bang Observer

    V. Corbin and N.J. Cornish,Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Gong et al.,Descope of the ALIA mission,J

    X. Gong et al.,Descope of the ALIA mission,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.610(2015) 012011 [1410.7296]. [52]TianQincollaboration,TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 035010 [1512.02076]

    work page arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Blennow, E

    M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, A. Olivares-Del Campo, S. Pascoli, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and A.V. Titov,Neutrino Portals to Dark Matter,Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 555 [1903.00006]

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Bandyopadhyay, D

    P. Bandyopadhyay, D. Choudhury and D. Sachdeva,Semiannihilation of fermionic dark matter,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 015020 [2206.05811]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Criado, A

    J.C. Criado, A. Djouadi, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago,A complete effective field theory for dark matter,JHEP07(2021) 081 [2104.14443]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Matsumoto, S

    S. Matsumoto, S. Mukhopadhyay and Y.-L.S. Tsai,Singlet Majorana fermion dark matter: a comprehensive analysis in effective field theory,JHEP10(2014) 155 [1407.1859]

    work page arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085 [1008.4884]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010

  54. [54]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz and T. You,Top, Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Fit to the Standard Model Effective Field Theory,JHEP04(2021) 279 [2012.02779]

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Coleman and E.J

    S.R. Coleman and E.J. Weinberg,Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1888

    1973

  56. [56]

    CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields

    C.L. Wainwright,CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields,Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 2006 [1109.4189]. – 37 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  57. [57]

    Blinov, S

    N. Blinov, S. Profumo and T. Stefaniak,The Electroweak Phase Transition in the Inert Doublet Model,JCAP07(2015) 028 [1504.05949]

    work page arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    M. Aoki, T. Komatsu and H. Shibuya,Possibility of a multi-step electroweak phase transition in the two-Higgs doublet models,PTEP2022(2022) 063B05 [2106.03439]

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Chiang, Y.-T

    C.-W. Chiang, Y.-T. Li and E. Senaha,Revisiting electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a real singlet scalar,Phys. Lett. B789(2019) 154 [1808.01098]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Balazs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, G. White and Y. Zhang,How arbitrary are perturbative calculations of the electroweak phase transition?,JHEP01(2023) 050 [2208.01319]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Croon, O

    D. Croon, O. Gould, P. Schicho, T.V.I. Tenkanen and G. White,Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transitions,JHEP04(2021) 055 [2009.10080]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Gould and T.V.I

    O. Gould and T.V.I. Tenkanen,On the perturbative expansion at high temperature and implications for cosmological phase transitions,JHEP06(2021) 069 [2104.04399]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Andreassen, W

    A. Andreassen, W. Frost and M.D. Schwartz,Consistent Use of Effective Potentials,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 016009 [1408.0287]

    work page arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    Andreassen, W

    A. Andreassen, W. Frost and M.D. Schwartz,Consistent Use of the Standard Model Effective Potential,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 241801 [1408.0292]

    work page arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    Carrington,The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model,Phys

    M.E. Carrington,The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 2933

    1992

  66. [66]

    Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions

    M. Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 187–259, 1, 1999 [hep-ph/9901312]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    Biermann, C

    Anisha, L. Biermann, C. Englert and M. M¨ uhlleitner,Two Higgs doublets, effective interactions and a strong first-order electroweak phase transition,JHEP08(2022) 091 [2204.06966]

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3320

    1974

  69. [69]

    Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3357

    1974

  70. [70]

    Postma and G

    M. Postma and G. White,Cosmological phase transitions: is effective field theory just a toy?,JHEP03(2021) 280 [2012.03953]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Senaha,Symmetry Restoration and Breaking at Finite Temperature: An Introductory Review,Symmetry12(2020) 733

    E. Senaha,Symmetry Restoration and Breaking at Finite Temperature: An Introductory Review,Symmetry12(2020) 733

    2020

  72. [72]

    On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transition in the Two Higgs Doublet model

    K. Kainulainen, V. Keus, L. Niemi, K. Rummukainen, T.V.I. Tenkanen and V. Vaskonen, On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transition in the Two Higgs Doublet model,JHEP06(2019) 075 [1904.01329]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Arnold and O

    P.B. Arnold and O. Espinosa,The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 3546 [hep-ph/9212235]

    work page arXiv 1993

  74. [74]

    Resummation in a Hot Scalar Field Theory

    R.R. Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4695 [hep-ph/9204216]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1992

  75. [75]

    On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe

    L. Husdal,On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe,Galaxies4(2016) 78 [1609.04979]. – 38 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  76. [76]

    Kehayias and S

    J. Kehayias and S. Profumo,Semi-Analytic Calculation of the Gravitational Wave Signal From the Electroweak Phase Transition for General Quartic Scalar Effective Potentials, JCAP03(2010) 003 [0911.0687]

    work page arXiv 2010

  77. [77]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions

    C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,JCAP04(2016) 001 [1512.06239]. [82]DEScollaboration,Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.480(2018) 3879 [1711.00403]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Gravitational waves from bubble collisions: analytic derivation

    R. Jinno and M. Takimoto,Gravitational waves from bubble collisions: An analytic derivation,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 024009 [1605.01403]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 041301 [1304.2433]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  80. [80]

    Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe

    M. Hindmarsh,Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 071301 [1608.04735]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.