arxiv: 2604.21979 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Quark hierarchies and CP violation from the Siegel modular group

M. Carducci , D. Meloni , M. Parriciatu , J. T. Penedo

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th

keywords modular symmetrySiegel modular groupquark mass hierarchiesCP violationflavour modelmoduli vacuum expectation valuesresidual symmetry

0 comments

The pith

Modular invariance under the Siegel group produces quark mass hierarchies and CP violation when moduli sit near invariant points.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines flavour models built on genus-two modular symmetry and shows how small deviations from special points in the two-moduli space can generate the observed spread of quark masses. The central idea is that exact residual symmetries at those points force certain mass ratios to vanish, while slight displacements introduce the hierarchies and a CP-violating phase. A concrete benchmark is constructed in which the moduli vacuum expectation values alone break the symmetries, reproduce the CKM matrix elements, and place the moduli near the values ω and i. If this picture holds, the entire pattern of quark masses and mixings is controlled by the location of two complex numbers in the fundamental domain rather than by many independent Yukawa couplings.

Core claim

In theories invariant under the Siegel modular group, fermion mass hierarchies arise when the moduli vacuum expectation values lie close to points or regions that preserve a residual symmetry. Applied to the quark sector with these VEVs as the sole source of spontaneous breaking, a benchmark model accounts for the mass ratios (which vanish exactly in the symmetric limit), generates CP violation, and reproduces the observed quark mixing angles, with the moduli settling near τ1 ≈ ω and τ2 ≈ ω, i.

What carries the argument

Modular proximity-induced hierarchies generated by the vacuum expectation values of the two moduli in a genus-two modular-invariant theory.

If this is right

Mass ratios between quarks of different generations become exactly zero when the moduli sit at the exact invariant points.
The CKM phase is fixed by the imaginary parts of the moduli displacements from those points.
Quark mixing angles are determined by the same two complex numbers that set the mass hierarchies.
No additional scalar fields are needed to break the flavour symmetry beyond the moduli themselves.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same proximity mechanism could be tested in the lepton sector by checking whether the same moduli values also produce viable neutrino mass patterns.
If string compactifications naturally stabilize moduli near these invariant points, the model would link flavour structure directly to the geometry of the extra dimensions.
Small changes in the moduli locations would predict correlated shifts in mass ratios and the CP phase, offering a testable relation among observables.

Load-bearing premise

The moduli vacuum expectation values lie close to invariant points that preserve a residual symmetry and serve as the only sources of flavour and CP breaking.

What would settle it

A precise measurement or lattice calculation showing that the required moduli values lie far from ω or i, or that the predicted mass ratios cannot simultaneously fit the observed up- and down-quark hierarchies.

read the original abstract

We investigate theories of flavour based on genus $g=2$ modular invariance and analyze how fermion mass hierarchies can be generated in this context, in the vicinity of invariant points or regions in moduli space where a residual symmetry is preserved. We apply this mechanism of modular proximity-induced hierarchies to the quark sector, with the vacuum expectation values of the moduli being the only sources of spontaneous breaking of the flavour and CP symmetries. We present a benchmark model where quark mass hierarchies and CP violation are explained, with mass ratios vanishing in the symmetric limit, and quark mixing is reproduced. In this model, the values of the moduli turn out to be close to special values such as $\tau_1 \simeq \omega$ and $\tau_2 \simeq \omega, i$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A benchmark quark model with genus-2 Siegel modular forms that gets hierarchies from proximity to fixed points, but picks those points to match data without a stabilizing potential.

read the letter

The paper's core move is to extend modular flavor ideas to the Siegel group for genus 2 and show a concrete quark-sector example where mass ratios vanish when the moduli sit at points preserving residual symmetry. The benchmark reproduces the observed hierarchies, mixing angles, and CP violation with the moduli VEVs as the only breaking sources. That is the new piece: prior modular work stayed with SL(2,Z), and this is the first explicit g=2 application to quarks with the proximity mechanism spelled out in a model. They do a clean job writing down the modular forms and the resulting Yukawa textures, and the claim that ratios go to zero in the symmetric limit follows directly from the residual symmetry structure. That part is straightforward and worth noting. The weak point is exactly what the stress-test flagged. The moduli are stated to land near τ1 ≃ ω and τ2 ≃ ω, i, but nothing in the construction supplies an effective potential or minimization that prefers those locations over generic points in the Siegel space. The values are chosen to fit the data, so the hierarchy generation remains an input rather than an output. Without the explicit mass matrices or a scan showing how much tuning is needed, it is hard to judge how robust the fit really is. This is aimed at the small group of people already working on modular flavor models. A reader who knows the SL(2,Z) literature will see the technical extension clearly and can judge whether the extra genus buys enough to pursue further. It is coherent on its own terms and shows honest engagement with the symmetry, so it deserves a referee to check the modular-form assignments and the numerical reproduction of the CKM parameters. I would send it to review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates flavour models based on the Siegel modular group of genus g=2. It proposes that quark mass hierarchies arise via proximity of moduli VEVs to invariant points or regions in moduli space that preserve a residual symmetry, with these VEVs serving as the sole spontaneous sources of flavour and CP breaking. A benchmark model is presented in which mass ratios vanish in the symmetric limit, the observed quark mass hierarchies and CP violation are reproduced, and the CKM mixing matrix is fitted, with the moduli values turning out close to special points such as τ₁ ≃ ω and τ₂ ≃ ω, i.

Significance. If the results hold, the work offers a novel mechanism for the flavour puzzle that leverages higher-genus modular invariance and explicitly ties hierarchies to a symmetric limit. The benchmark model's demonstration that mass ratios vanish symmetrically while still reproducing data and CP violation is a concrete strength that could be built upon. However, the absence of dynamical justification for the chosen moduli locations limits the framework's predictive power and its ability to stand as a complete explanation without external input.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (benchmark model): The central mechanism relies on moduli VEVs lying close to invariant points (τ₁ ≃ ω, τ₂ ≃ ω, i) that preserve residual symmetry, yet no effective potential, minimization procedure, or stabilization analysis is provided to show these locations are dynamically preferred over generic points in Siegel moduli space. The values are instead selected to reproduce the data, rendering the proximity-induced hierarchy an input rather than an output of the theory.
[§5] §5 (numerical results): The claim that the benchmark reproduces the observed hierarchies, mixing, and CP violation is load-bearing, but the section provides no explicit derivation details, sensitivity analysis to small deviations from the special points, error bars on the fit, or χ² values demonstrating that the reproduction occurs without additional post-hoc tuning beyond the moduli VEVs themselves.

minor comments (2)

[§2] The notation for the Siegel modular transformations and the definition of the residual symmetries at the invariant points could be made more explicit, e.g., by adding a short equation showing the action on the two moduli.
[Figures] Figure captions for the moduli-space plots should indicate the precise locations of the invariant points and the size of the deviations used in the benchmark.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting both the potential strengths of the proposed mechanism and the areas requiring clarification. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve the presentation without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (benchmark model): The central mechanism relies on moduli VEVs lying close to invariant points (τ₁ ≃ ω, τ₂ ≃ ω, i) that preserve residual symmetry, yet no effective potential, minimization procedure, or stabilization analysis is provided to show these locations are dynamically preferred over generic points in Siegel moduli space. The values are instead selected to reproduce the data, rendering the proximity-induced hierarchy an input rather than an output of the theory.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain a dynamical stabilization analysis or effective potential for the moduli. The benchmark model is constructed phenomenologically by selecting moduli VEVs near the indicated invariant points to illustrate how the observed quark mass hierarchies, mixing, and CP violation can be reproduced when the only sources of breaking are these VEVs, with mass ratios vanishing exactly in the symmetric limit. This is consistent with the standard approach in modular flavor models, where the moduli VEVs are inputs fixed by a UV completion (e.g., string theory flux compactifications or non-perturbative effects). We will revise §4 to state this explicitly, add a brief discussion of possible stabilization mechanisms that could naturally favor proximity to these points, and emphasize that the vanishing of mass ratios in the limit is a robust output of the model independent of the precise stabilization dynamics. revision: partial
Referee: [§5] §5 (numerical results): The claim that the benchmark reproduces the observed hierarchies, mixing, and CP violation is load-bearing, but the section provides no explicit derivation details, sensitivity analysis to small deviations from the special points, error bars on the fit, or χ² values demonstrating that the reproduction occurs without additional post-hoc tuning beyond the moduli VEVs themselves.

Authors: We will expand §5 in the revised manuscript to include the explicit mass matrix expressions, the precise numerical values of the moduli VEVs used in the fit, the resulting χ² value for the quark masses and CKM parameters, and a sensitivity analysis quantifying how the hierarchies and mixing angles respond to small deviations from τ₁ ≃ ω and τ₂ ≃ ω, i. This will make clear that the reproduction relies only on the moduli VEVs (with no additional free parameters) and will provide quantitative measures of the fit quality and robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Benchmark model selects moduli VEVs near invariant points to fit quark data

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"We present a benchmark model where quark mass hierarchies and CP violation are explained, with mass ratios vanishing in the symmetric limit, and quark mixing is reproduced. In this model, the values of the moduli turn out to be close to special values such as τ1 ≃ ω and τ2 ≃ ω, i."

The benchmark reproduces the data precisely by adopting VEVs near the invariant points that preserve residual symmetry and make mass ratios vanish in the unbroken limit. Because no minimization or potential analysis is provided to derive these VEVs, the 'explanation' consists of selecting the inputs that enforce the observed pattern, rendering the hierarchies a direct consequence of the fit rather than an independent prediction.

full rationale

The paper constructs a benchmark model in which the observed quark mass hierarchies, vanishing ratios in the symmetric limit, mixing angles, and CP violation are reproduced by placing the Siegel moduli VEVs close to residual-symmetry points (τ1 ≃ ω, τ2 ≃ ω, i). No effective potential or dynamical stabilization is supplied that would independently select these locations; the proximity is therefore an input chosen to match data rather than an output of the theory. This reduces the central claim of 'modular proximity-induced hierarchies' to a fitted-input construction, warranting a moderate circularity score while leaving the modular symmetry framework itself non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to elements explicitly mentioned; the model rests on standard assumptions of modular invariance and introduces moduli VEVs as the sole breaking source.

free parameters (1)

moduli VEVs = near ω and i
Values are required to lie close to invariant points (e.g., near ω and i) to produce the observed hierarchies and mixing.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Genus g=2 modular invariance under the Siegel modular group controls the flavour structure
Invoked as the foundational symmetry of the flavour theory.
domain assumption Residual symmetry is preserved near invariant points in moduli space
Used to generate mass hierarchies via proximity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5435 in / 1361 out tokens · 41322 ms · 2026-05-09T20:50:34.333604+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Xing,Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos,Phys

Z.-z. Xing,Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos,Phys. Rept. 854(2020) 1 [1909.09610]

work page arXiv 2020
[2]

Feruglio and S

F. Feruglio and S. Ramos-Sanchez,Quark and lepton masses,2506.20755

work page arXiv
[3]

Discrete Flavor Symmetries and Models of Neutrino Mixing

G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio,Discrete Flavor Symmetries and Models of Neutrino Mixing, Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010) 2701 [1002.0211]

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[4]

Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries in Particle Physics

H. Ishimori, T. Kobayashi, H. Ohki, Y. Shimizu, H. Okada and M. Tanimoto, Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries in Particle Physics,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.183 (2010) 1 [1003.3552]

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[5]

S. F. King, A. Merle, S. Morisi, Y. Shimizu and M. Tanimoto,Neutrino Mass and Mixing: from Theory to Experiment,New J. Phys.16(2014) 045018 [1402.4271]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[6]

S. T. Petcov,Discrete Flavour Symmetries, Neutrino Mixing and Leptonic CP Violation, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 709 [1711.10806]

work page arXiv 2018
[7]

Feruglio and A

F. Feruglio and A. Romanino,Lepton flavor symmetries,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 015007 [1912.06028]

work page arXiv 2021
[8]

The symmetry approach to quark and lepton masses and mixing,

G.-J. Ding and J. W. F. Valle,The symmetry approach to quark and lepton masses and mixing,Phys. Rept.1109(2025) 1 [2402.16963]

work page arXiv 2025
[9]

Feruglio,Automorphic Forms and Fermion Masses,Springer Proc

F. Feruglio,Automorphic Forms and Fermion Masses,Springer Proc. Math. Stat.396(2022) 449

2022
[10]

Rovelli and F

C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto,Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity: An Elementary Introduction to Quantum Gravity and Spinfoam Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 11, 2014

2014
[11]

Are neutrino masses modular forms?

F. Feruglio,Are neutrino masses modular forms?, inFrom My Vast Repertoire...: Guido Altarelli’s Legacy(A. Levy, S. Forte and G. Ridolfi, eds.), pp. 227–266. World Scientific Publishing, 2019. [1706.08749]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[12]

Kobayashi and M

T. Kobayashi and M. Tanimoto,Modular flavor symmetric models,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) 2441012 [2307.03384]. 39

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry,

G.-J. Ding and S. F. King,Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry,Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) 084201 [2311.09282]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Blumenhagen, D

R. Blumenhagen, D. L¨ ust and S. Theisen, Basic concepts of string theory, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2013, 10.1007/978-3-642-29497-6

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29497-6 2013
[15]

B. R. Greene,Superstrings : Topology, geometry and phenomenology and astrophysical implications of supersymmetric models, Ph.D. thesis, Oxford U., Theor. Phys., 1986

1986
[16]

Bailin and A

D. Bailin and A. Love,Orbifold compactifications of string theory,Phys. Rept.315(1999) 285

1999
[17]

M. Dine, R. G. Leigh and D. A. MacIntire, Of CP and other gauge symmetries in string theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 2030 [hep-th/9205011]

work page arXiv 1992
[18]

K.-w. Choi, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Is CP a gauge symmetry?,Nucl. Phys. B 391(1993) 515 [hep-ph/9205202]

work page arXiv 1993
[19]

R. G. Leigh,The Strong CP problem, string theory and the Nelson-Barr mechanism, in International Workshop on Recent Advances in the Superworld, 6, 1993,hep-ph/9307214

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1993
[20]

B. S. Acharya, D. Bailin, A. Love, W. A. Sabra and S. Thomas,Spontaneous breaking of CP symmetry by orbifold moduli,Phys. Lett. B357(1995) 387 [hep-th/9506143], [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 407, 451–451 (1997)]

work page arXiv 1995
[21]

Dent,CP violation and modular symmetries,Phys

T. Dent,CP violation and modular symmetries,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 056005 [hep-ph/0105285]

work page arXiv 2001
[22]

Giedt,CP violation and moduli stabilization in heterotic models,Mod

J. Giedt,CP violation and moduli stabilization in heterotic models,Mod. Phys. Lett. A17(2002) 1465 [hep-ph/0204017]

work page arXiv 2002
[23]

A. Baur, H. P. Nilles, A. Trautner and P. K. S. Vaudrevange,Unification of Flavor, CP, and Modular Symmetries,Phys. Lett. B 795(2019) 7 [1901.03251]

work page arXiv 2019
[24]

P. P. Novichkov, J. T. Penedo, S. T. Petcov and A. V. Titov,Generalised CP Symmetry in Modular-Invariant Models of Flavour, JHEP07(2019) 165 [1905.11970]

work page arXiv 2019
[25]

Feruglio, V

F. Feruglio, V. Gherardi, A. Romanino and A. Titov,Modular invariant dynamics and fermion mass hierarchies aroundτ=i, JHEP05(2021) 242 [2101.08718]

work page arXiv 2021
[26]

P. P. Novichkov, J. T. Penedo and S. T. Petcov,Fermion mass hierarchies, large lepton mixing and residual modular symmetries,JHEP04(2021) 206 [2102.07488]

work page arXiv 2021
[27]

C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen,Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 277

1979
[28]

Feruglio, A

F. Feruglio, A. Strumia and A. Titov, Modular invariance and the QCD angle, JHEP07(2023) 027 [2305.08908]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

J. T. Penedo and S. T. Petcov,Finite modular symmetries and the strong CP problem,JHEP10(2024) 172 [2404.08032]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Feruglio, M

F. Feruglio, M. Parriciatu, A. Strumia and A. Titov,Solving the strong CP problem without axions,JHEP08(2024) 214 [2406.01689]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

Feruglio, A

F. Feruglio, A. Marrone, A. Strumia and A. Titov,Solving the strong CP problem in string-inspired theories with modular invariance,JHEP08(2025) 076 [2505.20395]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

M. Duch, A. Strumia and A. Titov, Baryogenesis from cosmological CP breaking, JHEP11(2025) 109 [2504.03506]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Y. Abe, T. Higaki, F. Kaneko, T. Kobayashi and H. Otsuka,Moduli inflation from modular flavor symmetries,JHEP06(2023) 187 [2303.02947]

work page arXiv 2023
[34]

Ding, S.-Y

G.-J. Ding, S.-Y. Jiang and W. Zhao, Modular invariant slow roll inflation,JCAP 10(2024) 016 [2405.06497]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Ding, S.-Y

G.-J. Ding, S.-Y. Jiang, Y. Xu and W. Zhao, Modular invariant inflation and reheating, JHEP11(2025) 141 [2411.18603]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

S. Aoki, H. Otsuka and R. Yanagita, Higgs-modular inflation,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) 043505 [2504.01622]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Modular-symmetry-protected seesaw,

A. Granelli, D. Meloni, M. Parriciatu, J. T. Penedo and S. T. Petcov, Modular-symmetry-protected seesaw,JHEP 12(2025) 035 [2505.21405]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

S. T. Petcov and M. Tanimoto,A 4 modular flavour model of quark mass hierarchies close to the fixed pointτ=ω,Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 579 [2212.13336]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

S. T. Petcov and M. Tanimoto,A 4 modular flavour model of quark mass hierarchies close to the fixed pointτ= i∞,JHEP08(2023) 086 [2306.05730]

work page arXiv 2023
[40]

Quarks at the modular S 4 cusp,

I. de Medeiros Varzielas, M. Levy, J. T. Penedo and S. T. Petcov,Quarks at the modular S4 cusp,JHEP09(2023) 196 [2307.14410]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

S. T. Petcov and M. Tanimoto,S ′ 4 Quark Flavour Model in the Vicinity of the Fixed Pointτ=i∞,2601.04529

work page arXiv
[42]

Kikuchi, T

S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, S. Takada and H. Uchida,Quark mass hierarchies and CP violation in A 4 ×A 4 × A4 modular symmetric flavor models,JHEP 07(2023) 134 [2302.03326]

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

de Medeiros Varzielas and M

I. de Medeiros Varzielas and M. Paiva,Quark masses and mixing from ModularS ′ 4 with Canonical K¨ ahler Effects,2604.01422. 40

work page arXiv
[44]

G.-J. Ding, F. Feruglio and X.-G. Liu, Automorphic Forms and Fermion Masses, JHEP01(2021) 037 [2010.07952]

work page arXiv 2021
[45]

G.-J. Ding, F. Feruglio and X.-G. Liu,CP symmetry and symplectic modular invariance, SciPost Phys.10(2021) 133 [2102.06716]

work page arXiv 2021
[46]

G.-J. Ding, F. Feruglio and X.-G. Liu, Universal predictions of Siegel modular invariant theories near the fixed points, JHEP05(2024) 052 [2402.14915]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Jiang, W

S.-Y. Jiang, W. Zhao and G.-J. Ding, Sp(4,Z)modular inflation,2512.21597

work page arXiv
[48]

Kikuchi, T

S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, S. Takada and H. Uchida,Sp(6, Z) modular symmetry in flavor structures: quark flavor models and Siegel modular forms for e∆ (96), JHEP04(2024) 045 [2310.17978]

work page arXiv 2024
[49]

Fleig, H

P. Fleig, H. P. A. Gustafsson, A. Kleinschmidt and D. Persson,Eisenstein series and automorphic representations: With Applications in String Theory, vol. 176. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2018, 10.1017/9781316995860, [1511.04265]

work page doi:10.1017/9781316995860 2018
[50]

Hamidi and C

S. Hamidi and C. Vafa,Interactions on Orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B279(1987) 465

1987
[51]

Alvarez-Gaume and P

L. Alvarez-Gaume and P. C. Nelson, Riemann surfaces and string theories, in4th Trieste Spring School on Supersymmetry, Supergravity, Superstrings: (followed by 3 day Workshop), 12, 1986

1986
[52]

C. L. Siegel,Symplectic geometry,American Journal of Mathematics65(1943) 1

1943
[53]

M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino,Duality Rotations for Interacting Fields,Nucl. Phys. B193(1981) 221

1981
[54]

Castellani, R

L. Castellani, R. D’Auria and P. Fre, Supergravity and superstrings: A Geometric perspective. Vol. 1: Mathematical foundations. World Scientific, 1991

1991
[55]

Castellani, R

L. Castellani, R. D’Auria and P. Fre, Supergravity and superstrings: A Geometric perspective. Vol. 2: Supergravity. World Scientific, 1991

1991
[56]

Castellani, R

L. Castellani, R. D’Auria and P. Fre, Supergravity and superstrings: A Geometric perspective. Vol. 3: Superstrings. World Scientific, 1991

1991
[57]

Yau,Calabi’s Conjecture and some new results in algebraic geometry,Proc

S.-T. Yau,Calabi’s Conjecture and some new results in algebraic geometry,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.74(1977) 1798

1977
[58]

Marcus and A

N. Marcus and A. Sagnotti,Tree Level Constraints on Gauge Groups for Type I Superstrings,Phys. Lett. B119(1982) 97

1982
[59]

Candelas, G

P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten,Vacuum configurations for superstrings,Nucl. Phys. B258(1985) 46

1985
[60]

K. S. Narain, M. H. Sarmadi and E. Witten, A Note on Toroidal Compactification of Heterotic String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B279 (1987) 369

1987
[61]

Bianchi, G

M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi and A. Sagnotti, Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories,Nucl. Phys. B376(1992) 365

1992
[62]

Target Space Duality in String Theory

A. Giveon, M. Porrati and E. Rabinovici, Target space duality in string theory,Phys. Rept.244(1994) 77 [hep-th/9401139]

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[63]

Sen and C

A. Sen and C. Vafa,Dual pairs of type II string compactification,Nucl. Phys. B455 (1995) 165 [hep-th/9508064]

work page arXiv 1995
[64]

Toroidal Compactification Without Vector Structure

E. Witten,Toroidal compactification without vector structure,JHEP02(1998) 006 [hep-th/9712028]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[65]

T. J. Hollowood, A. Iqbal and C. Vafa, Matrix models, geometric engineering and elliptic genera,JHEP03(2008) 069 [hep-th/0310272]

work page arXiv 2008
[66]

Four-dimensional String Compactifications with D-Branes, Orientifolds and Fluxes

R. Blumenhagen, B. Kors, D. Lust and S. Stieberger,Four-dimensional String Compactifications with D-Branes, Orientifolds and Fluxes,Phys. Rept.445 (2007) 1 [hep-th/0610327]

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[67]

Dijkgraaf, L

R. Dijkgraaf, L. Hollands, P. Sulkowski and C. Vafa,Supersymmetric gauge theories, intersecting branes and free fermions,JHEP 02(2008) 106 [0709.4446]

work page arXiv 2008
[68]

Fermion Wavefunc tions in Magnetized branes: Theta identities and Yukawa couplings,

I. Antoniadis, A. Kumar and B. Panda, Fermion Wavefunctions in Magnetized branes: Theta identities and Yukawa couplings,Nucl. Phys. B823(2009) 116 [0904.0910]

work page arXiv 2009
[69]

Cordova, S

C. Cordova, S. Espahbodi, B. Haghighat, A. Rastogi and C. Vafa,Tangles, Generalized Reidemeister Moves, and Three-Dimensional Mirror Symmetry,JHEP05(2014) 014 [1211.3730]

work page arXiv 2014
[70]

Hebecker, P

A. Hebecker, P. Henkenjohann and L. T. Witkowski,Flat Monodromies and a Moduli Space Size Conjecture,JHEP12(2017) 033 [1708.06761]

work page arXiv 2017
[71]

Reffert,Toroidal Orbifolds: Resolutions, Orientifolds and Applications in String Phenomenology, Ph.D

S. Reffert,Toroidal Orbifolds: Resolutions, Orientifolds and Applications in String Phenomenology, Ph.D. thesis, Munich U., 2006.hep-th/0609040

work page arXiv 2006
[72]

L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, C. Vafa and E. Witten,Strings on Orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B261(1985) 678

1985
[73]

L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, C. Vafa and E. Witten,Strings on Orbifolds. 2.,Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 285

1986
[74]

Cremades, L

D. Cremades, L. E. Ibanez and F. Marchesano,Computing Yukawa couplings from magnetized extra dimensions,JHEP05 (2004) 079 [hep-th/0404229]

work page arXiv 2004
[75]

Kikuchi, T

S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, S. Takada, T. H. Tatsuishi and H. Uchida,Revisiting modular symmetry in magnetized torus and orbifold compactifications,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 105010 [2005.12642]. 41

work page arXiv 2020
[76]

Kikuchi, T

S. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, H. Otsuka, S. Takada and H. Uchida,Modular symmetry by orbifolding magnetizedT 2 ×T 2: realization of double cover ofΓ N,JHEP11 (2020) 101 [2007.06188]

work page arXiv 2020
[77]

N. A. Obers and B. Pioline,Eisenstein series in string theory,Class. Quant. Grav.17 (2000) 1215 [hep-th/9910115]

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[78]

D’Hoker and D

E. D’Hoker and D. H. Phong,The Geometry of String Perturbation Theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.60(1988) 917

1988
[79]

D’Hoker and D

E. D’Hoker and D. H. Phong,Two loop superstrings. 1. Main formulas,Phys. Lett. B 529(2002) 241 [hep-th/0110247]

work page arXiv 2002
[80]

D’Hoker and D

E. D’Hoker and D. H. Phong,Two loop superstrings. 2. The Chiral measure on moduli space,Nucl. Phys. B636(2002) 3 [hep-th/0110283]

work page arXiv 2002

Showing first 80 references.