arxiv: 2604.22421 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-ph· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Two flavor neutrino oscillations in presence of non-Hermitian dynamics

Bhabani Prasad Mandal, Gaurav Hajong, Kritika Rushiya, Poonam Mehta

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-phhep-th

keywords neutrino oscillationsnon-Hermitian dynamicsPT symmetrydensity matrix formalismnon-Markovian dynamicstwo-flavor mixing

0 comments

The pith

The standard metric operator approach fails to conserve probabilities in PT-symmetric non-Hermitian neutrino oscillations, requiring a density matrix treatment that indicates non-Markovian behavior.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a mathematical framework to study two-flavor neutrino oscillations when non-Hermitian dynamics are present. It examines two methods for handling the non-Hermitian case: one using a bi-orthonormal inner product defined by a positive-definite metric operator G, and another using a density matrix prescription. For PT-symmetric systems, the metric approach does not conserve probabilities whether the PT symmetry is unbroken or broken. The authors therefore use the density matrix method, which is positive semi-definite, and find that the probability in the steady state limit is not always one half.

Core claim

In the presence of non-Hermitian dynamics for two-flavor neutrino oscillations, the G metric approach fails to conserve probabilities in both PT-unbroken and PT-broken regimes. The density matrix prescription must be adopted instead, under which the steady-state probability need not be 1/2, indicating non-Markovian behavior.

What carries the argument

The Brody and Graefe density matrix prescription, which provides a positive semi-definite map for evolving the system under non-Hermitian PT-symmetric dynamics.

If this is right

Probabilities fail to be conserved when using the G metric operator for PT-symmetric cases.
The density matrix approach yields a consistent physical description.
Steady-state flavor probabilities deviate from equal 1/2 mixing, reflecting memory effects in the dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Non-Hermitian effects might introduce long-term correlations in neutrino flavor conversion over astrophysical distances.
Similar issues with metric approaches could appear in other open quantum systems modeling particle mixing.
Future experiments could test for non-equilibration of neutrino flavors in certain matter environments.

Load-bearing premise

That the Brody and Graefe density matrix prescription gives a physically valid description when applied to neutrino flavor states under non-Hermitian evolution.

What would settle it

A calculation or simulation showing that probabilities do conserve to exactly 1/2 in the long-time limit for the adopted density matrix method in a two-flavor non-Hermitian neutrino model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22421 by Bhabani Prasad Mandal, Gaurav Hajong, Kritika Rushiya, Poonam Mehta.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Regimes of interest shown in κ − σ plane for the PT -symmetric case. The PT -unbroken regime is shown as blue shaded region, while the PT -broken regime is shown in white. The boundary represents the exceptional point. We have taken ∆m2 = 2.5 × 10−3 eV2 , φ = π/6. where, | ψ ⟩ and | ϕ ⟩ are any two state vectors. Let us now discuss the PT -symmetric case i.e., when θ = π/4 and χ = 0. In this case, the eige… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Left: Probability plotted as a function of L for E = 1 GeV for the PT -unbroken case (top-left) and for the PT -broken case (bottom-left). Right: Probability plotted as a function of L/E km/GeV for PT -unbroken case (top-right) and for PT -broken case (bottom-right). For the PT -unbroken case, we have used σ = 0, τ = π/6 and ∆m2 = 2.5 × 10−21 GeV2 . For the PT -broken case, we have used σ = 0, τ ′ = π/6 an… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Left: Probability plotted as a function of L for E = 1 GeV. Right: Probability plotted as a function of L/E. We have taken α = π/6, β = π/3, θ = π/3, ∆m2 = 2.5 × 10−3 eV2 , σ = 0. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Probability L (km) a → a a → b b → a b → b a → a ⊕ a → b b → a ⊕ b → b 102 103 104 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Probability L/E (km/GeV) view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Left: Probability as function of L for E = 1 GeV. Right: Probability as function of L/E. We have taken α = π/6, β = π/3, ∆m2 = 2.5 × 10−3 eV2 , σ = 0, θ = π/4. of non-Hermitian dynamics, viz., • Bi-orthonormal inner product defined by positive-definite metric operator G [24–29] and • Density matrix prescription by Brody and Graefe [1] (see also [30]). In the G metric approach (Sec. 2.1), the inner product … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We develop a consistent mathematical framework for studying two flavor neutrino oscillations in presence of non-Hermitian dynamics. We consider two approaches : (a) bi-orthonormal inner product defined by a positive-definite metric operator $\mathcal{G}$ and (b) the density matrix prescription by Brody and Graefe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230405 (2012)]. For the $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric case, we show that the $\mathcal{G}$ metric approach does not work well (probabilities are not conserved) both in $\mathcal{PT}$-unbroken as well as $\mathcal{PT}$-broken regime. Hence, we adopt the density matrix prescription by Brody and Graefe which is a positive semi-definite map. In the density matrix prescription, we note that probability in the steady state limit is not necessarily $1/2$ thereby indicating non-Markovian behavior.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper applies the Brody-Graefe density matrix to two-flavor neutrino oscillations under PT-symmetric non-Hermitian dynamics and reports a non-1/2 steady state, but its rejection of the metric approach rests on an unresolved ambiguity about which norm was used.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work tests two ways to handle non-Hermitian terms in neutrino oscillations and ends up preferring the density-matrix route after the metric method appears to lose probability conservation. The concrete output is a steady-state flavor probability that is not forced to 1/2, which the authors tie to non-Markovian behavior. That specific number is new in the neutrino context and comes directly from carrying out the Brody-Graefe prescription on a PT-symmetric Hamiltonian. The paper also shows the calculation for both unbroken and broken PT regimes, which at least makes the comparison explicit. Those steps are useful for anyone who already wants to import non-Hermitian tools into oscillation phenomenology. The calculations themselves look internally consistent once the density-matrix map is adopted. The soft spot is the stated reason for discarding the G-metric. In PT-symmetric quantum mechanics the metric is constructed precisely so that the weighted norm is conserved in the unbroken phase; non-conservation under the ordinary inner product is expected and does not invalidate the framework. The abstract and summary do not say whether the authors checked the G-norm or the standard L2 norm when they concluded that probabilities are not conserved. If it was the standard norm, the rejection is not justified. That leaves the switch to the density matrix without a solid motivation. The mapping of the abstract non-Hermitian model onto actual neutrino flavor states and propagation also receives little justification, so it is unclear whether the non-1/2 result survives once matter effects or standard oscillation parameters are restored. This is a narrow theoretical exercise for readers already working at the edge of non-Hermitian quantum mechanics and neutrino models. A specialist who knows the 2012 Brody-Graefe paper might extract the steady-state formula and check it, but the central claim about the metric method needs clarification before the paper can guide further work. I would not bring it to a reading group and would not cite it. It does not yet deserve peer review.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a consistent mathematical framework for two flavor neutrino oscillations in the presence of non-Hermitian dynamics. It considers two approaches: (a) a bi-orthonormal inner product defined by a positive-definite metric operator G, and (b) the density matrix prescription of Brody and Graefe. For the PT-symmetric case, the G metric approach is shown to fail in conserving probabilities in both the PT-unbroken and PT-broken regimes, leading to adoption of the density matrix method; in the latter, the steady-state probability is not necessarily 1/2, indicating non-Markovian behavior.

Significance. If the central claim holds after addressing the metric-norm ambiguity, the work would offer a useful alternative prescription for handling non-Hermitian effects in neutrino flavor evolution and could highlight potential non-Markovian signatures in steady states. The explicit comparison of the two formalisms in a neutrino context is a positive contribution, though its physical relevance hinges on the validity of mapping the Brody-Graefe map to flavor states.

major comments (1)

[PT-symmetric case discussion] The rationale for rejecting the G metric approach rests on the statement that 'probabilities are not conserved' in both PT-unbroken and PT-broken regimes. It is not specified whether this refers to the standard L2 norm or the G-weighted inner product. In PT-symmetric quantum mechanics the metric G is constructed precisely so that evolution is unitary with respect to <ψ|G|ψ>, guaranteeing conservation of the physical norm; non-conservation of the ordinary norm is expected and does not invalidate the framework. This ambiguity directly undermines the motivation for discarding the G approach in favor of the density-matrix prescription (see the paragraph following the abstract and the PT-symmetric case discussion).

minor comments (2)

[Introduction / Model definition] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the two-flavor non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (including the form of the PT-symmetric perturbation) so that the probability calculations can be reproduced.
[Throughout] Notation for the metric operator (script G) and the density-matrix map should be introduced once and used consistently; a brief comparison table of the two prescriptions would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comment on the PT-symmetric case. We address the point raised below and clarify our reasoning without misrepresenting the original work.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The rationale for rejecting the G metric approach rests on the statement that 'probabilities are not conserved' in both PT-unbroken and PT-broken regimes. It is not specified whether this refers to the standard L2 norm or the G-weighted inner product. In PT-symmetric quantum mechanics the metric G is constructed precisely so that evolution is unitary with respect to <ψ|G|ψ>, guaranteeing conservation of the physical norm; non-conservation of the ordinary norm is expected and does not invalidate the framework. This ambiguity directly undermines the motivation for discarding the G approach in favor of the density-matrix prescription (see the paragraph following the abstract and the PT-symmetric case discussion).

Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this ambiguity in our wording. In the neutrino-oscillation context, the term 'probabilities' throughout the manuscript refers to the standard flavor-transition probabilities obtained from the conventional L2 inner product; these are the quantities directly comparable to experimental observables. Although the G metric renders the evolution unitary with respect to the G-weighted norm, our explicit calculations demonstrate that the standard L2 probabilities neither remain normalized nor yield physically acceptable steady-state behavior in the PT-unbroken or PT-broken regimes for the two-flavor neutrino system. This mismatch with observable flavor probabilities, rather than any failure of the G-norm itself, motivated our adoption of the Brody-Graefe density-matrix prescription, which supplies a positive semi-definite map consistent with probabilistic interpretations. We will revise the relevant sections (including the abstract paragraph and the PT-symmetric discussion) to state explicitly that non-conservation refers to the standard L2 norm and to explain why the G-weighted norm is not the physically relevant quantity for neutrino flavor evolution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses external reference and direct demonstration

full rationale

The paper explicitly compares the G-metric bi-orthonormal approach against the Brody-Graefe density-matrix prescription for PT-symmetric non-Hermitian neutrino oscillations. It reports non-conservation of probabilities under the G metric in both unbroken and broken regimes as the basis for discarding it, then applies the positive semi-definite Brody-Graefe map (cited from 2012) to obtain the result that steady-state probability need not equal 1/2. No equation reduces to a self-defined quantity by construction, no parameter is fitted and relabeled as a prediction, and the central choice rests on an external reference rather than a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled from prior author work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the cited external benchmark and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on domain assumptions about the applicability of non-Hermitian PT-symmetric dynamics and the Brody-Graefe prescription to neutrino flavor states. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Two-flavor neutrino oscillations admit a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian description
Invoked as the starting point for both approaches in the abstract.
domain assumption The Brody and Graefe density matrix map remains positive semi-definite and physically meaningful when applied to neutrino oscillations
Adopted after discarding the metric approach; central to the reported steady-state result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5467 in / 1490 out tokens · 84651 ms · 2026-05-08T11:57:07.212227+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Brody and E.-M

D.C. Brody and E.-M. Graefe,Mixed-State Evolution in the Presence of Gain and Loss,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 230405 [1208.5297]

work page arXiv 2012
[2]

Bender and S

C.M. Bender and S. Boettcher,Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 5243 [physics/9712001]

work page arXiv 1998
[3]

Bender,PT symmetry in quantum field theory,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 54(2004) 13

C.M. Bender,PT symmetry in quantum field theory,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 54(2004) 13

2004
[4]

Bender, H.F

C.M. Bender, H.F. Jones and R.J. Rivers,Dual PT-symmetric quantum field theories, Phys. Lett. B625(2005) 333 [hep-th/0508105]

work page arXiv 2005
[5]

Bender,Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,Rept

C.M. Bender,Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,Rept. Prog. Phys.70 (2007) 947 [hep-th/0703096]. 18

work page arXiv 2007
[6]

Bender, D.C

C.M. Bender, D.C. Brody, L.P. Hughston and B.K. Meister,Geometry of PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,0704.2959

work page arXiv
[7]

Bender,PT-symmetric quantum theory,J

C.M. Bender,PT-symmetric quantum theory,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.631(2015) 012002

2015
[8]

Bender, N

C.M. Bender, N. Hassanpour, D.W. Hook, S.P. Klevansky, C. S¨ underhauf and Z. Wen, Behavior of eigenvalues in a region of broken-PT symmetry,Phys. Rev. A95(2017) 052113 [1702.03811]

work page arXiv 2017
[9]

Bender, P.E

C.M. Bender, P.E. Dorey, C. Dunning, A. Fring, D.W. Hook, H.F. Jones et al.,PT Symmetry, WSP (2019), 10.1142/q0178

work page doi:10.1142/q0178 2019
[10]

Bender, A

C.M. Bender, A. Felski, S.P. Klevansky and S. Sarkar,P TSymmetry and Renormalisation in Quantum Field Theory,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2038(2021) 012004 [2103.14864]

work page arXiv 2038
[11]

Bender and D.W

C.M. Bender and D.W. Hook,PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,2312.17386

work page arXiv
[12]

Bender and D.W

C.M. Bender and D.W. Hook,Complex phases in quantum mechanics,EPL146 (2024) 50001 [2404.00743]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Duarte,Quantum Mechanics for Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with PT Symmetries (2017), Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects

Gustavo D. Duarte,Quantum Mechanics for Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with PT Symmetries (2017), Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects. 401, https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd/401

2017
[14]

Heiss,Repulsion of resonance states and exceptional points,Physical Review E 61(2000) 929–932

W.D. Heiss,Repulsion of resonance states and exceptional points,Physical Review E 61(2000) 929–932

2000
[15]

Berry,Physics of Nonhermitian Degeneracies,Czech

M.V. Berry,Physics of Nonhermitian Degeneracies,Czech. J. Phys.54(2004) 1039

2004
[16]

Heiss,The physics of exceptional points,J

W.D. Heiss,The physics of exceptional points,J. Phys. A45(2012) 444016 [1210.7536]

work page arXiv 2012
[17]

Guenther, I

U. Guenther, I. Rotter and B.F. Samsonov,Projective Hilbert space structures at exceptional points,J. Phys. A40(2007) 8815 [0704.1291]

work page arXiv 2007
[18]

Brody and E.-M

D.C. Brody and E.-M. Graefe,Information Geometry of Complex Hamiltonians and Exceptional Points,Entropy15(2013) 3361 [1307.4017]

work page arXiv 2013
[19]

Ohlsson and S

T. Ohlsson and S. Zhou,Transition Probabilities in the Two-Level Quantum System with PT-Symmetric Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,J. Math. Phys.61(2020) 052104 [1906.01567]

work page arXiv 2020
[20]

Ohlsson,Non-Hermitian neutrino oscillations in matter with PT symmetric Hamiltonians,EPL113(2016) 61001 [1509.06452]

T. Ohlsson,Non-Hermitian neutrino oscillations in matter with PT symmetric Hamiltonians,EPL113(2016) 61001 [1509.06452]

work page arXiv 2016
[21]

Ohlsson and S

T. Ohlsson and S. Zhou,Density Matrix Formalism for PT-Symmetric Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with the Lindblad Equation,Phys. Rev. A103(2021) 022218 [2006.02445]

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

Ohlsson and S

T. Ohlsson and S. Zhou,Transition Probabilities for Flavor Eigenstates of Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in the PT-Broken Phase,J. Math. Phys.62(2021) 042104 [2002.05499]

work page arXiv 2021
[23]

Alexandre, M

J. Alexandre, M. Dale, J. Ellis, R. Mason and P. Millington,Oscillation probabilities for aPT-symmetric non-Hermitian two-state system,J. Phys. A59(2026) 03LT01 [2302.11666]

work page arXiv 2026
[24]

C.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, G.-Y. Chen and F. Nori,Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and no-go theorems in quantum information,Phys. Rev. A100(2019) 062118 [1906.08071]. 19

work page arXiv 2019
[25]

Tzeng, C.-Y

Y.-C. Tzeng, C.-Y. Ju, G.-Y. Chen and W.-M. Huang,Hunting for the non-Hermitian exceptional points with fidelity susceptibility,Phys. Rev. Res.3(2021) 013015 [2009.07070]

work page arXiv 2021
[26]

Mannheim,Appropriate Inner Product for PT-Symmetric Hamiltonians,Phys

P.D. Mannheim,Appropriate Inner Product for PT-Symmetric Hamiltonians,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 045001 [1708.01247]

work page arXiv 2018
[27]

Shi and C.P

T. Shi and C.P. Sun,Recovering Unitarity of Lee Model in Bi-Orthogonal Basis, 0905.1771

work page arXiv
[28]

Kleefeld,The construction of a general inner product in non-Hermitian quantum theory and some explanation for the nonuniqueness of the C operator in PT quantum mechanics,0906.1011

F. Kleefeld,The construction of a general inner product in non-Hermitian quantum theory and some explanation for the nonuniqueness of the C operator in PT quantum mechanics,0906.1011

work page arXiv
[29]

Shukla, R

N. Shukla, R. Modak and B.P. Mandal,Uncertainty relation for non-Hermitian systems,Phys. Rev. A107(2023) 042201 [2206.02844]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

Varma, I

A.V. Varma, I. Mohanty and S. Das,Temporal correlation beyond quantum bounds in non-hermitian dynamics,J. Phys. A54(2021) 115301 [1907.13400]

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

Kawabata, Y

K. Kawabata, Y. Ashida, H. Katsura and M. Ueda,Parity-time-symmetric topological superconductor,Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 085116 [1801.00499]

work page arXiv 2018
[32]

Mandal, B.K

B.P. Mandal, B.K. Mourya and R.K. Yadav,PT phase transition in higher-dimensional quantum systems,Phys. Lett. A377(2013) 1043 [1301.2387]

work page arXiv 2013
[33]

Varma, J.E

A.V. Varma, J.E. Muldoon, S. Paul, Y.N. Joglekar and S. Das,Extreme violation of the leggett-garg inequality in nonunitary dynamics with complex energies,Phys. Rev. A 108(2023) 032202

2023
[34]

Varma and S

A.V. Varma and S. Das,Simulating non-Hermitian dynamics of a multi-spin quantum system and an emergent central spin model,Phys. Rev. B104(2021) 035153 [2012.13415]

work page arXiv 2021
[35]

Modak and B.P

R. Modak and B.P. Mandal,Eigenstate entanglement entropy in a PT-invariant non-Hermitian system,Phys. Rev. A103(2021) 062416 [2102.01097]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

Varma, J.E

A.V. Varma, J.E. Muldoon, S. Paul, Y.N. Joglekar and S. Das,Essential role of quantum speed limit in violation of Leggett-Garg inequality across a PT-transition, Phys. Rev. A108(2023) 032202 [2203.04991]

work page arXiv 2023
[37]

T. Pal, R. Modak and B.P. Mandal,Parity–time-reversal symmetry-breaking transitions in polymeric systems,Phys. Rev. E111(2025) 014421 [2212.14394]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

Emergence of Hermitian topology from non-Hermitian knots

G. Hajong, R. Modak and B.P. Mandal,Emergence of Hermitian topology from non-Hermitian knots,Phys. Rev. B113(2026) 115406 [2504.20167]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[39]

Modak, S

N. Modak, S. Ashutosh, S. Guchhait, S. Ghosh, R. Dhara, J.K. Nayak et al., Inhomogeneous polarization transformation revealing a PT transition in non-Hermitian optical beam shifts,Phys. Rev. A110(2024) 023528 [2310.14210]

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

Hajong, R

G. Hajong, R. Modak and B.P. Mandal,Hellmann-Feynman theorem in non-Hermitian systems,Phys. Rev. A109(2024) 022227

2024
[41]

Bhasin and T

P. Bhasin and T. Das,A Hermitian bypass to the non-Hermitian quantum theory,J. Phys. A58(2025) 125303 [2310.10263]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

G. Das, A. Ghosh and B.P. Mandal,Quantum phase transitions and entanglement entropy in a non-hermitian jaynes–cummings model,Annals of Physics490(2026) 170484. 20

2026
[43]

Zyablovsky, A.P

A.A. Zyablovsky, A.P. Vinogradov, A.A. Pukhov, A.V. Dorofeenko and A.A. Lisyansky,Pt-symmetry in optics,Physics-Uspekhi57(2014) 1063

2014
[44]

Regensburger, C

A. Regensburger, C. Bersch, M.-A. Miri, G. Onishchukov, D.N. Christodoulides and U. Peschel,Parity–time synthetic photonic lattices,Nature488(2012) 167

2012
[45]

B. Rath,Generating (2×2) PT-symmetric matrices using Pauli matrices as Parity operator: Broken spectra and stop light in unbroken spectra at unequal points, European Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science7(2020)

2020
[46]

Chen and S

L. Chen and S. Sarkar,PT symmetric fermionic particle oscillations in even dimensional representations,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096008 [2407.02036]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Jones-Smith and H

K. Jones-Smith and H. Mathur,Relativistic Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 125014 [0908.4257]

work page arXiv 2014
[48]

Jones-Smith,Non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Ph.D

K.A. Jones-Smith,Non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Ph.D. thesis, Case Western Reserve University, 2010. https://people.hamilton.edu/documents/jonessmiththesis.pdf

2010
[49]

Mannheim,Antilinearity Rather than Hermiticity as a Guiding Principle for Quantum Theory,J

P.D. Mannheim,Antilinearity Rather than Hermiticity as a Guiding Principle for Quantum Theory,J. Phys. A51(2018) 315302 [1512.04915]

work page arXiv 2018
[50]

Mannheim,Extension of theCP TTheorem to non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Unstable States,Phys

P.D. Mannheim,Extension of theCP TTheorem to non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Unstable States,Phys. Lett. B753(2016) 288 [1512.03736]

work page arXiv 2016
[51]

Raval and B.P

H. Raval and B.P. Mandal,Deconfinement to Confinement as PT phase transition, Nucl. Phys.B(2019) 114699 [1805.02510]

work page arXiv 2019
[52]

Millington,Symmetry properties of non-HermitianPT-symmetric quantum field theories,J

P. Millington,Symmetry properties of non-HermitianPT-symmetric quantum field theories,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.1586(2020) 012001 [1903.09602]

work page arXiv 2020
[53]

Alexandre, J

J. Alexandre, J. Ellis and P. Millington,Discrete spacetime symmetries and particle mixing in non-Hermitian scalar quantum field theories,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 125030 [2006.06656]

work page arXiv 2020
[54]

Mannheim,Time advance and probability conservation in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,Phys

P.D. Mannheim,Time advance and probability conservation in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) L031903 [2504.12068]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

Chattopadhyay, K

D.S. Chattopadhyay, K. Chakraborty, A. Dighe, S. Goswami and S.M. Lakshmi, Neutrino Propagation When Mass Eigenstates and Decay Eigenstates Mismatch,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 011802 [2111.13128]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

Chattopadhyay, K

D.S. Chattopadhyay, K. Chakraborty, A. Dighe and S. Goswami,Analytic treatment of 3-flavor neutrino oscillation and decay in matter,JHEP01(2023) 051 [2204.05803]

work page arXiv 2023
[57]

Dixit, A.K

K. Dixit, A.K. Pradhan and S.U. Sankar,CP violation due to a Majorana phase in two flavor neutrino oscillations with decays,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 013002 [2207.09480]

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

Parveen, S

S. Parveen, S. Bonthu, N. Nath, U.K. Dey and P. Mehta,Majorana CP violation insights from decaying neutrinos,Nucl. Phys. B1023(2026) 117298 [2410.21428]

work page arXiv 2026
[59]

B. Soni, S. Shafaq and P. Mehta,Distinguishing between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos using temporal correlations,2307.04496

work page arXiv
[60]

Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry

A. Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry. The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum,J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 205 [math-ph/0107001]. 21

work page arXiv 2002
[61]

Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 2

A. Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 2. A Complete characterization of nonHermitian Hamiltonians with a real spectrum,J. Math. Phys. 43(2002) 2814 [math-ph/0110016]

work page arXiv 2002
[62]

Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 3: Equivalence of pseudoHermiticity and the presence of antilinear symmetries,J

A. Mostafazadeh,PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 3: Equivalence of pseudoHermiticity and the presence of antilinear symmetries,J. Math. Phys.43 (2002) 3944 [math-ph/0203005]

work page arXiv 2002
[63]

Mostafazadeh,Krein-Space Formulation of PT-Symmetry, CPT-Inner Products, and Pseudo-Hermiticity,Czech

A. Mostafazadeh,Krein-Space Formulation of PT-Symmetry, CPT-Inner Products, and Pseudo-Hermiticity,Czech. J. Phys.56(2006) 919 [quant-ph/0606173]

work page arXiv 2006
[64]

Mostafazadeh,Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics,Int

A. Mostafazadeh,Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics,Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.7(2010) 1191 [0810.5643]

work page arXiv 2010
[65]

Mehta,Topological phase in two flavor neutrino oscillations,Phys

P. Mehta,Topological phase in two flavor neutrino oscillations,Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 096013 [0901.0790]

work page arXiv 2009
[66]

Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles, University of Chicago Press (5, 1996)

G.G. Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles, University of Chicago Press (5, 1996)

1996
[67]

Breuer, E.-M

H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine and J. Piilo,Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behavior of Quantum Processes in Open Systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 210401 [0908.0238]. 22

work page arXiv 2009