pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22932 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Recognition: unknown

Characterization of the Volatile Properties of 133P/Elst-Pizarro and Other Main-Belt Comets with JWST and Ground-Based Observations

Henry H. Hsieh , John W. Noonan , Michael S. P. Kelley , Dennis Bodewits , Jana Pittichova , Audrey Thirouin , Marco Micheli , Scott S. Sheppard
show 5 more authors
Colin O. Chandler Theodore Kareta Colin Snodgrass Richard E. Cannon Brian P. Murphy
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 09:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords main-belt comet133P/Elst-Pizarrowater outgassingJWST NIRSpechypervolatile depletionvolatile compositioncometary activitymain asteroid belt
0
0 comments X

The pith

JWST NIRSpec observations measure water outgassing from main-belt comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro at two orbital positions, finding rates consistent with other MBCs and no hypervolatiles detected.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports direct measurements of water vapor production from 133P/Elst-Pizarro using JWST's NIRSpec instrument during its 2024 active period. At a true anomaly of 8 degrees and heliocentric distance of 2.674 au, the outgassing rate is 1.9 x 10^25 molecules per second, declining slightly to 1.4 x 10^25 at 37.4 degrees and 2.747 au. No CO, CO2, or methanol was detected, indicating strong depletion of hypervolatiles similar to other main-belt comets observed. The ratio of dust to water production appears consistent across detected MBCs, and no obvious links appear between water rates and nucleus size, orbit, or distance. These data help characterize the volatile content of objects in the main asteroid belt that exhibit cometary activity.

Core claim

Using NIRSpec, water vapor outgassing rates for 133P are measured as Q(H2O) = (1.9 ± 0.6) × 10^25 molecules/s at true anomaly 8° (rh=2.674 au) and Q(H2O) = (1.4 ± 0.4) × 10^25 molecules/s at 37.4° (rh=2.747 au). CO, CO2, and CH3OH are not detected, with Q(CO2)/Q(H2O) < 0.009, matching levels in other MBCs. The log(Afrho/Q(H2O)) averages -24.6 ± 0.2 across three MBCs with detected water, and no correlations are found with nucleus size, semimajor axis, or heliocentric distance in the JWST MBC sample.

What carries the argument

NIRSpec spectroscopy of water vapor emission lines in the near-infrared, combined with standard cometary coma models to derive absolute production rates Q(H2O) from observed line fluxes.

If this is right

  • Water production in 133P shows a possible 25% decline between the two observed points, though consistent with no change within errors.
  • Hypervolatile depletion in 133P is at a similar level to previously observed main-belt comets.
  • The dust-to-water ratio log(Afrho/Q(H2O)) is consistent at -24.6 ± 0.2 for all three MBCs with successful water detections.
  • No clear correlations exist between water production rates and nucleus size, semimajor axis, or heliocentric distance for JWST-observed MBCs.
  • Future observations should target MBCs interior to the 5A:2J MMR and at high inclinations, plus multiple visits per apparition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These measurements suggest that main-belt comets may retain ice despite their location, potentially informing models of solar system formation and water delivery to terrestrial planets.
  • Consistency in dust-to-gas ratios across MBCs could indicate a common activation mechanism or surface composition.
  • Absence of correlations with orbital parameters may imply that activity is driven more by local surface properties than by global orbit.
  • Additional JWST data could test if the slight decline in Q(H2O) is real or if rates vary more with true anomaly.

Load-bearing premise

The conversion from observed NIRSpec line fluxes to absolute water production rates relies on standard cometary coma models calibrated primarily on more active Jupiter-family comets.

What would settle it

An independent measurement of water production rate for 133P using a different instrument or modeling approach at a similar orbital position that differs by more than the reported uncertainties from the JWST values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22932 by Audrey Thirouin, Brian P. Murphy, Colin O. Chandler, Colin Snodgrass, Dennis Bodewits, Henry H. Hsieh, Jana Pittichova, John W. Noonan, Marco Micheli, Michael S. P. Kelley, Richard E. Cannon, Scott S. Sheppard, Theodore Kareta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: NIRSpec observations of 133P/Elst-Pizarro obtained on UT 2024 June 12 (JWST Cycle 2) for each of four NIRSpec dithers, compared to a bare-nucleus model (pV = 0.05, T = 220 K, r = 1.6 km), generated with the Planetary Spectrum Generator for the corresponding observing geometry. Individual dithers were median-combined to produce a higher signal-to-noise spectrum for analysis. Right: Normalized reflecta… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: NIRSpec observations of 133P/Elst-Pizarro obtained on UT 2024 September 20 (JWST Cycle 3), with dither and median combined spectra on the left and normalized reflectance on the right. See the caption of view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Median composite images of 133P/Elst-Pizarro, aligned on the photocenter of the comet in each individual image, constructed from (a) F200W and (b) F277W NIRCam data obtained on UT 2024 October 14, and (c) F200W and (d) F277W NIRCam data obtained on UT 2024 October 28, comprising 1031 s of total exposure time each. Labeled arrows indicate the directions of celestial north (N) and east (E), and the projected… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: PSG model fits (red) with residuals to the H2O emission of 133P on UT 2024 June 12 (Cycle 2) and 2024 October 14 (Cycle 3). A continuum is fit simultaneously with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo model using the emcee Python package to characterize uncertainties in the production rate fit, and a random subset of walkers are shown in blue. Our H2O emission model fits use Teff = 35 K, but we note that effects from… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalized and linearly corrected reflectance spectra for 133P from UT 2024 June 12 (left) and UT 2024 October 14 (right) with a wide (35 pixel) median filter applied. In both epochs there is a clear asymmetric 3 µm absorption feature with a band center at 3.1 µm, much like the non-sharp type low-albedo spectra described in A. S. Rivkin et al. (2022). The band shape and depth beyond 3 µm in the Cycle 3 obs… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Contour plots of the inner coma of 133P/Elst-Pizarro constructed from (a) F200W and (b) F277W NIRCam median composite images obtained on UT 2024 October 14, and (c) F200W and (d) F277W NIRCam median composite images obtained on UT 2024 October 28, shown in view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Enhanced F200W composite images of 133P from UT 2024 October 14 (a-d) and UT 2024 October 28 (e-h) using division by a 1/ρ profile (a, e), division by the azimuthal median (b, f), azimuthal renormalization (c, g), and Laplace filtering (d, h). Each panel is 7′′×7 ′′ in size, with the nucleus of the comet at the center of each image. the second derivative. As before, we see no apparent differences in any of… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plots of (a) equivalent total absolute V -band magnitude and (b) Af ρ measured for 133P as functions of true anomaly. In panel (a), the dashed horizontal line shows the absolute V -band magnitude of 133P’s inactive nucleus of HV = 15.88 mag previously reported by H. H. Hsieh et al. (2023), and the gray-shaded area bounded by horizontal dot￾ted lines indicates the range of potential brightness variations al… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Plot of Af ρ as a function of photometry aperture radius (solid blue line) in terms of arcseconds projected on the sky (bottom x-axis labels) and km at the distance of the comet (top x-axis labels) as measured for a composite image of 133P constructed from data obtained on UT 2024 October 27 by Gemini South, with a ρ −1.0 power law (dashed black line) shown for reference. The seeing (θs) from view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Semimajor axis versus eccentricity (top panel) and inclination (bottom panel) plots showing known asteroids (small gray dots) and the four MBCs observed to date by JWST (colored circular symbols, as labeled), based on values tabulated in view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Measured QH2O production rates for the five observations of four unique MBCs by JWST to date (colored circular symbols, as labeled) plotted versus semimajor axis of each object (left panel) and heliocentric distance of the object at the time of observation by JWST (right panel), where symbol sizes for MBCs are proportional to the measured sizes of each object’s nucleus. For reference, uncertainties are ma… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Inferred dust production rates (top panel) and measured log(Af ρ/QH2O) values (bottom panel) for the four MBCs observed by JWST to date (colored circular symbols, as labeled) plotted versus the heliocentric distance of the object at the time of observation by JWST, based on values tabulated in view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report results from an analysis of the volatile composition and evolution of main-belt comet (MBC) 133P/Elst-Pizarro using JWST NIRSpec and NIRCam observations and ground-based observations during its 2024 active apparition, and also assess the body of JWST MBC observations acquired to date. Using NIRSpec, we measure water vapor outgassing rates at two points in 133P's orbit, finding Q(H2O)=(1.9+/-0.6)x10^25 molecules/s on UT 2024 June 12 (at a true anomaly of nu=8 deg and heliocentric distance of rh=2.674 au), and Q(H2O)=(1.4+/-0.4)x10^25 molecules/s on UT 2024 October 14 (at nu=37.4 deg and rh=2.747 au). These measurements nominally represent a decline of ~25% in Q(H2O) between the visits, although they are also consistent with no change within uncertainties. We do not detect CO, CO2, or CH3OH, placing 133P's hypervolatile depletion (Q(CO2)/Q(H_2O)<0.009) at a similar level found for previously observed MBCs. We find log(Afrho/Q(H2O)) values for the three MBCs for which water vapor outgassing has been successfully detected that are consistent within uncertainties with an average value of log(Afrho/Q(H2O))=-24.6+/-0.2. Lastly, we find no clear correlations of water production rates with nucleus size, semimajor axis, or heliocentric distance among MBCs observed by JWST so far, but would particularly encourage future JWST observations of additional MBCs interior to the 5A:2J MMR with Jupiter and at high inclinations, as well as multiple observations of MBCs during single active apparitions to further investigate areas of interest identified from the current sample of JWST-observed MBCs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports JWST NIRSpec and NIRCam plus ground-based observations of main-belt comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro during its 2024 apparition. It derives water production rates Q(H2O) = (1.9 ± 0.6) × 10^25 and (1.4 ± 0.4) × 10^25 molecules s^-1 at true anomalies 8° and 37.4°, reports non-detections of CO, CO2, and CH3OH (yielding Q(CO2)/Q(H2O) < 0.009), finds that log(Afrho/Q(H2O)) for the three JWST-detected MBCs is consistent with an average of -24.6 ± 0.2, and reports no clear correlations between water production and nucleus size, semimajor axis, or heliocentric distance in the current JWST MBC sample.

Significance. If the absolute production rates hold, the work supplies the first multi-epoch JWST water measurements for an MBC and places quantitative limits on hypervolatile depletion that align with prior MBCs. The reported log(Afrho/Q(H2O)) average and the call for targeted future observations (interior to the 5:2 MMR, high-inclination targets, and repeat visits) provide a useful empirical benchmark for distinguishing MBC activity from other cometary populations. Direct space-based spectroscopy of faint comae and explicit upper limits are clear strengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section detailing NIRSpec data reduction and Q(H2O) derivation] The absolute Q(H2O) values rest on scaling NIRSpec line fluxes through standard coma models (excitation, radiative transfer, and terminal velocity) calibrated on high-activity JFCs with Q(H2O) > 10^27 s^-1. At the observed levels (~10^25 s^-1, rh ≈ 2.7 au) the coma is expected to be collisionally thin, so fixed assumptions on outflow speed and collision rates may not apply; no sensitivity runs or alternative-model results are referenced. This directly affects the reported ~25 % decline, the depletion ratio upper limit, and the cross-MBC log(Afrho/Q(H2O)) average.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains no information on the specific coma-model parameters, data-reduction pipeline, or systematic-error budget; adding one sentence on these points would improve immediate assessability.
  2. [Results and methods sections] Tables or text listing the exact model parameters (v_out, T_ex, scale lengths) adopted for each epoch and for the Afrho conversion would allow readers to reproduce or test the results.
  3. [Discussion of correlations] The statement of 'no clear correlations' with only three objects would be strengthened by explicit plots or a brief statistical note rather than qualitative description.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the single major comment below regarding the NIRSpec data reduction and Q(H2O) derivation. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion and sensitivity analysis to strengthen the presentation of our results while maintaining the integrity of the reported values and conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section detailing NIRSpec data reduction and Q(H2O) derivation] The absolute Q(H2O) values rest on scaling NIRSpec line fluxes through standard coma models (excitation, radiative transfer, and terminal velocity) calibrated on high-activity JFCs with Q(H2O) > 10^27 s^-1. At the observed levels (~10^25 s^-1, rh ≈ 2.7 au) the coma is expected to be collisionally thin, so fixed assumptions on outflow speed and collision rates may not apply; no sensitivity runs or alternative-model results are referenced. This directly affects the reported ~25 % decline, the depletion ratio upper limit, and the cross-MBC log(Afrho/Q(H2O)) average.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important point on model applicability. The Q(H2O) values were derived using established fluorescence excitation and radiative transfer models (as implemented in standard tools like those described in the literature for NIR cometary spectroscopy) that have been applied across a range of activity levels, including prior JWST observations of low-activity objects. The ~30% uncertainties quoted on each Q(H2O) measurement are intended to be conservative and encompass potential systematics from assumptions such as outflow velocity and collisional excitation rates. We note that the ~25% decline between the two epochs is already described in the manuscript as nominal and consistent with no change within uncertainties. For the CO2 non-detection, the upper limit on Q(CO2)/Q(H2O) is computed using consistent modeling assumptions for both the detected water lines and the CO2 upper limit, rendering the ratio relatively insensitive to absolute scaling uncertainties. The log(Afrho/Q(H2O)) average across the three MBCs similarly incorporates the per-object uncertainties. In the revised manuscript, we will add a paragraph discussing the applicability of these standard models to collisionally thin comae at MBC activity levels, cite relevant validation studies for low-Q regimes, and report the results of sensitivity tests (varying terminal velocity by ±20% and collision rates within plausible ranges), which show that derived Q(H2O) values change by <15% and remain within the quoted errors. These additions will not alter the reported numbers but will provide clearer context for the robustness of the decline, depletion limit, and cross-MBC average. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are direct observational reductions using external models

full rationale

The paper's key results are Q(H2O) values computed from NIRSpec line fluxes via standard Haser/vector coma models (excitation, radiative transfer, outflow velocity) that predate this work and were calibrated on JFCs. These models are not redefined or fitted here to match the reported rates, nor do any equations in the paper make the target Q(H2O) equivalent to its inputs by construction. Depletion ratios, log(Afrho/Q(H2O)) averages, and correlation checks are simple arithmetic comparisons of independently measured quantities. No self-citation chains, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renamings of known results appear as load-bearing steps. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard domain assumptions in cometary spectroscopy rather than new free parameters or invented entities. No explicit free parameters are introduced in the abstract; the work applies established techniques to new observations.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard cometary excitation and radiative-transfer models convert observed NIRSpec line fluxes to absolute production rates Q(H2O).
    Invoked to obtain the reported Q(H2O) values from spectral data.
  • domain assumption Non-detections of CO, CO2, and CH3OH can be converted to abundance upper limits relative to H2O using the same excitation assumptions.
    Used to place the hypervolatile depletion limit Q(CO2)/Q(H2O) < 0.009.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5751 in / 1982 out tokens · 76676 ms · 2026-05-08T09:31:49.116859+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    F., Millis, R

    A’Hearn, M. F., Millis, R. C., Schleicher, D. O., Osip, D. J., & Birch, P. V. 1995, The ensemble properties of comets: Results from narrowband photometry of 85 comets, 1976-1992., Icarus, 118, 223, doi: 10.1006/icar.1995.1190 A’Hearn, M. F., Schleicher, D. G., Millis, R. L., Feldman, P. D., & Thompson, D. T. 1984, Comet Bowell 1980b, AJ, 89, 579, doi: 10....

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1995.1190 1995

  2. [2]

    Package, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

  3. [3]

    2023, Activity distribution of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from combined measurements of non-gravitational forces and torques, A&A, 670, A170, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245243

    Attree, N., Jorda, L., Groussin, O., et al. 2023, Activity distribution of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from combined measurements of non-gravitational forces and torques, A&A, 670, A170, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245243

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245243 2023

  4. [4]

    2010, Polarimetry and photometry of the peculiar main-belt object 7968 = 133P/Elst-Pizarro, A&A, 514, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913339

    Muinonen, K. 2010, Polarimetry and photometry of the peculiar main-belt object 7968 = 133P/Elst-Pizarro, A&A, 514, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913339

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913339 2010

  5. [5]

    A., Dunham, E

    Bida, T. A., Dunham, E. W., Massey, P., & Roe, H. G. 2014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, 91472N, doi: 10.1117/12.2056872 B¨ oker, T., Beck, T. L., Birkmann, S. M., et al. 2023, In-orbit Performance of the Near-infrared Spectrograph NIRSpec on ...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2056872 2014

  6. [6]

    T., Yeomans, D., Housen, K., & Consolmagno, G

    Britt, D. T., Yeomans, D., Housen, K., & Consolmagno, G. 2002, Asteroids III (Tucson, University of Arizona Press), 485–500

    2002

  7. [7]

    2023, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10022973

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.12.5 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10022973

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10022973 2023

  8. [8]

    1984, The ESO Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera / EFOSC, The Messenger, 38, 9

    Buzzoni, B., Delabre, B., Dekker, H., et al. 1984, The ESO Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera / EFOSC, The Messenger, 38, 9

    1984

  9. [9]

    L., & Schleicher, D

    Cochran, A. L., & Schleicher, D. G. 1993, Observational Constraints on the Lifetime of Cometary H 2O, Icarus, 105, 235, doi: 10.1006/icar.1993.1121

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1121 1993

  10. [10]

    J., & A’Hearn, M

    Cowan, J. J., & A’Hearn, M. F. 1979, Vaporization of comet nuclei: Light curves and life times, Moon and Planets, 21, 155, doi: 10.1007/BF00897085

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00897085 1979

  11. [11]

    2023, astropy/ccdproc: 2.4.1, 2.4.1 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7986923

    Craig, M., Crawford, S., Seifert, M., et al. 2023, astropy/ccdproc: 2.4.1, 2.4.1 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7986923 De Pr´ a, M. N., Licandro, J., Pinilla-Alonso, N., et al. 2020, The spectroscopic properties of the Lixiaohua family, cradle of Main Belt Comets, Icarus, 338, 113473, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113473

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7986923 2023

  12. [12]

    , year = 2011, month = mar, volume =

    Dressler, A., Bigelow, B., Hare, T., et al. 2011, IMACS: The Inamori-Magellan Areal Camera and Spectrograph on Magellan-Baade, PASP, 123, 288, doi: 10.1086/658908

    work page doi:10.1086/658908 2011

  13. [13]

    W., Pizarro, O., Pollas, C., et al

    Elst, E. W., Pizarro, O., Pollas, C., et al. 1996, Comet P/1996 N2 (Elst-Pizarro), IAUC, 6456

    1996

  14. [14]

    Farinella, P., & Davis, D. R. 1992, Collision rates and impact velocities in the Main Asteroid Belt, Icarus, 97, 111, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(92)90060-K Fern´ andez, J. A., Tancredi, G., Rickman, H., & Licand ro, J. 1999, The population, magnitudes, and sizes of Jupiter family comets, A&A, 352, 327

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90060-k 1992

  15. [15]

    2012, Icarus, 221, 721, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.09.001

    Fink, U., & Rubin, M. 2012, The calculation of Afρand mass loss rate for comets, Icarus, 221, 721, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.09.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2012.09.001 2012

  16. [16]

    541, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXXIII

    Fitzpatrick, M., Placco, V., Bolton, A., et al. 2024, Modernizing IRAF to Support Gemini Data Reduction, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.01982, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.01982

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.01982 2024

  17. [17]

    and others , year=

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, The James Webb Space Telescope Mission, PASP, 135, 068001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5 2023

  18. [18]

    F., Fitzsimmons, A., Denneau, L., et al

    Gillan, A. F., Fitzsimmons, A., Denneau, L., et al. 2024, Dust Production Rates in Jupiter-family Comets: A Two Year Study with ATLAS Photometry, PSJ, 5, 25, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ad1394

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ad1394 2024

  19. [19]

    F., Fitzsimmons, A., Denneau, L., et al

    Gillan, A. F., Fitzsimmons, A., Denneau, L., et al. 2025, Dust Production Rates in Jupiter-family Comets. II. Trends and Population Insights from ATLAS Photometry of 116 JFCs, PSJ, 6, 172, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ade7fe

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ade7fe 2025

  20. [20]

    2016, On-sky commissioning of Hamamatsu CCDs in GMOS-S, in Proc

    Gimeno, G., Roth, K., Chiboucas, K., et al. 2016, On-sky commissioning of Hamamatsu CCDs in GMOS-S, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, 99082S, doi: 10.1117/12.2233883

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2233883 2016

  21. [21]

    D., Yeomans, D

    Giorgini, J. D., Yeomans, D. K., Chamberlin, A. B., et al. 1996, JPL’s On-Line Solar System Data Service, American Astronomical Society, 28, 25.04

    1996

  22. [22]

    2009, Dynamical constraints on the origin of Main Belt comets, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 44, 1863, doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb01995.x

    Haghighipour, N. 2009, Dynamical constraints on the origin of Main Belt comets, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 44, 1863, doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb01995.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb01995.x 2009

  23. [23]

    2016, Triggering Sublimation-driven Activity of Main Belt Comets, ApJ, 830, 22, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/22 30Hsieh et al

    Dvorak, R. 2016, Triggering Sublimation-driven Activity of Main Belt Comets, ApJ, 830, 22, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/22 30Hsieh et al

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/1/22 2016

  24. [24]

    I., Sch¨ afer, C

    Haghighipour, N., Maindl, T. I., Sch¨ afer, C. M., & Wandel, O. J. 2018, Triggering the Activation of Main-belt Comets: The Effect of Porosity, ApJ, 855, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa7f3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa7f3 2018

  25. [25]

    1980, The sun among the stars

    Hardorp, J. 1980, The sun among the stars. III - Energy distributions of 16 northern G-type stars and the solar flux calibration, A&A, 91, 221

    1980

  26. [26]

    1957, Distribution d’intensit´ e dans la tˆ ete d’une com` ete, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 43, 740

    Haser, L. 1957, Distribution d’intensit´ e dans la tˆ ete d’une com` ete, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 43, 740

    1957

  27. [27]

    The Gemini–North Multi‐Object Spectrograph: Performance in Imaging, Long‐Slit, and Multi‐Object Spectroscopic Modes

    Hook, I. M., Jørgensen, I., Allington-Smith, J. R., et al. 2004, The Gemini-North Multi-Object Spectrograph: Performance in Imaging, Long-Slit, and Multi-Object Spectroscopic Modes, PASP, 116, 425, doi: 10.1086/383624

    work page doi:10.1086/383624 2004

  28. [28]

    Hsieh, H. H. 2014a, IAU Symposium: Formation, Detection, and Characterization of Extrasolar Habitable Planets, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 293, IAU Symposium: Formation, Detection, and Characterization of Extrasolar Habitable Planets, 212–218, doi: 10.1017/S1743921313012866

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921313012866

  29. [29]

    Hsieh, H. H. 2014b, The nucleus of main-belt Comet P/2010 R2 (La Sagra), Icarus, 243, 16, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.08.033

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.08.033 2010

  30. [30]

    H., & Haghighipour, N

    Hsieh, H. H., & Haghighipour, N. 2016, Potential Jupiter-Family comet contamination of the main asteroid belt, Icarus, 277, 19, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.04.043

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.04.043 2016

  31. [31]

    H., Ishiguro, M., Knight, M

    Hsieh, H. H., Ishiguro, M., Knight, M. M., et al. 2018a, The Reactivation and Nucleus Characterization of Main-belt Comet 358P/PANSTARRS (P/2012 T1), AJ, 156, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aac81c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aac81c 2012

  32. [32]

    H., Ishiguro, M., Knight, M

    Hsieh, H. H., Ishiguro, M., Knight, M. M., et al. 2021, The Reactivation of Main-belt Comet 259P/Garradd (P/2008 R1), PSJ, 2, 62, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/abe59d

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/abe59d 2021

  33. [33]

    H., & Jewitt, D

    Hsieh, H. H., & Jewitt, D. 2006, A Population of Comets in the Main Asteroid Belt, Science, 312, 561, doi: 10.1126/science.1125150

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1125150 2006

  34. [34]

    H., Jewitt, D., & Fern´ andez, Y

    Hsieh, H. H., Jewitt, D., & Fern´ andez, Y. R. 2009, Albedos of Main-Belt Comets 133P/Elst-Pizarro and 176P/LINEAR, ApJL, 694, L111, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/L111

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/694/2/l111 2009

  35. [35]

    L., & Haiman, Z

    Snodgrass, C. 2010, The return of activity in main-belt comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, MNRAS, 403, 363, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16120.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16120.x 2010

  36. [36]

    H., Jewitt, D

    Hsieh, H. H., Jewitt, D. C., & Fern´ andez, Y. R. 2004, The Strange Case of 133P/Elst-Pizarro: A Comet among the

    2004

  37. [37]

    Asteroids, AJ, 127, 2997, doi: 10.1086/383208

    work page doi:10.1086/383208

  38. [38]

    H., Novakovi´ c, B., Kim, Y., & Brasser, R

    Hsieh, H. H., Novakovi´ c, B., Kim, Y., & Brasser, R. 2018b, Asteroid Family Associations of Active Asteroids, AJ, 155, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaa5a2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa5a2

  39. [39]

    H., Pohlen, M., & Matulonis, A

    Hsieh, H. H., Pohlen, M., & Matulonis, A. 2013, Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 3564

    2013

  40. [40]

    H., Yang, B., & Haghighipour, N

    Hsieh, H. H., Yang, B., & Haghighipour, N. 2012a, Optical and Dynamical Characterization of Comet-like Main-belt Asteroid (596) Scheila, ApJ, 744, 9, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/9

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/744/1/9

  41. [41]

    H., Yang, B., Haghighipour, N., et al

    Hsieh, H. H., Yang, B., Haghighipour, N., et al. 2012b, Discovery of Main-belt Comet P/2006 VW 139 by Pan-STARRS1, ApJL, 748, L15, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/748/1/L15

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/748/1/l15 2006

  42. [42]

    H., Yang, B., Haghighipour, N., et al

    Hsieh, H. H., Yang, B., Haghighipour, N., et al. 2012c, Observational and Dynamical Characterization of Main-belt Comet P/2010 R2 (La Sagra), AJ, 143, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/5/104

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/5/104 2010

  43. [43]

    H., Ishiguro, M., Kim, Y., et al

    Hsieh, H. H., Ishiguro, M., Kim, Y., et al. 2018c, The 2016 Reactivations of the Main-belt Comets 238P/Read and 288P/(300163) 2006 VW 139, AJ, 156, 223, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aae528

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aae528 2016

  44. [44]

    H., Micheli, M., Kelley, M

    Hsieh, H. H., Micheli, M., Kelley, M. S. P., et al. 2023, Observational Characterization of Main-Belt Comet and Candidate Main-Belt Comet Nuclei, PSJ, 4, 43, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/acbdfe

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/acbdfe 2023

  45. [45]

    H., Noonan, J

    Hsieh, H. H., Noonan, J. W., Kelley, M. S. P., et al. 2025, The Volatile Composition and Activity Evolution of Main-belt Comet 358P/PANSTARRS, PSJ, 6, 3, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ad9199

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ad9199 2025

  46. [46]

    F., & Mukherjee, J

    Huebner, W. F., & Mukherjee, J. 2015, Photoionization and photodissociation rates in solar and blackbody radiation fields, Planetary and Space Science, 106, 11, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2014.11.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.11.022 2015

  47. [47]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope. I. Overview of the instrument and its capabilities, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142663 2022

  48. [48]

    1996, From Comets to Asteroids: When Hairy Stars Go Bald, Earth Moon and Planets, 72, 185, doi: 10.1007/BF00117517

    Jewitt, D. 1996, From Comets to Asteroids: When Hairy Stars Go Bald, Earth Moon and Planets, 72, 185, doi: 10.1007/BF00117517

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00117517 1996

  49. [49]

    2024, in Comets III, ed

    Jewitt, D., Hsieh, H., & Agarwal, J. 2015, Asteroids IV (Tucson, University of Arizona Press), 221–241, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816532131-ch012

    work page doi:10.2458/azu 2015

  50. [50]

    Jewitt, D., & Hsieh, H. H. 2024, The Asteroid-Comet Continuum, in Comets III, ed. K. J. Meech, M. R

    2024

  51. [51]

    2014, Hubble Space Telescope Investigation of Main-belt Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, AJ, 147, 117, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/117

    Jewitt, D., Ishiguro, M., Weaver, H., et al. 2014, Hubble Space Telescope Investigation of Main-belt Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, AJ, 147, 117, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/117 Volatile Composition of 133P and Other MBCs31

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/117 2014

  52. [52]

    2007, Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, IAUC, 8847

    Jewitt, D., Lacerda, P., & Peixinho, N. 2007, Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, IAUC, 8847

    2007

  53. [53]

    C., & Meech, K

    Jewitt, D. C., & Meech, K. J. 1987, Surface Brightness Profiles of 10 Comets, ApJ, 317, 992, doi: 10.1086/165347

    work page doi:10.1086/165347 1987

  54. [54]

    H., Agarwal, J., Bowles, N., et al

    Jones, G. H., Agarwal, J., Bowles, N., et al. 2018, The proposed Caroline ESA M3 mission to a Main Belt

    2018

  55. [55]

    Comet, Advances in Space Research, 62, 1921, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2018.02.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2018.02.032 1921

  56. [56]

    2011, Analysis of the Activity on Main Belt Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, in EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011, Vol

    Kaluna, H., Meech, K., & Hsieh, H. 2011, Analysis of the Activity on Main Belt Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, in EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011, Vol. 2011, 1375

    2011

  57. [57]

    U., Mottola, S., Hviid, S

    Keller, H. U., Mottola, S., Hviid, S. F., et al. 2017, Seasonal mass transfer on the nucleus of comet 67P/Chuyumov-Gerasimenko, MNRAS, 469, S357, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1726

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1726 2017

  58. [58]

    Kelley, M. S. P., Hsieh, H. H., Bodewits, D., et al. 2023, Spectroscopic identification of water emission from a main-belt comet, Nature, 619, 720, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06152-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06152-y 2023

  59. [59]

    2022, Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Active Asteroid P/2020 O1 (Lemmon-PANSTARRS), ApJL, 933, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac78de

    Kim, Y., Jewitt, D., Agarwal, J., et al. 2022, Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Active Asteroid P/2020 O1 (Lemmon-PANSTARRS), ApJL, 933, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac78de

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac78de 2022

  60. [60]

    P., et al

    Licandro, J., Campins, H., Tozzi, G. P., et al. 2011, Testing the comet nature of main belt comets. The spectra of 133P/Elst-Pizarro and 176P/LINEAR, A&A, 532, A65, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117018

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117018 2011

  61. [61]

    Marcus, J. N. 2007, Forward-Scattering Enhancement of Comet Brightness. I. Background and Model, International Comet Quarterly, 29, 39

    2007

  62. [62]

    Marschall, R., Markkanen, J., Gerig, S.-B., et al. 2020a, The dust-to-gas ratio, size distribution, and dust fall-back fraction of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: Inferences from linking the optical and dynamical properties of the inner comae., Frontiers in Physics, 8, 227, doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00227

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00227 2020

  63. [63]

    2020b, Cometary Comae-Surface Links, SSRv, 216, 130, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00744-0

    Marschall, R., Skorov, Y., Zakharov, V., et al. 2020b, Cometary Comae-Surface Links, SSRv, 216, 130, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00744-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00744-0

  64. [64]

    W., Hartogh, P., Rezac, L., et al

    Marshall, D. W., Hartogh, P., Rezac, L., et al. 2017, Spatially resolved evolution of the local H 2O production rates of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from the MIRO instrument on Rosetta, A&A, 603, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730502

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730502 2017

  65. [65]

    J., & Castillo-Rogez, J

    Meech, K. J., & Castillo-Rogez, J. C. 2015, Proteus - A Mission to Investigate the Origins of Earth’s Water, IAU General Assembly, 22, 2257859

    2015

  66. [66]

    2019, The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1426, doi: 10.21105/joss.01426

    Mommert, M., Kelley, M., de Val-Borro, M., et al. 2019, sbpy: A Python module for small-body planetary astronomy, The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1426, doi: 10.21105/joss.01426

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.01426 2019

  67. [67]

    W., Hsieh, H

    Noonan, J. W., Hsieh, H. H., Kelley, M. S. P., et al. 2025, JWST and Ground-Based Observations of Main-Belt Comet 457P/Lemmon-PANSTARRS, PSJ, submitted

    2025

  68. [68]

    Prialnik, D., & Rosenberg, E. D. 2009, Can ice survive in main-belt comets? Long-term evolution models of comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, MNRAS, 399, L79, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00727.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00727.x 2009

  69. [69]

    M., Feaga, L

    Protopapa, S., Sunshine, J. M., Feaga, L. M., et al. 2014, Water ice and dust in the innermost coma of comet 103P/Hartley 2, Icarus, 238, 191, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.04.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.04.008 2014

  70. [70]

    2020, Infrared detection of aliphatic organics on a cometary nucleus, Nature Astronomy, 4, 500, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0992-8

    Raponi, A., Ciarniello, M., Capaccioni, F., et al. 2020, Infrared detection of aliphatic organics on a cometary nucleus, Nature Astronomy, 4, 500, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0992-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0992-8 2020

  71. [71]

    Rauscher, B. J. 2024, NSClean: An Algorithm for Removing Correlated Noise from JWST NIRSpec Images, PASP, 136, 015001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b36

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b36 2024

  72. [72]

    2024, Detection and Flagging of Showers and Snowballs in JWST,, Technical Report JWST-STScI-008545, 24 pages

    Regan, M. 2024, Detection and Flagging of Showers and Snowballs in JWST,, Technical Report JWST-STScI-008545, 24 pages

    2024

  73. [73]

    J., Kelly, D

    Rieke, M. J., Kelly, D. M., Misselt, K., et al. 2023, Performance of NIRCam on JWST in Flight, PASP, 135, 028001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acac53

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acac53 2023

  74. [74]

    S., Emery, J

    Rivkin, A. S., Emery, J. P., Howell, E. S., et al. 2022, The Nature of Low-albedo Small Bodies from 3µm Spectroscopy: One Group that Formed within the Ammonia Snow Line and One that Formed beyond It, PSJ, 3, 153, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ac7217

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ac7217 2022

  75. [75]

    H., & Larson, S

    Samarasinha, N. H., & Larson, S. M. 2014, Image enhancement techniques for quantitative investigations of morphological features in cometary comae: A comparative study, Icarus, 239, 168, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.028 2014

  76. [76]

    H., Martin, M

    Samarasinha, N. H., Martin, M. P., & Larson, S. M. 2013, Cometary Coma Image Enhancement Facility, http://cie.psi.edu

    2013

  77. [77]

    H., & Mueller, B

    Samarasinha, N. H., & Mueller, B. E. A. 2013, Relating Changes in Cometary Rotation to Activity: Current Status and Applications to Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON), ApJL, 775, L10, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L10

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/l10 2013

  78. [78]

    G., & Bair, A

    Schleicher, D. G., & Bair, A. N. 2011, The Composition of the Interior of Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3: Results from Narrowband Photometry of Multiple

    2011

  79. [79]

    Components, AJ, 141, 177, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/6/177 32Hsieh et al

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/141/6/177

  80. [80]

    G., Knight, M

    Schleicher, D. G., Knight, M. M., & Levine, S. E. 2013, The Nucleus of Comet 10P/Tempel 2 in 2013 and Consequences Regarding its Rotational State: Early Science from the Discovery Channel Telescope, AJ, 146, 137, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/5/137

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/5/137 2013

Showing first 80 references.